Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Jimmy McArthur]

No problem at all: 
https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule/events/21780/manila-ops-feedback-running-at-scale-overcoming-barriers-to-deployment


Tom Barron wrote:
running at scale, barriers to deployment 



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Tom Barron]

Jimmy,

Also can we 's/barriers/overcoming barriers/' in the title of the 
manila session?


Thanks!

-- Tom

On 26/04/18 15:27 -0500, Jimmy McArthur wrote:

No problem.  Done :)


Colleen Murphy 
April 26, 2018 at 1:23 PM
Hi Jimmy,

I have a conflict on Thursday afternoon. Could I propose swapping 
these two sessions:


Monday 11:35-12:15 Manila Ops feedback: running at scale, barriers 
to deployment

Thursday 1:50-2:30 Default Roles

I've gotten affirmation from Tom and Lance on the swap, though if 
this causes problems for anyone else I'm happy to retract this 
request.


Colleen

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Jimmy McArthur 
April 25, 2018 at 4:07 PM
Hi everyone -

Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing 
(also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by 
two members from UC, TC and Foundation.


We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to 
create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed 
something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a 
major conflict in either content or speaker availability, please 
email speakersupp...@openstack.org.


Thanks all,
Jimmy
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators





__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Jimmy McArthur]

No problem.  Done :)


Colleen Murphy 
April 26, 2018 at 1:23 PM
Hi Jimmy,

I have a conflict on Thursday afternoon. Could I propose swapping 
these two sessions:


Monday 11:35-12:15 Manila Ops feedback: running at scale, barriers to 
deployment

Thursday 1:50-2:30 Default Roles

I've gotten affirmation from Tom and Lance on the swap, though if this 
causes problems for anyone else I'm happy to retract this request.


Colleen

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Jimmy McArthur 
April 25, 2018 at 4:07 PM
Hi everyone -

Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing 
(also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two 
members from UC, TC and Foundation.


We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to 
create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed 
something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a 
major conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email 
speakersupp...@openstack.org.


Thanks all,
Jimmy
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Colleen Murphy]

Hi Jimmy,

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 11:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
> Hi everyone -
> 
> Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing
>  
> (also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two 
> members from UC, TC and Foundation.
> 
> We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to 
> create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed 
> something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a major 
> conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email 
> speakersupp...@openstack.org.

I have a conflict on Thursday afternoon. Could I propose swapping these two 
sessions:

Monday 11:35-12:15 Manila Ops feedback: running at scale, barriers to deployment
Thursday 1:50-2:30 Default Roles

I've gotten affirmation from Tom and Lance on the swap, though if this causes 
problems for anyone else I'm happy to retract this request.

Colleen

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Thierry Carrez]

Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 4/25/2018 4:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
>> Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing
>> (also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two
>> members from UC, TC and Foundation.
>>
>> We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to
>> create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed
>> something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a
>> major conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email
>> speakersupp...@openstack.org.
> 
> Two questions:
> 
> 1. What does the yellow on the pre-emptible instances cell mean?

It was two sessions submitted after the deadline that the selection
committee decided to keep. Were highlighted yellow so that they could
find them.

> 2. Just from looking at this, it looks like there were far fewer
> submissions for forum topics than actual slots available, so basically
> everything was approved (unless it was an obvious duplicate or not
> appropriate for a forum session), is that right?

Yes, there were less submissions, but they were all actually quite good.
Encouraging teams to go through a round of brainstorming before
submitting yields a lot less duplicates and crazy sessions.

We also had ample space (3 parallel rooms for 4 days, with only one day
of keynotes), more than we used to have. We decided to use the 3rd room
as a room available to schedule follow-up sessions, in case 40 min does
not cut it. More details on that later once the schedule is approved.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Matt Riedemann]

On 4/25/2018 4:07 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing 
(also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two 
members from UC, TC and Foundation.


We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to 
create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed 
something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a major 
conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email 
speakersupp...@openstack.org.


Two questions:

1. What does the yellow on the pre-emptible instances cell mean?

2. Just from looking at this, it looks like there were far fewer 
submissions for forum topics than actual slots available, so basically 
everything was approved (unless it was an obvious duplicate or not 
appropriate for a forum session), is that right?


In the past when I've wondered if topic x should be a forum session or 
if I shouldn't bother, I was told to load up the proposals because 
chances were there would be more slots than proposals, and that seems to 
still be true.


On the one hand, less content to choose from is refreshing so you don't 
have to worry about picking between as many sessions that you're 
interested in. But I also wonder how many people held back on proposing 
something for fear of rejection or that they'd be taking a slot for 
something with a higher priority. I'm not sure if there is a problem 
here, or a solution needed, or if it would be useful for the people that 
pick the sessions to give a heads up before the deadline that there are 
still a lot of slots open.


--

Thanks,

Matt

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Summit Forum Schedule

[Jimmy McArthur]

Hi everyone -

Please have a look at the Vancouver Forum schedule: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15hkU0FLJ7yqougCiCQgprwTy867CGnmUvAvKaBjlDAo/edit?usp=sharing 
(also attached as a CSV) The proposed schedule was put together by two 
members from UC, TC and Foundation.


We do our best to avoid moving scheduled items around as it tends to 
create a domino affect, but we do realize we might have missed 
something.  The schedule should generally be set, but if you see a major 
conflict in either content or speaker availability, please email 
speakersupp...@openstack.org.


Thanks all,
Jimmy
Day,Time,"Room1 (Community, Ops, Infra)",Room2 (Feature/Future Discussion),Room3
Mon,11:35-12:15,Forum 101,"Manila Ops feedback: running at scale, barriers to deployment",
,1:30-2:10,Users / Operators adoption of QA tools / plugins,Standalone Cinder Introduction,Continuing the Migration: Launchpad -> StoryBoard
,2:20-3:00,Python Testing Interface,Requirements for Resource Reservation,A New Face and Place for the OpenStack Mentoring Program
,3:10-3:50,Machine Learning for CI Results Analysis,Building the path to extracting Placement from Nova,First Contact SIG Operator Inclusion
,4:20-5:00,SDK Testing and Certification,Planning to use Placement in Cinder,Ops/Devs: One community
,5:10-5:50,Python 2 Deprecation Timeline,Cyborg/FPGA Support for Cloud/NFV,Ops Meetups Team: catch-up and PTG merger discussion
Tue,9:00-9:40,Users & Ops feedback for Heat,Image handling in an edge cloud infrastructure,
,9:50-10:30,User and Ops Feedback session for OpenStack-Ansible,,
,11:00-11:40,Users & Ops feedback for Monasca (Monitoring & Logging aaS),Cinder High Availability (HA) Discussion,
,11:50-12:30,Ironic Ops and User feedback,Multi-attach introduction and future direction,
,1:50-2:30,Upgrading OpenStack - war stories,Update on the gaps identified by ETSI NFV in OpenStack,
,2:40-3:20,,Possible edge architectures for Keystone,
,3:30-4:10,nova/neutron + ops cross-project session,Supporting General Federation for Large-Scale Collaborations,
,4:40-5:20,CellsV2 migration process sync with operators,Fault Management/Monitoring for NFV/Edge/5G/IoT,
,5:30-6:10,Keystone Feedback Session,,
Wed,9:00-9:40,Fast Forward Upgrades Part I - Current State,Pre-emptible instances - the way forward,
,9:50-10:30,Fast Forward Upgrades Part II - Future Plans and WIP,Cinder's Documentation Discussion,
,11:00-11:40,"Interoperable Image Import Feedback, experiences, what next",Making NFV features easier to use,
,11:50-12:30,Kubernetes Cloud Provider OpenStack Feature Planning,DPDK/SR-IOV NFV Operational issues and way forward,
,1:50-2:30,Designate Ops / User / Distro Feedback session,Private Enterprise Cloud issues,
,2:40-3:20,Rolling maintenance and upgrade in interaction with VNFM,Missing features in OpenStack for public clouds,
,3:30-4:10,TripleO Ops and User feedback,OpenStack Passport Program - feedback and next step,
,4:40-5:20,Glance Operators'/Users Feedback,Drafting Requirements for Organisations Contributing to Open,
,5:30-6:10,OpenStack Operators Community documentation,TripleO and Ansible integration,
Thu,9:00-9:40,"Extended Maintenance part I: past, present and future",Neutron project handling of its RYU dependency,
,9:50-10:30,Extended Maintenance part II: EM and release cycles,[neutron] extend-logging-api,
,11:00-11:40,"OpenStack is ""mature"" -- time to get serious on Maintainers",[neutron-fwaas] firewall l7 fitlering,
,11:50-12:30,S Release goals,Image Lifecycle Management,
,1:50-2:30,"Official projects and the boundary of ""what is OpenStack""",Default Roles,
,2:40-3:20,TC Retrospective,Unified Limits,
,3:30-4:10,Cross-community governance between OSF projects,Advanced RCA use cases - taking Vitrage to the next level,
,4:40-5:20,Adjutant official project status,Vitrage RCA over K8s. Pets and Cattle - Monitor each cow?,
,5:30-6:10,,,__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev