Re: [opensuse-factory] Beta1 on VMWare requesting host clock rate change

2007-08-12 Thread Lars Rupp

On So 12 Aug 2007 11:17:37 CEST Vahis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

VMWare server 1.0.3 build-44356 running on 10.2 host,10.3 beta1 as quest.

Unfortunately I haven't installed any alphas this time so I don't know
if this came with beta1 or before.

Running Beta1 fills /var/log/messages on host with the following:

kernel: /dev/vmmon[3561]: host clock rate change request 306 - 348

The numbers change, the lines come every ten seconds.


Please try clock=pit on the bootprompt. This fixes it for my SLES9  
workstation - so it would be great to hear if this is also true for  
10.3...


Greetings,
Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-packaging] gpg is dead. Long live gpg

2007-06-21 Thread Lars Rupp

On Di 19 Jun 2007 13:47:51 CEST Klaus Singvogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Therefore we are doing a switch in openSUSE 10.3 RSN:
- gpg will be dropped


ok.


- gpg2 will be renamed to gpg


not ok.



We didn't noticed any problems regarding backward compatibility,
but we weren't able to do verey single test case.  :-)


man gpg2
No manual entry for gpg2

Is this worth a bugreport or will you fix it with the next submission?

Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] brp scripts in autobuild

2007-03-23 Thread Lars Rupp
Hi

From [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 from various discussions in bug reports I know that brp scripts for
 the following are installed in autobuild:
 
 - check whether .la files have an empty dependency_libs line
 - check whether .la and .pc files have references to the build root
 - check whether .desktop files have all their icons installed
 
 Are these scripts publicly available somewhere? They are not
 distributed with rpm, build or osc and I could not find them anywhere
 else either.

Currently not.


 If not, would it be possible to publish these (and others, if
 present)?

Adding this to my ToDo-List: talk to our managers and see what can be
published. But please don't expect a fast answer... :-/

Greetings,
Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Tor package

2007-03-09 Thread Lars Rupp
Am Fr 09.03.2007 10:50 schrieb Nikolay Derkach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I suggest including tor [1] package to the distribution. I suppose
 many people
 use anonymous Tor network in their daily activities and this app would
 be
 very usefull. In addition a GUI frontend like TorK [2] is welcome. 
 
 What do you think about this?

Please have a look at:
http://software.opensuse.org/download/security:/privacy/
Resp.:

http://download.uni-hd.de/ftp/pub/linux/opensuse/repositories/security:/privacy/openSUSE_10.2/repodata/repoview/tor-0-0.1.1.26-3.1.html

Test the package and try to talk to the maintainer of the tor package in
the buildservice if he can add TorK and/or submit both to the
distribution.

Regards,
Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] meeting minutes of last dist meeting

2007-02-27 Thread Lars Rupp
Am Mo 26.02.2007 17:53 schrieb Juan Erbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   And what about avahi-compat-mDNSResponder?
   Digikam do'nt works any more to connect to the cam's. With
   mDNSResponder digikam worked fine, but now mDNSResponder was
   dropped
   and its previous versions are no more compatible.
   https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239719
 
  We will fix those problems for 10.3,
 
 
 And now, how can I download the pictures from my cam?

Lets try Adrians RPMs of mDNSResponder:
http://software.opensuse.org/download/home:/adrianSuSE/

Greetings,
Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Making the basesystem smaller

2007-01-18 Thread Lars Rupp
Am Do 18.01.2007 09:39 schrieb Andreas Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 * What do you think of this?  Do you have better ideas?

Perhaps we can discuss if we need an additional option Remove after
installation in the YaST2-Packagemanager - for Example: Some
YaST2-Modules can be deleted, when the installation is finished...

Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Making the basesystem smaller

2007-01-18 Thread Lars Rupp
Am Do 18.01.2007 10:27 schrieb Ludwig Nussel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Well, since yast asks for the root password in 2nd stage a system
 without yast would be somewhat useless as you couldn't even log in
 after installation.

Thats why I wrote: deinstall after installation.

So we can walk trough the complete second stage of installation and
afterwards we've perhaps no YaST at all. So perhaps we need:
- smaller dependencies between the YaST modules
- a new YaST2-installation which contains all relevant parts
(impossible imho)
- a new step for deinstallation unneeded modules/rpms after installation
is finished

New items for AJs list: 
- Look for packages with more than x MB (lets start with 10MB) size and
see if we can downsize them by repackaging.
- Let the base pattern become very small and minimalistic. I agree
with Klaus that we perhaps need something like a bash - but if you say
that, there will probably be someone saying I need that fing 20MB
editor named vi - or this is no minimal system to live with. So why not
put only stuff like kernel, glibc and ... in the base pattern a system
can not start with. Extend these base pattern with additional patterns
like System administration (YaST), usefull system tools (vi, joe,
ifconfig, ...).

= This should result in a very small base pattern (target 1)
= We can discuss about the additional (system) patterns for the base
system in seperate threats.

Lars


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] acerhk suse 10.2

2006-12-28 Thread Lars Rupp
Am Mi 27.12.2006 17:36 schrieb Gianluca Cerminara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   I tried to install acerhk rpm but simply nohing happens:
 I only get the documentation in
 /usr/share/doc/packages/acerhk/
 but no kernel module!
 
 Does anybody have experience with this?

You should also install the acerhk-kmp package which fits to your kernel
(acerhk-kmp-default.rpm).

After that try
# depmod -a 
# modinfo acerhk
= You'll see a list of available options for this module. Normally it
should be save to load it just with modprobe acerhk and watch
/var/log/messages for kernel messages about this module. But you can set
some options listed via modinfo for you modell.

FYI: I placed the modprobe call in /etc/init.d/boot.local for my old
Acer TM290 - and everything works fine.

Greetings,
Lars


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Subversion on SuSE

2006-11-16 Thread Lars Rupp
Hi

Am Do 16.11.2006 19:49 schrieb Boyd Lynn Gerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I know that the SUSE developers do not always notice that packages
 have
 newer versions.

That could be true for FACTORY - not for released products ;-)

 I not that the one's I have add to bugzilla as a feature
 request have all been updated.  Maybe someon should file a bug feature
 request.


You'll not get Version Upgrades for a released product directly over the
SUSE update channel (ok: we have some exeptions). SUSE has a strict
policy for released products: no version upgrades, only updates for the
version released with the distribution.

The trick behind it: sometimes developers decide to add new features
and perhaps some API changes to new versions. If you have installed a
programm on your system and SUSE will deliver a upgrade - perhaps
afterwards neither your programm nor any other programm linked against
it will execute... Ask people who decided to upgrade their KDE version:
sometimes it works, sometimes not.

So the answer is: yes, you can _upgrade_ - but you should know that your
system can be unstable if something happens with the newer programm
version. If you just _update_, everything should work as expected - and
even better after the update.

The SUSE developers spend a lot of time fixing old versions of a
programm. Remember: the programms (and their version numbers!) on SLES10
have seven years support. So perhaps in seven years, a user who has
updated his system every day will just have subversion 1.3.1 on his
plattform - but this version should be very stable then. ;-)

Greetings,
  Lars

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] Customized cd creation

2006-11-14 Thread Lars Rupp
Hi Prajjwal 

On Tuesday 14 November 2006 06:00, Prajjwal Devkota wrote (shortened):
 * Has anyone tried to create customised installation
 cds for OpenSuse? I did that for Fedora Core 5 recently, with a bunch
 of rpms from extras, livna, and a few of my own rpms.  That feature
 is useful, but not essential.  However, being able to do a network
 install (a local network install, not from the official mirrors).  I
 am sure that Suse should support that, I still have to RTFM, so if
 you have any quickstart tips, I would be happy to hear them.

This depends on what you want. 
* Yes, you can install openSUSE via Network (SMB, NFS, FTP, HTTP, ...)
* Yes, you can customize your openSUSE:
+ create an Add on installation source if you just want to add some of 
your own packages:
http://en.opensuse.org/Add_Package_Repositories_to_YaST
http://en.opensuse.org/Inst-source-utils = create_update_source.sh

+ create a full customized installation source (even without or just 
some small user interaction):
http://www.suse.de/~ug/autoyast_doc/index.html

 Thanks, thats all my questions for now, I hope to hear from you soon.

I hope this is enough documentation for you... ;-)

Greetings,
Lars
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] x86_64 and ppc gone?

2006-07-19 Thread Lars Rupp
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 12:57, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote (shortened):
 Hi,

 since a couple of days now the directories

 inst-source/suse/ppc/
 inst-source/suse/ppc64/
 inst-source/suse/x86_64/

 are gone at factory.
 What's about it?

Sorry. My fault: :-( During renaming to openSUSE I deleted the wrong 
line in our internal config...

x86_64 and ppc should be available again with the next build. Sorry for 
creating extra traffic,

Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Packagage Groupings - From Selections in 10.1 to Patterns in 10.2

2006-07-12 Thread Lars Rupp
Hi

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 13:08, Andreas Jaeger wrote (shortened):
  I asume that `create_package_descr` will be either completely
  re-written or replaced by something else? If so, would it be
  possible to see that?

 Lars?

Yes: completely re-written.
I'm sorry, but I can give no final release date for the new script. 
Currently we're changing very much and try to integrate things 
we've outsourced to helper scripts bevore (with the intention to make 
the CD creation process a little bit faster).

In the end we can hopefully create a new package containing scripts for 
creating installation and update sources, CDs and so on . Currently you 
can find the latest official script in the rpm autoyast-utils. But 
this package creation is at the end of a very long todo list... :-(

Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Packagage Groupings - From Selections in 10.1 to Patterns in 10.2

2006-07-12 Thread Lars Rupp
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 16:13, houghi wrote (shortened):
 Will create_package_descr still be able to make .sel files, or will
 it be completely removed?

create_package_descr  has never created .sel or .pat files. 
create_package_descr   is only responsible for the creation of 
the /suse/setup/descr/packages* files.


 As far as I understand, I could just add OOo and then during
 installation will install all dependencies?

Yes. Thats one thing the resolver does (hopefully ;-).


 What happens when I then 
 want to deinstall OOo? Will it recognise the extra things it
 installed, or will that still be left behind?

Should be nearly the same as rpm -e OOo...

 What about things I installed with rpm -Uvh?

No problem with that - it's the same behavior as bevore. This has 
nothing to do with patterns ;-)

Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse-factory] Adding *.sel to an installation source

2006-05-15 Thread Lars Rupp
Hi 
 
 Am Mo 15.05.2006 08:04 schrieb houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
 
For a future version I want to add a Personal.sel to the intsallation. 
 For 
 one reason or another it is not picked up by YaST during the 
 installation, 
 so I am unable to select it. 
 
 What I did was copy /suse/setup/descr/Games-10.1-67.noarch.sel to 
 /suse/setup/descr/Personal-10.1-67.noarch.sel and then changed all 
 Games 
 in the file to Personal. 
 
 Next I added the line Personal-10.1-63.noarch.sel to 
 suse/setup/descr/selections 
 

 simpler (-: ls *.sel  suse/setup/descr/selections 
 
 Add: create a new MD5SUMS file! 
 
 
 
However when I edit suse/setup/descr/selections I get the `no catalog 
 found at ...` error, so I suppose it needs to be signed somewhere. 
 However 
 the only two *.key files are re-signed, so what am I missing? 
 

 - Add a new line to the content file (sha1sum...) 
 - copy your own gpg-key to /gpg-pubkey-*-*.asc 
 - add this key to the content file (line beginns with KEY SHA1...) 
 - rm content.asc content.key media.1/products.key media.1/products.asc 
- create a new media.1/products and content file (like houghis special
 10.1 version  
 - sign the content and the media.1/products file with your gpg key 
 - cp your /gpg-pubkey-*-*.asc to media.1/products.key content.key 
 
 Hoperfully I don't forget something...  
 
 Greetings, 
 Lars 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [opensuse] YAST for Debian - what happened to this?

2006-01-16 Thread Lars Rupp
On Friday 13 January 2006 18:27, M.Blackmore wrote (shortened):
 Did anything happen about that? I think that if YAST became more
 widely available it would be a good thing for Suse variant of
 linux... question prompted by someone on GLLLUG asking if there were
 any easy config tools for Debian.

 Anyone know?

Please have a look at
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?yast

http://yast4debian.alioth.debian.org/

Greetings,
Lars

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]