[OS-webwork] License

2003-02-10 Thread Kelvin Tan
Skimming through documentation in the dist and the Java files give (slightly)
conflicting information on WebWork license.

docs\license.html says
quoteWebWork is released as Open Source software under the BSD license. The
terms of the license can be found in the file license.txt. /quote

and license.txt is indeed a BSD-style license.

However, most (if not all. I didn't check) Java sources have the following
header:
/*
 * WebWork, Web Application Framework
 *
 * Distributable under Apache license.
 * See terms of license at opensource.org
 */

Now, I understand that APL is _compatible_ with the BSD license, but I don't
think they're similar or interchangeable. Or am I wrong...

And to thicken the plot, http://www.waferproject.org/feature-matrix2.html
declares WebWork as LGPL. :-)

Now which is which?


Regards,
Kelvin


The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook




---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature

2003-02-10 Thread Wayland Chan
-1

We'll never get 1.3 final out if we keep adding stuff
(no matter how useful it is).

Joseph, next time submit your hack to the project.
Even if it is a gross hack, the idea could have been
carried forward and refactored with help from others.

--- Joseph Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Awesome! I recently needed something like this and
 couldn't find it in 1.3.
 I came up with a solution by extending
 RedirectAction, but it was very much
 a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this
 could be included in
 some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed
 something and it's already
 supported there, my apologies!
 
 Joe



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



[OS-webwork] Using Actions as Welcome Files after form based authentication

2003-02-10 Thread Adam Schepis
I am currently using form based authentication in my web-app and i have my welcome file set to be an action. This works fine without form based authentication.. but once the form based authentication is there, it doesn't work. It gives me an error that it can't instantiate the action. Does anyone know why this happens and a workaround?
thanks
AdamDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Re: [OS-webwork] Using Actions as Welcome Files after form based authentication

2003-02-10 Thread Adam Schepis
I'd love to.. I'm using Orion 1.5.2. here's the error message im getting after entering the username and password into my j_security_check based login page.
ERROR [ServletDispatcher] Could not instantiate action:loginwebwork.action.ResultException at webwork.action.factory.ParametersActionFactoryProxy.getActionImpl(ParametersActionFactoryProxy.java:52) at webwork.action.factory.DefaultActionFactory.getActionImpl(DefaultActionFactory.java:90) at webwork.action.factory.ActionFactory.getAction(ActionFactory.java:62)
 at webwork.dispatcher.MyServletDispatcher.service(MyServletDispatcher.java:224) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:336) at com.evermind._cxb._abe(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._cxb._uec(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._io._twc(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._io._gc(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._if.run(Unknown Source)ERROR [ServletDispatcher] Could not instantiate action:loginwebwork.action.ResultException at webwork.action.factory.ParametersActionFactoryProxy.getActionImpl(ParametersActionFactoryProxy.java:52) at webwork.action.factory.DefaultActionFactory.getActionImpl(DefaultActionFactory.java:90) at webwork.action.factory.ActionFactory.getAction(ActionFactory.java:62)
 at webwork.dispatcher.MyServletDispatcher.service(MyServletDispatcher.java:224) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:336) at com.evermind._cxb._abe(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._cxb._uec(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._io._twc(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._io._gc(Unknown Source) at com.evermind._if.run(Unknown Source)
This isn't pasted twice.. this is actually what happens.. i get 3 or 4 of the same errors (or the stack trace of the error is printed out several times). And just to clarify MyServletDispatcher is the exact same code as ServletDispatcher here.. i was just using it to try and get more debug info. 
thanks again
adam
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

[OS-webwork] (no subject)

2003-02-10 Thread Cathal Cullinane

The problem I am having is that I cannot get a reference to the
Value stack when I am using frames in my JSP.  Basically I have a jsp called
desktop.jsp which defines  three frames that call three other JSPs,
leftmenu.jsp, menu.jsp and top.jsp. In my view.properties I define  the
following action query.success=desktop.jsp. In leftmenu.jsp I want to call
an ArrayList called purchaseOrderList which is populated in another class.
The problem is the leftmenu.jsp cannot get a reference to the value stack
that contains purchaseOrderList. So when I try to call it I get null.

%@ taglib uri=webwork prefix=webwork %
%@ taglib uri=webwork prefix=ui %
html
head

titleUntitled Document/title
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
/head

frameset rows=89,* frameborder=NO border=0 framespacing=0
cols=* 
  frame name=topFrame scrolling=NO noresize src=top.jsp 
  frameset cols=200,* frameborder=YES border=1
framespacing=1 rows=* bordercolor=#00/ 
  
webwork:property value=goodsReceiptList
frame name=leftFrame scrolling=NO noresize 
src=jsp:include page=leftmenu.jsp/ /
/webwork:property

webwork:property value=baseTable/

frame name=leftFrame scrolling=NO noresize
src=leftmenu.jsp/

frame name=mainFrame scrolling=NO noresize src=menu.jsp/

  /frameset
/frameset
noframesbody bgcolor=#FF text=#00


/table
/body/noframes
/html

In my view.properties I have

query.action=MyActionClass
query.success=desktop.jsp

then in leftmenu.jsp I'm trying to do the following

TABLE BORDER=0 CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=2
TR
THPurchase Orders/TH

/TR

webwork:iterator value=purchaseOrderList
tr
td
   a href=webwork:url
page=query.action?tableKey=?baseTable=/webwork:property
value=tableKey/webwork:property value=transactionHeader/
TARGET=_blankwebwork:property value=transactionName/
webwork:property value=baseTable//a 
/td
/tr
/webwork:iterator

/table

br
TABLE BORDER=0 CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=2
TR
THGoods Receipts/TH

/TR

webwork:iterator value=goodsReceiptList
tr
td
a href=webwork:url
page=query.action?baseTable=/webwork:property
value=baseTable/tableKey=webwork:property value=tableKey/
TARGET=_blankwebwork:property value=transactionName/webwork:property
value=transactionDescription//a  
 
/td
/tr
/webwork:iterator

/table








---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



RE: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature

2003-02-10 Thread Joseph Fifield
Sorry, I did not intend it to be for 1.3. With 1.3 at RC2, I wouldn't
expect new features to be added. I should have been clearer, some
upcoming 1.x release should have read some upcoming 1.3 release (I'm
assuming there will be).

If there will be such a release, would it still be useful for me to
submit what I have? I can certainly do that if you'd like.

Joe

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On 
 Behalf Of Wayland Chan
 Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:40 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
 
 
 -1
 
 We'll never get 1.3 final out if we keep adding stuff
 (no matter how useful it is).
 
 Joseph, next time submit your hack to the project.
 Even if it is a gross hack, the idea could have been
 carried forward and refactored with help from others.
 
 --- Joseph Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Awesome! I recently needed something like this and
  couldn't find it in 1.3.
  I came up with a solution by extending
  RedirectAction, but it was very much
  a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this
  could be included in
  some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed
  something and it's already
  supported there, my apologies!
  
  Joe
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. 
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



Re: [OS-webwork] License

2003-02-10 Thread Patrick Lightbody
WebWork is released under the OpenSymphony license, which is a derivative of
the Apache license. Anything that says otherwise is a carry over from before
WebWork joined OpenSymphony.

-Pat

- Original Message -
From: Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:48 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] License


 Skimming through documentation in the dist and the Java files give
(slightly)
 conflicting information on WebWork license.

 docs\license.html says
 quoteWebWork is released as Open Source software under the BSD license.
The
 terms of the license can be found in the file license.txt. /quote

 and license.txt is indeed a BSD-style license.

 However, most (if not all. I didn't check) Java sources have the following
 header:
 /*
  * WebWork, Web Application Framework
  *
  * Distributable under Apache license.
  * See terms of license at opensource.org
  */

 Now, I understand that APL is _compatible_ with the BSD license, but I
don't
 think they're similar or interchangeable. Or am I wrong...

 And to thicken the plot, http://www.waferproject.org/feature-matrix2.html
 declares WebWork as LGPL. :-)

 Now which is which?


 Regards,
 Kelvin

 
 The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook




 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld
http://www.vasoftware.com
 ___
 Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



RE: [OS-webwork] License

2003-02-10 Thread Francois Beauregard
Should be clarified though.

___
François Beauregard, b.ing.
Vice-président
Recherche et développement
Pyxis Technologies
www.pyxis-tech.com

T : (450) 681-9094, poste 102
F : (450) 681-5758
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Lightbody
Sent: February 10, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] License


WebWork is released under the OpenSymphony license, which is a derivative of
the Apache license. Anything that says otherwise is a carry over from before
WebWork joined OpenSymphony.

-Pat

- Original Message -
From: Kelvin Tan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:48 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] License


 Skimming through documentation in the dist and the Java files give
(slightly)
 conflicting information on WebWork license.

 docs\license.html says
 quoteWebWork is released as Open Source software under the BSD license.
The
 terms of the license can be found in the file license.txt. /quote

 and license.txt is indeed a BSD-style license.

 However, most (if not all. I didn't check) Java sources have the following
 header:
 /*
  * WebWork, Web Application Framework
  *
  * Distributable under Apache license.
  * See terms of license at opensource.org
  */

 Now, I understand that APL is _compatible_ with the BSD license, but I
don't
 think they're similar or interchangeable. Or am I wrong...

 And to thicken the plot, http://www.waferproject.org/feature-matrix2.html
 declares WebWork as LGPL. :-)

 Now which is which?


 Regards,
 Kelvin

 
 The book giving manifesto - http://how.to/sharethisbook




 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld
http://www.vasoftware.com
 ___
 Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



[OS-webwork] Localized and Parameterized Validation Messages in Xwork

2003-02-10 Thread Jason Carreira
I built the message localization and parameterization stuff for the
validation framework in Xwork. It uses the cool stuff Patrick put in to
parse the Redirect URL and apply Ognl to expressions inside ${...} for
parameterization and pushes the Validator on the stack before it does
this so you can get parameters from either the Validator or the Action.
The localization stuff builds off of the getText() stuff from
ActionSupport (which has now been copied over to Xwork) to get localized
validation messages and have defaults.

The text parsing stuff is going to be VERY useful in a lot of spots.

More details on this later, I promise. Check out the sandbox code if
you're too eager to wait, especially the test cases, which demonstrate
this functionality.

Jason

--
Jason Carreira
Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
phone:  585.240.2793
  fax:  585.272.8118
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
 


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



RE: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature

2003-02-10 Thread Jason Carreira
This is in the sandbox, not the current Webwork code.

 -Original Message-
 From: Wayland Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:40 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] [WW2] new ServletRedirectResult feature
 
 
 -1
 
 We'll never get 1.3 final out if we keep adding stuff
 (no matter how useful it is).
 
 Joseph, next time submit your hack to the project.
 Even if it is a gross hack, the idea could have been
 carried forward and refactored with help from others.
 
 --- Joseph Fifield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Awesome! I recently needed something like this and
  couldn't find it in 1.3.
  I came up with a solution by extending
  RedirectAction, but it was very much
  a gross hack :( Is there any way something like this
  could be included in
  some upcoming 1.x release? Oh, and if I missed
  something and it's already
  supported there, my apologies!
  
  Joe
 
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. 
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



[OS-webwork] Webwork with Velocity 1.3.1rc2

2003-02-10 Thread Mark Spooner
Hi,

I am new to Webwork and would like to try it with Velocity 1.3.1rc2.  Does anyone know 
what is involved in getting Webwork 1.3 to work with this version of velocity?

Cheers

Mark Spooner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
-- 
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork