Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
Patrick Lightbody wrote: If Ognl is just totally unacceptable, then let's discuss two options: 1) Redevelop the WW EL with speed as well as type conversion both as a top priority 2) Develop XWork to support pluggable ValueStack implementations Just a point on 2. This will introduce muchos confusion, especially in a situation where you want to compose an application from two individually developed parts which may use different implementations. It's also a documentation problem (it's like this, unless you use this stack, because then it looks like this, which has this and this semantics). Sometimes flexibility is good, sometimes it's a recipe for disaster. In this particular case I'd say it's the latter. Either make OGNL work ok, or go with 1). I'd personally prefer 1). /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senselogic Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
If Ognl is just totally unacceptable, then let's discuss two options: When we discussed this in #java it sounded to me like one could plug in a custom syntax parser into OGNL, thus solving this issue nicely. Did I misunderstand? Anders Hovmöller [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://boxed.killingar.net --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
-Original Message- From: boxed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] If Ognl is just totally unacceptable, then let's discuss two options: When we discussed this in #java it sounded to me like one could plug in a custom syntax parser into OGNL, thus solving this issue nicely. Did I misunderstand? If this is possible, this would be a great solution. If not, then maybe revamping the EL is the way to go. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
It is possible, but it involves basicacally writing at least _part_ of our own EL using JavaCC. I'll ask the Ognl guys more about it today. -Pat - Original Message - From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:19 AM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down() -Original Message- From: boxed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] If Ognl is just totally unacceptable, then let's discuss two options: When we discussed this in #java it sounded to me like one could plug in a custom syntax parser into OGNL, thus solving this issue nicely. Did I misunderstand? If this is possible, this would be a great solution. If not, then maybe revamping the EL is the way to go. --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
RE: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
-Original Message- From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down() It is possible, but it involves basicacally writing at least _part_ of our own EL using JavaCC. I'll ask the Ognl guys more about it today. Don't we already have our own EL written using JavaCC? :-) --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
Converting .. to [1] is easy enough, but what about /? Our converter would
need to be smart about foo/bar vs 10/5... or would we just not care about
mathematic operations?
When did mathematic operations come into the picture? The current EL
doesn't support mathematic operations, does it?
If this is really all there is to it, the following does the conversion in
1.5ms
pattern.matcher(s).replaceAll([1]).replace('/', '.');
Where pattern is:
java.util.regex.Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(\\.\\.);
Am I missing something?
--Erik
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
-1
This seems like an ugly hack, I think it's especially important at this stage of
dev to make things as hack-free as possible. Wouldn't it be possible to talk to
the ognl guys and get info from them on how to best support our syntax?
Quoting Erik Beeson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Converting .. to [1] is easy enough, but what about /? Our converter
would
need to be smart about foo/bar vs 10/5... or would we just not care about
mathematic operations?
When did mathematic operations come into the picture? The current EL
doesn't support mathematic operations, does it?
If this is really all there is to it, the following does the conversion in
1.5ms
pattern.matcher(s).replaceAll([1]).replace('/', '.');
Where pattern is:
java.util.regex.Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(\\.\\.);
Am I missing something?
--Erik
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
Working on that right now :)
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Erik Beeson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl: peek(), up(), and down()
-1
This seems like an ugly hack, I think it's especially important at this
stage of
dev to make things as hack-free as possible. Wouldn't it be possible to
talk to
the ognl guys and get info from them on how to best support our syntax?
Quoting Erik Beeson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Converting .. to [1] is easy enough, but what about /? Our converter
would
need to be smart about foo/bar vs 10/5... or would we just not care
about
mathematic operations?
When did mathematic operations come into the picture? The current EL
doesn't support mathematic operations, does it?
If this is really all there is to it, the following does the conversion
in
1.5ms
pattern.matcher(s).replaceAll([1]).replace('/', '.');
Where pattern is:
java.util.regex.Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(\\.\\.);
Am I missing something?
--Erik
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
