Rauch report: Oracle vs DB2

2003-07-16 Thread Jesse, Rich
Any Oracle/DB2 dual DBAs out there that can comment on the Rauch report (no
doubt financed by Oracle Corp)?

http://www.oracle.com/ip/deploy/database/theme_pages/index.html?ma_04252003.
html

Not that I'm particularly impressed on the ease of generating stats in
Oracle vs. DB2, but I'm just curious how the DB2 side applies to real-world.
I haven't used most of the Oracle GUI stuff as reported.

Rich

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: Rauch report: Oracle vs DB2

2003-07-16 Thread Stephane Paquette
If you go on DB2 site,
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/pubs/pdfs/dhbrown.pdf , you'll find a
similar document that concludes that TCO of DB2 is below Oracle's one.


Stephane Paquette
Administrateur de bases de donnees
Database Administrator
Standard Life
www.standardlife.ca
Tel. (514) 499-7999 7470 and (514) 925-7187
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
Jesse, Rich
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Any Oracle/DB2 dual DBAs out there that can comment on the Rauch report (no
doubt financed by Oracle Corp)?

http://www.oracle.com/ip/deploy/database/theme_pages/index.html?ma_04252003.
html

Not that I'm particularly impressed on the ease of generating stats in
Oracle vs. DB2, but I'm just curious how the DB2 side applies to real-world.
I haven't used most of the Oracle GUI stuff as reported.

Rich

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Stephane Paquette
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


RE: Rauch report: Oracle vs DB2

2003-07-16 Thread Goulet, Dick
Having seen the report previously I can say that IMHO it's an apples vs. oranges 
report.  Given an experienced DBA on both systems I still believe that can do the same 
basic task in a similar amount of time  effort.  Why, because they 1) understand the 
process for their RDBMS, and 2) they've scripted it all out in the first place.  Now 
if your talking about an in-experienced person using the GUI's, well maybe Oracle is 
easier.

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA 

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Any Oracle/DB2 dual DBAs out there that can comment on the Rauch report (no
doubt financed by Oracle Corp)?

http://www.oracle.com/ip/deploy/database/theme_pages/index.html?ma_04252003.
html

Not that I'm particularly impressed on the ease of generating stats in
Oracle vs. DB2, but I'm just curious how the DB2 side applies to real-world.
I haven't used most of the Oracle GUI stuff as reported.

Rich

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Goulet, Dick
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle Vs DB2

2003-03-25 Thread Pradip_Biswas



Oracle 
has some internal site for "competetive" info. You can browse the oracle site www.oracle.com to start with. You can also 
contact oracle "Sales" Consultants if know your Oracle Account Manager ( Sales 
Rep). www.oracle.com may also have some 
contact info ( for example some Telesales contacts) who would love the "lead", 
given by you.

Thanks and Best 
Regards, -Original 
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:15 
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list OR[Biswas, 
Pradip]ACLE-LSubject: Oracle Vs 
DB2
Dear All, 
  Strange as it seems, my client has asked 
  me to compare Oracle with DB2 with regard to all the DB functional aspects. They are more inclined towards DB2 
  and we have the application built on Oracle. We are in for a one-to-one comparison based on the features that we 
  already have in Oracle and that are in 
  use in our application. For eg, function based indexes, table clustering, RAC, 
  partitioning (of all kinds - 
  list,range,hash), External tables, to name a few. I would really appreciate if anyone can throw some 
  light into this. Links to any sites would also be helpful. We dont have much time for this activity, so 
  please help us. I havent worked in DB2 as well which is the biggest bottleneck that I 
  face.Best RegardsJai


Re: Oracle Vs DB2

2003-03-25 Thread Daniel Wisser
hi!

db2 sites which i can strongly recommend are

http://www-3.ibm.com/cgi-bin/db2www/data/db2/udb/winos2unix/support/v7pubs.d2w/en_main

and

http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/db2/os390/v7books.html

i guess you will have a close look at V7 and V8, but V5 and V6
are also there and even V4 for MVS.

daniel
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Daniel Wisser
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Oracle Vs DB2

2003-03-24 Thread JayK

Dear All,

Strange as it seems, my client has asked me to compare Oracle with DB2 with regard to all the DB
functional aspects. They are more inclined towards DB2 and we have the application built on Oracle.
We are in for a one-to-one comparison based on the features that we already have in Oracle and 
that are in use in our application. For eg, function based indexes, table clustering, RAC, partitioning 
(of all kinds - list,range,hash), External tables, to name a few.

I would really appreciate if anyone can throw some light into this. Links to any sites would also be
helpful. We dont have much time for this activity, so please help us. I havent worked in DB2 as well
which is the biggest bottleneck that I face.

Best Regards
Jai

Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Alexandre Gorbatchev

Mike,

Here is pro-IBM :) report:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/pubs/papers/orac91vsdb272/orac91vsdb272.p
df

Alexandre

 Hi Everyone!

 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
 DB2.

 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position',
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.

 Any references are appreciated.

 Thanks,
 Mike

 ---

===
 Michael P. Vergara
 Oracle DBA
 Guidant Corporation

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Alexandre Gorbatchev
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS

Mike
eWeek did a head-to-head comparison among the leading databases,
including Oracle and DB2. Oracle kicked butt.

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp

In searching, I found an interesting site that provides links to all sorts
of database comparisons.
http://www.itsystems.lv/gints/compare_db.htm

Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:38 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi Everyone!

Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
DB2.

Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
'Platform Compatibility'.

Any references are appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike

---
===
Michael P. Vergara
Oracle DBA
Guidant Corporation

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread dgoulet

The Director of New Technologies here took a look at Oracle vs. DB2 vs.
SQL*Server around the first of the year to see if it made any sense to remain
with Oracle (remember my licensing problems of some months ago).  Anyway, dollar
for dollar he found that their all about the same in features/performance vs.
dollars expended.  Sure DB2 and SQL*Server were cheaper out of the box, but the
add-ons that we got with Oracle added up to a higher cost in the end.

To answer the questions you asked and buzzwords your faced with:

The TCO or Total Cost of Ownership is just about a wash.  Oracle leads
somewhat since there is a larger third party market (or so I've been told). 
Oracle people are expensive, but there are also more of them in the marketplace.

On the Future Market Position, some one correct me if I'm wrong, but Oracle
is the #2 software company right behind MicroSoft so their not going away any
time soon.

On Demonstrated Technology, here I think Oracle takes a bit of a hit.  Not
because they don't lead the market but because they ship it when it's not fully
cooked first.  Hence we end up with some odd behavior that gets fixed quite
soon.  It's also the reason I don't use Oracle version X.0.0 release 1, but wait
for release 2.

And on the front of Platform Compatibility again Oracle took the lead
covering more platforms than anyone else.  Believe it or not, their still
supporting HP MPE-IX even though all of the others have dropped it.  I should
know, had to call them yesterday.

In general though, which ever database vendor you use is getting to be more and
more a political decision within the company.  And in many cases I think we're
going to be faced with handling more than one vendor at a time.  The other items
that is somewhat perplexing is that certain vendors of application software are
writing to a specific database vendor and then imbedding that database into the
application as a black box.  The bigger problem is that your then stuck with
that database on that specific system (CPU and OS) and a vendor who has very
little knowledge of what's going on.  Especially when things break.  Like our
friends at a nameless payroll processing center who shipped us a server with
Oracle 7.1 on it  did not provide any details.  Then the damned thing breaks on
a Monday morning  they are afraid we can't get anyone to look at it for 2
weeks.  Yeah, right leave payroll undone for 2 weeks and see what happens.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   8/12/2002 3:31 PM



-- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/12/02 14:38:19 -0800

 Hi Everyone!
 
 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
 DB2.
 
 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.

www.ibm.com

--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Steven Lembark



One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.

--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread ltiu

People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL Server, MySQL,
Oracle or Sybase.

The point here is not which one is the best database, but which combination of
database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on investment.

Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about DB2 - even
if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do not have the
poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.

If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based on which
is the best database for you (databse and people included).

Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.

ltiu

Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 
 One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
 we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
 This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
 
 --
 Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
 Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
 +1 800 762 1582
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Steven Lembark
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Igor Neyman

 Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.


I wouldn't bet my money on that :-)

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:08 PM


 People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
 comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL Server,
MySQL,
 Oracle or Sybase.

 The point here is not which one is the best database, but which
combination of
 database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on
investment.

 Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about DB2 -
even
 if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do not
have the
 poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.

 If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based on
which
 is the best database for you (databse and people included).

 Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.

 ltiu

 Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 
  One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
  we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
  This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
 
  --
  Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
  Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
  +1 800 762 1582
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: Steven Lembark
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: ltiu
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread dgoulet

Humm,  If you've got Oracle DBA's who are swearing at their databases you might
question the way they do their work.  I've 25 instances  I don't have to swear
at any of them.  Now the users, that's another story.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   8/13/2002 7:13 AM



One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.

--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread ltiu

But then this is an Oracle email list. What do you know, Oracle is da Best!!

Quoting Igor Neyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
 
 
 I wouldn't bet my money on that :-)
 
 Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:08 PM
 
 
  People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
  comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL Server,
 MySQL,
  Oracle or Sybase.
 
  The point here is not which one is the best database, but which
 combination of
  database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on
 investment.
 
  Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about DB2
 -
 even
  if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do not
 have the
  poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.
 
  If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based on
 which
  is the best database for you (databse and people included).
 
  Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
 
  ltiu
 
  Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  
  
   One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
   we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
   This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
  
   --
   Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
   Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author: Steven Lembark
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
   
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
  
 
 
 
 
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: ltiu
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Igor Neyman
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: ltiu
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Igor Neyman

Don't take it so personal.

I agree, unskilled people can bring Oracle down to Access level.
But, there is no such skill, which can make Access perform at Oracle level
:-)

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 1:13 PM


 But then this is an Oracle email list. What do you know, Oracle is da
Best!!

 Quoting Igor Neyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

   Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
  
 
  I wouldn't bet my money on that :-)
 
  Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 12:08 PM
 
 
   People like to work(and are more effective) in an environment they are
   comfortable with, may it be Cobol Mainframe, RPG AS/400, MS SQL
Server,
  MySQL,
   Oracle or Sybase.
  
   The point here is not which one is the best database, but which
  combination of
   database and people(talent/skill) can give you the best return on
  investment.
  
   Pointless having to use DB2 if your people don't know anything about
DB2
  -
  even
   if DB2 is the best, you still can't get it off the ground if you do
not
  have the
   poeple to work it. Same goes for the other databases.
  
   If you need to evaluate which is the best database, evaluate it based
on
  which
   is the best database for you (databse and people included).
  
   Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
  
   ltiu
  
   Quoting Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   
   
One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.
   
--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
   
  
  
  
  
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author: ltiu
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
   
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: Igor Neyman
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
  
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 




 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: ltiu
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public 

RE: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Jesse, Rich

OK, I can take the subjectiveness of My DB is better than your DB, but
this statement is nothing short of a marketing lie.

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

 -Original Message-
 From: ltiu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:08 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re: Oracle vs. DB2

 ...
 Even MS Access can fly to the moon if you have good people working it.
 ...
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Jesse, Rich

In the immortal words of Moe Syzlak:  Whaaa?!?

I need to ask for more money!  Or was the implication that I have
expensive tastes?   ;)

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:44 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2
 
 Oracle people are expensive
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-12 Thread Vergara, Michael (TEM)

Hi Everyone!

Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
DB2.

Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
'Platform Compatibility'.

Any references are appreciated.

Thanks,
Mike

---
===
Michael P. Vergara
Oracle DBA
Guidant Corporation

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-12 Thread paquette stephane

For what I've read, globally the 2 databases are equal
in performance, reliability and functionnalities.
Larryh E as many times said that it's only competition
in the database market is DB2.

I guess it really depends on your environment.

Of course Oracle works on more OS (used to be anyway),
but which big organisation only have one DB ? All big
companies I've worked have many DB.

I would be interested by any non-partial comparison
between Oracle and DB2.


 --- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :  Hi Everyone!
 
 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft
 traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar
 comparison to IBM's
 DB2.
 
 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where
 there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and
 DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market
 Position', 
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated
 Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.
 
 Any references are appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Mike
 
 ---

===
 Michael P. Vergara
 Oracle DBA
 Guidant Corporation
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
 http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM)
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
 (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet
 access / Mailing Lists


 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
 E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
 ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
 from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information
 (like subscribing). 

=
Stéphane Paquette
DBA Oracle, consultant entrepôt de données
Oracle DBA, datawarehouse consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?paquette=20stephane?=
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-12 Thread lembark



-- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/12/02 14:38:19 -0800

 Hi Everyone!
 
 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
 DB2.
 
 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.

www.ibm.com

--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-29 Thread Eric D. Pierce

is that part of Larry's reducing complexity thangy?


[via: ORACLE-L Digest -- Volume 2001, Number 241]

 
 --
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:41:03 -0400
  Subject: Oracle VS. DB2
 
 Any comment on the following:
 
 IBM enlists ISVs in war against Oracle
 
 Strategic alliances with independent software vendors have helped IBM gain
 new customers for its DB2 database software. IBM also appears to be
 getting help from an unlikely source: Oracle Corp.
 
 http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63350_NLTAM%2C00.html
 
 Personally, I believe they've hit the nail straight on the head.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Grabowy, Chris

Time will tell.  But it appears that Larry burned quite a few bridges in the
past few months.  Those third party Oracle apps(SAP, Peoplesoft, etc) were
bringing in easy money for Oracle.  Building up the applications side of
Oracle is a good thing, but you dont jump up on the highest pedstal, beat
your chest and insult your, direct or in-direct, partners...like I said,
time will tell.

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Any comment on the following:

IBM enlists ISVs in war against Oracle

Strategic alliances with independent software vendors have helped IBM gain
new
customers for its DB2 database software. IBM also appears to be getting help
from an unlikely source: Oracle Corp.

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63350_NLTAM%2C00.html

Personally, I believe they've hit the nail straight on the head.

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Henry Poras

It seems like this is a problem which would naturally arise from selling
both databases and applications and is accentuated by Ellison's ego.

Henry
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Any comment on the following:

IBM enlists ISVs in war against Oracle

Strategic alliances with independent software vendors have helped IBM gain
new
customers for its DB2 database software. IBM also appears to be getting help
from an unlikely source: Oracle Corp.

http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO63350_NLTAM%2C00.html

Personally, I believe they've hit the nail straight on the head.

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Weaver, Walt

Yup. Seems to me the worst thing that has happened to Oracle is when Ray
Lane quit. Now Larry is a loose cannon.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Time will tell.  But it appears that Larry burned quite a few bridges in the
past few months.  Those third party Oracle apps(SAP, Peoplesoft, etc) were
bringing in easy money for Oracle.  Building up the applications side of
Oracle is a good thing, but you dont jump up on the highest pedstal, beat
your chest and insult your, direct or in-direct, partners...like I said,
time will tell.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle VS. DB2

2001-08-28 Thread Grabowy, Chris

Errr...well, I read an article about Larry and Oracle from some business
magazine.  Basically, Larry was in a sailboat race, and had a near death
experience.  So when he came back, he decided to live life to the fullest.
He started stripping power from execs, wanting to make the call on
everything at the company.  So with Larry making all the calls, what is the
point in Ray staying?  Now where did I put those SQL Server manuals?!?!?!?!

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Yup. Seems to me the worst thing that has happened to Oracle is when Ray
Lane quit. Now Larry is a loose cannon.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Time will tell.  But it appears that Larry burned quite a few bridges in the
past few months.  Those third party Oracle apps(SAP, Peoplesoft, etc) were
bringing in easy money for Oracle.  Building up the applications side of
Oracle is a good thing, but you dont jump up on the highest pedstal, beat
your chest and insult your, direct or in-direct, partners...like I said,
time will tell.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Grabowy, Chris
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2 - Oracle lost on cost

2001-04-26 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

To fan the flames, a colleague here sent me this URL re. Oracle on the
DB2/Informix deal:

http://www.oracle.com/start/apr30informix/intro.html
http://www.oracle.com/start/apr30informix/intro.html 

: )

Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re[2]: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread dgoulet

Tim,

Thanks for the copy of the marketing speil, I had not heard that one before.
 But, I'll take great exception to the claim that:

 It would make sense to select a database product based on price alone if
database products were the predominant part of the overall information
technology expenditures  But this is simply not the case. Software costs
(including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15% of
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware, operations
and maintenance, consulting and training.

I don't know about the remainder of you, but the cost of Oracle's software
is quickly eclipsing the cost of everything else.  Hence the beginnings of this
post, which I agree with.  In our company our yearly Oracle Support Agreement
renewal is the #3 cost item and the cost of a new Oracle license exceeds the
cost of the server it's going on.  Someone PLEASE give these guys a reality
check or else a good swift kick in the pants!!

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

We run our web servers on Oracle Standard Edition.

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Oracle vs DB2


I just bought 3 STANDARD UPC server licenses for our site. We saved
275K by
not using Enterprise. Email me if you want the details. Walt is
right, they
are lying to you. (The concept of trusting salespersons for
technical
issues is inherently wrong.)

HTH,
Todd Carlson
Oracle 8i Certified DBA
Bunge Corporation





Weaver,

WaltTo: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L   
wweaver@righ[EMAIL PROTECTED]

tnow.comcc:

Sent by: Subject: RE: Oracle vs
DB2 
root@fatcity.

com





04/24/2001

03:16 PM

Please

respond to

ORACLE-L









That's absolutely not true, Dennis. We've purchased Oracle Standard
Edition
for serving web pages, and no one at Oracle told us we could not.

I think you need to find some other salescritters. You're being
taken for a
ride.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 01:13 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
But, I believe your comparing apples to oranges.  DB2 UDB
Workgroup is
not
the equal of Oracle Enterprise.  If you want to compare apples 
apples,
try

Yes, but in order to put an Oracle database on the web, I HAVE TO
USE
ENTERPRISE EDITION! The salescritters say so. It has to be unlimited
users.
To repeat: I cannot (legally) put an Oracle database on an
internet-accessible web page unless it is an unlimited-user
(power-units-based) Enterprise edition version of Oracle. Let me put
it
another way: I HAVE TO USE ENTERPRISE EDITION!

Now, it may be that every salescritter I've talked to is wrong about
that,
but if so, what can I do? Reach through the phone, grab them by the
throat,
and demand answers? (Not to say I don't *want* to)

I'm not actually comparing apples to oranges if you look at it from
my POV:
I'm comparing the lowest cost to do what I want using Oracle, to the
lowest
cost to do what I want using DB2. If Oracle demands that I use
Enterprise
Edition with unlimited users, then that's their price.



Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing

Re:RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread dgoulet

So isn't PostGres, but neither is a close competitor.

Reply Separator
Author: Gene Sais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   4/24/2001 1:28 PM

hmmm, mysql is free, best price of all.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24/01 04:27PM 
At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant. YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Gene Sais
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Yexley Robert D SSgt AFIT/SCA

I too would love to see somebody give Oracle a reality check in regards to
the prices of their software, but as much as I hate to say it, I just don't
see it happening.  Why?  Because the ONLY reality check that Oracle is going
to actually LISTEN to and do something about would be for people to stop
using/buying their products.  And I just don't see that happening either.
In the enterprise data market, Oracle has the best product available (IMHO),
and I think most people, and especially including Oracle Corp., know this.
Based on that information alone, I just don't see them backing down their
prices when, as much as people hate paying, they still will, because it's
the best.  =(

-::YEX::-
)))

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Tim,

Thanks for the copy of the marketing speil, I had not heard that one
before.
 But, I'll take great exception to the claim that:

 It would make sense to select a database product based on price alone if
database products were the predominant part of the overall information
technology expenditures  But this is simply not the case. Software costs
(including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15%
of
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware,
operations
and maintenance, consulting and training.

I don't know about the remainder of you, but the cost of Oracle's
software
is quickly eclipsing the cost of everything else.  Hence the beginnings of
this
post, which I agree with.  In our company our yearly Oracle Support
Agreement
renewal is the #3 cost item and the cost of a new Oracle license exceeds the
cost of the server it's going on.  Someone PLEASE give these guys a reality
check or else a good swift kick in the pants!!

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Yexley Robert D SSgt AFIT/SCA
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Frank N. Pettinato

You are absolutely correct. Oracle's getting this price because they can. I
wonder how much market share they will lose before Larry switches things
around?

When I asked my salescritter about this he said Well we sure are selling
alot of licenses - Go figure...

Thanks,
Frank

-Original Message-
Patrice J
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Frank N. Pettinato
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Sharpe, Richard


Greetings Friends in California!

If you felt the earth shake, don't worry. It's not an earth quake, it
just Larry Ellison's reaction to the IBM-Informix deal. The man needs to
spend a lot less time picking fights with Bill and a lot more time paying
attention to his market, and from being end-runned. MS has money, but IBM 
prints the stuff.

Cheers!

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


trying again...

 From: Eric D. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:56:08 -0700
 Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2

 
 Reportedly what IBM did here some years ago, was sell a 
 mainframe hardware package (for a COBOL/VSAM package) within
 the University system's budget constraints.
 
 Turned out that to actually run the application, several
 millions of $ of additional goodies were needed.
 
 But, they got the original bid.
 
 Dealing with IBM mainframe sales critters (apparently recruited
 directly from some boot camp for counter terrorism?) was not
 exactly the same as dealing with DEC sales critters.
 
 
 
 On 24 Apr 2001, at 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It's that ancillary business you better watch out for!!  IBM is using
DB2
  as their Loss-Leader.
 
 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sharpe, Richard
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Mohan, Ross

|| When I asked my salescritter about this he said Well we 
|| sure are selling alot of licenses - Go figure...

LoL...you know what I think? I think there was an INTERNAL memo
circulated around Oracle sales that basically acknowledged the
problem, and decided that DAMAGE CONTROL would be to give each
complainant the FALSE IMPRESSION that they were the only one
with a complaint. This would tend to ISOLATE the customer, and
make them more likely to pay up than buck what they were
being told was the industry trend. 


|| 
|| Thanks,
|| Frank
|| 
|| -Original Message-
|| Patrice J
|| Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:45 AM
|| To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
|| 
|| 
|| Well,
|| 
|| This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
|| article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.
|| 
|| Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take 
|| more Oracle
|| courses!
|| 
|| I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that 
|| mean they will
|| gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?
|| 
|| Regards,
|| Patrice Boivin
|| Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
|| 
|| Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
|| Technology Services| Services technologiques
|| Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
|| Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO
|| 
|| E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
|| 
||  -Original Message-
||  From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
||  Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
||  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
||  Subject:Oracle vs DB2
|| 
||  Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
|| *not*
||  trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.
|| 
||  As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle 
|| vs DB2 vs
|| SQLServer
||  to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
|| significant
||  difference to us, dollar-wise.
|| 
||  With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to 
|| the internet
|| through
||  a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user 
|| enterprise license. We
|| had a
||  senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
|| question a
||  number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but 
|| he did not
|| deny it.
||  And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address 
|| the issue at
|| all.
|| 
||  Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our 
|| installation (your
||  mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.
|| 
||  IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB 
|| Workgroup edition
|| (1
||  user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a 
|| total price of
|| $6000
||  Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to 
|| this effect.
|| 
||  $6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.
|| 
||  I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure 
|| is out of line
|| with
||  market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.
|| 
|| 
|| 
||  Dennis Taylor
||  
||  Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
||  just figured out the joke.
|| 
||  --
||  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
||  --
||  Author: Dennis Taylor
||INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
||  Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: 
|| (858) 538-5051
||  San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
|| Lists
||  
|| 
||  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an 
|| E-Mail message
||  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 
|| 'ListGuru') and in
||  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
||  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed 
|| from).  You may
||  also send the HELP command for other information (like 
|| subscribing).
|| --
|| Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
|| --
|| Author: Boivin, Patrice J
||   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
|| Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
|| San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / 
|| Mailing Lists
|| 
|| To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
|| to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
|| the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
|| (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
|| also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
|| 
|| -- 
|| Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
|| -- 
|| Author: Frank N. Pettinato
||   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|| 
|| Fat City Network Services

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Eric D. Pierce

This sorta reminds me of the answer I got when I asked why
Oracle thought that they deserved all the extra money they
were going to get from increasing annual support costs during
the Oracle6 - Oracle7 days (aprx. 50% increase each year 
for at least a couple of years).

Oracle said that someone has to pay for all the extra
development costs for Oracle7. I suggested that besides the
Oracle6 customers (some of whom weren't even using Oracle7 
yet), perhaps the *investors* would also be a good source 
for such funding.  (duh?)

They didn't know about that! :)

ep



On 25 Apr 2001, at 6:49, (Frank N. Pettinato [EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled with 
alacrity and cogency:

Date sent:  Wed, 25 Apr 2001 06:49:43 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization:   Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California

 You are absolutely correct. Oracle's getting this price because they can. I
 wonder how much market share they will lose before Larry switches things
 around?
 
 When I asked my salescritter about this he said Well we sure are selling
 alot of licenses - Go figure...

...


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2 - Oracle lost on cost

2001-04-25 Thread Brian Wisniewski

The client I work for (for the next 2 weeks at least) just made the
decision to use UDB over Oracle due to the price of licenses from
Oracle.  And this is a startup with a big ol' pile of capital.  Go
figure, I thought startup's always picked the most expensive stuff.
They must be saving on the DB for the skating rink.

- Brian

--- Henry Poras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I guess they can make their money by targeting the high end and
 having a few
 high paying customers, or be more reasonable and have a broader base.
 I get
 the feeling that Larry's ego (psychoanalysis from a distance, ain't
 it
 wonderful) would drive him to both the $ and the broad base. If you
 are
 competing against Bill Gates, you not only need the money, but also
 the
 exposure. Everyone knows Windows, you can't have just the elite
 knowing
 about Oracle. So where does that put us in 6 months?
 
 Henry
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Brian Wisniewski
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Henry Poras

I guess they can make their money by targeting the high end and having a few
high paying customers, or be more reasonable and have a broader base. I get
the feeling that Larry's ego (psychoanalysis from a distance, ain't it
wonderful) would drive him to both the $ and the broad base. If you are
competing against Bill Gates, you not only need the money, but also the
exposure. Everyone knows Windows, you can't have just the elite knowing
about Oracle. So where does that put us in 6 months?

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I too would love to see somebody give Oracle a reality check in regards to
the prices of their software, but as much as I hate to say it, I just don't
see it happening.  Why?  Because the ONLY reality check that Oracle is going
to actually LISTEN to and do something about would be for people to stop
using/buying their products.  And I just don't see that happening either.
In the enterprise data market, Oracle has the best product available (IMHO),
and I think most people, and especially including Oracle Corp., know this.
Based on that information alone, I just don't see them backing down their
prices when, as much as people hate paying, they still will, because it's
the best.  =(

-::YEX::-
)))

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Tim,

Thanks for the copy of the marketing speil, I had not heard that one
before.
 But, I'll take great exception to the claim that:

 It would make sense to select a database product based on price alone if
database products were the predominant part of the overall information
technology expenditures  But this is simply not the case. Software costs
(including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15%
of
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware,
operations
and maintenance, consulting and training.

I don't know about the remainder of you, but the cost of Oracle's
software
is quickly eclipsing the cost of everything else.  Hence the beginnings of
this
post, which I agree with.  In our company our yearly Oracle Support
Agreement
renewal is the #3 cost item and the cost of a new Oracle license exceeds the
cost of the server it's going on.  Someone PLEASE give these guys a reality
check or else a good swift kick in the pants!!

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Yexley Robert D SSgt AFIT/SCA
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Weaver, Walt

I agree, MySQL is a good way to start out. That's what we did here. It's
fast and free. Our product runs with MySQL, SQL Server, and Oracle. The
MySQL version allows us to sell to companies that want to use our product
but could never afford an Oracle license.

But, when it comes to larger companies (such as Toyota, Motorola, Swissair,
etc.) that generate a lot of customer traffic with our product MySQL just
doesn't scale well. Data corruption is a constant problem, and that's where
Oracle comes in. It's stable, reliable, and the large companies that need
the reliability can actually afford the licensing.  :)

We also use Postgres here for some internal applications and it works very
well.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:50 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

true, but when cost is the decisive factor w/ a startup, go with the one of
the freebies.  if the company was too cheap to buy the right product, time
to find a company w/ deeper pockets.  now w/ ibm buying informix, merging w/
db2, they will have a new product called db4mix :).  the free db's are fun
to play with but their skills don't pay the bills.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/25/01 08:36AM 
So isn't PostGres, but neither is a close competitor.

Reply Separator
Author: Gene Sais [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   4/24/2001 1:28 PM

hmmm, mysql is free, best price of all.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am *not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Boivin, Patrice J

Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dan . Hubler



Why the enterprise license for Oracle?






Dennis Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 04/24/2001 10:57:11 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:


Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am *not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Murali Vallath

Boivin,

Not true, when Oracle purchased Rdb from Digital 10 years ago. This was the 
talk, Rdb will die in 7 years.

Today it is being enhanced every version/release.

SO DON'T KNOW, what IBM will do.

Murali Vallath


Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:45:27 -0800

Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Murali Vallath
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Weaver, Walt

Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Costs much less than $160,000, although still more than $6,000 Cdn.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana


Dennis Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 04/24/2001 10:57:11 AM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re:RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread dgoulet

Patrice,

I just read that from IBM's WEB site
(http://www.ibm.com/news/2001/04/24.phtml) for those interested.  Looks like the
DB market in the near future will be Oracle  DB2, with a little SQL*Server
sprinkled in for spice.  My retirement fund may get better, but will I be able
to survive the feeding frenzy that ensues???

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: Boivin; Patrice J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   4/24/2001 8:45 AM

Well,

This is on topic - www.wired.com http://www.wired.com  today has an
article re. IBM announced that it is buying Informix for $1Billion.

Ah, if only I had that kind of money myself - I could take more Oracle
courses!

I don't know what will happen with Informix then, does that mean they will
gobble it up and DB2 will be the only option in a couple of years?

Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
From:   Dennis Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Oracle vs DB2

Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am
*not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs
SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a
significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet
through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We
had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this
question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not
deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at
all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition
(1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of
$6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line
with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing
Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra

Now we know how Oracle saved a billion $$ ??

Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni  MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art !


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:57 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

[snip]
$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.

[snip]

*

This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above 
and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify ESPN at (860) 766-2000 and 
delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank you.

*

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jamadagni, Rajendra
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Tim Sawmiller
 because Oracle delivers a higher quality of service than DB2. IBM touts its 
lower database price, but why risk your business on DB2, a product with many hidden 
costs? 

 
 Technology Innovation Is Key 
By far, the largest hidden cost of running DB2 is IBM's low rate of innovation.  
Innovation is key to a robust but flexible IT infrastructure. Information systems must 
evolve constantly as end-user demand changes. They need to evolve rapidly to respond 
to business changes such as company acquisitions or unexpected competitive pressure. 
An IT infrastructure based on software products that lack innovation becomes legacy 
very rapidly. And legacy is expensive to maintain or replace. 
Oracle has been the database technology innovator for 20 years. In 1979, Oracle 
delivered the first commercial relational database. In 2001, Oracle delivers the first 
database caching technology that improves web performance and allows IT organizations 
to reduce hardware costs. Oracle has not stopped innovating over the past 20 years.  

Buying DB2 means buying into an infrastructure that is less advanced than your 
competitors' and that quickly will become legacy in no time.  In the long run, buying 
DB2 equals additional and unnecessary costs as systems need to be upgraded or replaced 
to reap of the business benefits of more innovative technology. 

 
 Customers Are The Real Proof 
Customer acceptance is the real proof, and customers are choosing Oracle: 
Oracle has been growing its software business at an average rate of 20% per year while 
IBM's software business has been flat or declining for nearly six years in a row. 
Customers vote with their pocketbooks and, clearly, they are voting for Oracle, not 
IBM. 
Oracle has a higher customer retention rate than IBM (AMR Research, November 2000) 
11% of IBM DB2 customers plan on switching to a different database over the next 2 
years. (AMR Research, November 2000) 
Oracle is the most commonly used database across all industries, with usage rates that 
are, on average, 3 to 4 times higher than IBM DB2 (AMR Research, November 2000) 
Oracle database is the most commonly used database for developers: a recent EvansData 
survey shows that 55% of developers use Oracle, only 25% use IBM DB2. 

The Oracle leadership fact page is on www.oracle.com 

  Oracle Worldwide Marketing  


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24/01 11:57AM 
Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am *not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Tim Sawmiller
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command

Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dan . Hubler



Maybe I am wrong here but..

My understanding is that you can use standard or enterprise for any
appication you wish.

If your application communicates with the Web/internet, you have to license
the
product based on UPU's;  they will not accept a named user license.

???






Dennis Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]@fatcity.com on 04/24/2001 01:22:56 PM

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:


At 09:31 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:


Why the enterprise license for Oracle?


Because that's what they require.


Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Re[2]:Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor

At 01:35 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
Dennis,

OK, but your sales critter is DEAD wrong.  We bought a Standard
edition from

Yep. Based on your statement, I checked with the critter. He says yes, you
can do it with Standard version. Which costs (ballpark) $33K Cdn for the
unlimited user version, vs $6K for DB2. Closer. Close enough that if you
already had a large investment in Oracle, you'd probably grit your teeth
and pay it.

The remaining issue as far as I'm concerned is the fact of having to pay
Oracle more $$ if I replace my server at any time, even if only with one
with a faster cpu.


Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor

At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant. YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor
 a global
e-commerce or customer support application on a system that must go offline
every week for maintenance? Who wants to run an HR system on a database
that compromises on data integrity? 
An application running on Oracle costs less to operate than an application
running on DB2 simply because Oracle delivers a higher quality of service
than DB2. IBM touts its lower database price, but why risk your business on
DB2, a product with many hidden costs? 

 
 Technology Innovation Is Key 
By far, the largest hidden cost of running DB2 is IBM's low rate of
innovation.  Innovation is key to a robust but flexible IT infrastructure.
Information systems must evolve constantly as end-user demand changes. They
need to evolve rapidly to respond to business changes such as company
acquisitions or unexpected competitive pressure. An IT infrastructure based
on software products that lack innovation becomes legacy very rapidly. And
legacy is expensive to maintain or replace. 
Oracle has been the database technology innovator for 20 years. In 1979,
Oracle delivered the first commercial relational database. In 2001, Oracle
delivers the first database caching technology that improves web
performance and allows IT organizations to reduce hardware costs. Oracle
has not stopped innovating over the past 20 years.  

Buying DB2 means buying into an infrastructure that is less advanced than
your competitors' and that quickly will become legacy in no time.  In the
long run, buying DB2 equals additional and unnecessary costs as systems
need to be upgraded or replaced to reap of the business benefits of more
innovative technology. 

 
 Customers Are The Real Proof 
Customer acceptance is the real proof, and customers are choosing Oracle: 
Oracle has been growing its software business at an average rate of 20%
per year while IBM's software business has been flat or declining for
nearly six years in a row. Customers vote with their pocketbooks and,
clearly, they are voting for Oracle, not IBM. 
Oracle has a higher customer retention rate than IBM (AMR Research,
November 2000) 
11% of IBM DB2 customers plan on switching to a different database over
the next 2 years. (AMR Research, November 2000) 
Oracle is the most commonly used database across all industries, with
usage rates that are, on average, 3 to 4 times higher than IBM DB2 (AMR
Research, November 2000) 
Oracle database is the most commonly used database for developers: a
recent EvansData survey shows that 55% of developers use Oracle, only 25%
use IBM DB2. 

The Oracle leadership fact page is on www.oracle.com 

  Oracle Worldwide Marketing  


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24/01 11:57AM 
Disclaimer: I am *not* trying to start a religious war, and I am *not*
trying to advocate DB2. I am simply offended. Thus this post.

As some may remember, I'm doing an evaluation of Oracle vs DB2 vs SQLServer
to determine our future direction. Here's a datum that makes a significant
difference to us, dollar-wise.

With Oracle, in order to make a database accessible to the internet through
a web page, you have to buy an unlimited-user enterprise license. We had a
senior sales person in our office yesterday, and we asked this question a
number of different ways. He bobbed and he weaved, but he did not deny it.
And the quote he supplied afterwards does not address the issue at all.

Cost of unlimited-user Enterprise version for our installation (your
mileage may vary) = Approx $160,000 Cdn.

IBM, for the same purpose, will sell you DB2 UDB Workgroup edition (1
user), and something called WE Internet Access, for a total price of $6000
Cdn. I have a written quote from an IBM salescritter to this effect.

$6000. $160,000. $6000. $160,000. Hm. Let me think.

I respectfully submit that Oracle's pricing structure is out of line with
market realities, and may have to undergo significant revision.



Dennis Taylor

Don't be fooled by old cliches - He who laughs last may have
just figured out the joke.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Tim Sawmiller
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Weaver, Walt

That's absolutely not true, Dennis. We've purchased Oracle Standard Edition
for serving web pages, and no one at Oracle told us we could not.

I think you need to find some other salescritters. You're being taken for a
ride.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 01:13 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
But, I believe your comparing apples to oranges.  DB2 UDB Workgroup is
not
the equal of Oracle Enterprise.  If you want to compare apples  apples,
try

Yes, but in order to put an Oracle database on the web, I HAVE TO USE
ENTERPRISE EDITION! The salescritters say so. It has to be unlimited users.
To repeat: I cannot (legally) put an Oracle database on an
internet-accessible web page unless it is an unlimited-user
(power-units-based) Enterprise edition version of Oracle. Let me put it
another way: I HAVE TO USE ENTERPRISE EDITION!

Now, it may be that every salescritter I've talked to is wrong about that,
but if so, what can I do? Reach through the phone, grab them by the throat,
and demand answers? (Not to say I don't *want* to)

I'm not actually comparing apples to oranges if you look at it from my POV:
I'm comparing the lowest cost to do what I want using Oracle, to the lowest
cost to do what I want using DB2. If Oracle demands that I use Enterprise
Edition with unlimited users, then that's their price.



Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Ed . Haskins

Dennis,

The IBM Sales Critter hit the nail on the head by saying:

that in some cases, IBM is *giving* DB2 away, if there's enough ancillary
business (hardware, consulting, etc).

It's that ancillary business you better watch out for!!  IBM is using DB2
as their Loss-Leader.

Ed Haskins
Oracle DBA
Verizon Wireless



-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:28 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is
a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant.
YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread TCarlson


I just bought 3 STANDARD UPC server licenses for our site. We saved 275K by
not using Enterprise. Email me if you want the details. Walt is right, they
are lying to you. (The concept of trusting salespersons for technical
issues is inherently wrong.)

HTH,
Todd Carlson
Oracle 8i Certified DBA
Bunge Corporation



   
 
Weaver,   
 
WaltTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L  
 
wweaver@righ[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
tnow.comcc:   
 
Sent by: Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2
 
root@fatcity.  
 
com
 
   
 
   
 
04/24/2001 
 
03:16 PM   
 
Please 
 
respond to 
 
ORACLE-L   
 
   
 
   
 




That's absolutely not true, Dennis. We've purchased Oracle Standard Edition
for serving web pages, and no one at Oracle told us we could not.

I think you need to find some other salescritters. You're being taken for a
ride.

--Walt Weaver
  Bozeman, Montana, USA

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


At 01:13 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
But, I believe your comparing apples to oranges.  DB2 UDB Workgroup is
not
the equal of Oracle Enterprise.  If you want to compare apples  apples,
try

Yes, but in order to put an Oracle database on the web, I HAVE TO USE
ENTERPRISE EDITION! The salescritters say so. It has to be unlimited users.
To repeat: I cannot (legally) put an Oracle database on an
internet-accessible web page unless it is an unlimited-user
(power-units-based) Enterprise edition version of Oracle. Let me put it
another way: I HAVE TO USE ENTERPRISE EDITION!

Now, it may be that every salescritter I've talked to is wrong about that,
but if so, what can I do? Reach through the phone, grab them by the throat,
and demand answers? (Not to say I don't *want* to)

I'm not actually comparing apples to oranges if you look at it from my POV:
I'm comparing the lowest cost to do what I want using Oracle, to the lowest
cost to do what I want using DB2. If Oracle demands that I use Enterprise
Edition with unlimited users, then that's their price.



Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Weaver, Walt
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California

RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Gene Sais

hmmm, mysql is free, best price of all.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24/01 04:27PM 
At 10:46 AM 4/24/01 -0800, you wrote:
Not true. You can use the Standard Edition for serving web pages. We're
doing it. 

Yep. I've corrected myself on that in another email.

One thing I don't get: it's $6,000 Cdn for a 1-user license, right? How is a
1-user license going to do you any good if you're serving web pages? Just
interested in how the WE Internet Access works.

The 1-user license + WE = a legal DB2 web-database. This according to the
IBM salescritter. Got it on paper, too. :-)


We had some IBM guys in here late last year, and they couldn't give us any
better pricing than what we could get Oracle Standard Edition for.

Times change. My salescritter is saying that in some cases, IBM is *giving*
DB2 away, if there's enough ancilliary business (hardware, consulting, etc).

I guess I should add a disclaimer to my rant at this point. We are a small
shop. I mean *SMALL* shop. 30 people in the company. 30K for a web database
may be peanuts for a fortune 500 company, but for us, it's significant. YMMV.




Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com 
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Gene Sais
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Eric D. Pierce

trying again...

 From: Eric D. Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:56:08 -0700
 Subject: RE: Oracle vs DB2

 
 Reportedly what IBM did here some years ago, was sell a 
 mainframe hardware package (for a COBOL/VSAM package) within
 the University system's budget constraints.
 
 Turned out that to actually run the application, several
 millions of $ of additional goodies were needed.
 
 But, they got the original bid.
 
 Dealing with IBM mainframe sales critters (apparently recruited
 directly from some boot camp for counter terrorism?) was not
 exactly the same as dealing with DEC sales critters.
 
 
 
 On 24 Apr 2001, at 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It's that ancillary business you better watch out for!!  IBM is using DB2
  as their Loss-Leader.
 
 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).