Re: simple question

2004-01-08 Thread oranew2004
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE labware_admin.truncate_tables( schema_owner IN VARCHAR2) AS
 r number(10);
BEGIN
FOR r IN (SELECT table_name FROM dba_tables WHERE owner=schema_owner) LOOP EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'truncate table schema_owner.'||r.table_name; END LOOP;
END; 


ERROR: Line 14 Column 55 PLS-00364: loop index variable 'R' use is invalid.


Any ideas?

Thank you!


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes

RE: simple question

2004-01-08 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F



Greg,

Try 
this:

create 
or replace procedure truncate_tables(in_owner in varchar2) 
is
BEGIN FOR r IN (SELECT table_name FROM dba_tables WHERE 
owner=in_owner) 
LOOP EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'truncate table' || in_owner || '.' || r.table_name; 
END LOOP;END;/


You 
will need to grant select on DBA_TABLES to the owner of this procedure. 
You may also need to grant ALTER ANY TABLE to the same user to allow you to 
perform the Truncate function. I forget exactly which priv you need to do 
this - but something extra needs to be granted to the owner of the procedure to 
perform the trancate function.

Good 
Luck

Tom 
Mercadante Oracle Certified 
Professional 

  -Original Message-From: Greg Sorrel 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:55 
  PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  simple question
  Hi!
  
  I need to wrap this SQL into SP where I can pass new owner name. 
  I'm planning create db table with all owners I need to pass.
  
  BEGIN FOR r IN (SELECT table_name FROM dba_tables WHERE 
  owner='TRAIN1') LOOP EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 
  'truncate table TRAIN1.'||r.table_name; END LOOP;END;/
  
  Thanks.
  
  Greg
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter 
  the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes


RE: simple question

2004-01-08 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F



Remove 
the 

r 
number(10);

and it 
should be fine.

Tom Mercadante Oracle Certified Professional 

  -Original Message-From: oranew2004 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:24 
  PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Re: 
  simple question
  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE 
  labware_admin.truncate_tables( 
  schema_owner IN VARCHAR2) 
  AS
   r number(10);
  BEGIN
  FOR r IN (SELECT table_name FROM dba_tables WHERE 
  owner=schema_owner) LOOP EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 
  'truncate table schema_owner.'||r.table_name; END LOOP;
  END; 
  
  
  ERROR: Line 14 Column 55 PLS-00364: loop index variable 'R' use is 
  invalid.
  
  
  Any ideas?
  
  Thank you!
  
  
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter 
  the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes


RE: simple question

2004-01-08 Thread Stephen.Lee
I'll add that if you have foreign keys, they will mess you up.  Here is an
old script I have in my stash that you can modify with info already provided
by others.

procedure truncate_all(code_word in varchar2 default 'XXX') is
   cursor c1 is select table_name,constraint_name from user_constraints
where constraint_type = 'R';
   cursor c2 is select table_name from user_tables;
   handle integer;
   rows integer;
begin
   if code_word != 'NUKE' then
  raise_application_error(-20001, 'WRONG MAGIC WORD, BUCKWHEAT.');
   end if;
   dbms_output.enable(10);
   handle := dbms_sql.open_cursor;
   for t in c1 loop
  dbms_sql.parse(handle,'alter table '||t.table_name||' disable
constraint '||t.constraint_name, dbms_sql.native);
  rows := dbms_sql.execute(handle);
   end loop;
   for t in c2 loop
  dbms_sql.parse(handle,'truncate table '||t.table_name,
dbms_sql.native);
  rows := dbms_sql.execute(handle);
   end loop;
   for t in c1 loop
  dbms_sql.parse(handle,'alter table '||t.table_name||' enable
constraint '||t.constraint_name, dbms_sql.native);
  rows := dbms_sql.execute(handle);
   end loop;
exception
   when others then
  dbms_output.put_line(SQLCODE||': '||SQLERRM);
end;
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: simple question

2004-01-08 Thread Mladen Gogala
Why do you have r declared as number(10)?
On 01/08/2004 03:24:25 PM, oranew2004 wrote:
 CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE labware_admin.truncate_tables
 (
 schema_ownerIN VARCHAR2
 ) 
 AS
r number(10);
 BEGIN
 FOR r IN (SELECT table_name FROM dba_tables WHERE owner=schema_owner)
   LOOP
 EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'truncate table schema_owner.'||r.table_name;
   END LOOP;
 END;  
  
  
 ERROR:  Line 14 Column 55 PLS-00364: loop index variable 'R' use is invalid.
  
  
 Any ideas?
  
 Thank you!
  
  
 
 
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes

--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Mladen Gogala
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Re: DDLs -- was Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-25 Thread Jonathan Lewis

My point wasn't to pick any particular detail
of any particular example . I was merely making
the point that whilst the concept of DDL without
commits seems to be straightforward, the requirement
for designing something that could analyse and handle
all the consequent errors that might be a non-trivial
problem.



Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Coming soon a new one-day tutorial:
Cost Based Optimisation
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )

UK___March
USA_(FL)_May


Next Seminar dates:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )

USA_(CA, TX)_August


The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html


-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 January 2003 16:40



Take your first example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
 -- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

Why does Oracle HAVE to commit when the DROP TABLE is issued ?
What if the INSERT had been issued by another session ?  Would
the DROP TABLE go through in this session ?
The self-deadlock could be handled as an Error -- a Transaction
error,
with a message like cannot drop table when transaction is active in
current session.
A duhveloper who has written a very long-winded .SQL file or
procedure
and tries to drop a Table when he has an active transaction should be
caught and errored -- he shouldn't be allowed to drop his own
table, he
has made a logical error.

Take the second example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
 -- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

If the DROP  TABLE may have to wait for another user who has a lock
on T2,
why should the INSERT INTO T1 be committed ?  Our user hasn't
completed
his transaction yet.

It all depends on what you mean by a Transaction.  The way Oracle
has
written DDLs, a Transaction ends and is committed when the next DDL
is issued.  But that may not be a logical transaction in the real
world.

My point is not that the DROP TABLE should be roll-backable.  The
DROP
TABLE itself must always commit it's own statement. --- it's own
statement.
That is to ensure that a third user does not see inconsistency when
running
a transaction accessing T1.  But why should the DROP TABLE explicitly
commit the previous statement ?  In your example, you have shown that
an inconsistency may arise when a DROP is issued on a table with an
outstanding transaction.

But take the case where :
INSERT INTO T10  values ('a');
-- now I want to, for the heck of it, or bec'ose I'm a bad programmer
...
DROP TABLE XYZ ;
-- oops, my INSERT INTO T10 should be rolled back
-- but the Drop XYZ is independent
ROLLBACK;

Here, unfortunately, the DROP TABLE XYZ had already committed the
INSERT
INTO T10.
I didn't want that !
It would have been better if this DROP TABLE XYZ was an Autonomous
Transaction.
But in the first example, the DROP TABLE T1 should return an error.
So, the Oracle Kernel must have some more complexity to see if
there's any
outstanding
transaction in the current session [it already checks for other
sessions
because they
hold TM locks on the Table !] are pending against the same table
being dropped.

Hemant



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jonathan Lewis
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




DDLs -- was Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-24 Thread Hemant K Chitale

Take your first example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
-- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

Why does Oracle HAVE to commit when the DROP TABLE is issued ?
What if the INSERT had been issued by another session ?  Would
the DROP TABLE go through in this session ?
The self-deadlock could be handled as an Error -- a Transaction error,
with a message like cannot drop table when transaction is active in 
current session.
A duhveloper who has written a very long-winded .SQL file or procedure
and tries to drop a Table when he has an active transaction should be
caught and errored -- he shouldn't be allowed to drop his own table, he
has made a logical error.

Take the second example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
-- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

If the DROP  TABLE may have to wait for another user who has a lock on T2,
why should the INSERT INTO T1 be committed ?  Our user hasn't completed
his transaction yet.

It all depends on what you mean by a Transaction.  The way Oracle has
written DDLs, a Transaction ends and is committed when the next DDL
is issued.  But that may not be a logical transaction in the real world.

My point is not that the DROP TABLE should be roll-backable.  The DROP
TABLE itself must always commit it's own statement. --- it's own statement.
That is to ensure that a third user does not see inconsistency when running
a transaction accessing T1.  But why should the DROP TABLE explicitly
commit the previous statement ?  In your example, you have shown that
an inconsistency may arise when a DROP is issued on a table with an
outstanding transaction.

But take the case where :
INSERT INTO T10  values ('a');
-- now I want to, for the heck of it, or bec'ose I'm a bad programmer ...
DROP TABLE XYZ ;
-- oops, my INSERT INTO T10 should be rolled back
-- but the Drop XYZ is independent
ROLLBACK;

Here, unfortunately, the DROP TABLE XYZ had already committed the INSERT 
INTO T10.
I didn't want that !
It would have been better if this DROP TABLE XYZ was an Autonomous Transaction.
But in the first example, the DROP TABLE T1 should return an error.
So, the Oracle Kernel must have some more complexity to see if there's any 
outstanding
transaction in the current session [it already checks for other sessions 
because they
hold TM locks on the Table !] are pending against the same table being dropped.

Hemant

At 09:50 AM 23-01-03 -0800, you wrote:

One question to ask is whether whether all DDL
use the same strategy. Similarly, if you have
multiple code paths for do a ddl call how much
more risk of error do you introduce to the kernel.
Finally how do you get a consistent error response
to the end user if the error condition of apparently
identical events can fail in extremely different ways.

Consider the complexities of finding a consistent
kernel level approach to:

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
-- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
-- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;



Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Coming soon a new one-day tutorial:
Cost Based Optimisation
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )

Next Seminar dates:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )

England__January 21/23
USA_(CA, TX)_August


The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html





-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 January 2003 16:31


Arup,
 I see your point and agree that the DDL should be an autonomous tx.
Perhaps an enhancement request is in order? Since Oracle has the
autonomous
tx code, integrating into the kernel should be considered...perhaps
for
Oracle 38i?
 In the absence of that change, I must disagree and say that ddl must
issue a commit. If you look at a combination of your example and
mine, the
problem of waiting transactions still exists. In order to create a
table,
space must be allocated. Again, if fet$ contains only 1 row for the
particular file where the table is to be created, there is a
potential for a
serious locking problem.

Dan


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Jonathan Lewis
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


Hemant K Chitale
My web site page is :  

RE: DDLs -- was Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-24 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
Hemant,

My guess is that Oracle, at some point in time long ago, decided that DDL's
and DML's should not be mixed together.  Because they could not (or did not
want to) deal with the issue, they decided to perform an implicit commit
before any DDL statement was issued.  Case closed.  This is the way it was
done.


Things have changed in the (more than??) 10 years that this code was
written.  We are all smarter and have much more experience in what we would
like to see happen, rather than how it is currently coded.  Could Oracle
change this code?  Absolutely.  Will they?  Only if enough people ask for it
to be changed.  Would I like to see it changed?  No.  I really don't see the
need.  I think DDL and DML are two different things and should not be mixed
together.  If they are mixed together, then developers need to learn how it
works and deal with it.

just my 2 cents.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Take your first example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
 -- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

Why does Oracle HAVE to commit when the DROP TABLE is issued ?
What if the INSERT had been issued by another session ?  Would
the DROP TABLE go through in this session ?
The self-deadlock could be handled as an Error -- a Transaction error,
with a message like cannot drop table when transaction is active in 
current session.
A duhveloper who has written a very long-winded .SQL file or procedure
and tries to drop a Table when he has an active transaction should be
caught and errored -- he shouldn't be allowed to drop his own table, he
has made a logical error.

Take the second example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
 -- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

If the DROP  TABLE may have to wait for another user who has a lock on T2,
why should the INSERT INTO T1 be committed ?  Our user hasn't completed
his transaction yet.

It all depends on what you mean by a Transaction.  The way Oracle has
written DDLs, a Transaction ends and is committed when the next DDL
is issued.  But that may not be a logical transaction in the real world.

My point is not that the DROP TABLE should be roll-backable.  The DROP
TABLE itself must always commit it's own statement. --- it's own statement.
That is to ensure that a third user does not see inconsistency when running
a transaction accessing T1.  But why should the DROP TABLE explicitly
commit the previous statement ?  In your example, you have shown that
an inconsistency may arise when a DROP is issued on a table with an
outstanding transaction.

But take the case where :
INSERT INTO T10  values ('a');
-- now I want to, for the heck of it, or bec'ose I'm a bad programmer ...
DROP TABLE XYZ ;
-- oops, my INSERT INTO T10 should be rolled back
-- but the Drop XYZ is independent
ROLLBACK;

Here, unfortunately, the DROP TABLE XYZ had already committed the INSERT 
INTO T10.
I didn't want that !
It would have been better if this DROP TABLE XYZ was an Autonomous
Transaction.
But in the first example, the DROP TABLE T1 should return an error.
So, the Oracle Kernel must have some more complexity to see if there's any 
outstanding
transaction in the current session [it already checks for other sessions 
because they
hold TM locks on the Table !] are pending against the same table being
dropped.

Hemant

At 09:50 AM 23-01-03 -0800, you wrote:

One question to ask is whether whether all DDL
use the same strategy. Similarly, if you have
multiple code paths for do a ddl call how much
more risk of error do you introduce to the kernel.
Finally how do you get a consistent error response
to the end user if the error condition of apparently
identical events can fail in extremely different ways.

Consider the complexities of finding a consistent
kernel level approach to:

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
 -- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
 -- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;



Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Coming soon a new one-day tutorial:
Cost Based Optimisation
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )

Next Seminar dates:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )

England__January 21/23
USA_(CA, TX)_August


The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html





-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 January 2003 16:31


 Arup,
  I see your point and agree that the DDL should be an autonomous tx.
 Perhaps an enhancement request is in order? Since Oracle has the
autonomous
 tx code, integrating into the kernel should be considered...perhaps
for
 Oracle 38i?
  In the absence of that change, I must 

RE: DDLs -- was Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-24 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Tom - I think you've nailed it. Think of the design decisions that some of
Oracle's competitors made in the early days and how silly they seem in
retrospect. Anyone remember the row-locking vs. block-locking wars?
   The other aspect that many people don't think of if they have never
worked in a vendor's development staff is inertia. You as a developer are
assigned a list of tasks which is usually larger than you can accomplish.
Marketing bases those tasks on 1) which features will get more customers or
2) what customers are howling about -- where is the ROI? Changing how the
kernel works is a high-risk business, so I think you are probably stuck with
the way it works, even if you feel it is inconsistent.
   If Oracle did go back and fix stuff in this area, there may be customer
scripts that rely on this behavior, even if we feel it is inconsistent. 

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hemant,

My guess is that Oracle, at some point in time long ago, decided that DDL's
and DML's should not be mixed together.  Because they could not (or did not
want to) deal with the issue, they decided to perform an implicit commit
before any DDL statement was issued.  Case closed.  This is the way it was
done.


Things have changed in the (more than??) 10 years that this code was
written.  We are all smarter and have much more experience in what we would
like to see happen, rather than how it is currently coded.  Could Oracle
change this code?  Absolutely.  Will they?  Only if enough people ask for it
to be changed.  Would I like to see it changed?  No.  I really don't see the
need.  I think DDL and DML are two different things and should not be mixed
together.  If they are mixed together, then developers need to learn how it
works and deal with it.

just my 2 cents.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Take your first example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
 -- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

Why does Oracle HAVE to commit when the DROP TABLE is issued ?
What if the INSERT had been issued by another session ?  Would
the DROP TABLE go through in this session ?
The self-deadlock could be handled as an Error -- a Transaction error,
with a message like cannot drop table when transaction is active in 
current session.
A duhveloper who has written a very long-winded .SQL file or procedure
and tries to drop a Table when he has an active transaction should be
caught and errored -- he shouldn't be allowed to drop his own table, he
has made a logical error.

Take the second example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
 -- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

If the DROP  TABLE may have to wait for another user who has a lock on T2,
why should the INSERT INTO T1 be committed ?  Our user hasn't completed
his transaction yet.

It all depends on what you mean by a Transaction.  The way Oracle has
written DDLs, a Transaction ends and is committed when the next DDL
is issued.  But that may not be a logical transaction in the real world.

My point is not that the DROP TABLE should be roll-backable.  The DROP
TABLE itself must always commit it's own statement. --- it's own statement.
That is to ensure that a third user does not see inconsistency when running
a transaction accessing T1.  But why should the DROP TABLE explicitly
commit the previous statement ?  In your example, you have shown that
an inconsistency may arise when a DROP is issued on a table with an
outstanding transaction.

But take the case where :
INSERT INTO T10  values ('a');
-- now I want to, for the heck of it, or bec'ose I'm a bad programmer ...
DROP TABLE XYZ ;
-- oops, my INSERT INTO T10 should be rolled back
-- but the Drop XYZ is independent
ROLLBACK;

Here, unfortunately, the DROP TABLE XYZ had already committed the INSERT 
INTO T10.
I didn't want that !
It would have been better if this DROP TABLE XYZ was an Autonomous
Transaction.
But in the first example, the DROP TABLE T1 should return an error.
So, the Oracle Kernel must have some more complexity to see if there's any 
outstanding
transaction in the current session [it already checks for other sessions 
because they
hold TM locks on the Table !] are pending against the same table being
dropped.

Hemant

At 09:50 AM 23-01-03 -0800, you wrote:

One question to ask is whether whether all DDL
use the same strategy. Similarly, if you have
multiple code paths for do a ddl call how much
more risk of error do you introduce to the kernel.
Finally how do you get a consistent error response
to the end user if the error condition of apparently
identical events can fail in extremely different ways.

Consider the complexities of finding a consistent
kernel level approach to:

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
 -- 

RE: DDLs -- was Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-24 Thread Jared . Still
 I think DDL and DML are two different things and should not be mixed
 together.  If they are mixed together, then developers need to learn how 
it
 works and deal with it.

And there you have it.

If you need DDL in your code, isolate it in an anonymous transaction, or 
just be
sure that you are at a safe commit point.

jared





Mercadante, Thomas F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 01/24/2003 09:34 AM
 Please respond to ORACLE-L

 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:RE: DDLs --  was Re: simple question on DDL


Hemant,

My guess is that Oracle, at some point in time long ago, decided that 
DDL's
and DML's should not be mixed together.  Because they could not (or did 
not
want to) deal with the issue, they decided to perform an implicit commit
before any DDL statement was issued.  Case closed.  This is the way it was
done.


Things have changed in the (more than??) 10 years that this code was
written.  We are all smarter and have much more experience in what we 
would
like to see happen, rather than how it is currently coded.  Could Oracle
change this code?  Absolutely.  Will they?  Only if enough people ask for 
it
to be changed.  Would I like to see it changed?  No.  I really don't see 
the
need.  I think DDL and DML are two different things and should not be 
mixed
together.  If they are mixed together, then developers need to learn how 
it
works and deal with it.

just my 2 cents.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




RE: DDLs -- was Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-24 Thread Hemant K Chitale

Agreed.  There's a lot of code out there that was developed considering the
way Oracle handled DDL and DML specifically.
Although I would have liked Oracle to handle DDL as an Autonomous Transaction
and provide an error message for the scenario in the first example, I guess
it might be too late to change the kernel now.
As Arup said, hopefully Oracle 38i will allow us to mix DDL with DML
and yet have DDL as Autonomous Transactions.

When Oracle didn't have Sequences before Oracle6, people wrote code
to SELECT MAX(KEY)+1.   There might still be a few developers and
few pieces of code doing precisely that instead of using a sequence [of
course, development which is RDBMS-independent might not use an
Oracle Sequence].

I was just expressing a wish that Oracle could have done DDL and DML
better.We are stuck with QWERTY and we are stuck with DDL
that does an Auto-Commit.

Hemant


At 10:49 AM 24-01-03 -0800, you wrote:

Tom - I think you've nailed it. Think of the design decisions that some of
Oracle's competitors made in the early days and how silly they seem in
retrospect. Anyone remember the row-locking vs. block-locking wars?
   The other aspect that many people don't think of if they have never
worked in a vendor's development staff is inertia. You as a developer are
assigned a list of tasks which is usually larger than you can accomplish.
Marketing bases those tasks on 1) which features will get more customers or
2) what customers are howling about -- where is the ROI? Changing how the
kernel works is a high-risk business, so I think you are probably stuck with
the way it works, even if you feel it is inconsistent.
   If Oracle did go back and fix stuff in this area, there may be customer
scripts that rely on this behavior, even if we feel it is inconsistent.

-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hemant,

My guess is that Oracle, at some point in time long ago, decided that DDL's
and DML's should not be mixed together.  Because they could not (or did not
want to) deal with the issue, they decided to perform an implicit commit
before any DDL statement was issued.  Case closed.  This is the way it was
done.


Things have changed in the (more than??) 10 years that this code was
written.  We are all smarter and have much more experience in what we would
like to see happen, rather than how it is currently coded.  Could Oracle
change this code?  Absolutely.  Will they?  Only if enough people ask for it
to be changed.  Would I like to see it changed?  No.  I really don't see the
need.  I think DDL and DML are two different things and should not be mixed
together.  If they are mixed together, then developers need to learn how it
works and deal with it.

just my 2 cents.

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:30 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Take your first example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
 -- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

Why does Oracle HAVE to commit when the DROP TABLE is issued ?
What if the INSERT had been issued by another session ?  Would
the DROP TABLE go through in this session ?
The self-deadlock could be handled as an Error -- a Transaction error,
with a message like cannot drop table when transaction is active in
current session.
A duhveloper who has written a very long-winded .SQL file or procedure
and tries to drop a Table when he has an active transaction should be
caught and errored -- he shouldn't be allowed to drop his own table, he
has made a logical error.

Take the second example :
insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
 -- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

If the DROP  TABLE may have to wait for another user who has a lock on T2,
why should the INSERT INTO T1 be committed ?  Our user hasn't completed
his transaction yet.

It all depends on what you mean by a Transaction.  The way Oracle has
written DDLs, a Transaction ends and is committed when the next DDL
is issued.  But that may not be a logical transaction in the real world.

My point is not that the DROP TABLE should be roll-backable.  The DROP
TABLE itself must always commit it's own statement. --- it's own statement.
That is to ensure that a third user does not see inconsistency when running
a transaction accessing T1.  But why should the DROP TABLE explicitly
commit the previous statement ?  In your example, you have shown that
an inconsistency may arise when a DROP is issued on a table with an
outstanding transaction.

But take the case where :
INSERT INTO T10  values ('a');
-- now I want to, for the heck of it, or bec'ose I'm a bad programmer ...
DROP TABLE XYZ ;
-- oops, my INSERT INTO T10 should be rolled back
-- but the Drop XYZ is independent
ROLLBACK;

Here, unfortunately, the DROP TABLE XYZ had already committed the INSERT
INTO T10.
I didn't want that !
It 

Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Markus Reger
SORRY - this was the wrong list. the other pertinent list is one about controlling 
machines via a DDL protocol and a demon called the alike.

kr mr

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/22/03 16:49 PM 
hi
what's your exact question?
you mean autocommit like in database applications?
what tool are you using to observe or redard to this phenomenon?

the erd-demon has to send some info via rs232 to make the amplifier -called booster - 
work. no info implies no current on the tracks. kind of answwer you want?

kr mr



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/22/03 13:03 PM 
Hi friends

Why DDL statements performs auto commit ? What is the exact reason behind
that one?
Anyone can share his/her opinions!!

Thanks  regards
BanarasiBabu
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: BanarasiBabu Tippa
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Markus Reger
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Markus Reger
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Rachel Carmichael
remember this functionality of committing before a DDL statement has
been around from the beginning. Autonomous transactions have not. It
may simply be a case of Oracle not getting around to adding that change
to the kernel code.

Or, as Kirti quoted from Tom Kyte, that might just be the way they want
it to work.


--- Arup Nanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dan,
 
 If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary
 tables 
 have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the 
 transaction.
 
 For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1
 
 step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
 step 2: create table t2
 step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
 step 4: rollback
 
 At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl
 create 
 table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction
 should 
 have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The
 DDL 
 broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there.
 The data 
 dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that
 commit 
 could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same
 
 transaction the user issued.
 
 The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a
 commit. 
 This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to
 its 
 seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?
 
 Arup
 
 From: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by 
 mc1-f3.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed,
 22 Jan 
 2003 15:13:04 -0800
 Received: from fatcity.UUCP (uucp@localhost)by newsfeed.cts.com 
 (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id PAA16552;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:11:42 -0800
 (PST)
 Received: by fatcity.com (26-Feb-2001/v1.0g-b72/bab) via UUCP id
 00537F3B; 
 Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
 X-Sender: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
 X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 72; ListGuru (c) 1996-2001 Bruce A.
 Bergman
 Precedence: bulk
 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 23:13:04.0174 (UTC) 
 FILETIME=[D0E4CCE0:01C2C26B]
 
 Don't forget that extent allocation also affects the extent map for
 the
 segment and possibly the high water mark. The hwm can be set without
 allocating another extent and allocation of an extent may not alter
 the hwm
 (if you manually allocate an extent). If I deallocate space from an
 object,
 I will alter the  rows in fet$ and uet$ but not update the hwm. Make
 sense?
 
 As for the ATOMICITY of the transaction, this is usually used to
 describe
 the changes to data of interest. I don't think it is used to
 describe any
 underlying data dictionary changes. Thus the answer is Yes (for 99%
 of the
 Oracle techies) and No (for the 1% of us who really like to know
 exactly
 what is going on under the covers).
 
 Thanks for a great question, it brought up a subject that I had
 never
 thought about. Yee-Haw! I learned someting today!
 
 Cheers,
 Dan
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:04 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 
 Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes to the
 data
 dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to me.
 Maybe,
 thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high water
 mark. Coz
 changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was rolled
 back.
 
 I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the same
 question,
 and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC
 as
 possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, does
 that mean
 the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a
 rollback,
 changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is
 rolled
 back.
 
 Thanks
 Raj
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Fink, Dan
 
  Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple
 recipients of 
 list
 ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .comcc:
 
  Sent by: Subject: RE: simple
 question 
 on
 DDL
  root@fatcity.
 
  com
 
 
 
 
 
  January 22,
 
  2003 02:16 PM
 
  Please
 
  respond to
 
  ORACLE-L
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation
 is
 required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional
 extents
 (updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in
 the data
 dictionary

Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Ora NT DBA
  

that mean


  the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a
  

rollback,


  changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is
  

rolled


  back.

Thanks
Raj






"Fink, Dan"

Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple
  

recipients of 


  list
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com        cc:

    Sent by: Subject: RE: simple
  

question 


  on
DDL
root@fatcity.

com





January 22,

2003 02:16 PM

Please

respond to

ORACLE-L









Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation
  

is


  required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional
  

extents


  (updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in
  

the data


  dictionary). These updates to the data dictionary are implicitly
  

committed,


  even if you issue an explicit rollback for the insert statement.
  

Imagine if


  the dd changes are not immediately committed. Let's say another tx
  

(we'll


  call tx2) needs to allocate an extent in the same datafile.  If fet$
contains only a single row for the file requested, then tx1 will
  

have an


  exclusive lock on the row. tx2 needs to also lock the row
  

exclusively in


  order to update it. Thus, tx2 would wait until tx1 has completed and
released the lock. In the meantime, any transaction that needs to
  

allocate


  a
new extent in that file will have to wait...and wait...and wait.

A different strategy is to commit the changes to fet$ and uet$
  

immediately.


  Then the next tx can access the row and grab space. While this could
  

result


  in an overallocation of space if the tx is rolled back, it does not
  

block


  other txs. If space was allocated to an object, and the tx failed,
  

there is


  a strong probability that this space will be used at some point in
  

the


  future.

It seems that the tradeoff here is that the access to the data
  

dictionary


  
  === message truncated ===


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
  






Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Jared Still

It could also have something to do with the status changes
of objects that may be affected by the DDL, though I am
speculating here.

Jared

On Thursday 23 January 2003 02:58, you wrote:
 remember this functionality of committing before a DDL statement has
 been around from the beginning. Autonomous transactions have not. It
 may simply be a case of Oracle not getting around to adding that change
 to the kernel code.

 Or, as Kirti quoted from Tom Kyte, that might just be the way they want
 it to work.

 --- Arup Nanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Dan,
 
  If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary
  tables
  have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the
  transaction.
 
  For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1
 
  step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
  step 2: create table t2
  step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
  step 4: rollback
 
  At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl
  create
  table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction
  should
  have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The
  DDL
  broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there.
  The data
  dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that
  commit
  could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same
 
  transaction the user issued.
 
  The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a
  commit.
  This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to
  its
  seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?
 
  Arup
 
  From: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
  Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by
  mc1-f3.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed,
 
  22 Jan
 
  2003 15:13:04 -0800
  Received: from fatcity.UUCP (uucp@localhost)by newsfeed.cts.com
  (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id PAA16552;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:11:42 -0800
 
  (PST)
 
  Received: by fatcity.com (26-Feb-2001/v1.0g-b72/bab) via UUCP id
 
  00537F3B;
 
  Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
  Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
  X-Sender: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
  X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 72; ListGuru (c) 1996-2001 Bruce A.
 
  Bergman
 
  Precedence: bulk
  Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 23:13:04.0174 (UTC)
  FILETIME=[D0E4CCE0:01C2C26B]
  
  Don't forget that extent allocation also affects the extent map for
 
  the
 
  segment and possibly the high water mark. The hwm can be set without
  allocating another extent and allocation of an extent may not alter
 
  the hwm
 
  (if you manually allocate an extent). If I deallocate space from an
 
  object,
 
  I will alter the  rows in fet$ and uet$ but not update the hwm. Make
 
  sense?
 
  As for the ATOMICITY of the transaction, this is usually used to
 
  describe
 
  the changes to data of interest. I don't think it is used to
 
  describe any
 
  underlying data dictionary changes. Thus the answer is Yes (for 99%
 
  of the
 
  Oracle techies) and No (for the 1% of us who really like to know
 
  exactly
 
  what is going on under the covers).
  
  Thanks for a great question, it brought up a subject that I had
 
  never
 
  thought about. Yee-Haw! I learned someting today!
  
  Cheers,
  Dan
  
  -Original Message-
  Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:04 PM
  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
  
  
  
  Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes to the
 
  data
 
  dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to me.
 
  Maybe,
 
  thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high water
 
  mark. Coz
 
  changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was rolled
 
  back.
 
  I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the same
 
  question,
 
  and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC
 
  as
 
  possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, does
 
  that mean
 
  the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a
 
  rollback,
 
  changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is
 
  rolled
 
  back.
  
  Thanks
  Raj
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Fink, Dan
  
   Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple
 
  recipients of
 
  list
  ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .comcc:
  
   Sent by: Subject: RE: simple
 
  question
 
  on
  DDL
   root@fatcity.
  
   com

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Fink, Dan
Arup,
I see your point and agree that the DDL should be an autonomous tx.
Perhaps an enhancement request is in order? Since Oracle has the autonomous
tx code, integrating into the kernel should be considered...perhaps for
Oracle 38i?
In the absence of that change, I must disagree and say that ddl must
issue a commit. If you look at a combination of your example and mine, the
problem of waiting transactions still exists. In order to create a table,
space must be allocated. Again, if fet$ contains only 1 row for the
particular file where the table is to be created, there is a potential for a
serious locking problem. 

Dan

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Dan,

If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary tables 
have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the 
transaction.

For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1

step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
step 2: create table t2
step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
step 4: rollback

At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl create 
table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction should

have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The DDL 
broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there. The data 
dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that commit

could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same 
transaction the user issued.

The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a commit. 
This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to its 
seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?

Arup

From: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by 
mc1-f3.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan

2003 15:13:04 -0800
Received: from fatcity.UUCP (uucp@localhost)by newsfeed.cts.com 
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id PAA16552;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:11:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fatcity.com (26-Feb-2001/v1.0g-b72/bab) via UUCP id 00537F3B; 
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
X-Sender: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 72; ListGuru (c) 1996-2001 Bruce A. Bergman
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 23:13:04.0174 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[D0E4CCE0:01C2C26B]

Don't forget that extent allocation also affects the extent map for the
segment and possibly the high water mark. The hwm can be set without
allocating another extent and allocation of an extent may not alter the hwm
(if you manually allocate an extent). If I deallocate space from an object,
I will alter the  rows in fet$ and uet$ but not update the hwm. Make sense?

As for the ATOMICITY of the transaction, this is usually used to describe
the changes to data of interest. I don't think it is used to describe any
underlying data dictionary changes. Thus the answer is Yes (for 99% of the
Oracle techies) and No (for the 1% of us who really like to know exactly
what is going on under the covers).

Thanks for a great question, it brought up a subject that I had never
thought about. Yee-Haw! I learned someting today!

Cheers,
Dan

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes to the data
dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to me. Maybe,
thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high water mark. Coz
changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was rolled back.

I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the same question,
and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC as
possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, does that mean
the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a rollback,
changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is rolled
back.

Thanks
Raj






 Fink, Dan

 Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple recipients of 
list
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 .comcc:

 Sent by: Subject: RE: simple question 
on
DDL
 root@fatcity.

 com





 January 22,

 2003 02:16 PM

 Please

 respond to

 ORACLE-L

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Rajesh . Rao

Well, then even Tom's vague on this one.

DDL locks are automatically placed against objects during a DDL operation
to protect them from changes by other sessions.
Well, then even an insert statement makes changes to DD objects. Ain't
locks taken then?

DDL Starts by commiting.
Why not declare a savepoint, and later, rollback to that savepoint?

And theres another DBA friend, who speculates that the reason could be that
DDL statements always take an exclusive lock on the underlying object. If
that transaction is not ended implicitly, the locks would be waiting
forever until the user intervenes. This could have serious consequences on
the database, with a potential for deadlocks. Ahem. This by far, seems to
be the most convincing answer to me.

Ok. Maybe, thats just the way its coded. The point I have understood from
this thread, is that a commit is performed to protect the data dictionary.
And DML statements are not truly atomic, for while it maybe possible for an
DML statement to roll back, there are some changes that are indeed
committed.

Thanks
Raj




   
   
Deshpande, Kirti 
   
kirti.deshpande@veTo: Multiple recipients of list 
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rizon.com cc: 
   
Sent by:   Subject: RE: simple question on DDL 
   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
   
   
   
   
   
January 22, 2003   
   
10:33 PM   
   
Please respond to  
   
ORACLE-L   
   
   
   
   
   




Dan addressed this very well in his earlier post...

Here is what Tom Kyte says in his book (Expert one-on-one Oracle):
DDL locks are automatically placed against objects during a DDL operation
to protect them from changes by other sessions.
DDL locks are held for the duration of the DDL statement, and are released
immediately afterwards. This is done, in effect, by always wrapping DDL
statements in implicit commits (or commit/rollback pair). It is for this
reason that DDL always commits in Oracle..
So, DDL will always commit, even if it is unsuccessful. DDL starts by
committing - be aware of this. It commits first so that if it has to
rollback, it will not roll back your transaction. If you execute DDL, it'll
make permanent any outstanding work you have performed, even if the DDL is
not successful..


Refer to page 119...

- Kirti

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Dan,

If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary tables

have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the
transaction.

For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1

step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
step 2: create table t2
step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
step 4: rollback

At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl create
table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction
should
have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The DDL
broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there. The data

dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that
commit
could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same
transaction the user issued.

The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a commit.

This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to its
seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?

Arup


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Hemant K Chitale

I tend to agree with the argument that's the way they wrote it.
If I remember correctly, DDL always commits the current transaction
in the session, even back in Oracle5 [and earlier ?] days.  Most likely
they couldn't write autonomous transactions then.
That autonomous transactions have been available to us since 8i
doesn't mean that autonomous transactions may not have been possible
within the kernel earlier.  I always think that the SCN mechanism is
like a sequence and has been around since before Oracle6 but
sequences were available to us only in Oracle6.

Hemant

At 06:54 AM 23-01-03 -0800, you wrote:


Well, then even Tom's vague on this one.

DDL locks are automatically placed against objects during a DDL operation
to protect them from changes by other sessions.
Well, then even an insert statement makes changes to DD objects. Ain't
locks taken then?

DDL Starts by commiting.
Why not declare a savepoint, and later, rollback to that savepoint?

And theres another DBA friend, who speculates that the reason could be that
DDL statements always take an exclusive lock on the underlying object. If
that transaction is not ended implicitly, the locks would be waiting
forever until the user intervenes. This could have serious consequences on
the database, with a potential for deadlocks. Ahem. This by far, seems to
be the most convincing answer to me.

Ok. Maybe, thats just the way its coded. The point I have understood from
this thread, is that a commit is performed to protect the data dictionary.
And DML statements are not truly atomic, for while it maybe possible for an
DML statement to roll back, there are some changes that are indeed
committed.

Thanks
Raj






Deshpande, 
Kirti 

kirti.deshpande@veTo: Multiple 
recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rizon.com cc: 

Sent by:   Subject: RE: simple 
question on DDL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 





January 22, 
2003 

10:33 
PM 

Please respond 
to 

ORACLE-L 









Dan addressed this very well in his earlier post...

Here is what Tom Kyte says in his book (Expert one-on-one Oracle):
DDL locks are automatically placed against objects during a DDL operation
to protect them from changes by other sessions.
DDL locks are held for the duration of the DDL statement, and are released
immediately afterwards. This is done, in effect, by always wrapping DDL
statements in implicit commits (or commit/rollback pair). It is for this
reason that DDL always commits in Oracle..
So, DDL will always commit, even if it is unsuccessful. DDL starts by
committing - be aware of this. It commits first so that if it has to
rollback, it will not roll back your transaction. If you execute DDL, it'll
make permanent any outstanding work you have performed, even if the DDL is
not successful..


Refer to page 119...

- Kirti

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Dan,

If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary tables

have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the
transaction.

For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1

step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
step 2: create table t2
step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
step 4: rollback

At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl create
table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction
should
have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The DDL
broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there. The data

dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that
commit
could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same
transaction the user issued.

The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a commit.

This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to its
seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?

Arup


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Hemant K Chitale
My web site page is :  http://hkchital.tripod.com


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Hemant K

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Jeremy Pulcifer
Title: RE: simple question on DDL





 From: Gogala, Mladen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:45 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
 
 
 Actually, DB2 (pardon my French) doesn't issue a commit 
 after a DDL. I'm not aware of any standards specifying 
 the presence or absence of a commit after a DDL. I know
 that, for instance, EXPLAIN PLAN can be rolled back.
 


Huh?


Explain plan is DDL?





RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Gogala, Mladen
Actually, DB2 (pardon my French) doesn't issue a commit 
after a DDL. I'm not aware of any standards specifying 
the presence or absence of a commit after a DDL. I know
that, for instance, EXPLAIN PLAN can be rolled back.

 -Original Message-
 From: Fink, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:05 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
 
 
 Arup,
   I see your point and agree that the DDL should be an 
 autonomous tx.
 Perhaps an enhancement request is in order? Since Oracle has 
 the autonomous
 tx code, integrating into the kernel should be 
 considered...perhaps for
 Oracle 38i?
   In the absence of that change, I must disagree and say 
 that ddl must
 issue a commit. If you look at a combination of your example 
 and mine, the
 problem of waiting transactions still exists. In order to 
 create a table,
 space must be allocated. Again, if fet$ contains only 1 row for the
 particular file where the table is to be created, there is a 
 potential for a
 serious locking problem. 
 
 Dan
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:14 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 Dan,
 
 If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data 
 dictionary tables 
 have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the 
 transaction.
 
 For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1
 
 step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
 step 2: create table t2
 step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
 step 4: rollback
 
 At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since 
 the ddl create 
 table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my 
 transaction should
 
 have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 
 through 4. The DDL 
 broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from 
 there. The data 
 dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; 
 but that commit
 
 could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same 
 transaction the user issued.
 
 The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should 
 insert a commit. 
 This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a 
 commit to its 
 seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?
 
 Arup
 
 From: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by 
 mc1-f3.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft 
 SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan
 
 2003 15:13:04 -0800
 Received: from fatcity.UUCP (uucp@localhost)by newsfeed.cts.com 
 (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id PAA16552;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 
 15:11:42 -0800 (PST)
 Received: by fatcity.com (26-Feb-2001/v1.0g-b72/bab) via 
 UUCP id 00537F3B; 
 Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
 X-Sender: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
 X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 72; ListGuru (c) 1996-2001 Bruce 
 A. Bergman
 Precedence: bulk
 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 23:13:04.0174 (UTC) 
 FILETIME=[D0E4CCE0:01C2C26B]
 
 Don't forget that extent allocation also affects the extent 
 map for the
 segment and possibly the high water mark. The hwm can be set without
 allocating another extent and allocation of an extent may 
 not alter the hwm
 (if you manually allocate an extent). If I deallocate space 
 from an object,
 I will alter the  rows in fet$ and uet$ but not update the 
 hwm. Make sense?
 
 As for the ATOMICITY of the transaction, this is usually 
 used to describe
 the changes to data of interest. I don't think it is used to 
 describe any
 underlying data dictionary changes. Thus the answer is Yes 
 (for 99% of the
 Oracle techies) and No (for the 1% of us who really like to 
 know exactly
 what is going on under the covers).
 
 Thanks for a great question, it brought up a subject that I had never
 thought about. Yee-Haw! I learned someting today!
 
 Cheers,
 Dan
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:04 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 
 Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes 
 to the data
 dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to 
 me. Maybe,
 thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high 
 water mark. Coz
 changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was 
 rolled back.
 
 I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the 
 same question,
 and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC as
 possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, 
 does that mean
 the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For 
 on a rollback,
 changes

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: simple question on DDL



Set autotrace on ... and then do explain plan for 


You'll see.

Raj
__
Rajendra 
Jamadagni 
 MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot 
com
Any opinion expressed here is 
personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc. 
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but 
having an opinion is an art!

  -Original Message-From: Jeremy Pulcifer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 
  12:09 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  RE: simple question on DDL
   From: Gogala, Mladen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:45 AM  To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L  Subject: RE: simple question on DDL  
Actually, DB2 
  (pardon my French) doesn't issue a commit  after a 
  DDL. I'm not aware of any standards specifying  
  the presence or absence of a "commit" after a DDL. I know  that, for instance, "EXPLAIN PLAN" can be rolled back. 
   
  Huh? 
  Explain plan is DDL? 
This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*2



Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-23 Thread Jonathan Lewis

One question to ask is whether whether all DDL
use the same strategy. Similarly, if you have
multiple code paths for do a ddl call how much
more risk of error do you introduce to the kernel.
Finally how do you get a consistent error response
to the end user if the error condition of apparently
identical events can fail in extremely different ways.

Consider the complexities of finding a consistent
kernel level approach to:

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t1;
-- how to deal with self-deadlock ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;

insert into t1 values (1);
drop table t2;
-- how to deal with lock by other user ?
insert into t1 values (2);
commit;



Regards

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Coming soon a new one-day tutorial:
Cost Based Optimisation
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )

Next Seminar dates:
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )

England__January 21/23
USA_(CA, TX)_August


The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html





-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 January 2003 16:31


Arup,
 I see your point and agree that the DDL should be an autonomous tx.
Perhaps an enhancement request is in order? Since Oracle has the
autonomous
tx code, integrating into the kernel should be considered...perhaps
for
Oracle 38i?
 In the absence of that change, I must disagree and say that ddl must
issue a commit. If you look at a combination of your example and
mine, the
problem of waiting transactions still exists. In order to create a
table,
space must be allocated. Again, if fet$ contains only 1 row for the
particular file where the table is to be created, there is a
potential for a
serious locking problem.

Dan


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jonathan Lewis
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Markus Reger
hi
what's your exact question?
you mean autocommit like in database applications?
what tool are you using to observe or redard to this phenomenon?

the erd-demon has to send some info via rs232 to make the amplifier -called booster - 
work. no info implies no current on the tracks. kind of answwer you want?

kr mr



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/22/03 13:03 PM 
Hi friends

Why DDL statements performs auto commit ? What is the exact reason behind
that one?
Anyone can share his/her opinions!!

Thanks  regards
BanarasiBabu
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: BanarasiBabu Tippa
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Markus Reger
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Arup Nanda
My guess will be to preserve the changes to the data dictionary, which are
just Oracle tables anyway. When you create a table, a record goes to TAB$,
SEG$ and so on and so forth. Unless there is a commit these information is
not visible.

But now that you asked, I wnder why the same objective couldn't have been
done through autonomous transactions.

Arup

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:33 AM


 Hi friends

 Why DDL statements performs auto commit ? What is the exact reason behind
 that one?
 Anyone can share his/her opinions!!

 Thanks  regards
 BanarasiBabu
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author: BanarasiBabu Tippa
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Arup Nanda
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Rajesh . Rao

That raises another doubt. For an simple insert statement, could also
update the UET$ or FET$ tables? So, if the purpose was to preserve all
changes to the data dictionary, What's different between OBJ$, COL$ and
these space management tables?

Thanks
Raj




   
 
Arup Nanda   
 
arupnanda@hoTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tmail.com   cc:   
 
Sent by: Subject: Re: simple question on DDL   
 
root@fatcity.  
 
com
 
   
 
   
 
January 22,
 
2003 09:58 AM  
 
Please 
 
respond to 
 
ORACLE-L   
 
   
 
   
 




My guess will be to preserve the changes to the data dictionary, which are
just Oracle tables anyway. When you create a table, a record goes to TAB$,
SEG$ and so on and so forth. Unless there is a commit these information is
not visible.

But now that you asked, I wnder why the same objective couldn't have been
done through autonomous transactions.

Arup

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:33 AM


 Hi friends

 Why DDL statements performs auto commit ? What is the exact reason behind
 that one?
 Anyone can share his/her opinions!!

 Thanks  regards
 BanarasiBabu
 --


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Freeman Robert - IL
Consistency is the key too imagine what would happen if I dropped a
column or changed it's definition, while a SQL statement or PL/SQL package
was executing. The data that was updated before the change may well be very
different in nature than the data after the change

Borrowing from Ghostbusters if I may:

Dr. DBA: This database is about to face a disaster of biblical proportions. 
Hapless Manager: What do you mean, biblical? 
Sr. DBA Lead: We mean real wrath-of-God type stuff. Plagues, darkness-- 
Another DBA: The dead rising from the grave! 
Sr. DBA: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes-- 
Dr. DBA: Riots in the streets, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria
Manager: So, it's Ok to cut the DBA budget then?

RF

Robert G. Freeman 
Technical Management Consultant
TUSC - The Oracle Experts www.tusc.com
904.708.5076 Cell (it's everywhere that I am!)
Author of several books you can find on Amazon.com!



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Well look at it this way, besides creating/modifying/dropping the object
that you want your also performing a number of updated/inserts/deletes from
the
data dictionary.  Those data dictionary tables are just that, tables.  Now
imagine what a mess would be created if you performed a DDL statement and
then
rolled back the data dictionary updates?  These MUST be completed as a
single
autonomous transaction, so Oracle does you a favor and performs an implicit
commit.  Same thing with any other DBMS I've been associated with.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: BanarasiBabu Tippa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   1/22/2003 3:33 AM

Hi friends

Why DDL statements performs auto commit ? What is the exact reason behind
that one?
Anyone can share his/her opinions!!

Thanks  regards
BanarasiBabu
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: BanarasiBabu Tippa
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Freeman Robert - IL
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Arup Nanda
Very good point, Raj. I didn't wonder just for the sake it; there was meat
to it ;)

Now that this has been raised, any ideas, anybody?

- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:01 PM



 That raises another doubt. For an simple insert statement, could also
 update the UET$ or FET$ tables? So, if the purpose was to preserve all
 changes to the data dictionary, What's different between OBJ$, COL$ and
 these space management tables?

 Thanks
 Raj





 Arup Nanda
 arupnanda@hoTo: Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 tmail.com   cc:
 Sent by: Subject: Re: simple question
on DDL
 root@fatcity.
 com


 January 22,
 2003 09:58 AM
 Please
 respond to
 ORACLE-L






 My guess will be to preserve the changes to the data dictionary, which are
 just Oracle tables anyway. When you create a table, a record goes to TAB$,
 SEG$ and so on and so forth. Unless there is a commit these information is
 not visible.

 But now that you asked, I wnder why the same objective couldn't have been
 done through autonomous transactions.

 Arup

 - Original Message -
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:33 AM


  Hi friends
 
  Why DDL statements performs auto commit ? What is the exact reason
behind
  that one?
  Anyone can share his/her opinions!!
 
  Thanks  regards
  BanarasiBabu
  --


 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author:
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Arup Nanda
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Fink, Dan
Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation is
required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional extents
(updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in the data
dictionary). These updates to the data dictionary are implicitly committed,
even if you issue an explicit rollback for the insert statement. Imagine if
the dd changes are not immediately committed. Let's say another tx (we'll
call tx2) needs to allocate an extent in the same datafile.  If fet$
contains only a single row for the file requested, then tx1 will have an
exclusive lock on the row. tx2 needs to also lock the row exclusively in
order to update it. Thus, tx2 would wait until tx1 has completed and
released the lock. In the meantime, any transaction that needs to allocate a
new extent in that file will have to wait...and wait...and wait. 

A different strategy is to commit the changes to fet$ and uet$ immediately.
Then the next tx can access the row and grab space. While this could result
in an overallocation of space if the tx is rolled back, it does not block
other txs. If space was allocated to an object, and the tx failed, there is
a strong probability that this space will be used at some point in the
future. 

It seems that the tradeoff here is that the access to the data dictionary is
kept to a minimum duration at the expense of periodic space wastage
(initially).

As for the other data dictionary tables, it may be a case of read
consistency conflicts. If a long running transaction needs to access a table
definition, but a previous transaction has updated the table definition, but
not committed, which table definition do you use? There are some issues with
definitions not being the same at the start of a transaction and at a later
point. As I recall, Oracle terminates the transaction if object definitions
change while the transaction is running. 

All in all, it makes sense (at least to me) that changes to the data
dictionary are immediately committed. Otherwise, the performance and
integrity of the system would be comprimised.

Dan Fink

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



That raises another doubt. For an simple insert statement, could also
update the UET$ or FET$ tables? So, if the purpose was to preserve all
changes to the data dictionary, What's different between OBJ$, COL$ and
these space management tables?

Thanks
Raj
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Fink, Dan
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




Re: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Igor Neyman
Very good case described.

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:16 PM


 Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation is
 required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional extents
 (updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in the
data
 dictionary). These updates to the data dictionary are implicitly
committed,
 even if you issue an explicit rollback for the insert statement. Imagine
if
 the dd changes are not immediately committed. Let's say another tx (we'll
 call tx2) needs to allocate an extent in the same datafile.  If fet$
 contains only a single row for the file requested, then tx1 will have an
 exclusive lock on the row. tx2 needs to also lock the row exclusively in
 order to update it. Thus, tx2 would wait until tx1 has completed and
 released the lock. In the meantime, any transaction that needs to allocate
a
 new extent in that file will have to wait...and wait...and wait.

 A different strategy is to commit the changes to fet$ and uet$
immediately.
 Then the next tx can access the row and grab space. While this could
result
 in an overallocation of space if the tx is rolled back, it does not block
 other txs. If space was allocated to an object, and the tx failed, there
is
 a strong probability that this space will be used at some point in the
 future.

 It seems that the tradeoff here is that the access to the data dictionary
is
 kept to a minimum duration at the expense of periodic space wastage
 (initially).

 As for the other data dictionary tables, it may be a case of read
 consistency conflicts. If a long running transaction needs to access a
table
 definition, but a previous transaction has updated the table definition,
but
 not committed, which table definition do you use? There are some issues
with
 definitions not being the same at the start of a transaction and at a
later
 point. As I recall, Oracle terminates the transaction if object
definitions
 change while the transaction is running.

 All in all, it makes sense (at least to me) that changes to the data
 dictionary are immediately committed. Otherwise, the performance and
 integrity of the system would be comprimised.

 Dan Fink

 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:01 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



 That raises another doubt. For an simple insert statement, could also
 update the UET$ or FET$ tables? So, if the purpose was to preserve all
 changes to the data dictionary, What's different between OBJ$, COL$ and
 these space management tables?

 Thanks
 Raj
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
 --
 Author: Fink, Dan
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Rajesh . Rao

Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes to the data
dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to me. Maybe,
thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high water mark. Coz
changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was rolled back.

I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the same question,
and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC as
possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, does that mean
the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a rollback,
changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is rolled
back.

Thanks
Raj




   
 
Fink, Dan
 
Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.comcc:   
 
Sent by: Subject: RE: simple question on DDL   
 
root@fatcity.  
 
com
 
   
 
   
 
January 22,
 
2003 02:16 PM  
 
Please 
 
respond to 
 
ORACLE-L   
 
   
 
   
 




Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation is
required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional extents
(updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in the data
dictionary). These updates to the data dictionary are implicitly committed,
even if you issue an explicit rollback for the insert statement. Imagine if
the dd changes are not immediately committed. Let's say another tx (we'll
call tx2) needs to allocate an extent in the same datafile.  If fet$
contains only a single row for the file requested, then tx1 will have an
exclusive lock on the row. tx2 needs to also lock the row exclusively in
order to update it. Thus, tx2 would wait until tx1 has completed and
released the lock. In the meantime, any transaction that needs to allocate
a
new extent in that file will have to wait...and wait...and wait.

A different strategy is to commit the changes to fet$ and uet$ immediately.
Then the next tx can access the row and grab space. While this could result
in an overallocation of space if the tx is rolled back, it does not block
other txs. If space was allocated to an object, and the tx failed, there is
a strong probability that this space will be used at some point in the
future.

It seems that the tradeoff here is that the access to the data dictionary
is
kept to a minimum duration at the expense of periodic space wastage
(initially).

As for the other data dictionary tables, it may be a case of read
consistency conflicts. If a long running transaction needs to access a
table
definition, but a previous transaction has updated the table definition,
but
not committed, which table definition do you use? There are some issues
with
definitions not being the same at the start of a transaction and at a later
point. As I recall, Oracle terminates the transaction if object definitions
change while the transaction is running.

All in all, it makes sense (at least to me) that changes to the data
dictionary are immediately committed. Otherwise, the performance and
integrity of the system would be comprimised.

Dan Fink

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



That raises another doubt. For an simple insert statement, could also
update the UET$ or FET$ tables? So, if the purpose was to preserve all
changes to the data dictionary, What's different between OBJ$, COL

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Fink, Dan
Don't forget that extent allocation also affects the extent map for the
segment and possibly the high water mark. The hwm can be set without
allocating another extent and allocation of an extent may not alter the hwm
(if you manually allocate an extent). If I deallocate space from an object,
I will alter the  rows in fet$ and uet$ but not update the hwm. Make sense?

As for the ATOMICITY of the transaction, this is usually used to describe
the changes to data of interest. I don't think it is used to describe any
underlying data dictionary changes. Thus the answer is Yes (for 99% of the
Oracle techies) and No (for the 1% of us who really like to know exactly
what is going on under the covers).

Thanks for a great question, it brought up a subject that I had never
thought about. Yee-Haw! I learned someting today!

Cheers,
Dan 

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes to the data
dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to me. Maybe,
thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high water mark. Coz
changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was rolled back.

I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the same question,
and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC as
possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, does that mean
the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a rollback,
changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is rolled
back.

Thanks
Raj




 

Fink, Dan

Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.comcc:

Sent by: Subject: RE: simple question on
DDL
root@fatcity.

com

 

 

January 22,

2003 02:16 PM

Please

respond to

ORACLE-L

 

 





Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation is
required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional extents
(updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in the data
dictionary). These updates to the data dictionary are implicitly committed,
even if you issue an explicit rollback for the insert statement. Imagine if
the dd changes are not immediately committed. Let's say another tx (we'll
call tx2) needs to allocate an extent in the same datafile.  If fet$
contains only a single row for the file requested, then tx1 will have an
exclusive lock on the row. tx2 needs to also lock the row exclusively in
order to update it. Thus, tx2 would wait until tx1 has completed and
released the lock. In the meantime, any transaction that needs to allocate
a
new extent in that file will have to wait...and wait...and wait.

A different strategy is to commit the changes to fet$ and uet$ immediately.
Then the next tx can access the row and grab space. While this could result
in an overallocation of space if the tx is rolled back, it does not block
other txs. If space was allocated to an object, and the tx failed, there is
a strong probability that this space will be used at some point in the
future.

It seems that the tradeoff here is that the access to the data dictionary
is
kept to a minimum duration at the expense of periodic space wastage
(initially).

As for the other data dictionary tables, it may be a case of read
consistency conflicts. If a long running transaction needs to access a
table
definition, but a previous transaction has updated the table definition,
but
not committed, which table definition do you use? There are some issues
with
definitions not being the same at the start of a transaction and at a later
point. As I recall, Oracle terminates the transaction if object definitions
change while the transaction is running.

All in all, it makes sense (at least to me) that changes to the data
dictionary are immediately committed. Otherwise, the performance and
integrity of the system would be comprimised.

Dan Fink

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



That raises another doubt. For an simple insert statement, could also
update the UET$ or FET$ tables? So, if the purpose was to preserve all
changes to the data dictionary, What's different between OBJ$, COL$ and
these space management tables?

Thanks
Raj


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Arup Nanda
Dan,

If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary tables 
have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the 
transaction.

For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1

step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
step 2: create table t2
step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
step 4: rollback

At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl create 
table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction should 
have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The DDL 
broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there. The data 
dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that commit 
could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same 
transaction the user issued.

The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a commit. 
This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to its 
seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?

Arup

From: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: simple question on DDL
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by 
mc1-f3.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 
2003 15:13:04 -0800
Received: from fatcity.UUCP (uucp@localhost)by newsfeed.cts.com 
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id PAA16552;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:11:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fatcity.com (26-Feb-2001/v1.0g-b72/bab) via UUCP id 00537F3B; 
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:18:57 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Comment: Oracle RDBMS Community Forum
X-Sender: Fink, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California
X-ListServer: v1.0g, build 72; ListGuru (c) 1996-2001 Bruce A. Bergman
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 23:13:04.0174 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[D0E4CCE0:01C2C26B]

Don't forget that extent allocation also affects the extent map for the
segment and possibly the high water mark. The hwm can be set without
allocating another extent and allocation of an extent may not alter the hwm
(if you manually allocate an extent). If I deallocate space from an object,
I will alter the  rows in fet$ and uet$ but not update the hwm. Make sense?

As for the ATOMICITY of the transaction, this is usually used to describe
the changes to data of interest. I don't think it is used to describe any
underlying data dictionary changes. Thus the answer is Yes (for 99% of the
Oracle techies) and No (for the 1% of us who really like to know exactly
what is going on under the covers).

Thanks for a great question, it brought up a subject that I had never
thought about. Yee-Haw! I learned someting today!

Cheers,
Dan

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Thanks Dan. The gist of your response was that all changes to the data
dictionary are immediately commited. Seems to make sense to me. Maybe,
thats one reason why one cannot free space below the high water mark. Coz
changes to UET$ has been committed, even though the data was rolled back.

I sent an email to one of my senior DBA friends, posing the same question,
and he replied with a one liner To make the transaction as ATOMIC as
possible - They either run completely, or not at all.  Now, does that mean
the Insert, update and delete statements are not ATOMIC? For on a rollback,
changes to the data dictionary are commited, whereas the data is rolled
back.

Thanks
Raj






Fink, Dan

Dan.Fink@mdxTo: Multiple recipients of 
list
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.comcc:

Sent by: Subject: RE: simple question 
on
DDL
root@fatcity.

com





January 22,

2003 02:16 PM

Please

respond to

ORACLE-L









Take the case of an insert (we'll call tx1), where space allocation is
required. As you insert records, the table allocated additional extents
(updating fet$ (free extent table) and uet$ (used extent table) in the data
dictionary). These updates to the data dictionary are implicitly committed,
even if you issue an explicit rollback for the insert statement. Imagine if
the dd changes are not immediately committed. Let's say another tx (we'll
call tx2) needs to allocate an extent in the same datafile.  If fet$
contains only a single row for the file requested, then tx1 will have an
exclusive lock on the row. tx2 needs to also lock the row exclusively in
order to update it. Thus, tx2 would wait until tx1 has completed and
released the lock. In the meantime, any

RE: simple question on DDL

2003-01-22 Thread Deshpande, Kirti
Dan addressed this very well in his earlier post... 

Here is what Tom Kyte says in his book (Expert one-on-one Oracle): 
DDL locks are automatically placed against objects during a DDL operation to protect 
them from changes by other sessions.
DDL locks are held for the duration of the DDL statement, and are released 
immediately afterwards. This is done, in effect, by always wrapping DDL statements in 
implicit commits (or commit/rollback pair). It is for this reason that DDL always 
commits in Oracle.. 
So, DDL will always commit, even if it is unsuccessful. DDL starts by committing - be 
aware of this. It commits first so that if it has to rollback, it will not roll back 
your transaction. If you execute DDL, it'll make permanent any outstanding work you 
have performed, even if the DDL is not successful.. 


Refer to page 119... 

- Kirti 

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Dan,

If I may, essentially you are saying that changes to data dictionary tables 
have to be committed immediately regardless of the outcome of the 
transaction.

For instance in the following code, starting with an empty table t1

step 1: insert into table t1 values row1
step 2: create table t2
step 3: insert into table t1 values row2
step 4: rollback

At this point a select * from t1 will show only row1, since the ddl create 
table t2 has inserted a commit. However, the point is, my transaction should 
have been from step 1 through step 4, not fromn step 3 through 4. The DDL 
broke my txn at step 2 and another transaction started from there. The data 
dictionary tables were updated and they should be committed; but that commit 
could have been done via an autonomous transaction, not in the same 
transaction the user issued.

The more I think about it, I see no point why a DDL should insert a commit. 
This is different from saying that DDL itself may issue a commit to its 
seprate transaction to update the catalog. Any thoughts on that?

Arup


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Deshpande, Kirti
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




Re: simple ? question

2002-10-25 Thread Joan Hsieh
Stephane, 
you are right, after I talked to the developer. She is totally confused
by alias name, dbname, schema name. She is referring database name. 

joan

Joan Hsieh wrote:
 
 Stephane,
 
 Well spoken- my bad. Our developer threw me this question when  I was
 just leaving from work. (I copied her email to the list) Now I am at
 home and taking a chance to look it over again. I am not sure what she
 asked for. My guess is she wants to pass a variable based on  @xxx to
 access the schema. I will make it clear tomorrow. I have been very busy
 lately and we have too many projects going on at once. Please bear with
 me if I didn't put my effort into it.
 
 Many thanks,
 Joan
 
 Stephane Faroult wrote:
 
  Joan Hsieh wrote:
  
   Hi Listers,
  
   I am trying to find a way to know the schema name. Say, if I logged in
   as jjin01@ngd.  When I run a program, how can I get the schema name
   which should be ngd? If I logged in as bkrasnof@pr, in this case, the
   schema name will be pr.
  
   Thanks in advance,
  
   Joan
 
  Joan,
 
Beware of vocabulary: what is usually called the 'schema name' is the
  name of the Oracle account which owns the tables.
 
 select global_name from global_name;
 
  will return the name of the database. But beware that the name of the
  database has no link to your @ngd which is just your tns alias (locally
  defined very often). Most people give as tns alias the name of the SID
  which is in turn the name of the database, but this is just a common
  sense rule - nothing mandatory here. It's usually pretty clean on Unix,
  but under NT a lot of databases have 'ORCL' has their SID, are of course
  referred to under different names in TNSNAMES.ora and _may_ not have a
  significant global name (can be changed with 'alter database').
 
  Great opportunity to set up company standards.
 
  --
  Regards,
 
  Stephane Faroult
  Oriole Software
  --
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  --
  Author: Stephane Faroult
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
  San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
  -
  To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
  to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
  the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
  (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
  also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Joan Hsieh
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Joan Hsieh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple ? question

2002-10-24 Thread Stephane Faroult
Joan Hsieh wrote:
 
 Hi Listers,
 
 I am trying to find a way to know the schema name. Say, if I logged in
 as jjin01@ngd.  When I run a program, how can I get the schema name
 which should be ngd? If I logged in as bkrasnof@pr, in this case, the
 schema name will be pr.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Joan

Joan,

  Beware of vocabulary: what is usually called the 'schema name' is the
name of the Oracle account which owns the tables.

   select global_name from global_name;

will return the name of the database. But beware that the name of the
database has no link to your @ngd which is just your tns alias (locally
defined very often). Most people give as tns alias the name of the SID
which is in turn the name of the database, but this is just a common
sense rule - nothing mandatory here. It's usually pretty clean on Unix,
but under NT a lot of databases have 'ORCL' has their SID, are of course
referred to under different names in TNSNAMES.ora and _may_ not have a
significant global name (can be changed with 'alter database').

Great opportunity to set up company standards.

-- 
Regards,

Stephane Faroult
Oriole Software
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple ? question

2002-10-24 Thread Joan Hsieh
Stephane,

Well spoken- my bad.  Our developer threw me this question when I was just 
leaving from work. ( I copied from her email) Now I am at home to look it over. 
I am not clear what she asked for. I think she wants to pass a variable based 
on the @xxx to access this schema. I will make it clear tomorrow. Tomorrow is 
going to be a long day for me. Too many projects going on at once and we have a 
very tight schedule.
Thanks,

Joan
Quoting Stephane Faroult [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Joan Hsieh wrote:
  
  Hi Listers,
  
  I am trying to find a way to know the schema name. Say, if I logged in
  as jjin01@ngd.  When I run a program, how can I get the schema name
  which should be ngd? If I logged in as bkrasnof@pr, in this case, the
  schema name will be pr.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  Joan
 
 Joan,
 
   Beware of vocabulary: what is usually called the 'schema name' is the
 name of the Oracle account which owns the tables.
 
select global_name from global_name;
 
 will return the name of the database. But beware that the name of the
 database has no link to your @ngd which is just your tns alias (locally
 defined very often). Most people give as tns alias the name of the SID
 which is in turn the name of the database, but this is just a common
 sense rule - nothing mandatory here. It's usually pretty clean on Unix,
 but under NT a lot of databases have 'ORCL' has their SID, are of course
 referred to under different names in TNSNAMES.ora and _may_ not have a
 significant global name (can be changed with 'alter database').
 
 Great opportunity to set up company standards.
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 
 Stephane Faroult
 Oriole Software
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: Stephane Faroult
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Joan Hsieh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple ? question

2002-10-24 Thread Joan Hsieh
Stephane,

Well spoken- my bad. Our developer threw me this question when  I was
just leaving from work. (I copied her email to the list) Now I am at
home and taking a chance to look it over again. I am not sure what she
asked for. My guess is she wants to pass a variable based on  @xxx to
access the schema. I will make it clear tomorrow. I have been very busy
lately and we have too many projects going on at once. Please bear with
me if I didn't put my effort into it.

Many thanks,
Joan

Stephane Faroult wrote:
 
 Joan Hsieh wrote:
 
  Hi Listers,
 
  I am trying to find a way to know the schema name. Say, if I logged in
  as jjin01@ngd.  When I run a program, how can I get the schema name
  which should be ngd? If I logged in as bkrasnof@pr, in this case, the
  schema name will be pr.
 
  Thanks in advance,
 
  Joan
 
 Joan,
 
   Beware of vocabulary: what is usually called the 'schema name' is the
 name of the Oracle account which owns the tables.
 
select global_name from global_name;
 
 will return the name of the database. But beware that the name of the
 database has no link to your @ngd which is just your tns alias (locally
 defined very often). Most people give as tns alias the name of the SID
 which is in turn the name of the database, but this is just a common
 sense rule - nothing mandatory here. It's usually pretty clean on Unix,
 but under NT a lot of databases have 'ORCL' has their SID, are of course
 referred to under different names in TNSNAMES.ora and _may_ not have a
 significant global name (can be changed with 'alter database').
 
 Great opportunity to set up company standards.
 
 --
 Regards,
 
 Stephane Faroult
 Oriole Software
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Stephane Faroult
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
 San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
 -
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Joan Hsieh
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Simple question on logging..

2002-08-14 Thread Ramon E. Estevez



ALTER TABLE yourtable NOLOGGING




- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:33 PM




 Hi Gurus,

 How can I turn off logging for a table in Oracle7.3 database. Iam planning
 to reorg thru ctas and want to use append hint for loading data.

 SQL alter table tt unrecoverable;
 alter table tt unrecoverable
*
 ERROR at line 1:
 ORA-01735: invalid ALTER TABLE option


 SQL alter table tt nologging;
 alter table tt nologging
*
 ERROR at line 1:
 ORA-01735: invalid ALTER TABLE option

 TIA
 peter.

 _
 MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
 http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Peter R
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ramon E. Estevez
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Simple question on logging..

2002-08-14 Thread Jacques Kilchoer
Title: RE: Simple question on logging..





 -Original Message-
 From: Peter R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 How can I turn off logging for a table in Oracle7.3 database. 


Recoverable/unrecoverable is not a persistent attribute in 7.3.4 The unrecoverable option only applies to the create table but not to any subsequent operations.

But starting with Oracle 8.0, the nologging option (which replaces the deprecated unrecoverable) on a create table will also apply to subsequent operations like Direct SQL*Loader and direct-load inserts. If you don't specify logging/nologging at table creation time then, as expected, the setting will be taken from the tablespace defaults.




Re: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-02 Thread Yechiel Adar

Dave

I checked this out and it depends on the oracle version.
Editing the listener.log of 8.1.6.3.4 on NT failed as: Another process is
using the file.
The same for 9.0.1.3 on NT. Editing not problem. Marked the whole text
except for
the last day and deleted it and then I saved the file.
Size down to 9k from about 10,000k.

Yechiel Adar
Mehish
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:58 PM


If you are running Oracle on Windoze, you have to stop the listener service,
then rename the listener.log, then start the listener service again.  I
don't know how on Unix.

Dave

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement ===
The information contained in this message and any attachments is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return
e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
= End Confidentiality Statement =


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Farnsworth, Dave
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Yechiel Adar
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Sherman, Paul R.

Hamid,

Move it to alert_log.yymmdd if you need to save it, else remove it. The file
will be auto-created by Oracle the next time it writes to it.

Thank you,

Paul Sherman
DBAElcom, Inc.
voice -  781-501-4143 (direct #)
fax-  781-278-8341 (secure)
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sherman, Paul R.
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Suzy Vordos


For Unix:
cp -p listener.log listener.log.old
echo   listener.log

Or you can disable logging completely using logging_listener=off in
listener.ora


Hamid Alavi wrote:
 
 HI AGAIN,
 
 JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
 RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
 ORACLE.
 HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
 THANKS FOR HELP.
 
 Hamid Alavi
 Office 818 737-0526
 Cell818 402-1987
 
 === Confidentiality Statement ===
 The information contained in this message and any attachments is
 intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
 addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL
 and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received
 this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or
 using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return
 e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
 = End Confidentiality Statement =
 
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Hamid Alavi
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Suzy Vordos
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Scott . Shafer

What OS?  Oracle version?   

Oh yeah, stop SHOUTING.  We can hear you just fine here on the Good Ship
Lollipop.

Scott Shafer
San Antonio, TX
210-581-6217


 -Original Message-
 From: Hamid Alavi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:18 PM
 To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject:  SIMPLE QUESTION
 
 HI AGAIN,
 
 JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
 RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
 ORACLE.
 HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
 THANKS FOR HELP.
 
 Hamid Alavi
 Office 818 737-0526
 Cell818 402-1987
 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Sherman, Paul R.

Hamid,

Ignore my e-mail, as I had alert_log in the brain, not listener. As for the
listener, for most versions, you would have to stop the listener, remove it,
then restart it.

Thank you,

Paul Sherman
DBAElcom, Inc.
voice -  781-501-4143 (direct #)
fax-  781-278-8341 (secure)
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sherman, Paul R.
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Mandal, Ashoke


cat /dev/null  listener.log.

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Mandal, Ashoke
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Farnsworth, Dave

If you are running Oracle on Windoze, you have to stop the listener service, then 
rename the listener.log, then start the listener service again.  I don't know how on 
Unix.

Dave

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Farnsworth, Dave
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Jesse, Rich

Actually, like most everything else, it depends on platform and version.
OpenVMS, for example, will not recreate the file.  In this case, you must:

1)  lsnrctl set log_file temp_name
2)  rename $ORACLE_HOME/network/log/listener.log to something else.
3)  lsnrctl set log_file listener   (no .log!)

This should work for Oracle 8.x.  Not sure about other versions.

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

Disclaimer: I'm an idiot, but the difference between me and other idiots is
that I know I'm an idiot.

 -Original Message-
 From: Sherman, Paul R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:49 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: RE: SIMPLE QUESTION
 
 
 Hamid,
 
 Move it to alert_log.yymmdd if you need to save it, else 
 remove it. The file
 will be auto-created by Oracle the next time it writes to it.
 
 Thank you,
 
 Paul Sherman
 DBAElcom, Inc.
 voice -  781-501-4143 (direct #)
 fax-  781-278-8341 (secure)
 email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 
 
 HI AGAIN,
 
 JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING 
 BIG I TRY TO
 RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD 
 ONE IS USING BY
 ORACLE.
 HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY 
 DELETE IT OR NOT?
 THANKS FOR HELP.
 
 
 
 
 Hamid Alavi
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Igor Neyman

You'll have to stop listener in order to remove listener.log (otherwise, the
file is locked).
If you are not interested in the info, which is in listener.log, you can
just specify LOGGING_LISTENER=OFF in your listener configuration file.

Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:48 PM


 Hamid,

 Move it to alert_log.yymmdd if you need to save it, else remove it. The
file
 will be auto-created by Oracle the next time it writes to it.

 Thank you,

 Paul Sherman
 DBAElcom, Inc.
 voice -  781-501-4143 (direct #)
 fax-  781-278-8341 (secure)
 email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


 HI AGAIN,

 JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
 RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
 ORACLE.
 HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
 THANKS FOR HELP.




 Hamid Alavi
 Office 818 737-0526
 Cell818 402-1987






 === Confidentiality Statement ===
 The information contained in this message and any attachments is
 intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
 addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL
 and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received
 this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or
 using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return
 e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
 = End Confidentiality Statement =


 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Hamid Alavi
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Sherman, Paul R.
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Igor Neyman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread basher 59

stop the listener, then rename or delete it.  (It won't matter.)  Then 
restart the listener and you will have a new log.


From: Hamid Alavi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SIMPLE QUESTION
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 09:18:23 -0800

HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement ===
The information contained in this message and any attachments is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return
e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
= End Confidentiality Statement =


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hamid Alavi
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: basher 59
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F

Hamid,

the following command:

lsnrctl set log_status off

will stop logging connections to the listener.log file.

the following command:

lsnrctl set log_file listener1.log

will create a new file called listener1.log.  you could then delete the
original listener.log file (I have YET to find a reason for keeping this
file around), and issue another :

lsnrctl set log_file listener.log

to reset the logging back to the original file name.

I have started using option #1 above to turn this stupid logging off.

hope this helps

Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mercadante, Thomas F
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Seefelt, Beth


Switch the logfile location to another directory using 'lsnrctl set
log_directory', rename the old log, switch the destination back.



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY
TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING
BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR
NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement
=== 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or

using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement
=  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Seefelt, Beth
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Feng, Jun

Here is what we did.

1.  Disable VCS;
2.  lsnrctl set current_listener LISTENERedb;
3.  lsnrctl set log_status off;
4.  rename listeneredb.log to listeneredb.log.old;
5.  lsnrctl set log_status on.


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Feng, Jun
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Ruth Gramolini

You have to have the listener down to rename or delete it.  Just shut the
listener down for a second, rename the file or delete it, and restart the
listener.

HTH,
Ruth
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM


 HI AGAIN,

 JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
 RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
 ORACLE.
 HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
 THANKS FOR HELP.




 Hamid Alavi
 Office 818 737-0526
 Cell818 402-1987






 === Confidentiality Statement ===
 The information contained in this message and any attachments is
 intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
 addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL
 and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received
 this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or
 using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return
 e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
 = End Confidentiality Statement =


 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Hamid Alavi
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ruth Gramolini
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION (truncating listener.log)

2002-05-01 Thread Hately Mike

Hi,
You can truncate the listener.log without stopping the listener by doing
this:

cat /dev/null  listener.log 

It won't interrupt the flow of information into the file because it
maintains the same inode value.

Regards,
Mike Hately

PS notice how truncating listener.log is more meaningful than SIMPLE
QUESTION.  =)



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:54 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hamid,

Ignore my e-mail, as I had alert_log in the brain, not listener. As for the
listener, for most versions, you would have to stop the listener, remove it,
then restart it.

Thank you,

Paul Sherman
DBAElcom, Inc.
voice -  781-501-4143 (direct #)
fax-  781-278-8341 (secure)
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987





 

 

This email and any attached to it are confidential and intended only for the
individual or 
entity to which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please let us know 
by telephoning or emailing the sender.  You should also delete the email and
any attachment 
from your systems and should not copy the email or any attachment or
disclose their content 
to any other person or entity.  The views expressed here are not necessarily
those of 
Churchill Insurance Group plc or its affiliates or subsidiaries. Thank you. 
Churchill Insurance Group plc.  Company Registration Number - 2280426.
England. 
Registered Office: Churchill Court, Westmoreland Road, Bromley, Kent BR1
1DP. 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hately Mike
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Adams, Matthew (GEA, MABG, 088130)
Title: RE: SIMPLE QUESTION





Actually it can be done without restarting the listener


lsnrctl set log_file new_log_file_name
[re]move the old log file
lsnrctl set log_file old_log_file_name





Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reason is 6/7ths of treason. - The Xtals


-Original Message-
From: Sherman, Paul R. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: SIMPLE QUESTION



Hamid,


Ignore my e-mail, as I had alert_log in the brain, not listener. As for the
listener, for most versions, you would have to stop the listener, remove it,
then restart it.


Thank you,


Paul Sherman
DBA Elcom, Inc.
voice - 781-501-4143 (direct #)
fax - 781-278-8341 (secure)
email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



HI AGAIN,


JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.





Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell 818 402-1987







=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information. Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement = 



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sherman, Paul R.
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).





Re: SIMPLE QUESTION (truncating listener.log)

2002-05-01 Thread Ruth Gramolini

Oops! I forgot about that..RBG
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:28 PM


 Hi,
 You can truncate the listener.log without stopping the listener by doing
 this:

 cat /dev/null  listener.log

 It won't interrupt the flow of information into the file because it
 maintains the same inode value.

 Regards,
 Mike Hately

 PS notice how truncating listener.log is more meaningful than SIMPLE
 QUESTION.  =)



 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:54 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


 Hamid,

 Ignore my e-mail, as I had alert_log in the brain, not listener. As for
the
 listener, for most versions, you would have to stop the listener, remove
it,
 then restart it.

 Thank you,

 Paul Sherman
 DBAElcom, Inc.
 voice -  781-501-4143 (direct #)
 fax-  781-278-8341 (secure)
 email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


 HI AGAIN,

 JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
 RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
 ORACLE.
 HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
 THANKS FOR HELP.




 Hamid Alavi
 Office 818 737-0526
 Cell818 402-1987








 

 This email and any attached to it are confidential and intended only for
the
 individual or
 entity to which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient,
 please let us know
 by telephoning or emailing the sender.  You should also delete the email
and
 any attachment
 from your systems and should not copy the email or any attachment or
 disclose their content
 to any other person or entity.  The views expressed here are not
necessarily
 those of
 Churchill Insurance Group plc or its affiliates or subsidiaries. Thank
you.
 Churchill Insurance Group plc.  Company Registration Number - 2280426.
 England.
 Registered Office: Churchill Court, Westmoreland Road, Bromley, Kent BR1
 1DP.


 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: Hately Mike
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ruth Gramolini
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Sutton, Reed

Hamid,

Stop the listener, delete the file, then restart it.

lsnrctl stop
delete the log or rename it
lsnrctl start

It will take less than a minute.  If this isn't a very important server you
can do it quickly during the day - but use your judgment on that, don't want
to get you fired.

HTH
Reed

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE. HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT
OR NOT? THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the
message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of
mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may also send the HELP
command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sutton, Reed
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: SIMPLE QUESTION - old answer

2002-05-01 Thread Brian_P_MacLean


See my old posting at
http://faqchest.dynhost.com/prgm/oracle-l/ora-01/ora-0105/ora-010521/ora01052411_15995.html


Brian P. MacLean
Oracle DBA, OCP8i



   
 
Hamid Alavi
 
hamid.alavi@qu   To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
ovadx.comcc:  
 
Sent by:  Subject: SIMPLE QUESTION 
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
m  
 
   
 
   
 
05/01/02 10:18 
 
AM 
 
Please respond 
 
to ORACLE-L
 
   
 
   
 




HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement ===
The information contained in this message and any attachments is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return
e-mail and delete the original message from your system.
= End Confidentiality Statement =


--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: SIMPLE QUESTION

2002-05-01 Thread Wong, Bing


If this is unix, do this...

1. backup the log if you need it
2. issue this command   listener.log  (this will initialize the log)



-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


HI AGAIN,

JUST WANT TO CHECK WITH YOU GUYS, MY LISTENER.LOG IS GETTING BIG I TRY TO
RENAME IT THEN CREATE A NEW LISTENER.LOG BUT STILL THE OLD ONE IS USING BY
ORACLE.
HOW CAN I TRUNCATE THE LISTENER.LOG OR CAN I JUST SIMPLY DELETE IT OR NOT?
THANKS FOR HELP.




Hamid Alavi
Office 818 737-0526
Cell818 402-1987






=== Confidentiality Statement === 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
= End Confidentiality Statement =  


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Hamid Alavi
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Feng, Jun
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Wong, Bing
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple question

2001-05-29 Thread Ruth Gramolini

alter tablespace tablespace_name add datafile '/full_path/datafile_name.dbf'
size 100M;

This is the correct syntax.

HTH,
Ruth
- Original Message - 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:52 PM


 Does any one have an example of 'alter tablespace add datafile'
 statement?  I am having a little trouble..
 Thank you.
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 -- 
 Author: 
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ruth Gramolini
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: simple question

2001-05-29 Thread lhoska

Problem resolved.  Oracle 8 Complete Reference I was using contains an
incorrect syntax.  They use MAXSIZE instead of SIZE in the syntax.
Thank you to all of those who replied.

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:52 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Does any one have an example of 'alter tablespace add datafile'
statement?  I am having a little trouble..
Thank you.




-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple question

2001-05-29 Thread Terry Ball

alter tablespace tbs_name add datafile
'/u01/oracle/admin/data/data_02.dbf' size 200m;

If the file already exists, add reuse to the last line.

Terry

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does any one have an example of 'alter tablespace add datafile'
 statement?  I am having a little trouble..
 Thank you.

 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author:
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Terry Ball
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple question

2001-05-29 Thread Mitchell

alter tablespace tbname adddatafile '/u02/test.dbf' size 100m autoextend on
next 8m maxsize 2000m;


- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:52 PM


 Does any one have an example of 'alter tablespace add datafile'
 statement?  I am having a little trouble..
 Thank you.




 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author:
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mitchell
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: simple question

2001-05-29 Thread Rachel Carmichael

alter tablespace tablespacename
add datafile 'fullly qualified datafile name' size some size;



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: simple question
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:52:29 -0800

Does any one have an example of 'alter tablespace add datafile'
statement?  I am having a little trouble..
Thank you.




--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Rachel Carmichael
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).