On 14 November 2016 at 01:59, nickcooper-zhangtonghao
wrote:
> Hi Guru Shetty
>
> Because of public ip restrictions , I have different private IPs sharing a
> single outbound internet IP.
> The VMs with different private IPs will run different services(e.g. web,
> email, dns service).
>
> I hope OVN will support that feature. The patches I submitted may be not
> good enough. If you have any idea,
> let me know.
>
We do support it right now via LB right? i.e. one VIP:port =
PrivateIP:Port. With just one target, it acts the same as a DNAT.
>
>
> Thanks.
> Nick
>
> On Nov 12, 2016, at 6:07 AM, Guru Shetty wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delay in the reviews.
> I understand that we can extend the current DNAT feature to include
> DNAT:port. But is there is a use case where you want to use this? Any
> extensions of the NAT table can be better designed if we understand the end
> use-case for it. If not, I will just take a look at the first version of
> the series.
>
>
>
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev