RE: [ozmidwifery] Re: breastfeeding

2005-05-20 Thread Denise Fisher
Well said Lieve!!
Midwives and child health nurses must learn so much more about 
breastfeeding so that when the mother accepts this is how she will feed her 
baby, there really and truly isn't anything else out there that could have 
given her a different outcome.

Denise
On 20/05/2005 4:04:59 PM, ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au wrote:
 It always wonders me that every woman
 get's so personaly involved with a
 discussion around breastfeeding. For me it proves that the experience
 women have with feeding their children is very important and that the
 feelings around it last a lifetime. When breastfeeding failes it is very
 important that the mother has the feeling and knows that she was
 involved in the proces, that she was supported in every (informed)
 decision she makes. It is the same with c-section. When the mother
 really knows it is her way of birthing or feeding and she has made the
 neccessairy decisions, helped by really supportive midwifes and doctors
 also afterwards, it doesn't
 feel like a failure, just as a fact of life
 that not always goes as we want it to go.

 Lieve
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] RE: breastfeeding

2005-05-19 Thread Denise Fisher
I'm really disappointed to see in a supposedly professional discussion of a 
professional issue, ie breastfeeding, that name calling is resorted to very 
quickly.
The terms used by two posters, who, of course, were only reporting what 
'other' people say, were crude and vulgar to say the least. And if we have 
any colleagues of the Jewish faith in our midst they should be rightfully 
offended by referring to people who support mothers to feed their babies 
naturally with the same term as describes the group who exterminated 
millions of their people during World War II.

Please be aware of what you are saying, and what you are perpetrating by 
telling the world that 'someone else' said.

Denise
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] Re: breastfeeding

2005-05-19 Thread Denise Fisher
The trying times that Jo experienced breastfeeding will only have been 
'worth it' to we professionals if we can learn from it, and other women's 
experiences. (Jo, I'm guessing you felt it was worth it for you and your 
child regardless - taking nothing away from what you went through).

It's undeniable that artificial feeding is inferior nutrition for infants. 
So, rather than fighting for a mother's right to not have to put up with 
pain, cracks, mastitis, cellulitis, etc, etc, etc, let's direct all our 
energies into finding causes and solutions for these problems. And to 
educating our colleagues about what we have already learnt.

Oh well ... that's what makes sense to me. X;{
Denise
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] FW: Breastfeeding

2005-05-18 Thread Denise Fisher


Hi Carina
You've brought up some points that are good food for thought. It was a
tragedy the day that milk banks were closed in Australia due to the scare
with HIV, despite pasteurisation easily killing HIV (I wonder why sperm
banks weren't also closed??). I note that a new bank is opening in WA and
perhaps one in Melbourne. I wish them success.
The incidence of physiological inability to breastfeed is somewhere in
the order of 1 - 2 per 100 women. I don't believe with an incidence
at this level that it warrants we guard everything we say to every woman.
And then there's that really fascinating topic of 'guilt'. 
Can you induce guilt in someone? - maybe, if they really are guilty.
However I don't feel guilty about something I have no control over. For
example if I had no uterus I wouldn't feel guilty that I'm not adding to
Australia's population, no matter how much Mr Howard exhorts me to. If I
had no breasts or my breasts were not functional I would not feel guilty
that I'm not breastfeeding regardless of how many people told me it was
best.
My opinion is that some health professionals don't know how to support
women to breastfeed adequately and in covering their own feelings of
guilt about this they 'pretend' that it's the mother they are trying not
to make feel guilty.
To give you lots of different opinions on guilt and breastfeeding do a
google search using those terms.
Have fun
Denise
At 03:23 PM 18/05/2005 +0930, you wrote:
Some food
for thought,
What about the women who simply cannot breastfeed and cannot
produce enough milk The wet nurse is still in existence in many
tribal cultures where formulary has no influence. It’s very easy to be
passionate about something and sing it’s praises when you have
experienced success, but what about those women who don’t succeed despite
months of trying and perseverance. I, like all many midwives of course
believe that breast is best and should be promoted as optimum nutrition
for a baby but sometimes I believe that in trying to get this message
across we need to be careful not to make other women lose their
‘confidence ands fall into the motherhood guilt trap’. 

Carina

***
Denise Fisher, MMP, BN, IBCLC
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [ozmidwifery] FW: Breastfeeding

2005-05-18 Thread Denise Fisher
never a single breastfeeding problem. In between were the women with
minor problems through to those with truly dreadful stories and very few
of them seemed to be getting great advice. My dear friend had her second
child two weeks ago and the visiting midwife (from the RPA) tried to tell
her to stop demand feeding, that she was feeding way to much, should feed
only every 3-4 hours and that she must sleep more or she was in danger of
hurting herself and hurting her baby (she is an experienced breastfeeder
with great family support and knew this advice was laugable). In the end
my friend agreed with everything she said just t!
o get her out the door and make sure she never came back. So now
she is trying to figure out on her own how to deal with a sever over
supply problem and a late developing attachment problem Given she has
over 2 years breastfeeding experience I know that she will sort it out
but she should not have to do it on her own.
I am sure that most australian women give up due to poor through to
appalling advice from health professionals, possibly combined with lack
of support from their families/partners not due to a physical inability
to feed.
sorry for rambling, my fertility treatment has gone seriously wrong in
the last fortnight so my hormones are whacked and interfering with my
concentration but I really wanted to say something...
cheers
Jo


***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[ozmidwifery] Justine and TV last night

2005-04-20 Thread Denise Fisher
Well done Justine!
What I particularly liked is that they gave you the last word! and those 
words were well chosen.
Denise

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] NZ Herald Content Link sent by Barb

2005-04-06 Thread Denise Fisher


Yes. All NICU's should have moved to liquid formula by now. The only
exceptions being the specialised formulas that aren't available in liquid
form.
Actually the advice is for all infants less than a month old. So even
well full term babies who are formula fed should be having a sterile
liquid formula until they are a month old. 
Read this article too from the UK and the European recommendations.

http://tinyurl.com/4ua2n 
I'm a bit disappointed to see the staff blaming the Ministry for Health
in the article you linked us to. I would have thought that it would be
the practitioner's responsibility to keep up to date with what research
and changes were going on in the world - and the enterobacter sakazakii
contamination was well broadcast at the time it occurred in each
country.
Denise
At 09:45 PM 6/04/2005 +1200, you wrote:
Dies this mean only bottled
formulas are used in NICU's?
---

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?objectID=10118987msg=emaillink

---

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[ozmidwifery] cord care

2005-03-30 Thread Denise Fisher
Thought you may be interested in this review of the literature on cord care.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/497030?src=mp
Cheers
Denise
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] implanon and breastfeeding

2005-03-21 Thread Denise Fisher


Hi Jackie
All the progesterone-only contraceptives are safe to use while
breastfeeding; ie the breastfeeding baby will apparently not be adversely
affected.
However, some mothers are more sensitive to progesterone than others, and
these mothers may find they have a small to marked decrease in milk
supply. All of the progesterone-only contraceptives, to the best of my
knowledge, categorically say that they should not be started before 6
weeks postpartum. I know that many doctors will start them earlier, but
this does put breastmilk supply at greater risk of being affected. I
personally think that starting breastfeeding mothers on a contraceptive
so early (ie before leaving hospital most of the time) is very
paternalistic .. ie. She can't be trusted to return at 6 weeks to
get her contraception sorted out. I'll have to fix her up now!

And the fall in progesterone that happens when the placenta is
delivered is what is essential for lactogenesis II to occur. With early
discharge and the big imperative to do everything before she leaves I
wonder how often breastfeeding is actually being adversely
affected.
Implanon probably isn't too bad because it can be removed fairly simply
if this mother does find her supply is diminished. Injectables such as
Depo provera are a big problem though, because there's no going back.

The best advice is to start on the mini-pill. If there is no diminished
supply from that after a couple of months, then go to the slow-release
contraceptives.
With exclusive breastfeeding and no return of menses the risk of getting
pregnant while using no other form of contraception during the first 6
months post partum is exactly the same as it is when using the
progesterone-only pill.
BTW is implanon now approved in Australia for breastfeeding
mothers??
At 02:09 AM 22/03/2005 +1030, you wrote:
Does anyone have
any information about whether the contraceptive Implanon has any effect
on breastfeeding? Baby is 4 weeks old and feeding well.
Jackie

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [ozmidwifery] implanon and breastfeeding

2005-03-21 Thread Denise Fisher


Yes, Kim it is the one that gets inserted into the arm.
Here's a link to some info about it.

http://www.fpahealth.org.au/sex-matters/factsheets/28.html
Cheers
Denise
At 04:20 PM 22/03/2005 +1100, you wrote:
Just out of
curiosity Is implanon the one you get inserted in your arm?
What is it's recommended life? Has this replaced the Mireana
(IUD)? 

Kiwi Kim

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [ozmidwifery] sharing 'different' info

2005-03-18 Thread Denise Fisher


Hmmm not really sure why you feel you would be crucified Kim. This used
to be a pretty safe place to be. :-)
Good midwifery care doesn't stop with the birth of the baby. We follow on
with that great care, ie excellent, supportive, knowledgeable guidance,
if needed, to breastfeed. 
Breastfeeding and artificially feeding aren't of equal value for either
mother or baby. When we first meet a mother antenatally we don't say,
'And will you be having a caesar, a vacuum or a natural birth?'. We start
by assuming that she'll be having a natural birth. Likewise we shouldn't
be saying 'And how do you plan to feed your baby?'. We should assume that
she will breastfeed. Is that what you call being pressured? -
if so then does that mean we are also 'pressuring' women to have normal
births?

If we all assume normal right from the beginning (doctors too!), educate
about normal, praise women for their strength and ability to have a child
then more normal would happen. And breastfeeding is only normal - it
isn't special!
You say we all have different views and interests ... the philosophy of
midwifery doesn't and neither do its best practitioners. 
Women get pregnant so they will have a child, not to experience
childbirth. Safe, optimum, empowering, normal birth is a great way to
begin their life with their child... but it's only the beginning. We're
doing our best to try to get that experience for as many women as we can
- but let us not have fragmentation of care after birthing because it's
the 'afterwards' that is most important to most women.
But, this conversation started by suggesting great places to go to get
brilliant life-changing experiences in midwifery ... I think you would be
disappointed about the birthing situation these days in the Netherlands -
it may be happening at home, but it isn't ideal birthing and that is
borne out by the terrible breastfeeding rates which follow.
Warmly
Denise
At 06:29 PM 18/03/2005 +1100, you wrote:
I'm totally for breastfeeding
and have breastfed all 3 of my kids. What I am seeing at the
moment (can only speak for this area) is so much emphasis on
breastfeeding and so little on anything else. Sure - breastfeeding
is great and is the 'best' but I believe when a woman feels safe and
supported, she will most likely choose the best things for herself and
her baby anyway. I know a lot of these mums who are pressured
to breastfeed in hospital are giving up as soon as they leave the ward
and the hospital are only interested in the fact that they are BF at
discharge!!! Hello.. isn't the long term important
too. It's time to get back to the basics - women need
antenatal education, optimial health, healthy lifestyles etc. They
need to be told that pregnancy and birth are normal life events unless
otherwise indicated and not something that needs to be controlled or
monitiored at every opportunity. When we give women more education,
more time, more support, better care.then I am sure a good proportion
will make the right choices for their individual circumstances which will
include BF. A lot of these women don't even know what will be good
for them in the long-term!

Of course we all have different views and interests and coming from the
outside. this maternity system still has a very long way to
go 

Just my thoughts. Crucify me if you
wish.

Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [ozmidwifery] sharing 'different' info

2005-03-17 Thread Denise Fisher
I wouldn't glorify birthing in the Netherlands too much - their 
breastfeeding rates are amongst the lowest in the World. A wonderful birth 
experience is the best way to start (extrauterine) life - but to be 
breastfed will have a longer term effect on the health and well being of 
the baby and mother.

Denise
At 02:39 PM 18/03/2005 +1100, you wrote:
Well I would go to Holland and 'See'  birth as it should be then I would 
go to NZ and spend time with Maggie Banks - breech birth and guru 
midwife!!!  I'd then probably go to the US and visit with Ina May Gaskin 
on the farm!  Dreams are free!!!

Kiwi Kim
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Red heads

2005-02-21 Thread Denise Fisher




http://tinyurl.com/3ubg7 
This may have been it Natalie. I didn't note the article at the time, and
this is just from a pubmed search I've just done.
Cheers
Denise
At 12:24 PM 22/02/2005 +0800, you wrote:
do you know where we could find
this article?, as I'd like to know for personal and professional reasons
the implications of being a redhead


***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[ozmidwifery] Red heads

2005-02-20 Thread Denise Fisher


You may be right Kirsten. I read a very interesting article (in a medical
journal) about how redheads respond to drugs quite differently, and in
particular to anaesthetics. 
I found it fascinating.
Denise
Who used to be a brunette. :-) 
At 03:53 PM 21/02/2005 +0930, you wrote:

evidently being a red head (naturally
of course!) means we have a tendency to bleed more. Also prone to low
iron retention.

Something to do with a clotting factor
missing.Genetic.

Its all been researched and seems
quite well known.

Kirsten
A red head

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning

http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[ozmidwifery] suctioning

2004-12-06 Thread Denise Fisher


This is an except from the Health e-Learning online course BE04:
Breastfeeding Initiation and the First Week.
[quote] Oral aversion as an outcome of routine oropharyngeal or gastric
suctioning or intubation is often cited by clinicians as a cause of
breastfeeding difficulty, but little research is available to confirm
this.
Waltman (2004), in a small study of healthy term neonates, showed no
benefits of oropharnygeal suctioning but statistically significant slower
heart rate for 20 minutes in the suctioned group. A Cochrane review
(Halliday, 2004) likewise recommends the routine practice of endotracheal
intubation and suctioning of vigorous, term neonates due to the presence
of meconium-stained liquor be abandoned as it has no beneficial outcome.
Routine gastric suctioning, involving the passage of a tube into the
neonate's stomach and aspiration of the contents has been linked to an
increased prevalence of functional intestinal disorders in later life
(Anand, 2004). Widstrom (1987) noted that gastric suctioning delayed the
infant's prefeeding behaviors.
However, the most telling outcome of these unnecessary procedures is
described by Deneyer et al (1992). Twelve full-term newborns with vague
symptoms related to the upper gastrointestinal tract (anorexia, poor
feeding, retching, regurgitation, and incessant crying) were diagnosed,
by esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed between days 2 and 5 of life,
with extremely severe esophagitis (circular ulcerations). When all other
possible causes of this condition were eliminated it was determined to
have been caused by pharyngeal, esophageal, or gastric suction at birth.
[unquote]
And the References for the studies cited:
Waltman PA, Brewer JM, Rogers BP, May WL. (2004) Building evidence for
practice: a pilot study of newborn bulb suctioning at birth. J
Midwifery Womens Health.; 49(1):32-8. 
Halliday HL, Sweet D. (2004) Endotracheal intubation at birth for
preventing morbidity and mortality in vigorous, meconium-stained infants
born at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3.
Chichester, UK: John Wiley  Sons, Ltd. 
Deneyer M, Goossens A, Pipeleers-Marichal M, Hauser B, Blecker U, Sacre
L, Vandenplas Y. (1992) Esophagitis of likely traumatic origin in
newborns. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.; 15(1):81-4. 
Anand KJ, Runeson B, Jacobson B. (2004) Gastric suction at birth
associated with long-term risk for functional intestinal disorders in
later life. J Pediatr.; 144(4):449-54. 
Widstrom AM, Ransjo-Arvidson AB, Christensson K, Matthiesen AS, Winberg
J, Uvnas-Moberg K. (1987) Gastric suction in healthy newborn infants.
Effects on circulation and developing feeding behaviour. Acta Paediatr
Scand.; 76(4):566-72. 
Yes, I know - this could be construed as flagrant self-promotion, and I
will apologise to those who are offended by me posting this. I have only
done so because it fits exactly into the main topic of conversation on
the list at the moment and I feel it adds to the already posted
comments.
Denise

***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[ozmidwifery] serum protein, stillbirth, delayed lactation

2004-11-22 Thread Denise Fisher
Is anyone in Aus doing any research on serum protein levels during 
pregnancy? I've just seen this medscape article which is interesting ..
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/493517?src=mp
and learnt of the work of Dawn Hunter from NZ who presented at the Sydney 
ALCA conference this year who found gross oedema, particularly of the 
breasts and delayed lactogenesis II in women until their low serum albumin 
levels approached normal.

I'd love to hear of any work going on in this area.
Cheers
Denise
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] gestational diabetes and antenatal ebm

2004-11-16 Thread Denise Fisher
Hi Marilyn
I won't swear to it but I don't know that there is any research out there 
on this practice. However to give newborns their own mother's milk is kinda 
natural and not really something that we need research to prove is a good 
thing do we? Wouldn't it be more to the point to ask those who are giving 
newborns something other than breastmilk to come up with the evidence to 
prove that what they are doing is not detrimental?? I'd like to see that 
... could have them running around in circles for years trying to find 
anything to support that practice as opposed to giving mother's own colostrum.
All you really need proof of is that expressing antenatally won't put a 
mother into preterm labor, which it won't and I'm sure you'll find plenty 
out there on that - then ensure that the mothers know how to store and 
transport their milk safely when the time comes.

There's lots more than just giving breastmilk though that can stabilise the 
newborn's glucose levels quickly and efficiently - starting with 
undisturbed skin-to-skin on mother's chest from the moment of birthing.

I really do implore everyone to think long and hard before scampering 
around trying to find research articles to prove what is normal and natural 
while practices using what is detrimental to 
birthing/breastfeeding/whatever continue without questioning.  Please 
consider looking the perpetrators in the eye and saying First, do no harm! 
- your practice is not 'normal' - prove to me that it is doing no harm!!

Cheers
Denise
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Homer

2004-11-07 Thread Denise Fisher


You could do worse Ping - Homer was quite a noted author (Odyssey, Iliad)
and in this esteemed group of educated men and women, I can't think who
else you could be thinking of ;-)
At 01:52 PM 7/11/2004, you wrote:
Hi
Rita, 
Believe me, I thought Homer is my middle name ; -))
Ping

**
Denise Fisher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.health-e-learning.com
**



[ozmidwifery] cold epidurals

2004-11-04 Thread Denise Fisher
Someone recently mentioned the advent of 'cold epidurals', where the 
epidural is put in place before an induction is started. I'd not heard of 
this before and was shocked!  But is it unreasonable? Vincent  Chestnut 
(1998) gave the administration of IV oxytocin intrapartum as the most 
useful predictor of which women will request epidural anaesthesia during 
labour. What's the incidence?? I don't know but guess it's pretty high. 
When would be the best time to put an epidural in - when a woman is 
distressed and moving experiencing strong labour pain, or before it all 
starts and she is lying still and quiet?
It's the outcome here, ie use of cold epidurals, that horrifies me when it 
should be the number of unnecessary inductions or perhaps the way 
inductions are conducted that force a woman into acute pain so quickly that 
should be reviewed.

It's a while since I've worked in birthing suite. Those of you who are 
familiar with inductions why do they HAVE to be so rugged?

Denise
***
Denise Fisher, MMP, IBCLC
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] lactobacillus and candida

2004-11-03 Thread Denise Fisher


Thought you may find this article of interest:
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7465/548
To avoid developing vulvovaginal candidiasis after antibiotic
use, many women use complementary and alternative therapies,
including lactobacillus in various forms (e.g., oral capsules,
vaginal suppositories, yogurt). In this Australian study, 278
women (age range, 18-50) with nongynecologic infections were
randomized to receive one of four regimens during 6 days of
antibiotic use and 4 days thereafter: an oral
lactobacillus-containing powder (one-half teaspoon twice
daily) and a lactobacillus-containing vaginal suppository
(once daily at bedtime); oral lactobacillus and vaginal
placebo; vaginal lactobacillus and oral placebo; or double
placebo. 
Women completed symptom surveys and provided self-collected
vaginal-swab specimens at baseline and either 4 days after
completing their randomized treatment or when symptoms
developed. Cases were defined as women with symptoms plus
candida isolated from the follow-up swab; asymptomatic women
with positive cultures were not considered cases.

The trial was terminated when enrollment was 62% complete
because interim analysis showed no evidence of treatment
benefit. Of the 235 women with complete outcome data (85% of
those randomized), 55 developed symptomatic vaginal
candidiasis. The incidence was 24% with oral and vaginal
lactobacillus, 24% with oral lactobacillus and vaginal
placebo, 29% with vaginal lactobacillus and oral placebo, and
17% with double placebo. The resulting odds ratios for
developing candidiasis were 1.06 for oral lactobacillus and
1.38 for vaginal lactobacillus (both ORs were nonsignificant).

Comment: Despite conventional wisdom encouraging women to
use lactobacillus preparations to prevent yeast infections
after antibiotic use, this small but well-designed study
demonstrated no benefit from this practice. In fact, the
findings suggest the potential for harm. Based on this study,
clinicians should discourage patients from using these
products to prevent post-antibiotic yeast infections.


***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com




[ozmidwifery] Introduction and request

2004-11-02 Thread Denise Fisher
Hi everyone
I've just recently re-joined ozmidwifery after a long absence and have been 
'lurking' for a few days. I have a request now so thought I should 
re-introduce myself.
I live in Brisbane and have been a midwife since 1980, training at King 
Edward in Perth and have worked in Queensland and Tasmania. For the last 
few years I have been involved entirely in education, setting up my own 
training company, Health e-Learning, which, as the name implies, delivers 
education for health professionals via the internet. At this stage most of 
the courses we offer are on lactation.

My request: someone from this list just sent an email about a study on 
epidurals and I deleted it before I realised that I really did want it 
:-/  Would someone please send it to me again at my private email address.

Thank you
Denise
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] pain relief/epidural article

2004-11-02 Thread Denise Fisher
Thank you.
Denise
At 11:49 AM 3/11/2004 +1100, you wrote:
Here's the article again for Deinise  others who may
have missed it.
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] pain relief/epidural article

2004-11-02 Thread Denise Fisher
Well said Andrea. I've just finished researching the effects of birthing 
interventions for the review of one of our online courses and have been 
surprised by the number of women who have told me that they didn't know 
that epidurals had ANY effect on the baby, and of course only very rare 
effects on them well it just ain't so!  And they think this because 
that is what they are told .. by doctors.
OK I'm generalising - I know we do have many good doctors out there who 
tell it like it is ... could those people please forgive me.

Denise
At 02:45 PM 3/11/2004 +1100, Andrea wrote:
What many women don't realise is that when they choose an epidural to 
avoid an opioid drug they are not told that the epidural medication is a 
mixture of an anaesathetic (usually bupivacaine) and an opioid, usually 
Fentanyl.  Many midwives I have spoken to are surprised about this as well 
- they have just not considered that even this amount of an opiate can 
have an impact on the woman and he baby.
***
Denise Fisher
Health e-Learning
http://www.health-e-learning.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.