[Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). no perl-sig CC? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 237336] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237336 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Dunno if you wanted CC perl-sig too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). (I am not sure how Perl SIG is handling perl-sig in pkgdb.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603629] Review Request: cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603629 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603629] Review Request: cf-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts - Goudy Oldstyle and Italic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603629 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603631] Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603631 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 603631] Review Request: moyogo-molengo-fonts - A Latin typeface for documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603631 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736717] Review Request: lcmaps - Grid (X.509) and VOMS credentials to local account mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717 --- Comment #59 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736717] Review Request: lcmaps - Grid (X.509) and VOMS credentials to local account mapping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025369] Review Request: bugwarrior - Sync github, bitbucket, and trac issues with taskwarrior
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025369 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1025369] Review Request: bugwarrior - Sync github, bitbucket, and trac issues with taskwarrior
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025369 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108781] Review Request: python-ZODB - Zope Object Database and persistence
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108781 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108781] Review Request: python-ZODB - Zope Object Database and persistence
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108781 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122940] Review Request: rubygem-capybara_minitest_spec - Capybara + MiniTest::Spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122940 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135430] Review Request: python-XStatic-jquery-ui - jquery-ui (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135430 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135430] Review Request: python-XStatic-jquery-ui - jquery-ui (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135430 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135867] Review Request: ghc-stm-chans - Additional types of channels for STM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135867 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135874] Review Request: ghc-monad-loops - Monadic loops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135874 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135867] Review Request: ghc-stm-chans - Additional types of channels for STM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135867 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135874] Review Request: ghc-monad-loops - Monadic loops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135874 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135906] Review Request: ghc-http-date - HTTP Date parser and formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135906 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135906] Review Request: ghc-http-date - HTTP Date parser and formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135906 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138338] Review Request: specialelite-fonts - Special Elite fonts by Brian J. Bonislawsky
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138338 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140136] Review Request: python-tooz - Coordination library for distributed systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140136 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140136] Review Request: python-tooz - Coordination library for distributed systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140136 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191516] Review Request: perl-Pod-Readme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191516 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- All perl packages are supposed to carry perl-sig. Due to the often lengthy series of dep-chains perl-modules come along with, this is helpful to notify others about changes, problems, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141876] Review Request: nodejs-ansidiff - ANSI colored text diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141876 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141876] Review Request: nodejs-ansidiff - ANSI colored text diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141876 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141877] Review Request: nodejs-es5-shim - ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141877 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141877] Review Request: nodejs-es5-shim - ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141877 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141926] Review Request: python-rfc3986 - Validating URI References per RFC 3986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141926 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141926] Review Request: python-rfc3986 - Validating URI References per RFC 3986
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141926 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 458654] Review Request: perl-Text-Aligner - Text::Aligner Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458654 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #5) Git done (by process-git-requests). (I am not sure how Perl SIG is handling perl-sig in pkgdb.) perl-sig added watchbugzilla and watchcommits. Packages with InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-l...@redhat.com likely predate perl-sig. Seems to me as if at least some of these pkgdb entries got lost in thoughtout some PkgDB redesigns (Read: The PkgDB seems to suffer from corruption). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142276] Review Request: python-kgb - Utilities for spying on function calls in unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142276 Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|rku...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #4 from Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com --- @Haïkel feel free to take it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141861] Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog - Leveled execution logs for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141861 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org --- Changes here: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/pull/8/files Summary: gopath not redefined, timestamps of copied files preserved, license corrected. Specfile follows package guidelines as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go Package approved subject to specfile update as per above link -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142276] Review Request: python-kgb - Utilities for spying on function calls in unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142276
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
@Robert: thank you, I owe you a review, feel free to ping me :)
As for the review, since this package complies with Fedora packaging
guidelines, I hereby approve it into Fedora Packages Collection. Please,
Stephen submit a scm request !
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
MIT/X11 (BSD like), Unknown or generated. 8 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1142276-python-
kgb-0.2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]:
[Bug 1141097] Review Request: python-glance-store - OpenStack image store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141097 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-glance-store Short Description: OpenStack Image Service Store Library Upstream URL: https://github.com/openstack/glance_store Owners: hguemar flaper87 Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #69 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #68) You probably saw I posted to devel@ earlier today about issues with rpath/runpath. I was waiting for some comment on that before replying, but none so far... You're probably aware of this, but there are two points in the rpmlint wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath The second one, Rpath for Internal Libraries, seems to apply to us. [...] Yes, copying these files from Julia git seems to work, but then I need to carry the patch and move files around by hand. Is it really worth it? I'd prefer fixing this upstream directly, I've filed an issue: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8378 I asked it because I know it should be easy, and would greatly increase the quality of the package, and/or, it could detect problems in the documentation itself. While waiting for upstream, please make a simple patch to get html documentation built. You will make the reviewer a lot happier :) OK, done. :-) [..] It would be better to not make the libjulia.so symlink to start with. I don't think so, as GUIs embedding Julia, like iJulia, may need to link to it. I realize this may be an argument in favor of adding a SOVERSION. I guess I should ask upstream about that. Actually, I'm starting to think I should stop installing libjulia.so to /usr/lib64, as this is not done by default by Julia, and there's the SOVERSION issue. So for now I've removed it, and we'll see if something like iJulia needs it later. [...] AFAIK what should work is to check what rpm -q --requires dSFMT-devel outputs and add that, but it would change from arch to arch, and is an ugly and fragile hack, e.g. on x86_64: Requires: libdSFMT.so.2.2()(64bit) Ah, it's unfortunate. That would have been the best solution to handle dlopen()ed dependencies in the long term. Anyway, in case it may be helpful, this is how I avoid rpmlint warnings on dangling symlinks in sagemath: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath.spec#n1102 you could write something like this in %post: ln -sf /usr/lib64/libdSFMT.so.2 /usr/lib64/julia/libdSFMT.so OK, done. But now rpmlint grants me with a julia.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln julia.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm New version: Spec URL: http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia.spec SRPM URL: http://nalimilan.perso.neuf.fr/transfert/julia-0.3.0-5.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1134840] Review Request: python3-script - Help for writing shell scripts in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134840
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
- /usr/lib/python3.4/... directories are owned by python2-libs.
Installed for dependencies.
$ repoquery -f /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages --releasever=rawhide
--disablerepo=rpmfusion*
python3-libs-0:3.4.1-14.fc22.i686
python3-libs-0:3.4.1-14.fc22.x86_64
python3-libs-0:3.4.1-14.fc22.x86_64
python3-flask-whooshee-0:0.0.6-4.fc21.noarch
python3-flask-whooshee-0:0.0.6-4.fc21.noarch
python3-libs-0:3.4.1-14.fc22.i686
False positive.
- I have some doubts about License. Upstream does not provide a license's copy
file but adverts on README.txt file that:
* license : Copyright (c) 2010 by Iain Lamb. Licensed to PSF under a
Contributor Agreement.
See http://www.python.org/3.1/license for details.
That link does not exist.
I think that upstream should fix the license issue and include a COPYING or
License file.
Also, Fedora Packaging Guidelines refers to a Python2 license
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses). Can we handle
Python3 at same way?
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[?]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/sagitter/1134840-python3-script/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under
[Bug 1141097] Review Request: python-glance-store - OpenStack image store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141097 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141097] Review Request: python-glance-store - OpenStack image store library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141097 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142753] New: Review Request: python-oslo-serialization - OpenStack oslo.serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142753 Bug ID: 1142753 Summary: Review Request: python-oslo-serialization - OpenStack oslo.serialization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ns...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://nsaje.fedorapeople.org/review/python-oslo-serialization.spec SRPM URL: https://nsaje.fedorapeople.org/review/python-oslo-serialization-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: An OpenStack library for representing objects in transmittable and storable formats. Fedora Account System Username: nsaje Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7603167 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142757] New: Review Request: perl-Module-CoreList - What modules are shipped with versions of perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142757 Bug ID: 1142757 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-CoreList - What modules are shipped with versions of perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-CoreList/perl-Module-CoreList.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Module-CoreList/perl-Module-CoreList-5.20140914-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Module::CoreList provides information on which core and dual-life modules are shipped with each version of perl. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar This is a dual-lived module which already exist as perl.spec's subpackage. The subpackage will be disabled in the perl.spec after getting this standalone package into Fedora. Also the subpackage will be split in the perl.spec to align with the standalone one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1134840] Review Request: python3-script - Help for writing shell scripts in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134840 --- Comment #2 from Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com --- Thanks for the review. I've asked the author about fixing the license link and including a copy of it. Anyway, the PKG-INFO file states that the license is Python Software Foundation License -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141861] Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog - Leveled execution logs for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141861 --- Comment #3 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- Changes applied Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-golang-glog/golang-github-golang-glog.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-golang-glog/golang-github-golang-glog-0-0.2.gitd1c4472.fc21.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7603306 Thanks Lokesh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142753] Review Request: python-oslo-serialization - OpenStack oslo.serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142753 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142757] Review Request: perl-Module-CoreList - What modules are shipped with versions of perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142757 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142437] Review Request: wallpoet-fonts - Wallpoet font by Lars Berggren
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142437 Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: wallpoet-fonts Short Description: Wallpoet font by Lars Berggren Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Wallpoet Owners: jujens Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: fonts-sig, i18n-team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121745] Review Request: php53-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121745
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
I was hoping someone else will review, this package... seems bad practice to
review one of myspec... so will only review the change...
About
BuildRequires: php-cli
Strangely is works... (and pull php53-cli)
I would have have prefer
BuildRequires: php-cli 5.3
or
BuildRequires: php53-cli
Minor issue in the inter-package dependencies.
In php53-tcpdf-gnufree*, missing
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
See
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/php-tcpdf.git/commit/?id=7e768582a676e481024a96fe6ef2091fafef8c6c
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7603707
Installation test:
# yum --nogpgcheck localinstall /tmp/php53-tcpdf*
...
Installing:
php53-tcpdf noarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos /php53-tcpdf-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts noarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fontsnoarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-dejavu-lgc-serif-fontsnoarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-dejavu-sans-fonts noarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-dejavu-sans-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-dejavu-sans-mono-fontsnoarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-dejavu-serif-fontsnoarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-dejavu-serif-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-gnu-free-mono-fonts noarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-gnu-free-mono-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-gnu-free-sans-fonts noarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-gnu-free-sans-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
php53-tcpdf-gnu-free-serif-fonts noarch
6.0.091-1.el5.centos
/php53-tcpdf-gnu-free-serif-fonts-6.0.091-1.el5.centos.noarch
Installing for dependencies:
dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts noarch 2.33-4.el5
epel
dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fontsnoarch 2.33-4.el5
epel
dejavu-lgc-serif-fontsnoarch 2.33-4.el5
epel
dejavu-sans-mono-fontsnoarch 2.33-4.el5
epel
dejavu-serif-fontsnoarch 2.33-4.el5
epel
php53-bcmath x86_64
5.3.3-23.el5_10updates
php53-cli x86_64
5.3.3-23.el5_10updates
php53-common x86_64
5.3.3-23.el5_10updates
php53-gd x86_64
5.3.3-23.el5_10updates
php53-mbstringx86_64
5.3.3-23.el5_10updates
php53-mcrypt x86_64 5.3.3-1.el5
epel
php53-tidyx86_64 5.3.3-1.el5
epel
php53-xml x86_64
5.3.3-23.el5_10updates
...
So everything seems ok.
Just need to fix the inter-packages dependency.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142422] Review Request: unifrakturmaguntia-fonts - Font that provide a Fraktur typeface that may be embedded on websites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142422 Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |unifrakturmaguntia-fonts - |unifrakturmaguntia-fonts - |UnifrakturMaguntia font by |Font that provide a Fraktur |Peter Wiegel|typeface that may be ||embedded on websites --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu --- 1) Removed 2) Fixed 3) Good suggestion. Done. 4) Changed. Note This font is created by j. 'mach' wust, Gerrit Ansmann and Georg Duffner and not by Peter Wiegel as per FontLog.txt Indeed. It is only inspired from a font by Peter Wiegel. Spec URL: http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/unifrakturmaguntia-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/unifrakturmaguntia-fonts-0-0.2.20140706.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121745] Review Request: php53-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121745 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/php53-tcpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/php53-tcpdf-6.0.091-2.src.rpm If you agree, I would like to merge my php53-tcpdf specific changes into the regular php-tcpdf spec file thus maintaining the package gets easier; actually that is 10 small %if sections plus the adapted build requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070946] Review Request: python-SimpleCV - Open source framework for building computer vision applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946 Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||961642 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642 [Bug 961642] Review Request: ubuntu-font-family - The fonts used in Ubuntu Linux -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961642] Review Request: ubuntu-font-family - The fonts used in Ubuntu Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642 Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juj...@jujens.eu Blocks||1070946 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070946 [Bug 1070946] Review Request: python-SimpleCV - Open source framework for building computer vision applications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121745] Review Request: php53-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121745 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Created attachment 938452 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=938452action=edit diff.txt = diff -u /work/fedora/php-tcpdf/php-tcpdf.spec php53-tcpdf.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142445] Review Request: cyreal-wireone-fonts - Wire One font by Alexei Vanyashin and Gayaneh Bagdasaryan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142445 Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |wireone-fonts - Wire One|cyreal-wireone-fonts - Wire |font by Alexei Vanyashin|One font by Alexei |and Gayaneh Bagdasaryan |Vanyashin and Gayaneh ||Bagdasaryan --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu --- 1) Indeed. Fixed. 2) So do I. Spec URL: http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/cyreal-wireone-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1133950] Review Request: mariadb_client - Client library used to connect apps. developed in C/C++ to MariaDB and MySQL databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133950 --- Comment #5 from Matej Mužila mmuz...@redhat.com --- I've made required changes. SRPM: https://mmuzila.fedorapeople.org/mariadb-connector-c-2.0.0-2.fc20.src.rpm SPEC: https://mmuzila.fedorapeople.org/mariadb-connector-c.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142399] Review Request: golang-github-goamz - An Amazon Library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142399 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||l...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141822] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2 - OAuth 2.0 for Go clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822 --- Comment #3 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- Changes applied Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-googlecode-goauth2/golang-googlecode-goauth2.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-googlecode-goauth2/golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.2.hgafe77d958c70.fc21.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7603958 Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138338] Review Request: specialelite-fonts - Special Elite fonts by Brian J. Bonislawsky
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138338 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142276] Review Request: python-kgb - Utilities for spying on function calls in unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142276 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-kgb Short Description: Utilities for spying on function calls in unit tests Upstream URL: https://github.com/beanbaginc/kgb Owners: sgallagh Branches: f21 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138338] Review Request: specialelite-fonts - Special Elite fonts by Brian J. Bonislawsky
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138338 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- specialelite-fonts-1.000-0.2.20140913hg.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/specialelite-fonts-1.000-0.2.20140913hg.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138338] Review Request: specialelite-fonts - Special Elite fonts by Brian J. Bonislawsky
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138338 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- specialelite-fonts-1.000-0.2.20140913hg.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/specialelite-fonts-1.000-0.2.20140913hg.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121745] Review Request: php53-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121745 Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck red...@linuxnetz.de --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php53-tcpdf Short Description: PHP class for generating PDF documents and barcodes Upstream URL: http://www.tcpdf.org Owners: robert Branches: el5 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138610] Review Request: xacml - SAML 2.0 profile of XACML v2.0 library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138610 --- Comment #4 from Dennis van Dok denni...@nikhef.nl --- Spec URL: https://ndpfsvn.nikhef.nl/ro/mwsec/packaging/fedora/branches/rawhide/xacml.spec SRPM URL: http://software.nikhef.nl/experimental/fedora/xacml-1.5.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Set the two obsoletes to 1.1.0-1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121745] Review Request: php53-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121745 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121745] Review Request: php53-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121745 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142276] Review Request: python-kgb - Utilities for spying on function calls in unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142276 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142430] Review Request: vt323-fonts - VT323 font by Peter Hull
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142430 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142430] Review Request: vt323-fonts - VT323 font by Peter Hull
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142430 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142437] Review Request: wallpoet-fonts - Wallpoet font by Lars Berggren
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142437 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142437] Review Request: wallpoet-fonts - Wallpoet font by Lars Berggren
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142437 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141887] Review Request: golang-github-kr-pretty - Provides pretty-printing for go values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141887 --- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- Changes applied: Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-kr-pretty/golang-github-kr-pretty.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-kr-pretty/golang-github-kr-pretty-0-0.2.git5feda8d.fc21.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7604274 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142757] Review Request: perl-Module-CoreList - What modules are shipped with versions of perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142757 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Everything seems just right. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142757] Review Request: perl-Module-CoreList - What modules are shipped with versions of perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142757 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Module-CoreList Short Description: What modules are shipped with versions of perl Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-CoreList/ Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142422] Review Request: unifrakturmaguntia-fonts - Font that provide a Fraktur typeface that may be embedded on websites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142422 Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: unifrakturmaguntia-fonts Short Description: Font that provide a Fraktur typeface that may be embedded on websites Upstream URL: http://unifraktur.sourceforge.net/maguntia.html Owners: jujens Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: fonts-sig, i18n-team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122940] Review Request: rubygem-capybara_minitest_spec - Capybara + MiniTest::Spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122940 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-09-17 09:55:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dSFMT-2.2.3-4.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dSFMT-2.2.3-4.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141877] Review Request: nodejs-es5-shim - ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141877 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141877] Review Request: nodejs-es5-shim - ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141877 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-es5-shim-4.0.3-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-es5-shim-4.0.3-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141877] Review Request: nodejs-es5-shim - ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141877 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-es5-shim-4.0.3-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-es5-shim-4.0.3-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141877] Review Request: nodejs-es5-shim - ECMAScript 5 compatibility shims for legacy JavaScript engines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141877 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-es5-shim-4.0.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-es5-shim-4.0.3-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dSFMT-2.2.3-4.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dSFMT-2.2.3-4.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dSFMT-2.2.3-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dSFMT-2.2.3-4.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- dSFMT-2.2.3-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dSFMT-2.2.3-4.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141876] Review Request: nodejs-ansidiff - ANSI colored text diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141876 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141876] Review Request: nodejs-ansidiff - ANSI colored text diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141876 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ansidiff-1.0.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ansidiff-1.0.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141876] Review Request: nodejs-ansidiff - ANSI colored text diffs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141876 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-ansidiff-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-ansidiff-1.0.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142437] Review Request: wallpoet-fonts - Wallpoet font by Lars Berggren
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142437] Review Request: wallpoet-fonts - Wallpoet font by Lars Berggren
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142437 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- wallpoet-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wallpoet-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141822] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2 - OAuth 2.0 for Go clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: golang-googlecode-goauth2 Short Description: OAuth 2.0 for Go clients Upstream URL: https://code.google.com/p/goauth2/ Owners: jchaloup lsm5 vbatts Branches: f21 f20 f19 el6 InitialCC: golang-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142445] Review Request: cyreal-wireone-fonts - Wire One font by Alexei Vanyashin and Gayaneh Bagdasaryan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142445 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142445] Review Request: cyreal-wireone-fonts - Wire One font by Alexei Vanyashin and Gayaneh Bagdasaryan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142445 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142445] Review Request: cyreal-wireone-fonts - Wire One font by Alexei Vanyashin and Gayaneh Bagdasaryan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142445 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-0.1.20140916hg.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141861] Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog - Leveled execution logs for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141861 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: golang-github-golang-glog Short Description: Leveled execution logs for Go Upstream URL: https://github.com/golang/glog/ Owners: jchaloup lsm5 vbatts Branches: f21 f20 f19 el6 InitialCC: golang-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
