[Bug 1173375] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Create, design, and edit SQLite database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sqlitebrowser-3.4.0-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-01-06 01:11:43 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sqlitebrowser-3.4.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060924] Review Request: rubygem-unicode - Unicode normalization library for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060924 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-unicode-0.4.4.1-2.f ||c21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-01-06 01:12:01 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-unicode-0.4.4.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169140] Review Request: nodejs-util - Node.JS util module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169140 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-util-0.10.3-2.el7|nodejs-util-0.10.3-2.fc21 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-util-0.10.3-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176893] Review Request: nodejs-node-int64 - Support for representing 64-bit integers in JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||nodejs-node-int64-0.3.2-1.f ||c21 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-node-int64-0.3.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176893] Review Request: nodejs-node-int64 - Support for representing 64-bit integers in JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-node-int64-0.3.2-1.f |nodejs-node-int64-0.3.2-1.f |c21 |c20 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-node-int64-0.3.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178934] Review Request: perl-Exporter-Tidy - Another way of exporting symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178934 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok. Source archive is original (SHA-256: 27734cb4972921824d3cc98428628e81887efa6e97eb4c0cb628a9225fb7f160). Ok. Summary verified from Tidy.pm. Ok. Description verified from Tidy.pm. Ok. TODO: Insert some statement into the description that this is about Perl. E.g. This Perl module serves. TODO: Remove bundled Test::More and Test::Builder from t/lib to use system ones when running tests. FIX: The README states public domain, but the Tidy.pm stats: Pick your favourite OSI approved license :) http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical These two contradicts (Public Domain is not on the list). You need to add the Tidy.pm's license to the License tag. Either list all OSI-approved licenses, or get a new Tidy.pm without the statement from the author. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. FIX: Do not build-require Test::More, or remove the bundled module and do not build-require its dependencies. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Exporter-Tidy.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.07-1.fc22.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.07-1.fc22.noarch.rpm perl-Exporter-Tidy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subclassed - sub classed, sub-classed, subclass ed perl-Exporter-Tidy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace - name space, name-space, names pace perl-Exporter-Tidy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subclassed - sub classed, sub-classed, subclass ed perl-Exporter-Tidy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace - name space, name-space, names pace 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.07-1.fc22.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jan 6 07:11 /usr/share/doc/perl-Exporter-Tidy -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 308 Sep 14 2007 /usr/share/doc/perl-Exporter-Tidy/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4953 Mar 30 2003 /usr/share/doc/perl-Exporter-Tidy/README -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3134 Jan 6 07:11 /usr/share/man/man3/Exporter::Tidy.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jan 6 07:11 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Exporter -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 6426 Sep 14 2007 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Exporter/Tidy.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.07-1.fc22.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) 1 perl(Carp) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.07-1.fc22.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(Exporter::Tidy) = 0.07 1 perl-Exporter-Tidy = 0.07-1.fc22 Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Exporter-Tidy-0.07-1.fc22.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package builds in F22 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8537319). Ok. Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Please correct all `FIX' items, consider fixinf `TODO' items, and provide a new spec file. Resolution: Package NOT approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173375] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Create, design, and edit SQLite database files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|sqlitebrowser-3.4.0-2.fc20 |sqlitebrowser-3.4.0-2.fc21 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sqlitebrowser-3.4.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120771] Review Request: uronode - Alternative packet radio system for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120771 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|uronode-2.2-1.fc21 |uronode-2.2-1.fc20 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- uronode-2.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058765] Review Request: mono-cecil - Library to generate and inspect programs and libraries in the ECMA CIL form
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058765 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-01-06 01:16:48 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc21, mono-cecil-0.9.5-3.20140924git6d1b7d0.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176887] Review Request: nodejs-crc32-stream - A streaming CRC32 checksumer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176887 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-crc32-stream-0.3.1-1 |nodejs-crc32-stream-0.3.1-1 |.fc20 |.fc21 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- nodejs-crc32-stream-0.3.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl ||) --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- Ah, scratch that, on closer examination the only GPLed files are auto-generated by Bison (and there is an exception allowing relicensing as long as the product is not a parser generator), and the rest are only used at build time and described in LICENSE.txt (which you should include, I think, in addition to COPYING.txt) I'm working through the rest of the review, but while doing that, I'm a bit concerned that libSBML bundles MiniZip. Might need an FPC exception for that... we should try and look for precedents first? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1153733] Review Request: golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud - The Go SDK for Openstack http://gophercloud.io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153733 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud-1.0.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud-1.0.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162091] Review Request: golang-github-rakyll-statik - Embed static files into a Go executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-rakyll-statik-0-0.1.gitf19d7c2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-rakyll-statik-0-0.1.gitf19d7c2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162091] Review Request: golang-github-rakyll-statik - Embed static files into a Go executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-rakyll-statik-0-0.1.gitf19d7c2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-rakyll-statik-0-0.1.gitf19d7c2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162091] Review Request: golang-github-rakyll-statik - Embed static files into a Go executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162106] Review Request: golang-github-kimor79-gollectd - A go parser for the collectd binary protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kimor79-gollectd-0-0.1.git1d0fc88.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-kimor79-gollectd-0-0.1.git1d0fc88.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162106] Review Request: golang-github-kimor79-gollectd - A go parser for the collectd binary protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kimor79-gollectd-0-0.1.git1d0fc88.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-kimor79-gollectd-0-0.1.git1d0fc88.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162106] Review Request: golang-github-kimor79-gollectd - A go parser for the collectd binary protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kimor79-gollectd-0-0.1.git1d0fc88.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-kimor79-gollectd-0-0.1.git1d0fc88.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162106] Review Request: golang-github-kimor79-gollectd - A go parser for the collectd binary protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162091] Review Request: golang-github-rakyll-statik - Embed static files into a Go executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-rakyll-statik-0-0.1.gitf19d7c2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-rakyll-statik-0-0.1.gitf19d7c2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162103] Review Request: golang-github-dgnorton-goback - A simple non-database related transaction library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162103 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162103] Review Request: golang-github-dgnorton-goback - A simple non-database related transaction library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162103 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-dgnorton-goback-0-0.1.gita49ca3c.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-dgnorton-goback-0-0.1.gita49ca3c.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162103] Review Request: golang-github-dgnorton-goback - A simple non-database related transaction library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162103 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-dgnorton-goback-0-0.1.gita49ca3c.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-dgnorton-goback-0-0.1.gita49ca3c.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177739] Review Request: rubygem-vte3 - Ruby binding of VTE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177739 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-01-06 01:37:55 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Pushed into rawhide, push requested on F-21, closing. Thank you for review and git procedure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name --- Created attachment 976718 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=976718action=edit License check License check results. The non-LGPL files need to be examined more carefully, esp since some of them are under the stronger GPL license -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1153733] Review Request: golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud - The Go SDK for Openstack http://gophercloud.io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153733 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud-1.0.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162103] Review Request: golang-github-dgnorton-goback - A simple non-database related transaction library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162103 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-dgnorton-goback-0-0.1.gita49ca3c.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-dgnorton-goback-0-0.1.gita49ca3c.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178684] Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178684 Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsyna...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: axmail Short Description: UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox Upstream URL: http://www.n1uro.net Owners: jskarvad Branches: f20 f21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121146] request ganeti for epel7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121146 --- Comment #4 from neal neal.oakey+redhatbugzi...@googlemail.com --- Hi, I wanted to ask if there are any updates on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178673] Please package ecryptfs-utils for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178673 neal neal.oakey+redhatbugzi...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||package-review@lists.fedora ||project.org Component|epel-release|Package Review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178684] New: Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178684 Bug ID: 1178684 Summary: Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rhug...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/gnome-multi-writer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/gnome-multi-writer-3.15.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8526535 Description: GNOME MultiWriter can be used to write an ISO file to multiple USB devices simultaneously. Fedora Account System Username: rhughes $ rpmlint SPECS/gnome-multi-writer.spec RPMS/gnome-multi-writer-* SRPMS/gnome-multi-writer-3.15.1-1.fc21.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178687] New: Review Request: python-glob2 - Glob module recursive wildcards support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178687 Bug ID: 1178687 Summary: Review Request: python-glob2 - Glob module recursive wildcards support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: juj...@jujens.eu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/python-glob2.spec SRPM URL: http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SRPMS/python-glob2-0.4.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Version of the glob module that can capture patterns and supports recursive wildcards. Fedora Account System Username: jujens -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176277] Review Request: Shinobi - Meta build system for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277
Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru ---
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/taurus/1176277-Shinobi/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean
[Bug 1178167] Review Request: golang-github-smashwilson-gophercloud - The Go SDK for Openstack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178167 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-01-05 06:07:16 --- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- Looking at files with github.com/smashwilson/gophercloud import, there are only two: gophercloud-1.0.0/acceptance/rackspace/compute/v2/bootfromvolume_test.go:12 gophercloud-1.0.0/acceptance/openstack/compute/v2/bootfromvolume_test.go:11 Both are used only for testing. Thus this dependency is optional. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176277] Review Request: Shinobi - Meta build system for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: Shinobi Short Description: Meta build system for Ninja Upstream URL: https://github.com/Rapptz/Shinobi Owners: raphgro Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178617] Review Request: aksharyogini2-fonts - Devanagari normal style font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178617
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
For font releases where there is no information about version clearly stated in
font file as well as on download URL, we should consider them as snapshot
Pre-release packages. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
So, Change the release tag line to following
Release: 0.1.20131101%{?dist}
Rest looks okay.
I see this is your first package and you will need sponsorship in packager
group. We have this process
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group to
get sponsored in packager group. Can you either submit few more packages and/or
some (3-5) full package reviews? This is needed to make sure package submitter
understands packaging well and follows as per fedora packaging guidelines.
Please go through links
1) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
2) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines
3) To find package already submitted for review check
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
4) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines
5) https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ this is fedora-review tool to help
review packages in fedora.
If you got any questions please ask :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553186] Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 Jiri Pirko j...@pirko.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@pirko.cz Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jiri Pirko j...@pirko.cz --- Package Change Request == Package Name: jansson New Branches: epel7 Owners: jirka kanarip jsmith -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178684] Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178684 Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com --- One problem is LGPLv2+ in header, but was fixed. # src/gmw-cleanup.h actually says LGPLv2+, but this is a mistake. Will fix for next tarball release -- rhughes No one problems spotted. Feel free add me as co-maintainer! APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141494] Review Request: python-flask-whooshalchemy - Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494
Robert Mayr robyd...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robyd...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Robert Mayr robyd...@gmail.com ---
This package seems quite good to me now, here is an unofficial review:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/robyduck/1141494-python-flask-
whooshalchemy/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-
packages/Flask_WhooshAlchemy-0.56-py3.4.egg-info, /usr/lib/python2.7
/site-packages/Flask_WhooshAlchemy-0.56-py2.7.egg-info
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/Flask_WhooshAlchemy-0.56-py2.7.egg-info, /usr/lib/python3.4
/site-packages/Flask_WhooshAlchemy-0.56-py3.4.egg-info
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
-flask-whooshalchemy
[x]:
[Bug 1178684] Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178684 Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-multi-writer Short Description: Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once Upstream URL: https://github.com/hughsie/gnome-multi-writer Owners: rhughes Branches: f21 InitialCC: rhughes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178617] Review Request: aksharyogini2-fonts - Devanagari normal style font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178617 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |AksharYogini2 |aksharyogini2-fonts - |-aksharyogini2 devanagari |Devanagari normal style |normal style font |font Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175306] Review Request: plasma-breeze - Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175306 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: breeze -|Review Request: |Artwork, styles and assets |plasma-breeze - Artwork, |for the Breeze visual style |styles and assets for the |for the Plasma Desktop |Breeze visual style for the ||Plasma Desktop Alias|breeze |plasma-breeze --- Comment #4 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- 1. Renamed back 2. Renamed 3. Created subpkg + added missing scriptlets 4. Fixed url 5. Fixed Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/plasma-breeze.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/plasma-breeze-5.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8527191 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1172719] Review Request: isl - Integer point manipulation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172719 --- Comment #3 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2) Further, isl.pc relinks with -lgmp, which is not necessary when linking shared. True, but it also shouldn't hurt. And isl.pc doesn't specify a pkgconfig dependency on gmp/gmp-devel, because that one does not include any pkgconfig file. I'm not sure what I can do about that without modifying the gmp package. -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/libisl.la These libtool archives are covered here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries That shouldn't be there - I have a line that supposedly removes that in the spec file and I don't see it when I build the RPMs. %install make install ... Use %makeinstall: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_. 25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used Why? Did you mean %make_install instead? Note that it doesn't seem like this should be necessary. Anyway, revised: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/isl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dhowells/isl-0.14-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175328] Review Request: powerdevil - Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175328 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: powerdevil Short Description: Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/powerdevil Owners: rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: kde-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175323] Review Request: plasma-systemsettings - KDE's System Settings application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175323 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jgrulich@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- 1. That's something I'm not sure with, having a package called just systemsettings in Fedora doesn't seem to be a good option. 2-5. Fixed Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/plasma-systemsettings.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/plasma-systemsettings-5.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8528049 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123402] Review Request: awscli - AWS Command Line Interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123402
--- Comment #14 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
The site where spec and src.rpm were hosed was not accessible during end of
december.
I think that the R: python-botocore 0.59.0 is incorrect, it prevents the
installation of awscli on rawhide and the current version of awscli does not
work with botocore 0.64.0 (it imports at least the parsers module which
doesn't exist before).
%{python2_sitelib}/%{name}/paramfile.py still have a shebang while it's not an
executable script (could be fixed upstream btw).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1119063] Review Request: python-service-identity - Service identity verification for pyOpenSSL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119063 Robert Mayr robyd...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robyd...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|robyd...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Robert Mayr robyd...@gmail.com --- The spec looks good to me, I will review it and hopefully approve once the dependencies python-idna and python-characteristic (both still in testing) are in stable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175299] Review Request: kf5-ksysguard - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299 --- Comment #2 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- naming: I guess libksysguard is going to be a framework, they even called the library KF5SysGuard so I would prefer to use kf5 prefix to avoid renaming it in future. 1-2. Fixed Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/kf5-ksysguard.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/kf5-ksysguard-5.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1109496] Review Request: mathex - C++ library to parse/evaluate mathematical expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109496 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 976049] Review Request: irclib - Java implementation of the IRC protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976049 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/irclib.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/irclib-1.10-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1109496] Review Request: mathex - C++ library to parse/evaluate mathematical expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109496 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175323] Review Request: plasma-systemsettings - KDE's System Settings application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175323 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- looks good, APPROVED p.s. make sure to update changelog too when updating pkgs for reviews -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176277] Review Request: Shinobi - Meta build system for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176277] Review Request: Shinobi - Meta build system for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 976049] Review Request: irclib - Java implementation of the IRC protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976049 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8528420 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1172719] Review Request: isl - Integer point manipulation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172719
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
[relinking with -lgmp]
True, but it also shouldn't hurt.
It can lead to extra rebuilds, e.g. you would need to rebuild anything that
links with -lisl, if only GMP bumped its SONAME. Being aware of that can be
helpful. Often the pkgconfig files are tailored for static linking.
I'm not sure what I can do about that without modifying the gmp package.
The added Requires: gmp-devel is almost the right fix. You really want
Requires: gpm-devel%{?_isa} to get the correct build-arch.
I have a line that supposedly removes that in the spec file and
I don't see it when I build the RPMs.
The added lines are the right fix. Note that rm -f would be better, because
unlike rm it would not make the build fail, if the file to be removed does
not exist. = You want to get rid of the file anyway, so if it doesn't exist
that's fine.
Did you mean %make_install instead?
Yes. The macro saves some typing, but it's not a MUST.
You've not fixed/removed the Group tag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108355] Review Request: tcl-togl - A Tk OpenGL widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108355 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tcl-togl-1.7-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-togl-1.7-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- axmail-2.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/axmail-2.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 589867] Review Request: logcheck - analyzes logfiles and sends email
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: logcheck New Branches: epel7 Owners: mrunge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553186] Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 Jan Včelák jv+fed...@fcelda.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo? --- Comment #14 from Jan Včelák jv+fed...@fcelda.cz --- I'm not sure if this was right. The package is already present in EPEL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL: EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux distributions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175299] Review Request: kf5-ksysguard - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299 --- Comment #4 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- Sorry, I forgot to change the URL. Correct SCM request below. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kf5-ksysguard Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/libksysguard Owners: rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: kde-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175299] Review Request: kf5-ksysguard - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299 --- Comment #3 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kf5-ksysguard Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/powerdevil Owners: rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: kde-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553186] Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553186] Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175306] Review Request: plasma-breeze - Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175306 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- looks good, APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177942] Review Request: marsshooter - M.A.R.S. - A Ridiculous Shooter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177942 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175299] Review Request: kf5-ksysguard - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299 --- Comment #5 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- One more time. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kf5-ksysguard Short Description: KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 addon for process management Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/libksysguard Owners: @kde-sig rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175328] Review Request: powerdevil - Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175328 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: powerdevil Short Description: Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/powerdevil Owners: @kde-sig rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175323] Review Request: plasma-systemsettings - KDE's System Settings application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175323 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: plasma-systemsettings Short Description: KDE's System Settings application Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/systemsettings Owners: @kde-sig rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108355] Review Request: tcl-togl - A Tk OpenGL widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108355 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tcl-togl-1.7-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-togl-1.7-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1109496] Review Request: mathex - C++ library to parse/evaluate mathematical expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109496 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mathex-0.3b-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mathex-0.3b-3.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #24 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- please ignore #c23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 601115] Review Request: lockfile-progs - safely lock and unlock files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115 Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC|opensou...@till.name| Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: lockfile-progs New Branches: epel7 Owners: mrunge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108355] Review Request: tcl-togl - A Tk OpenGL widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108355 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108355] Review Request: tcl-togl - A Tk OpenGL widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108355 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175328] Review Request: powerdevil - Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175328 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- WARNING: kde-sig is not a valid FAS account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175328] Review Request: powerdevil - Manages the power consumption settings of a Plasma Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175328 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1171553] Review Request: csvdiff - Generate a diff between two CSV files on the command-line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171553 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1171553] Review Request: csvdiff - Generate a diff between two CSV files on the command-line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171553 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177942] Review Request: marsshooter - M.A.R.S. - A Ridiculous Shooter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177942 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177926] Review Request: smuxi - Powerful, flexible, user-friendly chat client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177926] Review Request: smuxi - Powerful, flexible, user-friendly chat client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178684] Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178684 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-01-05 08:22:29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175306] Review Request: plasma-breeze - Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175306 Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: plasma-breeze Short Description: Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/breeze Owners: @kde-sig rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173683] Review Request: pg-semver - A semantic version data type for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683 Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rma...@redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: pg-semver - |postgresql-semver - A |A semantic version data |semantic version data type |type for PostgreSQL |for PostgreSQL | --- Comment #3 from Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com --- Thank you, fixed! Spec URL: https://rmarko.fedorapeople.org/packages/pg-semver.spec SRPM URL: https://rmarko.fedorapeople.org/packages/pg-semver-0.5.0-2.fc21.src.rpm Changes: https://rmarko.fedorapeople.org/packages/pg-semver.spec.diff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 716613] Review Request: gpaste - Clipboard management system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716613 Mohamed El Morabity pikachu.2...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+ fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1109496] Review Request: mathex - C++ library to parse/evaluate mathematical expressions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109496 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- mathex-0.3b-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mathex-0.3b-3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121115] Review Request: axmail - UROnode addon - an SMTP mailbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121115 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- axmail-2.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/axmail-2.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178673] Please package ecryptfs-utils for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178673 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||esand...@redhat.com, ||mhlav...@redhat.com Component|Package Review |ecryptfs-utils Version|epel7 |rawhide Product|Fedora EPEL |Fedora --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Moving to the fedora ecryptfs-utils package for comment from maintainers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 553186] Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 --- Comment #15 from Jan Včelák jv+fed...@fcelda.cz --- typo... The package is already present in RHEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178361] Review Request: stuntrally - Stunt Rally game with Track Editor, based on VDrift and OGRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178361
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
- You can improve building by using more cmake options. Run
'cmake -LAH' from main source directory.
Use CMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=YES too.
- DSHARE_INSTALL= is already defined in hte built-in RPM macro (see command
'rpm --eval %cmake'), but in this case must be re-defined with
DSHARE_INSTALL=%{_datadir}/%{name}.
- stuntrally requires stuntrally-data;
stuntrally-data requires stuntrally
It's a mutual dependency; i think you can keep only the first one.
- Why does stuntrally-static require stuntrally-devel?
- %{_prefix}/lib ???
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038274] Review Request: rubygem-liquid - A secure, non-evaling end user template engine with aesthetic markup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038274 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Would you update this? (also I would appreciate it if you have time to review bug 1175601) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1172719] Review Request: isl - Integer point manipulation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172719 --- Comment #5 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #4) [relinking with -lgmp] True, but it also shouldn't hurt. It can lead to extra rebuilds, e.g. you would need to rebuild anything that links with -lisl, if only GMP bumped its SONAME. Being aware of that can be helpful. Often the pkgconfig files are tailored for static linking. Some of the isl macros are just wrappers around the gmp function calls in the header - in that case, shouldn't -lgmp also be passed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162091] Review Request: golang-github-rakyll-statik - Embed static files into a Go executable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162091 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- -License correct -Spec file conforms to current golang packaging draft. Only sources installed for now. Package approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162106] Review Request: golang-github-kimor79-gollectd - A go parser for the collectd binary protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162106 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- -License is correct -Spec file conforms to current golang package draft. Only sources installed for now. Package approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
