subject:"\[PacketFence\-users\] Registration dhco"

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-29 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi,

Please someone help me, I already did everything that is described in the
manual, but still without inter-vlan communication, as you can see I have
configured the networks with default gateway and next-hop, but it does not
work.
Thanks
Regards

A terça, 20/08/2019, 17:56, Domingos Varela 
escreveu:

> Nicolas,
>
> my pf vm is connected on a router switch to the core switch that connects
> cisco wlc in L2.
>
> Registration Isolation
> Vlan ID 220 221
> Network 10.6.220.0/24 10.6.230.0/24
> Gateway 10.6.220.1 10.6.230.1
> DHCP 10.7.7.241 10.7.7.241
> DNS 10.7.7.241
> 10.7.7.241
> PF 10.7.7.241 10.7.7.241
>
>
>
> #/conf/pf.conf
>
> [interface eth0]
> ip=10.7.74.241
> type=management,portal
> mask=255.255.255.0
>
> [interface eth1.220]
> enforcement=vlan
> ip=10.6.222.5
> type=internal
> mask=255.255.255.0
>
> [interface eth1.221]
> enforcement=vlan
> ip=10.6.223.5
> type=internal
> mask=255.255.255.0
>
>
> #/conf/networks.conf
>
> [10.6.222.0]
> dns=10.6.222.5
> split_network=disabled
> dhcp_start=10.6.222.10
> gateway=10.6.222.1
> next_hop=10.6.224.1
> domain-name=vlan-isolation.domain.com
> nat_enabled=disabled
> named=enabled
> dhcp_max_lease_time=30
> fake_mac_enabled=disabled
> dhcpd=enabled
> dhcp_end=10.6.222.246
> type=vlan-registration
> netmask=255.255.255.0
> dhcp_default_lease_time=30
>
> [10.6.223.0]
> dns=10.6.223.5
> split_network=disabled
> dhcp_start=10.6.223.10
> gateway=10.6.223.1
> next_hop=10.6.223.1
> domain-name=vlan-isolation.domain.com
> nat_enabled=disabled
> named=enabled
> dhcp_max_lease_time=30
> fake_mac_enabled=disabled
> dhcpd=enabled
> dhcp_end=10.6.223.246
> type=vlan-isolation
> netmask=255.255.255.0
> dhcp_default_lease_time=30
>
> # route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0 10.7.74.1   0.0.0.0 UG0  00
> eth0
> 10.6.222.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
> eth1.220
> 10.6.223.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
> eth1.221
> 10.7.74.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
> eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0  00
> domain-b
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002   00
> eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003   00
> eth1
>
>
> A terça, 20/08/2019, 16:13, Domingos Varela 
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The answer below
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> A terça, 20/08/2019, 14:58, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users <
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> 1. If I correctly understand you, you try to make a setup with routed
>>> networks [0] ?
>>>
>> Yes, the vm is in a routed subnet
>>
>>>
>>> 2. Before trying to configure routed networks, are you able to register
>>> a device in the registration VLAN ?
>>>
>> No, the clients get the data vlan
>>
>>>
>>> [0]
>>>
>>> https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_routed_networks
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
>>> n...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  https://inverse.ca
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
>>> (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-20 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Nicolas,

my pf vm is connected on a router switch to the core switch that connects
cisco wlc in L2.

Registration Isolation
Vlan ID 220 221
Network 10.6.220.0/24 10.6.230.0/24
Gateway 10.6.220.1 10.6.230.1
DHCP 10.7.7.241 10.7.7.241
DNS 10.7.7.241
10.7.7.241
PF 10.7.7.241 10.7.7.241



#/conf/pf.conf

[interface eth0]
ip=10.7.74.241
type=management,portal
mask=255.255.255.0

[interface eth1.220]
enforcement=vlan
ip=10.6.222.5
type=internal
mask=255.255.255.0

[interface eth1.221]
enforcement=vlan
ip=10.6.223.5
type=internal
mask=255.255.255.0


#/conf/networks.conf

[10.6.222.0]
dns=10.6.222.5
split_network=disabled
dhcp_start=10.6.222.10
gateway=10.6.222.1
next_hop=10.6.224.1
domain-name=vlan-isolation.domain.com
nat_enabled=disabled
named=enabled
dhcp_max_lease_time=30
fake_mac_enabled=disabled
dhcpd=enabled
dhcp_end=10.6.222.246
type=vlan-registration
netmask=255.255.255.0
dhcp_default_lease_time=30

[10.6.223.0]
dns=10.6.223.5
split_network=disabled
dhcp_start=10.6.223.10
gateway=10.6.223.1
next_hop=10.6.223.1
domain-name=vlan-isolation.domain.com
nat_enabled=disabled
named=enabled
dhcp_max_lease_time=30
fake_mac_enabled=disabled
dhcpd=enabled
dhcp_end=10.6.223.246
type=vlan-isolation
netmask=255.255.255.0
dhcp_default_lease_time=30

# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 10.7.74.1   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0
10.6.222.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eth1.220
10.6.223.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eth1.221
10.7.74.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0  00
domain-b
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002   00 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003   00 eth1


A terça, 20/08/2019, 16:13, Domingos Varela 
escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> The answer below
> Thanks
>
>
> A terça, 20/08/2019, 14:58, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users <
> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 1. If I correctly understand you, you try to make a setup with routed
>> networks [0] ?
>>
> Yes, the vm is in a routed subnet
>
>>
>> 2. Before trying to configure routed networks, are you able to register
>> a device in the registration VLAN ?
>>
> No, the clients get the data vlan
>
>>
>> [0]
>>
>> https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_routed_networks
>> --
>> Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
>> n...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  https://inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
>> (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
>>
>>
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-20 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi,

The answer below
Thanks


A terça, 20/08/2019, 14:58, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users <
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu:

> Hello,
>
> 1. If I correctly understand you, you try to make a setup with routed
> networks [0] ?
>
Yes, the vm is in a routed subnet

>
> 2. Before trying to configure routed networks, are you able to register
> a device in the registration VLAN ?
>
No, the clients get the data vlan

>
> [0]
>
> https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_routed_networks
> --
> Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
> n...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  https://inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
> (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
>
>
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-20 Thread Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users


Hello,

1. If I correctly understand you, you try to make a setup with routed 
networks [0] ?


2. Before trying to configure routed networks, are you able to register 
a device in the registration VLAN ?


[0] 
https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Installation_Guide.html#_routed_networks

--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *140  ::  https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence 
(https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)



___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-20 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi,

Please, can someone who has the registration subnet working help?
Thanks

A segunda, 12/08/2019, 17:34, Domingos Varela 
escreveu:

> Hi Fabrice,
>
> I am using the first option, but I am having problems in the pf gateway,
> because I can access the network registration only by the same subnet if
> trying for another no longer respond ... below the configuration of pf.
>
> #SWITCH
>
> Vlan 220
>
> interface Vlan220
>  description Registration
>  ip address 192.168.220.1 255.255.255.0
>  ip helper-address 192.168.220.6
>
>
> #PF
>
> [interface eth1.220]
> enforcement=vlan
> ip=192.168.220.6
> type=internal
> mask=255.255.255.0
> gateway=192.168.220.1
>
> [192.168.220.0]
> dns=192.168.220.6
> split_network=disabled
> dhcp_start=192.168.220.10
> gateway=192.168.220.1
> domain-name=vlan-registration.sonangol.pvt
> nat_enabled=disabled
> named=enabled
> dhcp_max_lease_time=30
> fake_mac_enabled=disabled
> dhcpd=enabled
> dhcp_end=192.168.220.246
> type=vlan-registration
> netmask=255.255.255.0
> dhcp_default_lease_time=30
>
>
> A segunda, 12/08/2019, 13:44, Fabrice Durand 
> escreveu:
>
>> Hello Domingos,
>>
>> really sorry for the delay.
>>
>> So yes the registration and isolation vlan need to be available in all
>> your switches like a normal vlan. (layer 2)
>>
>> The only difference is that this vlan is managed by packetfence, so pf is
>> the dhcp/dns/default gateway.
>>
>> So let's say the reg vlan is 123 then you don't have to set a gateway on
>> this vlan.
>>
>>
>> Now let's say you want to route the registration vlan and isolation vlan.
>>
>> You have 2 ways to do it, the first one is to have a gateway in the vlan
>> 123 and tell packetfence to use this gateway to reach the remote
>> registration vlan and in the client gateway (on the other side) you need to
>> set an ip-helper address to the registration interface ip of packetfence.
>>
>> Or you can use the management interface as a dhcp, to do that just add an
>> additional daemon to the management interface (dhcp) and create a remote
>> registration config that use the gateway facing the management interface.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>> Le 19-08-09 à 12 h 03, Domingos Varela a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Fabrice,
>>
>> I agree with you that it is a network problem, because the production
>> network does not have access to the registration network.
>>
>> Should registration and isolation networks be routed or not in the
>> infrastructure?
>>
>> If not, how do clients get to the dhcp server if they don't have access
>> to the gateway of these networks?
>>
>> Is it possible to change the dhcp listen port to the management address?
>> Thanks
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> A quarta, 7/08/2019, 16:44, Domingos Varela 
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Pf logs in attach
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>   pf-logs.7z
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A quarta, 7/08/2019, 15:41, Fabrice Durand 
>>> escreveu:
>>>
 Hello Domingas,

 the packetfence.log should be enough.

 Regards

 Fabrice


 Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :

 Hi Patrice,

 Which equipment do you want the logs from?
 For more details I send the implementation diagram.
 Thanks
 Regards

 Cumprimentos,

 * Domingos Varela*
 Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola


 Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
 packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu no dia terça,
 6/08/2019 à(s) 20:27:

> Hello Domingos,
>
> if the device receive an ip address from the production vlan then it
> mean that there is a network miss-configuration.
>
> Can you provide some logs ?
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when a
> user connects to the network he gets the IP from the data network and not
> from the registration network.
>
> Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and after
> logging in receive the io from the data network?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
>
>
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing 
> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> --
> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
> www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
 --
 Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-12 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi Fabrice,

I am using the first option, but I am having problems in the pf gateway,
because I can access the network registration only by the same subnet if
trying for another no longer respond ... below the configuration of pf.

#SWITCH

Vlan 220

interface Vlan220
 description Registration
 ip address 192.168.220.1 255.255.255.0
 ip helper-address 192.168.220.6


#PF

[interface eth1.220]
enforcement=vlan
ip=192.168.220.6
type=internal
mask=255.255.255.0
gateway=192.168.220.1

[192.168.220.0]
dns=192.168.220.6
split_network=disabled
dhcp_start=192.168.220.10
gateway=192.168.220.1
domain-name=vlan-registration.sonangol.pvt
nat_enabled=disabled
named=enabled
dhcp_max_lease_time=30
fake_mac_enabled=disabled
dhcpd=enabled
dhcp_end=192.168.220.246
type=vlan-registration
netmask=255.255.255.0
dhcp_default_lease_time=30


A segunda, 12/08/2019, 13:44, Fabrice Durand  escreveu:

> Hello Domingos,
>
> really sorry for the delay.
>
> So yes the registration and isolation vlan need to be available in all
> your switches like a normal vlan. (layer 2)
>
> The only difference is that this vlan is managed by packetfence, so pf is
> the dhcp/dns/default gateway.
>
> So let's say the reg vlan is 123 then you don't have to set a gateway on
> this vlan.
>
>
> Now let's say you want to route the registration vlan and isolation vlan.
>
> You have 2 ways to do it, the first one is to have a gateway in the vlan
> 123 and tell packetfence to use this gateway to reach the remote
> registration vlan and in the client gateway (on the other side) you need to
> set an ip-helper address to the registration interface ip of packetfence.
>
> Or you can use the management interface as a dhcp, to do that just add an
> additional daemon to the management interface (dhcp) and create a remote
> registration config that use the gateway facing the management interface.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 19-08-09 à 12 h 03, Domingos Varela a écrit :
>
> Hi Fabrice,
>
> I agree with you that it is a network problem, because the production
> network does not have access to the registration network.
>
> Should registration and isolation networks be routed or not in the
> infrastructure?
>
> If not, how do clients get to the dhcp server if they don't have access to
> the gateway of these networks?
>
> Is it possible to change the dhcp listen port to the management address?
> Thanks
>
> Regards
>
>
> A quarta, 7/08/2019, 16:44, Domingos Varela 
> escreveu:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Pf logs in attach
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>   pf-logs.7z
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> A quarta, 7/08/2019, 15:41, Fabrice Durand  escreveu:
>>
>>> Hello Domingas,
>>>
>>> the packetfence.log should be enough.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Patrice,
>>>
>>> Which equipment do you want the logs from?
>>> For more details I send the implementation diagram.
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Cumprimentos,
>>>
>>> * Domingos Varela*
>>> Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola
>>>
>>>
>>> Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu no dia terça,
>>> 6/08/2019 à(s) 20:27:
>>>
 Hello Domingos,

 if the device receive an ip address from the production vlan then it
 mean that there is a network miss-configuration.

 Can you provide some logs ?

 Regards

 Fabrice


 Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users a écrit :

 Hi,

 I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when a
 user connects to the network he gets the IP from the data network and not
 from the registration network.

 Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and after
 logging in receive the io from the data network?

 Thanks
 Regards


 ___
 PacketFence-users mailing 
 listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

 --
 Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
 www.inverse.ca
 Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
 (http://packetfence.org)

 ___
 PacketFence-users mailing list
 PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

>>> --
>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>> www.inverse.ca
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>
>>> --
> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
>

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-12 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users


Hello Domingos,

really sorry for the delay.

So yes the registration and isolation vlan need to be available in all 
your switches like a normal vlan. (layer 2)


The only difference is that this vlan is managed by packetfence, so pf 
is the dhcp/dns/default gateway.


So let's say the reg vlan is 123 then you don't have to set a gateway on 
this vlan.



Now let's say you want to route the registration vlan and isolation vlan.

You have 2 ways to do it, the first one is to have a gateway in the vlan 
123 and tell packetfence to use this gateway to reach the remote 
registration vlan and in the client gateway (on the other side) you need 
to set an ip-helper address to the registration interface ip of packetfence.


Or you can use the management interface as a dhcp, to do that just add 
an additional daemon to the management interface (dhcp) and create a 
remote registration config that use the gateway facing the management 
interface.


Regards

Fabrice


Le 19-08-09 à 12 h 03, Domingos Varela a écrit :

Hi Fabrice,

I agree with you that it is a network problem, because the production 
network does not have access to the registration network.


Should registration and isolation networks be routed or not in the 
infrastructure?


If not, how do clients get to the dhcp server if they don't have 
access to the gateway of these networks?


Is it possible to change the dhcp listen port to the management address?
Thanks

Regards


A quarta, 7/08/2019, 16:44, Domingos Varela > escreveu:


Hi,

Pf logs in attach

Thanks

pf-logs.7z







A quarta, 7/08/2019, 15:41, Fabrice Durand mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca>> escreveu:

Hello Domingas,

the packetfence.log should be enough.

Regards

Fabrice


Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :

Hi Patrice,

Which equipment do you want the logs from?
For more details I send the implementation diagram.
Thanks
Regards

Cumprimentos,*

Domingos Varela*
Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola


Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net>> escreveu no
dia terça, 6/08/2019 à(s) 20:27:

Hello Domingos,

if the device receive an ip address from the production
vlan then it mean that there is a network miss-configuration.

Can you provide some logs ?

Regards

Fabrice


Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via
PacketFence-users a écrit :

Hi,

I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network,
but when a user connects to the network he gets the IP
from the data network and not from the registration
network.

Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration
network and after logging in receive the io from the
data network?

Thanks
Regards


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


-- 
Fabrice Durand

fdur...@inverse.ca    ::  +1.514.447.4918 
(x135) ::www.inverse.ca  
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)

___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-- 
Fabrice Durand

fdur...@inverse.ca    ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
::www.inverse.ca  
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)


--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-09 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi Fabrice,

I agree with you that it is a network problem, because the production
network does not have access to the registration network.

Should registration and isolation networks be routed or not in the
infrastructure?

If not, how do clients get to the dhcp server if they don't have access to
the gateway of these networks?

Is it possible to change the dhcp listen port to the management address?
Thanks

Regards


A quarta, 7/08/2019, 16:44, Domingos Varela 
escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> Pf logs in attach
>
> Thanks
>
>   pf-logs.7z
> 
>
>
>
>
> A quarta, 7/08/2019, 15:41, Fabrice Durand  escreveu:
>
>> Hello Domingas,
>>
>> the packetfence.log should be enough.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>> Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Patrice,
>>
>> Which equipment do you want the logs from?
>> For more details I send the implementation diagram.
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>>
>> Cumprimentos,
>>
>> * Domingos Varela*
>> Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola
>>
>>
>> Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
>> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu no dia terça,
>> 6/08/2019 à(s) 20:27:
>>
>>> Hello Domingos,
>>>
>>> if the device receive an ip address from the production vlan then it
>>> mean that there is a network miss-configuration.
>>>
>>> Can you provide some logs ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when a user
>>> connects to the network he gets the IP from the data network and not from
>>> the registration network.
>>>
>>> Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and after
>>> logging in receive the io from the data network?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>>> www.inverse.ca
>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>>
>>> ___
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>
>> --
>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>> www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>>
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-08 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi,

Pf logs in attach

Thanks

  pf-logs.7z





A quarta, 7/08/2019, 15:41, Fabrice Durand  escreveu:

> Hello Domingas,
>
> the packetfence.log should be enough.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabrice
>
>
> Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :
>
> Hi Patrice,
>
> Which equipment do you want the logs from?
> For more details I send the implementation diagram.
> Thanks
> Regards
>
> Cumprimentos,
>
> * Domingos Varela*
> Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola
>
>
> Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users <
> packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> escreveu no dia terça, 6/08/2019
> à(s) 20:27:
>
>> Hello Domingos,
>>
>> if the device receive an ip address from the production vlan then it mean
>> that there is a network miss-configuration.
>>
>> Can you provide some logs ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Fabrice
>>
>>
>> Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when a user
>> connects to the network he gets the IP from the data network and not from
>> the registration network.
>>
>> Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and after
>> logging in receive the io from the data network?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing 
>> listPacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
>> --
>> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
>> www.inverse.ca
>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
>> (http://packetfence.org)
>>
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>
> --
> Fabrice durandfdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
> (http://packetfence.org)
>
>
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-07 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users


Hello Domingas,

the packetfence.log should be enough.

Regards

Fabrice


Le 19-08-06 à 17 h 01, Domingos Varela a écrit :

Hi Patrice,

Which equipment do you want the logs from?
For more details I send the implementation diagram.
Thanks
Regards

Cumprimentos,*

Domingos Varela*
Tel. +244 923 229 330 | Luanda - Angola


Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users 
> escreveu no dia 
terça, 6/08/2019 à(s) 20:27:


Hello Domingos,

if the device receive an ip address from the production vlan then
it mean that there is a network miss-configuration.

Can you provide some logs ?

Regards

Fabrice


Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users a écrit :

Hi,

I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when
a user connects to the network he gets the IP from the data
network and not from the registration network.

Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and
after logging in receive the io from the data network?

Thanks
Regards


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net  

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


-- 
Fabrice Durand

fdur...@inverse.ca    ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) 
::www.inverse.ca  
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-06 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users


Hello Domingos,

if the device receive an ip address from the production vlan then it 
mean that there is a network miss-configuration.


Can you provide some logs ?

Regards

Fabrice


Le 19-08-05 à 10 h 17, Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users a écrit :

Hi,

I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when a 
user connects to the network he gets the IP from the data network and 
not from the registration network.


Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and after 
logging in receive the io from the data network?


Thanks
Regards


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

2019-08-05 Thread Domingos Varela via PacketFence-users

Hi,

I am using pf to authenticate wifi users on the network, but when a user
connects to the network he gets the IP from the data network and not from
the registration network.

Shouldn't users receive the IP from the registration network and after
logging in receive the io from the data network?

Thanks
Regards
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

Re: [PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

[PacketFence-users] Registration dhco

12 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information