Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-07 Thread Kelly Pierce
A few years ago, similar performance to the 4770 or 4790 chips could
only be obtained with a computer with a liquid cooling system as the
chips ran so hot.  Let’s hope the next generation of high performance
chips after Haswell does not require liquid cooling.

Kelly




On 7/6/14, Brent Harding br...@hostany.net wrote:
 I thought I heard awhile now that they hit a plateau where they can't get
 higher ghz ratings without significantly more heat being generated. I wonder

 if they will go to something like quad, 6, and 8 core ones, which probably
 means you can do more things at a time without it seeming to slow down.

 - Original Message -
 From: Brian Olesen br...@blindkom.dk
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 3:34 AM
 Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?


 Hi,
 wow Really great story! Thanks.
 The fourth generation I7 CPUs mostly focus on the graphics part and in
 other terms only gains 7 % more performance over the third generation. So

 it doesn't really matter weather you have a 3. generation chip or not
 especially if you're using a deticated graphics card.
 I don't know the specs for the fifth generation, but I expect it to be
 cool!
 I've always been a fan of Intel since the 8086. grin

 Regarding Windows. Hmm I'm very satesfied with Windows 7 even though I'm
 running windows 8.1 on afew of my machines. It's not that I don't like
 windows 8. It's more that I don't feel I get much interesting new stuff
 from it.

 best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 From: Kelly Pierce
 Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 4:18 AM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

 Hamit,

 The Dell XPS 8700 purchase was two years in the making. I had a
 Pentium 4 computer that I bought in 2004 running Windows XP. I was
 unimpressed with Windows 7 when it was released in 2009 and soon heard
 about new technology that would be the next generation of innovation
 in personal computers. Specifically, this included USB 3, flash hard
 drives, and faster processors from Intel. In September 2011, my
 computer stopped working. Thank god for external backup drives. I
 decided to wait until the upcoming windows 8 so I could have a
 computer with the latest technology.  I bought a used HP D530C from
 Chicago Surplus Computer for $85 to tide me over until the next
 generation of computing arrived. As we all know, the initial windows 8
 rollout was a disaster, particularly for the screen reader user.  The
 interface was too futuristic for most. Microsoft regrouped and
 delivered the vastly improved Windows 8.1 last fall.

 To my delight, Intel opened a store here in Chicago in late November
 to display products from its vendors and inform the public about its
 processors. I learned there how a computer choice starts with the chip
 and learned about the fastest chip for desktop computers. I searched
 around and found that a local outlet of a computer superstore chain
 was selling a customized version of the Dell 8700. The computer had a
 256 GB solid-state drive along with a 2 Tb regular rotating hard
 drive, loads of USB 3.0 jacks, 24 GB of RAM along with the fast Intel
 4770 chip. It was everything I wanted and much more. I raced to the
 store on December 26 with a bad cold to snatch it before it was bought
 by someone else.

 Now, the Intel 4770 is no longer the fastest. It has been surpassed by
 the 4790, an incremental upgrade. The next big boost in performance
 will be with the next generation of Intel processors that will be
 released either later this year or in the first half of next year.
 When this new generation of processors is combined with Windows 9, we
 can enjoy the next generation of desktop computing. We are now in a
 transition period between the Haswell processors and Windows 8.1 to
 the new generation of Intel processors and Windows 9. If you can wait
 until next year, you will likely be pleased at the performance you can
 obtain for the money.

 The Roland Duo Capture audio interface can be bought at a number of
 outlets that sell professional audio equipment. I believe I have the
 model before the current shipping version. Mine cannot support
 recording from an iPhone or iPad while the current shipping version
 can.  The eBay offering sold for a more than 80 percent discount than
 the current shipping version.  The drivers for it though support
 Windows 8.1.

 If I were to pay full price, I would actually purchase the Roland Quad
 Capture audio interface. It is just $70 more than the full retail
 price of the Roland Duo Capture and has a few more worthwhile
 features. It has a maximum capacity of 192,000 samples for recording.
 The Duo Capture’s upper limit is 44,100 samples. Both support 24-bit
 audio though. Useful functionality for the blind computer user is the
 Auto-Sens function that intelligently sets optimal input levels for
 both of the unit’s pre-amps. Roland Quad Capture is the audio
 interface

Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-06 Thread Brian Olesen

Hi,
wow Really great story! Thanks.
The fourth generation I7 CPUs mostly focus on the graphics part and in other 
terms only gains 7 % more performance over the third generation. So it 
doesn't really matter weather you have a 3. generation chip or not 
especially if you're using a deticated graphics card.

I don't know the specs for the fifth generation, but I expect it to be cool!
I've always been a fan of Intel since the 8086. grin

Regarding Windows. Hmm I'm very satesfied with Windows 7 even though I'm 
running windows 8.1 on afew of my machines. It's not that I don't like 
windows 8. It's more that I don't feel I get much interesting new stuff from 
it.


best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- 
From: Kelly Pierce

Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 4:18 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hamit,

The Dell XPS 8700 purchase was two years in the making. I had a
Pentium 4 computer that I bought in 2004 running Windows XP. I was
unimpressed with Windows 7 when it was released in 2009 and soon heard
about new technology that would be the next generation of innovation
in personal computers. Specifically, this included USB 3, flash hard
drives, and faster processors from Intel. In September 2011, my
computer stopped working. Thank god for external backup drives. I
decided to wait until the upcoming windows 8 so I could have a
computer with the latest technology.  I bought a used HP D530C from
Chicago Surplus Computer for $85 to tide me over until the next
generation of computing arrived. As we all know, the initial windows 8
rollout was a disaster, particularly for the screen reader user.  The
interface was too futuristic for most. Microsoft regrouped and
delivered the vastly improved Windows 8.1 last fall.

To my delight, Intel opened a store here in Chicago in late November
to display products from its vendors and inform the public about its
processors. I learned there how a computer choice starts with the chip
and learned about the fastest chip for desktop computers. I searched
around and found that a local outlet of a computer superstore chain
was selling a customized version of the Dell 8700. The computer had a
256 GB solid-state drive along with a 2 Tb regular rotating hard
drive, loads of USB 3.0 jacks, 24 GB of RAM along with the fast Intel
4770 chip. It was everything I wanted and much more. I raced to the
store on December 26 with a bad cold to snatch it before it was bought
by someone else.

Now, the Intel 4770 is no longer the fastest. It has been surpassed by
the 4790, an incremental upgrade. The next big boost in performance
will be with the next generation of Intel processors that will be
released either later this year or in the first half of next year.
When this new generation of processors is combined with Windows 9, we
can enjoy the next generation of desktop computing. We are now in a
transition period between the Haswell processors and Windows 8.1 to
the new generation of Intel processors and Windows 9. If you can wait
until next year, you will likely be pleased at the performance you can
obtain for the money.

The Roland Duo Capture audio interface can be bought at a number of
outlets that sell professional audio equipment. I believe I have the
model before the current shipping version. Mine cannot support
recording from an iPhone or iPad while the current shipping version
can.  The eBay offering sold for a more than 80 percent discount than
the current shipping version.  The drivers for it though support
Windows 8.1.

If I were to pay full price, I would actually purchase the Roland Quad
Capture audio interface. It is just $70 more than the full retail
price of the Roland Duo Capture and has a few more worthwhile
features. It has a maximum capacity of 192,000 samples for recording.
The Duo Capture’s upper limit is 44,100 samples. Both support 24-bit
audio though. Useful functionality for the blind computer user is the
Auto-Sens function that intelligently sets optimal input levels for
both of the unit’s pre-amps. Roland Quad Capture is the audio
interface personally used by Bill McCann, the founder and President of
Dancing Dots, on his machines.  When I spoke with Bill earlier this
year about the two audio interfaces, it seemed I was more impressed
with the Auto-Sens functionality than he was. Yet, how could I
disagree with the wise master, who has set his own levels on audio
devices for decades, for his exquisite audio choice given that he
handles and listens to these devices every day.

Talk to you later.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com wrote:

Petro,

A driver needs to be installed on the computer each time it is plugged
into a USB jack. This likely would be once for a home-based computer.
The installer for the driver has one button that cannot be recognized
by JAWS in Windows 8.1. It took a sighted person less than 30 seconds
to find the button on the screen and activate it with the mouse
though.  Once

Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-06 Thread Brent Harding
I thought I heard awhile now that they hit a plateau where they can't get 
higher ghz ratings without significantly more heat being generated. I wonder 
if they will go to something like quad, 6, and 8 core ones, which probably 
means you can do more things at a time without it seeming to slow down.


- Original Message - 
From: Brian Olesen br...@blindkom.dk

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?



Hi,
wow Really great story! Thanks.
The fourth generation I7 CPUs mostly focus on the graphics part and in 
other terms only gains 7 % more performance over the third generation. So 
it doesn't really matter weather you have a 3. generation chip or not 
especially if you're using a deticated graphics card.
I don't know the specs for the fifth generation, but I expect it to be 
cool!

I've always been a fan of Intel since the 8086. grin

Regarding Windows. Hmm I'm very satesfied with Windows 7 even though I'm 
running windows 8.1 on afew of my machines. It's not that I don't like 
windows 8. It's more that I don't feel I get much interesting new stuff 
from it.


best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- 
From: Kelly Pierce

Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 4:18 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hamit,

The Dell XPS 8700 purchase was two years in the making. I had a
Pentium 4 computer that I bought in 2004 running Windows XP. I was
unimpressed with Windows 7 when it was released in 2009 and soon heard
about new technology that would be the next generation of innovation
in personal computers. Specifically, this included USB 3, flash hard
drives, and faster processors from Intel. In September 2011, my
computer stopped working. Thank god for external backup drives. I
decided to wait until the upcoming windows 8 so I could have a
computer with the latest technology.  I bought a used HP D530C from
Chicago Surplus Computer for $85 to tide me over until the next
generation of computing arrived. As we all know, the initial windows 8
rollout was a disaster, particularly for the screen reader user.  The
interface was too futuristic for most. Microsoft regrouped and
delivered the vastly improved Windows 8.1 last fall.

To my delight, Intel opened a store here in Chicago in late November
to display products from its vendors and inform the public about its
processors. I learned there how a computer choice starts with the chip
and learned about the fastest chip for desktop computers. I searched
around and found that a local outlet of a computer superstore chain
was selling a customized version of the Dell 8700. The computer had a
256 GB solid-state drive along with a 2 Tb regular rotating hard
drive, loads of USB 3.0 jacks, 24 GB of RAM along with the fast Intel
4770 chip. It was everything I wanted and much more. I raced to the
store on December 26 with a bad cold to snatch it before it was bought
by someone else.

Now, the Intel 4770 is no longer the fastest. It has been surpassed by
the 4790, an incremental upgrade. The next big boost in performance
will be with the next generation of Intel processors that will be
released either later this year or in the first half of next year.
When this new generation of processors is combined with Windows 9, we
can enjoy the next generation of desktop computing. We are now in a
transition period between the Haswell processors and Windows 8.1 to
the new generation of Intel processors and Windows 9. If you can wait
until next year, you will likely be pleased at the performance you can
obtain for the money.

The Roland Duo Capture audio interface can be bought at a number of
outlets that sell professional audio equipment. I believe I have the
model before the current shipping version. Mine cannot support
recording from an iPhone or iPad while the current shipping version
can.  The eBay offering sold for a more than 80 percent discount than
the current shipping version.  The drivers for it though support
Windows 8.1.

If I were to pay full price, I would actually purchase the Roland Quad
Capture audio interface. It is just $70 more than the full retail
price of the Roland Duo Capture and has a few more worthwhile
features. It has a maximum capacity of 192,000 samples for recording.
The Duo Capture’s upper limit is 44,100 samples. Both support 24-bit
audio though. Useful functionality for the blind computer user is the
Auto-Sens function that intelligently sets optimal input levels for
both of the unit’s pre-amps. Roland Quad Capture is the audio
interface personally used by Bill McCann, the founder and President of
Dancing Dots, on his machines.  When I spoke with Bill earlier this
year about the two audio interfaces, it seemed I was more impressed
with the Auto-Sens functionality than he was. Yet, how could I
disagree with the wise master, who has set his own levels on audio
devices for decades, for his exquisite audio choice given that he

RE: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Robert Nelson

Steve,

Motherboard sound chips will handle basic audio adequately but even though
they may claim HD or high def audio, they are still mass produced to a
price.

I suggest that you go to 
www.techbuy.com.au 
and do a search for  Asus XONAR  (that's spelled X O N A R).  

Asus has a variety of sound cards  and one of them should meet your needs.
The DG and D2 cards are worth a look.

You should also do a search for Creative sound card.

Creative still makes a wide variety of sound cards and, indeed, looking at
them, one can't help wondering if some of them are not the one card with
different labels attached to them.

Also make sure you know what slot on the motherboard you are going to be
using, that is to say, PCI or PCI Express.  Note also that some of the cards
are low profile cards intended for half height back plane slots on small
form factor PCs.

Bob Nelson


-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Pattison
Sent: Saturday, 5 July 2014 10:29 AM
To: PC Audio
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in 
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts 
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we 
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is 
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years 
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC 
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I 
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the 
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited 
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I 
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound 
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.




Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Peter Scanlon

Do you want one sound card for window Eyes and another for other audio?



-Original Message- 
From: Steve Pattison 
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 10:29 AM 
To: PC Audio 
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate? 


Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in 
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts 
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we 
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is 
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years 
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.


I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC 
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I 
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the 
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited 
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.


I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I 
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound 
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.


Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.



Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Brian Olesen

Hi Steve,
The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most use. But 
when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good sound you'd still 
need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which sounds 
amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card of my laptop 
for everyday use.


Best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- 
From: Steve Pattison

Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
To: PC Audio
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve. 





Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Sunshine

how much does the sound card you use cost ?

On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:

Hi Steve,
The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most 
use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good 
sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which 
sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card 
of my laptop for everyday use.


Best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
To: PC Audio
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.










Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Brian Olesen

Hi,
About $ 700

Best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- 
From: Sunshine 
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 10:15 AM 
To: PC Audio Discussion List 
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate? 


how much does the sound card you use cost ?

On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:

Hi Steve,
The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most 
use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good 
sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which 
sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card 
of my laptop for everyday use.


Best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
To: PC Audio
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.










Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Sunshine

can you give us a sample of this cards sound quality?
On 7/5/2014 4:16 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:

Hi,
About $ 700

Best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Sunshine Sent: Saturday, July 
05, 2014 10:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Is 
Integrated Sound Adequate?

how much does the sound card you use cost ?

On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:

Hi Steve,
The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most 
use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good 
sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which 
sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card 
of my laptop for everyday use.


Best regards
Brian

-Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
To: PC Audio
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.

















Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Kelly Pierce
Steve,

It all depends on the kind of system you have and the fussiness of
your ears. At the end of last year, I bought a Dell 8700 computer with
the Intel i7 4770 processor, the fastest chip on the market at the
time. It had built-in HD audio. When the Dell pre-amp was configured,
the audio sounded as good as the M-Audio 24/96 sound card I bought 10
years ago with the highly regarded Casio drivers. The computer came
with separate jacks for a quadrophonic speaker setup as well as 5.1
audio in addition to the regular jacks for traditional stereo, line in
and microphones.  Computers with less sophisticated microprocessors
may not have as many options or HD audio.

That said, I want one sound card for the screen reader and one sound
card for audio playback and recording. To that end, I bought a Roland
Duo USB audio interface for $37 on eBay. It normally retails for $200.
Dancing Dots recommends this audio interface to its customers using
Windows computers. The company is the leader in accessible music and
audio production by the blind. The audio from the Roland interface
sounds real and lifelike and instruments are more distinct than the
integrated sound card. This should be no surprise as the audio is
processed outside the machine in a different cycle from the computer.
Try as they do, Intel and Dell cannot deliver in a mass-market product
the quality that audio focused companies have been doing for years. If
you just listen to spoken word audio and popular music, the integrated
card could be acceptable. If you like listening to classic jazz
performances, classical music, or instrumental music and deejay or
stream capture or edit audio on your PC, then a second sound card or
an audio interface is needed. For a lousy $37, including shipping, why
is anyone anguishing and spending precious brain cells on such an
obvious decision.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net wrote:
 can you give us a sample of this cards sound quality?
 On 7/5/2014 4:16 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi,
 About $ 700

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Sunshine Sent: Saturday, July
 05, 2014 10:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Is
 Integrated Sound Adequate?
 how much does the sound card you use cost ?

 On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most
 use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good
 sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
 I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which
 sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card
 of my laptop for everyday use.

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

 Hi all,

 I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
 motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
 about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
 now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
 adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
 old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

 I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
 before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
 don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
 ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
 space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

 I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
 thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
 to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

 Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

 Regards Steve.

















Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Petro Giannakopoulos
Is this Roland unit plug n play? No software and does it have controls on 
it?

- Original Message - 
From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?


Steve,

It all depends on the kind of system you have and the fussiness of
your ears. At the end of last year, I bought a Dell 8700 computer with
the Intel i7 4770 processor, the fastest chip on the market at the
time. It had built-in HD audio. When the Dell pre-amp was configured,
the audio sounded as good as the M-Audio 24/96 sound card I bought 10
years ago with the highly regarded Casio drivers. The computer came
with separate jacks for a quadrophonic speaker setup as well as 5.1
audio in addition to the regular jacks for traditional stereo, line in
and microphones.  Computers with less sophisticated microprocessors
may not have as many options or HD audio.

That said, I want one sound card for the screen reader and one sound
card for audio playback and recording. To that end, I bought a Roland
Duo USB audio interface for $37 on eBay. It normally retails for $200.
Dancing Dots recommends this audio interface to its customers using
Windows computers. The company is the leader in accessible music and
audio production by the blind. The audio from the Roland interface
sounds real and lifelike and instruments are more distinct than the
integrated sound card. This should be no surprise as the audio is
processed outside the machine in a different cycle from the computer.
Try as they do, Intel and Dell cannot deliver in a mass-market product
the quality that audio focused companies have been doing for years. If
you just listen to spoken word audio and popular music, the integrated
card could be acceptable. If you like listening to classic jazz
performances, classical music, or instrumental music and deejay or
stream capture or edit audio on your PC, then a second sound card or
an audio interface is needed. For a lousy $37, including shipping, why
is anyone anguishing and spending precious brain cells on such an
obvious decision.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net wrote:
 can you give us a sample of this cards sound quality?
 On 7/5/2014 4:16 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi,
 About $ 700

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Sunshine Sent: Saturday, July
 05, 2014 10:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Is
 Integrated Sound Adequate?
 how much does the sound card you use cost ?

 On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most
 use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good
 sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
 I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which
 sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card
 of my laptop for everyday use.

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

 Hi all,

 I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
 motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
 about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
 now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
 adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
 old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

 I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
 before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
 don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
 ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
 space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

 I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
 thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
 to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

 Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

 Regards Steve.
















---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com




RE: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Hamit Campos
You have the Dell XPS 8700? Epic! I so want one. I would expect the audio from 
it to be very good since it's a home theater PC. Thanks for sharing how good it 
is though.

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Kelly Pierce
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:56 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Steve,

It all depends on the kind of system you have and the fussiness of your ears. 
At the end of last year, I bought a Dell 8700 computer with the Intel i7 4770 
processor, the fastest chip on the market at the time. It had built-in HD 
audio. When the Dell pre-amp was configured, the audio sounded as good as the 
M-Audio 24/96 sound card I bought 10 years ago with the highly regarded Casio 
drivers. The computer came with separate jacks for a quadrophonic speaker setup 
as well as 5.1 audio in addition to the regular jacks for traditional stereo, 
line in and microphones.  Computers with less sophisticated microprocessors may 
not have as many options or HD audio.

That said, I want one sound card for the screen reader and one sound card for 
audio playback and recording. To that end, I bought a Roland Duo USB audio 
interface for $37 on eBay. It normally retails for $200.
Dancing Dots recommends this audio interface to its customers using Windows 
computers. The company is the leader in accessible music and audio production 
by the blind. The audio from the Roland interface sounds real and lifelike and 
instruments are more distinct than the integrated sound card. This should be no 
surprise as the audio is processed outside the machine in a different cycle 
from the computer.
Try as they do, Intel and Dell cannot deliver in a mass-market product the 
quality that audio focused companies have been doing for years. If you just 
listen to spoken word audio and popular music, the integrated card could be 
acceptable. If you like listening to classic jazz performances, classical 
music, or instrumental music and deejay or stream capture or edit audio on your 
PC, then a second sound card or an audio interface is needed. For a lousy $37, 
including shipping, why is anyone anguishing and spending precious brain cells 
on such an obvious decision.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net wrote:
 can you give us a sample of this cards sound quality?
 On 7/5/2014 4:16 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi,
 About $ 700

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Sunshine Sent: Saturday, July 
 05, 2014 10:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Is 
 Integrated Sound Adequate?
 how much does the sound card you use cost ?

 On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most 
 use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good 
 sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
 I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which 
 sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound 
 card of my laptop for everyday use.

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

 Hi all,

 I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in 
 motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's 
 thoughts about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound 
 card or have we now reached the stage where using integrated sound 
 on the motherboard is adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 
 so it is about six years old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

 I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC 
 before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available 
 but I don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like 
 is the ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I 
 have limited space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker 
 system.

 I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but 
 I thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are 
 bound to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality 
 etc.

 Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

 Regards Steve.



















RE: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Hamit Campos
How current is it? Can one only get it on E-Bay? What sample rate and bit 
deapth can it do?

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Petro 
Giannakopoulos
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 3:06 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Is this Roland unit plug n play? No software and does it have controls on it?

- Original Message -
From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?


Steve,

It all depends on the kind of system you have and the fussiness of
your ears. At the end of last year, I bought a Dell 8700 computer with
the Intel i7 4770 processor, the fastest chip on the market at the
time. It had built-in HD audio. When the Dell pre-amp was configured,
the audio sounded as good as the M-Audio 24/96 sound card I bought 10
years ago with the highly regarded Casio drivers. The computer came
with separate jacks for a quadrophonic speaker setup as well as 5.1
audio in addition to the regular jacks for traditional stereo, line in
and microphones.  Computers with less sophisticated microprocessors
may not have as many options or HD audio.

That said, I want one sound card for the screen reader and one sound
card for audio playback and recording. To that end, I bought a Roland
Duo USB audio interface for $37 on eBay. It normally retails for $200.
Dancing Dots recommends this audio interface to its customers using
Windows computers. The company is the leader in accessible music and
audio production by the blind. The audio from the Roland interface
sounds real and lifelike and instruments are more distinct than the
integrated sound card. This should be no surprise as the audio is
processed outside the machine in a different cycle from the computer.
Try as they do, Intel and Dell cannot deliver in a mass-market product
the quality that audio focused companies have been doing for years. If
you just listen to spoken word audio and popular music, the integrated
card could be acceptable. If you like listening to classic jazz
performances, classical music, or instrumental music and deejay or
stream capture or edit audio on your PC, then a second sound card or
an audio interface is needed. For a lousy $37, including shipping, why
is anyone anguishing and spending precious brain cells on such an
obvious decision.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net wrote:
 can you give us a sample of this cards sound quality?
 On 7/5/2014 4:16 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi,
 About $ 700

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Sunshine Sent: Saturday, July
 05, 2014 10:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Is
 Integrated Sound Adequate?
 how much does the sound card you use cost ?

 On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most
 use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good
 sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
 I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which
 sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card
 of my laptop for everyday use.

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

 Hi all,

 I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
 motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
 about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we
 now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
 adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
 old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

 I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
 before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
 don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
 ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited
 space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

 I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
 thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
 to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

 Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

 Regards Steve.
















---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com






Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Kelly Pierce
Petro,

A driver needs to be installed on the computer each time it is plugged
into a USB jack. This likely would be once for a home-based computer.
The installer for the driver has one button that cannot be recognized
by JAWS in Windows 8.1. It took a sighted person less than 30 seconds
to find the button on the screen and activate it with the mouse
though.  Once the driver is installed, all of its properties can be
adjusted with JAWS. In addition, all the controls on the unit are
tactile and are either toggle buttons or volume sliders. When the
toggle buttons are pressed, they are depressed so a blind person or a
sighted person in a dark location can tactilely feel if the button is
activated.

I hope this has been helpful.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Petro Giannakopoulos petro...@clear.net wrote:
 Is this Roland unit plug n play? No software and does it have controls on
 it?

 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:56 PM
 Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?


 Steve,

 It all depends on the kind of system you have and the fussiness of
 your ears. At the end of last year, I bought a Dell 8700 computer with
 the Intel i7 4770 processor, the fastest chip on the market at the
 time. It had built-in HD audio. When the Dell pre-amp was configured,
 the audio sounded as good as the M-Audio 24/96 sound card I bought 10
 years ago with the highly regarded Casio drivers. The computer came
 with separate jacks for a quadrophonic speaker setup as well as 5.1
 audio in addition to the regular jacks for traditional stereo, line in
 and microphones.  Computers with less sophisticated microprocessors
 may not have as many options or HD audio.

 That said, I want one sound card for the screen reader and one sound
 card for audio playback and recording. To that end, I bought a Roland
 Duo USB audio interface for $37 on eBay. It normally retails for $200.
 Dancing Dots recommends this audio interface to its customers using
 Windows computers. The company is the leader in accessible music and
 audio production by the blind. The audio from the Roland interface
 sounds real and lifelike and instruments are more distinct than the
 integrated sound card. This should be no surprise as the audio is
 processed outside the machine in a different cycle from the computer.
 Try as they do, Intel and Dell cannot deliver in a mass-market product
 the quality that audio focused companies have been doing for years. If
 you just listen to spoken word audio and popular music, the integrated
 card could be acceptable. If you like listening to classic jazz
 performances, classical music, or instrumental music and deejay or
 stream capture or edit audio on your PC, then a second sound card or
 an audio interface is needed. For a lousy $37, including shipping, why
 is anyone anguishing and spending precious brain cells on such an
 obvious decision.

 Kelly




 On 7/5/14, Sunshine sunsh...@abe.midco.net wrote:
 can you give us a sample of this cards sound quality?
 On 7/5/2014 4:16 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi,
 About $ 700

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Sunshine Sent: Saturday, July
 05, 2014 10:15 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: Is
 Integrated Sound Adequate?
 how much does the sound card you use cost ?

 On 7/5/2014 3:10 AM, Brian Olesen wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 The audio on one of the better motherboards today is fine for most
 use. But when we speak hifi quality high bit rates, and real good
 sound you'd still need a deticated sound card with better cerkitry.
 I use a pretty expensive audio card from RME called Babyface which
 sounds amazing, but i'm fully sattesfied with the build in sound card
 of my laptop for everyday use.

 Best regards
 Brian

 -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Steve Pattison
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:29 AM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

 Hi all,

 I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
 motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
 about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have
 we
 now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard
 is
 adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years
 old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

 I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC
 before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I
 don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the
 ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have
 limited
 space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

 I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
 thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound
 to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

 Any feedback

Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-05 Thread Kelly Pierce
Hamit,

The Dell XPS 8700 purchase was two years in the making. I had a
Pentium 4 computer that I bought in 2004 running Windows XP. I was
unimpressed with Windows 7 when it was released in 2009 and soon heard
about new technology that would be the next generation of innovation
in personal computers. Specifically, this included USB 3, flash hard
drives, and faster processors from Intel. In September 2011, my
computer stopped working. Thank god for external backup drives. I
decided to wait until the upcoming windows 8 so I could have a
computer with the latest technology.  I bought a used HP D530C from
Chicago Surplus Computer for $85 to tide me over until the next
generation of computing arrived. As we all know, the initial windows 8
rollout was a disaster, particularly for the screen reader user.  The
interface was too futuristic for most. Microsoft regrouped and
delivered the vastly improved Windows 8.1 last fall.

To my delight, Intel opened a store here in Chicago in late November
to display products from its vendors and inform the public about its
processors. I learned there how a computer choice starts with the chip
and learned about the fastest chip for desktop computers. I searched
around and found that a local outlet of a computer superstore chain
was selling a customized version of the Dell 8700. The computer had a
256 GB solid-state drive along with a 2 Tb regular rotating hard
drive, loads of USB 3.0 jacks, 24 GB of RAM along with the fast Intel
4770 chip. It was everything I wanted and much more. I raced to the
store on December 26 with a bad cold to snatch it before it was bought
by someone else.

Now, the Intel 4770 is no longer the fastest. It has been surpassed by
the 4790, an incremental upgrade. The next big boost in performance
will be with the next generation of Intel processors that will be
released either later this year or in the first half of next year.
When this new generation of processors is combined with Windows 9, we
can enjoy the next generation of desktop computing. We are now in a
transition period between the Haswell processors and Windows 8.1 to
the new generation of Intel processors and Windows 9. If you can wait
until next year, you will likely be pleased at the performance you can
obtain for the money.

The Roland Duo Capture audio interface can be bought at a number of
outlets that sell professional audio equipment. I believe I have the
model before the current shipping version. Mine cannot support
recording from an iPhone or iPad while the current shipping version
can.  The eBay offering sold for a more than 80 percent discount than
the current shipping version.  The drivers for it though support
Windows 8.1.

If I were to pay full price, I would actually purchase the Roland Quad
Capture audio interface. It is just $70 more than the full retail
price of the Roland Duo Capture and has a few more worthwhile
features. It has a maximum capacity of 192,000 samples for recording.
The Duo Capture’s upper limit is 44,100 samples. Both support 24-bit
audio though. Useful functionality for the blind computer user is the
Auto-Sens function that intelligently sets optimal input levels for
both of the unit’s pre-amps. Roland Quad Capture is the audio
interface personally used by Bill McCann, the founder and President of
Dancing Dots, on his machines.  When I spoke with Bill earlier this
year about the two audio interfaces, it seemed I was more impressed
with the Auto-Sens functionality than he was. Yet, how could I
disagree with the wise master, who has set his own levels on audio
devices for decades, for his exquisite audio choice given that he
handles and listens to these devices every day.

Talk to you later.

Kelly




On 7/5/14, Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com wrote:
 Petro,

 A driver needs to be installed on the computer each time it is plugged
 into a USB jack. This likely would be once for a home-based computer.
 The installer for the driver has one button that cannot be recognized
 by JAWS in Windows 8.1. It took a sighted person less than 30 seconds
 to find the button on the screen and activate it with the mouse
 though.  Once the driver is installed, all of its properties can be
 adjusted with JAWS. In addition, all the controls on the unit are
 tactile and are either toggle buttons or volume sliders. When the
 toggle buttons are pressed, they are depressed so a blind person or a
 sighted person in a dark location can tactilely feel if the button is
 activated.

 I hope this has been helpful.

 Kelly




 On 7/5/14, Petro Giannakopoulos petro...@clear.net wrote:
 Is this Roland unit plug n play? No software and does it have controls on
 it?

 - Original Message -
 From: Kelly Pierce kellyt...@gmail.com
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 1:56 PM
 Subject: Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?


 Steve,

 It all depends on the kind of system you have and the fussiness of
 your ears. At the end of last year, I bought

Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-04 Thread Steve Pattison

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in 
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts 
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we 
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is 
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years 
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.


I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC 
before. Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I 
don't want it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the 
ability to provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited 
space where my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.


I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I 
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound 
to be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.


Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.



Re: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-04 Thread Byron Stephens
Personally I think it's still better to get a different card. As a 
broadcaster I wouldn't use the integraded audio.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 5:29 PM
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?



Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in 
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts 
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we 
now reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is 
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years 
old. I'm currently running a Creative sound card.


I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC before. 
Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I don't want 
it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the ability to 
provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited space where 
my PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.


I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I 
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound to 
be a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.


Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com




RE: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

2014-07-04 Thread Hamit Campos
If you want virtual surround sound or as I state it, fake surround sound,
then let me recommend the Bose Companion 5 Multy Media speakers. Note they
are #$300 though. But they are cool for what they are. They at least will
give you epic Bose sound.

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Pattison
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 8:29 PM
To: PC Audio
Subject: Is Integrated Sound Adequate?

Hi all,

I'm planning to buy a new computer. With the rapid advancements in
motherboards and hardware generally I'm interested in people's thoughts
about whether it's still better to buy a dedicated sound card or have we now
reached the stage where using integrated sound on the motherboard is
adequate? I bought my current PC in July 2008 so it is about six years old.
I'm currently running a Creative sound card.

I've never used integrated sound on the motherboard on my home PC before.
Also I don't need the most expensive sound card available but I don't want
it to be too basic either. One feature I would like is the ability to
provide some type of virtual surround sound as I have limited space where my
PC is located and only room for a two speaker system.

I appreciate there is no right or wrong answer to this question but I
thought this list would be a good place to ask because there are bound to be
a lot of people who are a bit more fussy about audio quality etc.

Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards Steve.