Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-18 Thread Anders Holmberg
Hi!
Vlc and foobar is still being updated.
Though i haven't  tested them in a long time now since i am on a mac.
/A
 17 feb 2015 kl. 21:51 skrev Joe Paton j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk:
 
 Steve,
 
 I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use to
 handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio player
 that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?
 
 Cheers for now
 
 JOe
 
 On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
 Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of 
 Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp was 
 taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I wrote to 
 the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about the future 
 of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to 
 think even though there have been promises of new versions of Winamp that 
 development of Winamp has been abandoned.
 
 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as Foobar2000 
 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly because of 
 the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used with the Window-Eyes 
 scripts.
 
 Regards Steve.
 
 -- 
 Joe Paton j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk
 
 




Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Brent Harding
I don't think too many new audio formats are going to come out. It probably 
would be protocols to deliver internet streaming that could change from 
Shoutcast and Icecast over time, but I think it should still be available on 
Winamp.com.


- Original Message - 
From: Joe Paton j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp



Steve,

I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use 
to
handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio 
player

that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

Cheers for now

JOe

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of 
Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp 
was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I 
wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about 
the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm 
starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of 
Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.


I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as 
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is 
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used 
with the Window-Eyes scripts.


Regards Steve.

--
Joe Paton j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk








RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Brett Boyer
Well, I have been a foobar2000  user for over 4 years. Though I still use
winamp, I'm not worried!
If you haven't tried foobar yet, here is a site to help with those winamp
withdrawals.
http://winamp2foobar.blogspot.com/

Yes, as always, there are a few bumps in the road, but they're easy to get
over.
For example, Foobar2000 does not come with a complete list of shortcut keys,
but you can set up your own shortcut keys for every single command in the
program.
And, one thing that foobar2000 has that winamp has never used, multiple
playlists, or tabs,  in the same window. You can even cut copy and paste
between all playlist tabs.

If the Winamp ship is sinking, you might want to take a look!
Hth
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank
Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:40 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

yup

On 2/17/2015 2:17 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 Hank:  Thanks for that!  So I guess as long as Ninite is still around, 
 then we'll be in luck!
 Tom Kaufman

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of 
 Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:15 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 yes I got mine from ninite

 On 2/17/2015 2:09 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 The other thing is, if something happens and I lose my version of 
 Winamp,
 is
 it still possible to get the last version that came out?
 Tom Kaufman

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of 
 Joe
 Paton
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:51 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 Steve,

 I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to 
 use
 to
 handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an 
 audio player that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

 Cheers for now

 JOe

 On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
 Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

 Hi all,

 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future 
 development of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 
 just before Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com 
 and www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a 
 few weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no 
 response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though 
 there have been promises of new versions of Winamp that development of
Winamp has been abandoned.

 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
 Foobar2000
 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly 
 because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used 
 with the Window-Eyes scripts.

 Regards Steve.









RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Mike Bernard
Yes, they actually did  discontinued them. I got my copy along with the 
associated xml file through someone else who still uses them today. They've got 
version 3.8.3.
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank Smith, 
and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:53 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

can you even still purcahse the sam encoders?
if so how much?
thought they discontinued the encoders.
On 2/17/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with 
 a new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
 Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice 
 up your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
 broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built right 
 in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
 yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
   You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary 
 plugins it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more 
 about it here:
 http://www.stationplaylist.com
 Mike
 Rochester, NY.
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
 Pattison
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: The Future of Winamp

 Hi all,

 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development
 of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before
 Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and
 www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few
 weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I
 hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been
 promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been
 abandoned.

 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
 Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is
 mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is
 used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

 Regards Steve.









RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Mike Bernard
Hi Steve,
I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with a 
new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice up 
your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built right 
in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
 You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary plugins 
it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more about it here:
http://www.stationplaylist.com
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
Pattison
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
To: PC Audio
Subject: The Future of Winamp

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development 
of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before 
Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and 
www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few 
weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I 
hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been 
promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been 
abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as 
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is 
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is 
used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.





Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona

can you even still purcahse the sam encoders?
if so how much?
thought they discontinued the encoders.
On 2/17/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:

Hi Steve,
I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with a 
new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice up 
your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built right 
in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
  You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary plugins 
it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more about it here:
http://www.stationplaylist.com
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
Pattison
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
To: PC Audio
Subject: The Future of Winamp

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development
of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before
Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and
www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few
weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I
hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been
promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been
abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is
used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.








Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona

is there a way to purcahse the older encoders/  or am I out of luck?

On 2/17/2015 1:07 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:

Yes, they actually did  discontinued them. I got my copy along with the 
associated xml file through someone else who still uses them today. They've got 
version 3.8.3.
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank Smith, 
and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:53 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

can you even still purcahse the sam encoders?
if so how much?
thought they discontinued the encoders.
On 2/17/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:

Hi Steve,
I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with a 
new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice up 
your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built right 
in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
   You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary 
plugins it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more about 
it here:
http://www.stationplaylist.com
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
Pattison
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
To: PC Audio
Subject: The Future of Winamp

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development
of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before
Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and
www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few
weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I
hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been
promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been
abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is
used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.












Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona

if you could please it would be appreciated
email:
hank.smith...@gmail.com

On 2/17/2015 1:13 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:

Not sure. If you'd like, I could email them to you Hank.
Mike
Rochester, NY.

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank Smith, 
and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:11 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

is there a way to purcahse the older encoders/  or am I out of luck?

On 2/17/2015 1:07 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:

Yes, they actually did  discontinued them. I got my copy along with the 
associated xml file through someone else who still uses them today. They've got 
version 3.8.3.
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank Smith, 
and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:53 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

can you even still purcahse the sam encoders?
if so how much?
thought they discontinued the encoders.
On 2/17/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:

Hi Steve,
I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with a 
new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice up 
your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built right 
in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary 
plugins it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more about 
it here:
http://www.stationplaylist.com
Mike
Rochester, NY.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
Pattison
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
To: PC Audio
Subject: The Future of Winamp

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development
of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before
Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and
www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few
weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I
hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been
promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been
abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is
used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.















RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Mike Bernard
Not sure. If you'd like, I could email them to you Hank.
Mike
Rochester, NY.

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank Smith, 
and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:11 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

is there a way to purcahse the older encoders/  or am I out of luck?

On 2/17/2015 1:07 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:
 Yes, they actually did  discontinued them. I got my copy along with the 
 associated xml file through someone else who still uses them today. They've 
 got version 3.8.3.
 Mike
 Rochester, NY.
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank 
 Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:53 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 can you even still purcahse the sam encoders?
 if so how much?
 thought they discontinued the encoders.
 On 2/17/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with 
 a new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
 Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice 
 up your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
 broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built 
 right in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
 yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary 
 plugins it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more 
 about it here:
 http://www.stationplaylist.com
 Mike
 Rochester, NY.
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
 Pattison
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: The Future of Winamp

 Hi all,

 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development
 of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before
 Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and
 www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few
 weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I
 hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been
 promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been
 abandoned.

 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
 Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is
 mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is
 used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

 Regards Steve.












Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Evan Reese
I mostly agree with this. The chief problem I've had with not having an 
update to Winamp is that it doesn't know what CDs are anymore, except those 
newer ones that have their track data embeded in the CD itself. I have 
gotten some of those recently. But most CDs still come back Unknown when I 
try to rip them with Winamp.
However, now that I've found a CD ripper that usually does know what it's 
ripping, and that works very well, (EZ CD Audio Converter), not being able 
to do it with Winamp is not such an issue anymore.
So it would be nice to see that someone was behind the program, but it 
doesn't matter as much to me now as it used to. As long as it keeps working 
I'll keep using it for what it can do.

Evan

-Original Message- 
From: Chris Skarstad

Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:43 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Well, I figure as long as it works, why add anything new?  I think it
works beautifully with the window-eyes scripts.  Unless someone comes up
with a feature that we just gotta have, i'm happy with it staying the
way it is.


On 2/17/2015 1:50 PM, Steve Pattison wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of 
Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp 
was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I 
wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about 
the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm 
starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of 
Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.


I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as 
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is 
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used 
with the Window-Eyes scripts.


Regards Steve.







The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Steve Pattison

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development 
of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before 
Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and 
www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few 
weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I 
hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been 
promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been 
abandoned.


I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as 
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is 
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is 
used with the Window-Eyes scripts.


Regards Steve.



Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Chris Skarstad
Well, I figure as long as it works, why add anything new?  I think it 
works beautifully with the window-eyes scripts.  Unless someone comes up 
with a feature that we just gotta have, i'm happy with it staying the 
way it is.



On 2/17/2015 1:50 PM, Steve Pattison wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development 
of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before 
Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and 
www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few 
weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. 
I hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been 
promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been 
abandoned.


I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as 
Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is 
mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is 
used with the Window-Eyes scripts.


Regards Steve.







Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Joe Paton
Steve,

I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use to
handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio player
that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

Cheers for now

JOe

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of 
Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp was 
taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I wrote to 
the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about the future of 
Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think 
even though there have been promises of new versions of Winamp that development 
of Winamp has been abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as Foobar2000 and 
VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly because of the 
extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used with the Window-Eyes 
scripts.

Regards Steve.

-- 
Joe Paton j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk




RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Tom Kaufman
I miss the Auto-Tagger in Winamp (unless I know exactly the track titles and
such, there is no way that I know of to get the information; even when I
find out, then one must do it manually!  Outside of that, I still will
continue to use Winamp as my player of choice!
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
Reese
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:23 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

I mostly agree with this. The chief problem I've had with not having an 
update to Winamp is that it doesn't know what CDs are anymore, except those 
newer ones that have their track data embeded in the CD itself. I have 
gotten some of those recently. But most CDs still come back Unknown when I 
try to rip them with Winamp.
However, now that I've found a CD ripper that usually does know what it's 
ripping, and that works very well, (EZ CD Audio Converter), not being able 
to do it with Winamp is not such an issue anymore.
So it would be nice to see that someone was behind the program, but it 
doesn't matter as much to me now as it used to. As long as it keeps working 
I'll keep using it for what it can do.
Evan

-Original Message- 
From: Chris Skarstad
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 2:43 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Well, I figure as long as it works, why add anything new?  I think it
works beautifully with the window-eyes scripts.  Unless someone comes up
with a feature that we just gotta have, i'm happy with it staying the
way it is.


On 2/17/2015 1:50 PM, Steve Pattison wrote:
 Hi all,

 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of 
 Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp 
 was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I 
 wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about 
 the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm 
 starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of 
 Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.

 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as 
 Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is 
 mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used 
 with the Window-Eyes scripts.

 Regards Steve.







RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Tom Kaufman
The other thing is, if something happens and I lose my version of Winamp, is
it still possible to get the last version that came out?
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Joe Paton
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:51 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Steve,

I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use to
handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio
player
that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

Cheers for now

JOe

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of
Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp
was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I
wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about
the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm
starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of
Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as Foobar2000
and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly because
of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used with the
Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.

-- 
Joe Paton j...@vi-ability.demon.co.uk





RE: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Tom Kaufman
Hank:  Thanks for that!  So I guess as long as Ninite is still around, then
we'll be in luck!
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank
Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:15 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

yes I got mine from ninite

On 2/17/2015 2:09 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 The other thing is, if something happens and I lose my version of Winamp,
is
 it still possible to get the last version that came out?
 Tom Kaufman

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Joe
Paton
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:51 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 Steve,

 I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use
to
 handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio
 player
 that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

 Cheers for now

 JOe

 On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
 Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

 Hi all,

 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of
 Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp
 was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I
 wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about
 the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm
 starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of
 Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.

 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
Foobar2000
 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly because
 of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used with the
 Window-Eyes scripts.

 Regards Steve.






Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona

yes I got mine from ninite

On 2/17/2015 2:09 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:

The other thing is, if something happens and I lose my version of Winamp, is
it still possible to get the last version that came out?
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Joe Paton
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:51 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Steve,

I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use to
handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio
player
that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

Cheers for now

JOe

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of
Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp
was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I
wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about
the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm
starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of
Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as Foobar2000
and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly because
of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used with the
Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.






Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Scanlon
No I don’t think you can perchas them now. 
Also using SPL as a player is over the top. SPL does much more than play files.

P.


From: Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 6:52 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List 
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

can you even still purcahse the sam encoders?
if so how much?
thought they discontinued the encoders.
On 2/17/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Bernard wrote:
 Hi Steve,
 I certainly haven't heard anything on my end. Maybe they'll surprise us with 
 a new upgrade sometime in the near future. If not, I've heard that Station 
 Playlist Studio is very good. It has many plugins that you can use to spice 
 up your audio projects, and if you ever decided to, you can also use it for 
 broadcasting. Unlike Winamp, Station Playlist has all its plugins built right 
 in. Except for the sam encoders of course, which you'd have to install 
 yourself. In fact, if you already have them, if you got studio, when
   You startup the program, it will automatically grab all the necessary 
 plugins it needs from your Winamp folder and copy them. You can read more 
 about it here:
 http://www.stationplaylist.com
 Mike
 Rochester, NY.
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve 
 Pattison
 Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:51 PM
 To: PC Audio
 Subject: The Future of Winamp

 Hi all,

 Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development
 of Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before
 Winamp was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and
 www.winamp.com. I wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few
 weeks ago asking about the future of Winamp and received no response. I
 hope I'm wrong but I'm starting to think even though there have been
 promises of new versions of Winamp that development of Winamp has been
 abandoned.

 I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as
 Foobar2000 and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is
 mainly because of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is
 used with the Window-Eyes scripts.

 Regards Steve.






Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona

yup

On 2/17/2015 2:17 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:

Hank:  Thanks for that!  So I guess as long as Ninite is still around, then
we'll be in luck!
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Hank
Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:15 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

yes I got mine from ninite

On 2/17/2015 2:09 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:

The other thing is, if something happens and I lose my version of Winamp,

is

it still possible to get the last version that came out?
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Joe

Paton

Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:51 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Steve,

I have used winamp for years, and love it.  But my worry is, what to use

to

handle new streaming formats as they are implemented? Is there an audio
player
that handles as many diverse filetypes as winamp?

Cheers for now

JOe

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 05:50:43 +1100
Steve Pattison s...@internode.on.net wrote:

Hi all,

Is it just me or is anyone else concerned about the future development of
Winamp? The last version came out in mid December 2013 just before Winamp
was taken over by Radionomy. See www.radionomy.com and www.winamp.com. I
wrote to the developers of Winamp on Twitter a few weeks ago asking about
the future of Winamp and received no response. I hope I'm wrong but I'm
starting to think even though there have been promises of new versions of
Winamp that development of Winamp has been abandoned.

I know that there are plenty of other good audio players such as

Foobar2000

and VLC media player available. the reason I like Winamp is mainly because
of the extra functionality added to Winamp when it is used with the
Window-Eyes scripts.

Regards Steve.









Re: The Future of Winamp

2015-02-17 Thread Steve Pattison

Hi Tom and all,

Regarding the installer for Winamp one thing I have done for a very long 
time is to save all the installers of the programs I use on two external 
hard disks. The reason I do this on two disks is that if one disk fails 
I'll still have a copy of the installers as it is unlikely that both 
hard disks will fail at the same time. I also save the serial numbers of 
any software I buy on those same hard disks.


This has helped me tremendously a few times when I've had to format my 
hard disk or put software on to a new computer. If you have all the 
installers and serial numbers it means that you don't have to download 
all the software again and that saves a huge amount of time and 
frustration! Also you don't have the problem of recovering a lost serial 
number of any software you have purchased.


I just checked and Winamp can still be downloaded from

www.majorgeeks.com

and probably many other places as well. Just download and save the 
installer and you'll have a copy if you ever need to install it again 
for any reason.


Regards Steve.

On 18/02/2015 8:09 AM, Tom Kaufman wrote:

The other thing is, if something happens and I lose my version of Winamp, is
it still possible to get the last version that came out?




RE: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Andre van Deventer
Hi Anders

There is actually a special version of Foobar which can do much more than
the standard one.  Which one do you have.  As far as I can understand it,
the special one can burnCD's also.

Andre


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anders Holmberg
Sent: 15 November 2004 09:58 AM
To: PC audio discussion list. 
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Hello!
Its very small so i dont' think it can rip cds but for most of the usual
formats such as ogg, mp3 wma wav etc it works very well.
You can check out more things at:
http.//www.foobar200.com.
/Anders.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp



  Or change to foobar2000.


 So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?

 Peter S.



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread RQJ
Hi Andre,
I tried the link in your message, but all I got was,
a page with 2 links, which were images, and nothing about the player you
mentioned.

Richard Justice
- Original Message - 
From: Andre van Deventer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 3:12 AM
Subject: RE: The Future of Winamp


 Hi Anders

 There is actually a special version of Foobar which can do much more than
 the standard one.  Which one do you have.  As far as I can understand it,
 the special one can burnCD's also.

 Andre




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Anders Holmberg
 Sent: 15 November 2004 09:58 AM
 To: PC audio discussion list.
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 Hello!
 Its very small so i dont' think it can rip cds but for most of the usual
 formats such as ogg, mp3 wma wav etc it works very well.
 You can check out more things at:
 http.//www.foobar200.com.
 /Anders.
 - Original Message -
 From: Peter Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:34 AM
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


 
   Or change to foobar2000.
 
 
  So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?
 
  Peter S.
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Bruce Toews
Is it continually under development? If it is not, then we're in the same 
situation as with Winamp. What about plugins for cross-fading and sound 
normalization and other things? Which formats can it support? Why has no 
one been talking about it until now?

Bruce
--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
For the best oldies anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andre van Deventer wrote:
I cannot agree more!  I think the only problem is actually for those of you
who do broadcasting.  Although you can use Foobar 2000   to listen to
streams you cannot use it for broadcasting.
It is extremely screenreader friendly and has menus and shortcuts to work
with.
Go to
www.foobar2000.org
To download it.
Andre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anders Holmberg
Sent: 15 November 2004 09:05 AM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp
Hello!
Or change to foobar2000.
Its a very nice litle fast player.
/Anders.
- Original Message -
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

It may be a good idea to write AOL, but as Marty stated, even if they
don't
make future versions of Winamp, we can still get the benefits of using the
latest versions we have now.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

   Are people writing AOL?
I am serious..  I was amazed during oneo f the Nine Eleven fundraisers
hosted by AOL that oone of their  telephone volunteers knew all about
the
legitimate compalints by blind people about AOL.
I am willing to write and  call on this issue.
- Original Message -
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If
they
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got,
if
we
can use it.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp

*** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
nullsoft
company?  amazing! just amazing!
If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
does
one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to
one
company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to
understand
this.
something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
... goodness, one more thing! grin.
From an article on the Betanews site:
Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
By
Nate Mook
, BetaNews
November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
and
the door
has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
audio
player with
minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
\
Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company
who
say
the software
has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder
and
Winamp creator
Justin Frankel last January.
The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
AOL
acquired
the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
Winamp developers
was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
rebellion.
Although
Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long
until
the
two ideologies
collided.
Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas
over
coffee and
bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
fellow
Nullsoft
developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file
sharing
system, dubbed
Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
Gnutella was unveiled
in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
feared
the program
would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's
pending
merger with
Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
software's
source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed,
igniting
a
peer-to-peer
land grab that has yet to subside.
But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
the
freely available
Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous
times,
but
always
escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
unsanctioned
release

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Bruce Toews
Can you tell me this? Would you recommend it instead of Winamp? And if so, 
why?

Bruce
--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
For the best oldies anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Anders Holmberg wrote:
Hello!
Its very small so i dont' think it can rip cds but for most of the usual
formats such as ogg, mp3 wma wav etc it works very well.
You can check out more things at:
http.//www.foobar200.com.
/Anders.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


Or change to foobar2000.

So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?
Peter S.

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Andre van Deventer
Hi Bruce

I simply like the feel of the thing more than winamp.  I like the way you
can work with the menus or shortcuts whichever you choose.

I am always careful about recommending things to people!   It does what I
want it to do.  It feels more like a windows programme to me than winamp.
The best thing may be to try to use it and see what happens.

Andre
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
Sent: 15 November 2004 01:12 PM
To: PC audio discussion list. 
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Can you tell me this? Would you recommend it instead of Winamp? And if so,
why?

Bruce

--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site (including
info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net For the best oldies
anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Anders Holmberg wrote:

 Hello!
 Its very small so i dont' think it can rip cds but for most of the 
 usual formats such as ogg, mp3 wma wav etc it works very well.
 You can check out more things at:
 http.//www.foobar200.com.
 /Anders.
 - Original Message -
 From: Peter Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:34 AM
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp



 Or change to foobar2000.


 So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?

 Peter S.



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Anders Holmberg
HellO!
I was when i used foobar i used the light one.
But now i will go from winamp to foobar the special one.
/Anders.
- Original Message - 
From: Andre van Deventer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: The Future of Winamp


 Hi Anders

 There is actually a special version of Foobar which can do much more than
 the standard one.  Which one do you have.  As far as I can understand it,
 the special one can burnCD's also.

 Andre




 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Anders Holmberg
 Sent: 15 November 2004 09:58 AM
 To: PC audio discussion list.
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 Hello!
 Its very small so i dont' think it can rip cds but for most of the usual
 formats such as ogg, mp3 wma wav etc it works very well.
 You can check out more things at:
 http.//www.foobar200.com.
 /Anders.
 - Original Message -
 From: Peter Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:34 AM
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


 
   Or change to foobar2000.
 
 
  So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?
 
  Peter S.
 
 
 
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
 
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Anders Holmberg
Hello!
I think i wrote about it on the pc-auio list about half a year ago but did
not get any answers so i thougt no one was interested.
Tyats why.
I like it its great.
GREAT!
It starts much faster and is under continously developping.
/Anders.
- Original Message - 
From: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: The Future of Winamp


 Is it continually under development? If it is not, then we're in the same
 situation as with Winamp. What about plugins for cross-fading and sound
 normalization and other things? Which formats can it support? Why has no
 one been talking about it until now?

 Bruce

 -- 
 Bruce Toews
 E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
 For the best oldies anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com

 On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andre van Deventer wrote:

  I cannot agree more!  I think the only problem is actually for those of
you
  who do broadcasting.  Although you can use Foobar 2000   to listen to
  streams you cannot use it for broadcasting.
 
  It is extremely screenreader friendly and has menus and shortcuts to
work
  with.
 
  Go to
  www.foobar2000.org
  To download it.
 
  Andre
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On Behalf Of Anders Holmberg
  Sent: 15 November 2004 09:05 AM
  To: PC audio discussion list.
  Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp
 
  Hello!
  Or change to foobar2000.
  Its a very nice litle fast player.
  /Anders.
  - Original Message -
  From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 6:42 PM
  Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp
 
 
  It may be a good idea to write AOL, but as Marty stated, even if they
  don't
  make future versions of Winamp, we can still get the benefits of using
the
  latest versions we have now.
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:22 PM
  Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp
 
 
 Are people writing AOL?
  I am serious..  I was amazed during oneo f the Nine Eleven fundraisers
  hosted by AOL that oone of their  telephone volunteers knew all about
  the
  legitimate compalints by blind people about AOL.
  I am willing to write and  call on this issue.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:26 AM
  Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp
 
 
  It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If
  they
  stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've
got,
  if
  we
  can use it.
  - Original Message -
  From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
  Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp
 
 
  *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
  On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
  nullsoft
  company?  amazing! just amazing!
 
  If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
  does
  one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to
  one
  company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to
  understand
  this.
  something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
 
  ... goodness, one more thing! grin.
 
  From an article on the Betanews site:
  Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
  By
  Nate Mook
  , BetaNews
  November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
  The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to
AOL
  and
  the door
  has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
  Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
  audio
  player with
  minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
  \
  Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company
  who
  say
  the software
  has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder
  and
  Winamp creator
  Justin Frankel last January.
  The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
  AOL
  acquired
  the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
  Winamp developers
  was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
  rebellion.
  Although
  Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long
  until
  the
  two ideologies
  collided.
  Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas
  over
  coffee and
  bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
  fellow
  Nullsoft
  developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file
  sharing
  system, dubbed
  Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Gary Wood
Hi Anders.  Thanks for that, but I've never heard of that player.
- Original Message - 
From: Anders Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


Hello!
Or change to foobar2000.
Its a very nice litle fast player.
/Anders.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


It may be a good idea to write AOL, but as Marty stated, even if they
don't
make future versions of Winamp, we can still get the benefits of using 
the
latest versions we have now.
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

Are people writing AOL?
 I am serious..  I was amazed during oneo f the Nine Eleven fundraisers
 hosted by AOL that oone of their  telephone volunteers knew all about
the
 legitimate compalints by blind people about AOL.
 I am willing to write and  call on this issue.


 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:26 AM
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


 It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If
 they
 stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got,
if
 we
 can use it.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
 Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


  *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
  On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
  nullsoft
  company?  amazing! just amazing!
 
  If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
  does
  one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to
one
  company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to
understand
  this.
  something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
 
  ... goodness, one more thing! grin.
 
 From an article on the Betanews site:
  Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
  By
  Nate Mook
  , BetaNews
  November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
  The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to 
  AOL
  and
  the door
  has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
  Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
  audio
  player with
  minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
  \
  Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company
who
  say
  the software
  has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder
and
  Winamp creator
  Justin Frankel last January.
  The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
  AOL
  acquired
  the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
  Winamp developers
  was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
  rebellion.
  Although
  Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long
until
  the
  two ideologies
  collided.
  Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas
over
  coffee and
  bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
  fellow
  Nullsoft
  developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file
sharing
  system, dubbed
  Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
  Gnutella was unveiled
  in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
  feared
  the program
  would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's
pending
  merger with
  Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before 
  the
  software's
  source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed,
igniting
  a
  peer-to-peer
  land grab that has yet to subside.
  But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
  the
  freely available
  Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous
times,
  but
  always
  escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
  However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
  unsanctioned
  release of WASTE
  -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
  threatened
  to resign
  after AOL
  removed WASTE
  , but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
  Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of
Nullsoft's
  San
  Francisco
  offices in December 2003.
  With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
  700 additional layoffs
  planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
  supporting acquisitions
  such as Winamp.
  Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud

RE: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-15 Thread Andre van Deventer
Hi Bruce!

That's why I said I am careful  about recommending something to people.  It
always  depends on what works for your own needs.  It would be interesting
to write to the developers with the queries you mention and here what they
say.  It would be interesting to watch the development of this thing and see
where it goes.

Andre 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
Sent: 16 November 2004 01:21
To: PC audio discussion list. 
Subject: RE: The Future of Winamp

Well, the reason I asked wasn't to undermine you. I just feel no need to
switch to another program, but at the same time if this other program is
going to give me something that Winamp doesn't, I want to know about it. 
But since MP3 Pro is a very important requisite for me, that pretty much
decides it.

Bruce

--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site (including
info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net For the best oldies
anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Andre van Deventer wrote:

 Hi Bruce

 I simply like the feel of the thing more than winamp.  I like the way 
 you can work with the menus or shortcuts whichever you choose.

 I am always careful about recommending things to people!   It does what I
 want it to do.  It feels more like a windows programme to me than winamp.
 The best thing may be to try to use it and see what happens.

 Andre


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Bruce Toews
 Sent: 15 November 2004 01:12 PM
 To: PC audio discussion list.
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

 Can you tell me this? Would you recommend it instead of Winamp? And if 
 so, why?

 Bruce

 --
 Bruce Toews
 E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site 
 (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net For 
 the best oldies anywhere visit http://www.treasureislandoldies.com

 On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Anders Holmberg wrote:

 Hello!
 Its very small so i dont' think it can rip cds but for most of the 
 usual formats such as ogg, mp3 wma wav etc it works very well.
 You can check out more things at:
 http.//www.foobar200.com.
 /Anders.
 - Original Message -
 From: Peter Scanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:34 AM
 Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp



 Or change to foobar2000.


 So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?

 Peter S.



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 ___
 PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
 http://www.pc-audio.org

 To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-14 Thread Peter Scanlon

Or change to foobar2000.

So tell us what this player can do? what formats? Streaming? ripping?
Peter S.

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fwd: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Steve Pattison
*** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
nullsoft
company?  amazing! just amazing!

If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
does
one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
this.
something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.

... goodness, one more thing! grin.

From an article on the Betanews site:
Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
By
Nate Mook
, BetaNews
November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
and
the door
has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
audio
player with
minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
\
Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
say
the software
has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
Winamp creator
Justin Frankel last January.
The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
AOL
acquired
the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
Winamp developers
was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
rebellion.
Although
Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
the
two ideologies
collided.
Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
coffee and
bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
fellow
Nullsoft
developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
system, dubbed
Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
Gnutella was unveiled
in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
feared
the program
would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
merger with
Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
software's
source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
a
peer-to-peer
land grab that has yet to subside.
But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
the
freely available
Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
but
always
escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
unsanctioned
release of WASTE
-- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
threatened
to resign
after AOL
removed WASTE
, but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
San
Francisco
offices in December 2003.
With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
700 additional layoffs
planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
supporting acquisitions
such as Winamp.
Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
their accomplishments.
Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
60
million
users per month.
After a disappointing
Winamp3
, Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
long-standing goals
with the release of
Winamp 5.0
in late 2003.
Nullsoft's
Shoutcast
, which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
Net's
best secret
by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
accounting for
70 million hours of listening each month.
For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
thriving
product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
software, Winamp
seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
Sonique
, after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
stagnated for
years, and development ceased altogether last March.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you have eliminated the impossible.
whatever remains, however improbable,
must be the truth.
*** END FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***

Regards Steve,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype:  steve1963
MSN Messenger:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Gary Wood
It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they 
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if we 
can use it.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


*** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
nullsoft
company?  amazing! just amazing!
If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
does
one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
this.
something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
... goodness, one more thing! grin.
From an article on the Betanews site:
Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
By
Nate Mook
, BetaNews
November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
and
the door
has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
audio
player with
minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
\
Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
say
the software
has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
Winamp creator
Justin Frankel last January.
The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
AOL
acquired
the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
Winamp developers
was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
rebellion.
Although
Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
the
two ideologies
collided.
Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
coffee and
bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
fellow
Nullsoft
developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
system, dubbed
Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
Gnutella was unveiled
in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
feared
the program
would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
merger with
Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
software's
source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
a
peer-to-peer
land grab that has yet to subside.
But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
the
freely available
Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
but
always
escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
unsanctioned
release of WASTE
-- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
threatened
to resign
after AOL
removed WASTE
, but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
San
Francisco
offices in December 2003.
With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
700 additional layoffs
planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
supporting acquisitions
such as Winamp.
Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
their accomplishments.
Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
60
million
users per month.
After a disappointing
Winamp3
, Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
long-standing goals
with the release of
Winamp 5.0
in late 2003.
Nullsoft's
Shoutcast
, which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
Net's
best secret
by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
accounting for
70 million hours of listening each month.
For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
thriving
product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
software, Winamp
seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
Sonique
, after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
stagnated for
years, and development ceased altogether last March.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you have eliminated the impossible.
whatever remains, however improbable,
must be the truth.
*** END FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
Regards Steve,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype:  steve1963
MSN Messenger:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Marty Rimpau
Hi, Gary, just because development may stop on winamp, doesn't mean we
have to stop using it, the same thing has happened to my email program,
and I will still use it no matter what.  
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:26:09 -0500, Gary Wood wrote:

It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they 
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if we 
can use it.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


 *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
 On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
 nullsoft
 company?  amazing! just amazing!

 If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
 does
 one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
 company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
 this.
 something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.

 ... goodness, one more thing! grin.

From an article on the Betanews site:
 Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
 By
 Nate Mook
 , BetaNews
 November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
 The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
 and
 the door
 has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
 Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
 audio
 player with
 minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
 \
 Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
 say
 the software
 has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
 Winamp creator
 Justin Frankel last January.
 The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
 AOL
 acquired
 the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
 Winamp developers
 was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
 rebellion.
 Although
 Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
 the
 two ideologies
 collided.
 Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
 coffee and
 bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
 fellow
 Nullsoft
 developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
 system, dubbed
 Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
 Gnutella was unveiled
 in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
 feared
 the program
 would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
 merger with
 Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
 software's
 source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
 a
 peer-to-peer
 land grab that has yet to subside.
 But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
 the
 freely available
 Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
 but
 always
 escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
 However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
 unsanctioned
 release of WASTE
 -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
 threatened
 to resign
 after AOL
 removed WASTE
 , but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
 Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
 San
 Francisco
 offices in December 2003.
 With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
 700 additional layoffs
 planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
 supporting acquisitions
 such as Winamp.
 Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
 their accomplishments.
 Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
 60
 million
 users per month.
 After a disappointing
 Winamp3
 , Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
 long-standing goals
 with the release of
 Winamp 5.0
 in late 2003.
 Nullsoft's
 Shoutcast
 , which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
 Net's
 best secret
 by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
 accounting for
 70 million hours of listening each month.
 For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
 thriving
 product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
 But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
 software, Winamp
 seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
 Sonique
 , after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
 stagnated for
 years, and development ceased altogether last March.
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 When you have eliminated the impossible.
 whatever remains, however improbable,
 must be the truth.
 *** END FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***

 Regards Steve,
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Skype:  steve1963
 MSN

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread ptusing
Are people writing AOL?
I am serious..  I was amazed during oneo f the Nine Eleven fundraisers
hosted by AOL that oone of their  telephone volunteers knew all about the
legitimate compalints by blind people about AOL.
I am willing to write and  call on this issue.


- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


 It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they
 stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if
we
 can use it.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
 Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


  *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
  On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
  nullsoft
  company?  amazing! just amazing!
 
  If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
  does
  one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
  company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
  this.
  something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
 
  ... goodness, one more thing! grin.
 
 From an article on the Betanews site:
  Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
  By
  Nate Mook
  , BetaNews
  November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
  The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
  and
  the door
  has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
  Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
  audio
  player with
  minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
  \
  Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
  say
  the software
  has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
  Winamp creator
  Justin Frankel last January.
  The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
  AOL
  acquired
  the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
  Winamp developers
  was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
  rebellion.
  Although
  Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
  the
  two ideologies
  collided.
  Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
  coffee and
  bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
  fellow
  Nullsoft
  developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
  system, dubbed
  Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
  Gnutella was unveiled
  in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
  feared
  the program
  would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
  merger with
  Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
  software's
  source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
  a
  peer-to-peer
  land grab that has yet to subside.
  But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
  the
  freely available
  Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
  but
  always
  escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
  However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
  unsanctioned
  release of WASTE
  -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
  threatened
  to resign
  after AOL
  removed WASTE
  , but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
  Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
  San
  Francisco
  offices in December 2003.
  With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
  700 additional layoffs
  planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
  supporting acquisitions
  such as Winamp.
  Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
  their accomplishments.
  Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
  60
  million
  users per month.
  After a disappointing
  Winamp3
  , Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
  long-standing goals
  with the release of
  Winamp 5.0
  in late 2003.
  Nullsoft's
  Shoutcast
  , which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
  Net's
  best secret
  by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
  accounting for
  70 million hours of listening each month.
  For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
  thriving
  product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
  But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
  software, Winamp
  seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
  Sonique
  , after Lycos saw the departure

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Gary Wood
Hi Marty.  That's what I plan on doing.
- Original Message - 
From: Marty Rimpau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


Hi, Gary, just because development may stop on winamp, doesn't mean we
have to stop using it, the same thing has happened to my email program,
and I will still use it no matter what.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:26:09 -0500, Gary Wood wrote:
It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if 
we
can use it.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


*** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
nullsoft
company?  amazing! just amazing!
If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
does
one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
this.
something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
... goodness, one more thing! grin.
From an article on the Betanews site:
Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
By
Nate Mook
, BetaNews
November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
and
the door
has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
audio
player with
minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
\
Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
say
the software
has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
Winamp creator
Justin Frankel last January.
The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
AOL
acquired
the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
Winamp developers
was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
rebellion.
Although
Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
the
two ideologies
collided.
Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
coffee and
bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
fellow
Nullsoft
developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
system, dubbed
Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
Gnutella was unveiled
in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
feared
the program
would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
merger with
Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
software's
source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
a
peer-to-peer
land grab that has yet to subside.
But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
the
freely available
Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
but
always
escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
unsanctioned
release of WASTE
-- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
threatened
to resign
after AOL
removed WASTE
, but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
San
Francisco
offices in December 2003.
With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
700 additional layoffs
planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
supporting acquisitions
such as Winamp.
Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
their accomplishments.
Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
60
million
users per month.
After a disappointing
Winamp3
, Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
long-standing goals
with the release of
Winamp 5.0
in late 2003.
Nullsoft's
Shoutcast
, which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
Net's
best secret
by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
accounting for
70 million hours of listening each month.
For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
thriving
product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
software, Winamp
seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
Sonique
, after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
stagnated for
years, and development ceased altogether last March.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you have eliminated the impossible.
whatever remains, however improbable,
must be the truth.
*** END

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Gary Wood
It may be a good idea to write AOL, but as Marty stated, even if they don't 
make future versions of Winamp, we can still get the benefits of using the 
latest versions we have now.
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


   Are people writing AOL?
I am serious..  I was amazed during oneo f the Nine Eleven fundraisers
hosted by AOL that oone of their  telephone volunteers knew all about the
legitimate compalints by blind people about AOL.
I am willing to write and  call on this issue.
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If 
they
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if
we
can use it.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp

 *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
 On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
 nullsoft
 company?  amazing! just amazing!

 If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
 does
 one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
 company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
 this.
 something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.

 ... goodness, one more thing! grin.

From an article on the Betanews site:
 Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
 By
 Nate Mook
 , BetaNews
 November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
 The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
 and
 the door
 has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
 Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
 audio
 player with
 minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
 \
 Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
 say
 the software
 has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
 Winamp creator
 Justin Frankel last January.
 The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
 AOL
 acquired
 the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
 Winamp developers
 was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
 rebellion.
 Although
 Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
 the
 two ideologies
 collided.
 Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
 coffee and
 bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
 fellow
 Nullsoft
 developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
 system, dubbed
 Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
 Gnutella was unveiled
 in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
 feared
 the program
 would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
 merger with
 Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
 software's
 source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
 a
 peer-to-peer
 land grab that has yet to subside.
 But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
 the
 freely available
 Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
 but
 always
 escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
 However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
 unsanctioned
 release of WASTE
 -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
 threatened
 to resign
 after AOL
 removed WASTE
 , but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
 Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
 San
 Francisco
 offices in December 2003.
 With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
 700 additional layoffs
 planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
 supporting acquisitions
 such as Winamp.
 Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
 their accomplishments.
 Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
 60
 million
 users per month.
 After a disappointing
 Winamp3
 , Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
 long-standing goals
 with the release of
 Winamp 5.0
 in late 2003.
 Nullsoft's
 Shoutcast
 , which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
 Net's
 best secret
 by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
 accounting for
 70 million hours of listening each month.
 For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
 thriving
 product that AOL continues

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Dane Trethowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It will be interesting to see what may happen to the Shoutcast servers, will
ACBI be affected for instance?
At 04:18 AM 11/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi, Gary, just because development may stop on winamp, doesn't mean we
have to stop using it, the same thing has happened to my email program,
and I will still use it no matter what.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 11:26:09 -0500, Gary Wood wrote:
It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if we
can use it.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


 *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
 On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
 nullsoft
 company?  amazing! just amazing!

 If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
 does
 one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
 company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
 this.
 something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.

 ... goodness, one more thing! grin.

From an article on the Betanews site:
 Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
 By
 Nate Mook
 , BetaNews
 November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
 The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
 and
 the door
 has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
 Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
 audio
 player with
 minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
 \
 Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
 say
 the software
 has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
 Winamp creator
 Justin Frankel last January.
 The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
 AOL
 acquired
 the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
 Winamp developers
 was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
 rebellion.
 Although
 Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
 the
 two ideologies
 collided.
 Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
 coffee and
 bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
 fellow
 Nullsoft
 developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
 system, dubbed
 Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
 Gnutella was unveiled
 in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
 feared
 the program
 would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
 merger with
 Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
 software's
 source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
 a
 peer-to-peer
 land grab that has yet to subside.
 But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
 the
 freely available
 Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
 but
 always
 escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
 However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
 unsanctioned
 release of WASTE
 -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
 threatened
 to resign
 after AOL
 removed WASTE
 , but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
 Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
 San
 Francisco
 offices in December 2003.
 With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
 700 additional layoffs
 planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
 supporting acquisitions
 such as Winamp.
 Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
 their accomplishments.
 Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
 60
 million
 users per month.
 After a disappointing
 Winamp3
 , Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
 long-standing goals
 with the release of
 Winamp 5.0
 in late 2003.
 Nullsoft's
 Shoutcast
 , which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
 Net's
 best secret
 by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
 accounting for
 70 million hours of listening each month.
 For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
 thriving
 product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
 But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
 software, Winamp
 seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
 Sonique
 , after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
 stagnated for
 years, and development ceased altogether last March.
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 When you have eliminated the impossible

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Rocker
Ya!  And what if they take the Library away?

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if we
can use it.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


 *** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
 On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
 nullsoft
 company?  amazing! just amazing!

 If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
 does
 one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
 company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
 this.
 something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.

 ... goodness, one more thing! grin.

From an article on the Betanews site:
 Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
 By
 Nate Mook
 , BetaNews
 November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
 The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
 and
 the door
 has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
 Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
 audio
 player with
 minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
 \
 Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
 say
 the software
 has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
 Winamp creator
 Justin Frankel last January.
 The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
 AOL
 acquired
 the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
 Winamp developers
 was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
 rebellion.
 Although
 Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
 the
 two ideologies
 collided.
 Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
 coffee and
 bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
 fellow
 Nullsoft
 developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
 system, dubbed
 Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
 Gnutella was unveiled
 in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
 feared
 the program
 would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
 merger with
 Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
 software's
 source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
 a
 peer-to-peer
 land grab that has yet to subside.
 But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
 the
 freely available
 Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
 but
 always
 escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
 However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
 unsanctioned
 release of WASTE
 -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
 threatened
 to resign
 after AOL
 removed WASTE
 , but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
 Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
 San
 Francisco
 offices in December 2003.
 With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
 700 additional layoffs
 planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
 supporting acquisitions
 such as Winamp.
 Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
 their accomplishments.
 Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
 60
 million
 users per month.
 After a disappointing
 Winamp3
 , Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
 long-standing goals
 with the release of
 Winamp 5.0
 in late 2003.
 Nullsoft's
 Shoutcast
 , which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
 Net's
 best secret
 by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
 accounting for
 70 million hours of listening each month.
 For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
 thriving
 product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
 But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
 software, Winamp
 seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
 Sonique
 , after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
 stagnated for
 years, and development ceased altogether last March.
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 When you have eliminated the impossible.
 whatever remains, however improbable,
 must be the truth.
 *** END FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***

 Regards Steve,
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Skype:  steve1963
 MSN Messenger

Re: The Future of Winamp

2004-11-13 Thread Gary Wood
Well that would be too bad if they, in fact, were to take the library away.
- Original Message - 
From: Rocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp


Ya!  And what if they take the Library away?
- Original Message - 
From: Gary Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: The Future of Winamp

It's too bad this is happening to one of the best players around.  If they
stop development of Winamp, we'll just have to keep the one we've got, if 
we
can use it.
- Original Message - 
From: Steve Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Future of Winamp


*** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE  ***
On 11/11/2004 at 3:44 PM geoff chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check this out, AOL pays 100 million dollars for this one little
nullsoft
company?  amazing! just amazing!
If anyone would like to educate me as to how one little program that
does
one little job, could possibly become worth, such a huge figure to one
company to pay, to acquire another, I'd reeally love to understand
this.
something about the world I just don't get here yet obviously.
... goodness, one more thing! grin.
From an article on the Betanews site:
Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp
By
Nate Mook
, BetaNews
November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM
The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL
and
the door
has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.
Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital
audio
player with
minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.
\
Winamp's demise comes as no surprise to those close to the company who
say
the software
has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and
Winamp creator
Justin Frankel last January.
The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After
AOL
acquired
the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of
Winamp developers
was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for
rebellion.
Although
Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until
the
two ideologies
collided.
Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over
coffee and
bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and
fellow
Nullsoft
developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing
system, dubbed
Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.
Gnutella was unveiled
in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives
feared
the program
would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending
merger with
Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the
software's
source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting
a
peer-to-peer
land grab that has yet to subside.
But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from
the
freely available
Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times,
but
always
escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.
However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft's
unsanctioned
release of WASTE
-- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel
threatened
to resign
after AOL
removed WASTE
, but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.
Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's
San
Francisco
offices in December 2003.
With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and
700 additional layoffs
planned for next month, the company's focus has shifted away from
supporting acquisitions
such as Winamp.
Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of
their accomplishments.
Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible
60
million
users per month.
After a disappointing
Winamp3
, Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed
long-standing goals
with the release of
Winamp 5.0
in late 2003.
Nullsoft's
Shoutcast
, which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called the
Net's
best secret
by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users
accounting for
70 million hours of listening each month.
For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is a
thriving
product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support.
But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the
software, Winamp
seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player
Sonique
, after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has
stagnated for
years, and development ceased altogether last March.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you have eliminated the impossible.
whatever remains, however improbable,
must