Hi Haomian,
Thanks for the update and for taking my comments into consideration.
Just a few more issues -
(1) Please fix the format of the table in Section 9.5 -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls#section-9.5
If you look at our IANA registry -
https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-error-object ; the
meaning is associated with Error-Type (which is already defined) and the
Error-value includes the value and meaning.
A reference on how to format the table -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9168#section-10.4
(2) Line spacing issue in RBNF in appendix
There is a mix of double line space and single space. Please make it a
single space everywhere.
The tab formatting is also not aligned inside the RBNF.
(3) List formatting in Section 6.1 is broken for END-POINTS
(4) Copyright Notice says Simplified BSD, it should be Revised BSD. See
https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/trust-legal-provisions/tlp-5/
(5) A general formatting pass of the I-D
Please update the document one more time and I will start working on the
Shepherd report after that.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:04 AM Zhenghaomian wrote:
> Hi, WG,
>
> We updated the draft according to the comments from shepherd review (in
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/lxZjj0jUvRHcorh1admITW67sT8/ ),
> and we think it's ready to be proceeded to the next step, thanks.
>
> Best wishes,
> Haomian (on behalf of authors & contributors)
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> 发送时间: 2022年6月16日 11:12
> 收件人: Zhenghaomian ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios <
> oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>; Oscar de Dios <
> oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com>; Victor Lopez ;
> Young Lee ; Zafar Ali
> 主题: New Version Notification for
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Name: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls
> Revision: 18
> Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
> Extensions for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-controlled Networks
> Document date: 2022-06-16
> Group: pce
> Pages: 25
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls/
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-18
>
> Abstract:
>The PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) has been extended to support
>stateful PCE functions where the Stateful PCE maintains information
>about paths and resource usage within a network, but these
>extensions do not cover all requirements for GMPLS networks.
>
>This document provides extensions required for PCEP so as to enable
>the usage of a stateful PCE capability in GMPLS-controlled networks.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
