Re: Finally back (webhost chronicles)

2008-03-06 Thread Cotty
On 5/3/08, John Celio, discombobulated, unleashed:

That's it from me, for the moment.  Sorry if I bored anyone with my little 
update.

Hi John. Not  boring at all :)

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread Cotty
On 5/3/08, Owen LaPrath, discombobulated, unleashed:

I am kicking myself for ever having wanted a K10.
Autofocus was a dissapoinmtent to say the least - no faster than the K100, 
and actually less reliable!
After seeing a few K20d shots from Dubai, my K100d even compares favorably 
for high ISO shots at iso3200, which I do a lot of. The problem is the very 
annoying banding - banding looks much worse than grit.
My K100d still is just dandy and works like new after about 18 months or so.
Then I bought 2 bad K10d in a row from 2 different sellers.
The first was DOA. On the second body the Antishake switch simply fell off 
after 4 months with a stress crack. The switch is a very poor design, as the 
switch axle is plastic and is attached with a screw into that axle from the 
inside of the body. It is also just held in place by friction, so after 2 
months I started to have problems with it getting a bit flaky in activating 
antishake. I have read about major injection molding problems with the K10d 
in several forums by now. There are documented cases of the bottom plates 
chipping and cracking. And the K20d has the same body  hm .
Then I saw my lens collection, the fact that the trusty old K100d will not 
be continued, and snagged the very last K100d Super body in my local store 
here in Tacoma (Washington State, USA) to have a backup body.
That was a lot cheaper than switching systems :)
Frankly, I like the colors and exposure of the K100d MUCH better than 
anything I got out of the K10d.
The K100d also doesn't have the banding issues that randomly plagued my 
K10d.
Frankly, with the K20d being the 9th Pentax dSLR model, autofocus, 
underexposure issues (the Dubai shots are UGLY), high ISO noise, and high 
ISO banding ought not to be a problem. Yet they are.

Basil Fawlty
Other than that it's okay though is it?



-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Peter Fairweather
Here goes, not all these answers are serious ;)

Peter

On 06/03/2008, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front 
 back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?

Not before you have upgraded to the model after next

  2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
 significantly smaller in the hand.]

Small used to be a USP for Pentax, replaced by mega megapixels

  3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tractable?

Yes. DNG is the pretence of a plaform free format


  4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
 toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
 porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close up?

Don't know. Have you checked the child?


  5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
 playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?

I prefer RAW when lighting is tricky. The button comes in handy!


  6. Am I going to need to buy a Power Mac to process large numbers of
 photos in Lightroom without making my computer wheeze audibly?

The desire by us to have higher quality makes this inevitable


  7. Am I going to have to use the software that came with the camera?

Apparently it's not too bad but all the current Abode products will be
upgraded anyway. If you are on an old version of PS - tough!!

  8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
 stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?

Not on a tripod

  9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
 all the time or JPEG all the time?

No

 10. What do other people put on the User setting?

I'm still struggling with the standard setting on my K10


 11. What's the smart way to use the Live View option?

Pass, I can't see the back of the camera and the subject without
looking over the top of my glasses. The terrific optical viewfinder
was a major attraction of the DS when I initially went digital.


 12. Why does the shutter noise have to be so loud?

Because the upgraded shutter and autofocus is the for the next big
(expensive) model

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If a K10D file is 16 megabytes, and a K20D file is 23 megabytes, that
  corresponds roughly to the difference between 10 megapixels and 14.6
  megapixels. Right?
  Paul

But consider the difference n .pef file sizes. A K10D's .pef file is
around the 10-12MB mark, while the K20D's are around 20-23MB.

I don't know why the files are twice the size, but I'm guessing that
they are not compressed.

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
Okay, granted. If the camera is way off then overall focus correction  
is an advantage. But I consider that a quality control problem that  
users shouldn't have to deal with. Being able to set lens specific  
focus, on the other hand, is a valuable end-user feature.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Rick Womer wrote:

 I disagree, Paul.  I was having a significant
 backfocusing problem on my K10D with all my lenses,
 which I corrected using the hacked firmware
 available on the web.  Now things focus =much= better,
 though there is still a tiny variation between lenses.
  I could not have done my recent macro shooting
 without having corrected the focus.

 Rick

 --- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think focus adjustment is somewhat useless if it's
 not lens
 specific like that of the K20D.
 Paul


 http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW



 __ 
 __
 Be a better friend, newshound, and
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http:// 
 mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
K20D high ISO a problem? LOL. You apparently haven't seen any of the  
recently posted pics. And there are thousands of very satisfied K10D  
users, including myself. I shoot lots of low-light photography, and I  
never experienced banding.
Paul

On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Owen LaPrath wrote:

 All I can say is:
 I am kicking myself for ever having wanted a K10.
 Autofocus was a dissapoinmtent to say the least - no faster than  
 the K100,
 and actually less reliable!
 After seeing a few K20d shots from Dubai, my K100d even compares  
 favorably
 for high ISO shots at iso3200, which I do a lot of. The problem is  
 the very
 annoying banding - banding looks much worse than grit.
 My K100d still is just dandy and works like new after about 18  
 months or so.
 Then I bought 2 bad K10d in a row from 2 different sellers.
 The first was DOA. On the second body the Antishake switch simply  
 fell off
 after 4 months with a stress crack. The switch is a very poor  
 design, as the
 switch axle is plastic and is attached with a screw into that axle  
 from the
 inside of the body. It is also just held in place by friction, so  
 after 2
 months I started to have problems with it getting a bit flaky in  
 activating
 antishake. I have read about major injection molding problems with  
 the K10d
 in several forums by now. There are documented cases of the bottom  
 plates
 chipping and cracking. And the K20d has the same body   
 hm .
 Then I saw my lens collection, the fact that the trusty old K100d  
 will not
 be continued, and snagged the very last K100d Super body in my  
 local store
 here in Tacoma (Washington State, USA) to have a backup body.
 That was a lot cheaper than switching systems :)
 Frankly, I like the colors and exposure of the K100d MUCH better than
 anything I got out of the K10d.
 The K100d also doesn't have the banding issues that randomly  
 plagued my
 K10d.
 Frankly, with the K20d being the 9th Pentax dSLR model, autofocus,
 underexposure issues (the Dubai shots are UGLY), high ISO noise,  
 and high
 ISO banding ought not to be a problem. Yet they are.

 I hope Pentax reads these forums, because here is one user who  
 would rather
 buy a good old used and proven model rather than new goods that  
 keep the
 company and paychecks for Pentax going :)

 later
 Owen


 - Original Message -
 From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Wednesday, 05 March, 2008 18:11
 Subject: Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results


 If you're noticing it, it's off by a bunch. I don't know why Pentax
 didn't adjust it properly. The adjustments I'm talking about here are
 really fine tuning. I did notice the front focus on the FA 50/1.4,
 which was off by -4 on the K20 scale. The other lenses seemed fine
 before checking.
 Paul
 On Mar 5, 2008, at 7:37 PM, David J Brooks wrote:

 Hum.

 My K10D still does what i sent it in for, my Nikons are fine, what
 gives.

 Davethe directions.


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
Yep. That's the kind of high ISO performance everyone can expect. But  
some here apparently are placing more weight on the Dubai pictures  
that were made with pre-release firmware. Strange logic. BTW, I find  
ACR's default settings are not very accurate in terms of color  
temperature with the K20D. But that's to be expected when working  
with DNG files from a new camera.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:37 PM, William Robb wrote:

 I didn't do well today, but I did something.

 The top picture is shot at ISO6400!!
 With a 100% detail shot below.

 The studio thing was a 30 second light set-up shot at iso 800,  
 because i am a dork sometimes.
 Below it is a 100% detail as well.
 None of the images recieved any post processing, other than the  
 default settings in camera, and
 default settings in ACR. No sharpening, or levels or anything.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/k20/K20_page1.html

 The EXIF data is on the full frame shots, but

 the top picture is shot with the 77mm lens, 1/50th sec at f/2.5,  
 ISO 6400.

 The portrait is with the 77mm lens, 1/160th sec at f/11, ISO 800.

 The page is 760K.

 Enjoy

 William Robb


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: March PUG is up

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 5/3/08, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:

  http://pug.komkon.org/

  Superb gallery - outright best for me is Leaf Skeleton by David Dixon.

  The rest are excellent.

  And Daddy has a nice girl :)

I agree. 3 thumbs up.

Cheers,

Dave :-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment result

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
I tested the DA 16-45 at about 40mm, f4. At some point, I'll check it  
at 16 or 20mm as well. I have only checked it at one distance. But  
after reading your post, I did check infinity focus by eye and found  
it correct insofar as a normal visible check colud determine. Since  
the focus adjustment for this lens was only one point on the scale,  
I'm not worried about basing it on a single test for now. But I will  
follow up. When the FA 50/1.4 required a -4 adjustment, I checked it  
at two distances -- about five feet from target and ten feet from  
target. The -4 adjustment proved correct at both distances. I suspect  
that will prove true for other lenses as well. I would never even  
have started this except for the fact that the FA 50 showed  
noticeable front focus. I suspect it was doing the same thing with  
the K10 but I didn't notice or attributed it to user error. Some day  
I'll check it on that camera. But, for the most part, I'm too busy  
taking pictures to spend a lot of time fiddling with hardware.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:58 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:

 Paul, thanks for the report. Do you mind a couple of questions?

 For the DA 16-45, did you test the adjustments at more than one focal
 length? Or just one (which one?)? How did that work?

 Secondly, I assume you are shooting your chart at not too great a
 distance. Does this give you the results you want for all distances?

 Joe

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front 
  back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?

Dunno

   2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
  significantly smaller in the hand.]

Dunno

   3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tractable?

The .pef files are around 21MB

   4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
  toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
  porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close up?

Again, dunno. (it kinda bugs me too)

   5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
  playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?

I haven't seen that

   6. Am I going to need to buy a Power Mac to process large numbers of
  photos in Lightroom without making my computer wheeze audibly?

Get a PC. It'll be cheaper.

   7. Am I going to have to use the software that came with the camera?

Only with high ISO (and only until adobe brings out an ACR update)

   8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
  stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?

Well it's not needed when you use a tripod is it?

   9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
  all the time or JPEG all the time?

While I understand the sentiment I can appreceate why some find it usefull.

  10. What do other people put on the User setting?

I don't use it.

  11. What's the smart way to use the Live View option?

With a tripod.

  12. Why does the shutter noise have to be so loud?

Pick up a 6x7  fire of a few shots. That's loud.

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Need help with maritime terminology

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
This is a capstan:

http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1913.jpg

This is a capstan  a ships bollard:

http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP1531%20copy.jpg

(please excuse the crappy colour)

Cheers,

Dave

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Or capstan
  Regards
  Jens
  -Oprindelig meddelelse-
  Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
  Doug Brewer
  Sendt: 5. marts 2008 19:52
  Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  Emne: Re: Need help with maritime terminology




  looks like a cleat

  AlunFoto wrote:
   Dear gang,
   Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
   thingy in this image?
  
   http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Farewell your Majesty

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
Thanks Jack.

I think you may be right, this shot will work better as part of a series.

Stay tuned I may put a small GESO together.

Cheers,

Dave

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Like it. You know there are going to be comments regarding the
  centering thing, but, in this case, that isn't an issue for me.
  It is an image, however, that will benefit from an explanation. ;)

  Jack


 --- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2143/2312505644_1223c683d5_o.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K10D focus test shot

2008-03-06 Thread David J Brooks
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7024445

Here is the head shot.
Focus point is on her left eye.
DA 50 F2.8 at f2.8

No PS as is from camera.

Dave

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:27 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7024435

  Focus point is on the blue light. The yellow light is more in focus.
  When i focused on the yellow light, the one behind is in focus. F 2.8
  used.

  I did some test shots, head shots of the SO and they are fine at f2.8.

  Looks like if it has enough to focus on, it does, but

  Dave

  --
  Equine Photography
  www.caughtinmotion.com
  http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
  Ontario Canada




-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Farewell your Majesty

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Really great colours and I like the way the old girl is heading off into the 
 sunset (literally and metaphorically)

Thanks. They timed the departure quite nicely.

  But I'm going to be picky.

Oh gawd...here we go.

;-)

 The horizon slopes to the right just slightly but noticeably and the centre 
 is very cluttered with all of those small boats.  Probably wouldn't be so 
 noticeable if the ship was larger in the frame.  Seems as if it wouldn't be a 
 big task to clone most or some of them out (but then it wouldn't be an 
 accurate image, I suppose!)

It must be the engineer in you, because I didn't even notice the
slight tilt :-) When I get around to it I'll straighten it out

As for the clutter, it would be a more powerful image without it, but
as a record of the event it's necessary IMO. However I did take some
artistic licence with the colour of the sky  water.

It was quite a festive atmosphere. The local Port authority was
handing out Aussie flags to all comers  as she was sailing past
someone on board started up the Aussie, Aussie, Aussie... chant :-)

Thanks for your comments.

Cheers,

Dave



  Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2143/2312505644_1223c683d5_o.jpg

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread David J Brooks
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I disagree, Paul.  I was having a significant
  backfocusing problem on my K10D with all my lenses,
  which I corrected using the hacked firmware
  available on the web.  Now things focus =much= better,
  though there is still a tiny variation between lenses.
   I could not have done my recent macro shooting
  without having corrected the focus.

This is were i am noticing my K10D problem.

Back it goes to have them look again'
'

Dave

  Rick


  --- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I think focus adjustment is somewhat useless if it's
   not lens
   specific like that of the K20D.
   Paul


  http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW



   
 
  Be a better friend, newshound, and
  know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ




  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.




-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: March PUG is up

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:32 AM, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wow, thanks!
  I totally wasn't expecting anybody to like it much.
  CW

Well if it makes you feel better, I don't think much of it.


= kidding ==

:-)

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


K10D focus test shot

2008-03-06 Thread David J Brooks
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7024435

Focus point is on the blue light. The yellow light is more in focus.
When i focused on the yellow light, the one behind is in focus. F 2.8
used.

I did some test shots, head shots of the SO and they are fine at f2.8.

Looks like if it has enough to focus on, it does, but

Dave

-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That's banding?

Yes it is.

 Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal
  viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at
  1600. But to each their own.
  Paul

It's clearly visible at the normal view so it's not a good thing.

Cheers,

Dave

 On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Owen LaPrath wrote:

   The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots
   starting at
   iso1600.
   I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
   Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
  
   later
   Owen

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
That's banding? HAR! Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal  
viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at  
1600. But to each their own.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Owen LaPrath wrote:

 The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots  
 starting at
 iso1600.
 I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
 Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)

 later
 Owen

 - Original Message -
 From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Sent: Wednesday, 05 March, 2008 19:37
 Subject: K20D pictures


 I didn't do well today, but I did something.

 The top picture is shot at ISO6400!!
 With a 100% detail shot below.

 The studio thing was a 30 second light set-up shot at iso 800,  
 because i am
 a dork sometimes.
 Below it is a 100% detail as well.
 None of the images recieved any post processing, other than the  
 default
 settings in camera, and
 default settings in ACR. No sharpening, or levels or anything.

 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/k20/K20_page1.html

 The EXIF data is on the full frame shots, but

 the top picture is shot with the 77mm lens, 1/50th sec at f/2.5,  
 ISO 6400.

 The portrait is with the 77mm lens, 1/160th sec at f/11, ISO 800.

 The page is 760K.

 Enjoy

 William Robb


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread Paul Stenquist
I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from  
the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in  
the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the  
image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at  
6400 would probably end up as BW.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, David Savage wrote:

 On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That's banding?

 Yes it is.

 Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal
  viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at
  1600. But to each their own.
  Paul

 It's clearly visible at the normal view so it's not a good thing.

 Cheers,

 Dave

 On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Owen LaPrath wrote:

 The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots
 starting at
 iso1600.
 I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
 Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)

 later
 Owen

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread Adam Maas
I can't see any banding in the normal view and a bare hint of it at
100%. The 6400 output looks just as good as the excellent output from
my D300.

-Adam

On 3/6/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
  the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
  the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
  image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at
  6400 would probably end up as BW.
  Paul
  On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, David Savage wrote:

   On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   That's banding?
  
   Yes it is.

 
   Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal
viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at
1600. But to each their own.
Paul
  

  It's clearly visible at the normal view so it's not a good thing.
  
   Cheers,
  
   Dave

 
   On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:59 PM, Owen LaPrath wrote:
  
   The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots
   starting at
   iso1600.
   I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
   Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
  
   later
   Owen
  
   --

  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
   PDML@pdml.net
   http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
   to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
   and follow the directions.


  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K10D focus test shot

2008-03-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
I did the quick and dirty 45 degree shot of text with the FA 50 at f1.4.
 With 12 point double spacing, the focus is best on the line above the
chosen one.  The chosen text is in acceptable focus, however.  I can see
cases where it could be a problem, but now that I know I'll be sure to
check and maybe even bracket focus a bit after checking the  screen.






Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/6/2008 7:27 AM 
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7024435 

Focus point is on the blue light. The yellow light is more in focus.
When i focused on the yellow light, the one behind is in focus. F 2.8
used.

I did some test shots, head shots of the SO and they are fine at f2.8.

Looks like if it has enough to focus on, it does, but

Dave

-- 
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com 
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ 
Ontario Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net 
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

!SIG:47cfe465241441572851132!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results


 K20D high ISO a problem? LOL. You apparently haven't seen any of the
 recently posted pics. And there are thousands of very satisfied K10D
 users, including myself. I shoot lots of low-light photography, and I
 never experienced banding.

I suspect Owen spends a lot of time with the hand wringers over at DPReview, 
rather than with 
people who use their cameras to take pictures.
My K20 has the Nikon boys over at the studio drooling.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: K20D pictures


 Odd.

 On the normal view, in the LHS shadow detail is sticks out like
 proverbial to me.

 Bill it's your shot. Are you seeing the same thing?


Very slightly,  don't find it objectionable, and I suspect treating the area 
with Neat Image or 
some such would fix it nicely, and I doubt very much that it would show up in 
print. Even so, 
it's WAY out of the sensors range, so the equipment is being pushed pretty hard.
I'd buy the camera based on this rather than eschew it, if high ISO stuff was 
my gig.

William Robb



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
Odd.

On the normal view, in the LHS shadow detail is sticks out like
proverbial to me.

Bill it's your shot. Are you seeing the same thing?

Cheers,

Dave

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I can't see any banding in the normal view and a bare hint of it at
  100%. The 6400 output looks just as good as the excellent output from
  my D300.

  -Adam



  On 3/6/08, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at
6400 would probably end up as BW.
Paul
On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:44 AM, David Savage wrote:
  
 On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That's banding?

 Yes it is.
  
   
 Maybe at pixel peeping levels, but not at normal
  viewing size and distance. And a K100d pic is far noiser, even at
  1600. But to each their own.
  Paul

  
It's clearly visible at the normal view so it's not a good thing.

 Cheers,

 Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
William Robb wrote:
 - Original Message - 
 From: Paul Stenquist
 Subject: Re: K20D pictures
 
 
 I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
 the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
 the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
 image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at
 6400 would probably end up as BW.
 
 There is some banding visible in the darker areas, but I figure that at ISO 
 6400, those areas 
 are probably about 8 stops or more out of range of the sensor.
 This makes the image one of those torture tests that is pretty much 
 guaranteed to bring out 
 flaws.
 In a similar image made at 3200 (7 stops out of range), the banding is very 
 minimal, at 800ISO 
 (6 stops out of range), it is gone, as much as I can see.
 http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/k20/K20_page2.html (500k page)
 Is the technology perfect?
 I guess not, but it's pretty darned good.
 
 William Robb 
 
 
That second photo looks pretty darn good.  I'm not sure how some of the 
others couldn't see the banding in the 6400 example.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K10D focus test shot

2008-03-06 Thread Charles Robinson
On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:23, Steve Desjardins wrote:
  but now that I know I'll be sure to
 check and maybe even bracket focus a bit after checking the  screen.


Now that would be an interesting extended bracketing feature - focus  
bracketing!

(only kinda kidding)

  -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: K20D pictures


 I'm missing it. I like the results shown here. I recall examples from
 the *istD that showed clear multicolored banding at long exposures in
 the dark. If there's anything here it doesn't get in the way of the
 image. At least not for me. Although anything I'm going to shoot at
 6400 would probably end up as BW.

There is some banding visible in the darker areas, but I figure that at ISO 
6400, those areas 
are probably about 8 stops or more out of range of the sensor.
This makes the image one of those torture tests that is pretty much guaranteed 
to bring out 
flaws.
In a similar image made at 3200 (7 stops out of range), the banding is very 
minimal, at 800ISO 
(6 stops out of range), it is gone, as much as I can see.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/k20/K20_page2.html (500k page)
Is the technology perfect?
I guess not, but it's pretty darned good.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K10D focus test shot

2008-03-06 Thread Mark Roberts
Charles Robinson wrote:
 On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:23, Steve Desjardins wrote:
  but now that I know I'll be sure to
 check and maybe even bracket focus a bit after checking the  screen.
 
 Now that would be an interesting extended bracketing feature - focus  
 bracketing!
 
 (only kinda kidding)

Contax actually did that.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


GESO: See ya 'Liz

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
G'day All,

I've put together a small 4 image gallery to put last nights PESO into
a bit more context (~490kb page)

http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_016/index.htm


Cheers,

Dave


P.S

The Aussies on list might recognise the blue  yellow vessel from the
news. That's the Customs  Fisheries vessel that shadowed the Japanese
whaling fleet.

P.P.S.

Brian, that shot was out 0.38 degrees ;-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread Rick Womer
The PEF files on the K10D are compressed, and the size
varies with the amount of detail in the image.

The K10D DNG files are not compressed, and are
consistent in size.

I don't know whether the DNGs in the K20D are
compressed or not.

Rick

--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Paul Stenquist wrote:
  If a K10D file is 16 megabytes, and a K20D file is
 23 megabytes, that  
  corresponds roughly to the difference between 10
 megapixels and 14.6  
  megapixels. Right?
 
 Yeah, but the K10D file had a small JPG in it, too,
 which made those 
 file sizes variable as well.  If they were pure RAW
 files, they would 
 all be exactly the same size, barring differences in
 the way it records 
 lens and exposure information in the EXIF data.
 
 -- 
 Thanks,
 DougF (KG4LMZ)
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 


http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I don't know whether the DNGs in the K20D are
  compressed or not.

It doesn't look like it.

And if the .pefs are, there isn't much compression going on.

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread frank theriault
Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
morning commute was just a bit messy:

This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I took
it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I worked
on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:

http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d

http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg


Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:

http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg

http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b


and this:

http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx

http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg

Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
(or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...

cheers,
frank







-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO: See ya 'Liz

2008-03-06 Thread pnstenquist
Good stuff. Love the head-on bow shot. Very powerful. Great rendering. The flag 
pic is cool too. And, as usual, your panorama is excellent. In truth, I think 
last night's PESO would be my number four, but it is a very nice addition to 
the series.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 G'day All,
 
 I've put together a small 4 image gallery to put last nights PESO into
 a bit more context (~490kb page)
 
 http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_016/index.htm
 
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 
 P.S
 
 The Aussies on list might recognise the blue  yellow vessel from the
 news. That's the Customs  Fisheries vessel that shadowed the Japanese
 whaling fleet.
 
 P.P.S.
 
 Brian, that shot was out 0.38 degrees ;-)
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K10D focus test shot

2008-03-06 Thread P. J. Alling
Did you use auto focus or manual focus.  If you used auto focus all bets 
are off, the camera makes a decision.  Now that could be tweaked in 
software, (I think anyway).  If however you manually focused on the blue 
light and the yellow is in focus then you have a misaligned focusing 
screen, especially if your results are consistent.  That is something 
that should never have left the factory.

David J Brooks wrote:
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7024435

 Focus point is on the blue light. The yellow light is more in focus.
 When i focused on the yellow light, the one behind is in focus. F 2.8
 used.

 I did some test shots, head shots of the SO and they are fine at f2.8.

 Looks like if it has enough to focus on, it does, but

 Dave

   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Rick Womer
I like the bus pic!

That much snow would close schools and businesses in
Philly for a week--maybe only 3 days if it melted
immediately.

Rick

--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge
 one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in
 Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge
 accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:
 
 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty
 dark out when I took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was
 5am when I worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had
 to deal with:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d
 

http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg
 
 
 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:
 

http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b
 
 
 and this:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx
 

http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg
 
 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's
 become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...
 
 cheers,
 frank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri
 Cartier-Bresson
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
 directly above and follow the directions.
 


http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread P. J. Alling
Speaking of snow snarling traffic, I spent a year living in Atlanta.  
One of my clearest memories was sitting at my desk as a consultant at a 
large corporation, when a regular employee walked by saying ...it's 
snowing in Birmingham, (Alabama, more than two hours away at normal 
driving speeds). I'm out of here  The snow by the way melted 
immediately on hitting the streets, the evening commute took 6 hours.,  
normally it took 20 minutes.

frank theriault wrote:
 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:

 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:

 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d

 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg


 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:

 http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg

 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b


 and this:

 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx

 http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg

 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...

 cheers,
 frank







   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D pictures

2008-03-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
Thee are wonderful results.  At 6400, a usable image is a benefit; a
nice image is wonderful.  And the one at 800  is striking. 

I'm pleased with my K10D (even the JPEGS) but it's nice to know that
Pentax is actually moving forward with its camera design and producing
some nice stuff.  I really want some new lenses  but from what I've seen
here I understand the desire to go to the K20D.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


K200D 1600 ISO shot

2008-03-06 Thread Marcus A. Hofmann
Hello.

I just got my new K200D today. Didn't have much time to play with it  
yet, but I thought I'd share a quick shot. Maybe it is of interest to  
someone. ISO 1600 at f/22 with a 40 mm DA limited (pancake).

http://www.ntony.net/temp/IMGP0020.jpg (full resolution jpeg straight  
from the camera, 5 MB)


Marcus


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO: See ya 'Liz

2008-03-06 Thread Bob Sullivan
Dave,
Very nice collection...
The pano is great, amazing actually!  I want to visit!
How did you get that head on shot?  QEII on a leash with it's little helper.
Flag shot is a terrific way to set the place.
And the sunset finishes it all off.
(And I think all the other boats aren't really clutter.
Taken in context they make it more than just a cruise ship at sunset.)
Regards, Bob S.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:08 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 G'day All,

 I've put together a small 4 image gallery to put last nights PESO into
 a bit more context (~490kb page)

 http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_016/index.htm


 Cheers,

 Dave


 P.S

 The Aussies on list might recognise the blue  yellow vessel from the
 news. That's the Customs  Fisheries vessel that shadowed the Japanese
 whaling fleet.

 P.P.S.

 Brian, that shot was out 0.38 degrees ;-)

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread Bob Sullivan
Dave,
My DNG's are 23 meg, but the PEF's are 12-16 meg.
And would you believe Picasa can decode them into images.
(Hard to put much over on those Google folks.)
Regards,  Bob S.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:14 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If a K10D file is 16 megabytes, and a K20D file is 23 megabytes, that
   corresponds roughly to the difference between 10 megapixels and 14.6
   megapixels. Right?
   Paul

 But consider the difference n .pef file sizes. A K10D's .pef file is
 around the 10-12MB mark, while the K20D's are around 20-23MB.

 I don't know why the files are twice the size, but I'm guessing that
 they are not compressed.

 Cheers,

 Dave

 --

 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Jack Davis
And you folks complain about the geese? ;-))  (bu)

Jack (in California)
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:
 
 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I
 took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I
 worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d
 

http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg
 
 
 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:
 

http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b
 
 
 and this:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx
 

http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg
 
 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...
 
 cheers,
 frank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K200D 1600 ISO shot

2008-03-06 Thread Jack Davis
Maybe I don't know any better, but I'd be pleased if it were mine.

Jack
--- Marcus A. Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello.
 
 I just got my new K200D today. Didn't have much time to play with it 
 
 yet, but I thought I'd share a quick shot. Maybe it is of interest to
  
 someone. ISO 1600 at f/22 with a 40 mm DA limited (pancake).
 
 http://www.ntony.net/temp/IMGP0020.jpg (full resolution jpeg straight
  
 from the camera, 5 MB)
 
 
 Marcus
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: See ya 'Liz

2008-03-06 Thread Ken Waller
Good images all..

My fav is the pano.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GESO: See ya 'Liz


 G'day All,
 
 I've put together a small 4 image gallery to put last nights PESO into
 a bit more context (~490kb page)
 
 http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_016/index.htm
 
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave
 
 
 P.S
 
 The Aussies on list might recognise the blue  yellow vessel from the
 news. That's the Customs  Fisheries vessel that shadowed the Japanese
 whaling fleet.
 
 P.P.S.
 
 Brian, that shot was out 0.38 degrees ;-)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K200D 1600 ISO shot

2008-03-06 Thread Ken Waller
Maybe it is of interest to  someone.

Not @ 5mb - but thanks for the warning.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: Marcus A. Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:55 AM
Subject: K200D 1600 ISO shot


 Hello.

 I just got my new K200D today. Didn't have much time to play with it
 yet, but I thought I'd share a quick shot. Maybe it is of interest to
 someone. ISO 1600 at f/22 with a 40 mm DA limited (pancake).

 http://www.ntony.net/temp/IMGP0020.jpg (full resolution jpeg straight
 from the camera, 5 MB)


 Marcus


 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions. 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Ken Waller
Looks like you're about to be involved in a crash!

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message - 
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GESO - Morning Commute


 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:

 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:

 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d

 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg


 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:

 http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg

 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b


 and this:

 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx

 http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg

 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...

 cheers,
 frank







 -- 
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions. 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Margus Männik
Trying to answer some :)
  1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front 
 back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?
   
Yes... bad habits die hard. I switched to K10D fom Z-1p and do feel 
myself quite OK.

  2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
 significantly smaller in the hand.]
   
To sit comfortably in photographers (!) hands. I would like to have it 
lighter, but definitely not smaller. FDP-style grip strap would also be 
great.
  3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tractable?
   
You may ask from Adobe, why DNG format has to be uncompressed. They may 
not answer though...

  4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
 toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
 porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close up?
   
All those auto-whatever-features are extremely bad idea in complex 
lighting conditions. Try RAW and manual conversion settings.
  5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
 playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?
   
I would like to see the actual picture.
  6. Am I going to need to buy a Power Mac to process large numbers of
 photos in Lightroom without making my computer wheeze audibly?
   
No, just take a longer coffee break and make the music louder.

  7. Am I going to have to use the software that came with the camera?
   
Depends. Myself, I do like Photo Laboratory more than Adobe Camera RAW. 
Photo Browser is quite useless, but then again - Remote Assistant is SUPER.
  8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
 stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?
   
No, you need to switch SR off when camera is on tripod or other firm base.
  9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
 all the time or JPEG all the time?
   
Again - depends. Myself, I do not use it at all (I shoot only RAW), but 
I know several people who are enjoying it much.
 10. What do other people put on the User setting?
   
After switching from JPEG-shooting to RAW-shooting, I don't even remember...

 11. What's the smart way to use the Live View option?
   
No way.
 12. Why does the shutter noise have to be so loud?
   
This is a question to Sony, not to Pentax. Have you ever heard Alpha 100?

 Some of the above are actual questions.  -T
   
Some of the above are actual answers, too.

BR, Margus


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


April PUG submission form is up

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
You can submit photos for the April PUG, Portrait, at 
http://pdmlpug.org/?p=26

I've also update the Previous Galleries directory.  Follow the links 
at the bottom of the PUG or go here: 
http://pug.komkon.org/general/pastgalleries.html

Have a nice day!

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Ken Waller
The answer is 42

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: K20D questions


 1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front 
 back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?
 2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
 significantly smaller in the hand.]
 3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tractable?
 4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
 toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
 porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close up?
 5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
 playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?
 6. Am I going to need to buy a Power Mac to process large numbers of
 photos in Lightroom without making my computer wheeze audibly?
 7. Am I going to have to use the software that came with the camera?
 8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
 stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?
 9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
 all the time or JPEG all the time?
 10. What do other people put on the User setting?
 11. What's the smart way to use the Live View option?
 12. Why does the shutter noise have to be so loud?
 
 Some of the above are actual questions.  -T


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K200D 1600 ISO shot

2008-03-06 Thread Charles Robinson
On Mar 6, 2008, at 9:55, Marcus A. Hofmann wrote:

 Hello.

 I just got my new K200D today. Didn't have much time to play with it
 yet, but I thought I'd share a quick shot. Maybe it is of interest to
 someone. ISO 1600 at f/22 with a 40 mm DA limited (pancake).

 http://www.ntony.net/temp/IMGP0020.jpg (full resolution jpeg straight
 from the camera, 5 MB)


Looks pretty flippin' clean!

  -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO: See ya 'Liz

2008-03-06 Thread Cotty
On 7/3/08, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:

G'day All,

I've put together a small 4 image gallery to put last nights PESO into
a bit more context (~490kb page)

http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_016/index.htm


Cheers,

Dave

Nice gallery. The bow shot is stunning.



-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
Look at these two points together.  I'm mainly a JPG shooter, but when
the lighting gets funny I switch to RAW.  The raw processing of tricky
white balance is so good that it's worth the trouble.

I use the RAW 



  4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
 toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
 porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close
up?
   
All those auto-whatever-features are extremely bad idea in complex 
lighting conditions. Try RAW and manual conversion settings.
  5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
 playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?
   

and 

  9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
 all the time or JPEG all the time?
   
Again - depends. Myself, I do not use it at all (I shoot only RAW), but

I know several people who are enjoying it much.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Cotty
On 6/3/08, Peter Fairweather, discombobulated, unleashed:

  2. Why does it have to be so big?

I can't believe you guys!


-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
Tim Bray wrote:
  8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
 stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?

The switch is labeled incorrectly.  It should be Frank and Everybody 
else.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Need help with maritime terminology

2008-03-06 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/03/05 Wed PM 06:45:03 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: Need help with maritime terminology
 
 Dear gang,
 Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
 thingy in this image?
 
 http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg


Looks to be half cleat, half bollard.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/5-480/Ch9.htm

I've never seen a yellow one, either.  So I would call it mutant.


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Doug Brewer


Tim Bray wrote:
  1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front 
 back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?
  2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
 significantly smaller in the hand.]
  3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tractable?
  4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
 toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
 porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close up?
  5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
 playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?
  6. Am I going to need to buy a Power Mac to process large numbers of
 photos in Lightroom without making my computer wheeze audibly?
  7. Am I going to have to use the software that came with the camera?
  8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
 stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?
  9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
 all the time or JPEG all the time?
 10. What do other people put on the User setting?
 11. What's the smart way to use the Live View option?
 12. Why does the shutter noise have to be so loud?
 
 Some of the above are actual questions.  -T
 

I dunno, but Violent Purple would be a good name for a rock band.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread P. J. Alling
Seems it already is:

http://www.emp3world.com/mp3/6545/A%20Violent%20Purple/Better%20Days%20Will%20Come

http://tinyurl.com/2vqcjt

Doug Brewer wrote:
 Tim Bray wrote:
   
  1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front 
 back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?
  2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
 significantly smaller in the hand.]
  3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tractable?
  4. Why, when I tried to auto-white balance an ISO-1600 picture of a
 toddler in a bathtub using Lightroom's WB wand to click on the white
 porcelain, did the baby's flesh go all mottled when you look close up?
  5. Why, when I tried to do the same to an ISO-1600 shot of boys
 playing soccer in a yellow gym, did it snap into violent purple?
  6. Am I going to need to buy a Power Mac to process large numbers of
 photos in Lightroom without making my computer wheeze audibly?
  7. Am I going to have to use the software that came with the camera?
  8. Why is there a prominent switch for turning the image
 stabilization off, wouldn't you want it on always?
  9. Why do you want a RAW button, wouldn't most people shoot in RAW
 all the time or JPEG all the time?
 10. What do other people put on the User setting?
 11. What's the smart way to use the Live View option?
 12. Why does the shutter noise have to be so loud?

 Some of the above are actual questions.  -T

 

 I dunno, but Violent Purple would be a good name for a rock band.

   


-- 
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil...
   -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Tyro Question

2008-03-06 Thread Jack Davis
Having read several posts where back/front focus issues have been
discussed, I decided to check out a few lenses. 
I set up a yard stick and 'prox a 45 degree angle and placed the K10D
on a tripod with the camera body three feet from the chosen focus
point. (18)
At 28mm and f/2.8, it is in sharp focus between 21 and 22.
At 70mm, it appears to be in sharp focus at 18.
Two other lenses checked out as fine. (DA 16~45 @ f/4 and A 100mm f/2.8
macro @ f/2.8).
Wondering if it should make the trip to Colorado.(?)
Your thoughts would help.

Thanks,

Jack



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Doug Brewer
well, there ya go

P. J. Alling wrote:
 Seems it already is:
 
 http://www.emp3world.com/mp3/6545/A%20Violent%20Purple/Better%20Days%20Will%20Come
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2vqcjt
 
 Doug Brewer wrote:
 


I dunno, but Violent Purple would be a good name for a rock band.

  
 
 
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: April PUG submission form is up

2008-03-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
For some reason, I kept getting the fill in all required fields
message.  Every line had something in it.  What could be wrong?

 Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/6/2008 12:28 PM 
You can submit photos for the April PUG, Portrait, at 
http://pdmlpug.org/?p=26 

I've also update the Previous Galleries directory.  Follow the links

at the bottom of the PUG or go here: 
http://pug.komkon.org/general/pastgalleries.html 

Have a nice day!

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net 
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

!SIG:47d02dd0101541529716044!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Need help with maritime terminology

2008-03-06 Thread Cotty
On 6/3/08, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:

Looks to be half cleat, half bollard.

A clollard or a bleat?

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Brr. Looks freekin' cold.

I haven't had to drive in conditions like that for many years.

G

On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:26 AM, frank theriault wrote:

 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:

 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:

 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d

 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/ 
 VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg


 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:

 http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/ 
 J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg

 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b


 and this:

 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx

 http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/ 
 uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg

 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: April PUG submission form is up

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
Steve Desjardins wrote:
 For some reason, I kept getting the fill in all required fields
 message.  Every line had something in it.  What could be wrong?
 

Make sure you have selected either themed or open at the bottom.  If 
that doesn't fix it, submit directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Attach 
your photo and include any information you would have entered into the form.

Yours is the second problem I've been made aware of today.  So 
apparently my form is taking a big fat dump.  I'm looking into some 
fixes for the email line right now.

Thanks for the heads-up.  Much appreciated.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Tyro Question

2008-03-06 Thread pnstenquist
No. Because if it's adjusted to correct the focus for the one lens that misses, 
those that are right on now will be off. At least that's what I think. I 
believe the adjustment on the K10D is only an overall fix, it's not lens 
specific.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Having read several posts where back/front focus issues have been
 discussed, I decided to check out a few lenses. 
 I set up a yard stick and 'prox a 45 degree angle and placed the K10D
 on a tripod with the camera body three feet from the chosen focus
 point. (18)
 At 28mm and f/2.8, it is in sharp focus between 21 and 22.
 At 70mm, it appears to be in sharp focus at 18.
 Two other lenses checked out as fine. (DA 16~45 @ f/4 and A 100mm f/2.8
 macro @ f/2.8).
 Wondering if it should make the trip to Colorado.(?)
 Your thoughts would help.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jack
 
 
 
   
 
 
 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: April PUG submission form is up

2008-03-06 Thread Susan
I had no trouble at all submitting my april portrait :-)
Regards
Jens

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Steve Desjardins
Sendt: 6. marts 2008 20:15
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: April PUG submission form is up


For some reason, I kept getting the fill in all required fields
message.  Every line had something in it.  What could be wrong?

 Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/6/2008 12:28 PM 
You can submit photos for the April PUG, Portrait, at
http://pdmlpug.org/?p=26

I've also update the Previous Galleries directory.  Follow the links

at the bottom of the PUG or go here:
http://pug.komkon.org/general/pastgalleries.html

Have a nice day!

--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

!SIG:47d02dd0101541529716044!


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.6/1315 - Release Date: 06-03-2008
09:07



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Adam Maas
Warm (~32F) but messy. You don't get that sort of mess in real cold,
as heavy snow usually doesn't happen below -10-15C.

-Adam

On 3/6/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Brr. Looks freekin' cold.

  I haven't had to drive in conditions like that for many years.


  G


  On Mar 6, 2008, at 7:26 AM, frank theriault wrote:

   Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
   winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
   several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
   morning commute was just a bit messy:
  
   This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I took
   it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I worked
   on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:
  
   http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d
  
   http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/
   VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg
  
  
   Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:
  
   http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/
   J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg
  
   http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b
  
  
   and this:
  
   http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx
  
   http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/
   uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg
  
   Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
   (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...
  


 --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Billy Blackwelder finds an Antarctic Trout

2008-03-06 Thread Paolo Vercesi
Hi,

Funny shot Walt. It remembers me Donald Sutherland in Kelly's Heores.

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Billy was our scoundrel helo pilot :-)
  He was always pulling some wild storey out of thin air!

  Walt

  http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Antarctic-Brook.jpg



-- 
Paolo

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results

2008-03-06 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/03/05 Wed PM 11:58:22 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
 Subject: more K20D autofocus adjustment results
 
 So far I've adjusted the FA 50/1.4, the FA 35/2 and now the DA  
 16-45/4. The 50/1.4 came in at -4. I retested to make sure. Same  
 result: -4. The FA 35/2 came in at +2. Tonight I did the DA 16-45/4,  
 and as I suspected, it was closer to dead on at just +1 adjustment.

It will be interesting when someone (WW?) does this with multiple copies of the 
same lens..


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


New PDML schwag: Stickers!

2008-03-06 Thread Mark Roberts
Scott Loveless suggested this: A PDML sticker for your car (oval 
country abbreviation type sticker) and I added a You can never have 
too many lenses bumper sticker.

http://www.cafepress.com/robertstech



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: April PUG submission form is up

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
 I had no trouble at all submitting my april portrait :-)
 Regards
 Jens
 

It came through just fine.  The problem encountered was with a .name 
domain.  e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]  The form didn't like it and 
returned an invalid email address error.  After playing around with it a 
bit I determined that technically valid addresses such as 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] returned the same error.  Basically, the form 
isn't compliant with the pertinent RFCs.

The good news is that the new version plug-in works nicely.  I installed 
it at my blog and it seems to work just fine.  Sometime between closing 
the April submission form and opening the May form, I'll install the new 
version at pdmlpug.

Thanks a bunch, everyone, for keeping me up to date on these problems. 
Please don't hesitate to let me know of any difficulties you might have.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Tyro Question

2008-03-06 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Paul.
Actually I spoke to Pentax tech service (after posting the questing)
and was told, since other lens don't exhibit the malady, I need only
send the FA 28~70 f/2.8.
At the moment, I'm still considering the question.

Jack

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No. Because if it's adjusted to correct the focus for the one lens
 that misses, those that are right on now will be off. At least that's
 what I think. I believe the adjustment on the K10D is only an overall
 fix, it's not lens specific.
 Paul
  -- Original message --
 From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Having read several posts where back/front focus issues have been
  discussed, I decided to check out a few lenses. 
  I set up a yard stick and 'prox a 45 degree angle and placed the
 K10D
  on a tripod with the camera body three feet from the chosen focus
  point. (18)
  At 28mm and f/2.8, it is in sharp focus between 21 and 22.
  At 70mm, it appears to be in sharp focus at 18.
  Two other lenses checked out as fine. (DA 16~45 @ f/4 and A 100mm
 f/2.8
  macro @ f/2.8).
  Wondering if it should make the trip to Colorado.(?)
  Your thoughts would help.
  
  Thanks,
  
  Jack
  
  
  

 


  
  Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
  
  -- 
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow 
  the directions.
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
 and follow the directions.
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
LOL ... Adam, I grew up in New York and lived for a year or so in  
Vermont. I know what temps and snow conditions are like. ;-)

I've lived in California since 1979. Brrr Cold is anything under 55  
degrees F now. =8^0

Godfrey

On Mar 6, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Adam Maas wrote:

 Warm (~32F) but messy. You don't get that sort of mess in real cold,
 as heavy snow usually doesn't happen below -10-15C.

 -Adam

 On 3/6/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Brr. Looks freekin' cold.

  I haven't had to drive in conditions like that for many years.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Adam Maas
Grew up in southern BC and lived in Northern Ontario for a decade,
I've got odd definitions on what's cold ;-)

-Adam

On 3/6/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 LOL ... Adam, I grew up in New York and lived for a year or so in
  Vermont. I know what temps and snow conditions are like. ;-)

  I've lived in California since 1979. Brrr Cold is anything under 55
  degrees F now. =8^0


  Godfrey


  On Mar 6, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Adam Maas wrote:

   Warm (~32F) but messy. You don't get that sort of mess in real cold,
   as heavy snow usually doesn't happen below -10-15C.
  
   -Adam
  
   On 3/6/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Brr. Looks freekin' cold.
  
I haven't had to drive in conditions like that for many years.
  


 --

 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Tyro Question

2008-03-06 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/03/06 Thu PM 07:08:37 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: Tyro Question
 
 Having read several posts where back/front focus issues have been
 discussed, I decided to check out a few lenses. 
 I set up a yard stick and 'prox a 45 degree angle and placed the K10D
 on a tripod with the camera body three feet from the chosen focus
 point. (18)
 At 28mm and f/2.8, it is in sharp focus between 21 and 22.
 At 70mm, it appears to be in sharp focus at 18.
 Two other lenses checked out as fine. (DA 16~45 @ f/4 and A 100mm f/2.8
 macro @ f/2.8).
 Wondering if it should make the trip to Colorado.(?)
 Your thoughts would help.

If you mean the incorrect lens, then yes.


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Need help with maritime terminology

2008-03-06 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/03/06 Thu PM 07:20:01 GMT
 To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: Need help with maritime terminology
 
 On 6/3/08, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
 Looks to be half cleat, half bollard.
 
 A clollard or a bleat?

Don't be a capstard.


-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: April PUG submission form is up

2008-03-06 Thread Steve Desjardins
It went this time.  Maybe when I hit themed or open the first time I
put the cursor in the wrong place and didn't trigger anything.  Anyway,
thanks.

 Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/6/2008 2:21 PM 
Steve Desjardins wrote:
 For some reason, I kept getting the fill in all required fields
 message.  Every line had something in it.  What could be wrong?
 

Make sure you have selected either themed or open at the bottom. 
If 
that doesn't fix it, submit directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Attach

your photo and include any information you would have entered into the
form.

Yours is the second problem I've been made aware of today.  So 
apparently my form is taking a big fat dump.  I'm looking into some 
fixes for the email line right now.

Thanks for the heads-up.  Much appreciated.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net 
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net 
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.

!SIG:47d04478241448412425888!


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Bob W
Can't wait for the Gulf Stream to stop. Then we'll have a climate like
that.

Bob 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of frank theriault
 Sent: 06 March 2008 15:26
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: GESO - Morning Commute
 
 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:
 
 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I
took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I
worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d
 
 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/Vm
 emUGFd068/s1600-h/mar_06_08+002.jpg
 
 
 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:
 
 http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4
 GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/mar_06_08+003.jpg
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b
 
 
 and this:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx
 
 http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD
 _OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/mar_06_08+001.jpg
 
 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...
 
 cheers,
 frank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
 above and follow the directions.
 
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Need help with maritime terminology

2008-03-06 Thread Ken Waller
 I've never seen a yellow one, either.  So I would call it mutant.

It could be ailing.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need help with maritime terminology




 From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2008/03/05 Wed PM 06:45:03 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: Need help with maritime terminology

 Dear gang,
 Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
 thingy in this image?

 http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg


 Looks to be half cleat, half bollard.
 http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/5-480/Ch9.htm

 I've never seen a yellow one, either.  So I would call it mutant.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread pnstenquist
I really like the shot through the bus window. Unique, interesting and well 
rendered. The traffic pics are good as well. We had that storm yesterday. I 
know we're over our average winter snowfall mount. No record yet, but we must 
be getting close. Very cold as well. Not much fun.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Yesterday we had yet another snowfall.  Not a huge one, but this
 winter has set a record for the most snow here in Toronto.  Only
 several mid-winter thaws have prevented huge accumulations.  The
 morning commute was just a bit messy:
 
 This one's a bit muddy (OTOH, it was still pretty dark out when I took
 it) and otherwise has technical deficiencies (it was 5am when I worked
 on it), but you can see what the poor bus driver had to deal with:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2rjh9d
 
 http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADN3a2bVI/Bqg/VmemUGFd068/s1600-h/
 mar_06_08+002.jpg
 
 
 Here's what snow does to traffic in Toronto:
 
 http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADOHa2bWI/Bqo/J4GMEqxp1JU/s1600-h/
 mar_06_08+003.jpg
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2bf88b
 
 
 and this:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/2ad4qx
 
 http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9ADlna2bXI/Bqw/uD_OXC4yfkg/s1600-h/
 mar_06_08+001.jpg
 
 Not great photos, but rather a record of what's become almost daily
 (or at least weekly) life here in Toronto lately...
 
 cheers,
 frank
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread Christian

  2. Why does it have to be so big?

that's what she said...




-- 

Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: March PUG is up

2008-03-06 Thread Ken Waller
Thanks for your efforts Scott

My favs
+Snow Crystal
+Fractal Sandfish
+Leaf Skeleton
+Flute
+Daddy's Girl

A very nice effort on all the images...

Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f

- Original Message - 
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: March PUG is up


 http://pug.komkon.org/

 33 very nice photographs.  Only one shot on film, which is the lowest
 film to digital ratio I recall seeing.  There are also a LOT of 3rd
 party lenses involved.  So, a few firsts, I guess.

 I'll have next month's submission form (Portraits!) up later tonight.

 Enjoy.

 -- 
 Scott Loveless
 http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions. 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Farewell your Majesty

2008-03-06 Thread Brian Walters
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Oh gawd...here we go.
 
 It must be the engineer in you, 


It's a curse...



 As for the clutter, it would be a more powerful image without it,
 but
 as a record of the event it's necessary IMO. 


Agreed.

 
 It was quite a festive atmosphere. The local Port authority was
 handing out Aussie flags to all comers  as she was sailing past
 someone on board started up the Aussie, Aussie, Aussie... chant
 :-)



There's one in every crowd

I would have liked to have got into Sydney to take some shots of the two ships 
(QE2 and Queen Victoria) when they passed each other.  Seems like the rest of 
Sydney did :-)   In the end, it was just a bit too much hassle.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/

--
Find out how you can get spam free email.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


OT: Online Image Application

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
I thought some of you might find this interesting:

http://a.viary.com/blog

Cheers,

Dave

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: GESO - Morning Commute

2008-03-06 Thread Rick Womer
...and that usually happens in July!

The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San
Francisco--anon., -not- Mark Twain or WC Fields.

--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I've lived in California since 1979. Brrr Cold is
 anything under 55  
 degrees F now. =8^0
 
 Godfrey
 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Online Image Application

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
...oh yeah. I have 5 invitations for anyone who might be interested to
try it out.

Cheers,

Dave.

On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:01 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I thought some of you might find this interesting:

  http://a.viary.com/blog

  Cheers,

  Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Online Image Application

2008-03-06 Thread Bob W
 
 I thought some of you might find this interesting:
 
 http://a.viary.com/blog
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dave

Who needs software in a world where there are knives?

http://website.lineone.net/~a1/jocelyne/


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Online Image Application

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
Bob W wrote:
 I thought some of you might find this interesting:

 http://a.viary.com/blog

 Cheers,

 Dave
 
 Who needs software in a world where there are knives?
 
 http://website.lineone.net/~a1/jocelyne/
 
 
Argh!  My eyes!  Make it stop burning!

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Antarctica Slide Scan

2008-03-06 Thread Walter Hamler
Amita, I just saw your response so I am late answering.

I was assigned to the navy squadron that provided logistic support to
the National Science Foundation efforts in Antarctica. We
prepositioned from Pt. Mugu, CA to Christchurch, NZ each year in late
August/early Sept. First flights to McMurdo, Antarctica were usually
in early Sept with continuous flights almost daily to ferry equipment,
supplies and people into McMurdo.

The two years I was attached to the squadron were probably the most
frustrating ever for the squadron and the NSF. Both years saw several
planes involved in serious crashes and subsequent retrevial
activities. One area, called Dome Charley, the third highest plateay
dome on the continent, saw two planes crash in one day. A third plane
had to rescue the crews of the other two. To say the least, we were
very concerned for several days!

Eventually, the following year, both planes were repaired and
recovered. I still remember the day that two severly crippled, but
flying, C-130's flew back to McMurdo. I left the squadron later that
year and the following years saw two more planes recovered from other
crash sites.

BTW, I was the Photographic Officer in the squadron, supposedly in
charge of the aerial mapping photography taskings we had.
Unfortunately, the first plane to crash the first year was our one and
only camera equipped aircraft. Such luck!!!

Walt

On 3/4/08, Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gorgeous! Why were you in Antartica, Walt? It is one of the places I'd
 like to visit someday.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


I'm embarrassed to be a product of the 70s

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb
http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html

This is too funny for words.

William Robb

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


K20D and Lightroom don't play nice

2008-03-06 Thread Tim Bray
I have now established, by direct experience experience and net
searches, that Lightroom has problems with K20D DNG's.  Basically,
white balance correction seems to work but in fact severely damages
the images.  I believe this is the same code as occurs in ACR, so I'd
bet that wouldn't work either.   The Pentax Photo Lab software can in
fact correct White Balance.   I will investigate further and report
back on:

- Do PEFs work better? (I'd assume not)
- Can I just do the WB in the klunky Pentax software then switch back
to LR for the rest of the workflow?

One assumes that Pentax knows about this?  -Tim

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Need help with maritime terminology

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: AlunFoto 
Subject: Need help with maritime terminology


 Dear gang,
 Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
 thingy in this image?
 
 http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg

Cleat.
It's used for tying the boat to the harbour so it doesn't escape.


William Robb (who is much farther from the ocean than you are)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D questions

2008-03-06 Thread David Savage
At 06:57 AM 7/03/2008, Christian wrote:

   2. Why does it have to be so big?

that's what she said...


Really?

Isn't pointing and laughing normal?

Cheers,


Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D and Lightroom don't play nice

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: Tim Bray
Subject: K20D and Lightroom don't play nice


I have now established, by direct experience experience and net
 searches, that Lightroom has problems with K20D DNG's.  Basically,
 white balance correction seems to work but in fact severely damages
 the images.  I believe this is the same code as occurs in ACR, so I'd
 bet that wouldn't work either.   The Pentax Photo Lab software can in
 fact correct White Balance.   I will investigate further and report
 back on:

 - Do PEFs work better? (I'd assume not)
 - Can I just do the WB in the klunky Pentax software then switch back
 to LR for the rest of the workflow?

 One assumes that Pentax knows about this?  -Tim

One hopes that Adobe knows about it, since it is their software that is broken. 
I'd expect that
there will be an ACR update fairly soon to fix the issue.

William Robb


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I'm embarrassed to be a product of the 70s

2008-03-06 Thread Scott Loveless
William Robb wrote:
 http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html
 
 This is too funny for words.
 
 William Robb
 
This is a picture of Doug, right? 
http://bp3.blogger.com/_bkFIPLIOGL8/Rua47R0G3YI/DDo/325jLPJiFw4/s1600-h/doobiebro.jpg


-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I'm embarrassed to be a product of the 70s

2008-03-06 Thread Cotty
On 6/3/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:

http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html

This is too funny for words.

Oh boy, tears and breathlessness - thanks.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D and Lightroom don't play nice

2008-03-06 Thread pnstenquist
ACR works fine. At least that's true for the version that comes with PSCS 1. 
However, the eyedropper doesn't work. But I rarely use that. I set color 
temperature to my liking. All the pics I've posted were RAW DNG files 
processsed with ACR.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I have now established, by direct experience experience and net
 searches, that Lightroom has problems with K20D DNG's.  Basically,
 white balance correction seems to work but in fact severely damages
 the images.  I believe this is the same code as occurs in ACR, so I'd
 bet that wouldn't work either.   The Pentax Photo Lab software can in
 fact correct White Balance.   I will investigate further and report
 back on:
 
 - Do PEFs work better? (I'd assume not)
 - Can I just do the WB in the klunky Pentax software then switch back
 to LR for the rest of the workflow?
 
 One assumes that Pentax knows about this?  -Tim
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


So much Enablement, so Little Time

2008-03-06 Thread William Robb
Yesterday, I get my K20, today my 58/1.4 Nokton arrived.
What a gorgeous lens it is.
I start a new renovation in a month, so I'll even be able to pay for all this 
stuff.
Life is, at the moment, a bowl of cherries.

William Robb

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D and Lightroom don't play nice

2008-03-06 Thread Mark Roberts
Tim Bray wrote:
 I have now established, by direct experience experience and net
 searches, that Lightroom has problems with K20D DNG's.  Basically,
 white balance correction seems to work but in fact severely damages
 the images.  I believe this is the same code as occurs in ACR, so I'd
 bet that wouldn't work either.   The Pentax Photo Lab software can in
 fact correct White Balance.   I will investigate further and report
 back on:
 
 - Do PEFs work better? (I'd assume not)
 - Can I just do the WB in the klunky Pentax software then switch back
 to LR for the rest of the workflow?
 
 One assumes that Pentax knows about this?  -Tim

Yes. Thomas Knoll of Adobe pointed it out in his blog a few days ago. 
It's an issue with how the K20D calculates the color temperature and 
tint numbers for DNG (doesn't affect PEF files). The images look fine, 
as Paul and others have found, but the numbers are wrong. And if you try 
to change balance with an application that uses the correct numbers you 
get wonky color.

According to one poster on the DP Review Pentax forum (where there was 
much hand-wringing and rending of garments for a few days), Ned Bunnell 
has been notified and has notified the engineers in Japan. I'd expect a 
pretty quick firmware update for this.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K20D and Lightroom don't play nice

2008-03-06 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
- Until Lightroom and Camera Raw are updated for the K20D  
specifically, they cannot directly operate on K20D PEF files.

- The only way to transfer Pentax Photo Lab adjustment to Lightroom  
is to render the RAW file as a TIFF or JPEG.

- Again, until LR and CR are updated, they have no calibration tables  
for the K20D. I read on one of the Lightroom forums that the K20D  
produces DNG files with calibration metrics that are way out of wack  
from the normal range.

If you want to email to my Yahoo account a representative DNG or two  
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), I would like to fool with the K20D calibrations  
in Lightroom. Or put a couple on a web server somewhere and let me  
know the URL.

Godfrey

On Mar 6, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Tim Bray wrote:

 I have now established, by direct experience experience and net
 searches, that Lightroom has problems with K20D DNG's.  Basically,
 white balance correction seems to work but in fact severely damages
 the images.  I believe this is the same code as occurs in ACR, so I'd
 bet that wouldn't work either.   The Pentax Photo Lab software can in
 fact correct White Balance.   I will investigate further and report
 back on:

 - Do PEFs work better? (I'd assume not)
 - Can I just do the WB in the klunky Pentax software then switch back
 to LR for the rest of the workflow?

 One assumes that Pentax knows about this?  -Tim

 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


OT: Any US list members with knowledge abou the used (motor) yacht market?

2008-03-06 Thread Pål Jensen
Sorry about the OT message but I'm considering buying a 42ft Grand Banks 
motor yacht from Florida. Anyoneone who knows the general state of the 
market and whether asking prices are (very) inflated? 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


  1   2   >