PESO -- Spring Idle

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
I shot this damn, now that I look at it, about 5 years ago give or take 
a season, and experimented with a bunch of different crops.  Never got 
around to posting it.  It really needs to be framed tighter for the 
internet or printed bigger, also I managed to have a tree growing out of 
the young woman's head...


The reason I finally posted it was the cropping discussion earlier.

https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20springidle.html

Equipment: Pentax K20D w/vmc Vivitar 70-210mm f2.8~4.0 (Komine)

As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso : The Evil Sky

2017-01-25 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Dramatic shapes and colors!


Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:31 PM, ann sanfedele  wrote:

> taken the same evening as the Gaudy Sky that I showed you lot a couple of
> weeks ago
>
> https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2016-and-a
> ll-that/i-PV5tG7C/XL
>
> Hand-held  , not cropped ..
> K-5, DA18-55 ISO 800
>
> ann
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso : The Evil Sky

2017-01-25 Thread Marco Alpert
How apropos.

m

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 8:31 PM, ann sanfedele  wrote:
> 
> taken the same evening as the Gaudy Sky that I showed you lot a couple of 
> weeks ago
> 
> https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2016-and-all-that/i-PV5tG7C/XL
> 
> Hand-held  , not cropped ..
> K-5, DA18-55 ISO 800
> 
> ann
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso : The Evil Sky

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
A dark mood to be sure. Well done.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 11:31 PM, ann sanfedele  wrote:
> 
> taken the same evening as the Gaudy Sky that I showed you lot a couple of 
> weeks ago
> 
> https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2016-and-all-that/i-PV5tG7C/XL
> 
> Hand-held  , not cropped ..
> K-5, DA18-55 ISO 800
> 
> ann
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso : The Evil Sky

2017-01-25 Thread ann sanfedele

Thanks, Philip..

ann


On 1/25/2017 11:43 PM, Philip Northeast wrote:

Nice silhouette, definitely looks evil

Philip Northeast

www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au

On 26/1/17 3:31 pm, ann sanfedele wrote:

taken the same evening as the Gaudy Sky that I showed you lot a couple
of weeks ago

https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2016-and-all-that/i-PV5tG7C/XL 




Hand-held  , not cropped ..
K-5, DA18-55 ISO 800

ann







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Peso : The Evil Sky

2017-01-25 Thread Philip Northeast

Nice silhouette, definitely looks evil

Philip Northeast

www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au

On 26/1/17 3:31 pm, ann sanfedele wrote:

taken the same evening as the Gaudy Sky that I showed you lot a couple
of weeks ago

https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2016-and-all-that/i-PV5tG7C/XL


Hand-held  , not cropped ..
K-5, DA18-55 ISO 800

ann




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: DP review learned it's lesson on the K-3, the KP first look is already up.

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
Thanks for the offer but I cannot afford either at the moment. I'm just 
happy I have the one I've got.



On 1/25/2017 9:35 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

I have a nice K5 with battery grip to sell. And it's possible I could be 
persuaded to part with my K3. I have the grip for that camera as well.

Paul via phone


On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:14 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:

https://www.dpreview.com/products/pentax/slrs/pentax_kp

They say it's the successor to the K-3 line.  The user interface that began 
with the K-7 is now completely replaced.  Long live the new user interface*...

Looks like I'll have to be satisfied with used K-5/K-3 cameras for a long time.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Peso : The Evil Sky

2017-01-25 Thread ann sanfedele
taken the same evening as the Gaudy Sky that I showed you lot a couple 
of weeks ago


https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2016-and-all-that/i-PV5tG7C/XL

Hand-held  , not cropped ..
K-5, DA18-55 ISO 800

ann


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
So it's not a screen on the back of the camera? Then I'm okay with it. You have 
my permission to proceed. :-). I'm clueless when it comes to mirrorless.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
> 
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> 
>> I won't like mirrorless until they invent a way to isolate the LED screen 
>> from ambient light. Of course then the size advantage is gone.
> 
> It's called "EVF" or electronic viewfinder. Smaller than a pentaprism.
> 
> 
>> Paul via phone
>> 
>>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Brian Walters wrote:
>>> 
 Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
 and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
 a thought...
>>> 
>>> APS-C becoming strictly mirrorless is how I see the future. At least
>>> the near future. Full-frame will become mainly or all mirrorless
>>> eventually but it will take longer.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:

>I won't like mirrorless until they invent a way to isolate the LED screen from 
>ambient light. Of course then the size advantage is gone.

It's called "EVF" or electronic viewfinder. Smaller than a pentaprism.


>Paul via phone
>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
>> 
>> Brian Walters wrote:
>> 
>>> Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
>>> and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
>>> a thought...
>> 
>> APS-C becoming strictly mirrorless is how I see the future. At least
>> the near future. Full-frame will become mainly or all mirrorless
>> eventually but it will take longer.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
To that add the problem of no diopter correction. Right? I've never used 
mirrorless, but I assume it's approximately the same as live view??

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
> 
> I won't like mirrorless until they invent a way to isolate the LED screen 
> from ambient light. Of course then the size advantage is gone.
> 
> Paul via phone
> 
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
>> 
>> Brian Walters wrote:
>> 
>>> Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
>>> and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
>>> a thought...
>> 
>> APS-C becoming strictly mirrorless is how I see the future. At least
>> the near future. Full-frame will become mainly or all mirrorless
>> eventually but it will take longer.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
>> www.robertstech.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
I won't like mirrorless until they invent a way to isolate the LED screen from 
ambient light. Of course then the size advantage is gone.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
> 
> Brian Walters wrote:
> 
>> Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
>> and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
>> a thought...
> 
> APS-C becoming strictly mirrorless is how I see the future. At least
> the near future. Full-frame will become mainly or all mirrorless
> eventually but it will take longer.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Mark Roberts
Brian Walters wrote:

>Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
>and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
>a thought...

APS-C becoming strictly mirrorless is how I see the future. At least
the near future. Full-frame will become mainly or all mirrorless
eventually but it will take longer.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Carlton Beach

2017-01-25 Thread Philip Northeast

Brian

There is a sand dune to the right cutting off the full view of the 
beach, so I was mainly trying to minimise that obstruction. But next 
time I go there I will try climbing to the top of the dune for a 
different angle.



Carlton Beach is on the Eastern side of the moth of the Derwent River 
estuary. The mountain in the background is Mt Wellington.


I did have the GPS on t K1 turned on so on the photo's flkr page there 
is a good map of the location and where the picture was taken. I do like 
the GPS function.



Philip Northeast

www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au

On 26/1/17 11:04 am, Brian Walters wrote:

Peaceful looking spot.

I would have liked to have seen the full sweep of the beach rather than
being cut off on the right.  Other than that - very nice, especially
with the dog walkers to give scale.

Where is Carlton Beach?


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017, at 02:31 PM, Philip Northeast wrote:

Summer's day at Carlton Beach

https://flic.kr/p/RwW8Ca

Pentax K1  & Sigma 35mm f1.4mm art lens

--
Philip Northeast

www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au

--




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
Sounds like APS-C is going to be strictly an enthusiast line for Pentax. That 
would make sense. Or perhaps there's more to come.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 8:48 PM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
> 
> From my experience, the K-3 is an excellent studio camera. The KP
> doesn't even have X mode on the dial, and they left off the X-sync
> socket.
> 
> It only accepts a single HDXC card.
> 
> Missing lots of handy controls off the back. No top info LCD. But it
> has a dial position for HDR. Retch. Why not one for selective colour
> too?
> 
> Plenty to not like here. I'd take a K-3ii over this.
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
>> I'm sure the photo came from Pentax marketing. Adorama didn't choose the 
>> lens. Why is it a disappointing replacement for the K3? It seems to be a 
>> step up in  high ISO capability, and I won't be surprised if the autofocus 
>> is excellent.
>> 
>> Paul via phone
>> 
>>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:00 PM, P. J. Alling  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather 
>>> sealed lens...
>>> 
>>> The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit 
>>> disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it 
>>> probably was...
>>> 
>>> 
 On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
 https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA
 
 Paul via phone
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -bmw
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: DP review learned it's lesson on the K-3, the KP first look is already up.

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
I have a nice K5 with battery grip to sell. And it's possible I could be 
persuaded to part with my K3. I have the grip for that camera as well.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 9:14 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:
> 
> https://www.dpreview.com/products/pentax/slrs/pentax_kp
> 
> They say it's the successor to the K-3 line.  The user interface that began 
> with the K-7 is now completely replaced.  Long live the new user interface*...
> 
> Looks like I'll have to be satisfied with used K-5/K-3 cameras for a long 
> time.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


DP review learned it's lesson on the K-3, the KP first look is already up.

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling

https://www.dpreview.com/products/pentax/slrs/pentax_kp

They say it's the successor to the K-3 line.  The user interface that 
began with the K-7 is now completely replaced.  Long live the new user 
interface*...


Looks like I'll have to be satisfied with used K-5/K-3 cameras for a 
long time.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Bruce Walker
>From my experience, the K-3 is an excellent studio camera. The KP
doesn't even have X mode on the dial, and they left off the X-sync
socket.

It only accepts a single HDXC card.

Missing lots of handy controls off the back. No top info LCD. But it
has a dial position for HDR. Retch. Why not one for selective colour
too?

Plenty to not like here. I'd take a K-3ii over this.


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
> I'm sure the photo came from Pentax marketing. Adorama didn't choose the 
> lens. Why is it a disappointing replacement for the K3? It seems to be a step 
> up in  high ISO capability, and I won't be surprised if the autofocus is 
> excellent.
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:00 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:
>>
>> I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather sealed 
>> lens...
>>
>> The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit 
>> disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it probably 
>> was...
>>
>>
>>> On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>> Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
>>> https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA
>>>
>>> Paul via phone
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Pentax KP camera size compared to K-5 and K-3

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling

There is no meaningful size difference between a KP and K-5.

http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,187

Ditto the KP and K-3 just in case anyone cared...

http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,485


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO - Alfama Garden

2017-01-25 Thread Rick Womer
There's no flat ground, and very little space, so...

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18336402

(K-5, DA 16-45)

Comments appreciated.

Rick





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Bottom line thought about the new KP

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
Everything is a trade off in photography.   I can see some of the 
reasons for the things that were traded off, but I think the they're 
headed in the wrong direction for a DSLR.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Ken Waller
>...work with just one lens, to make it easier to concentrate on framing 
and composition.


Don't see how that would work in outdoor/nature photography.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "Eric Weir" 

Subject: Re: Cropping





On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Eric Weir  wrote:

I crop often. Sometimes radically. To focus more clearly on what 
interests me in the image. Am I a terrible photographer?


Don’t know where to start in responding to the responses. So many. So 
interesing. So helpful. Special thanks to Cotty, Bob, Larry, and Stan. 
Also Paul, John C, Ann, Igor, and Boris. I think I’ll try to summarize and 
maybe later respond to individual responses. I hope y’all will be able to 
find yourselves in the summary.


So what I heard was: Try frame to get what you want in the first place. 
Reduce the variables, e.g., work with just one lens, to make it easier to 
concentrate on framing and composition. Study composition, and work to get 
better at it. On the other hand, cropping is involved from beginning to 
end, from composing the shot before it’s taken to final editing for 
presentation. And it is the image presented that is important. Often 
circumstances, e.g., dynamic moving or changing subjects or settings, make 
it difficult to frame for the image you want. You can frame too tight, 
missing the image you wanted. Occasionally there’s a secondary image in 
the original image that can be brought out by cropping. Reframing in post 
is/may be an aesthetic necessity. Finally, aiming to frame right in the 
first placing and cropping in post both can help you see more creatively.


Again, thanks too all. I don’t know much, but a hell of a lot of what I 
know I learned from y’all.


--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

“Man has been a murderer forever.”

- Peter Matthiessen.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO -- Salt marsh with open water. Now in formerly Living Color.

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
Well true but I bet I could take the tiff file from the second version 
and create an improved B as well.



On 1/25/2017 7:11 PM, Rick Womer wrote:

I like that =a lot= more.  The winter-ness of it is much enhanced, and
the variation in color in the grasses is much greater than the
variation in greys was.

Cheers,

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:21 PM, P. J. Alling
 wrote:

It was a fairly grey day, and the image was two toned really, but here it
is.

https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20marshstream-c.html

On 1/24/2017 8:55 PM, Rick Womer wrote:

I join the appreciative chorus. I'm curious about a color rendering,
though.

Rick


On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 23:33 Alan C  wrote:


Nice composition PJ. It can't be too salty with that amount of grass. I
have

that lens - perhaps it needs an outing? I tend to use the HD 55-300 90%
of

the time.



Alan C



-Original Message-

From: P. J. Alling

Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:31 PM

To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Subject: PESO -- Salt marsh with open water.



Winter scene, brown grass, rocks, sand, a little snow, and very cold
water.



https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20marshstream.html



Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6



As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.





--

PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

PDML@pdml.net

http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and

follow the directions.





---

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

https://www.avast.com/antivirus





--

PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

PDML@pdml.net

http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
Well they've "upgraded" the hardware of the user interface but 
downgraded a lot of the actual mechanical specifications of the camera 
itself.   Except for the high ISO limit everything else seems to be 
equal or less than the K-3.



On 1/25/2017 7:30 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

I'm sure the photo came from Pentax marketing. Adorama didn't choose the lens. 
Why is it a disappointing replacement for the K3? It seems to be a step up in  
high ISO capability, and I won't be surprised if the autofocus is excellent.

Paul via phone


On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:00 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:

I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather sealed 
lens...

The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit 
disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it probably 
was...



On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA

Paul via phone


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
That might make sense if there was any evidence at all that Ricoh has 
any interest at all in building an advanced mirrorless camera line.  
They had the basis for one and decided do quietly drop it, (and I don't 
mean either Pentax product).  What this reminds me of more than anything 
is the Canon EOS SL but at a higher level.


Pentax was actually gaining traction in the DSLR mindspace with the 
K-5/K-3 cameras.  In fact a lot of Nikon D300 users actually were 
posting a few years ago that those cameras were the true successors to 
the D300 that Nikon couldn't be bothered to build.


I wasn't going to voice this but, what it looks to me more than 
anything, is that the Nikon D500 frightened Ricoh into ceding the field 
of advanced to semi pro APS-C DSLRs to Nikon.  Ricoh decided that they 
couldn't really compete with Nikon if they decided to build a real 
flagship APS-C DSLR, so they're sticking to the advanced amateur level 
with features that no one else is bothering with.


I mean just look at the specifications, USB 2.0, the lower specification 
SD card/bus speed than any other advanced camera using SD cards.  Single 
SD card slot, well I assume that because if it were dual slots they'd 
surely mention that in the specifications.  Slower maximum mechanical 
shutter speed,  with no mention of a cyclic life longer than 100,000.


Really this is pretty much the mechanics of a K-70 with mostly software 
tricks to make it seem like an advanced camera.  Sure there are lots of 
dials and I kind of like that but the guts of the camera seem to be not 
much more than a K-70 with a bigger buffer.


About the only specification that seems to be advanced is the new High 
ISO limit.


On 1/25/2017 7:07 PM, Brian Walters wrote:

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017, at 11:00 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather
sealed lens...

The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit
disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it
probably was...



Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
a thought...


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA

Paul via phone


--






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> I crop often. Sometimes radically. To focus more clearly on what interests me 
> in the image. Am I a terrible photographer?

Don’t know where to start in responding to the responses. So many. So 
interesing. So helpful. Special thanks to Cotty, Bob, Larry, and Stan. Also 
Paul, John C, Ann, Igor, and Boris. I think I’ll try to summarize and maybe 
later respond to individual responses. I hope y’all will be able to find 
yourselves in the summary.

So what I heard was: Try frame to get what you want in the first place. Reduce 
the variables, e.g., work with just one lens, to make it easier to concentrate 
on framing and composition. Study composition, and work to get better at it. On 
the other hand, cropping is involved from beginning to end, from composing the 
shot before it’s taken to final editing for presentation. And it is the image 
presented that is important. Often circumstances, e.g., dynamic moving or 
changing subjects or settings, make it difficult to frame for the image you 
want. You can frame too tight, missing the image you wanted. Occasionally 
there’s a secondary image in the original image that can be brought out by 
cropping. Reframing in post is/may be an aesthetic necessity. Finally, aiming 
to frame right in the first placing and cropping in post both can help you see 
more creatively. 

Again, thanks too all. I don’t know much, but a hell of a lot of what I know I 
learned from y’all.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

“Man has been a murderer forever.”

- Peter Matthiessen.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
I'm sure the photo came from Pentax marketing. Adorama didn't choose the lens. 
Why is it a disappointing replacement for the K3? It seems to be a step up in  
high ISO capability, and I won't be surprised if the autofocus is excellent.

Paul via phone

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 7:00 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:
> 
> I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather sealed 
> lens...
> 
> The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit 
> disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it probably 
> was...
> 
> 
>> On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
>> https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA
>> 
>> Paul via phone
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Bruce Walker  wrote:
> 
> Two things I can think of. Either that camera is using a new cotton
> sensor, or you are guilty of pushing fake news on us. You were never
> there at all, but instead posed some of your friends holding signs in
> front of a painted fabric backdrop.

I’m following a guy on Instagram—Daniel Kukla--who did a project in the Arctic 
during which he was at times unable to use his camera(s) due to the cold 
temperatures. To get images he exposed sheets of some kind of light-sensitive 
fabric or film. I’ve searched for information on his website and further on the 
web but haven’t found anything. I’ve written to him. I may be misremembering.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, 
men would die from a great loneliness of spirit." 

- Chief Seattle






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO -- Salt marsh with open water. Now in formerly Living Color.

2017-01-25 Thread Rick Womer
I like that =a lot= more.  The winter-ness of it is much enhanced, and
the variation in color in the grasses is much greater than the
variation in greys was.

Cheers,

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:21 PM, P. J. Alling
 wrote:
> It was a fairly grey day, and the image was two toned really, but here it
> is.
>
> https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20marshstream-c.html
>
> On 1/24/2017 8:55 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>>
>> I join the appreciative chorus. I'm curious about a color rendering,
>> though.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 23:33 Alan C  wrote:
>>
>>> Nice composition PJ. It can't be too salty with that amount of grass. I
>>> have
>>>
>>> that lens - perhaps it needs an outing? I tend to use the HD 55-300 90%
>>> of
>>>
>>> the time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alan C
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>>
>>> From: P. J. Alling
>>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:31 PM
>>>
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>
>>> Subject: PESO -- Salt marsh with open water.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Winter scene, brown grass, rocks, sand, a little snow, and very cold
>>> water.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20marshstream.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Exposure compensation

2017-01-25 Thread Rick Womer
Eric, here's a concrete answer from my concrete little brain:

If you're in Program mode, the exposure compensation adjustment (the
+/- button + the rear dial on the K-5) moves the exposure the desired
number of stops up or down the program line; i.e. generally adjusts
both shutter and aperture and leaves ISO alone.

If you're in aperture priority mode, it adjusts shutter speed, and
vice versa. If you're in TAV mode, it adjusts the ISO.

Hope that helps.

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Eric Weir  wrote:
>
> I’ve been puzzled by this. How does it work? There are only three 
> variables—sensitivity, aperture, shutter speed. Doesn’t it have to adjust one 
> of those? Then what’s with a separate function?
>
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
>
> 'The universe is shot through in all parts by a single sort of love"
>
> - Kabir
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Brian Walters
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017, at 11:00 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather 
> sealed lens...
> 
> The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit 
> disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it 
> probably was...



Perhaps Ricoh is looking to condense its APS-C DSLRs to one capable body
and concentrate seriously on FF for DSLR and mirrorless for APS-C.  Just
a thought...


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/

> 
> 
> On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
> > https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA
> >
> > Paul via phone
> 
> 
> -- 



-- 
--

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
  love email again


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Carlton Beach

2017-01-25 Thread Brian Walters
Peaceful looking spot.

I would have liked to have seen the full sweep of the beach rather than
being cut off on the right.  Other than that - very nice, especially
with the dog walkers to give scale.

Where is Carlton Beach?


Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017, at 02:31 PM, Philip Northeast wrote:
> Summer's day at Carlton Beach
> 
> https://flic.kr/p/RwW8Ca
> 
> Pentax K1  & Sigma 35mm f1.4mm art lens
> 
> -- 
> Philip Northeast
> 
> www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
> 
> -- 

-- 
--

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders
  wherever you are


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Carlton Beach

2017-01-25 Thread Rick Womer
I really like the colors and the sweeping lines of the composition.

The people are =really= tiny, though. They'd add a lot to the photo
with some cropping from the top and left.

Cheers,

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Charles Robinson
 wrote:
> Looks very pleasant.  Tons nicer than here in the US Midwest right now!
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Philip Northeast 
> wrote:
>
>> Summer's day at Carlton Beach
>>
>> https://flic.kr/p/RwW8Ca
>>
>> Pentax K1  & Sigma 35mm f1.4mm art lens
>>
>> --
>> Philip Northeast
>>
>> www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  -Charles
>
> --
> ** Please note my email address has changed **
> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
I guess Adorama doesn't realize that the DA 40mm f2.8 isn't a weather 
sealed lens...


The fact that it's the replacement for the K-3 series is just a bit 
disappointing, actually that's an understatement, but I expected it 
probably was...



On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA

Paul via phone



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread ann sanfedele

I see the bands you speak of, Charles...

I'm sticking with my original pick as the one I might chose for an 
article because it shows the numbers of people and doesn't have too much 
sky in it.. I think it is well balanced photographically, shows the 
peacefulness of the march and none of the signs are gross.  But that's 
just me..


ann



On 1/25/2017 1:53 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:

I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
banding/lines through the sky on this image?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731

Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:


On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:


OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
much, much smaller.




Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one

.


Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole

story.

Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:



I think this one is actually quite good:



and this one indicates some grievances:



Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
group.

So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
present those 3 or 4 ;-)

This is fun

(incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
those above but am working on a fix)





--


Cheers,
   Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Bruce Walker
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:
>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
>>
>> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
>> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg
>
> Thanks. Weird. Looks like fabric. I’ll be interested in explanatory 
> speculations.

Two things I can think of. Either that camera is using a new cotton
sensor, or you are guilty of pushing fake news on us. You were never
there at all, but instead posed some of your friends holding signs in
front of a painted fabric backdrop.

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA

Paul via phone



Followed just minutes later by B

http://link.bandh.com/YesConnect/HtmlMessagePreview?LHEjeD0co9-uybfhSQaCvfx-2K3tSjDpry5vFL_H-CA=.enc

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread ann sanfedele

oy Cotty, I love you
ann

On 1/25/2017 11:33 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:

On 25/1/17, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:


I read Stan's comment as a bit of a toungue in cheek

Surely shome mishtake ;-)




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/25/2017 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA

Paul via phone



I watched the intro video & have a question about the electronic shutter.

Can it be used with flash at shutter speeds greater than 1/180 sec?

That is, turn off the mechanical shutter & use flash at 1/500 sec (for
example) without having to use a High Speed Sync mode & losing flash power?


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Larry Colen



Paul Stenquist wrote:

Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA



PF on KP
https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pentax-news/pentax-kp-officially-announced.html



Paul via phone


--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:17 PM, John  wrote:
> 
> I went through all the other images trying to recreate the conditions
> under which I could see it, and if it *is* in any of the others, I
> couldn't make it visible on my monitor.

I just went through and compared what I could see with my editing in LR. I was 
going to say it’s more evident in images that were radically cropped. But—if I 
hold my head at just the right angle--I think I see it in the last image and 
it’s not cropped at all. 

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net 

'The universe is shot through in all parts by a single sort of love"

- Kabir






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Charles Robinson  
> wrote:
> 
> "What's seen cannot be unseen".

An article in todays WaPo reporting a survey in which people were shown images 
of Obama’s and Trump’s inaugurations. It seems, not surprisingly, that what 
some participants saw was influenced by who they voted for. At least what 
people SAID they saw was not consistent with the images.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

“...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..."

- David Whyte


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:22 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:
> 
> It's worse than ruining that photo for me I went back and now that I know 
> what to look for I see that banding in the lightest parts, that aren't pure 
> white, of several of the images.

I see it in several. Some I’m not sure.

I’m amazed that Charles noticed it. But then I’m blind to a lot of things that 
are apparently obvious to photographers—aberrations and such.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred." 

- Amos Oz


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:19 PM, P. J. Alling  wrote:
> 
> At very high, (for the K20D at least), ISOs  the K20D "grain" pattern takes 
> on a linear look across the sensor.  Not that kind of pattern banding but 
> still it's noticeable it you look for it. I used to hide it by imposing an 
> actual film grain pattern over it in Photoshop.   It could be a 
> characteristic of the chip, or it could be a problem of introduced noise in 
> the electronics the possibilities are endless, though there's probably one 
> that's more likely than any other, I just don't know what it is.   I expect 
> the Fuji engineers know, but they probably won't tell.

The image was shot at ISO 100. RAW format, if that matters.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

“...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..."

- David Whyte


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Gonz  wrote:
> 
> Are you using an *istD?  I had that problem when it got older...  They
> were horizontal lines however.  Was this pic in portrait orientation?

Not a *istD. A Fuji compact—XQ1. The image was in portrait orientation, but 
radically cropped and rotated to the right.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, 
men would die from a great loneliness of spirit." 

- Chief Seattle






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Gonz
Its acid rain from global warming...


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>
>> On 25 Jan 2017, at 22:50, Eric Weir  wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
>>> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg
>>
>> Thanks. Weird. Looks like fabric. I’ll be interested in explanatory 
>> speculations.
>>
>
> I think aliens did it. That's just exo-planetary speculation though.
>
> B
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Bob W-PDML

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 22:50, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
>> 
>> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
>> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg
> 
> Thanks. Weird. Looks like fabric. I’ll be interested in explanatory 
> speculations.
> 

I think aliens did it. That's just exo-planetary speculation though.

B
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:07 PM, Charles Robinson  
> wrote:
> 
> I'll wager the lines line up with his sensor and that the image
> as we see it is rotated somewhat from the original capture. 

The image was cropped—drastically. And rotated to the right.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

“...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..."

- David Whyte


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Gonz
Now its back... wtf?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Gonz  wrote:
> "We're sorry; the page you requested can't be located"
>
> Like they took it down...
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
>> Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
>> https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA
>>
>> Paul via phone
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> -- Reduce your Government Footprint



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Gonz
"We're sorry; the page you requested can't be located"

Like they took it down...


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Paul Stenquist  wrote:
> Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
> https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA
>
> Paul via phone
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts  wrote:
> 
> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg

Thanks. Weird. Looks like fabric. I’ll be interested in explanatory 
speculations.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, 
men would die from a great loneliness of spirit." 

- Chief Seattle






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

KP pre-order

2017-01-25 Thread Paul Stenquist
Adorama is offering it for $1099. Says it replaces K3 II.
https://www.adorama.com/ipxkpb.html?emailprice=t_source=slgt_medium=email_term=Sale_content=Body_campaign=Email012517PentaxNPA

Paul via phone
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread John

I went through all the other images trying to recreate the conditions
under which I could see it, and if it *is* in any of the others, I
couldn't make it visible on my monitor.

On 1/25/2017 4:22 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

It's worse than ruining that photo for me I went back and now that I
know what to look for I see that banding in the lightest parts, that
aren't pure white, of several of the images.


On 1/25/2017 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Eric Weir wrote:


On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

I can see it

Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have
it pointed out to me—how do you explain it?

I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg







--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/25/2017 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Eric Weir wrote:




On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

I can see it


Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it pointed 
out to me—how do you explain it?


I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg



Disturbingly familiar.

http://tinyurl.com/z5s6l9x

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/WqJyBp4FOypsTr2s1GOHjWTscJGcGh44EJGnkKlBBI-APUILO0UnmxxRfrK7kXnBp_PjzMhIwviuR8b9LIhbAsY=s0 



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/25/2017 3:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:



On 25 Jan 2017, at 18:00, John  wrote:


On 1/24/2017 4:18 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
I think young Bozza is right here, echoing Capa - "if your pictures
aren't good enough, you aren't close enough".


OTOH, I knew a guy who liked to use macro lenses to photograph poisonous
snakes. Haven't seen him around in a while.


The poisonous ones are usually not a problem. It's the venomous ones
you really have to watch out for.



I'll tell him that if I ever see him again.


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Charles Robinson
Welcome to my world.  "What's seen cannot be unseen".  Sorry, P.J.!

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:22 PM, P. J. Alling 
wrote:

> It's worse than ruining that photo for me I went back and now that I know
> what to look for I see that banding in the lightest parts, that aren't pure
> white, of several of the images.
>
>
> On 1/25/2017 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

 I can see it

>>> Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it
>>> pointed out to me—how do you explain it?
>>>
>> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
>> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
 -Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
It's worse than ruining that photo for me I went back and now that I 
know what to look for I see that banding in the lightest parts, that 
aren't pure white, of several of the images.



On 1/25/2017 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Eric Weir wrote:


On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

I can see it

Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it pointed 
out to me—how do you explain it?

I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg

  



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
At very high, (for the K20D at least), ISOs  the K20D "grain" pattern 
takes on a linear look across the sensor.  Not that kind of pattern 
banding but still it's noticeable it you look for it. I used to hide it 
by imposing an actual film grain pattern over it in Photoshop.   It 
could be a characteristic of the chip, or it could be a problem of 
introduced noise in the electronics the possibilities are endless, 
though there's probably one that's more likely than any other, I just 
don't know what it is.   I expect the Fuji engineers know, but they 
probably won't tell.



On 1/25/2017 4:07 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:

That's it.  I'll wager the lines line up with his sensor and that the image
as we see it is rotated somewhat from the original capture.  But what would
cause those lines, I have no idea.  My 2MP Olympus 2040Z would do that with
extended exposures (over 2 seconds) but that was a million years ago,
photographically.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Mark Roberts 
wrote:


Eric Weir wrote:


On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

I can see it

Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it

pointed out to me—how do you explain it?

I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg


--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Gonz
Are you using an *istD?  I had that problem when it got older...  They
were horizontal lines however.  Was this pic in portrait orientation?



On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Gonz  wrote:
> Yup, I see em.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Charles Robinson
>  wrote:
>> I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
>> does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
>> banding/lines through the sky on this image?
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731
>>
>> Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>>
>>> >OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
>>> >"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
>>> >disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
>>> >first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
>>> >much, much smaller.
>>>
>>> >> album-72157679473953255/lightbox/>
>>>
>>> >Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>> >Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
>>> >all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
>>> >Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole
>>> story.
>>>
>>> Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
>>> convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> I think this one is actually quite good:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> and this one indicates some grievances:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
>>> I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
>>> group.
>>>
>>> So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
>>> present those 3 or 4 ;-)
>>>
>>> This is fun
>>>
>>> (incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
>>> those above but am working on a fix)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   Cotty
>>>
>>>
>>> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
>>> ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
>>> --
>>> _
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  -Charles
>>
>> --
>> ** Please note my email address has changed **
>> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
>> Minneapolis, MN
>> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> -- Reduce your Government Footprint



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
Well, now that I know what to look for I see it too.   Thanks for 
ruining it for me.



On 1/25/2017 4:04 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Eric Weir wrote:


On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

I can see it

Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it pointed 
out to me—how do you explain it?

I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg

  



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: interesting comparison someone sent me

2017-01-25 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Same with the Leica SL ... There is even a configuration option to disable the 
top-left control button (that you might tap with your nose at eye level with 
the EVF enabled) to prevent accidentally enabling the menu system. :-)

G

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Charles Robinson 
>  wrote:
> 
> Olympus OM-D can be set to automatically toggle between the rear screen and
> the EVF when the eyepiece is close to your face.  It's pretty slick.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:27 AM, P. J. Alling 
> wrote:
> 
>> Unless the camera is smart enough to turn the touch screen off when the
>> camera is to your eye, it becomes a nose pointer, for the cameras AF point
>> selection, and your nose doesn't know, what you want to focus on...
>> 
>> 
>>> On 1/24/2017 2:28 PM, Gonz wrote:
>>> 
>>> It surprises me that the Canon does not have an articulating screen.
>>> Though it is a touch screen.
>>> 
>>> http://cameradecision.com/compare/Pentax-K-1-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Charles
> 
> --
> ** Please note my email address has changed **
> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Gonz
Yup, I see em.


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Charles Robinson
 wrote:
> I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
> does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
> banding/lines through the sky on this image?
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731
>
> Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
>
>> On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>> >OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
>> >"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
>> >disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
>> >first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
>> >much, much smaller.
>>
>> > album-72157679473953255/lightbox/>
>>
>> >Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one
>>
>> .
>>
>> >Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
>> >all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
>> >Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole
>> story.
>>
>> Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
>> convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:
>>
>> 
>>
>> I think this one is actually quite good:
>>
>> 
>>
>> and this one indicates some grievances:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
>> I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
>> group.
>>
>> So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
>> present those 3 or 4 ;-)
>>
>> This is fun
>>
>> (incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
>> those above but am working on a fix)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Cotty
>>
>>
>> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
>> ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
>> --
>> _
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  -Charles
>
> --
> ** Please note my email address has changed **
> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Charles Robinson
That's it.  I'll wager the lines line up with his sensor and that the image
as we see it is rotated somewhat from the original capture.  But what would
cause those lines, I have no idea.  My 2MP Olympus 2040Z would do that with
extended exposures (over 2 seconds) but that was a million years ago,
photographically.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Mark Roberts 
wrote:

> Eric Weir wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> >>
> >> I can see it
> >
> >Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it
> pointed out to me—how do you explain it?
>
> I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
> more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
 -Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Mark Roberts
Eric Weir wrote:

>
>> On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>> 
>> I can see it
>
>Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it 
>pointed out to me—how do you explain it?

I hit it with a dramatic Curves adjustment in Photoshop to make it
more obvious: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/ericweir.jpg

 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Thank you Mr Brewer.

2017-01-25 Thread Igor PDML-StR


Hey, Anthony,
Great to see you back!
"It's so nice to have you back where you belong!"

I hope all more serious issues (health) are back to norm too.

You may or may not have noticed, - there was a recent thread in which
you were implicitly mentioned (in the linked photos). Just in case you 
missed it:

http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg749983.html

:-)

Cheers,

Igor



Anthony Farr Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:08:33 -0800 wrote:

Anyway, the subject was mentioned again a few days ago, today I made an
exploratory reply on a thread, and hey presto! I'M BACK (and couldn't help
shouting it out).
Thanks Doug. I'll try not to be a pest.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

Thanks, Bob.

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> That's a great shot
> 
> B
> 
>> On 25 Jan 2017, at 17:04, Eric Weir  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the “disgustingly 
>> large GESO.” With trepidation because it is still disgustingly large, though 
>> hopefully not so disgustingly large as the first one. I beg forgiveness of 
>> my teachers who would have had it still much, much smaller. 
>> 
>> 
>> Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one 
>> .
>>  Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not all of 
>> photography. Sensibility enters in, and that’s also complex. Perhaps it’s 
>> what Cotty would have had—the one that tells the whole story. 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"Imagining the other is a powerful antidote to fanaticism and hatred." 

- Amos Oz


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> 
> I can see it

Well, for those that see it—I don’t either, but I might have to have it pointed 
out to me—how do you explain it?

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"The invincible shield of caring Is a weapon 
sent from the sky against being dead." 

- Tao Te Ching 67


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Bob W-PDML

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 18:00, John  wrote:
> 
>> On 1/24/2017 4:18 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> I think young Bozza is right here, echoing Capa - "if your pictures
>> aren't good enough, you aren't close enough".
> 
> OTOH, I knew a guy who liked to use macro lenses to photograph poisonous
> snakes. Haven't seen him around in a while.

The poisonous ones are usually not a problem. It's the venomous ones you really 
have to watch out for.

> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Bob W-PDML
I can see it

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 19:17, Charles Robinson  
> wrote:
> 
> You made me doubt myself, so I checked on my iPhone (using Chrome and
> Safari) and it's still there for me.
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Ken Waller  wrote:
>> 
>> Nope.
>> 
>> Kenneth Waller
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>> 
>> - Original Message - From: "Charles Robinson" <
>> charles.robinson...@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Disgustingly large GESO
>> 
>> 
>> I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
>>> does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
>>> banding/lines through the sky on this image?
>>> 
>>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731
>>> 
>>> Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
> OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
> "disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
> disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
> first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
> much, much smaller.
 
 
 
> Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one
 
 .
 
> Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
> all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
> Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole
 story.
 
 Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
 convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:
 
 
 
 I think this one is actually quite good:
 
 
 
 and this one indicates some grievances:
 
 
 
 Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
 I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
 group.
 
 So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
 present those 3 or 4 ;-)
 
 This is fun
 
 (incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
 those above but am working on a fix)
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 
 
 Cheers,
  Cotty
 
 
 ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
 ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
 --
 _
 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -Charles
>>> 
>>> --
>>> ** Please note my email address has changed **
>>> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
>>> Minneapolis, MN
>>> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Charles
> 
> --
> ** Please note my email address has changed **
> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
> 
> Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
> I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small group.
> 
> So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
> present those 3 or 4 ;-)
> 
> This is fun

Thanks, Cotty. Yes it is. I’ve got some catchin’ up to do responding to 
responses on other threads before I accept the challenge, but I may just do it. 
But “Mr. Phelps”? Who he?

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" 

- Mary Oliver 









-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Bob W-PDML
That's a great shot

B

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 17:04, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
> OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the “disgustingly 
> large GESO.” With trepidation because it is still disgustingly large, though 
> hopefully not so disgustingly large as the first one. I beg forgiveness of my 
> teachers who would have had it still much, much smaller. 
> 
> 
> Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one 
> .
>  Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not all of 
> photography. Sensibility enters in, and that’s also complex. Perhaps it’s 
> what Cotty would have had—the one that tells the whole story. 
> 
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread John

Interesting.

On my display I don't see them until I go into "lightbox" and hover the
mouse pointer over the top edge of the photo, creating a kind of dark
gradient. Then they appear almost like a banner, because when I hover
the mouse pointer there, Eric's profile image gets brighter. The banding
is more visible when the "banner" effect is visible.

Also the pointer is a little magnifying glass with a plus sign over most
of the image, but changes to a straight mouse arrow when I get up into
that "banner" area. If I click in the main body with the "+" magnifying
glass, I get a slightly larger image & the "banner" effect goes away.
The vertical banding is barely visible. I can only see it if I hunt for it.

On 1/25/2017 1:53 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:

I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
banding/lines through the sky on this image?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731

Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:


On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:


OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
much, much smaller.





Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one


.


Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole

story.

Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:



I think this one is actually quite good:



and this one indicates some grievances:



Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
group.

So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
present those 3 or 4 ;-)

This is fun

(incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
those above but am working on a fix)





--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
I've got a pretty crappy monitor at this point, since the serious 
illness of my NEC CRT, (damn I miss the color depth and resolution), and 
I don't see any banding, if it were there I'm pretty sure that Dell I'm 
using would accentuate it.



On 1/25/2017 1:53 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:

I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
banding/lines through the sky on this image?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731

Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:


On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:


OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
much, much smaller.




Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one

.


Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole

story.

Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:



I think this one is actually quite good:



and this one indicates some grievances:



Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
group.

So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
present those 3 or 4 ;-)

This is fun

(incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
those above but am working on a fix)





--


Cheers,
   Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Larry Colen



Charles Robinson wrote:

I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
banding/lines through the sky on this image?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731


Yes, I do, it's most noticeable in the clouds that haven't blown out 
like the rest of the sky, and are a few degrees anti-clockwise from 
vertical (left of center?).





Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.




--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Charles Robinson
You made me doubt myself, so I checked on my iPhone (using Chrome and
Safari) and it's still there for me.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Ken Waller  wrote:

> Nope.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Charles Robinson" <
> charles.robinson...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Disgustingly large GESO
>
>
> I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
>> does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
>> banding/lines through the sky on this image?
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731
>>
>> Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell 
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>>
>>> >OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
>>> >"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
>>> >disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
>>> >first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
>>> >much, much smaller.
>>>
>>> >> album-72157679473953255/lightbox/>
>>>
>>> >Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>> >Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
>>> >all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
>>> >Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole
>>> story.
>>>
>>> Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
>>> convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> I think this one is actually quite good:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> and this one indicates some grievances:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
>>> I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
>>> group.
>>>
>>> So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
>>> present those 3 or 4 ;-)
>>>
>>> This is fun
>>>
>>> (incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
>>> those above but am working on a fix)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   Cotty
>>>
>>>
>>> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
>>> ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
>>> --
>>> _
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -Charles
>>
>> --
>> ** Please note my email address has changed **
>> Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
>> Minneapolis, MN
>> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
 -Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: interesting comparison someone sent me

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
I can't remember which new camera actually turns off half the rear 
screen so that you can use the other half to control focus points.  I 
don't know if which half is configurable, but even if it's always the 
left half that's turned off, then for the right eyed that's really slick.


I think it's nice that Olympus makes cameras that look like old school, 
cameras that actually sort of work as new school cameras. They did 
however start with a blank slate, well except for the 4:3 standard, 
which allowed them to build anything they actually wanted.   It's easy 
if you don't need to avoid offending a user base that expects a certain 
level of backward compatibility.


On 1/25/2017 1:43 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:

Olympus OM-D can be set to automatically toggle between the rear screen and
the EVF when the eyepiece is close to your face.  It's pretty slick.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:27 AM, P. J. Alling 
wrote:


Unless the camera is smart enough to turn the touch screen off when the
camera is to your eye, it becomes a nose pointer, for the cameras AF point
selection, and your nose doesn't know, what you want to focus on...


On 1/24/2017 2:28 PM, Gonz wrote:


It surprises me that the Canon does not have an articulating screen.
Though it is a touch screen.

http://cameradecision.com/compare/Pentax-K-1-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Exposure compensation: don't optimize for the wrong thing

2017-01-25 Thread Larry Colen



Ken Waller wrote:

I've found on my K-3, K20d and K10, in some cases, the individual
channels - R, G, B need to be reviewed separately on the in camera
histogram to prevent blow out of details in that specific channel,
especially R.


Exactly.  I learned that early on when photographing flowers. Any photo 
that has a lot of light in any one of the channels is in severe danger 
of blowing out that channel. The light meter looks at an average of all 
light, so if you are shooting a scene that is mostly one color, and 
fairly brightly lit, the metering will be based on all three channels 
and will overexpose for that one color.


These days, in dynamic lighting conditions, I tend to shoot Tav, with 
compensation set a bit under exposed (one to three stops) because with 
ISO invariance I'm better underexposing than clipping.


This ties into the thread on cropping in that I think that I've lost 
more photos due to optimizing for the wrong thing, than anything else. 
I'll try to not push the ISO too hard, and will end up with too slow of 
a shutter speed.  I'll try to shoot action so that I don't need to crop, 
and end up with what would be a great photo, except for the virtual 
amputation of a subject's limbs.  I think that just about every engineer 
is painfully familiar with the problems of optimizing for the wrong 
things, programmers that spend two weeks optimizing code that hardly 
ever runs, and ignoring the loops where the computer spends most of it's 
time.  Or worse, spending all that time optimizing that one section of 
code, and missing the deadline.


--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/24/2017 6:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

I see it as a habit from the days of 35mm film, which was really
meaningful in digital before the explosion of megapixels.  35mm was a
rather low fidelity imaging source.  If you wanted a reasonable sized
print, with good detail, using a reasonably fast film, (varied with the
era but in the age of Tri-X ASA 400), depending on subject matter you
could get a decent 8x10 cropping at most 1/3-1/2 of the frame.  This was
decent by the standards of the day, today it would be considered awful
with lots of lost detail.  Today with a 16mp camera cropping away 2/3 of
the frame, (and assuming reasonable technique and a decent lens), you've
still got more data to play with than people had with early 2-4mp
DSLRs.  If only processing for the web, crop away, I say.




I still have a Nikon CoolScan IV ED with a max scan resolution of 2900
ppi; giving just over 10MP for the images - about the same as the K10D.
I scan 35mm slides & negatives using VueScan x64. I've managed to get
decent prints up to 16"x20" from scanned negatives (modern digital
hybrid C-print printers can give "acceptable" results down to 150 ppi).

I bought the Nikon scanner back in early 2003 because I didn't know when
Pentax might have a DSLR available (not being involved with PDML then I
had no clue where to look for Pentax rumors) ...

Or whether I was going to be able to afford one when they did.

The Nikon CoolScan was my back door into digital photography using a
Pentax film camera.


On 1/24/2017 6:11 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:

On 24/1/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:


I try not to crop very drastically

I simply don't understand this - either one crops or one doesn't. How is
it that more cropping (supposedly) equals being drastic?

Not being facetious, just fancy tempting some more prose out of you ;-)






--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/24/2017 7:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:


Rhetoric. "Hacking away at something in the hope of finding a decent
picture" vs. judiciously working to perfect the photo in post. Adams
is said to have done his best work in the darkroom, whereas HCB
turned over his film to someone else. All strategies are valid if the
results are pleasing.


With the understanding that what pleases me may not please you and vice
versa.

Or him, or her, or ...


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Ken Waller

Nope.

Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "Charles Robinson" 

Subject: Re: Disgustingly large GESO



I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
banding/lines through the sky on this image?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731

Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  
wrote:



On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:

>OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
>"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
>disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
>first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
>much, much smaller.



>Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one

.

>Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
>all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
>Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole
story.

Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:



I think this one is actually quite good:



and this one indicates some grievances:



Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
group.

So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
present those 3 or 4 ;-)

This is fun

(incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
those above but am working on a fix)





--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_


--
-Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Carlton Beach

2017-01-25 Thread Charles Robinson
Looks very pleasant.  Tons nicer than here in the US Midwest right now!

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Philip Northeast 
wrote:

> Summer's day at Carlton Beach
>
> https://flic.kr/p/RwW8Ca
>
> Pentax K1  & Sigma 35mm f1.4mm art lens
>
> --
> Philip Northeast
>
> www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
 -Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Ken Waller

I knew a guy who liked to use macro lenses to photograph poisonous
snakes. Haven't seen him around in a while.


Sounds like he was asping for trouble.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "John" 

Subject: Re: Cropping



On 1/24/2017 4:18 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:

I think young Bozza is right here, echoing Capa - "if your pictures
aren't good enough, you aren't close enough".


OTOH, I knew a guy who liked to use macro lenses to photograph poisonous
snakes. Haven't seen him around in a while.


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Charles Robinson
I think this is the only image doing it, and maybe it's just me, but...
does anyone else see a series of parallel, almost-straight-up-and-down
banding/lines through the sky on this image?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/32348360731

Looks almost like watermarking, but not really.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:

> On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
> >"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
> >disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
> >first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
> >much, much smaller.
>
>  album-72157679473953255/lightbox/>
>
> >Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one
>
> .
>
> >Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
> >all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
> >Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole
> story.
>
> Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
> convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:
>
> 
>
> I think this one is actually quite good:
>
> 
>
> and this one indicates some grievances:
>
> 
>
> Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
> I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small
> group.
>
> So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
> present those 3 or 4 ;-)
>
> This is fun
>
> (incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
> those above but am working on a fix)
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
> ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
> --
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
 -Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Exposure compensation

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling

Didn't I say that, possibly poorly?


On 1/25/2017 12:48 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

Actually EV compensation affects manual mode by changing how the meter
reads out. So putting settings that "match the needle" in will reflect
your compensation amount. Also the green button will reset to the
program line with compensation if it is engaged.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:

On 24/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:


I've been puzzled by this. How does it work? There are only three
variables--sensitivity, aperture, shutter speed. Doesn't it have to
adjust one of those? Then what's with a separate function?

If you use your camera on fully manual settings (ISO, iris, shutter
speed) then exposure compensation is not relevant.

If you are using an automatic setting (eg program, aperture value,
shutter value) then the suggested exposure by the camera may not appeal
to you. Hence you can adjust the camera's 'thought' on what it thinks is
the right exposure for your scene.

Think of sitting on a bus. You paid your ticket and chose your seat,
you've paid for your bag and all is good. It should be a perfect trip.
But you decide that the driver is going too fast for your liking - he
has a dial on his back that you can turn either way to make him slow
down - or go faster!

Of course, there may be any number of reasons why the camera's own
thoughts on the exposure in hand isn't right. With me, it's usually
because a scene is backlit and the subject is too dark. Turning the dial
in the '+' direction overexposes what the camera thinks is right,
allowing more light in, but in doing so my subject becomes better exposed.

Hope this helps :-)

--


Cheers,
   Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: interesting comparison someone sent me

2017-01-25 Thread Charles Robinson
Olympus OM-D can be set to automatically toggle between the rear screen and
the EVF when the eyepiece is close to your face.  It's pretty slick.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:27 AM, P. J. Alling 
wrote:

> Unless the camera is smart enough to turn the touch screen off when the
> camera is to your eye, it becomes a nose pointer, for the cameras AF point
> selection, and your nose doesn't know, what you want to focus on...
>
>
> On 1/24/2017 2:28 PM, Gonz wrote:
>
>> It surprises me that the Canon does not have an articulating screen.
>> Though it is a touch screen.
>>
>> http://cameradecision.com/compare/Pentax-K-1-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV
>>
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
 -Charles

--
** Please note my email address has changed **
Charles Robinson - charles.robinson...@gmail.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: interesting comparison someone sent me

2017-01-25 Thread Igor PDML-StR


This is an interesting comparison, but it is a bit narrow-focused: it 
looks only at the specs, but does not involve the performance.

It also makes some mistakes in the analysis of the specs.


The first question that pops in my mind after reading this comparison: 
has anybody who suggests that K-1 might be better for sports compared the 
the AF performance? Those might be on par with each other, but given the 
history of Pentax's AF lagging behind that of other "big" brand(s), I 
would not assume that fact, unless there is a good proof of that.


Second, they didn't do a good job about the comparison.
As a matter of fact, it looks someone has an agenda in that comparison. 
And that dictates the conclusions _despite_ the facts, not based on them.


The most glaring example (besides the aforementioned AF): how is Pentax 
"excellent" for Daily Photography, while Canon is only good, while the 
features shown in the comparison table show Pentax being worse: 1. 
heavier, 2. thicker (with the rest being equal).

They've got it backwards!

(Actually, the weakness of Canon in that department it's length, not 
thickness! But they omitted that part.)


And there are many other factors (even those that they've mentioned) that 
they excluded from the consideration. E.g. they compare the availability 
of lenses. (Never mind the comparison of their quality!)
Just by looking at the numbers, - CAnon has many more wide-angle zooms and 
primes. Shouldn't that affect that suitability for landscape photography?
The same disparity in the telephoto department: shouldn't that affect the 
suitability for sports photography?
I am not suggesting which camera is better from the lens' point of view, - 
I am just saying that the comparison could be deeper. And I understand 
that it would require a much bigger effort then just massaging the 
published specs.



So, it is a rather shallow and in some aspects flawed comparison (or as it 
is fashionable to say today: "rigged" ;-) ).


Nonetheless, thanks for posting the link, it is interesting to look at 
this comparison.


Cheers,

Igor



On 1/24/2017 2:28 PM, Gonz wrote:


It surprises me that the Canon does not have an articulating screen.
Though it is a touch screen.

http://cameradecision.com/compare/Pentax-K-1-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Alan C

You made my day! He obviously didn't believe in cropping!

Alan C

-Original Message- 
From: John

Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 7:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Cropping

On 1/24/2017 4:18 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:

I think young Bozza is right here, echoing Capa - "if your pictures
aren't good enough, you aren't close enough".


OTOH, I knew a guy who liked to use macro lenses to photograph poisonous
snakes. Haven't seen him around in a while.


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Alan C
Igor & Larry, your summaries are spot on. I think most of us went through 
those phases. I used to make composite B/W prints too (cut & paste!). 
Perhaps panos can be described as reverse cropping? Zooms & post-processing 
now virtually give free licence as long as you have enough pixels to begin 
with. A 50% K1 crop still leaves more pixels than the K7 & 3x as many as a 
K110D! When I used the K110D I tried hard to get it right on site. With the 
K7 I am a somewhat lackadaisical. If I was fortunate enough to have a K3 or 
K1, who knows?


Alan C

-Original Message- 
From: Igor PDML-StR

Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 6:51 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Cropping


Having started photographing with a camera with a single fixed and
non-changable lens, I was forced to crop during printing (which I was
doing myself).
 Then, when switched to slides (and a DSLR, albeit only with one "normal"
prime), I've learned to frame for the ultimate presentation. Using
commercial mini-labs for printing photos (when those became accessible for
me), reinforced that habit.

The era of digital photography (and the advances of digital printing) has
relaxed that requirement for me from two points of view:
1. I can do my own cropping on the computer, and
2. I can print color photos myself easily.

Now, I am forcing myself to frame a bit more loose. This is for the
reasons that Larry (and a few others) have explained: to make
sure some body parts are not cut off, and I have
the room for horizon adjustment or perspective correction).
It doesn't happen always: old habits are hard to break.

There is one more good reason for unavoidable cropping: when I am printing
photos, the formats I use the most are 5x7, 8.5x11 (Letter), sometimes 4x6
and 8x10. All those have a different aspect ratio. So, cropping from the
2x3 ratio sensor of Pentax DSLRs is unavoidable.


When photographing an event where I am expecting to post large quantity
of photos (e.g. kids events), I still try to frame to the ultimate
presentation, -- to minimize the work I need to do on the large volume of
photos.

But even when I do that, I frequently adjust the crop here and there, and
I also frequently crop to change the aspect ratio (e.g. to get 1:1).

Now, there is a merit behind the advice of people who categorically swear
against cropping: trying to make the final framing while you are shooting
encourages a more careful approach for each shot. It develops and improves
one's skill of creative viewing.


So, the bottom line:
You should not listen to people who tell you should not do something "just
because". Always evaluate the merits.

Eric, in regards to cropping:
 1. Try your best while framing to avoid cropping in post.

 2. In post-production, - crop whatever is necessary. Pay attention to how
you are cropping (and more importantly why), - and use that as a feedback
for #1.

HTH,

Igor


Larry Colen Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:05:53 -0800 wrote:

In theory, filling the frame with exactly what you need and not cropping
will give you the very best image possible. However, with my K-1, even if
I throw away half the area of the image, I'm still left with an 18MP APS
sized chunk of sensor that I can take from any place in the image.


If I am shooting a landscape, still life, or some other static image, I'll
do my best to frame things exactly. However, if I'm shooting dancing,
martial arts or some other very dynamic scene, I will often shoot loose
and crop tight. It is my experience that I lose far fewer photos from a
slight loss of resolution than I do because just as I pressed the trigger
someone stuck their hand, foot, or even their head outside of the frame
that I'm shooting.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Boris Liberman
Thank you, Old Bozza.

I should add that in the past one could probably say that I was
obsessed with not cropping to a certain extent. If Eric wants to crop
less, he can do either what you suggest and read some serious texts on
the matter, or he can simply practice something like nifty-fifty for a
while, or both. I mean - I'd rather give the man practical advise that
may have a pleasant side effect to having some wholesome fun.

Nowadays, I am starting (it really takes me very long time) to see the
picture the way I'd like to process it before I actually take a shot.
This is even greater fun. Sometimes, I take a picture and change my
mind during editing. But I normally don't crop too much. Maybe just a
bit around the borders, in case I missed some unwanted element or
deliberately took a shot having the crop pre-planned. The most often
case it happens, is when I plan to edit the picture into 16:9 ratio.
In fact, my camera has a nice property of variable frame ratios, while
the actual RAW file contains all the pixels that were scanned by the
sensor.

Anyways, trying to limit oneself with some meaningful limitation can
in fact be both enjoyable and educational.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> I think young Bozza is right here, echoing Capa - "if your pictures aren't 
> good enough, you aren't close enough".
>
> It's you who decides whether or not your pictures are good enough, and your 
> question suggests that perhaps you do think that.
>
> Cartier-Bresson was famous for (almost) never cropping, and the reason for 
> this was that he had a very highly developed eye for composition, and that he 
> shot that composition within the framelines of his camera, so any cropping 
> would ruin the composition.
>
> This was a discipline he chose for himself, along with the less strict rules 
> of only shooting black & white, and only using a 50mm lens. By doing this he 
> consciously restricted the type of photographs he would take, and reduced the 
> variables, thus simplifying and maintaining control.
>
> The result was a genius. This approach has been used numerous times in the 
> past in different arts. Consider for example the theatre of Corneille, which 
> obeyed the classical unities, was written in Alexandrine couplets, and dealt 
> with classical heroic themes. Less is more.
>
> If you do feel that your pictures are not good enough, I would recommend 
> studying composition,  doing exercises the way people do scales for the 
> piano, and reducing the number of variables you have to deal with, so that 
> you can really focus at the time of shooting on what interests you in the 
> image, and use the principles of composition within the frame to bring that 
> to the fore.
>
> The way learn composition is to learn about proportion and grids, and to 
> learn to recognise it when you see it, so you can photograph it. Then you 
> won't need to crop much.
>
> Two Magnum photographers I really like, who shoot fantastically good, complex 
> compositions, are Harry Gruyaert and Alex Webb. There used to be a whole load 
> of stuff showing grids overlaid on their work, discussing the composition, 
> but it all seems to go to something called pinterest now, usual bullshit of 
> closing the web. But google their names with 'composition grid' and you might 
> find something helpful.
>
> I try not to crop very drastically, mainly to straighten horizons or 
> verticals when I use the full frame, or to use either square or double-square 
> (tatami mat) when I see something that suits those formats. I used to shoot 
> slides a lot, and didn't have the luxury of cropping. Again, limiting the 
> variables.
>
> This guy has some interesting ideas on his blog:
> http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2016/01/27/100-lessons-from-the-masters-of-street-photography/
>
> B
>
>
> On 24 Jan 2017, at 14:27, Boris Liberman 
> > wrote:
>
> Absolutely terrible. Please kindly stand in the corner for 5 mins.
>
> Seriously, maybe you can walk closer to your subjects should conditions
> permit...
>
> On 24 Jan 2017 15:37, "Eric Weir" 
> > wrote:
>
>
> I crop often. Sometimes radically. To focus more clearly on what interests
> me in the image. Am I a terrible photographer?
>
> 
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
>
> "Man has been a murderer forever."
>
> - Peter Matthiessen.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link 

Re: Exposure compensation

2017-01-25 Thread Ken Waller
I've found on my K-3, K20d and K10, in some cases, the individual channels - 
R, G, B need to be reviewed separately on the in camera histogram to prevent 
blow out of details in that specific channel, especially R.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "P. J. Alling" 

Subject: Re: Exposure compensation


On Pentax cameras, at least, the histogram is being generated from the 
embedded, or generated, in the case of live view, jpeg. So you can afford 
and might even want some clipping of highlights if you're shooting raw. 
How much would depend on the jpeg camera settings since those directly 
effect the histogram.



On 1/25/2017 12:41 PM, John wrote:

On 1/24/2017 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:



Bruce Walker wrote:

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Larry Colen  wrote:

Also, there are different exposure methodologies.  [...]
If you're shooting raw, then you generally want to "expose
to the right", in order to preserve the highlights,


Come again? ETTR actually endangers highlights. It's the shadows that
ETTR is supposed to help with. I sometimes ETTL to avoid clipping
highlights and so preserve them--the exact opposite direction.


OK, I probably used the wrong term for looking at the histogram and
making sure that the tail of it goes as far to the right as possible
WITHOUT CLIPPING.  If making sure that the brightest highlights are just
short of clipping is Expose to the left, then that is what I do.



That's how ETTR (Expose To The Right?) was explained to me ... get the
histogram as far toward the highlight side as you can without clipping.

The shape of the Rock of Gibraltar as seen from the Mediterranean Sea
(east face) is an example of what I understand to be a good ETTR 
histogram.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/24/2017 4:18 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:

I think young Bozza is right here, echoing Capa - "if your pictures
aren't good enough, you aren't close enough".


OTOH, I knew a guy who liked to use macro lenses to photograph poisonous
snakes. Haven't seen him around in a while.


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: interesting comparison someone sent me

2017-01-25 Thread John

For me it's a legacy of my days running a mini-lab & trying to keep the
order kiosk screens clean.

I never felt I needed to use protective gloves when handling prints in
the darkroom, but I damn sure did whenever I went to clean the kiosk
screens. And NOT from the glass cleaner I had to use either!

Does no one ever wash their hands any more?

On 1/25/2017 10:23 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:

Yeah. Ever pulled out a smartphone in the dead of winter when it's
-15C with a -25C windchill and tried to use the touch screen? After
you pull off your gloves and your fingers start to freeze you discover
that dry skin fails to register.

Give me buttons and dials.


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:04 AM, John  wrote:

The touch screen is not a really big selling point for me since I hate
touch screens.

On 1/24/2017 2:28 PM, Gonz wrote:


It surprises me that the Canon does not have an articulating screen.
Though it is a touch screen.

http://cameradecision.com/compare/Pentax-K-1-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV








--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Exposure compensation

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling
On Pentax cameras, at least, the histogram is being generated from the 
embedded, or generated, in the case of live view, jpeg. So you can 
afford and might even want some clipping of highlights if you're 
shooting raw.  How much would depend on the jpeg camera settings since 
those directly effect the histogram.



On 1/25/2017 12:41 PM, John wrote:

On 1/24/2017 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:



Bruce Walker wrote:

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Larry Colen  wrote:

Also, there are different exposure methodologies.  [...]
If you're shooting raw, then you generally want to "expose
to the right", in order to preserve the highlights,


Come again? ETTR actually endangers highlights. It's the shadows that
ETTR is supposed to help with. I sometimes ETTL to avoid clipping
highlights and so preserve them--the exact opposite direction.


OK, I probably used the wrong term for looking at the histogram and
making sure that the tail of it goes as far to the right as possible
WITHOUT CLIPPING.  If making sure that the brightest highlights are just
short of clipping is Expose to the left, then that is what I do.



That's how ETTR (Expose To The Right?) was explained to me ... get the
histogram as far toward the highlight side as you can without clipping.

The shape of the Rock of Gibraltar as seen from the Mediterranean Sea
(east face) is an example of what I understand to be a good ETTR 
histogram.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Exposure compensation

2017-01-25 Thread Zos Xavius
Actually EV compensation affects manual mode by changing how the meter
reads out. So putting settings that "match the needle" in will reflect
your compensation amount. Also the green button will reset to the
program line with compensation if it is engaged.

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
> On 24/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I've been puzzled by this. How does it work? There are only three
>>variables--sensitivity, aperture, shutter speed. Doesn't it have to
>>adjust one of those? Then what's with a separate function?
>
> If you use your camera on fully manual settings (ISO, iris, shutter
> speed) then exposure compensation is not relevant.
>
> If you are using an automatic setting (eg program, aperture value,
> shutter value) then the suggested exposure by the camera may not appeal
> to you. Hence you can adjust the camera's 'thought' on what it thinks is
> the right exposure for your scene.
>
> Think of sitting on a bus. You paid your ticket and chose your seat,
> you've paid for your bag and all is good. It should be a perfect trip.
> But you decide that the driver is going too fast for your liking - he
> has a dial on his back that you can turn either way to make him slow
> down - or go faster!
>
> Of course, there may be any number of reasons why the camera's own
> thoughts on the exposure in hand isn't right. With me, it's usually
> because a scene is backlit and the subject is too dark. Turning the dial
> in the '+' direction overexposes what the camera thinks is right,
> allowing more light in, but in doing so my subject becomes better exposed.
>
> Hope this helps :-)
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
> ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
> --
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO -- Salt marsh with open water.

2017-01-25 Thread John

It's also known as a tidal marsh; regularly flooded at high tide - the
grasses are salt tolerant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_marsh

On 1/17/2017 11:31 PM, Alan C wrote:

Nice composition PJ. It can't be too salty with that amount of grass. I
have that lens - perhaps it needs an outing? I tend to use the HD 55-300
90% of the time.

Alan C

-Original Message- From: P. J. Alling
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 10:31 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- Salt marsh with open water.

Winter scene, brown grass, rocks, sand, a little snow, and very cold water.

https://pdml.updog.co/webster26/PESO%20--%20marshstream.html

Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6

As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Exposure compensation

2017-01-25 Thread John

On 1/24/2017 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:



Bruce Walker wrote:

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Larry Colen  wrote:

Also, there are different exposure methodologies.  [...]
If you're shooting raw, then you generally want to "expose
to the right", in order to preserve the highlights,


Come again? ETTR actually endangers highlights. It's the shadows that
ETTR is supposed to help with. I sometimes ETTL to avoid clipping
highlights and so preserve them--the exact opposite direction.


OK, I probably used the wrong term for looking at the histogram and
making sure that the tail of it goes as far to the right as possible
WITHOUT CLIPPING.  If making sure that the brightest highlights are just
short of clipping is Expose to the left, then that is what I do.



That's how ETTR (Expose To The Right?) was explained to me ... get the
histogram as far toward the highlight side as you can without clipping.

The shape of the Rock of Gibraltar as seen from the Mediterranean Sea
(east face) is an example of what I understand to be a good ETTR histogram.


--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 25/1/17, Eric Weir, discombobulated, unleashed:

>OK, again with trepidation I share a revised version of the
>"disgustingly large GESO." With trepidation because it is still
>disgustingly large, though hopefully not so disgustingly large as the
>first one. I beg forgiveness of my teachers who would have had it still
>much, much smaller. 



>Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one

.

>Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not
>all of photography. Sensibility enters in, and that's also complex.
>Perhaps it's what Cotty would have had--the one that tells the whole story. 

Yes, I like that one but my only reservation is that it doesn't easily
convey the anti-Trump rally. This one does but perhaps not as strong:



I think this one is actually quite good:



and this one indicates some grievances:



Overall I think there is no single picture which grabs me by the neck -
I think there are probably 3 or 4 which will tell the story as a small group.

So now your task, should you decide to accept it Mr Phelps, is to
present those 3 or 4 ;-)

This is fun

(incidentally my email app constantly breaks long URLs - I've shortened
those above but am working on a fix)





-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Disgustingly large GESO

2017-01-25 Thread Eric Weir

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> Hard to pick a favorite, but if forced it might be this one 
> .
>  Perhaps for nontechnical reasons, but then technique is not all of 
> photography. Sensibility enters in, and that’s also complex. Perhaps it’s 
> what Cotty would have had—the one that tells the whole story.

Venturing off from photography here, if it’s got the whole story what’s the 
story? Joyful resistance.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"Our world is a human world." 

- Hilary Putnam






-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread P. J. Alling

He never makes mistakes and don't call him Shirley.


On 1/25/2017 11:33 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:

On 25/1/17, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:


I read Stan's comment as a bit of a toungue in cheek

Surely shome mishtake ;-)




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cropping

2017-01-25 Thread Ken Waller
Igor, I'm pretty much in the same boat - I almost exclusively shot shot 
slides for enjoyment (and print film for work) and didn't have the luxury of 
cropping except when making prints.


I totally agree with your comment - "trying to make the final framing while 
you are shooting
encourages a more careful approach for each shot. It develops and improves 
one's skill of creative viewing"


That's not to say don't crop. Cropping has improved alot of my images.

As has been stated in this thread - its the image you show that matters - 
cropped or not.


Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller

- Original Message - 
From: "Igor PDML-StR" 

Subject: Re: Cropping





Having started photographing with a camera with a single fixed and 
non-changable lens, I was forced to crop during printing (which I was 
doing myself).
 Then, when switched to slides (and a DSLR, albeit only with one "normal" 
prime), I've learned to frame for the ultimate presentation. Using 
commercial mini-labs for printing photos (when those became accessible for 
me), reinforced that habit.


The era of digital photography (and the advances of digital printing) has 
relaxed that requirement for me from two points of view:

1. I can do my own cropping on the computer, and
2. I can print color photos myself easily.

Now, I am forcing myself to frame a bit more loose. This is for the 
reasons that Larry (and a few others) have explained: to make sure some 
body parts are not cut off, and I have the room for horizon adjustment or 
perspective correction).

It doesn't happen always: old habits are hard to break.

There is one more good reason for unavoidable cropping: when I am printing 
photos, the formats I use the most are 5x7, 8.5x11 (Letter), sometimes 4x6 
and 8x10. All those have a different aspect ratio. So, cropping from the 
2x3 ratio sensor of Pentax DSLRs is unavoidable.



When photographing an event where I am expecting to post large quantity of 
photos (e.g. kids events), I still try to frame to the ultimate 
presentation, -- to minimize the work I need to do on the large volume of 
photos.


But even when I do that, I frequently adjust the crop here and there, and 
I also frequently crop to change the aspect ratio (e.g. to get 1:1).


Now, there is a merit behind the advice of people who categorically swear 
against cropping: .
trying to make the final framing while you are shooting encourages a more 
careful approach for each shot. It develops and improves one's skill of 
creative viewing


So, the bottom line:
You should not listen to people who tell you should not do something "just 
because". Always evaluate the merits.


Eric, in regards to cropping:
 1. Try your best while framing to avoid cropping in post.

 2. In post-production, - crop whatever is necessary. Pay attention to how 
you are cropping (and more importantly why), - and use that as a feedback 
for #1.


HTH,

Igor


Larry Colen Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:05:53 -0800 wrote:

In theory, filling the frame with exactly what you need and not cropping 
will give you the very best image possible. However, with my K-1, even if 
I throw away half the area of the image, I'm still left with an 18MP APS 
sized chunk of sensor that I can take from any place in the image.



If I am shooting a landscape, still life, or some other static image, I'll 
do my best to frame things exactly. However, if I'm shooting dancing, 
martial arts or some other very dynamic scene, I will often shoot loose 
and crop tight. It is my experience that I lose far fewer photos from a 
slight loss of resolution than I do because just as I pressed the trigger 
someone stuck their hand, foot, or even their head outside of the frame 
that I'm shooting.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


  1   2   >