Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only
Yeah that would work, the action is there then gone quickly too giving the buffer time to refresh. A lot of my shoots are pretty intense, dance, fire and music shows. The fire stuff is over pretty quickly and you need to overshoot to get a few decent frames it's happening so fast. A lot of music pr teams now only give you the first three songs and for some reason often poor lighting really limiting opportunities during the allotted press time. On 18 February 2018 at 12:28, Paul Stenquist wrote: > I shoot football and baseball with the K-1 and never fill the buffer, but I > rarely shoot more than three or four frames in a burst and take a lot of > singles. > > Paul > >> On Feb 17, 2018, at 7:56 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: >> >> The K1 to me is an ideal portrait/landscape camera, not so great for >> events, the fact that they managed to deliver the trio of pro-spec >> zooms at launch was admirable but they seem a miss match for the body. >> >> A couple of high quality portable primes (the 15-30 is a great lens, I >> have the Tamron version but it's huge and weighty) to satisfy >> traditional landscape and portrait shooters should have at least >> closely followed the launch of the three f2.8 zoom lenses IMO. >> >> I needed a new solution to cover my events shooting with better speed >> and low light performance (was previously using K3/K3/K5iis >> combination) but I knew that the K1 buffer would limit its usefulness >> to me so I finally jumped ship. I would have stuck around for another >> 5 plus years on top of my 30 or so if they had produced a K3/ii >> replacement in a timely fashion. >> >> >> >>> On 17 February 2018 at 09:20, Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> I don’t expect Pentax to be able to compete with Fuji in resources. But Im >>> happy with my gear. It would probably serve me well for the rest of my >>> days, although I will upgrade if I see something I like. >>> >>> Paul >>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: Compare to the GFX. In 2017 Fuji released 6 lenses for the system. And that's not even counting all the other lenses they have released in the past year from X mount to cinema lenses. Pentax designed 2 whole lenses for the K-1. The 100-450 and 70-200. And it took them over 2 years just to come up with a 50mm? huh? Yeah, not really feeling all that optimistic about their future right now.. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> >> -- >> Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) >> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours >> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only
I shoot football and baseball with the K-1 and never fill the buffer, but I rarely shoot more than three or four frames in a burst and take a lot of singles. Paul > On Feb 17, 2018, at 7:56 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > > The K1 to me is an ideal portrait/landscape camera, not so great for > events, the fact that they managed to deliver the trio of pro-spec > zooms at launch was admirable but they seem a miss match for the body. > > A couple of high quality portable primes (the 15-30 is a great lens, I > have the Tamron version but it's huge and weighty) to satisfy > traditional landscape and portrait shooters should have at least > closely followed the launch of the three f2.8 zoom lenses IMO. > > I needed a new solution to cover my events shooting with better speed > and low light performance (was previously using K3/K3/K5iis > combination) but I knew that the K1 buffer would limit its usefulness > to me so I finally jumped ship. I would have stuck around for another > 5 plus years on top of my 30 or so if they had produced a K3/ii > replacement in a timely fashion. > > > >> On 17 February 2018 at 09:20, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> I don’t expect Pentax to be able to compete with Fuji in resources. But Im >> happy with my gear. It would probably serve me well for the rest of my days, >> although I will upgrade if I see something I like. >> >> Paul >> >>> On Feb 16, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: >>> >>> Compare to the GFX. In 2017 Fuji released 6 lenses for the system. And >>> that's not even counting all the other lenses they have released in >>> the past year from X mount to cinema lenses. Pentax designed 2 whole >>> lenses for the K-1. The 100-450 and 70-200. And it took them over 2 >>> years just to come up with a 50mm? huh? Yeah, not really feeling all >>> that optimistic about their future right now.. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only
The K1 to me is an ideal portrait/landscape camera, not so great for events, the fact that they managed to deliver the trio of pro-spec zooms at launch was admirable but they seem a miss match for the body. A couple of high quality portable primes (the 15-30 is a great lens, I have the Tamron version but it's huge and weighty) to satisfy traditional landscape and portrait shooters should have at least closely followed the launch of the three f2.8 zoom lenses IMO. I needed a new solution to cover my events shooting with better speed and low light performance (was previously using K3/K3/K5iis combination) but I knew that the K1 buffer would limit its usefulness to me so I finally jumped ship. I would have stuck around for another 5 plus years on top of my 30 or so if they had produced a K3/ii replacement in a timely fashion. On 17 February 2018 at 09:20, Paul Stenquist wrote: > I don’t expect Pentax to be able to compete with Fuji in resources. But Im > happy with my gear. It would probably serve me well for the rest of my days, > although I will upgrade if I see something I like. > > Paul > >> On Feb 16, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Zos Xavius wrote: >> >> Compare to the GFX. In 2017 Fuji released 6 lenses for the system. And >> that's not even counting all the other lenses they have released in >> the past year from X mount to cinema lenses. Pentax designed 2 whole >> lenses for the K-1. The 100-450 and 70-200. And it took them over 2 >> years just to come up with a 50mm? huh? Yeah, not really feeling all >> that optimistic about their future right now.. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Mystery focusing screen
> On Feb 17, 2018, at 4:31 PM, John wrote: > >> On 2/17/2018 14:55, Eric Weir wrote: >> As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering >> things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case >> from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed in the >> camera. Inside was another focusing screen, a bracketed one, in a sealed >> plastic sleeve. I don’t know where this came from. Only two possibilities: >> it was included with the Katzeye screen—unlikely I’m thinking—or it came >> with the camera. >> Anyone know which it would be? > > Could it be the original focusing screen the Katzeye screen replaced? That’s what I First thought, but it’s in a sealed plastic sleeve. Never been opened. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: Cardinal
Actually, it is camouflage, as these fish live in relatively deep water, where the red will not be bright or ever really lreddish. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > Conspicuous camo. ?? HA! > > J > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 11, 2018, at 11:38 PM, Daniel J. Matyola > wrote: > > > > Ochre-striped cardinalfish from the Maui Ocean Center: > > > > http://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas- > pesos/2018/2/12/cardinal-fish > > > > K-5 IIs, DA 18-135 > > Comments are invited. > > > > Dan Matyola > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Mystery focusing screen
On 2/17/2018 14:55, Eric Weir wrote: As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed in the camera. Inside was another focusing screen, a bracketed one, in a sealed plastic sleeve. I don’t know where this came from. Only two possibilities: it was included with the Katzeye screen—unlikely I’m thinking—or it came with the camera. Anyone know which it would be? Could it be the original focusing screen the Katzeye screen replaced? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018
Most years I do struggle to find any that I am really confident about submitting. Last year, I had the Blue and Beige image from Santa Fe, which was a no-brainer, but nothing stood out like that for me this year, so I agonized for quite a while. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 2:30 PM, John wrote: > I know how you feel. I struggle every year to select three that are good > enough to submit. > > Except for the first year, the photo Mark selected was not the one I > considered the best of my submissions. > > > On 2/17/2018 13:32, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > >> As I understand the rules, at least one has to be included. Otherwise, I >> would never have made any of the annuals! >> >> >> Dan Matyola >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >> >> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Boris Liberman >> wrote: >> >> Well, I've just uploaded 3 pics for the book. >>> >>> Let's see if any of them makes it :-). >>> >>> > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Mystery focusing screen
> On Feb 17, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Eric Weir wrote: > > As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering > things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case > from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed in the > camera. Inside was another focusing screen, a bracketed one, in a sealed > plastic sleeve. I don’t know where this came from. Only two possibilities: it > was included with the Katzeye screen—unlikely I’m thinking—or it came with > the camera. > > Anyone know which it would be? Judging from the options displayed on this page, it’s what this company calls an “S-TYPE Focusing Screen (AF Frame).” https://www.focusingscreen.com/index.php?cPath=25_113&osCsid=3e1cbf8b325d66a47f8b788a76debbb2 The label on the Katzeye case says “Pentax AF Area Brackets: No.” So it would appear that this an optional screen with AF area brackets that came with the camera. Is that right? -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net "What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?" - Mary Oliver -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Mystery focusing screen
As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed in the camera. Inside was another focusing screen, a bracketed one, in a sealed plastic sleeve. I don’t know where this came from. Only two possibilities: it was included with the Katzeye screen—unlikely I’m thinking—or it came with the camera. Anyone know which it would be? Thanks, -- Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net “...we are a form of invitation to others and to otherness..." - David Whyte -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018
I know how you feel. I struggle every year to select three that are good enough to submit. Except for the first year, the photo Mark selected was not the one I considered the best of my submissions. On 2/17/2018 13:32, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: As I understand the rules, at least one has to be included. Otherwise, I would never have made any of the annuals! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: Well, I've just uploaded 3 pics for the book. Let's see if any of them makes it :-). -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1
On 2/16/2018 20:35, Paul Sorenson wrote: Also no problems with 58.0.2 on Win 10. Maybe the problem lies with the search engine. Do you get the same response browsing to other sites? -p No, I never got that response browsing ANY site until I installed the "upgrade" to 58.0.2 and then I got that response with EVERY site. Unless you mean changing my home page to a different non-anonymizing search engine? I'm not going to do that. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox OOPS 58.0.2
That's a OOPS there. It's 58.0.2 that hosed my browser. I had 58.0.1 on my mind because I was trying to find a way to roll back to it. On 2/17/2018 03:15, Igor PDML-StR wrote: John wrote: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. Maybe you should upgrade to 58.0.2. Perhaps it fixes your internal conflicts... 58.0.2 on Windows is working fine here. Mark Roberts Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:09:04 -0800 wrote: Zos Xavius wrote: People still use firefox? ANyone who doesn't want to be sucked into Google's world dominating information sink. Those people can use Slimjet. I am using some 2-4 browsers for different purposes, depending on the device. Windows machines usually do not use Chrome. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018
As I understand the rules, at least one has to be included. Otherwise, I would never have made any of the annuals! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Well, I've just uploaded 3 pics for the book. > > Let's see if any of them makes it :-). > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018
Well, I've just uploaded 3 pics for the book. Let's see if any of them makes it :-). On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > AnnSan, Gonz - you're way too kind. In fact, let me check. Indeed, this > photo appears in the PDML Annual 2013. > > I may have re-processed it for posting to 500px. My processing style > appears to change quite a bit over time... > > Boris > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Gonz wrote: > >> Yup, not to detract from it but if only the girl's eyes were in sharp >> focus it would be perfect. The composition and subject matter are >> superb though, the rendering is awesome also. >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:16 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: >> > Gonz - I agree! and I May have told Boris that already :-) >> > >> > ann >> > >> > On 2/15/2018 11:30 AM, Gonz wrote: >> >> >> >> Damn, this one: >> >> >> >> https://500px.com/photo/239907245/tender-moment-by-boris- >> liberman?ctx_page=5&from=user&user_id=24564813 >> >> >> >> Has got HCB written all over it >> >> >> >> Amazing >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Boris Liberman >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> > PDML@pdml.net >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> > follow the directions. >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding >> it still. Dorothea Lange >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Boris > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1
updated the other day and so far so good, on the iMac Dave On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 8:36 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Well I'm having no problems at all with firefox...on WIndows 7 Pro. I use > chrome for random browsing and > facebook (words with friends seems to work better in Chrome) but for ebay > and all such business related stuff > it's Firefox and my email is Thunderbird so any links clicked on in email > (Peso's etc) come up in firefox browser. > > Not that anymore endorsements were needed here :-) > > ann > > > On 2/17/2018 3:39 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote: >>> >>> People still use firefox? >> >> I use Chrome for sites I login using my Google account. >> A single login saves time. And I use the Google Search Engine when >> I don't care about being watched. >> >> For the rest, I use other browsers (including Firefox) and >> search engines (Duck Duck Go most frequently). >> >> Bulent >> - >> http://patoloji.gen.tr >> http://celasun.wordpress.com/ >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ >> http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun >> >> >> 2018-02-17 5:26 GMT+03:00 Zos Xavius : >>> >>> People still use firefox? >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1
Well I'm having no problems at all with firefox...on WIndows 7 Pro. I use chrome for random browsing and facebook (words with friends seems to work better in Chrome) but for ebay and all such business related stuff it's Firefox and my email is Thunderbird so any links clicked on in email (Peso's etc) come up in firefox browser. Not that anymore endorsements were needed here :-) ann On 2/17/2018 3:39 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote: People still use firefox? I use Chrome for sites I login using my Google account. A single login saves time. And I use the Google Search Engine when I don't care about being watched. For the rest, I use other browsers (including Firefox) and search engines (Duck Duck Go most frequently). Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun 2018-02-17 5:26 GMT+03:00 Zos Xavius : People still use firefox? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018
AnnSan, Gonz - you're way too kind. In fact, let me check. Indeed, this photo appears in the PDML Annual 2013. I may have re-processed it for posting to 500px. My processing style appears to change quite a bit over time... Boris On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Gonz wrote: > Yup, not to detract from it but if only the girl's eyes were in sharp > focus it would be perfect. The composition and subject matter are > superb though, the rendering is awesome also. > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:16 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > Gonz - I agree! and I May have told Boris that already :-) > > > > ann > > > > On 2/15/2018 11:30 AM, Gonz wrote: > >> > >> Damn, this one: > >> > >> https://500px.com/photo/239907245/tender-moment-by- > boris-liberman?ctx_page=5&from=user&user_id=24564813 > >> > >> Has got HCB written all over it > >> > >> Amazing > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Boris Liberman > wrote: > >> > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > > -- > -- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding > it still. Dorothea Lange > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1
Nor here - 58.0.2 Alan C -Original Message- From: Igor PDML-StR Sent: 17 February, 2018 10:15 AM To: PDML@pdml.net Subject: Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1 John wrote: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. Maybe you should upgrade to 58.0.2. Perhaps it fixes your internal conflicts... 58.0.2 on Windows is working fine here. Mark Roberts Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:09:04 -0800 wrote: Zos Xavius wrote: People still use firefox? ANyone who doesn't want to be sucked into Google's world dominating information sink. Those people can use Slimjet. I am using some 2-4 browsers for different purposes, depending on the device. Windows machines usually do not use Chrome. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1
>People still use firefox? I use Chrome for sites I login using my Google account. A single login saves time. And I use the Google Search Engine when I don't care about being watched. For the rest, I use other browsers (including Firefox) and search engines (Duck Duck Go most frequently). Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun 2018-02-17 5:26 GMT+03:00 Zos Xavius : > People still use firefox? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1
John wrote: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. Maybe you should upgrade to 58.0.2. Perhaps it fixes your internal conflicts... 58.0.2 on Windows is working fine here. Mark Roberts Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:09:04 -0800 wrote: Zos Xavius wrote: People still use firefox? ANyone who doesn't want to be sucked into Google's world dominating information sink. Those people can use Slimjet. I am using some 2-4 browsers for different purposes, depending on the device. Windows machines usually do not use Chrome. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
