Re: I'm a little slow getting things processed

[Alan C]

An interesting set, Colin. I thought it was Winter over there?

Alan C

On 24-Jan-22 09:35 PM, coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:

Three from a resort in the Branson, MO, area with the 75mm and the rest from 
Pictured Rocks (MI) with the 165mm on a monopod while on a moving boat. (That 
was interesting.)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/albums/72177720296191633
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: I'm a little slow getting things processed

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Nice collection!  I especially like the3e ones of the cliff and natural
arch.

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 2:35 PM  wrote:

> Three from a resort in the Branson, MO, area with the 75mm and the rest
> from Pictured Rocks (MI) with the 165mm on a monopod while on a moving
> boat. (That was interesting.)
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/albums/72177720296191633
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Confusing Lightroom message

[Rick Womer]

Sometimes when I open a folder of photos in LR, a series of photos in the 
Library view has an icon with an exclamation point in the upper right corner.

Clicking on that icon produces the message:

 "The metadata for this photo has been changed by both Lightroom and another 
application. Should Lightroom import settings from disk or overwrite disk 
settings with those from the catalog?”

The highlighted selection is “Overwrite settings;” but how is one supposed to 
know which to select when there is no opportunity to preview the results?

Rick
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Some messages do not make it to mail-archive online archive

[ann sanfedele]

double thank you! ...

On 1/24/2022 6:48 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 24, 2022, at 3:17 PM, Doug Brewer  
wrote:

Regarding Mr. Sawyer and the bounces, yes, the cox address appears to be dead 
and his msn account was forwarding there. Since there has been no response from 
his end, I've disabled the msn account.

Thank you.
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com.   sent from ret4est




--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Some messages do not make it to mail-archive online archive

[Larry Colen]

> On Jan 24, 2022, at 3:17 PM, Doug Brewer  wrote:
> 
> 
> Regarding Mr. Sawyer and the bounces, yes, the cox address appears to be dead 
> and his msn account was forwarding there. Since there has been no response 
> from his end, I've disabled the msn account.

Thank you.
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com.   sent from ret4est




--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Some messages do not make it to mail-archive online archive

[Doug Brewer]

Y'all, I have little insight into how fast messages appear, or even if 
they appear, on the mail-archive servers. They are an archiving service, 
as you might guess, but other than that, it's basically just another 
subscriber. There could be any number of reasons for when or whether the 
messages get archived there.


Regarding Mr. Sawyer and the bounces, yes, the cox address appears to be 
dead and his msn account was forwarding there. Since there has been no 
response from his end, I've disabled the msn account.


Thanks,

Doug

On 1/19/22 5:32 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:


I've just discovered that some messages do not appear on the 
mail-archive online archive ( https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/ )


Usually, I use this archive to read some messages while lurking (which 
is often sporadic). Previously, I've seen some occasional messages not 
appearing there. But now, I see that, e.g. none of Mark C's messages 
show there.
I don't know how long this has been going for, and if I had missed 
someone's message addressed to me because of that. So, if I did - my 
sincere apologies!



I am not sure if Doug can do anything about that, as I don't know what's 
the culprit.



Cheers,

Igor

PS. I've just read a few of of Mark's recent messages.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

I'm a little slow getting things processed

[collinb]

Three from a resort in the Branson, MO, area with the 75mm and the rest from 
Pictured Rocks (MI) with the 165mm on a monopod while on a moving boat. (That 
was interesting.)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/101533246@N02/albums/72177720296191633
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

wdsawy...@cox.net

[Bill]

Hey listmeister, it's sadly obvious that Bill Sawyer is no longer paying
his access fee ar cox.net.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Lightroom Classic ransomware first impressions

[Paul Stenquist]

I’ve been using subscription photoshop for several years now and live it. I 
have the ten bucks a month on autopay and don’t really notice it. And rhe 
software is great. No problems, no upgrade worries. And it runs flawlessly in 
my 2015 4//cot, 4-gig I-7 32 gig iMac 27. I would nevertheless want to go back 
to software in a box.

Paul

> On Jan 24, 2022, at 3:17 AM, Larry Colen  wrote:
> 
> 
> A bunch of stuff has been happening in my life lately, not all bad, I found a 
> 2TB SSD which I had thought I had lost.  I ravaged a credit card, pretending 
> I had money and put it in a maxed out 2015 15” I purchased from a local shop. 
>   I now have a working, nominally reliable laptop.
> 
> It was already running Catalina, LR6 no longer ran on it.  Before I invest 
> time and energy I don’t have into learning a new editor I decided to at least 
> try out the ransomware Lightroom.  Amusingly their little logo is LRC.  
> 
> I’ve processed a couple of small sets lately.  Long story short it seems to 
> be working better and faster than LR6.  And as one might expect, everything 
> that their neglect caused to die in LR6 seems to be working.  
> 
> I haven’t tried reprocessing panoramas or HDRs, or looked for any new 
> features.  But after a couple days of the free trial it does seem to be 
> running noticeably smoother and faster on a 4 core laptop with 16G than on an 
> 8 core Classic Mac Pro with 64G.  
> 
> Using the CMP as a NAS seems to work OK.  
> 
> My next step is to have another go at shoehorning Catalina onto the CMP, I 
> already have open core on it.  
> 
> I really *hate* ransomware, I just don’t have the energy to fight it, or try 
> to find an alternative right now.  
> 
> But, as I said, it seems to be working slightly better than it had.  They did 
> add the “rescan faces” feature which is nice, much nicer than the way facial 
> recognition broke to the point of crashing everything when you tried to run 
> it.
> 
> 
> --
> Larry Colen
> l...@red4est.com.   sent from ret4est
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Lightroom Classic ransomware first impressions

[Bill]

The pay to play versions are good. I'm soending less on Adobe software
paying by the month than I did with the upgrades.

I am wondering why it's Adobe's fault when software that would run on Apple
stops working when Apple decides to break the ability for it to work?

Is it not on Apple to not break stuff when they decide to upgrade their
shit?

bill

On Mon., Jan. 24, 2022, 2:17 a.m. Larry Colen,  wrote:

>
> A bunch of stuff has been happening in my life lately, not all bad, I
> found a 2TB SSD which I had thought I had lost.  I ravaged a credit card,
> pretending I had money and put it in a maxed out 2015 15” I purchased from
> a local shop.   I now have a working, nominally reliable laptop.
>
> It was already running Catalina, LR6 no longer ran on it.  Before I invest
> time and energy I don’t have into learning a new editor I decided to at
> least try out the ransomware Lightroom.  Amusingly their little logo is
> LRC.
>
> I’ve processed a couple of small sets lately.  Long story short it seems
> to be working better and faster than LR6.  And as one might expect,
> everything that their neglect caused to die in LR6 seems to be working.
>
> I haven’t tried reprocessing panoramas or HDRs, or looked for any new
> features.  But after a couple days of the free trial it does seem to be
> running noticeably smoother and faster on a 4 core laptop with 16G than on
> an 8 core Classic Mac Pro with 64G.
>
> Using the CMP as a NAS seems to work OK.
>
> My next step is to have another go at shoehorning Catalina onto the CMP, I
> already have open core on it.
>
> I really *hate* ransomware, I just don’t have the energy to fight it, or
> try to find an alternative right now.
>
> But, as I said, it seems to be working slightly better than it had.  They
> did add the “rescan faces” feature which is nice, much nicer than the way
> facial recognition broke to the point of crashing everything when you tried
> to run it.
>
>
> --
> Larry Colen
> l...@red4est.com.   sent from ret4est
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Lightroom Classic ransomware first impressions

[Larry Colen]

A bunch of stuff has been happening in my life lately, not all bad, I found a 
2TB SSD which I had thought I had lost.  I ravaged a credit card, pretending I 
had money and put it in a maxed out 2015 15” I purchased from a local shop.   I 
now have a working, nominally reliable laptop.

It was already running Catalina, LR6 no longer ran on it.  Before I invest time 
and energy I don’t have into learning a new editor I decided to at least try 
out the ransomware Lightroom.  Amusingly their little logo is LRC.  

I’ve processed a couple of small sets lately.  Long story short it seems to be 
working better and faster than LR6.  And as one might expect, everything that 
their neglect caused to die in LR6 seems to be working.  

I haven’t tried reprocessing panoramas or HDRs, or looked for any new features. 
 But after a couple days of the free trial it does seem to be running 
noticeably smoother and faster on a 4 core laptop with 16G than on an 8 core 
Classic Mac Pro with 64G.  

Using the CMP as a NAS seems to work OK.  

My next step is to have another go at shoehorning Catalina onto the CMP, I 
already have open core on it.  

I really *hate* ransomware, I just don’t have the energy to fight it, or try to 
find an alternative right now.  

But, as I said, it seems to be working slightly better than it had.  They did 
add the “rescan faces” feature which is nice, much nicer than the way facial 
recognition broke to the point of crashing everything when you tried to run it.


--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com.   sent from ret4est




--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.