Re: Where are you located? (Lurkers also welcome to reply.)

2016-05-18 Thread Peter Loveday

Adelaide, SA, Australia here.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: FSF teaser

2016-03-14 Thread Peter Loveday

From: Larry Colen

Paul Stenquist wrote:

Does it cover full frame?


It is supposed to.  That is why I bought it.  I forget which page I looked 
on. But doing a quick google shows several positive results:


http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2009/10/compatibility-of-da-lenses-on-full.html


According to dpreview (FWIW) the DA* 55mm F1.4 works in full frame when 
stopped-down.  It doesn't say how much, but according to them "Ricoh has 
published a list of those lenses that will produce relatively useable 
results in full frame mode, if the aperture is stopped down.", so I suppose 
its official, though I couldn't find the ricoh source with a quick search.


http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentax-k-1

I'd be holding on to the FA50/1.4 myself, for now.  The DA55 is my favourite 
lens on APS/C, but if it winds up being an F2 or F2.8, then... meh.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Extremely disappointed: K-1 does not appear to work with ...

2016-02-23 Thread Peter Loveday

From: Mark C
The only issue with a wireless release is lack of a bulb setting. AFAIK, 
you need a cabled release for that. Too bad the K1 does not have T as well 
as B shutter mode.


Bulb mode with IR remote works fine for me on the K3, and as far as I recall 
worked fine with previous cameras too.


I do find setting CF7 (Bulb Mode) to be 'Mode2' (press-start / press-stop) 
rather than 'Mode1' (press-and-hold) to be somewhat more practical with the 
IR remote, but it does work in either.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New iMac 5K: M380 vs. M390 graphics

2015-11-25 Thread Peter Loveday
One advantage of the newer iMacs is that they can be used as displays 
when

they obsolete out.


This is no longer true, unfortunately.

"Note: iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014) and later iMac models
can't be used as Target Display Mode displays."
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204592



Probably for the same reasons Apple can't make a 5k retina monitor for use 
with MacBook Pros... Thunderbolt 2 doesn't have enough bandwidth to do it.


You'll need Thunderbolt 3 on both computer and monitor for it.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT - Elections and Politics and Guns and Religion

2015-10-21 Thread Peter Loveday

You guys and your elections, how inefficient.

We don't even bother with that stuff to change PMs these days :)

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: knarf

Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 2:01 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT - Elections and Politics and Guns and Religion

Okay, now that I got your attention, it's really a post about elections.

We in the Great White North just had one. It was the longest election 
campaign in our country's history: three months.


The news guys declared the winner about 6 minutes after the polls closed, 
and declared a majority government an hour after polls closed.


Living in Canada has its advantages.

Cheers,

frank
--

"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6172 / Virus Database: 4447/10853 - Release Date: 10/19/15 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Picked up a second-hand Pentax

2015-10-14 Thread Peter Loveday

Mark Roberts wrote:

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>I've often been tempted by the K-01 mated with an FA43 and DA21, it would 
>be an ideal little kit.


Yes, the 43 Ltd also works very nicely. My K-01 is the black/silver
one and the silver Limited lens looks very good on it. The focal
length is just a wee bit longer than I like for general shooting.

Mike Johnston has predicted that the K-01 will become a collector's
item and I think he may be right about that.


I picked up one of these new some years back, when they were at the end of 
their lifecycle and Pentax Australia (CR Kennedy) was clearing their last 
stock out.  I think it was A$250, including the 40mm DA XS pancake.  Not a 
great lens by any measure, but it was all so ridiculously cheap for that 
much camera, I didn't really even consider the lens to be costing anything. 
Hell, even the fact they use the same battery as the K-5 and on which I've 
used as yet-another-spare makes it even cheaper :)


Its real downside, as already mentioned, is its terrible buffer.  From 
memory, in raw it's only one frame?


I can't say I use it a whole lot, but I don't think I'll ever get rid of it 
either.  It's just too unique.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-3 users - how often do you use the AA simulator?

2015-02-05 Thread Peter Loveday

So - do you use it?


Nope.

Never except to test, as with you.  never had any problem, nor have I with 
the K-5IIs.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Mark C

Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 12:47 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: K-3 users - how often do you use the AA simulator?

When the K-3 came out once feature that contributed to the press
coverage was the Anti Alias filter simulator. So after more than a year
with the K-3 I can say that I only turned the AA simulator on once, to
see what it would do. On my camera, it does make a distinct sound during
exposures when enabled... Otherwise I have never used it, but I really
don't shoot many images where there is fabric or other things that might
kick off moire' patterns.

So - do you use it?

Mark

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
protection is active.

http://www.avast.com


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5645 / Virus Database: 4281/9064 - Release Date: 02/05/15 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO - RIP Phillip Hughes

2014-11-27 Thread Peter Loveday
Very sad indeed, I've enjoyed watching him play for SA the last few seasons. 
Not only a talented player, but a great leader at a young age. He will be 
missed on and off the field.


Nicely captured image, good to see it again.

Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday

-Original Message- 
From: Brian Walters

Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 7:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - RIP Phillip Hughes

The name wont mean a lot unless you're a cricket lover but, if you are
you'll be aware that a fine young cricketer was seriously injured when
hit on the back of the head during a match on Tuesday and died today
without regaining consciousness. It was a freak event with a tragic
outcome.

My wife and I were privileged to witness Phillip's maiden first-class
century at the Sydney Cricket Ground a few years ago. We are both
devastated by what has occurred.

I PESOed this image a few years ago so I hope you'll indulge me if I
do so again.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/66734.html

http://tinyurl.com/oq9ezwb

Further details here:

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/australian-cricketer-phillip-hughes-dead-at-25-20141127-11vd48.html

--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Has anyone been using the yongnuo 560-III and the TX controller?

2014-11-04 Thread Peter Loveday

Yep.  I have these.

They work as advertised really, well worth their ridiculously cheap price.

The 560TX isn't my favourite form-factor for on camera.  I tend to use a 
603ii on camera and a 560tx handheld to set power levels.


Anything specific you'd like to know?

- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 10:32 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss List
Subject: Has anyone been using the yongnuo 560-III and the TX controller?

I was poking around, and the 560-III always looked pretty good for the
price, and with the new wireless controller, they seem to be a really
nice setup, even for a lot more money than they charge.

--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8498 - Release Date: 11/02/14 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: FF daydreaming

2014-09-17 Thread Peter Loveday

On 9/17/2014 3:43 PM, JC OConnell wrote:

I was daydreaming today about the possible upcoming Pentax FF DSLR and
it got me thinking about the lensmount.
Since the FF body will initially be relying heavily on legacy, not
current lenses, would Pentax dare to uncripple the mount and bring
back the aperture cam sensor so that K and M lenses could meter and do
autoexposure?
That would be icing on the cake and make the camera irresistible for me.


Daydream on like Pentax's soul the aperture simulator is lost forever.


Not only that. I expect the mechanical aperture lever to go away
eventually and be replaced by all-electronic aperture stop-down.
Probably with some backwards compatibility at first.


Yes, indeed.

If anything we may see less compatibility with the (mythical?) FF line than 
we have with APS/C.  Ricoh may see this as an opportunity to modernize and 
make a clean(ish) break.


A good number of DA lenses will already be unusable (without some 
auto-crop), and it's really anyone's guess how well legacy K glass will 
perform.  Much of it has been less-than-stellar on APS/C, and FF would 
potentially be somewhat worse.


I'm not suggesting all lenses will instantly be incompatible, but I would be 
*very* surprised if they took the mount backwards and not forwards.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: FF daydreaming

2014-09-17 Thread Peter Loveday



On 9/17/2014 7:36 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:

On 9/17/2014 3:43 PM, JC OConnell wrote:

I was daydreaming today about the possible upcoming Pentax FF DSLR and
it got me thinking about the lensmount.
Since the FF body will initially be relying heavily on legacy, not
current lenses, would Pentax dare to uncripple the mount and bring
back the aperture cam sensor so that K and M lenses could meter and do
autoexposure?
That would be icing on the cake and make the camera irresistible for 
me.



Daydream on like Pentax's soul the aperture simulator is lost forever.


Not only that. I expect the mechanical aperture lever to go away
eventually and be replaced by all-electronic aperture stop-down.
Probably with some backwards compatibility at first.


Yes, indeed.

If anything we may see less compatibility with the (mythical?) FF line 
than we have with APS/C.  Ricoh may see this as an opportunity to 
modernize and make a clean(ish) break.


A good number of DA lenses will already be unusable (without some 
auto-crop), and it's really anyone's guess how well legacy K glass will 
perform.  Much of it has been less-than-stellar on APS/C, and FF would 
potentially be somewhat worse.


I'm not suggesting all lenses will instantly be incompatible, but I would 
be *very* surprised if they took the mount backwards and not forwards.


But really Ricoh can't afford to alienate the Pentax user base. if they 
build a Full Frame DSLR that doesn't at least have as much backward 
compatibility as the current APS-C cameras why would I or any of us for 
that matter, really care if they build one.  Because it says Pentax on the 
prism?  Please. Asahi Optical Company is dead and gone.  My loyalty to the 
Pentax brand lasts as long as they support my lenses.  Once they stop 
doing that, I might as well buy a Sony A7, if I want full frame.


Well, as I did say, I don't expect them to be incompatible right away.  What 
I think is more likely is progressive modernising of the mount, not 
progressively taking it back to old mechanical linkages.


Hypothetically we may see electronic stopdown capability, then new full 
frame lenses that require that.  Future bodies may or may not drop the 
mechanical coupling, but it is certainly possible we'll start seeing 
lens/body combos that just don't work together so well.  Much like when they 
introduced lenses with no aperture ring.


Anyway, it's all guesswork, but I agree they won't completely change mount 
unless they are crazy.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: FF daydreaming

2014-09-17 Thread Peter Loveday

A good number of DA lenses will already be unusable (without some
auto-crop), and it's really anyone's guess how well legacy K glass will
perform.  Much of it has been less-than-stellar on APS/C, and FF would
potentially be somewhat worse.



That depends. A 24-megapixel FF would have significantly lower pixel
pitch than a 24MP APS-C sensor – even a 36MP FF has slightly lower
pixel pitch – so both should theoretically be less lens-critical than
24MP APS-C.


That's true Mark, but I would also expect the increased angle of light 
caused by the FF circle to be a significant issue with lenses not designed 
for digital?


I may be wrong though.  I guess it's not difficult to see how that's worked 
out for Nikon FF with older lenses, it's unlikely to be significantly 
different.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Pentax Q-S1 Officially released

2014-08-04 Thread Peter Loveday

Looks to be a Q7 in the (much nicer) Q body, almost.

I'm sure there some other changes, but I'm not sure what.

I must admit, I love the original Q, but never really warmed to the 
subsequent ones.The Q-S1 looks pretty nice to me.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Brian Walters

Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 8:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Pentax Q-S1 Officially released

The rumours were true...

http://www.photographyblog.com/news/pentax_q_s1/

I'm not sure how it differs from the previous Q7.

Also officially released is the DA645 28-45mm F4.5 for the 645Z.


--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4716 / Virus Database: 3986/7977 - Release Date: 08/04/14 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: The local store had a K3 on display

2014-06-26 Thread Peter Loveday

*almost*

-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: The local store had a K3 on display

After playing with it for a few minutes, I can’t say anything about it’s 
performance, but it does seem like they did a good job on improving the 
button layout on the back. Several of the buttons that I’d hit by mistake 
seem to be moved to less obnoxious spots.  Just on that basis alone it would 
almost be worth getting a job just to be able to buy one.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4714 / Virus Database: 3986/7746 - Release Date: 06/26/14


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Adafruit display review

2014-06-18 Thread Peter Loveday
Yeah I got one of these some time back.  Kind of fun as a third monitor, but 
Windows 7 has no support for different DPI settings on different monitors, 
which makes it tricky to reconcile with the 27.  I'm not entirely keen to 
update the desktop to 8.1, which does do that. (though I use that on my 
laptop).


But for a dedicated image display, or whatever, it works quite well.

Larry, do you have any trouble with displayport losing connection, or 
interference lines across the monitor like a bad connection occasionally? 
I'm not sure that I don't have a fault in mine :-/


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 8:25 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List ; Larry Colen
Subject: Adafruit display review


1) It comes as a kit.  I suspect that this is an end run around Intel 
thunderbolt licensing and certification.


2) No instructions in the box.
product: https://www.adafruit.com/products/1652

Led to a tutorial:
https://learn.adafruit.com/qualia-high-res-displayport-desktop-monitor

Which didn’t say anything particularly useful, but had a very subtle link at 
the bottom titled Assembly that looks like it’s part of a clip from an apple 
page.  Which links to the actual instructions for assembly.


3) They use flat blade screws.  WTF?  Why not phillips like every civilized 
product?


They are 4-40 so I could replace them with real screws.
The ruler is to tell the different lengths of screws apart.

But, the 2-56 screws are phillips, not slotted.

——

Overall the assembly went fairly well.  The directions were pretty good. I 
should have read through all of the way before starting. They don’t mention 
needing both flat and phillips screwdrivers.  I think that they’ve 
substituted steel for nylon screws, which is a good thing.  It would be nice 
if there were an easy to print out version of the instructions.


I ran into a couple of issues with the monitor.  The first was entirely my 
fault in that I had USB 2 devices, like keyboard and mouse, plugged into the 
display, and when I unplugged my thunderbolt display, I lost mouse and 
keyboard, and couldn’t figure out why.


The other problem, which is something that I had forgotten about is that you 
cannot daisy chain the monitors, so my hopes of having three monitors at 
home have been dashed.  I’ve heard rumors of daisy chaining monitor, drive, 
monitor working to get multiple monitors, but I don’t have a thunderbolt 
drive to test with.


$

Overall the quality of the display is very nice.  It’s definitely smaller 
than I’d like for doing real work, but it should be enough to do the 
important work of copying files off my SD card onto a hard drive.


One nit of personal preference, is that I’d rather the display bezel were a 
matte finish rather than glossy.


If they ever make this with a 15” display it’d be damn near a must have.

We just did a quick test on a macbook pro as a second monitor, and it works 
just fine, though it’s damn small.  I suspect that if I were doing photo 
editing on a laptop, I’d want it for holding menus and such.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Adafruit display review

2014-06-18 Thread Peter Loveday


It’d be awesome if I could use it as an external display for my camera 
when doing studio work.


Would need an HDMI-DisplayPort for that, which is not so cheap sadly.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pilot error

2014-05-04 Thread Peter Loveday
Heh.  One of the many reasons I set my cameras to take all the bracketed 
shots with a single press these days...


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 9:29 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Pilot error

In today’s episode of pilot error theater…
Leaving the Kx in bracket exposure mode the last time I used it and 
wondering why the exposure is so irregularly wonky and every so often the 
shutter will stick open for so long.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4570 / Virus Database: 3931/7440 - Release Date: 05/04/14


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Keep the PEFs?

2014-03-24 Thread Peter Loveday

Not only skills, but software too.

Certainly Lightroom (/ACR) has seen some major improvements to its 
demosaicing and noise reduction over the years, and I'm sure other software 
likewise.


Even given the same settings and skill level, one can get a much better 
result re-processing a raw file now than 5 or 10 years ago.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Paul Stenquist

Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 6:27 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Keep the PEFs?

I figure my rendering skills are always improving, so I hang onto the RAWs. 
Just the other day I wanted to print a picture of my dog who had passed 
away. I went back to a 2004 shot I had produced with the *istD. I looked at 
the tiff and felt that it left something to be desired. Went back and did a 
new conversion. The result was a much nicer photo.


Paul
On Mar 24, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Kenneth Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:



Yep. At that point I consider the tiffs as my negative - I don't need to 
go back and convert the RAW again.


-Original Message-

From: Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
Subject: Re: Keep the PEFs?

On Mar 14, 2014, at 23:16 , Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:


1. Should I convert all the old PEF files to DNG?

If you're keeping the RAW files I'd say yes.
After a time period after RAW file conversion I generall delete the RAW 
files.




Wow!

To my mind, this is like: After a time period after making prints from 
my negatives, I generally throw away the negatives.  Really?


-Charles




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4354 / Virus Database: 3722/7241 - Release Date: 03/24/14 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: metz question

2014-03-18 Thread Peter Loveday
The new Vivitar Corporation sells brandy new 285HV flash units so they 
have new parts as well.
 Sadly the wiring is probably as cheep as possible, but then again I 
expect the same is true of the TT560 as both units are made in China, 
land of the Cut Corners.




I find both the yonguo and the MPEX dumb strobes quite intriguing.


285HVs just aren't that interesting any more, there are so many good options 
out there.


The YN560iii flashes would be better if yongnuo would get around to 
releasing the (now 6 months late) YN560TX.


But currently, I'm really liking my Godox V850s (which are nice and cheap) 
and AD360s (not so much).


It really is so nice to not have AAs in them anymore.  And of course, remote 
power control...


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT: Camera Bags

2014-03-06 Thread Peter Loveday

The ThinkTank Retrospective series are worth a look.

http://www.thinktankphoto.com/categories/shoulder-bags/retrospective.aspx

I quite like the look of the pinestone ones, That's what I generally use for 
a smaller kit.  (my poor Domke F2 doesn't really get much use nowadays...).


But camera bags tend to be very much a matter of personal taste, I find.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Bill

Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT: Camera Bags

I find myself in the market for a smallish camera bag. Said bag should
carry a Fuji X-T1 (this is about the same size as a Pentax MX) with a
lens mounted, and 3, perhaps 4 more lenses. The Fuji lenses aren't
gargantuan, but they are not all that petite, either.  The 14 and 35 are
along the size of the 77Ltd, the 23 is about the same as the 31Ltd, the
56 appears to be about the same size as the DA*55/1.4, with the 60 Macro
being slightly smaller.
I think I would like a more classic looking bag for this stuff.

Anyway, I am open to suggestions of brands and models.

thanks

bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4335 / Virus Database: 3722/7161 - Release Date: 03/06/14 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: zx/mz question

2014-02-07 Thread Peter Loveday
I still have my MZ-3, but haven't used it in years.  Sitting in a drawer 
alongside my other film bodies; LX, MX, SuperA, ME Super, et al.


The most recent I've had a film in would be my MX, a few years back.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: CollinB

Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 1:22 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: zx/mz question

A simple poll:
If you are shooting film, is anyone still using a ZX/MZ body? If so, which
model?
(I'm not seeing many of them around these days.)

Collin Brendemuehl


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3697/7069 - Release Date: 02/06/14 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Heads-up Ricoh

2013-12-12 Thread Peter Loveday

http://sam-haskins.tumblr.com/image/34125592632


Damn, look at that grain!

Pentax must've really used some terrible sensors back in the '60s.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: studio gear lust

2013-12-11 Thread Peter Loveday
Hmm looks pretty neat.  Indoor use only I'd think, wouldn't deal with wind 
so well.


It'd be nice if it would just go on a normal light stand (it may do, for all 
I know, but they don't seem to sell it without the stand).


If I could get one for a normal stand, I'd be tempted..

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: studio gear lust

There was a photo booth at the company party this afternoon, I saw this
background setup and was instantly filled with gear envy:
http://www.calumetphoto.com/product/calumet-on-site-portable-background-system/MP0500/

$250 for a stand and backdrop is out of my price range this week, but it
looks awesome.  The white backdrop also looks like it could be used as an
8x8 softbox.

--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6912 - Release Date: 12/11/13 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Camera Strap

2013-11-14 Thread Peter Loveday
I love my Luma Loop straps.  Unfortunately they don't make them any more 
(some patent dispute with black rapid I think).


I actually use my loop attached to one of the strap rings rather than the 
tripod screw/QR plate, I find it works better for me.  The quick release on 
the strap is very handy for those times I want to untether it from my 
shoulder (I also have a camdapter hand strap/QR plate on there for such 
occasions).


Luma have a new Cinch strap, but I've not tried it so can't really 
comment.  I seems to operate quite differently.


I always found the actual blackrapids somewhat bulkier, but others swear by 
them.


Either way, 'd never go back to a neckstrap now.. just seems so clunky and 
awkward.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Steve Cottrell

Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 5:50 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Camera Strap

Does anyone use any of the camera straps of the type that don't attach
to the normal camera strap mounts - rather they attach to a mechanism,
that screws into the tripod mount on the base plate, allowing the camera
to be carried upside down over the shoulder?

Any recommendations / pointers to manufacturers?

THANKS

--


Cheers,
 Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4158 / Virus Database: 3629/6834 - Release Date: 11/13/13 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: My K3.....

2013-10-30 Thread Peter Loveday
In Oz, the silver 'kit' was A$200 more, which is a bargain for the grip and 
a spare battery.


There's no kit available with the black version including grip though, so I 
can't really compare pricing there.


Still, I ordered the black one.  I have plenty of D-LI90s.. I'll probably 
pay more than $200 for the grip - but I just couldn't bring myself to buy 
the ugly silver monstrosity version :)


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: John Francis

Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: My K3.

On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:20:02PM -0600, Bill wrote:

On 30/10/2013 1:08 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Congrats on the K-3 and getting the limited for the same price as the
plain chocolate version, Bill!



Honestly, I thought about telling him to forget it, just get me a
black one, but it seems foolish to give up the thrown in battery and
grip because I don't like the silver cosmetics. I took a bath on my
silver Limited lenses because I wanted black ones once they became
available.

bill


It sounds to me as though one of you is getting a bit confused.

AFAIK the Silver K-3 kit (with the matching grip and an extra battery)
costs round about the same as the same package in black, not the same
as a black K-3 'body only'.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: wifi live view

2013-10-10 Thread Peter Loveday

That should be shit-tonne.


I thought it was Imperial shit-tonne, and a metric (technically an ISO)
shit-ton.  I believe ASA also uses shit-ton, but I could be mistaken.


Definitely Tonne in metric.

Of course it all depends..

If you have a metric 'ton' of shit, that's a shit-tonne.

But if you have an imperial ton of metric shit, that would be a shitte-ton.

Then for a metric 'ton' of metric shit, that would of course be one 
shitte-tonne.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Loveday
Yup :)

Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody else order one yet?  Bob S.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
 There is so much new and inviting to look forward to, but still,
relative AF speed and sensitivity performance are the center of my
curiosity at the moment.

 Jack


 - Original Message -
 From: eactiv...@aol.com eactiv...@aol.com
 To: pdml@pdml.net
 Cc:
 Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 8:07 AM
 Subject: Re: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs

 Thanks.

 That looks rather  impressive.

 Marnie aka Doe :-)

 In a message dated 10/7/2013  7:44:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
 bruce.wal...@gmail.com  writes:
 Pssst:


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2254722/PDML/K-3/PENTAX%20-%20K-3.html#!
 product-highlights

 In  case anyone missed it.


 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Darren Addy  pixelsmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
 AND now the page is a 404  error.
 : )



 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:16  AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Thanks for the  clarification, George. I agree with you; I would
 probably also want  the ability to turn that off but it will be
 interesting to see what  sort of images it produces.
 It is amazing to me what is possible  with the in-camera horsepower
of
 the PRIME  III.

 I will be very interested to see what the dynamic  range, etc. is
for
 this sensor/camera. If it is anywhere close to  the K-5/II/IIs it
is
 probably going to be the *best* APS-C DSLR on  the market (at least
for
 a week or two).
 :  )

 It is worth remembering that other camera  manufacturers also use
the
 Fujitsu Milbeaut image processor and so  will be seeing a
corresponding
 jump in *their* capabilities sooner,  rather than later.

 On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:06 AM,  George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com
wrote:
 that should say  more than one correction.  gs
 George  Sinos
 
  www.GeorgesPhotos.net
  www.GeorgeSinos.com


 On Mon, Oct  7, 2013 at 8:04 AM, George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 Hi Darren

  This is from the highlights page of the K-3  page.

 Multi-pattern white  balance

 When shooting scenes that  include multiple light sources, such
as
 sunlight and shade  or flash, light sources are recognized
 automatically and the  image is separated into different areas.
White
 balance is  adjusted separately in each area according to the
different
  light sources to achieve optimal color  reproduction.

 Sounds like it makes more  than correction in different parts of
the
 same  image.

 I agree, like most other  adjustments, it probably only applies
to
 jpgs.  But, it  sounds like something I would want to turn off or
on as
 a  creative tool.  I'm thinking of twilight or night shots where 
you
 may have several types of light in the same  image.

  gs

 George Sinos
  
  www.GeorgesPhotos.net
  www.GeorgeSinos.com


  On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Darren Addy
pixelsmi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I believe that means that you can save JPEGs from  the RAW image
in
 different white balance configurations  easily, in camera (which
is
 very cool). ALL of the  information is always there in the RAW
file.
 IF
 that is  correct, then I don't see any need to disable, because 
it
 won't happen automatically (saving you 9 different  JPEGs at
each
 preset white  balance).

 Also, the anti-alias  IS accomplished with microscopic sensor
 vibrations, so  I was wrong about that. I don't really
understand how
 it  can do that AND shake reduction, but we'll see how it is
  implemented. I suppose that most people are going to shoot with
it
 OFF
 and go for the resolution over the (rare) moire  problem (unless
you
 are shooting a lot of wedding  dresses or  something).



  On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 The multiple white balance corrections in a  single photo
sounds
 interesting from a technical  standpoint.  I hope that is
something
 that can  be disabled.  gs
 George  Sinos
  
  www.GeorgesPhotos.net
  www.GeorgeSinos.com


  On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Boris Liberman
bori...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 Yes, I see it now. Thanks,  Brian.

 On Mon,  Oct 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brian Walters
 apathy...@lyons-ryan.org  wrote:
 Quoting Boris Liberman  bori...@gmail.com:

  Oh, and BTW - no mention of PRIME  III...



  There is,  actually:

 
http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/dslr/K-3_#!product-highlights

  in the section headed Fastest continuous shooting at 
8.3FPS



  --
  Cheers

  Brian

  ++
 Brian  Walters
 Western Sydney  Australia
  http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/




  --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail  List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
 above  and
 follow the  directions.



  --
  Boris

  --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail  List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the 

Re: Does the s cause moire problems?

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Loveday
I wonder if the K-3 has an option to switch off tge anti aliasing filter 
simulator?



Ye! 3 options: Off/Low/High
Dario


Now, I want AA bracketing too :)

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs

2013-10-07 Thread Peter Loveday

Synchronization speed: 1/180 sec


oh FFS :-/  Still?!

Otherwise... looks awesome.


-Original Message- 
From: Darren Addy

Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 9:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs

http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/dslr/K-3_#!product-specs

--
Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3408 / Virus Database: 3222/6728 - Release Date: 10/06/13 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: it's time ...

2013-10-07 Thread Peter Loveday

The most whining I've seen is that there is no improvement in the
1/180th flash sync speed.

I find this a bit humorous, being an old fart, and wondering how we
ever got along in the 1/60th of a second film camera X-sync days.
There was a manufacturer that attained 1/125th with a vertical focal
plane shutter, if memory serves.


A manufacturer?  Pretty much every manufacturer did 1/125 vertical focal 
plane, and beyond.  Even Pentax managed 1/250 x-sync (PZ-1p).


I dunno, as a (the? :) whinger about this one... I guess I don't see it as 
any different to any other camera spec that has changed since the old days


ok, my first camera (ME Super) had 1/125, not 1/60.. but even then, we've 
moved on since those days.  One could say the same about any 'spec' really. 
How did we ever get on before AF? Before we had continuous shooting/motor 
drives?  before we could only fit 36 shots on a memory card? :)  - we all 
managed with what we had, but it doesn't mean improvements aren't 
worthwhile.


What annoys me, I guess, is that film cameras managed to get beyond 1/180. 
As I said even Pentax managed to get 1/250.  And that was with a full frame 
to cover... With less shutter travel, given the same shutter velocity, we 
should be able to do better than that.


Anyway, it's something I keep hoping for with each release, so it's a bit 
frustrating, especially with the rumoured new flash system.  Not to 
mention 1/180 being a relatively awkward speed... as a 2/3rd stop, it means 
flash meters can be annoying to work with it, or flash settings, etc.  I'd 
be happy enough with 1/250 just to make that easier.


Actually the other thing that would be nice (and *could* be done with 
firmware, but I won't hold my breath), would be to fire the flash even at 
xsync.  Nikons and Canons do this, and it's possible to do some clever 
tricks to get faster sync with pocket wizards and other triggers.


It may not be important to everyone, but some would find it useful.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: A camera for mom...?

2013-10-03 Thread Peter Loveday

Kids, Dogs, Beach... sounds messy :)

Might be worth looking into something water/shock proof so she doesn't have 
to worry about babying it too much?  Along the lines of the Pentax WG3, but 
there may be better out there.


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Christine Nielsen

Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:52 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: A camera for mom...?

So, here's a question... what kind of camera would you recommend for
your mother?  Your mother who isn't tech-savvy in any way.  Who wants
to take pics of the grandkids and the dog, on the beach, and at dance
recitals and soccer games

I'm thinking easy to use, not enormous or heavy, probably not dslr...
maybe with large buttons on it, so she can read them without her
glasses...?  :)  That's not an iPhone...

Is there anything out there in the super zoom/bridge camera range
that's worth considering?

Thanks,
-c

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


AF540FGZ-II

2013-10-02 Thread Peter Loveday

... just arrived.

In a Ricoh branded box, with Pentax above the model name.

The carry bag and flash itself still say ‘Pentax’ at least.

Now off to play...

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: New weatherproof flash units HD Limited lenses

2013-08-29 Thread Peter Loveday

This is why I want my flashes to be controlled vi wifi, and with
an app for my phone/tablet/computer where I can simply and easily
see and control everything from one place.


Agreed.  Having on-camera remote group control (as Canons can do, say), is a 
notch better than having to go to the flash to do it, but still not where I 
want it.  A handheld device would be ideal; and I'm hoping the yongnuo 560TX 
will be able to do that.  Will have to wait and see...


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Oh, Pentax

2013-08-28 Thread Peter Loveday



Well, I got the FA 50 f1.4 back and it seems to be working fine.
But can you believe it:  I'm still waiting for the DA* 50-135mm.  Pentax 
has had it
since the first week in July.  I called the other day, and they have the 
new motor,
but the accompanying circuit board is still on back order with Pentax 
Japan.  Ugh!


I asked if there was any chance to get it back by Sept. 18th (field trip 
that day), and no promises
were given.  Bummer.  Just can't figure out why these parts would be so 
hard to ship.


Do you have any idea how much time it takes to harvest all the baby unicorn 
tears required to make one of those?   A very long time, that's how much.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New weatherproof flash units HD Limited lenses

2013-08-28 Thread Peter Loveday

I just got myself a Metz 58 AF-2, it seems up to the task and is very
much more affordable here than the Pentax 540.



I'm happy, though not ecstatic with my Metz.  A few things are more
awkward than they should be, like adjusting power in manual mode.


I've been fairly happy with my (slightly older) 58AF-1, except it has just 
developed an issue with the motor zoom last week :-/  so I'm back to using 
the 540 for now.


However I do agree the settings are a little tedious.  The 54MZ series were 
a bit nicer in that respect.



I'm seriously looking at one of those midwest photo lumopros as a
manual backup to the Metz.  If I'm using multiple strobes I'm not
going to be shooting in TTL mode anyways.


For the price, I'm pretty happy with my Yongnuo YN560-iii flashes at like 
$70 each.  There were numerous QC issues with the original YN560, but they 
seem to have pretty much sorted this out.  Or maybe I've just been lucky.


Anyway, not only do they have built in RF receivers, but Yongnuo have 
recently announced they'll be releasing a trigger that allows group control 
with remote manual power setting on them.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Stupid Metz question

2013-07-14 Thread Peter Loveday

You select Servo from the Remote menu. (Sel-Remote-Servo)

But perhaps you need to update your firmware first, if you haven't?

See 
http://www.metz.de/en/flash-units/firmware-download-flash-units/mecablitz-58-af-2-digital/pentax.html


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 6:30 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Stupid Metz question

I did try to RTFM, and the answer wasn't obvious, probably because I was
not looking for the right word in the index.

How do I set up my new Metz 58 as an optically triggered dumb strobe?


--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Enablement du jour

2013-06-04 Thread Peter Loveday

You will probably have the best luck, right off the bat,
using all of the strobes in manual mode. This means you
cannot trigger off the pop-up flash because Pentax can't
understand why anyone would want to make any flash exposure
decisions for themselves, or even worse, remotely trigger
any flash that wasn't made with Pentax to use their wireless
sync protocol.


Hmm, doesn't the pop-up flash fire a single flash suitable as a trigger when 
in M mode?


I must admit I've not recently tried this, maybe never with the K5.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: K5 focus screen - user changable?

2013-05-29 Thread Peter Loveday
K5 focus screen - user changable? Does the K5 have user changable focus 
screens?


Sure does.  I put a katz-eye in mine.  It’s pretty straight forward, though 
you might need to use different shims to adjust the focus properly 
(available as spares from Pentax).


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: IT'S HERE! Fifth PDML Photo Annual!

2013-05-08 Thread Peter Loveday

ROCKSTARS worked for me too.

Thanks!

- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Stan Halpin

Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 11:43 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: IT'S HERE! Fifth PDML Photo Annual!

Thanks Larry - that covered my cost of shipping.

stan

On May 8, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Larry Colen wrote:


I was able to get 15% off with ROCKSTARS


On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:14:25PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:

mike wilson wrote:

Sorry, this promotion cannot be be applied to books you did not 
author.


And with all the other codes I find, there is _always_ a reason they
cannot be used.


Here's a list: http://couponfollow.com/site/blurb.com

--
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com  http://red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2241 / Virus Database: 3162/5809 - Release Date: 05/08/13 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT For the cyclists here

2013-05-06 Thread Peter Loveday

Discussions around sex, religion, politics and the controversy
surrounding bicycle helmets are usually shunned but I thought that
this article may be of interest:

http://sydney.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=11488


I wonder if there is a similar correlation between having sustained a 
'severe head injury', and being a Pentax user.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Nice Pentax watches

2013-04-18 Thread Peter Loveday


Bong Manayon wrote:

Most camera makers have 'branded' items of sorts such as water bottle,
towels and apparel (Canon has an umbrella, Pentax does not...).


It's just more proof that Pentax is not a real competitor anymore.  If I 
can't get an umbrella for my camera system, then why would I want to stick 
with them?  All the big guys do umbrellas, come on Pentax, what are you 
thinking! :)


But yeah, agreed, the watch is a 'cute' addition for marketing; I'm sure 
they'll give them away to various resellers (if they still have any...) or 
high profile users (ditto) as incentives.  And they'll probably sell ok in 
Japan.  All companies of any size do this kind of stuff, I'm not sure it's a 
sky-falling example really.  If anything it's positive that they are doing 
*any* brand-recognition/marketing activities.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

2013-04-17 Thread Peter Loveday

Or using a Pentax Endoscope.  Just don't post behind-the-scenes shots.

-Original Message- 
From: Bong Manayon

Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 1:34 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Enablement and a question on list rules

So long you're wearing a Pentax watch... :)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM,  eactiv...@aol.com wrote:

The PUG has always allowed shots that use  JUST a Pentax lens, not
necessarily a Pentax camera. (I just double checked  that, yup.) The 
annual I am not

sure about. (I looked on Mark's page and  didn't/couldn't find any break
down in specifications like that.)

HTH,  Marnie aka Doe :-)  But, you know, maybe one of these days they'll
lighten  up the rules to people who once USED a Pentax. Heh.

In a message dated  4/17/2013 8:36:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bori...@gmail.com  writes:
Hi!

After quite a wait (which was totally worth it), another  Ricoh GXR-M
mount module arrived here yesterday. This time it was  accompanied by
Novoflex K-mount adapter. This is most wondrous thing as it  works
seamlessly regardless of whether the lens has an aperture ring or  not.

Focusing it with A 50/1.2 fully open is not any more difficult than  any
other lens. In fact it is quite easy. So now, I have a Ricoh camera and
all my Pentax lenses (notably 50/1.2, 43 and 77) that can be used on  it.

Is it then appropriate to:
1. Post photographs taken with this  gear to PUG?
2. Submit such photographs to PDML annual?

What would  elders say?

Boris


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail  List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to  UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the  directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.




--
Bong Manayon
http://bong.manayon.net

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2241 / Virus Database: 3162/5751 - Release Date: 04/17/13 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Enablement

2013-04-09 Thread Peter Loveday
I've had the 58AF-1 for quite a few years (which is very similar), and have 
never had a problem with it.  Been 100% reliable.


Interface isn't great (the 54MZ metz flashes I have are much better), but 
it's usable.


Yes, it stays on manual mode.  540FGZ is so frustrating for off camera work. 
It wouldn't bother me if it switched to PTTL when on camera; but doing it on 
power on even when not connected is ridiculous.


USB is handy, Firmware updates have kept it working with newer Pentax 
cameras.


All in all I'll reach for this ahead of my 540FGZ.  Been very happy with all 
my Metz flashes.


One thing to be aware of... full power has something like a 1/120 flash 
duration, so you won't see full GN at 1/180 sync.


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 4:33 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Enablement

My metz 58 af-2 arrived in the mail today.

I haven't had a chance to do any real photography with it yet, but my 
first impressions are:


It's a bit smaller than the AF540 in just about every dimension.

It has several features that the Pentax doesn't:

The second flash on the front
A stroboscopic mode (can set power, number of flashes and frequency)
flash bracketing
USB update for firmware
Manual power control in 1/3 stop intervals to 1/256 power

I am not entirely thrilled with the user interface. I don't have specific 
suggestions for how to make it better,

but it isn't really trivial, or intuitive,  to adjust anything on it.

It was a bit of a pain finding an English only, PDF of the manual for the 
pentax version to download to my tablet.


It will be interesting to see whether it stays in manual mode when set there 
(unlike the pentax), or how long it will work between needing to be sent in 
for repair.



--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2240 / Virus Database: 2641/5732 - Release Date: 04/08/13 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pentax Has New Firmware

2013-02-07 Thread Peter Loveday



Doesn't everyone here shoot Nikon or Sony FF now?


Hang on.. I thought we were all moving to Instagram?  Have I missed the 
boat, again?


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I don't understand

2013-02-01 Thread Peter Loveday

The FA lenses also tell the body to what distance they are focused.
 Perhaps his lenses are at infinity?


I had considered that too, but I'm not sure it follows.

I could see the camera opening up the aperture based on focus distance 
relative to guide number, with a flash.  But to adjust shutter speed?


Unless you're shooting slow-sync, then surely it assumes all light comes 
from the Flash; and so shutter speed (up to x-sync) is irrelevant?


Nonetheless, I blame the sigma flash :)

- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Rick Womer

Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:01 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: I don't understand

The FA lenses also tell the body to what distance they are focused.  Perhaps 
his lenses are at infinity?


Rick

http://photo.net/photos/RickW


- Original Message -
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: I don't understand


- Original Message - From: Collin Brendemuehl Subject: I don't 
understand




When I put either the FA28/2.8or the FA50/1.4 and use either the
internal or a shoe-mount flash, the shutter speed goes to 1/25.
But when I use an A lens it goes to the desired 1/180.
Why?


The FA lens supplies more information to the camera and allows dynamic 
shutter speed adjustment when using flash. A series and earlier don't supply 
such niceties, and so the feature is disabled.
I suspect Pentax could enable it if they desired, the A lens does transmit 
aperture, which is all that should be required, but they want to sell new 
lenses, and so disable some features.


William Robb


-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2238 / Virus Database: 2639/5572 - Release Date: 01/31/13


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Lightroom vs Sigma 18-250 question

2012-12-01 Thread Peter Loveday

The LCP files do indeed contain the ID, at least for the Pentax lenses.

It is absent from some (all?) Sigma ones.  I recall there are some 
conflicting IDs with third party lenses, presumably due to Sigma's 
unwillingness to actually licence anything?


Anyway,  If you look in, say, the Pentax DA 55 LCP file, you'll see:

stCamera:LensID8 226/stCamera:LensID

So I guess one could put the same (but I suppose 8 8) in the appropriate 
sigma file.  Seems like you need to put it in every entry in the correction 
table.


I have no idea if this will make it use this ID to identify the lens, mind 
you.


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Bruce Walker

Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2012 6:57 AM
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Subject: Lightroom vs Sigma 18-250 question

Posting for a K-5 -toting friend (Gerrit Visser) who just got
Lightroom for Windows.

Gerrit asks ...

The puzzle is why the Sigma 18-250 shows as Unknown lens in
Library/metadata while it is listed ok in Develop. The lens id is 8 8
which is in the exif, exiftools displays the correct lens etc.

Has anyone figured out where LR/Camera Raw keeps it mapping tables?
The .lcp files do not contain any information regarding the lens id,
only corrections. As an added twist, the release notes have the word
Macro in the Sigma lens name, while it appears nowhere else.

--
-bmw

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2629/5427 - Release Date: 11/29/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Lost, K10D

2012-10-23 Thread Peter Loveday

Probably a bit early yet for photos to be out there, but:

http://www.stolencamerafinder.com/home?searchType=auto

Need to give it a photo with EXIF.  Or a serial # manually.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: knarftheria...@gmail.com

Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:50 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Lost, K10D

Ok, not really lost, rather, stupidly left on a bench.

It happened a week and a half ago. I was working at the time, had taken my 
camera strap off my neck and put the camera next to me while I sat in a 
shopping mall checking something in my wallet. Then my Android beeped, 
telling me I got a call to pick up.


As I got off the subway about fifteen minutes later that sinking feeling hit 
me; no camera around my neck.


I immediately got a second call to do, so unfortunately it was almost two 
hours after I left my camera before I got back to the mall. Checked with 
security and all the stores near the bench (who would have brought the 
camera to security - mall policy); nothing turned in.


Checked the local lost and found ads, placed lost and found ads myself, 
continued to monitor ads and security.


Nothing.

Gone.

Ok, I know the person who found it and walked away with it did nothing 
illegal, but you'll never convince me that keeping that camera was morally 
right. The ~right~ thing to do would have been to turn it in to security.


They might as well have stolen it from me.

I guess what bothers me most is that they won't get much for it if they pawn 
it or sell it. It's worth far more to me than it's market value.


Even worse, what likely happened is that the finder sold it at a bar for $20 
for a few beers.


Oh well.

About 30 lost images, maybe a few good ones but no prize winners. The 
18-55mm was on it and while I'll miss it, at least it's not a valuable lens.


And I still have my venerable *IstD.

It was a terrific camera and took wonderful images. I'll miss it.

cheers,
frank

If the world were clear, art would not exist. -- Albert Camus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5349 - Release Date: 10/23/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Lost, K10D

2012-10-23 Thread Peter Loveday

Hmm actually, seems it only gives 1 result free.  Maybe useless then.

Might be other options around though, probably worth a bit of a search.

- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Peter Loveday

Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:11 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lost, K10D

Probably a bit early yet for photos to be out there, but:

http://www.stolencamerafinder.com/home?searchType=auto

Need to give it a photo with EXIF.  Or a serial # manually.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: knarftheria...@gmail.com

Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:50 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Lost, K10D

Ok, not really lost, rather, stupidly left on a bench.

It happened a week and a half ago. I was working at the time, had taken my
camera strap off my neck and put the camera next to me while I sat in a
shopping mall checking something in my wallet. Then my Android beeped,
telling me I got a call to pick up.

As I got off the subway about fifteen minutes later that sinking feeling hit
me; no camera around my neck.

I immediately got a second call to do, so unfortunately it was almost two
hours after I left my camera before I got back to the mall. Checked with
security and all the stores near the bench (who would have brought the
camera to security - mall policy); nothing turned in.

Checked the local lost and found ads, placed lost and found ads myself,
continued to monitor ads and security.

Nothing.

Gone.

Ok, I know the person who found it and walked away with it did nothing
illegal, but you'll never convince me that keeping that camera was morally
right. The ~right~ thing to do would have been to turn it in to security.

They might as well have stolen it from me.

I guess what bothers me most is that they won't get much for it if they pawn
it or sell it. It's worth far more to me than it's market value.

Even worse, what likely happened is that the finder sold it at a bar for $20
for a few beers.

Oh well.

About 30 lost images, maybe a few good ones but no prize winners. The
18-55mm was on it and while I'll miss it, at least it's not a valuable lens.

And I still have my venerable *IstD.

It was a terrific camera and took wonderful images. I'll miss it.

cheers,
frank

If the world were clear, art would not exist. -- Albert Camus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5349 - Release Date: 10/23/12


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5349 - Release Date: 10/23/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Jury verdict is for Apple (vs Samsung)

2012-08-27 Thread Peter Loveday
It does though depend a lot on what one considers prior art.  There are 
examples of touch UI using pinch-zoom well before the iphone.  This 
Microsoft/NYU-Research demo is a year prior to the iPhone being shown: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKh1Rv0PlOQ, and that's just one example.


Now Apple's patent is admittedly specific to a portable device, and 
perhaps that makes a legal difference, I dunno.


Still, borrowing your bluebird analogy, that seems akin to Kodak (as Apple 
this time) saying to MS/NYU, We've invented this great new bluebird photo. 
It looks just the same as yours, but ours is specific to having been shot on 
APS on a much smaller body.  So it's a new invention, and took us years to 
think of.


Anyway, the legalities will be debated for years I'm sure, but I don't 
really buy most of the Invention arguments on either side of the fence here.


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Stan Halpin

Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:43 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: Jury verdict is for Apple (vs Samsung)

Rounded corners I think are a relatively  trivial issue, though I must admit 
that I am surprised to see how many non-Apple phones look so much like 
Apple. You would think that other companies designers could do something 
other than copy. The part I most strongly react to is the patent(s) relating 
to the tap, pinch, etc. aspects of the interface. And Apple's statement that 
it took them three years to develop, and then it took Samsung 3 months to 
copy that work. I worked on interface design back when we were struggling 
with early GUIs, issues like natural-feeling ways to expand windows, pop-up 
vs. pull-down menus, etc. Interface design is a non-trivial process, and 
Apple deserves a great deal of respect for their continued ability to find 
good solutions. Good enough that others want to copy what they have done. I 
can hear the argument but those are the only gestures that could be used on 
a touch-screen interface, why should Apple profit from such an obvious 
trivial detail? The answer is that what they've done didn't exist before. 
Why shouldn't they have the benefit of their labors?
I wouldn't want an Apple-dominated world anymore than an MS-dominated world. 
But I do like to see the little guy (Apple) do well and profit from it. And 
I will cheer on the next set of good ideas as well. Even if, however 
unlikely it is, that they come from MS or Samsung.


stan

On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Tom C wrote:


From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info

Tom, do you remember the iconic bluebird photo 10-15 years ago? It showed 
up in calendars, posters, postcards, etc. I remember an
interview with the photographer - he earned enough from that one shot to 
build a home in the woods, full studio and darkroom, etc. What if
Kodak early on had said that shot has great moneymaking potential; we'll 
copy it and use our superior marketing (and lower pricing) to
compete with you for sales of that image. And oh by the way, if you don't 
like it, then our film division won't sell you any more film.


I think that is a close analogy to what you are suggesting that Samsung 
should do. Yes, copyright and patent rights are not identical, but
the principle is the same; theft of intellectual property is not a good 
thing.


stan



Hi Stan,

I'm all for intellectual property rights. Apple and Xerox Parc have
some potential issues as well then. I'm sure some will differ, and I'm
not trying to start a debate by any means, as I'm truly no authority
on the subject.

I'll readily admit my statements are made upon the white-washed
summarizations of the legal proceedings and not the gory legal or
technical details.

From what I've read some of Apple's issues are with shapes,radius of
rounded corners and look of icons. My general opinion is you can
patent an implementation of an idea, or particular code behind a
technology, but not an idea. Again, I'm not a lawyer and don't have
intimate knowledge. If Samsung actually stole intellectual property
then I agree they should pay. If they said 'hey that's a good idea;
let's do something like that' and then made their own block-buster
product, that's the free market.

I may recall the bluebird photo you're referring to (or it's my
imagination). In any case Kodak or anyone else with a camera was
certainly able to go out and take as many bluebird photos as they
wanted to and compete with the guy and that would have been fair and
legal, as long as they weren't using the bluebird image he took. I
don't think Kodak theoretically refusing to sell film is the same
issue as what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting Samsung could recoup the
penalty at some future time.

What I'm against is a world where we only have Fords, Apple iPads,
Apple smart phones, Samsung TV's, Frigidaire refrigerators,,, you get
my drift, to choose from, and from what I can see that's the kind of
world Apple would like it to be.

Tom C.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Semi-OT: Put yourself in my shoes for a moment . . .

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Loveday
Are there any friendly local PDML'ers you could hit up for a loan of a lens 
for the trip?


I'd offer, but i think going via Australia is probably a bit more of a 
detour than you'd want to take...


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Walt Gilbert

Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:26 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Semi-OT: Put yourself in my shoes for a moment . . .

. . . and give me your thoughts.

Say you're going to be leaving for the Black Hills of South Dakota in a
little over a month and have an extremely limited budget. I'm quite
literally saving up the quarters from my tips (along with everything
else that I can) to finance it. But, you want to make sure that you get
some images worthy of the trip.

I'll be taking all of my camera bodies with me -- K-x, K20D, K100D Super
-- and plan to use my Promaster 70-300 as a zoom, at least one of my
50mm primes, and I'd like to have something wider for landscapes. I have
a Takumar 28/2.8, but it's really a pretty crappy lens compared to the
others.

What would be the best, most affordable option -- best bang for the
lowest buck -- for the wider landscapes? All I really care about is the
focal length and IQ -- everything else is mere window dressing as far as
I'm concerned. I'm essentially looking for something very common and
highly regarded.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

-- Walt

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5210 - Release Date: 08/19/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Replacement for Pentax K-5

2012-08-15 Thread Peter Loveday

I dunno, I find the size/weight of the K-5 ok.  All relative I suppose.

I'm pretty much entirely happy with the K-5 in almost all regards.  I 
suppose it shows how DSLRs are reaching maturity that so many of us are 
actually happy with the product.  Not so long ago being happy with a Pentax 
product on this list might have been considered heresy :)


About the only thing that would encourage me to upgrade would be better 
flash sync speeds, like 1/500th maybe. I can dream anyway :)


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: John Francis

Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 4:30 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Replacement for Pentax K-5

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:02:41PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:


In any event, this is all a spectator sport for me. I'm very pleased
with the K-5 and it will be a long time (if ever) before I exceed its
capabilities. In fact, the next purchase I'm currently considering is
a Q.


The next purchase I'm considering is whatever replaces the OM-D.
I doubt if I'll need anything more than the K-5 offers, and I've
got most of the lenses I want.  But I'd like something lighter.
The EPL-1 doesn't replace the K-5, but it supplements it nicely.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5201 - Release Date: 08/14/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Do sRGB and adobe RGB make any difference in raw files?

2012-07-12 Thread Peter Loveday
If the color space for RAW is determined by the sensor  associated 
hardware/software,

what does setting the color space on the camera do?


It probably affects the in-camera translation to jpeg.


That is correct.


Indeed.

However... theoretically,  there have been sporadic reports that the white 
balance setting actually affects gain adjustments to channels pre-ADC on 
various camera models, including some Pentax ones (amongst others).


If this is indeed true, then this implies that the white balance setting can 
affect can cause changes to raw captured data.  I imagine Auto WB would not 
do this, only specific settings, but I'm not really sure what was found to 
be the case.


Anyway, not something I've ever really bothered about personally, but the 
implication is that on certain camera models, in certain WB settings and 
shooting situations, you may be able to get better captured RAW results with 
specific WB settings.  But without anything concrete, it's more or less 
guesswork.


Bottom line: shoot RAW, ignore WB, take photos :)

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Lightroom and RAW vs DNG files

2012-07-08 Thread Peter Loveday

On the K-7  K-20 I believe you could choose either PEF or DNG as
the raw format.  I never owned those cameras, so I'm not 100% sure.


Yep.  As you can on the K-5.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: The difference between a tourist taking photos and an artistmaking images

2012-06-13 Thread Peter Loveday

From: Bruce Walker
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com 
wrote:


 On 12 June 2012 23:19, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
  http://themetapicture.com/art-degrees/
  Dan Matyola
  http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
 



 I'm inclined to agree with that observation.

I am as well, to a degree.


I dunno, it's a pretty obtuse observation.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: RIP Tommy

2012-06-13 Thread Peter Loveday

Brilliant photo.

I know others have said that it shows how he is drinking himself to death, 
but to me.. well, I don't see that.  Maybe the second one you posted makes 
that point more so (for me).


Anyway, this, aside from the beautiful rendering, shows a character - 
larrikin, one of the boys, yob, whatever you want to call it.


I feel a sense of carefree, happy go lucky, freedom to the image.  And I 
guess that's where drinking takes us.


In any case, beautiful photo, of an interesting subject - for me, not so 
much sad, but representative of someone who's where he wants to be.


YMMV.

- Peter


Once again, I captured the last image ever someone I knew -- in this 
case, a guy named Tommy Pool. He used to frequent the club where I  tend 
bar, but a little over a year ago, he applied for a  re-enrollment and he 
was declined by the membership due to his  inability to control his 
drinking.


Well, that didn't stop him from drinking himself to death, which he  a 
couple of weeks ago. I'd dropped by his place with a friend a few  weeks 
prior and he was in his usual condition. I happened to be  carrying my 
camera that night and decided to pop off a few shots.  This was the last 
one of the bunch:


http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/7181169897/
K-x, A50/1.7, f/2.2, ISO 3200, 1/125

Comments are, as always, welcome.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Problems with K-5 and extension tubes

2012-05-16 Thread Peter Loveday

Just tried this, and I'm seeing the same thing too, with an A28/2.8

I'm guessing the camera refuses to stop down at all if it thinks there is no 
lens present.  The vivitar extension tubes are black on the mount (well, 
mine are anyway) and I'm guessing non-conductive?


The alfoil trick on the contacts does seem to make it work as intended.  I'm 
now tempted to sand the paint off that part of the mount on my tubes.


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: John Francis

Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:13 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Problems with K-5 and extension tubes


I've run into a problem trying to use my (Vivitar) auto extension
tubes with my K-5.

Scenarion:  Camera set to M, lens (A 50/f1.4) set to f/22.

With the lens directly mounted to the camera, everything works as
expected: DOF preview stops the lens down to f/22, and the exposure
check showshow far I am off from correct exposure.  Taking theshoot
results in an image correctly exposed at f/22.

If I put one of the extension tubes in place, though, the lens
stays wide open at all times, and the image is captured at f/1.4
[no other changes to the settings on either lthe lens or the body]

This is not what I expect (or want). Any clue as to what is wrong?

Fortunately I have a work-around; using the Fotodiox K-mount-to-m43
adapter (and the same lens  extension tubes) on the Olympus E-PL1.

Here's what I was trying to photograph:

 http://www.jfwaf.com/temp/pfsmini1.jpg

That's a small metal figure a friend of ours painted for my wife to
use when we participate in tabletop role-playing games (Pathfinder).
For a size reference, the large knurled circular plinth at the very
bottom of the shot is a metal K-mount body cap.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5001 - Release Date: 05/15/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Calibrating light meters and digital cameras

2012-05-15 Thread Peter Loveday
I have an L-308s, I hadn't actually seen that they had new digital 
versions out.


As far as I can see, it's more or less just the added ability to calibrate 
that's different?  I don't get the impression it meters any differently to 
suit digital at all, more that you can calibrate it to match your 
(presumably incorrect ISO rated) digital sensor?


I've never really had any problems using mine with my DSLRs, so I'm not 
really that convinced I need to upgrade.


- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Bob W

Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:47 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Calibrating light meters and digital cameras


From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen

[...]


People seem to have taken my question as a challenge to their adulthood
or something.  I seriously don't see what  light meter will get you
that a little creative work with the camera and histogram won't.



Meanwhile, nobody's answering my actual question.

Bienvenue a l'internet.

B


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2171 / Virus Database: 2425/4999 - Release Date: 05/14/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pentaxes in the classroom, and reliability

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Loveday

His problems are kind of a shame, because I think that a big part of the
reason that the K1000 was such an iconic student camera was its 
robustness.


Yeah, we had a stable of K1000s and some Ricoh K mount equivalent (no idea 
what model now) in our school;  While there always seemed to be a few off 
for repair, I recall the photography teacher once saying Notice how it's 
always the Ricohs that break down.


Ironically, I suppose your friend could say exactly the same thing these 
days...


- Peter



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pentax cameras really really really really...

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Loveday

Yes, I think you might be right.

For some reason, I had thought it was in all of them, but obviously I just 
remember it from the *istD.



Guess I mostly avoid this issue, as I always make a habit of leaving the SD 
hatch (and battery hatch, if applicable) open when I've removed the 
card/battery, so I remember to put them back in before I take the camera out 
with me.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: John Francis

Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 5:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax cameras really really really really...

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:45:01PM +1000, Brian Walters wrote:


Both my *ist DS and K200D will fire the shutter with no card in the
camera and I can't see any custom function on either camera to
change this.  If you can point me to the appropriate custom
function, I'd be in your debt!


The *ist-D had a setting that would prevent shutter tripping without a
card in the camera, but that may well have been the only Pentax DSLR to
have this function.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4953 - Release Date: 04/22/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pentax cameras really really really really...

2012-04-22 Thread Peter Loveday

Which camera?  There is usually a setting to stop that.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Tim Bray

Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 12:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Pentax cameras really really really really...

... really really really really really really really really really
really really really really really really really really really really
really really really really really really really really really really
really really really really really really really really really really
really really really really really ...
... shouldn’t let you take a picture with a cheerful click of the
shutter when you don’t have a memory card installed.

That is all. -T

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4953 - Release Date: 04/22/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Another Pentax Oddity

2012-04-14 Thread Peter Loveday

It very likely that this is a fake. None of the features make sense,
especially the film type reminder on the back that looks like
it came off a 60's german rangefinder.


Yes, Looks a lot like the one on the top of my Retinette (II I think?), to 
me.


And what a ridiculous place to put it; doesn't look likely.

- Peter




On 14/04/2012, at 5:29 PM, Brian Walters wrote:

This seems to be a special version of the ME.  It's not listed on Boz's 
site as far as I can tell.



http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem_trksid=p4340.l2557hash=item256f32e2f8item=160779395832nma=truept=Film_Camerasrt=ncsi=Lx42P3wE8S4cGT2KnGj42OA3hYU%253Dsspagename=RSS%3AB%3ASHOP%3AAU%3A101orig_cvip=truert=nc

or

http://alturl.com/xsgon



--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PDML Photo Annual update

2012-03-25 Thread Peter Loveday

Tim Bray wrote:

Do like a game designer and ship it when it’s ready to ship.  And the
community thanks you.


So long as it doesn't turn out like a 3D Realms/Triptych Games/Gearbox 
Software/Piranha Games release (Duke Nukem Forever), we'll all be happy :)


- Peter



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: monitor calibration upgrade

2012-03-21 Thread Peter Loveday

FYI, as I understand it, Spyder2 can still be used with Lion; but you need
to use the Spyder3Express software (which is a free download):

http://spyder.datacolor.com/support-osx-lion.php

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Paul Stenquist

Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:56 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: monitor calibration upgrade

The Spyder 2 has a new home.

On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:


I finally had to purchase office 2011 for Mac. Too many problems with
comments, hyperlinks and other peripheral items with an older version that
relied on a conversion utility to read dock files. Since it's my
livelihood, I decided not to experiment with open office or other
alternatives. So that opened the way for an upgrade to opsys 10.7, Lion.
Good enough. Except that obsoleted my trusty Spider 2 Express calibration
tool, which has kept my monitors palette right in sync with my printers
for years. Seems it only works on Macs with 10.6 and earlier.

Since I had so much good luck with that product, i purchased Spier Pro 4
from BH for $169. It nailed the color palette, and since it also sets
luminance, I didn't have to do the fiddly workaround to set the brightness
that I previously employed. What's more, it will calibrate a second
monitor, so my Apple Cinema Display 21 now matches the iMac 27. Not
absolutely necessary, since I use it mainly for tools and function windows
with PhotoShop, but a nice convenience. I'm pleased.

That brings us back to the Spider 2 Express. As I said, it does a good job
on color calibration, at least it did on all my Macs. I think it works on
all PCs, but not sure about that. It's free to anyone in the U.S. who
wants to pay postage. Hate to discriminate against those in other places,
but you probably don't want to fool around with potential custom problems
and postage that almost exceeds the worth of the item.

Paul


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4885 - Release Date: 03/21/12 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What to see in southeastern Australia? (Melbourne/Sydney)

2012-02-22 Thread Peter Loveday

Coopers all the way :)

But then, I'm South Australian, so somewhat biased :)  There are various 
good microbreweries around, of course.


I would suggest various SA wine destinations, but as you're not really 
coming this way...


But if you are into wine, there are a number of areas between Melbourne and 
Sydney, depending on the route you're taking, say around Griffith or Mudgee 
area, amongst others.  I've not visited them myself.


Of course Hunter Valley isn't prohibitively far up from Sydney, if you 
wanted to do that.


Hmm, do we have any Victorian PDMLers?  I can't actually think of any...

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: David Savage

Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:32 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: What to see in southeastern Australia? (Melbourne/Sydney)

I'm a big fan of James Squire  Little Creatures beers.

LC is here in Freo. The do an awesome lentil curry  the pizzas are
spectacular.

On 23/02/2012, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:32 PM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:

P.S.: I hear Australia is a better place for beer  wine than liquor,
so I may have to pass on the gin. ;)


Not sure how big craft brewing is in Australia, but the native beers I
sampled were similar enough to the popular brews in the U.S. from the
big breweries.  I've heard that they are a bit territorial about beers
(literally, by province). VB (Victoria Bitter) for Victoria, for
example. The first 33 on this list are Australian. Perhaps you can see
how many you can hunt down while there: http://bit.ly/wyQDBr
or
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vq=cache:U_XwtB5PB-MJ:www.jacksonsongeorge.com.au/pdf/BHF%2520Beer%2520List.pdf+hl=engl=uspid=blsrcid=ADGEESjyrMuBSj8dIoJl9JVElE0DiOYW5rt4kHLPzDWUx4arDIbNIJB6HF5mSJiLFE94fTLv-ITL3O_bWEbzEClLiEMbiehZiQcQLwVXcZpwSNKyKhp44nZitRhD4MQhisrC4gTDh_NBsig=AHIEtbRDdVW-1Of2MWReDOCHrmNpM4JJ1gpli=1

If you want a laugh, Google Hahn's Premium commercials and watch the
videos. Enjoyed a pitcher with our (fantastic) meal at a tiny
Melbourne pub.

Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I think the K-01 looks cool

2012-02-10 Thread Peter Loveday

If I could get a Hello Kitty one, I'd have pre-ordered by now :)

-Original Message- 
From: Walt Gilbert

Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 3:03 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: I think the K-01 looks cool

On 2/10/2012 7:35 PM, Tim Bray wrote:

Even in yellow. There, I said it.  -T


I agree. Yellow isn't my preference, but I wouldn't move into a clock
tower if I were to have one forced on me.

-- Walt

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Flash for K5/K20D Metz or Pentax or ?...

2012-01-27 Thread Peter Loveday
Amongst others, I have both an AF540 and a Metz 58AF-1 (the -2 is much the 
same, but with a metal shoe and perhaps other minor changes).


They both do a good job, but for flexibility the Metz is hard to beat. 
Usable manual modes on any camera setting, intelligent auto mode, better 
manual power level range (down to 1/256 vs 1/64), and it's a bit smaller.


The 540 might just have the edge in terms of power, but my choice between 
the two would be the Metz for sure.


I think the Metz is probably also a bit cheaper?

Let me know if you have any specific questions between the two.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Robert and Leigh Woerner

Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 4:58 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Flash for K5/K20D Metz or Pentax or ?...

I am going to buy a new flash soon. I currently have the AF360 and want  to
upgrade. Any thoughts/opinions/real experience with the Pentax AF540  vs a 
Metz

58 AF2? I am also open to other recommendations. I am mainly concerned ref
reported build quality issues of the Pentax unit and hot shoe sticking 
problems.



Thanks in advance,

Robert

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: size comparison

2012-01-02 Thread Peter Loveday
Yeah those little NG bags aren't bad, I was tempted but decided on a 
thinktank restrospective 5 (http://goo.gl/X9dKS) for casual stuff nowadays. 
*Just* tall enough for the 60-250 if I want to take it.   I prefer it for 
working out of over my urban disguise 40, and it sure beats carting the 
Domke F2 everywhere.  I often take the camera+55/1.4 loose anyway, and find 
that the retrospective 5 gives me plenty of space to work out of.


I dunno if I'd call the Sigma 30/1.4 a small lens, though :)

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Tim Bray

Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 6:40 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: size comparison

I have a nice little National Geographic bag (http://goo.gl/j0gTG)
(but with the branding removed).  It enforces a useful discipline.  I
can take the 50-135 and *one* small lens.  Or the DFA-100 and two
small lenses.  Or 3 small lenses, which is all I have (21mm/40mm
limited, Sigma f1.4 30mm).  Moving from K20 to K-5 made everything a
little less strained. -T

On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
In another forum, there was a discussion about what kit people take on 
spontaneous photo walks. Several people mentioned how their primary camera 
(Nikon D2x and the like)  was too big and heavy got me thinking about how 
my K-5 with the DA40 compares with what was my only SLR for decades, an 
SRT-101 with a 58/1.4. Note that both set ups have about the same FOV. For 
fun I threw a couple of primes on a K-1000 and an FE2.


Digital cameras aren't really all that much bigger than their film 
counterparts after all:

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/7215…

My bathroom scale only has resolution of 100g/.2 lb, but on it, both 
cameras came in at 1.8 pounds, so it hasn't gotten significantly heavier 
either. When you compare the size and weight of half a dozen SD cards, 
that'll each hold a few hundred frames, with a few rolls of film, all of a 
sudden digital becomes very appealing.


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


WTB: Luma Loop / LoopIt v2

2012-01-02 Thread Peter Loveday
I don't suppose anyone has a Luma Loop or LoopIt strap they want to part 
with do they?


They're no longer available new, and I'd like to get a second one...

Thanks,
- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I blame Savage

2011-12-14 Thread Peter Loveday



Who's to say it isn't? Larry's showing us his bosons interacting with
oddly-flavoured quarks.


The uncertainty of the spin is a bit strange.


What's strange is that this is the first time any body has told me that 
my quarks are oddly flavoured.


I'm wondering how Bob knows what your quarks taste like...

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I blame Savage

2011-12-13 Thread Peter Loveday

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6503305225/


For some reason, given the subject, I was expecting this to be a photo down 
your pants.  Once bitten, twice shy, I guess :)


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I blame Savage

2011-12-13 Thread Peter Loveday

On 12/13/2011 4:02 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6503305225/


For some reason, given the subject, I was expecting this to be a photo
down your pants. Once bitten, twice shy, I guess :)


I am fairly confident that I have never posted a photo down my pants 
to this august forum.


Likely true.   Mr Savage, on the other hand... :)

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PDMLers on Facebook - do me a favor?

2011-12-12 Thread Peter Loveday

And some crap too :)

Aside from Mark's, which obviously benefits from the omnipotent combined 
wisdom of the PDML's votes, the number of votes for images seems inverse to 
its quality.  You sure we're not supposed to be voting for the pictures we 
least want to win? :)


The current leader that I could find, with 60 votes, is a guy skiing in 
trees (Ski Owls Head), which illustrates this perfectly.


Ah well, that's public opinion for you.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Paul Stenquist

Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:17 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PDMLers on Facebook - do me a favor?

Done.
Some nice pics here, but yours is certainly a winner.

On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:


Could you throw a vote my way in the AMC Photo Contest?
My shot is the BW Spring Melt at Pinkham Notch, which I showed as a
PESO a couple of weeks ago.

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150424877981681.354590.43527081680type=3
(3rd from right in 28th row down)

--
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Sanyo XX Battery Powered by eneloop, 2500mAh - Best of, bothworlds or a gimmick?

2011-12-07 Thread Peter Loveday

Well, just going by the math ...

The 1500mAh Eneloops give 1500 charges X 360 flashes per charge = 540,000 
flashes
The 2500mAh Eneloops give 500 charges X 460 flashes per charge = 230,000 
flashes


2 x 230,000 = 460,000

So it looks like the new high power ones have less than half the usable 
life of the old ones.


Price-wise, they cost 67% more than the regular eneloops ($24.99 vs 
$14.99), but only give about 43% of the value.


Regular Eneloops are 2000mAh.

But yeah, unless you really need it (ie don't want to have to change 
batteries in the middle of a wedding...), then I'd stick with the regular 
ones.


Plus, you can get them in pretty glitter colours :)

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: It just gets worse for Olympus

2011-11-09 Thread Peter Loveday

Someone will want their medical division for sure.


Hoya will probably corner the market on endoscopes.


You're expecting their medical division to go ass-up, then?

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO -- The Waitress

2011-10-29 Thread Peter Loveday

Nice.

Makes me think of... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g12f7uDIGZc

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: P. J. Alling

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 1:56 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- The Waitress

I went to a dinner meeting the other night as the semi official
photographer, (I still had to pay damn it).  I took informal portraits
of all the attendees, and a few of our waitress, who was much more
interesting looking, no one else is officially interested in the photo
of the waitress.

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20thewaitress.html

Equipment:  Pentax *ist-Ds w/smc Pentax M 40mm f2.8.

As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.

--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid 
a lengthily search.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: This is riduculous

2011-09-26 Thread Peter Loveday
You have to set the appropriate custom function (37: Using Aperture Ring) to 
allow it.  See p294 of the manual.


-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: This is riduculous

On 9/26/2011 10:03 PM, Tom C wrote:

I'm trying to use my 43/1.9 in Bulb mode, in a non-A aperture setting.
Shutter will not fire. Now I want to use my Zenitar fish-eye. Shutter
will not fire.

I've probably experienced this before but WTH IS IT SO HARD for this
stinking K-7 to work with a lens in MF, manual aperture mode or with a
MF lens? It should be OBVIOUS how to do this, or I'm an idiot.

I want to just smash this thing with a baseball bat and change brands.


Did you tell the K-7 to work with manual aperture lenses?

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (from dos4est)


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Shopping for an O-GPS1

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Loveday

A) Has anyone on the list been recently shopping for one?  Any
strong recommendations on places to check out, or to avoid?


Bought mine here in Oz, so I can't help you there.  But some observations:



B) Has anyone that has one run into critical problems that made them
 decide that it wasn't really worth the money after all?


The GPS works well; though don't expect it to work that well indoors.  It 
will work in my house (not that I use it here, for security), though it can 
take quite a long time to get a lock - if I wander in from outside it 
maintains it ok though.  Recently in some galvanised iron shed type 
buildings, I couldn't get a lock.  Nonetheless, pretty happy with the GPS 
side of it.


The astrotracer function is interesting, and works well within its 
limitations.  But some (silly, to me) decisions with the software 
implementation limit it a little.


Specifically:

* No ability to do any sort of multi-exposure for layering.  Most 
astrophotographers will take multiple short exposures rather than one long 
one, for noise and dynamic range benefits.  You can do a nice 3min exposure, 
but you can't do over the same astro-track, say, 60 x 1sec exposures, each 
with DFS (or not).


* There is also no way to get it to do multiple traced frames in sequence; 
note this is different to the previous point where I wanted to do multi 
exposure in one trace, this is to do a time-lapse of lots of astrotraced 
shots to put together in a video.  The astro trace function only works in 
its own custom menu, so there's no way to use the intervalometer with it. 
Right, I thought, I can use an external interval remote with it on 
bulb/astrotrace - but that doesn't work either, because for an astrotrace 
shot, you don't push the shutter release, you press OK.


Like I said, silly little implementation decisions that severely (for me) 
limit the flexibility of the function; which is frustrating considering the 
function *does* work well otherwise.


- Peter



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Shopping for an O-GPS1

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Loveday

Some other notes:

* Even though it's hotshoe mounted, it doesn't prevent all flash usage.  The 
PC sync socket still works fine, and in conjunction with an appropriate 
hotshoe cable set, I can use my 540FGZ (off-camera) in PTTL just fine. 
Using the GPS off camera likely would work too, but that could present 
issues with the compass direction, unless you kept it lined up nicely.  Note 
Pentax say you can't (shouldn't?) use this with a flash - so use at your own 
risk.


* The calibration is slightly awkward, particularly if you have a big lens 
on.  Makes me feel like I'm gonna drop it... :-/


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Shopping for an O-GPS1

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Loveday

DFS?


Sorry, Dark-Frame Subtraction.


The lack of multiple exposures seems annoying.
Could it have something to do with the movement limitations of the sensor?


I certainly wouldn't expect it to be able to exceed the total duration (ie 
movement limits) over all the shots.  But within the, say, 3min window 
there's really no reason it couldn't take several exposures with the sensor 
tracking over the whole sequence.


I did a quick bit of shopping around and ran into another annoying 
limitation.

They don't seem to be currently available.


They do seem to have released in an unusual region order with this one; 
usually these things are available in the US somewhat before 
Europe/Australia would see them.


PentaxWebstore.com still lists them as on pre-order too.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Shopping for an O-GPS1

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Loveday

* The calibration is slightly awkward, particularly if you have a big
lens on. Makes me feel like I'm gonna drop it... :-/

The guy I was shooting with today was quite amused, watching me juggle my 
camera to get the thing calibrated. You don't need to do the physical 
calibration for GPS tagging at least, you just need to do it for 
astrotracing, if I am not mistaken.


The astro-tracing has a more accurate calibration (forget what they call it 
offhand) - AFAIK in both cases, the calibration is all to do with the 
direction stuff (compass, perhaps accelerometers).


Obviously the astrotracer relies heavily on this being accurate;  but also 
just the direction tagged in the image uses it.  I'm not sure how off the 
mark the compass heading is without it.


The actual GPS position (not direction),  is unaffected AFAIK.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Enablement

2011-08-22 Thread Peter Loveday

Got my O-GPS1.

Seems to work as advertised so far, now looking forward to trying out the 
AstroTracer.


Anyone else playing with one of these?

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Cameras running on Android

2011-08-11 Thread Peter Loveday

I'd love to have a wifi interface for my camera, so I could control it
from my phone, including some semblance of live view on the display.


I have recently been considering doing a tethered shooting app for Android; 
specifically for my Nook Colour (running CyanogenMod 7) - though it'd work 
on any phone/tablet with USB *Host* support.  Wouldn't give you wifi control 
(though it may be possible I guess with two phones/tablets...), but it 
could, in theory, give tethered shooting/viewfinder via USB.


Does anyone else think this would be useful, or would it be largely a waste 
of time?


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax????????

2011-07-01 Thread Peter Loveday

The sky isn't falling.


This is the PDML.  The sky is _always_ falling.

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Is Ricoh Going to Buy Pentax????????

2011-07-01 Thread Peter Loveday

Does this mean the K-r  K-5 would look like this...?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/5163816994/


Heh :)

I'm assuming all new lenses are going to get stuck on the AF drive too...

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

2011-06-30 Thread Peter Loveday

Done and done.

-Original Message- 
From: Tanya Love

Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:27 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: TOTALLY OT, but proud mummy needs your help!!

So hey everyone!  I know I haven't been around of late much, been crazy
busy, will fill you all in soon, however...

I just realised that I haven't posted this to the list and I am such a bad
mummy for not doing so! Some of you have seen this on Facebook, but, here
goes: My daughter is in the top 10 in the Australian Search for the next
Milky Bar Kid!!

You may remember Molly-Rose as I photograph her so much and she is all over
my portfolio with her ginormous eyes!

Anyways, she has beaten over 1600 entrants Nationwide, to get where she is
and if she wins, will receive $10k and also record the new Milky Bar TVC in
New Zealand next month.

So,Final shameless Mummy Plug (I promise)! I just realised that today is
the big day! Voting for the Milky Bar Kid closes at midnight tonight! If you
haven't already, please vote for our beautiful Molly-Rose Mayer-Love, she is
driving us nutts! If she doesn't win, I think I might go on holiday to the
Himalayas for a week whilst she grieves! lol.

The link to the site to vote is here: www.milkybar.com.au and she is the
second last picture on the page.

Thanks guys, hopefully we will have some great news to announce come Monday
when we find out who the winner is!

Tan.x.


Tanya Love
AIPP Accredited Professional Photographer

www.lovebytes.com.au
www.facebook.com/LoveBytesPhoto
www.loveandsoul.com.au
m: 0458 006 740



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Android Camera Apps Suggestions

2011-05-09 Thread Peter Loveday

Huh, where did you get this - there's an Android version actually released?

-Original Message- 
From: John Sessoms

Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 5:59 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Android Camera Apps Suggestions

The Photographer's Ephemeris

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Nook color as a photo viewer

2011-04-13 Thread Peter Loveday
I installed CyanogenMod 7 on my Nook Colour.  Turns it into a fully 
functional Android (Gingerbread) tablet.


Then you can choose what picture viewer/reader/etc you want to use...

- Peter


-Original Message- 
From: Larry Colen

Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:21 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Nook color as a photo viewer


On Apr 13, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Larry Colen wrote:

Zab returned from her three month sojourn in Sleepy Hollow. While she was 
there she bought a nook color for her aging mom to use, as it is getting 
difficult for her to read regular print. In the process of using it for a 
few days so she could show her mom how to use it, she became so fond of 
it, she decided to keep it for herself and bought a second one for her 
mom. Now that she's home with it, I'll let her have it back in a couple of 
days.


Seriously though, it reminds me a lot of my early experiences with my iMac 
in that the things it does well, it does so well, that it makes its 
annoyances so much more infuriating, especially since most of the 
limitations are just there as limitations to keep you from using it for 
anything that BN doesn't want you to.


Photos on it look very good. Unfortunately, the gallery program is an 
unrepentant piece of crap.  It shows all photos in one flat file, rather 
than letting you sort out photos by category. If I do use it to show off 
my photos, I'll have to start publishing them as pdfs or something.


I just bought and downloaded the pdml annual, and tried looking at it on the 
nook.
First of all, I can't rotate the book sideways in it to format it better on 
the screen, on top of that, I can't adjust the size of the photos.



--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: A sensor question

2011-04-11 Thread Peter Loveday

Ah sorry for adding to the confusion then, I misunderstood.

Interestingly, older sensors quite often used CYM sensor sites rather than 
RGB.  There was a shift toward primary colour sensor arrays however, 
generally because they were considered to give more accurate representations 
of colours.


It is an interesting question, however.  There are certainly some cases 
where I'd trade off colour accuracy for high ISO capability; though with 
cameras like the K5 this is becoming less of a requirement.


In an ideal world, I'd like to be able to change the bayer array 
electronically, even remove it for BW.  But I can't see that happening.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Sandy Harris

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 2:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A sensor question

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org wrote:


That's not like any XYZ colour space transform I've ever seen?


I've never heard of an XYZ colour space transform. I just used XYZ
as names for what the sensor elements might be sensitive to in a
different sensor design.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: A sensor question

2011-04-10 Thread Peter Loveday

That's not like any XYZ colour space transform I've ever seen?

It depends on the chromaticities of the source/target RGB space, but say for 
sRGB to XYZ, one would use the matrix transform:


[ 0.4124564  0.3575761  0.1804375 ]
[ 0.2126729  0.7151522  0.0721750 ]
[ 0.0193339  0.1191920  0.9503041 ]

And the reverse, XYZ-sRGB:

[ 3.2404542 -1.5371385 -0.4985314 ]
[ -0.9692660  1.8760108  0.0415560 ]
[ 0.0556434 -0.2040259  1.0572252 ]

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Sandy Harris

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: A sensor question

The usual sensor uses basically three types of element -- R, G and B
-- in a particular layout.
Why not X Y Z where X = R+G, Y = R+G+B, Z = G+B ?

You can get RGB from XYZ easily enough:

 Y-X = R+G+B - R+G = B
 Y-Z = R+G+B - B+G = R

 X+Z-Y = R+G + B+G - R+G+B = R

But the total light you are accepting is 2+2+3 = 7 rather than
1+1+1=3, so you are getting more photons overall. Isn't that
beneficial?

Y also gives you a straightforward monochrome.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pentax Lens Roadmap?

2011-02-25 Thread Peter Loveday
On the plus side, the lack of a roadmap gives us the opportunity for even 
more boundless wild speculation. :)


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Thibouille

Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 7:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax Lens Roadmap?

No roadmap and I do not expect one.
They got burned pretty badly with theirs (60-250 anyone?) and as a
small company they probably do not want to shout to everybody their
next move.

We'll have to to without.

2011/2/24 Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com:
Anyone seen a recent lens roadmap? Awhile back it seems I saw something 
about a pending DA* 400mm.(?)


Thanks!

Jack





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.






--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ
 KX, MX, SuperA+Motor, Z1, P30
 Mamiya C330+80/2.8
 Sekonic L-208
 FalconEyes TE300D x2 Studio flashes

Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody SnowLeo/Win7

Programing: Delphi 2009

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Question about Metz 45CL4 (analog one, not the recent digitalversion) and SCA adapters

2011-02-11 Thread Peter Loveday
Without TTL support, I'm not really sure that it'll give you anything over 
using a stock SCA-301 even, on a 45 series?  I don't have one of these, but 
I have a flock of 60CTs, and really there's little to be gained by any form 
of dedicated SCA with these on non-TTL capable cameras.


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Newbie with DSLR and soon to be an owner of a K-R when itarrives...

2011-02-10 Thread Peter Loveday
I also would like to ask When is Spring and when will it finally get 
here?


PDML doesn't do spring :-)  Welcome!  Cheers, Christine 


Indeed.  We're more a perpetual 'winter of our discontent' type crowd :)

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pentax Mirrorless: This is interesting

2011-02-04 Thread Peter Loveday
'interesting' might be one word for it.  'Not in the least bit' would be 
another five.


At least, not to me. Now if it were APS-C...

- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Now that the K-7 can do SDXC...

2011-01-14 Thread Peter Loveday

Can anyone think of a scenario where a 64-gigabyte card sounds like
something you'd want/need?

That's almost 3,000 shots on one card in RAW mode, even.   Wow!


Video!


I wonder if they've removed the 4GB limit on video in this situation, given 
that SDXC (well, exFAT) doesn't have the limit.  I'm guessing not, as that 
would be useful :-/


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Now that the K-7 can do SDXC...

2011-01-14 Thread Peter Loveday
Thermal certainly comes into it, and that's likely going to be a killer 
anyway.  But the fixed time limit is due to the 4GB file size, and is why 
the length varies based on resolution/quality.  At full quality, full 1080p, 
it can only do about 5 mins before it hits 4GB.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Bong Manayon

Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 11:11 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Now that the K-7 can do SDXC...

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Peter Loveday pe...@loveday.org wrote:


I wonder if they've removed the 4GB limit on video in this situation, 
given

that SDXC (well, exFAT) doesn't have the limit.  I'm guessing not, as that
would be useful :-/



Is it a file size limitation?  I thought it was a time limit; or thermal...

Bong

--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO: Candle

2011-01-02 Thread Peter Loveday


Kai thought these glowing things were fascinating at our local Christmas 
Carol service:


http://picasaweb.google.com/loveboy/PESOs?authkey=Gv1sRgCJCsjeWRqsKHlwE#5557565728449298194

And no, he didn’t touch it :)

Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT Ya know you're old when you remember...

2010-12-30 Thread Peter Loveday

From: David J Brooks

I quit that job to work on the ice, 1096-1971, at $1.35 and hour,
which was adult minimum wage back then.


Damn, that's a long time to stick at a job.  Do you remember Hastings at 
all, or was that just before your time? :)


- Peter


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: OT Ya know you're old when you remember...

2010-12-29 Thread Peter Loveday

Hmm, dunno about most of that, must be US stuff :)

However I just checked and my K1000 is still metal and glass :)

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Elizabeth Masoner

Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT Ya know you're old when you remember...

Ok, the age question thread made me start thinking how different each
generation's experiences are.  Mine are kind of a mismash because my parents
were much older before they started their family and almost all of my
cousins were old enough to be my parents.  Thought it might be fun to do
some comparing of stuff we remember.

The Aldridge Family radio program
The Shadow radio program
It being safe to eat anything you got on Halloween (homemade/unwrapped/etc)
Riding the go-kart down the main street in town and not getting in trouble
with the police
All grown ups having the authority to call you down if you acted up in
public
Walking home from school to eat lunch
The first big CB craze (my dad bought us handheld CBs to use as walkie
talkies - wow did we hear some stuff)
Challenger Explosion
Ronald Reagan getting shot
When the K1000 was metal and glass (my first SLR)
Lawn darts that had points

~Liz
http://lizmasoner.wordpress.com/
http://thornsnclaws.wordpress.com/
http://photography.about.com





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: COMPLETELY OT! Roll Call...

2010-12-28 Thread Peter Loveday
Hmm, I would've been 28 I guess when I first subscribed to PDML, back when 
it was a real Pentax list.


Now I'm 40.

- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Tanya Love

Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 1:12 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: COMPLETELY OT! Roll Call...

So, it occurred to me after all these years on the list, that I may actually
not be the baby of the list anymore!  How sad is that?!  I am getting old!

So, just out of interest, was wondering if you guys would all like to post
your ages so we can get a bit of a demographic round up of sorts.

Sadly, I just turned 34.  I was only 23 when I sent my initial email to the
list back in 2000!! I had only 2 young babies at the time, now with 5 it
seems so long ago!

So scary to think that I can no longer be considered a junior member of
the PDML!

I might actually have to start offering some advice/knowledge around here
rather than asking for it all the time!

Tan.x.

Tanya Love
Photographer

www.lovebytes.com.au
www.facebook.com/LoveBytesPhoto
www.loveandsoul.com.au
m: 0458 006 740




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: COMPLETELY OT! Roll Call...

2010-12-28 Thread Peter Loveday
With the average age of PDMLers so far, we're already a valuable 
archaeological treasure.


- Peter

-Original Message- 
From: Subash

Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:46 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: COMPLETELY OT! Roll Call...

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:42:32 +1000
Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:


So, just out of interest, was wondering if you guys would all like to
post your ages so we can get a bit of a demographic round up of sorts.


as it happens, turned 48 yesterday

Mark, is there a way yet of marking an entire thread? i have a feeling
this thread may turn out to be of immense archaeological value to
posterity...

--
regards, subash

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


  1   2   3   4   5   >