Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

The little Sirui head that came with my T-025x is actually quite good for its 
price, fine for light to medium weight equipment given the capabilities of the 
tripod. Not for big DSLR and long lenses, however, but I’ve used it with my 
Fuji GS645S Wide 60 and Leica CL using a 75mm M lens with no issues. The Sirui 
is excellent for the Light L16 and iPhone 8 Plus using Moment 18 or 58mm 
lenses. 

An interesting solution to the hex key issue is the Really Right Stuff 
SmartPhone clamp. It has a nice mini hex key of the correct size magnetically 
secured right on it, so I always have one available even if I don’t have my key 
ring. :-)

But I keep a teensy tool roll of a few commonly used tools in my camera bags 
all the time anyway. It’s saved my butt on more occasions than I can remember 
to have a couple of hex keys, a small pliers, a pair of little screwdrivers, 
etc with me... 

G



—
Godfrey DiGiorgi - godfreydigio...@me.com - 408-431-4601
> On May 24, 2019, at 2:51 PM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:
> 
> Re: screw.
> I used to carry a keyring with many keys. I no longer do that, so, I
> wouldn't have a good place for a hex key, except for the photo bag pocket.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Igor PDML-StR]

orgot to mention, that I also agree with the guy in that video review 
about the lack of a better plate attachment screw (e.g. D-ring).



Re: price vs. Manfrotto.
P.J. has already pointed out that the direct competitor from Manfrotto, - 
BeFree costs $350, and it is currently on sale at B for $220. That's for 
the carbon fiber! The newer model, "BeFree Advanced" is $320 ($270 after 
MIR). And BeFree (both models) also weighs under 3 lbs (2.4-2.5 lbs).

However, it is a bit less compact than PD when folded.
Take a look at this review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p37OLkOSN70


It looks like that $220 price might be a clearance sale (for that older 
model), as it is out of stock on Manfrotto website, and I just was told

by Manfrotto support that its production ended in 2017.

I am tempted to pull a trigger on that (a great deal, IMHO), but
I am not using tripods that often, and when I do, - I travel by car.
But... maybe if I had such a light one


Hey, Larry, are you tempted?..  ;-)




Igor



Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 22 May 2019 15:43:12 -0700 wrote:

Oh yes: you don’t have to use PD plates. Any good A-S plate will do. There 
are plenty with safeties. The RC2 plates are never as stable or secure. Also, 
you can use any other head by getting the universal mount plate.



G


On May 22, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

All ball heads have some limitations on movement to portrait position. 
That’s
why they make L-plates ... and to keep the camera centered over the legs 
for

best stability.  Some of my other heads have even larger motion issues.

Of course, you can always just rotate the camera and plate 180 degrees on 
the

head if you need it to flop over the other way.

The price with head is less than my usual Manfrotto 190 and its A-S head.

G
—
No matter where you go, someone is always happy to receive your money.


On May 22, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:

I also thought that it is a clever design.
But I agree with the reviewer (link posted by Henk), that Manfrotto's 
Befree

seems to have a better (more secure) QR-plate design.
And the inability to go vertical on one of the sides is a bit annoying...
But everything else seems to be well-designed. Hopefully the manufacturing
quality is on par.

The price, however, bites: about $200 per pound is not that cheap! :)
(That's about what Japanese Kobe Beef Steaks cost, as I just found).


Igor







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

The PD Travel Tripod takes A-S style plates: PD plates are all A-S compatible. 
I mentioned Manfrotto RC2 because that was the example the video review pointed 
to for his complaint about no "auto lock" feature on the clamp. Personally, 
that think that comment is bollocks. NONE of my heads and clamps have an auto 
lock feature, and I've never dropped a camera off a tripod because I hadn't 
secured the clamp. Not once in fifty-plus years… 

I have several plates with D-ring added to the hex key securing solution. The 
D-ring nets nothing, particularly with a heavy camera and lens, because by the 
time I get the plate snug enough to not twist* in use, I need a tool to turn 
the D-ring with anyway … which is usually a hex key that I have on my keyring. 
Never mind that once the plate is snug enough, I can't take it off without 
using that same hex key on my keyring. 

* Best solution to the twisting issue is to get plates that have a ledge or are 
otherwise fitted for particular cameras such that they don't take much force 
and cannot twist no matter what. Most of my plates are like this, but some 
cameras do not lend themselves to this kind of design. But an allen key hanging 
on my key ring eliminates any need to have a D-ring at all (and I've found the 
D-rings break pretty often anyway). 

I have looked at the Manfrotto BeFree and found the Sirui T-025x CF (or its 
descendent) a superior tripod, with a superior ball head and universal plate 
included, for about $200 or so. It's sturdy enough IMO for smartphones and 
light cameras, but not a typical DSLR and/or any lens over about 100mm (FF 
equivalent). It's reasonably stable for ultrawides as long as I don't extend 
the column, and hopless with a Polaroid SX-70. The Manfrotto was worse in these 
respects. 

I don't expect everyone to want or need the $900 A-S Monoball P0 Hybrid that 
I'm in love with, but a good solid ball head with A-S compatible clamp is 
something like the Markins Q3i Traveler or Acratech Ultimate Ball Head for $300 
or so. Add my Manfrotto CF190pro3 legs for another $350 and that's kind of the 
minimum I'd consider for anything longer than a 200mm (eqFF) lens and DSLR 
setup of what's currently available. If the PD Travel Tripod approaches that 
level of sturdiness, with better quality build, it's a bargain. 

I probably use a tripod for 30% or more of my photography. I have four of them 
already (two sets of Manfrotto legs, the Feisol CT3442 Tournament, and the 
Sirui T-025x)d, and three table top tripods (one of which is nearly always in 
my bag…). If I had something as light and compact as this new PD that was also 
sturdy enough for my heavier gear (or ultrawide lenses, which need at least as 
sturdy a tripod as a big heavy telephoto!), I'd use it even more.

Yes, my Kickstarter pledge is already in place. :-)

G


> On May 23, 2019, at 7:52 AM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:
> 
> 
> Godfrey,
> 
> I wasn't sure: so, you are saying this tripod takes both A-S and RC2 plates 
> natively (i.e. without any adapters), right? That's nice!
> 
> As for L-plates or other heads, - that's all possible, but that
> adds wait and complexity, so, that would negate the big advantage of this 
> tripod: small weight (and compact size) + simplicity.
> 
> BTW, I forgot to mention, that I also agree with the guy in that video review 
> about the lack of a better plate attachment screw (e.g. D-ring).
> 
> 
> Re: price vs. Manfrotto.
> P.J. has already pointed out that the direct competitor from Manfrotto, - 
> BeFree costs $350, and it is currently on sale at B for $220. That's for 
> the carbon fiber! The newer model, "BeFree Advanced" is $320 ($270 after 
> MIR). And BeFree (both models) also weighs under 3 lbs (2.4-2.5 lbs).
> However, it is a bit less compact than PD when folded.
> Take a look at this review:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p37OLkOSN70
> 
> 
> It looks like that $220 price might be a clearance sale (for that older 
> model), as it is out of stock on Manfrotto website, and I just was told
> by Manfrotto support that its production ended in 2017.
> 
> I am tempted to pull a trigger on that (a great deal, IMHO), but
> I am not using tripods that often, and when I do, - I travel by car.
> But... maybe if I had such a light one
> 
> 
> Hey, Larry, are you tempted?..  ;-)
> 
> 
> Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 22 May 2019 15:43:12 -0700 wrote:
> 
> Oh yes: you don’t have to use PD plates. Any good A-S plate will do. There 
> are plenty with safeties. The RC2 plates are never as stable or secure. Also, 
> you can use any other head by getting the universal mount plate.
> 
>> On May 22, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> 
>> All ball heads have some limitations on movement to portrait position. That’s
>> why they make L-plates ... and to keep the camera cen

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Igor PDML-StR]

Godfrey,

I wasn't sure: so, you are saying this tripod takes both A-S and RC2 
plates natively (i.e. without any adapters), right? That's nice!


As for L-plates or other heads, - that's all possible, but that
adds wait and complexity, so, that would negate the big advantage of this 
tripod: small weight (and compact size) + simplicity.


BTW, I forgot to mention, that I also agree with the guy in that video 
review about the lack of a better plate attachment screw (e.g. D-ring).



Re: price vs. Manfrotto.
P.J. has already pointed out that the direct competitor from Manfrotto, - 
BeFree costs $350, and it is currently on sale at B for $220. That's for 
the carbon fiber! The newer model, "BeFree Advanced" is $320 ($270 after 
MIR). And BeFree (both models) also weighs under 3 lbs (2.4-2.5 lbs).

However, it is a bit less compact than PD when folded.
Take a look at this review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p37OLkOSN70


It looks like that $220 price might be a clearance sale (for that older 
model), as it is out of stock on Manfrotto website, and I just was told

by Manfrotto support that its production ended in 2017.

I am tempted to pull a trigger on that (a great deal, IMHO), but
I am not using tripods that often, and when I do, - I travel by car.
But... maybe if I had such a light one


Hey, Larry, are you tempted?..  ;-)




Igor



 Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 22 May 2019 15:43:12 -0700 wrote:

Oh yes: you don’t have to use PD plates. Any good A-S plate will do. There 
are plenty with safeties. The RC2 plates are never as stable or secure. 
Also, you can use any other head by getting the universal mount plate.



G


On May 22, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

All ball heads have some limitations on movement to portrait position. That’s
why they make L-plates ... and to keep the camera centered over the legs for
best stability.  Some of my other heads have even larger motion issues.

Of course, you can always just rotate the camera and plate 180 degrees on the
head if you need it to flop over the other way.

The price with head is less than my usual Manfrotto 190 and its A-S head.

G
—
No matter where you go, someone is always happy to receive your money.


On May 22, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:

I also thought that it is a clever design.
But I agree with the reviewer (link posted by Henk), that Manfrotto's Befree
seems to have a better (more secure) QR-plate design.
And the inability to go vertical on one of the sides is a bit annoying...
But everything else seems to be well-designed. Hopefully the manufacturing
quality is on par.

The price, however, bites: about $200 per pound is not that cheap! :)
(That's about what Japanese Kobe Beef Steaks cost, as I just found).


Igor





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[William Robb]

My Feisol tripods allow the legs to be folded backwards so that the
normally wasted space below the head is filled with the head.
It’s a great feature and takes several inches off the length of the folded
tripod.
The peak design looks cool, and will surely appeal to a number of people,
but for the most part it is a solution to a relatively non existent problem.
Who really needs a high tech tripod to hold their smartphone still?

bill

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:14 AM Bipin Gupta  wrote:

> Looks like a good Tripod. As a Design Engineer I think one does not need a
> fund of US $ 500,000 to re-design one. A tripod is NO Space Age gizmo. It
> is Lo-tech stuff.
> In fact I have a trapezoidal - almost triangular - leg design Tripod I
> bought in Dubai some 27 Years back - eliminates dead space  and minimises
> packed down size with an 8 Kg 4-Button Ball Head.
> Note a true Travel Tripod should fold down to NO MORE than 12 inch in
> height for easy storage either inside or outside the Camera Back Pack or
> Sling Bag.
> I am afraid someone is going to pocket a lot of easy money.
> Regards.
> Bipin
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Larry Colen]

I have a first generation benro travel flat tripod that I really quite 
like, this is the current product.

http://www.benrousa.com/travel-series/travel-flat.aspx

Since it folds flat, rather than into the cylindrical shape, it is much 
easier to pack in many situations.  It is not an ideal daily use tripod, 
especially with the modular center column, but it is reasonably stable, 
especially with an upgraded ball head, is exceptionally light and 
compact, and wasn't exorbitantly expensive (I bought mine used).


I would say that the new peak design tripod, at least in its first 
generation, is squarely in the delta between a clever idea and a good 
idea.  I sincerely hope that it works out well enough for them to 
develop a second generation with the inevitable bugs ironed out.


Eric Weir wrote on 5/21/19 11:23 AM:


I see I forgot to include the link to the Kickstarter video about the Peak 
Designs tripod:



On May 21, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:


I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago, 
and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty. 
With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their goal.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is 
deep."

- William Stafford


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

Oh yes: you don’t have to use PD plates. Any good A-S plate will do. There are 
plenty with safeties. The RC2 plates are never as stable or secure. Also, you 
can use any other head by getting the universal mount plate.

G

> On May 22, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
> 
> All ball heads have some limitations on movement to portrait position. That’s 
> why they make L-plates ... and to keep the camera centered over the legs for 
> best stability.  Some of my other heads have even larger motion issues. 
> 
> Of course, you can always just rotate the camera and plate 180 degrees on the 
> head if you need it to flop over the other way. 
> 
> The price with head is less than my usual Manfrotto 190 and its A-S head.  
> 
> G
> —
> No matter where you go, someone is always happy to receive your money. 
> 
>> On May 22, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:
>> 
>> I also thought that it is a clever design.
>> But I agree with the reviewer (link posted by Henk), that Manfrotto's Befree 
>> seems to have a better (more secure) QR-plate design.
>> And the inability to go vertical on one of the sides is a bit annoying...
>> But everything else seems to be well-designed. Hopefully the manufacturing 
>> quality is on par.
>> 
>> The price, however, bites: about $200 per pound is not that cheap! :)
>> (That's about what Japanese Kobe Beef Steaks cost, as I just found).
>> 
>> 
>> Igor
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

All ball heads have some limitations on movement to portrait position. That’s 
why they make L-plates ... and to keep the camera centered over the legs for 
best stability.  Some of my other heads have even larger motion issues. 

Of course, you can always just rotate the camera and plate 180 degrees on the 
head if you need it to flop over the other way. 

The price with head is less than my usual Manfrotto 190 and its A-S head.  

G
—
No matter where you go, someone is always happy to receive your money. 

> On May 22, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:
> 
> I also thought that it is a clever design.
> But I agree with the reviewer (link posted by Henk), that Manfrotto's Befree 
> seems to have a better (more secure) QR-plate design.
> And the inability to go vertical on one of the sides is a bit annoying...
> But everything else seems to be well-designed. Hopefully the manufacturing 
> quality is on par.
> 
> The price, however, bites: about $200 per pound is not that cheap! :)
> (That's about what Japanese Kobe Beef Steaks cost, as I just found).
> 
> 
> Igor


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Igor PDML-StR]

I also thought that it is a clever design.
But I agree with the reviewer (link posted by Henk), that Manfrotto's 
Befree seems to have a better (more secure) QR-plate design.

And the inability to go vertical on one of the sides is a bit annoying...
But everything else seems to be well-designed. Hopefully the 
manufacturing quality is on par.


The price, however, bites: about $200 per pound is not that cheap! :)
(That's about what Japanese Kobe Beef Steaks cost, as I just found).


Igor


Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 22 May 2019 09:38:34 -0700 wrote:

Perhaps not to design one, but to go into regular production on a new 
product that your company has never done before ... that takes some money. 
(Most people don't realize that any good quality software product like a 
word processor or a image editor typically costs a million dollars or more 
in development to get it out the door in production, only a modest portion 
of which is designing, writing, and testing the code...)



The design does look quite clever and it will fit nicely even in my larger 
sling type camera bags, never mind easily in my travel rollaway. At under 
3 lbs complete, it's quite handy I think.


G

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

Perhaps not to design one, but to go into regular production on a new product 
that your company has never done before ... that takes some money. (Most people 
don't realize that any good quality software product like a word processor or a 
image editor typically costs a million dollars or more in development to get it 
out the door in production, only a modest portion of which is designing, 
writing, and testing the code...)

The design does look quite clever and it will fit nicely even in my larger 
sling type camera bags, never mind easily in my travel rollaway. At under 3 lbs 
complete, it's quite handy I think. 

G


> On May 22, 2019, at 9:13 AM, Bipin Gupta  wrote:
> 
> As a Design Engineer I think one does not need a
> fund of US $ 500,000 to re-design one. A tripod is NO Space Age gizmo. It
> is Lo-tech stuff.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Bipin Gupta]

Looks like a good Tripod. As a Design Engineer I think one does not need a
fund of US $ 500,000 to re-design one. A tripod is NO Space Age gizmo. It
is Lo-tech stuff.
In fact I have a trapezoidal - almost triangular - leg design Tripod I
bought in Dubai some 27 Years back - eliminates dead space  and minimises
packed down size with an 8 Kg 4-Button Ball Head.
Note a true Travel Tripod should fold down to NO MORE than 12 inch in
height for easy storage either inside or outside the Camera Back Pack or
Sling Bag.
I am afraid someone is going to pocket a lot of easy money.
Regards.
Bipin
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Henk Terhell]

This is reviewed by Tony Northrup:
https://youtu.be/EAbytL3almE

Henk

Op 2019-05-21 om 18:45 schreef Eric Weir:

I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago, 
and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty. 
With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their goal.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is 
deep."

- William Stafford





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[P. J. Alling]

It's a $350 travel tripod,  $700 if you want carbon fiber. That's more 
than twice as expensive as an equivalent Manfrotto BeFree and the carbon 
fiber BeFree is on sale for $150 less than the Aluminum model.  I never 
thought that Manfrotto products were inexpensive before.


On 5/21/2019 2:23 PM, Eric Weir wrote:

I see I forgot to include the link to the Kickstarter video about the Peak 
Designs tripod:



On May 21, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:


I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago, 
and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty. 
With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their goal.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net

"(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is 
deep."

- William Stafford


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
- P.J. O'Rourke


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Eric Weir]

> On May 21, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Daniel J. Matyola  wrote:
> 
> Which one?

Mefoto tripod? Backpacker S with their least expensive smartphone adapter

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net 

"(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is 
deep."

- William Stafford


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Eric Weir]

I see I forgot to include the link to the Kickstarter video about the Peak 
Designs tripod:


> On May 21, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Eric Weir  wrote:
> 
> 
> I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago, 
> and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty. 
> With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their goal.
> 
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net 
> 
> "(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is 
> deep."
> 
> - William Stafford
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Which one?

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:46 PM Eric Weir  wrote:

>
> I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months
> ago, and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a
> beauty. With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their
> goal.
>
>
> --
> Eric Weir
> Decatur, GA  USA
> eew...@bellsouth.net
>
> "(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is
> deep."
>
> - William Stafford
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

It looks like we'll have a Peak Designs tripod.

[Eric Weir]

I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago, 
and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty. 
With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their goal.

--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA  USA
eew...@bellsouth.net 

"(I)t is important that awake people be awake... the darkness around us is 
deep."

- William Stafford


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[P.J. Alling]

That's interesting, on the K-5II which is what I have to hand, once the 
Jpeg option is set to cross processing, the camera cannot be set back to 
RAW until Cross-processing is set back to off.  I don't think there's 
anything you did.  I do think the firmware has a glitch that under some 
circumstance that you just happened to find, sets Raw+ to use the first 
selection in Cross-processing.


On 11/23/2015 2:51 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Looking into this, it appears that I somehow got JPEG set on
Cross-Processing and the first setting option is "RANDOM". How useful
is that? It's like having a whole squadron of Holgas, each with their
own unique light leaks and each loaded with different expired film.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:

Does it have a 1970s mode?



On 23 Nov 2015, at 19:27, Darren Addy  wrote:

Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an idea:

http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png




On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:

On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.

I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).

What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?

Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.






--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve 
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[John Francis]

I'm pretty sure the display you see on the back of the camera is
produced from the (low-quality) JPEG included in every image file.

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 07:39:49PM -0600, Darren Addy wrote:
> Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet.
> Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this
> weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show
> processing like that. I thought a RAW file was a RAW file.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Steve Sharpe  wrote:
> > The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot
> > exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these
> > otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't
> > pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the
> > sky was pink in one exposure, magenta in the next...etc. etc. To get it
> > back to reality and I had to reset the camera to the factory defaults
> > and then reprogramme it to my preferences.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:49:53 +1100, Rob Studdert wrote:
> >> I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my
> >> K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time
> >> to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long
> >> event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :(
> >>
> >> On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, John  wrote:
> >>> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance.
> >>>
> >>> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> 
>  Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you 
>  an
>  idea:
> 
>  http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png
> 
> 
> 
>  On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
> >
> > On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
> >> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
> >> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
> >>
> >> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
> >> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
> >> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
> >> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
> >> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
> >> different.
> >>
> >> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
> >> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
> >>
> >> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
> >>
> >
> > Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery
> >
> > d...@eastlink.ca
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Darren Addy]

Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet.
Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this
weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show
processing like that. I thought a RAW file was a RAW file.

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Steve Sharpe  wrote:
> The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot
> exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these
> otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't
> pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the
> sky was pink in one exposure, magenta in the next...etc. etc. To get it
> back to reality and I had to reset the camera to the factory defaults
> and then reprogramme it to my preferences.
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:49:53 +1100, Rob Studdert wrote:
>> I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my
>> K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time
>> to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long
>> event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :(
>>
>> On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, John  wrote:
>>> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance.
>>>
>>> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

 Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an
 idea:

 http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png



 On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
>
> On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
>> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
>> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
>>
>> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
>> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>> different.
>>
>> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
>> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
>>
>> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
>>
>
> Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
>
> ---
>
> Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery
>
> d...@eastlink.ca
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Steve Sharpe]

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:39:49 -0600, Darren Addy wrote:
> Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet.
> Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this
> weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show
> processing like that. I thought a RAW file was a RAW file.

Same here. I hope my camera isn't buggered up. 
---

Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery

d...@eastlink.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Steve Sharpe]

The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot 
exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these 
otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't 
pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the 
sky was pink in one exposure, magenta in the next...etc. etc. To get it 
back to reality and I had to reset the camera to the factory defaults 
and then reprogramme it to my preferences.


On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:49:53 +1100, Rob Studdert wrote:
> I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my
> K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time
> to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long
> event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :(
> 
> On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, John  wrote:
>> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance.
>> 
>> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>> 
>>> Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an
>>> idea:
>>> 
>>> http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
 
 On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> 
> 
> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
> 
> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
> different.
> 
> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
> 
> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
> 
 
 Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.

---

Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery

d...@eastlink.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Rob Studdert]

I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my
K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time
to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long
event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :(

On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, John  wrote:
> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance.
>
> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an
>> idea:
>>
>> http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:


 Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
 group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
 raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

 Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
 through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
 different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
 in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
 ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
 different.

 I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
 anything because of the error, but still annoying).

 What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?

>>>
>>> Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>>> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>>>
>
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[John]

Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance.

On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an idea:

http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png



On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:

On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:


Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.

I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).

What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?



Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Darren Addy]

Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an idea:

http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png



On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
> On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
>> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
>> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
>>
>> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
>> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>> different.
>>
>> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
>> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
>>
>> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
>>
>
> Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Bob W-PDML]

Does it have a 1970s mode?


> On 23 Nov 2015, at 19:27, Darren Addy  wrote:
> 
> Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an 
> idea:
> 
> http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
>>> On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
>>> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
>>> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
>>> 
>>> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
>>> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
>>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
>>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>>> different.
>>> 
>>> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
>>> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
>>> 
>>> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
>> 
>> Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
>> 
>> --
>> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Bob W-PDML]

I sorted out a similar problem for a friend yesterday - he was complaining that 
his new Canon p had suddenly started doing this random stuff, so I just reset 
it for him. It has a 'Beauty' setting which I think he'd set accidentally. Only 
such a thing could produce such hideous results.

B

> On 23 Nov 2015, at 15:27, Godfrey DiGiorgi  wrote:
> 
> Hmm. I wonder what camera has a "one-touch, randomized, Art Effect" mode 
> built in… ?? 
> Could be a salable option! :-)
> 
> G
> 
>> On Nov 22, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Darren Addy  wrote:
>> 
>> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
>> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
>> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
>> 
>> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
>> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
>> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
>> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
>> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
>> different.
>> 
>> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
>> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
>> 
>> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Darren Addy]

Looking into this, it appears that I somehow got JPEG set on
Cross-Processing and the first setting option is "RANDOM". How useful
is that? It's like having a whole squadron of Holgas, each with their
own unique light leaks and each loaded with different expired film.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> Does it have a 1970s mode?
>
>
>> On 23 Nov 2015, at 19:27, Darren Addy  wrote:
>>
>> Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an 
>> idea:
>>
>> http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:
 On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

 Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
 group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
 raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

 Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
 through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
 different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
 in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
 ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
 different.

 I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
 anything because of the error, but still annoying).

 What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
>>> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[John]

On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.

I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).

What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?



Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[ann sanfedele]

Can't wait for the answer to your puzzle - can we see the wacko jpgs?
(assuming you didn't delete)..  I've messed up color balance accidentally
and lots of other things but nothing like you describe - I'm too low
tech to make an truly educated guess, but is it possible it has 
something to do
with sequences of exposures for HDR stuff?  or just the way the look 
when you

chimp?  a possible malfunction of the display on the camera?

ann

On 11/23/2015 1:12 PM, John wrote:

On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.

I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).

What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?



Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[ann sanfedele]

oy!
ann

On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an idea:

http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png



On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John  wrote:

On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.

I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).

What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?


Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

Hmm. I wonder what camera has a "one-touch, randomized, Art Effect" mode built 
in… ?? 
Could be a salable option! :-)

G

> On Nov 22, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Darren Addy  wrote:
> 
> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.
> 
> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
> different.
> 
> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
> anything because of the error, but still annoying).
> 
> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...

[Darren Addy]

Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a
group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I
raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown.

Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not
through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked
different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme
in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all
ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each
different.

I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE
anything because of the error, but still annoying).

What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas?

-- 
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: ... Looks like PDML is alive again

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

That depends on whether the dingo is fetid or the dingo's kidney is fetid, I 
suspect. :-)

Godfrey


 On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
 
 So you don't need me to tell you who's been comparing you to a fetid
 dingo's kidney then ;-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: ... Looks like PDML is alive again

[Steve Cottrell]

On 15/1/15, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:

Getting posts now. It looks like the blockage has been dealt with. :-)

So you don't need me to tell you who's been comparing you to a fetid
dingo's kidney then ;-)

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: ... Looks like PDML is alive again

[Brian Walters]

Quoting Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv:


On 15/1/15, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:


Getting posts now. It looks like the blockage has been dealt with. :-)


So you don't need me to tell you who's been comparing you to a fetid
dingo's kidney then ;-)



First Bob wanted to change their native distribution to EnZed, now  
you.  What have you poms got against dingos all of a sudden?



--
Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: ... Looks like PDML is alive again

[Steve Cottrell]

On 16/1/15, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:

First Bob wanted to change their native distribution to EnZed, now  
you.  What have you poms got against dingos all of a sudden?

Or kidneys for that matter.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

... Looks like PDML is alive again

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

Getting posts now. It looks like the blockage has been dealt with. :-)

G

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Looks like another Chicago PDML meet-up is on!

[Mark Roberts]

So I arrived in Chicago last night. A trouble-free flight and easy
trip in to the hotel. Had a great dinner at a rather posh restaurant
with a bunch of pathologists. Lisa's on a pretty big deal committee
in this organization so they get the good stuff. Some very nice
people, I must admit.

Since the planned PDML meet is for Saturday I wanted to get a good run
in today. Glorious, sunny and warm, it was! I ran on the lake front,
missed my turnaround point because I'm not familiar with Chicago and
ended up running about 15 miles instead of 12. Oh well.

Tomorrow I should be meeting with Christing Aguila and Bob Sulivan.
We'll see what happens.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like another Chicago PDML meet-up is on!

[Christine Aguila]

Be sure to let us know where we are meeting!   :-)  Cheers, Christine


 On Oct 24, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
 
 So I arrived in Chicago last night. A trouble-free flight and easy
 trip in to the hotel. Had a great dinner at a rather posh restaurant
 with a bunch of pathologists. Lisa's on a pretty big deal committee
 in this organization so they get the good stuff. Some very nice
 people, I must admit.
 
 Since the planned PDML meet is for Saturday I wanted to get a good run
 in today. Glorious, sunny and warm, it was! I ran on the lake front,
 missed my turnaround point because I'm not familiar with Chicago and
 ended up running about 15 miles instead of 12. Oh well.
 
 Tomorrow I should be meeting with Christing Aguila and Bob Sulivan.
 We'll see what happens.
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like another Chicago PDML meet-up is on!

[Larry Colen]

Christine Aguila wrote:

Be sure to let us know where we are meeting!   :-)  Cheers, Christine


Yeah, that can be a problem in Chicago. :-)

--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Larry Colen]

I did quickly scan through the video, and while I'm not enamored with 
the photo, I actually learned a couple of useful bits on the quick scan 
 of the video.  If the goal of the video was to give a quick overview 
of lightroom, it seems to be successful.



Igor PDML-StR wrote:


I am with Paul on this.

Igor


Paul Stenquist Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:56:36 -0700 wrote:

I don't hate this type of image. It.s surreal, but I think there's a
place for that.
On Oct 14, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:



... please, someone just shoot me.

http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068


I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
/rant




--
Larry Colen  l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Darren Addy]

... please, someone just shoot me.

http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068

I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
/rant
-- 
Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs
look like photographs.
~ Alfred Stieglitz

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Paul Stenquist]

I don’t hate this type of image. It’s surreal, but I think there’s a place for 
that. 
On Oct 14, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:

 ... please, someone just shoot me.
 
 http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068
 
 I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
 Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
 colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
 /rant
 -- 
 Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their photographs
 look like photographs.
 ~ Alfred Stieglitz
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Igor PDML-StR]

I am with Paul on this.

Igor


 Paul Stenquist Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:56:36 -0700 wrote:

I don't hate this type of image. It.s surreal, but I think there's a place 
for that.

On Oct 14, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:



... please, someone just shoot me.

http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068

I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
/rant


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Daniel J. Matyola]

I also agree.  It's not MY style, but I don't really hated it.

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Igor PDML-StR pdml...@komkon.org wrote:

 I am with Paul on this.

 Igor


  Paul Stenquist Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:56:36 -0700 wrote:

 I don't hate this type of image. It.s surreal, but I think there's a place
 for that.
 On Oct 14, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:


 ... please, someone just shoot me.


 http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068

 I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
 Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
 colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
 /rant


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Ann Sanfedele]

Yikes!

Request noted :-)

ann

On 10/14/2014 13:30, Darren Addy wrote:

... please, someone just shoot me.

http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068

I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
/rant



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Bruce Walker]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 ... please, someone just shoot me.

 http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068

 I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
 Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
 colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
 /rant

Okay, so no black and white landscapes allowed then.

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: If I ever present a post-processed PESO that looks like this....

[Mark Roberts]

Bruce Walker wrote:

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 ... please, someone just shoot me.

 http://petapixel.com/2014/10/14/comprehensive-tutorial-post-process-almost-aspect-single-exposure-landscape-shot/#more-148068

 I call this the Thomas Kinkade School of Photographic
 Post-Processing. I tend to believe that at least one or two of the
 colors in the image should be found in actual scene seen.
 /rant

Okay, so no black and white landscapes allowed then.

Zing!
;-)
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like........

[Mark C]

I hate it when I do stuff like that. I was travelling for work this week 
and had the Q with me, and enabled the built in ND filter for some 
daytime shots. I *thought* I disabled it but didn't - it did not help 
with shooting deer at sunset.


Mark

On 5/28/2013 6:12 PM, David J Brooks wrote:

back on May 7th 2013 i switch the K-5 over to spot metering for some
flowers shots. This now explains why a lot of my steam engine shots
were a bit over exposed as were the videos.

Must check settings more than once a month

Dave

--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like........

[John Sessoms]

From: David J Brooks

back on May 7th 2013 i switch the K-5 over to spot metering for some
flowers shots. This now explains why a lot of my steam engine shots
were a bit over exposed as were the videos.

Must check settings more than once a month

Dave


Also check the date  time periodically ... something I learned from not
checking it frequently enough.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Looks like........

[David J Brooks]

back on May 7th 2013 i switch the K-5 over to spot metering for some
flowers shots. This now explains why a lot of my steam engine shots
were a bit over exposed as were the videos.

Must check settings more than once a month

Dave

--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like........

[Tim Øsleby]

Dave, Dave, Dave.
--
MaritimTim

My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/


To err is human
to arr is pirate



2013/5/29 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
 back on May 7th 2013 i switch the K-5 over to spot metering for some
 flowers shots. This now explains why a lot of my steam engine shots
 were a bit over exposed as were the videos.

 Must check settings more than once a month

 Dave

 --
 Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
 www.caughtinmotion.com
 http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
 York Region, Ontario, Canada

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like........

[Bill]

On 28/05/2013 4:12 PM, David J Brooks wrote:

back on May 7th 2013 i switch the K-5 over to spot metering for some
flowers shots. This now explains why a lot of my steam engine shots
were a bit over exposed as were the videos.

Must check settings more than once a month
I used to bitch and moan about how unreliable the exposure was on the 
Pentax DSLRs, until I realized that every time I had exposure problems, 
I had accidentally whacked the meter into spot.


bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Looks like ...

[Collin Brendemuehl]

...I can get the K5 at close to the price I want.
So my K-x is FS.  It's on da bay, but if anyone is interested ...


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Steve Cottrell]

On 8/12/12, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:

 https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

Enjoy ;)

Nice gallery mate. Some of those are stunning. Is that your little man btw?

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 17:03,  eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
 Some nice photographs here. Like the bottle and  the blue man (outdoor
 sculpture?). Had to look at both twice.

Hi Marnie,

Thanks, yes those two shots and a few other shots were from a set
captured at Sculptures by the Sea in Sydney, some really interesting
works there.

 But I  really love the wide shot of the rocks, #29. Very peaceful, nicely
 composed,  lovely shot.

Thanks again, that was shot on the shores of Lake Jindabyne in the
Australian Snowy Mountains, a beautiful piece of country with really
limitless photo opportunities.

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 21:23, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:

 Nice gallery mate. Some of those are stunning. Is that your little man btw?

Hi Cotty, Thanks, yeah that's the little guy, he's 6 and a bit now and
seems to be and turning out OK :)

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: GESO It looks like a keeper

[knarftheria...@gmail.com]

Wow! Distortion looks impressively low!

Great shots, too. Love View. Art or corporate logo?

cheers,
frank 

--- Original Message ---

From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com
Sent: December 7, 2012 12/7/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: GESO It looks like a keeper

Hi Team,

Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
since it was purchased:

 https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

Enjoy ;)

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Really fine images there!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola


On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
 Wow! Distortion looks impressively low!

 Great shots, too. Love View. Art or corporate logo?

 cheers,
 frank

 --- Original Message ---

 From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com
 Sent: December 7, 2012 12/7/12
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: GESO It looks like a keeper

 Hi Team,

 Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
 lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
 were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
 zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
 out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
 have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

 Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
 since it was purchased:

  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

 Enjoy ;)

 Cheers,

 --
 Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
 Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
 Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rick Womer]

Rob, there are some gorgeous photos there, none of which I recall having been a 
PESO.

The concert pix are good enough to have made my tinnitus act up...

Cheers,

Rick
 
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 10:46 PM
Subject: GESO It looks like a keeper

Hi Team,

Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
since it was purchased:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

Enjoy ;)

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Bruce Walker]

Great stuff, Rob. That does indeed look like an excellent lens find.
Does the HSM focusing work well for you?


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Team,

 Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
 lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
 were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
 zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
 out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
 have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

 Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
 since it was purchased:

  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

 Enjoy ;)

 Cheers,

 --
 Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
 Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
 Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



--
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 8 December 2012 15:14, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
 Rob,
 Nice pictures and quite a recommendation, coming from you.
 The last recommendation I remember is the Voightlander 125/2.5, a great lens.

HI Bob,

Thanks, I certainly don't mind recommending something that I find
useful and this lens was definitely something that has returned to me
scope that has been missing from my kit since the APS DSLRs came
along. I sold my old A15/3.5 years ago as it was pretty useless on the
DSLRs, I still have my A16/2.8 and will keep it in the remote hope of
a K mount FF DSLR but I do miss what those two lenses could do on a
film body. So now I'm half way there.

WRT the Voightlander that lens is one of the reasons that I will
consider Nikon as I bought one in Nikon mount some years ago in
anticipation, glad too as they are now $3500 used.

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 03:36, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
 Wow! Distortion looks impressively low!

 Great shots, too. Love View. Art or corporate logo?

Thanks Frank, there is some distortion but yeah for the most part it's
practically no problem, it's fast too.

Art, Sculptures by the Sea, Sydney 2012 :)

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 06:13, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Rob, there are some gorgeous photos there, none of which I recall having been 
 a PESO.

Hi Rick,

Thanks, you are correct, not many of my recent images have made it to
the list unfortunately, I've been busy or slack or

 The concert pix are good enough to have made my tinnitus act up

Yes, I have some hi-fi attenuating earplugs standard kit in my camera
case, a necessity!

Cheers,

Rob

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 05:32, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
 Really fine images there!

Thanks Dan ;)

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 06:27, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
 Great stuff, Rob. That does indeed look like an excellent lens find.
 Does the HSM focusing work well for you?

Hi Bruce,

Thanks, I'm impressed, I've been out a few times where it's been my
primary lens for the day, I forgot how much I missed having an
ultra-wide in my arsenal. The focus seems OK but I haven't been too
critical as the DOF is so deep at normal shooting distances, I will
eventually get a bit more critical with it and I'll report any
anomalies. Thankfully it's not like my Sigma 14/2.8 which can't focus
when the aperture is set above f5 ;(

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Tom C]

 From: Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com

 Hi Team,

 Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
 lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
 were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
 zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
 out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
 have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

 Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
 since it was purchased:

 https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

 Enjoy ;)

#4 and #20 are real standouts among other nice ones Rob.

Tom C.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re:GESO It looks like a keeper

[Don Guthrie]

Quite a nice little gallery Rob. I was taken with how many of your 
photos were vertical. Cropped or shot that way? I have the same lens and 
use it a lot but I have never been really happy with verticals shot that 
way.





pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 14:46:42 +1100
From: Rob Studdertdistudio.p...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: GESO It looks like a keeper
Message-ID:
CAD8AEd7LfgEorx6BewqtonP=ovjb-8ktvm59xk6e61kpeuw...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Team,

Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
since it was purchased:

  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

Enjoy;)

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudi



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 09:47, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:

 #4 and #20 are real standouts among other nice ones Rob.

Thanks Tom, interesting choices :)

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Rob Studdert]

On 9 December 2012 10:23, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
 Quite a nice little gallery Rob. I was taken with how many of your photos
 were vertical. Cropped or shot that way? I have the same lens and use it a
 lot but I have never been really happy with verticals shot that way.

Hi Don,

Thanks for the feedback. I don't think that any were cropped in that
set. I generally don't crop, all the images in that set were all
produced from in camera jpgs and came straight out of Picasa with at
most some contrast correction. Most of my images are shot vertical
these days, it would generally average out to about 5 verticals to one
horizontal shot independent of lens I expect.

Cheers,

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Eactivist]

Some nice photographs here. Like the bottle and  the blue man (outdoor 
sculpture?). Had to look at both twice.

But I  really love the wide shot of the rocks, #29. Very peaceful, nicely 
composed,  lovely shot.

Marnie aka Doe :-)

In a message dated 12/7/2012  7:46:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, 
distudio.p...@gmail.com  writes:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk  


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: GESO It looks like a keeper

[Bob Sullivan]

Rob,
Nice pictures and quite a recommendation, coming from you.
The last recommendation I remember is the Voightlander 125/2.5, a great lens.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Team,

 Well about 4 months ago I purchased a Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
 lens based on the reports of some PDMLers here. The Pentax offerings
 were just way too costly for the specs and didn't offer the speed or
 zoom range that I really needed in an Ultra-wide zoom. The Sigma turns
 out to be what was suggested, a very well built and capable lens as
 have been the other new Sigma zooms that I have recently purchased.

 Following is a small sample of images that were shot with this lens
 since it was purchased:

  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8z81twcbbjvaykw/IWj4gZ4EAk

 Enjoy ;)

 Cheers,

 --
 Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
 Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
 Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Polaroid Camera looks like a phone

[Steven Desjardins]

Further down the page on PetaPixel:

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/01/11/polaroid-unveils-new-android-powered-camera-that-looks-like-a-phone/

Put in phone capabilities and I'd consider it.

-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Polaroid Camera looks like a phone

[David Parsons]

If I didn't already have an iPod Touch, I might consider something like this.

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
 Further down the page on PetaPixel:

 http://www.petapixel.com/2012/01/11/polaroid-unveils-new-android-powered-camera-that-looks-like-a-phone/

 Put in phone capabilities and I'd consider it.

 --
 Steve Desjardins

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com

Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like someone got hacked

[Larry Colen]

Careful what links you click on

On 10/21/2011 1:39 AM, Jerry in Arizona wrote:

hello! http://www.jesusgarciaartglass.com/friends.php?jsyahooID=3xr2



--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (from dos4est)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like someone got hacked

[Mark Roberts]

Larry Colen wrote:

Careful what links you click on

On 10/21/2011 1:39 AM, Jerry in Arizona wrote:
 hello! http://www.jesusgarciaartglass.com/friends.php?jsyahooID=3xr2

I can guess without even looking what's at that link: It's a hacked
PHP page that redirects to the spammer's real web site, which is a
Romanian-hosted prescription drug sales operation calling itself
Canadian Pharmacy or some such.

The spammer hacks someone else's email so they can't easily be tracked
or blocked and hacks someone else's web site so the email is unlikely
to be filtered on the basis of the URL. And Romanian hosts don't give
a shit that they're hosting spammers making illegal prescription drug
sales.

How close did I come?
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like someone got hacked

[David J Brooks]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
 Larry Colen wrote:

Careful what links you click on

On 10/21/2011 1:39 AM, Jerry in Arizona wrote:
 hello! http://www.jesusgarciaartglass.com/    friends.php?jsyahooID=3xr2

 I can guess without even looking what's at that link: It's a hacked
 PHP page that redirects to the spammer's real web site, which is a
 Romanian-hosted prescription drug sales operation calling itself
 Canadian Pharmacy or some such.

 The spammer hacks someone else's email so they can't easily be tracked
 or blocked and hacks someone else's web site so the email is unlikely
 to be filtered on the basis of the URL. And Romanian hosts don't give
 a shit that they're hosting spammers making illegal prescription drug
 sales.

 How close did I come?

I bet you watched the Mr Knowitall segment on Rocky and Bullwinkle,
didn't you.   :-)

Dave

 --
 Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
 www.robertstech.com





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like someone got hacked

[John Sessoms]

From: David J Brooks

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:

Larry Colen wrote:


Careful what links you click on

On 10/21/2011 1:39 AM, Jerry in Arizona wrote:

hello! http://www.jesusgarciaartglass.com/ ? ?friends.php?jsyahooID=3xr2

I can guess without even looking what's at that link: It's a hacked
PHP page that redirects to the spammer's real web site, which is a
Romanian-hosted prescription drug sales operation calling itself
Canadian Pharmacy or some such.

The spammer hacks someone else's email so they can't easily be tracked
or blocked and hacks someone else's web site so the email is unlikely
to be filtered on the basis of the URL. And Romanian hosts don't give
a shit that they're hosting spammers making illegal prescription drug
sales.

How close did I come?

I bet you watched the Mr Knowitall segment on Rocky and Bullwinkle,
didn't you.

Dave


According to the Google diagnostics it redirects to a .ms domain, which 
would be Montserrat, but I guess they could be lying about that too.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like someone got hacked

[David Mann]

On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:10 AM, John Sessoms wrote:

 According to the Google diagnostics it redirects to a .ms domain, which would 
 be Montserrat, but I guess they could be lying about that too.

I propose a field trip to find out.

Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Looks like BH has the Q system in stock

[P. J. Alling]

Well, at least the bodies with Standard lenses for MSRP.

I'm not going to say anything bad or good about it since I haven't 
actually handled one, but since about the only Pentax equipment I get to 
handle these days is stuff I've actually bought, I guess I'll never say 
anything about the Q.


--
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

[P. J. Alling]

Seems the inability of the FA 43 not being able to achieve focus lock at 
middle distances was a harbinger of doom.  The focus is jammed solid.  Damn.


--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral 
bankruptcy.
 -Woody Allen


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

[P. J. Alling]

On 11/24/2010 1:40 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Seems the inability of the FA 43 not being able to achieve focus lock 
at middle distances was a harbinger of doom.  The focus is jammed 
solid.  Damn.



It's worse that I thought, looks like the aperture is jammed solid too.

--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral 
bankruptcy.
 -Woody Allen


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

[drd1135]

Sorry. Do you just send that off to Pentax for repair?  I'm curious.  Do they 
give you an estimate?
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:40:34 
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

Seems the inability of the FA 43 not being able to achieve focus lock at 
middle distances was a harbinger of doom.  The focus is jammed solid.  Damn.

-- 
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed 
moral bankruptcy.
  -Woody Allen


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

[Walter Gilbert]

 Damn, indeed.  Sorry to hear that.

Another reason lens prices depress the hell out of me.

-- Walt

On 11/24/2010 12:45 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

On 11/24/2010 1:40 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Seems the inability of the FA 43 not being able to achieve focus lock 
at middle distances was a harbinger of doom.  The focus is jammed 
solid.  Damn.



It's worse that I thought, looks like the aperture is jammed solid too.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

[P. J. Alling]

On 11/24/2010 1:51 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:

Sorry. Do you just send that off to Pentax for repair?  I'm curious.  Do they 
give you an estimate?
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:40:34
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

Seems the inability of the FA 43 not being able to achieve focus lock at
middle distances was a harbinger of doom.  The focus is jammed solid.  Damn.


I was actually going to send if off to Eric Hendrickson 
http://pentaxs.com/index.html he's an old time Pentax repair guy.  
I've had dealings with him in the recent past, gives estimates and was 
able to bring my A*24mm f2.8, which I dropped, back from the seeming 
dead.  He also fixed the focus problem I had with the A*300mm f4.0.  He 
give estimates and his prices are very reasonable.  However he doesn't 
have a large supply of spares, if he can't repair the 43mm because it 
needs parts, it's off to Pentax. who also give you an estimate, I 
haven't used them in years though, I was soured on them when they 
wouldn't repair my MX under warranty, which just shows you how long I'll 
carry a grudge, I'll only send Pentax gear that I cannot get repaired 
anywhere else.



--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral 
bankruptcy.
 -Woody Allen


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like the FA 43mm is going of for repair.

[Miserere]

On 24 November 2010 14:01, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:

 I was actually going to send if off to Eric Hendrickson
 http://pentaxs.com/index.html he's an old time Pentax repair guy.  I've
 had dealings with him in the recent past, gives estimates and was able to
 bring my A*24mm f2.8, which I dropped, back from the seeming dead.  He also
 fixed the focus problem I had with the A*300mm f4.0.  He give estimates and
 his prices are very reasonable.  However he doesn't have a large supply of
 spares, if he can't repair the 43mm because it needs parts, it's off to
 Pentax. who also give you an estimate, I haven't used them in years though,
 I was soured on them when they wouldn't repair my MX under warranty, which
 just shows you how long I'll carry a grudge, I'll only send Pentax gear that
 I cannot get repaired anywhere else.

And when you say send to Pentax, you now mean send to CRIS. I
believe you can get an estimate online; at least you can for camera
issues. Their prices seem to be flat rate, which means you'll get a
good price for a big problem, but a bad price for a little problem.

Best of luck, P.J.; I feel for ya.


   —M.

\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Looks like I'm joining the Brotherhood

[Steven Desjardins]

Wow, I didn't know they came in flavors.

Sounds fun.It's a camera I always wanted have.  I could get one now,
but, at least for me, that time has passed.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
 I just had a mint original 6x7 with a 105/2.4, left-hand grip and case
 put aside at the local pusher. Just waiting on some Nikon kit I'm
 selling to go to pay for it

 -Adam

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Looks like I'm joining the Brotherhood

[Adam Maas]

I just had a mint original 6x7 with a 105/2.4, left-hand grip and case
put aside at the local pusher. Just waiting on some Nikon kit I'm
selling to go to pay for it

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: This looks like a must have for folks going to GFM

[Cotty]

On 30/4/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:

http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/2639451/294218458/name/RedGreensHolder%2Ewmv

Thanks Larry, best laugh of the day

--


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)  | People, Places, Pastiche
--  http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: This looks like a must have for folks going to GFM

[eckinator]

2010/5/1 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
 http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/2639451/294218458/name/RedGreensHolder%2Ewmv

And it will even fit into your
http://www.zbattery.com/Maglite-Plain-Leather-Belt-Holster-for-D-Size-Flashlights
Go get two!!!
ROFLMAO
Ecke

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: This looks like a must have for folks going to GFM

[AlunFoto]

2010/5/1 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com:
 2010/5/1 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
 http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/2639451/294218458/name/RedGreensHolder%2Ewmv

 And it will even fit into your
 http://www.zbattery.com/Maglite-Plain-Leather-Belt-Holster-for-D-Size-Flashlights
 Go get two!!!

hehe.
For drinking with both hands.


-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

This looks like a must have for folks going to GFM

[Larry Colen]

http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/2639451/294218458/name/RedGreensHolder%2Ewmv
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

[mike wilson]

 Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: 
 On 23 February 2010 04:06, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
 
   Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
  So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
  I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...
 
 
  We're sorry, the price is two kidneys.  PLease find enclosed one lens 
  hood.
 
 At least it's an adjustable lens hood so I can also use it on my
 Pentax FF, whose release is inevitable (if the other thread is to be
 believed).
 
 I think that flexibility is worth the extra kidney.

Plus postage.  Please send your liver.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

[mike wilson]

 Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote: 
 So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
 I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...


We're sorry, the price is two kidneys.  PLease find enclosed one lens hood.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

[Miserere]

On 23 February 2010 04:06, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:

  Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
 So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
 I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...


 We're sorry, the price is two kidneys.  PLease find enclosed one lens hood.

At least it's an adjustable lens hood so I can also use it on my
Pentax FF, whose release is inevitable (if the other thread is to be
believed).

I think that flexibility is worth the extra kidney.


 --M.



-- 

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

[Larry Colen]

I was poking around in the silly hope that the various colors of K-x  
announced for Europe would be coming to the states.  As most people  
expected, there weren't really any announcements from Pentax, though  
Sigma seems to have announced some lenses that could be rather  
interesting if they have good image quality for the cost. Fast glass  
is always appealing to me.


My 20/1.8 is back from Sigma and the nasty bumpiness in the focus may  
be gone. Time will tell, and I've been happy with the optics on it.


85/1.4  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022015sigma85mm.asp

I've been surprised at how often the 2/3 stop of 1.4 over 1.8 comes in  
handy.  The little bit of extra reach and especially speed of this  
over my 77/1.8 could be handy. I'm sure the optics would be better  
than the Korean 85/1.4. Though I love my 77/1.8 so much that it's hard  
to imagine my using anything else in it's range when I didn't  
absolutely need the little extra bit of speed.


70-200/2.8  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022016sigma70mm200mm.asp

I doubt it would be nearly as nice as the Pentax 80-200/2.8, but it'd  
probably be a lot more affordable.


17-50 / 2.8 http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022014sigma17mm50mm.asp

Same as above but with the 16-50.

8-16mm F4.5-5.6 rectilinear  
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022011sigma8mm16mm.asp
If you're going to go wide, this could be very interesting.

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

[Miserere]

Larry,

I also have the 77 Ltd, but sometimes I just need that extra 2/3 stop
(for example when shooting live music). I'm waiting to see what the
price on this Sigma 85mm is going to be, but I suspect it won't be
cheap. This from DPR talking to Sigma Chief Operating Officer, Kazuto
Yamaki, at the PMA 2010:

FLD elements are also used in the [Sigma] 85mm F1.4, which has been
attracting a lot of attention at the show. 'It's similar in concept to
the 50mm F1.4 - it's bigger, heavier and more expensive than OEM
lenses but achieves higher performance,' says Yamaki.

'We've made this for professional and advance amateur photographers,'
he explained: 'we've tried to achieve better performance [than the OEM
equivalents], particularly when using fully open apertures on the
latest DSLRs.'


So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...


 --M



-- 

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment




On 22 February 2010 06:33, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
 I was poking around in the silly hope that the various colors of K-x
 announced for Europe would be coming to the states.  As most people
 expected, there weren't really any announcements from Pentax, though Sigma
 seems to have announced some lenses that could be rather interesting if they
 have good image quality for the cost. Fast glass is always appealing to me.

 My 20/1.8 is back from Sigma and the nasty bumpiness in the focus may be
 gone. Time will tell, and I've been happy with the optics on it.

 85/1.4  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022015sigma85mm.asp

 I've been surprised at how often the 2/3 stop of 1.4 over 1.8 comes in
 handy.  The little bit of extra reach and especially speed of this over my
 77/1.8 could be handy. I'm sure the optics would be better than the Korean
 85/1.4. Though I love my 77/1.8 so much that it's hard to imagine my using
 anything else in it's range when I didn't absolutely need the little extra
 bit of speed.

 70-200/2.8  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022016sigma70mm200mm.asp

 I doubt it would be nearly as nice as the Pentax 80-200/2.8, but it'd
 probably be a lot more affordable.

 17-50 / 2.8 http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022014sigma17mm50mm.asp

 Same as above but with the 16-50.

 8-16mm F4.5-5.6 rectilinear
  http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022011sigma8mm16mm.asp
 If you're going to go wide, this could be very interesting.

 --
 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: It looks like Sigma announced some interesting looking lenses

[Larry Colen]

On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Miserere wrote:


Larry,


  ___ Sigma 85/1.4 ___



So, on the one hand I'm expecting a very good lens, on the other hand
I'm expecting to have my kidney to send over to BH. We'll see...



I really don't need to hear about great lenses that are not cheap.   
John did me the favor of loaning me his 16-50 to shoot the belt tests  
at the dojo.  I haven't seen the pictures yet, but from a sheer  
usability level I'm afraid that I like it just a little bit too much.


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: So, that's what it looks like...

[frank theriault]

2009/8/30 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
 ...when Nikodemus holds his siesta behind my laptop. Only visible
 because I had not yet reconnected the computer after yesterday's trip to
 Belgium. Usually, you'll just hear him snore.

 Click on picture to enlarge.

 http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com/2009/08/so-sieht-das-also-aus.html


Only a cat...

;-)

Fun shot.

cheers,
frank



-- 
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.