Re: OT: Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-24 Thread Terence Mac Goff

Would an Auto 110 (or even a Super) be an option? its a fine little camera, 
with quite a rnage of lenses (sharp too!)

T.

At 11:53 24/05/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are gracious, Dan. Truth be old, the only cameras I've used, other than
a couple consumer-oriented point-and-shoots before the mid 80s, are my two
Minox 35s, my Olympus XA, my Super Programs, and my newly acquired Yashica
Electro 35 GX. That's IT! I'm simply an able scavenger of information from
magazines, websites, and discussion groups like the two that I named.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Daphne

Minox 35 GT!!! just got mine and its perfect :-))

Daphne

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Steve Cottrell

Hi Shel,

I use an Olympus XA-2. It's very small, has a sliding cover for the 35mm 
f3.5 Zuiko, built-in lens which means it really does fit in a pocket, has 
a fully de-mountable flash, 3-setting focus, ISO dial-in from 25-800, 
self-timer, very quiet electronic shutter. Where I go, it goes.

The Olympus XA is a better-specced camera, and if I ever get around to it 
I would get one, but the little XA-2 just soldiers on.

HTH

Cotty

I'm looking for a small, pocketable, full-frame 35mm camera, perhaps
a bit smaller than the Canon GIII.  Requirements are:

Minimal features (built-in meter that can be overridden would be
nice)
Quiet, unobtrusive operation
Minimum shutter lag - prefer focal plane shutter w/up to 1/1000
No pop-up flash, red-eye reduction, etc.
Good build quality
No autofocus

Any suggestions?


___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads 
www.macads.co.uk


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Provencher, Paul M.

How big is your pocket?
How big is your pocketbook?

:-)

Paul M. Provencher
(being impertinent)


-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7:30 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Pocketable Camera


I'm looking for a small, pocketable, full-frame 35mm camera, perhaps
a bit smaller than the Canon GIII.  Requirements are:

Minimal features (built-in meter that can be overridden would be
nice)
Quiet, unobtrusive operation
Minimum shutter lag - prefer focal plane shutter w/up to 1/1000
No pop-up flash, red-eye reduction, etc.
Good build quality
No autofocus

Any suggestions?
-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... there is no point in pressing the shutter 
unless you are making some caustic comment 
on the incongruities of life - Phillip Jones Griffiths
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Provencher, Paul M. wrote:
 
 How big is your pocket?

Depends on the shirt I'm wearing.  I'd like to be able to carry the
camera in a small shirt pocket or in my jeans.

 How big is your pocketbook?

My pocketbook is huge, although now it's pretty close to empty.  I
don't want to spend more than about $150.00 - $200.00. :-(

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... there is no point in pressing the shutter 
unless you are making some caustic comment 
on the incongruities of life - Phillip Jones Griffiths
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Dan Scott

Forgot to mention, all of these do violate your no autofocus, but a few
offer both.

Have fun,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Dan Scott

Hi Shel,

Paul covered the original compacts very thoroughly. If you are looking for
something of more recent vintage you might want to check out some of these
(all feature exp. compensation, many have adj. diopters, spot metering, and
metal bodies):

Ricoh GR1s, 28mm (Camera Traders Ltd. has lowest US $, BH has specs)

Canon Sure Shot Classic 120 Zoom, 38-120mm

Contax T3, 35mm Zeiss Sonnar T*
Contax Tvs III, 30-60mm Zeiss T* Vario Sonnar

Fuji DL Super Mini Zoom, 28-56mm

Konica LEXIO-70 Zoom, 28-70mm

Leica C1 Zoom, 38-105mm Vario-Elmar
Leica Minilux, 40mm Summarit
Leica Minilux Zoom, 35-70mm Vario-Elmar
Leica Z2X Zoom, 35-70mm Vario-Elmar

Minolta TC-1, 28mm

Rollei Prego 115 Zoom, 38-115mm
Rollei QZ35(all versions)

Unfortunately, no personal experience with any of them. Too bad Pentax
doesn't come out with a fast 50mm (or a 43mm) PS with exposure comp., Av
Tv and bracketing, as it looks like a cushy niche.

Have fun,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm looking for a small, pocketable, full-frame 35mm camera, perhaps
a bit smaller than the Canon GIII.  Requirements are:

Minimal features (built-in meter that can be overridden would be
nice)
Quiet, unobtrusive operation
Minimum shutter lag - prefer focal plane shutter w/up to 1/1000
No pop-up flash, red-eye reduction, etc.
Good build quality
No autofocus

Any suggestions?
- --

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Paul . Stregevsky

Dan,

Thanks for brining the lineup up-to-date. I was unaware that you could get
spot metering on a contemporary compact.

With most the models that you've named have fine lenses and other strong
points, their extensive automation makes them a different breed from the
flexible manual-focus models of the 70s.


Among the lunder-$300 contemporary compacts, few permit you to override the
film's DX setting for an entire roll. If She wanted to rate a 400 film at
250, he'd have to override each shot, frame by frame.

The highly regarded 28mm, f/2.8 Ricoh GR1, like the 28/3.5 Olympus XA-4 of
the 1980s, offers full-program exposure only--no program shift. Even if it
allows exposure compensation, you're at the mercy of the program that Ricoh
has built into the exposure curve. You have no knowledge of, or control
over, the shutter speed or aperture being used.

Of course, virtually all compacts but the old Yashicas allow you to depress
the shutter release halfway to lock the exposure.


It sounds as though Shel is looking for a camera that can serve him without
flash. On these grounds alone, I'm afraid all the zoom models except
perhaps the Contax Tvs III and Rollei QZ35 must be ruled out. Not only are
zooms slower than the fixed-lens models; on most of them--and, alas, on the
GR-1--at low EVs the built-in flash will activate by default unless your
fingernail can press a tiny button two or three times to tell the flash,
No thanks. Your preference to deactivate the autoflash is not remembered
from roll to roll, nor from frame to frame.

The Contax T3, like the T2 and the Tvs III zoom, offers autofocus or zone
focus only.

The original Contax T*, on the other hand (1985 to 1991?), is a
manual-focus metal jewel that capably fits all of Shel's criteria except
price. It sells used for $375 to $450, more for black. The T*'s flash slips
onto the side, adding no height or depth; just length, which actually
improves the grip. I believe the T*'s Zeiss Sonnar lens was the first of
three compact-camera lenses that Modern or Popular Photography found to be
the equal of the Rollei Sonnar. The same accolade was later bestowed on the
Ricoh GR1 and Rollei's own QZ35. The Minox coming darn close in the 70s and
was improved once or twice in the nineties.

The Rollei QZ35s are an engineering marvel that failed spectacularly in the
marketplace, plunging their $1800 street price to $850 in about a year.
They are considerably larger and heavier than Shel wants.

Minolta's TC-1, the smallest full-frame 35 ever made, is the only
manual-focus camera in Dan's group. It is a mini-marvel scale focuser.
Heads probably rolled at Minox for taking a back seat in the
how-do-they-do-it department. One of the TC-1's best attributes, besides
its 1/750th-second shutter (correct?) and tiny size: It looks like a toy!
No one will suspect that its owner is Shel Belinkoff, black-and-white
streetshooter extraordinaire. Unfortunately, used TC-1s are scarce and cost
upward of $450.

Finally, regarding most of the contemporary offerings: Could Shel really be
content with autofocus? On an AF SLR, at least, you can see what you're
focusing on. With a non-SLR, you never know for sure.

The only autofocus compacts that I can see Shel being ecstatic with are the
Nikon 35 Ti (35/2.8) and 28 Ti (28/2.8), and the Konica Hexar (35/2),
preferably the original model with the silent winder and rewinder. The
Nikons have three cool analog dials on the top panel to show you exposure
information and more. But all are about twice Shel's target weight and
three times his target price.

Personally, I'd take a Minox 35 GT-E. For Shel, the consummate thinking
street photographer, my recommendation remains the quirky but awesome
Rollei 35S or 35 SE.


Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject:

Hi Shel,

Paul covered the original compacts very thoroughly. If you are looking for
something of more recent vintage you might want to check out some of these
(all feature exp. compensation, many have adj. diopters, spot metering, and
metal bodies):

Ricoh GR1s, 28mm (Camera Traders Ltd. has lowest US $, BH has specs)

Canon Sure Shot Classic 120 Zoom, 38-120mm

Contax T3, 35mm Zeiss Sonnar T*
Contax Tvs III, 30-60mm Zeiss T* Vario Sonnar

Fuji DL Super Mini Zoom, 28-56mm

Konica LEXIO-70 Zoom, 28-70mm

Leica C1 Zoom, 38-105mm Vario-Elmar
Leica Minilux, 40mm Summarit
Leica Minilux Zoom, 35-70mm Vario-Elmar
Leica Z2X Zoom, 35-70mm Vario-Elmar

Minolta TC-1, 28mm

Rollei Prego 115 Zoom, 38-115mm
Rollei QZ35(all versions)

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Rob Studdert

On 23 May 2001, at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The highly regarded 28mm, f/2.8 Ricoh GR1, like the 28/3.5 Olympus XA-4 of
 the 1980s, offers full-program exposure only--no program shift. Even if it
 allows exposure compensation, you're at the mercy of the program that Ricoh has
 built into the exposure curve. You have no knowledge of, or control over, the
 shutter speed or aperture being used.

The GR1 has a well positioned compensation dial, I am not sure if there is a 
meter display but has a bad reputation for shutter lag AFAIK.

Cheers,

Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff

Autofocus is a no-no.  Zoom lenses are a no-no. Not being able to
set my own exposure is a no-no.  While a meter might be nice, I'd
have to be able to control it completely, including turning it off
and still being able to set exposure, otherwise a meter will only
get in the way.  Thanks for putting together that list though.
-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... there is no point in pressing the shutter 
unless you are making some caustic comment 
on the incongruities of life - Phillip Jones Griffiths

Dan Scott wrote:
 
 Forgot to mention, all of these do violate your no autofocus, but a few
 offer both.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 You might want to do as I did: Spend a couple weekends as follows:

Hi Paul ...

Ive downloaded everything that was of interest on Gandy's site. 
Thanks for all the other pointers.

 The Leica CL, Minolta CLE, and Contax G are not pocketable. Shel already
 has a great interchangeable-lens rangefinder (Leica M3); he is looking now
 for a fixed-lens compact. 

I've recently had the good fortune to get an M2 as well.  BTW, both
cameras will fit in my jeans' pocket with the 35mm Summicron, and
will also fit into several shirt pockets (I look for shirts with big
pockets).  On that basis the CL and CLE are definitely pocketable,
but, really, I'm looking for something smaller and cheaper.

Thus far, it seems that the Canon GIII and the Olympus 35RD are the
cameras that will be hard to beat.  I already know how the canon
fits and works for my needs and preferences, and the RD seems like
it may work well too.  I may end up staying with something of their
size ... but the search continues.
 
 As I did for Pentax lenses, I've been building a huge table of specs,
 ratings, and comments on cameras such as these. It's on 11x17 paper in
 FrameMaker, but if you'd like I can PDF it and send you the PDF to read
 onscreen or to print (if you can find a tabloid-size printer.

Please PDF it ands send it to me - if it's not too much trouble. 
Thanks!

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... there is no point in pressing the shutter 
unless you are making some caustic comment 
on the incongruities of life - Phillip Jones Griffiths
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Pocketable Camera

2001-05-22 Thread William Robb


- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 22, 2001 5:29 PM
Subject: Pocketable Camera


 I'm looking for a small, pocketable, full-frame 35mm camera,
perhaps
 a bit smaller than the Canon GIII.  Requirements are:

 Minimal features (built-in meter that can be overridden would
be
 nice)
 Quiet, unobtrusive operation
 Minimum shutter lag - prefer focal plane shutter w/up to
1/1000
 No pop-up flash, red-eye reduction, etc.
 Good build quality
 No autofocus

 Any suggestions?

Contax G2
William Robb


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .