Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-12 Thread Lon Williamson
I'd bet the Pentax 100/3.5 macro is the best of the Cosina
rebadges for Kmount because:
a) it focuses the right way
b) it has SMC.

We have three Phoenix 100mm/f3.5 macros in the household
They're sharp, but they focus the wrong way, and flare
is noticable in the viewfinder.  Their only advantage
over the Pentax is an included 2-element diopter that makes
the lens go to life-size.

My M 100mm f4 Macro beats the pants off the Phoenix, btw,
and costs about the same.  So I switched the diopter; I carry
it with the M.  Ain't I a dandy?

-Lon

T Rittenhouse wrote:
 
 Which brings up a point.
 
 Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
 badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
 or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line pro lenses which I would
 assume are at least designed in-house, can you be certain your high-priced
 camera brand lens is any better than the low priced off brand, or even any
 different.
 
 I find it amusing that folks will swear up and down that the brand they own
 is lots better than some other brand when they are actually the same lens.
 
 Out sourcing is a reality of our time whether it is cars, or cameras, or
 TVs, or what-not.
 
 Ciao,
 Graywolf
 http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:19 AM
 Subject: Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?
 
  on 07.12.02 17:38, Joseph Tainter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
   of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
   Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
   which are specifically not available in Pentax mount.
  All current lenses made by Sigma are available in KAF mount. I think these
  new products will be available sooner or later too. And if you look more
  carefully on the new  Tamron lenses (17-35/2.8-4, macro 180/3.5 ,
  70-200/2.8) it is obvious that these are OEM's made by Sigma! All of them
  are of course available in KAF-mount!
 
  --
  Best Regards
  Sylwek
 
 
 




Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-11 Thread mike wilson
Hi,

Alek wrote:
 How do you assess SP 500/8 Tamron?

Sharp optics, easy to use hand-held (with resultant degradation
of performance) small and light for the optical reach, cheap
secondhand.  IIRC, focuses oppositely to Pentax lenses.

Very easy to dismantle and clean when filled with river water
8-)  (I think I just lowered my chances of selling mine)

Drawbacks?  Not with the lens per se. but quite a few people
have had problems with mounts.  Make sure the one you get is
secure and functions as required.

 mike




Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-10 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 07.12.02 17:38, Joseph Tainter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
 of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
 Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
 which are specifically not available in Pentax mount.
All current lenses made by Sigma are available in KAF mount. I think these
new products will be available sooner or later too. And if you look more
carefully on the new  Tamron lenses (17-35/2.8-4, macro 180/3.5 ,
70-200/2.8) it is obvious that these are OEM's made by Sigma! All of them
are of course available in KAF-mount!

-- 
Best Regards
Sylwek






RE: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-10 Thread Rob Brigham
You know, I had not even noticed these new products.  I just looked on
photozone and you are right - they do look very similar to Sigma
versions.  And the 200-500 looks very much like a sigma, although they
don't make one in this range I think.

This would be fascinating if Sigma and Tamron have tied up!

Will Tamron start making lenses in Sigma mount too?  This would push
Tokina and others to support the mount too, and that is what Sigma needs
to give credibility to their body OEM status IMO.

 -Original Message-
 From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 And if you look more carefully on the new  Tamron lenses 
 (17-35/2.8-4, macro 180/3.5 ,
 70-200/2.8) it is obvious that these are OEM's made by Sigma! 
 All of them are of course available in KAF-mount!
 




Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-10 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 10.12.02 12:32, Rob Brigham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You know, I had not even noticed these new products.  I just looked on
 photozone and you are right - they do look very similar to Sigma
 versions.  And the 200-500 looks very much like a sigma, although they
 don't make one in this range I think.
Tamron SP lenses (except for 90 macro) were never popular. That probably
pushed them to buy ready designs from Sigma.

 This would be fascinating if Sigma and Tamron have tied up!
 
 Will Tamron start making lenses in Sigma mount too?  This would push
 Tokina and others to support the mount too, and that is what Sigma needs
 to give credibility to their body OEM status IMO.
Who knows? We have seen so many strange turning points in history of
photography, that it could be easily possible!

-- 
Best Regards
Sylwek






Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-10 Thread T Rittenhouse
Which brings up a point.

Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line pro lenses which I would
assume are at least designed in-house, can you be certain your high-priced
camera brand lens is any better than the low priced off brand, or even any
different.

I find it amusing that folks will swear up and down that the brand they own
is lots better than some other brand when they are actually the same lens.

Out sourcing is a reality of our time whether it is cars, or cameras, or
TVs, or what-not.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?


 on 07.12.02 17:38, Joseph Tainter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
  of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
  Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
  which are specifically not available in Pentax mount.
 All current lenses made by Sigma are available in KAF mount. I think these
 new products will be available sooner or later too. And if you look more
 carefully on the new  Tamron lenses (17-35/2.8-4, macro 180/3.5 ,
 70-200/2.8) it is obvious that these are OEM's made by Sigma! All of them
 are of course available in KAF-mount!

 --
 Best Regards
 Sylwek







Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-10 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 10.12.02 13:42, T Rittenhouse at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
 badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
 or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line pro lenses which I would
 assume are at least designed in-house, can you be certain your high-priced
 camera brand lens is any better than the low priced off brand, or even any
 different.
 
 I find it amusing that folks will swear up and down that the brand they own
 is lots better than some other brand when they are actually the same lens.
 
Exactly - many low-cost lenses for are made outside main compqany. Only
better models in the range are house-made. Pentax is no exception here -
Nikon 70-300/4-5.6 ED is nothing less or more but just Tamron LD...

-- 
Best Regards
Sylwek






Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-10 Thread Fred
 Tamron SP lenses (except for 90 macro) were never popular.

I think that the SP 500/8 mirror has sold fairly well (they show up
on eBay fairly often, anyway), and ~it~ (as the same lens design, I
believe, although I am not certain of that) has been in the Tamron
lineup for a long time.  It has gotten good reviews, and its 1:2.5
almost-macro focusing is a real plus (1:1.25 with the SP 2X TC,
too).

I have four mirrors right now, the Tamron SP 500/8, the VS1 600/8
Solid Cat, the VS1 450/4.5 Aspheric, and the SMC K 1000/11, and
they're all quite good (for mirror lenses), but they are all quite
different from each other, too.

Fred





Re: Sigma/Tamron vote no confidence in Pentax?

2002-12-07 Thread Pål Jensen
Joseph wrote:


 I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
 of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
 Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
 which are specifically not available in Pentax mount.


Well, personally it's not a great loss as I have never had even the slightest wish to 
use a Sigma or a Tamron lens. 
With Pentax current market share it hardly surprising that not all lenses are 
available in Pentax mount.

Pål