Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-06 Thread Bryan Jacoby
That lens has been back on BH for almost two years now (that I've
been aware of it) so I don't think it's proof of full frame.  The last
time I checked the price was $475, though.

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:48 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 Look what shows up as a current product at BH

 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html

 I thought this lens was discontinued years ago.

 --
 Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds
 in the bank account).


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-06 Thread P. J. Alling
It hasn't been listed on the http://www.pentaximaging.com web site for 
any of that time.  It was officially discontinued at BH three years ago 
and by Pentax at the same time.  I don't think it's been there all that 
time, I kept haunting there hoping to find one.


On 2/6/2013 2:47 PM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:

That lens has been back on BH for almost two years now (that I've
been aware of it) so I don't think it's proof of full frame.  The last
time I checked the price was $475, though.

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:48 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:

Look what shows up as a current product at BH

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html

I thought this lens was discontinued years ago.

--
Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds
in the bank account).


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds in 
the bank account).


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-05 Thread Tom C
 They could press a K-Mount onto a wet turd, stick a full frame sensor
 into the other end and I'd buy the thing and pretend that my shit
 doesn't stink.
 The main problem with Pentax's loyal customer base is that they got
 involved with Pentax because they were the budget brand. Note how every
 time a new model is released, the number of people who say they will
 wait until the price comes down outnumbers the people who actually buy
 the thing out of the gate.

 bill

I'll let Pentax know. They could significantly increase their profit
margin with this approach. Must the wet turd be weather-sealed and
have shake-reduction? :)

Tom C.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-05 Thread P. J. Alling

On 2/3/2013 9:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Rob Studdert wrote:


On 4 February 2013 12:23, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:


I've always said that all those people complaining about the lack of a
FF Pentax would NEVER BUY IT if it were announced because it would
cost ~$2,500, which Pentax cheapskates would find too high.

Happy to be proven wrong, of course.

So long as it's better spec'd than a D600 otherwise it would be a bit rich.

I'm thinking D600 spec but with the benefit of in-body image
stabilization.

I picked up a new client a couple of months ago. The first check from
that client was put aside for the purpose of full-frame purchase.

  

I hope you've put it in an inflation proof investment.

--
Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds in 
the bank account).


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after, all...

2013-02-05 Thread P. J. Alling
When I first bought into Pentax it mas a middle of the road camera 
manufacture that built rock solid hard to kill cameras. My original 
Spotmatic took a 3 foot drop onto concrete and after having the meter re 
calibrated took photos just as well as it had before, (but with a huge 
dent in it's prism housing). It did not survive the later fall off the 
50 foot cliff to the jagged rocks below unfortunately, but that's 
another story.


When I got tired of trying to swap screw mount lenses fast, (possible 
but usually problematic), I looked at a lot of different camera systems, 
and really was leaning towards either Nikon in the form of a nice 
Nikkormat FTn, (which I had used at a couple of Newspapers), Olympus 
with the tiny jewel like, OM1, or a Pentax KX. Anyway you looked at it I 
was going to have to buy all new lenses, Not a huge problem as I only 
had a 35mm f2.8 a 55mm f1.8 and a 150mm f4, which I[d gotten a fantastic 
deal on at some point. I really did like the 150mm aov.


I had pretty much decided on an OM1, (and a Zuiko 70-150 zoom to keep 
the kit small), when Pentax announced the new M series cameras, and the 
MX which was pretty much the same price as the OM1 with a full 
information viewfinder, and Vivitar had just announced a 70-150mm Zoom 
that was just a little faster than the Zuiko, and was reputed to be the 
same Optical formula as the Legendary 70-210 Series 1.


So I ended up with Pentax yet again. Not because it was less expensive 
but because of it's superior features at roughly the same price.


On 2/4/2013 12:00 PM, John Sessoms wrote:

From: Paul Stenquist


That's fine if it has $2500 worth of content. But I certainly won't
complain if it compares favorably to cameras costing more.


That's what brought me to Pentax to begin with, compares favorably to 
cameras costing more. I think they need to continue to do that.





--
Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds in 
the bank account).


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-05 Thread Bill

On 05/02/2013 1:45 PM, Tom C wrote:

They could press a K-Mount onto a wet turd, stick a full frame sensor
into the other end and I'd buy the thing and pretend that my shit
doesn't stink.
The main problem with Pentax's loyal customer base is that they got
involved with Pentax because they were the budget brand. Note how every
time a new model is released, the number of people who say they will
wait until the price comes down outnumbers the people who actually buy
the thing out of the gate.

bill

I'll let Pentax know. They could significantly increase their profit
margin with this approach. Must the wet turd be weather-sealed and
have shake-reduction? :)

Tom C.


It doesn't even have to be wet.

bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after, all...

2013-02-04 Thread John Sessoms

From: Paul Stenquist


That's fine if it has $2500 worth of content. But I certainly won't
complain if it compares favorably to cameras costing more.


That's what brought me to Pentax to begin with, compares favorably to 
cameras costing more. I think they need to continue to do that.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 2/2/13, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:

Look what shows up as a current product at BH

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/
Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html

And the perfect accompaniment...

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/675922-REG/
Yamaha_RHH135_RHH_135_Hi_Hat_Cymbal.html


-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Producion
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu
Funny :)
By the way, apparently Pentax Japan confirmed the FF, in a
not-yet-released Pentaxforums interview. Since last year they started
talking about FF (as in: we're developing it, marketing must think
about a profitable solution).
I hope a certain event involving a hat would be properly documented;
fortunately, there is plenty of time to find the proper seasoning.

Regards,
Alex

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
 On 2/2/13, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:

Look what shows up as a current product at BH

 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/
 Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html

 And the perfect accompaniment...

 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/675922-REG/
 Yamaha_RHH135_RHH_135_Hi_Hat_Cymbal.html


 --


 Cheers,
   Cotty

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Larry Colen

On Feb 2, 2013, at 8:48 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

 Look what shows up as a current product at BH
 
 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html
 
 I thought this lens was discontinued years ago.

Interesting to see, along with this:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/214117-pentax-confirms-full-frame-cp-inteview-pentax-forums.html

 

--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Rob Studdert
On 3 February 2013 22:48, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:

 Interesting to see, along with this:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/214117-pentax-confirms-full-frame-cp-inteview-pentax-forums.html

Interesting but I'll believe it when I see it (with my A16/2.8 fisheye
giving me 180 degrees DAOV :)

-- 
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Paul Stenquist
A full frame camera may be coming, but this is no evidence. BH has offered the 
35/2 off and on for years. They probably have a stockpile of them.

Paul
On Feb 2, 2013, at 11:48 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:

 Look what shows up as a current product at BH
 
 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html
 
 I thought this lens was discontinued years ago.
 
 -- 
 Buy a Leica to get the full “Leica Experience”, (a quick reduction of funds 
 in the bank account).
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Bill

On 03/02/2013 6:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

A full frame camera may be coming, but this is no evidence.
Quite true. The Pentax interview mentioned that one would be released in 
2013 or later. The or later is the important part. The funny thin is. 
I suspect a full framer from Pentax would be instantly profitable, given 
the amount of angst riddled posts we see on various forums and the like.
Either that, or people would wait to buy it until the price point was 
such that Pentax would lose money on it (probably more likely given the 
user base).


William Robb

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Bob Sullivan
Oh come on Bill, I'm sure the Saskatchewan Profit Center would make
still make money.
They have a small but loyal customer base.  :-)
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 03/02/2013 6:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

 A full frame camera may be coming, but this is no evidence.

 Quite true. The Pentax interview mentioned that one would be released in
 2013 or later. The or later is the important part. The funny thin is. I
 suspect a full framer from Pentax would be instantly profitable, given the
 amount of angst riddled posts we see on various forums and the like.
 Either that, or people would wait to buy it until the price point was such
 that Pentax would lose money on it (probably more likely given the user
 base).

 William Robb


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread John Sessoms

From: P. J. Alling


Look what shows up as a current product at BH

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/180121-USA/Pentax_22190_Wide_Angle_35mm_f_2_0.html

I thought this lens was discontinued years ago.


Maybe someone from Ricoh was doing some housecleaning and found a bunch 
of them in the back of some forgotten Pentax warehouse.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Bill

On 03/02/2013 12:03 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

Oh come on Bill, I'm sure the Saskatchewan Profit Center would make
still make money.
They have a small but loyal customer base.  :-)
Regards,  Bob S.

They could press a K-Mount onto a wet turd, stick a full frame sensor 
into the other end and I'd buy the thing and pretend that my shit 
doesn't stink.
The main problem with Pentax's loyal customer base is that they got 
involved with Pentax because they were the budget brand. Note how every 
time a new model is released, the number of people who say they will 
wait until the price comes down outnumbers the people who actually buy 
the thing out of the gate.


bill

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Mark Roberts
Bill wrote:

The main problem with Pentax's loyal customer base is that they got 
involved with Pentax because they were the budget brand. Note how every 
time a new model is released, the number of people who say they will 
wait until the price comes down outnumbers the people who actually buy 
the thing out of the gate.

There's a lot of truth in that. I remember being the only one who was
disappointed that the price of the K10-D was too *low* when it was
introduced; I wanted something priced near (and competitive with) the
cameras in the $2000 range at that time. Mind you, I think (hope) the
success of the 645D has given Pentax the courage to make the
full-frame camera in the $2000-2500 range when it appears.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Paul Stenquist
That's fine if ithas $2500 worth of content. But I certainly won't complain if 
it compares favorably to cameras costing more.

Paul via phone

On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:

 Bill wrote:
 
 The main problem with Pentax's loyal customer base is that they got 
 involved with Pentax because they were the budget brand. Note how every 
 time a new model is released, the number of people who say they will 
 wait until the price comes down outnumbers the people who actually buy 
 the thing out of the gate.
 
 There's a lot of truth in that. I remember being the only one who was
 disappointed that the price of the K10-D was too *low* when it was
 introduced; I wanted something priced near (and competitive with) the
 cameras in the $2000 range at that time. Mind you, I think (hope) the
 success of the 645D has given Pentax the courage to make the
 full-frame camera in the $2000-2500 range when it appears.
 
 -- 
 Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
 www.robertstech.com
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Christine Aguila

On Feb 3, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:

 
 Interesting to see, along with this:
 http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/214117-pentax-confirms-full-frame-cp-inteview-pentax-forums.html


Oh, Pentax, quit fretting and just do it.  Cheers, Christine
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Miserere
Well, when I bought my K10D in 2007 it was because I got it for the
same price as the Canon Digital Rebel of the day. It was like
comparing apples and oranges (if fruits could take photographs). The
K10D out-spec'd the Digital Rebel every which way, and thus my fate
was sealed.

I've always said that all those people complaining about the lack of a
FF Pentax would NEVER BUY IT if it were announced because it would
cost ~$2,500, which Pentax cheapskates would find too high.

Happy to be proven wrong, of course.


   —M.

\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com

http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment



On 3 February 2013 14:48, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
 Bill wrote:

The main problem with Pentax's loyal customer base is that they got
involved with Pentax because they were the budget brand. Note how every
time a new model is released, the number of people who say they will
wait until the price comes down outnumbers the people who actually buy
the thing out of the gate.

 There's a lot of truth in that. I remember being the only one who was
 disappointed that the price of the K10-D was too *low* when it was
 introduced; I wanted something priced near (and competitive with) the
 cameras in the $2000 range at that time. Mind you, I think (hope) the
 success of the 645D has given Pentax the courage to make the
 full-frame camera in the $2000-2500 range when it appears.

 --
 Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
 www.robertstech.com





 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Rob Studdert
On 4 February 2013 12:23, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've always said that all those people complaining about the lack of a
 FF Pentax would NEVER BUY IT if it were announced because it would
 cost ~$2,500, which Pentax cheapskates would find too high.

 Happy to be proven wrong, of course.

So long as it's better spec'd than a D600 otherwise it would be a bit rich.

--
Rob Studdert (Digital  Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Perhaps the rumors of a Pentax FF cameras are true after all...

2013-02-03 Thread Mark Roberts
Rob Studdert wrote:

On 4 February 2013 12:23, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've always said that all those people complaining about the lack of a
 FF Pentax would NEVER BUY IT if it were announced because it would
 cost ~$2,500, which Pentax cheapskates would find too high.

 Happy to be proven wrong, of course.

So long as it's better spec'd than a D600 otherwise it would be a bit rich.

I'm thinking D600 spec but with the benefit of in-body image
stabilization. 

I picked up a new client a couple of months ago. The first check from
that client was put aside for the purpose of full-frame purchase. 

 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography  Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.