Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-17 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 16/6/14, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:


 https://www.ifixit.com/Store/Tools/54-Bit-Driver-Kit/IF145-022
 

I was *just* telling the wife that I need to replace my craptastic mini-
driver set with something higher-quality.

Would be very interested to see what you think when they arrive.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-17 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jun 16, 2014, at 21:00 , Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
 
 I'm glad you got it done without issue. For me, I didn't get past step three. 
 Removing the fan connector … gently as I could imagine … ripped the connector 
 socket block right off the motherboard. From how the folks at the store 
 reacted, I think this is not uncommon. It's a very delicate little component. 
 

I've damaged connectors like this before when attempting to bring trashed 
digital cameras back to life.  I've been there.  Maybe I got lucky with that 
connector this time (shudder). Hopefully I'll never have to go back in 
there!

Agree with the external TimeMachine drive... even if it makes the desktop a 
little less neat.

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-17 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jun 17, 2014, at 04:44 , Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:

 On 16/6/14, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
 
 
 https://www.ifixit.com/Store/Tools/54-Bit-Driver-Kit/IF145-022
 
 
 I was *just* telling the wife that I need to replace my craptastic mini-
 driver set with something higher-quality.
 
 Would be very interested to see what you think when they arrive.
 

I have to decide between the driver set or the $65 entire tool-roll... I will 
report back when one or the other arrives at home!

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-17 Thread John

Yeah, at this point, I don't have need of a second drive in there
either. My only point is having to go into the machine twice is twice
the opportunity to screw it up.

I just figure having someone else clean up my mess will cost me less if
I combine all of my mistakes into one operation.

On 6/16/2014 10:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

ifixit.com is great. I've used them a lot.

As I wrote to Charles, I didn't see the point of putting another
drive into the machine in the end and revised my original plan.
Plenty of disk space free and all my photo data is on external drives
anyway, both for safety and for best performance.

Yes, doing RAM is a no brainer. But I already have the mini maxed out
with 16G RAM; bought it that way.

G

On Jun 16, 2014, at 11:06 AM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:


The day I got a Mac mini I started looking at upgrade options. I
found a place called ifixit.com that has a lot of guides 
tutorials.

Replacing the hard-drive on the Mac mini looks to be a real bear.
If I was going to attempt it, I'd want to go ahead and add the
second drive at the same time so I didn't have to go in there
twice.

Adding RAM doesn't appear to be too much of a challenge though.





--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-16 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 15/6/14, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:

However, they would not install a non-Apple certified part like the SSD.
Rather than risk breaking the logic board a second time, I used an
external enclosure to format and clone my configured system and all data
to the SSD, tested by booting it up from the external enclosure, and
then paid a good independent shop that I've done lots of business with
before to do the drive installation (We Fix Macs in Palo Alto, CA). They
did a terrific job, turning it around in a couple of hours yesterday. 

Thanks for the report - very interesting! Totally concur re the SSD.
Ever since I installed them - first in Stefan's 2008 13 inch MB - and
later in my 2011 15 inch MBP - performance has rocketed. As you know I'm
a heavy user, especially recently with video editing, and neither drive
has skipped a beat. Both are Samsung 250MB units. Next year I'll be
upgrading to 1 TB units for sure.

Recently, Stef's iPhone 4S top mic ceased working. The usual suspect of
crud inside proved not to be the cause and after much cleaning and
reassembling there was nothing for it but to get a new one. It comes on
a ribbon cable with the volume buttons and 3.5mm jack amongst others and
was a total stripdown job. The iFixit videos and slide shows of the
process are brilliant. I have a pair of magnifying lenses on a head
brace I wear for anything like this and thoroughly recommend them for
anything like this.

My jeweller's screwdriver kit was getting a bit long in the tooth and
home-made spudgers and probes all a bit tired, so I also got one of
these, which is BRILLIANT. To anyone who's still looking to settle with
a high quality tool kit with ALL the goodies you'll ever need, that
won't break the bank, this is it.

The iFixit 54 piece driver set:

https://www.ifixit.com/Store/Tools/54-Bit-Driver-Kit/IF145-022

UK:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/iFixit-Bit-Driver-Screwdriver-Toolset/dp/B00D2CRZ2E

Amazing kit, great quality. The driver is lightweight aluminium and
holds the bits via magnetic female bay. Nice touches like the rubber
grips on the outside and rotating palm grip. Great range of tools, all
types covered including security bits.

For the money you can't get better.



-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-16 Thread Charles Robinson
On Jun 16, 2014, at 04:28 , Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
 
 My jeweller's screwdriver kit was getting a bit long in the tooth and
 home-made spudgers and probes all a bit tired, so I also got one of
 these, which is BRILLIANT. To anyone who's still looking to settle with
 a high quality tool kit with ALL the goodies you'll ever need, that
 won't break the bank, this is it.
 
 The iFixit 54 piece driver set:
 
 https://www.ifixit.com/Store/Tools/54-Bit-Driver-Kit/IF145-022
 

I was *just* telling the wife that I need to replace my craptastic mini-driver 
set with something higher-quality.

Now I know what to do, thanks!

As for drive installation in a Mini - I just swapped a 1TB drive into my 
mid-2011 Mini (replacing the original 500GB) and I didn't have to move the 
logic board at all.  The instructions SAY you should use the logic-board 
removal tool to shift it out of the way a bit, but my experience was that that 
particular step of the process wasn't necessary at all - the drive slid into 
place just fine with the logic board fully installed.

However, if I ever want to stack up a second drive in the mini, then the board 
would have to move.   That will be a while yet.

 -Charles

--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-16 Thread John

The day I got a Mac mini I started looking at upgrade options. I found a
place called ifixit.com that has a lot of guides  tutorials.

Replacing the hard-drive on the Mac mini looks to be a real bear. If I
was going to attempt it, I'd want to go ahead and add the second drive
at the same time so I didn't have to go in there twice.

Adding RAM doesn't appear to be too much of a challenge though.

On 6/15/2014 7:24 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote:

Thank you for the thorough discussion/review. This goes in my file
for the next time I work my way through system upgrade options.

stan

On Jun 15, 2014, at 6:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com
wrote:


Finally had time to install the Crucial 960G SSD that was my Xmas
gift last December into my Mac mini (late-2012 series, 2.6Ghz i7
Quad, with 16G RAM). The saga of the installation is a long and
somewhat costly bit of entertainment but would certainly go way
off-topic, but in the end I decided to stick with just one drive
internal to the mini. It's up and running since last evening so
I've had time to observe it through my usual range of operations.
The previous drive was the usual nice, solid 1T 5400rpm standard
drive that Apple offers for it, not bad on performance itself.

The SSD, however, transforms the mini:

- Boot time with Mavericks and my usual complement of stuff with
the 1T HD ran around 40-50 seconds, with some little bits like the
DropBox plugin taking up to 90 seconds to initialize. With the SSD,
everything is loaded and ready to run in less than 6 seconds from
cold start.

- My working catalog with Lightroom contains 89,000 raw, TIFF, and
JPEG image files (all originals stored on a external FW 800 drive,
catalog folder on the startup drive). With the 1T HD, Lightroom
startup ran about 45-50 seconds. Now, with the SSD, it take five
seconds from clicking on it in the dock to being ready for work.

- Moving from image to image in Develop module without 1:1 Previews
cached when working with Sony A7 24 Mpixel images would take about
4-5 seconds with the 1T HD. Now with the SSD, the load time is down
to less than a second - the loading notification just barely
flashes onto the screen.

- Loading a 131 Mbyte VueScan DNG file (scanned Polaroid photo)
into Photoshop CS5.1 from within LR used to take about 45-50
seconds with the 1T HD. It's down to 9 seconds with the SSD,
*including* the Photoshop startup time. If Photoshop is already
running, load time is about 3 seconds. Saving a full-resolution,
16bit TIFF from Photoshop of that same file takes less than a
second.

- ALL applications across the board on the system are now
substantially snappier in operation.

The drive I received last December is the Crucial 960GB M500 2.5
Internal SSD, currently available from BHPhoto for $450. I see
there's a newer model full 1T version now that is 20% faster on
writes for another $50. That's well worth the price for this kind
of performance improvement.

The boring part:

Installing a drive into the mini is not easy. To make the
four-day-long story very short, an attempt to do this myself (and
I'm not a total newbie to changing drives in computer systems,
laptops, etc …) was a failure that resulted in damage to the main
logic board. Luckily, my AppleCare is current and the local Apple
Retail Store covered a new logic board and installation as warranty
repair. (No, I didn't lie to them: I told them exactly how I broke
the fan coupling off the logic board. Their response was, Eh, it
happens. Let's get your machine back together for you.) They had
it all done and back to me in 48 hours.

However, they would not install a non-Apple certified part like the
SSD. Rather than risk breaking the logic board a second time, I
used an external enclosure to format and clone my configured system
and all data to the SSD, tested by booting it up from the external
enclosure, and then paid a good independent shop that I've done
lots of business with before to do the drive installation (We Fix
Macs in Palo Alto, CA). They did a terrific job, turning it around
in a couple of hours yesterday.

Computer systems to process and render photos are as much a part of
camera equipment as lenses and bodies these days, and at least as
important. Getting this big a performance boost out of a relatively
low cost, compact system like the Mac mini makes it much more
efficient and practical to do what I like to do best: work on and
produce photographs.

enjoy!

Godfrey --- The fact that nobody understands you doesn't make you
an artist.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-16 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Good looking set of tools, Cotty. I probably would have been successful doing 
the swap myself if I had decent tools. I used the ones that came with the 
two-drive adaptation kit, and that just didn't work. I've already sent it back 
for a refund. 

On Jun 16, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:

 As for drive installation in a Mini - I just swapped a 1TB drive into my 
 mid-2011 Mini (replacing the original 500GB) and I didn't have to move the 
 logic board at all.  The instructions SAY you should use the logic-board 
 removal tool to shift it out of the way a bit, but my experience was that 
 that particular step of the process wasn't necessary at all - the drive slid 
 into place just fine with the logic board fully installed.
 
 However, if I ever want to stack up a second drive in the mini, then the 
 board would have to move.   That will be a while yet.

I'm glad you got it done without issue. For me, I didn't get past step three. 
Removing the fan connector … gently as I could imagine … ripped the connector 
socket block right off the motherboard. From how the folks at the store 
reacted, I think this is not uncommon. It's a very delicate little component. 

Originally I was going to do the two drive setup and configure the SSD for boot 
and the second drive for Time Machine. But after the damage to the board, I 
thought to myself, Well, that's actually dumb, because if the TM backup is 
external, I can boot up another machine and recreate my entire system without 
having to dig out the drive if the mini craps out. I don't need more than the 
960G single in the mini since my data is all external and my whole system (OS, 
apps, three accounts, and all their data) leaves almost 500G free space on the 
boot drive, another reason why the speed up is so extreme. Nothing makes OS X 
happier than having LOTS of free space on the boot drive to manage temps, 
auto-file-system defragmentation, its built-in optimization routines, etc.  

I chose a little LaCie 1T ruggedized drive for the backup volume with 
Thunderbolt and USB3 interfaces. It rips and operates absolutely silently. 
  ;-)

G
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-16 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
ifixit.com is great. I've used them a lot. 

As I wrote to Charles, I didn't see the point of putting another drive into the 
machine in the end and revised my original plan. Plenty of disk space free and 
all my photo data is on external drives anyway, both for safety and for best 
performance.

Yes, doing RAM is a no brainer. But I already have the mini maxed out with 16G 
RAM; bought it that way. 

G

On Jun 16, 2014, at 11:06 AM, John sesso...@earthlink.net wrote:

 The day I got a Mac mini I started looking at upgrade options. I found a
 place called ifixit.com that has a lot of guides  tutorials.
 
 Replacing the hard-drive on the Mac mini looks to be a real bear. If I
 was going to attempt it, I'd want to go ahead and add the second drive
 at the same time so I didn't have to go in there twice.
 
 Adding RAM doesn't appear to be too much of a challenge though.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-16 Thread Bruce
Ok all this talk got me off my keister and down to Fry's.  My 5.2 mac mini main 
drive was down to 160gb so I picked up a Seagate 1tb sshd drive.  The swap has 
been done and my old drive is now being restored to the new one.  Only 4 more 
hours of waiting.  Hopefully the extra room and faster drive will give it a 
bump in responsiveness.   Thanks for posting. 

--
Bruce

Sent from my iPad

 On Jun 16, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
 
 Good looking set of tools, Cotty. I probably would have been successful doing 
 the swap myself if I had decent tools. I used the ones that came with the 
 two-drive adaptation kit, and that just didn't work. I've already sent it 
 back for a refund. 
 
 On Jun 16, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
 
 As for drive installation in a Mini - I just swapped a 1TB drive into my 
 mid-2011 Mini (replacing the original 500GB) and I didn't have to move the 
 logic board at all.  The instructions SAY you should use the logic-board 
 removal tool to shift it out of the way a bit, but my experience was that 
 that particular step of the process wasn't necessary at all - the drive slid 
 into place just fine with the logic board fully installed.
 
 However, if I ever want to stack up a second drive in the mini, then the 
 board would have to move.   That will be a while yet.
 
 I'm glad you got it done without issue. For me, I didn't get past step three. 
 Removing the fan connector … gently as I could imagine … ripped the connector 
 socket block right off the motherboard. From how the folks at the store 
 reacted, I think this is not uncommon. It's a very delicate little component. 
 
 Originally I was going to do the two drive setup and configure the SSD for 
 boot and the second drive for Time Machine. But after the damage to the 
 board, I thought to myself, Well, that's actually dumb, because if the TM 
 backup is external, I can boot up another machine and recreate my entire 
 system without having to dig out the drive if the mini craps out. I don't 
 need more than the 960G single in the mini since my data is all external and 
 my whole system (OS, apps, three accounts, and all their data) leaves almost 
 500G free space on the boot drive, another reason why the speed up is so 
 extreme. Nothing makes OS X happier than having LOTS of free space on the 
 boot drive to manage temps, auto-file-system defragmentation, its built-in 
 optimization routines, etc.  
 
 I chose a little LaCie 1T ruggedized drive for the backup volume with 
 Thunderbolt and USB3 interfaces. It rips and operates absolutely silently. 
  ;-)
 
 G
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.
 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-15 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Finally had time to install the Crucial 960G SSD that was my Xmas gift last 
December into my Mac mini (late-2012 series, 2.6Ghz i7 Quad, with 16G RAM). The 
saga of the installation is a long and somewhat costly bit of entertainment but 
would certainly go way off-topic, but in the end I decided to stick with just 
one drive internal to the mini. It's up and running since last evening so I've 
had time to observe it through my usual range of operations. The previous drive 
was the usual nice, solid 1T 5400rpm standard drive that Apple offers for it, 
not bad on performance itself. 

The SSD, however, transforms the mini:

- Boot time with Mavericks and my usual complement of stuff with the 1T HD ran 
around 40-50 seconds, with some little bits like the DropBox plugin taking up 
to 90 seconds to initialize. With the SSD, everything is loaded and ready to 
run in less than 6 seconds from cold start. 

- My working catalog with Lightroom contains 89,000 raw, TIFF, and JPEG image 
files (all originals stored on a external FW 800 drive, catalog folder on the 
startup drive). With the 1T HD, Lightroom startup ran about 45-50 seconds. Now, 
with the SSD, it take five seconds from clicking on it in the dock to being 
ready for work. 

- Moving from image to image in Develop module without 1:1 Previews cached when 
working with Sony A7 24 Mpixel images would take about 4-5 seconds with the 1T 
HD. Now with the SSD, the load time is down to less than a second - the loading 
notification just barely flashes onto the screen. 

- Loading a 131 Mbyte VueScan DNG file (scanned Polaroid photo) into Photoshop 
CS5.1 from within LR used to take about 45-50 seconds with the 1T HD. It's down 
to 9 seconds with the SSD, *including* the Photoshop startup time. If Photoshop 
is already running, load time is about 3 seconds. Saving a full-resolution, 
16bit TIFF from Photoshop of that same file takes less than a second.

- ALL applications across the board on the system are now substantially 
snappier in operation. 

The drive I received last December is the Crucial 960GB M500 2.5 Internal 
SSD, currently available from BHPhoto for $450. I see there's a newer model 
full 1T version now that is 20% faster on writes for another $50. That's well 
worth the price for this kind of performance improvement. 

The boring part:

Installing a drive into the mini is not easy. To make the four-day-long story 
very short, an attempt to do this myself (and I'm not a total newbie to 
changing drives in computer systems, laptops, etc …) was a failure that 
resulted in damage to the main logic board. Luckily, my AppleCare is current 
and the local Apple Retail Store covered a new logic board and installation as 
warranty repair. (No, I didn't lie to them: I told them exactly how I broke the 
fan coupling off the logic board. Their response was, Eh, it happens. Let's 
get your machine back together for you.) They had it all done and back to me 
in 48 hours. 

However, they would not install a non-Apple certified part like the SSD. Rather 
than risk breaking the logic board a second time, I used an external enclosure 
to format and clone my configured system and all data to the SSD, tested by 
booting it up from the external enclosure, and then paid a good independent 
shop that I've done lots of business with before to do the drive installation 
(We Fix Macs in Palo Alto, CA). They did a terrific job, turning it around in a 
couple of hours yesterday. 

Computer systems to process and render photos are as much a part of camera 
equipment as lenses and bodies these days, and at least as important. Getting 
this big a performance boost out of a relatively low cost, compact system like 
the Mac mini makes it much more efficient and practical to do what I like to do 
best: work on and produce photographs. 

enjoy!

Godfrey
---
  The fact that nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-15 Thread Stanley Halpin
Thank you for the thorough discussion/review. This goes in my file for the next 
time I work my way through system upgrade options.

stan

On Jun 15, 2014, at 6:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:

 Finally had time to install the Crucial 960G SSD that was my Xmas gift last 
 December into my Mac mini (late-2012 series, 2.6Ghz i7 Quad, with 16G RAM). 
 The saga of the installation is a long and somewhat costly bit of 
 entertainment but would certainly go way off-topic, but in the end I decided 
 to stick with just one drive internal to the mini. It's up and running since 
 last evening so I've had time to observe it through my usual range of 
 operations. The previous drive was the usual nice, solid 1T 5400rpm standard 
 drive that Apple offers for it, not bad on performance itself. 
 
 The SSD, however, transforms the mini:
 
 - Boot time with Mavericks and my usual complement of stuff with the 1T HD 
 ran around 40-50 seconds, with some little bits like the DropBox plugin 
 taking up to 90 seconds to initialize. With the SSD, everything is loaded and 
 ready to run in less than 6 seconds from cold start. 
 
 - My working catalog with Lightroom contains 89,000 raw, TIFF, and JPEG image 
 files (all originals stored on a external FW 800 drive, catalog folder on the 
 startup drive). With the 1T HD, Lightroom startup ran about 45-50 seconds. 
 Now, with the SSD, it take five seconds from clicking on it in the dock to 
 being ready for work. 
 
 - Moving from image to image in Develop module without 1:1 Previews cached 
 when working with Sony A7 24 Mpixel images would take about 4-5 seconds with 
 the 1T HD. Now with the SSD, the load time is down to less than a second - 
 the loading notification just barely flashes onto the screen. 
 
 - Loading a 131 Mbyte VueScan DNG file (scanned Polaroid photo) into 
 Photoshop CS5.1 from within LR used to take about 45-50 seconds with the 1T 
 HD. It's down to 9 seconds with the SSD, *including* the Photoshop startup 
 time. If Photoshop is already running, load time is about 3 seconds. Saving a 
 full-resolution, 16bit TIFF from Photoshop of that same file takes less than 
 a second.
 
 - ALL applications across the board on the system are now substantially 
 snappier in operation. 
 
 The drive I received last December is the Crucial 960GB M500 2.5 Internal 
 SSD, currently available from BHPhoto for $450. I see there's a newer model 
 full 1T version now that is 20% faster on writes for another $50. That's well 
 worth the price for this kind of performance improvement. 
 
 The boring part:
 
 Installing a drive into the mini is not easy. To make the four-day-long story 
 very short, an attempt to do this myself (and I'm not a total newbie to 
 changing drives in computer systems, laptops, etc …) was a failure that 
 resulted in damage to the main logic board. Luckily, my AppleCare is current 
 and the local Apple Retail Store covered a new logic board and installation 
 as warranty repair. (No, I didn't lie to them: I told them exactly how I 
 broke the fan coupling off the logic board. Their response was, Eh, it 
 happens. Let's get your machine back together for you.) They had it all done 
 and back to me in 48 hours. 
 
 However, they would not install a non-Apple certified part like the SSD. 
 Rather than risk breaking the logic board a second time, I used an external 
 enclosure to format and clone my configured system and all data to the SSD, 
 tested by booting it up from the external enclosure, and then paid a good 
 independent shop that I've done lots of business with before to do the drive 
 installation (We Fix Macs in Palo Alto, CA). They did a terrific job, turning 
 it around in a couple of hours yesterday. 
 
 Computer systems to process and render photos are as much a part of camera 
 equipment as lenses and bodies these days, and at least as important. Getting 
 this big a performance boost out of a relatively low cost, compact system 
 like the Mac mini makes it much more efficient and practical to do what I 
 like to do best: work on and produce photographs. 
 
 enjoy!
 
 Godfrey
 ---
  The fact that nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist.
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-15 Thread Richard Womer
Godders,

For those of us stingier and more cautious, would there be a
performance boost putting LR, the catalog, the cache, or some
combination on an SSD?

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
 Finally had time to install the Crucial 960G SSD that was my Xmas gift last 
 December into my Mac mini (late-2012 series, 2.6Ghz i7 Quad, with 16G RAM). 
 The saga of the installation is a long and somewhat costly bit of 
 entertainment but would certainly go way off-topic, but in the end I decided 
 to stick with just one drive internal to the mini. It's up and running since 
 last evening so I've had time to observe it through my usual range of 
 operations. The previous drive was the usual nice, solid 1T 5400rpm standard 
 drive that Apple offers for it, not bad on performance itself.

 The SSD, however, transforms the mini:

 - Boot time with Mavericks and my usual complement of stuff with the 1T HD 
 ran around 40-50 seconds, with some little bits like the DropBox plugin 
 taking up to 90 seconds to initialize. With the SSD, everything is loaded and 
 ready to run in less than 6 seconds from cold start.

 - My working catalog with Lightroom contains 89,000 raw, TIFF, and JPEG image 
 files (all originals stored on a external FW 800 drive, catalog folder on the 
 startup drive). With the 1T HD, Lightroom startup ran about 45-50 seconds. 
 Now, with the SSD, it take five seconds from clicking on it in the dock to 
 being ready for work.

 - Moving from image to image in Develop module without 1:1 Previews cached 
 when working with Sony A7 24 Mpixel images would take about 4-5 seconds with 
 the 1T HD. Now with the SSD, the load time is down to less than a second - 
 the loading notification just barely flashes onto the screen.

 - Loading a 131 Mbyte VueScan DNG file (scanned Polaroid photo) into 
 Photoshop CS5.1 from within LR used to take about 45-50 seconds with the 1T 
 HD. It's down to 9 seconds with the SSD, *including* the Photoshop startup 
 time. If Photoshop is already running, load time is about 3 seconds. Saving a 
 full-resolution, 16bit TIFF from Photoshop of that same file takes less than 
 a second.

 - ALL applications across the board on the system are now substantially 
 snappier in operation.

 The drive I received last December is the Crucial 960GB M500 2.5 Internal 
 SSD, currently available from BHPhoto for $450. I see there's a newer model 
 full 1T version now that is 20% faster on writes for another $50. That's well 
 worth the price for this kind of performance improvement.

 The boring part:

 Installing a drive into the mini is not easy. To make the four-day-long story 
 very short, an attempt to do this myself (and I'm not a total newbie to 
 changing drives in computer systems, laptops, etc …) was a failure that 
 resulted in damage to the main logic board. Luckily, my AppleCare is current 
 and the local Apple Retail Store covered a new logic board and installation 
 as warranty repair. (No, I didn't lie to them: I told them exactly how I 
 broke the fan coupling off the logic board. Their response was, Eh, it 
 happens. Let's get your machine back together for you.) They had it all done 
 and back to me in 48 hours.

 However, they would not install a non-Apple certified part like the SSD. 
 Rather than risk breaking the logic board a second time, I used an external 
 enclosure to format and clone my configured system and all data to the SSD, 
 tested by booting it up from the external enclosure, and then paid a good 
 independent shop that I've done lots of business with before to do the drive 
 installation (We Fix Macs in Palo Alto, CA). They did a terrific job, turning 
 it around in a couple of hours yesterday.

 Computer systems to process and render photos are as much a part of camera 
 equipment as lenses and bodies these days, and at least as important. Getting 
 this big a performance boost out of a relatively low cost, compact system 
 like the Mac mini makes it much more efficient and practical to do what I 
 like to do best: work on and produce photographs.

 enjoy!

 Godfrey
 ---
   The fact that nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: not necessarily OT for some ... Mac mini performance with SSD

2014-06-15 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Jun 15, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Richard Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote:

 For those of us stingier and more cautious, would there be a
 performance boost putting LR, the catalog, the cache, or some
 combination on an SSD?

Stingier … sure … but more cautious? I'm not sure I get that. 

I imagine there would be a performance improvement for some combinations of the 
app, the cache, and the catalog. How much of an improvement I couldn't say 
without testing a configuration. 

- I think the cache is the least valuable thing to worry about. I've had mine 
set to 1G, 10G, 20G, etc and noticed very little real improvement on 
performance. 

- Similarly, LR access to the original files is important but since, for the 
most part, it is read-only the best strategy there is to separate it from the 
volume where the LR catalog is and be reasonably speedy. It would be 
interesting to have a second SSD on a similar speed bus to test against 
compared to the FW800 link to reasonably quick external drives, but I don't 
have the opportunity with the hardware I have to try that out. 

- Putting LR and the catalog folder on the fastest storage medium is likely the 
most valuable thing to do. LR talks back and forth with the database and the 
previews constantly as you work, so making that as speedy as possible is 
essential. LR also uses tons of temporary space, so making sure that the OS 
startup volume is fast, that there's plenty of free space, and that there's 
plenty of free space on the LR catalog folder volume is also probably pretty 
valuable. 

- Making sure that the OS services that LR depends upon are also as fast as 
possible is also pretty important. LR multithreads … a multi-processing 
environment in terms of CPU and plenty of fast RAM to feed it is important. 

I short cut all of the above by putting the entire OS, all the apps, the Camera 
Raw cache, and the LR catalog all on the fastest bus and fastest medium, with a 
fast quad-core processor and plenty of RAM. My goal was to make a fluid and 
reasonably priced system to do the photography, and not spend forever trying to 
find the best configuration for optimum performance. I made access to the 
original files the slowest link, the FW800 bus to a external drive. The only 
way to further improve speed with this base hardware configuration would be to 
see if a Thunderbolt external disk array would net a useable improvement, and 
at what price. 

The total system I've put together, including the four external hard drives 
(for TM backup, working photo repository, two archives) would be about $3500 
retail. Not cheap but not off the edge considering the performance. I'm 
moderately stingy when it comes to buying stuff I don't need or want, this was 
less expensive in dollars than the original Macintosh + external drive + 
printer system I bought back in 1984, with more valuable money. The difference 
in performance and capability (and for the buck) is mind-boggling if your 
memory stretches back that far…  :-)

Godfrey
---
  The fact that nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.