RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:34602] Today's quiz





Goering? Goebbels? (BTW, what's the source?)



Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




 -Original Message-
 From: Forstater, Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:06 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [PEN-L:34602] Today's quiz
 
 
 Who said:
 
 Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the 
 leaders of
 the country who determine the policy, and it's always a 
 simple matter to
 drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist 
 dictatorship,
 or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the
 people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
 easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and
 denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing 
 the country
 to greater danger.
 
 ?
 
 





Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Michael Perelman
goehring
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:06:22AM -0600, Forstater, Mathew wrote:
 Who said:
 
 Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of
 the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to
 drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship,
 or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the
 people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
 easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and
 denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country
 to greater danger.
 
 ?
 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Forstater, Mathew
Goering is right. Is it that well-known or is it going around the net?
Or are you guys really, really smart?




RE: RE: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:34607] RE: Re: Today's quiz





I really wonder if it's really Goering, since a few years ago there was a spurious (and similar) quote from Hitler floating about. (My copy of THEY DIDN'T SAY THAT, which debunks famous quotes is at home.) 


Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




 -Original Message-
 From: Forstater, Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:35 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [PEN-L:34607] RE: Re: Today's quiz
 
 
 Goering is right. Is it that well-known or is it going around the net?
 Or are you guys really, really smart?
 
 





RE: RE: RE: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Forstater, Mathew
Title: RE: [PEN-L:34607] RE: Re: Today's quiz









One of the Urban legends sites says it is actually
true.



-Original Message-
From: Devine, James
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003
10:43 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [PEN-L:34609] RE: RE: Re:
Today's quiz



I really wonder if it's really Goering, since a few
years ago there was a spurious (and similar) quote from Hitler floating about.
(My copy of THEY DIDN'T SAY THAT, which debunks famous quotes is at
home.) 

 
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




 -Original Message- 
 From: Forstater, Mathew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

 Sent: Wednesday, February 12,
2003 8:35 AM 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Subject: [PEN-L:34607] RE: Re:
Today's quiz 
 
 
 Goering is right. Is it that
well-known or is it going around the net? 
 Or are you guys really, really
smart? 
 
 








RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Forstater, Mathew
Jim wanted the source. Apparently it was from the Nuremburg trials,
although a very similar statement is in In War.  Since you guys think
you are so hot, try this one:

Now I am prowling through the backyard and I am hiding under the car
and I've gotten out of everything I've gotten into so far and I eat when
I am hungry and I travel alone.




Re: RE: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread ravi
Forstater, Mathew wrote:
 Goering is right. Is it that well-known or is it going around the net?
 Or are you guys really, really smart?
 

it is going around the net. and independently, yes, we guys are really,
really smart - which is why we spend our time debating formal logic
rather than protesting on the streets! ;-) (running for cover),

--ravi




Re: Re: RE: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Ian Murray

- Original Message - 
From: ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 it is going around the net. and independently, yes, we guys are really,
 really smart - which is why we spend our time debating formal logic
 rather than protesting on the streets! ;-) (running for cover),
 
 --ravi


Some of us do that too




Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread ravi
Ian Murray wrote:
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
it is going around the net. and independently, yes, we guys are really,
really smart - which is why we spend our time debating formal logic
rather than protesting on the streets! ;-) (running for cover),
 
 Some of us do that too
 

i am sure you do - i was only kidding. no insult intended to you, jimD,
or other participants. it was more of a self-referential thing (in
keeping with the paradoxes we have been discussing!). i shall be going
to my first big rally in this country this saturday - the anti-war one
in NYC.

TBS played born on the fourth of july last evening - a populist slap
on the face for dubya. is the media sensing a shifting tide? or is TBS
owned by ted turner who is rumoured to be more liberal than the rest?

--ravi




Re: Re: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread andie nachgeborenen
Origins:  Another

 



timely quote in the vein of the apocryphal Julius Caesar warning about political leaders who can all too easily send the citizenry marching eagerly off to war by manufacturing crises that purportedly threaten national security and making popular appeals to patriotism. In this case the sentiment expressed is even more disturbing because it comes not from a venerated figure of antiquity, but supposedly from a reviled twentieth-century figure associated with the most chilling example of genocide in human history: Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshall and Luftwaffe-Chief. We may be made somewhat uneasy by the idea that the head of a classic  civilization recognized 2,000 years ago that the populace could be manipulated into sacrificing themselves in wars at the whims of their leaders, but we're outraged (and maybe even scared) at the thought of a fat Nazi fascist flunky's recognizing and telling us the same thing. 
The notable difference here is that although the Caesar quote is a latter-day fabrication, the words attributed to Hermann Goering are real. Goering was one of the highest-ranking Nazis who survived to be captured and put on trial for war crimes in the city of Nuremberg by the Allies after the end of World War II. He was found guilty on charges of "war crimes," "crimes against peace," and "crimes against humanity" by the Nuremberg tribunal and sentenced to death by hanging. The sentence could not be carried out, however, because Goering committed suicide with smuggled cyanide capsules hours before his execution, scheduled for 15 October 1946. 
The quote cited above does not appear in transcripts of the Nuremberg trials because although Goering spoke these words during the course of the proceedings, he did not offer them at his trial. His comments were made privately to Gustave Gilbert, a German-speaking intelligence officer and psychologist who was granted free access by the Allies to all the prisoners held in the Nuremberg jail. Gilbert kept a journal of his observations of the proceedings and his conversations with the prisoners, which he later published in the book Nuremberg Diary. The quote offered above was part of a conversation Gilbert held with a dejected Hermann Goering in his cell on the evening of 18 April 1946, as the trials were halted for a three-day Easter recess: 


Sweating in his cell in the evening, Goering was defensive and deflated and not very happy over the turn the trial was taking. He said that he had no control over the actions or the defense of the others, and that he had never been anti-Semitic himself, had not believed these atrocities, and that several Jews had offered to testify in his behalf. If [Hans] Frank [Governor-General of occupied Poland] had known about atrocities in 1943, he should have come to him and he would have tried to do something about it. He might not have had enough power to change things in 1943, but if somebody had come to him in 1941 or 1942 he could have forced a showdown. (I still did not have the desire at this point to tell him what [SS General Otto] Ohlendorf had said to this: that Goering had been written off as an effective "moderating" influence, because of his drug addiction and corruption.) I pointed out that with his "temperamental utterances," such as preferring the ki!
lling of 200 Jews to the destruction of property, he had hardly set himself up as champion of minority rights. Goering protested that too much weight was being put on these temperamental utterances. Furthermore, he made it clear that he was not defending or glorifying Hitler. 
Later in the conversation, Gilbert recorded Goering's observations that the common people can always be manipulated into supporting and fighting wars by their political leaders: 


We got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction. 
"Why, of course, the people don't want war," Goering shrugged. "Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship." 
"There is one difference," I pointed out. "In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars." 
"Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of 

RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: Today's quiz





no insult taken. I am very upset that I won't be able to attend the demo, since I'm flying to New York (on a red-eye!) to see my father-in-law inducted into the Toy-makers' Hall of Fame (for inventing the yacket-yak teeth, among other things) and then flying home almost immediately. 


Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine




 -Original Message-
 From: ravi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:21 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [PEN-L:34617] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Today's quiz
 
 
 Ian Murray wrote:
  - Original Message - 
  From: ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 it is going around the net. and independently, yes, we guys 
 are really,
 really smart - which is why we spend our time debating formal logic
 rather than protesting on the streets! ;-) (running for cover),
  
  Some of us do that too
  
 
 i am sure you do - i was only kidding. no insult intended to 
 you, jimD,
 or other participants. it was more of a self-referential thing (in
 keeping with the paradoxes we have been discussing!). i shall be going
 to my first big rally in this country this saturday - the anti-war one
 in NYC.
 
 TBS played born on the fourth of july last evening - a populist slap
 on the face for dubya. is the media sensing a shifting tide? or is TBS
 owned by ted turner who is rumoured to be more liberal than the rest?
 
  --ravi
 
 





Re: RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread dsquared



no insult taken. I am very upset that I won't be able
to attend the demo, since I'm flying to New York (on
a red-eye!) to see my father-in-law inducted into the
Toy-makers' Hall of Fame (for inventing theĀ 
yacket-yak teeth, among other things) and then flying
home almost immediately. 

jeepers, that's some pretty high-flying company your
fatherinlaw is keeping:

http://www.toy-tma.com/industry/halloffame/listing.htm




Re Today's Quiz - the source

2003-02-12 Thread Ralph Johansen
Verified by VisaHermann Goering

Claim:   Hermann Goering proclaimed that although the people don't want
war, they can always be brought to the bidding of their leaders.
Status:   True.

Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2002]


Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the
country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag
the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for
lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials

Origins:   Another
timely quote in the vein of the apocryphal Julius Caesar warning about
political leaders who can all too easily send the citizenry marching eagerly
off to war by manufacturing crises that purportedly threaten national
security and making popular appeals to patriotism. In this case the
sentiment expressed is even more disturbing because it comes not from a
venerated figure of antiquity, but supposedly from a reviled
twentieth-century figure associated with the most chilling example of
genocide in human history: Hermann Goering, Nazi Reichsmarshall and
Luftwaffe-Chief. We may be made somewhat uneasy by the idea that the head of
a classic civilization recognized 2,000 years ago that the populace could be
manipulated into sacrificing themselves in wars at the whims of their
leaders, but we're outraged (and maybe even scared) at the thought of a fat
Nazi fascist flunky's recognizing and telling us the same thing.

The notable difference here is that although the Caesar quote is a
latter-day fabrication, the words attributed to Hermann Goering are real.
Goering was one of the highest-ranking Nazis who survived to be captured and
put on trial for war crimes in the city of Nuremberg by the Allies after the
end of World War II. He was found guilty on charges of war crimes, crimes
against peace, and crimes against humanity by the Nuremberg tribunal and
sentenced to death by hanging. The sentence could not be carried out,
however, because Goering committed suicide with smuggled cyanide capsules
hours before his execution, scheduled for 15 October 1946.

The quote cited above does not appear in transcripts of the Nuremberg trials
because although Goering spoke these words during the course of the
proceedings, he did not offer them at his trial. His comments were made
privately to Gustave Gilbert, a German-speaking intelligence officer and
psychologist who was granted free access by the Allies to all the prisoners
held in the Nuremberg jail. Gilbert kept a journal of his observations of
the proceedings and his conversations with the prisoners, which he later
published in the book Nuremberg Diary. The quote offered above was part of a
conversation Gilbert held with a dejected Hermann Goering in his cell on the
evening of 18 April 1946, as the trials were halted for a three-day Easter
recess:


Sweating in his cell in the evening, Goering was defensive and deflated and
not very happy over the turn the trial was taking. He said that he had no
control over the actions or the defense of the others, and that he had never
been anti-Semitic himself, had not believed these atrocities, and that
several Jews had offered to testify in his behalf. If [Hans] Frank
[Governor-General of occupied Poland] had known about atrocities in 1943, he
should have come to him and he would have tried to do something about it. He
might not have had enough power to change things in 1943, but if somebody
had come to him in 1941 or 1942 he could have forced a showdown. (I still
did not have the desire at this point to tell him what [SS General Otto]
Ohlendorf had said to this: that Goering had been written off as an
effective moderating influence, because of his drug addiction and
corruption.) I pointed out that with his temperamental utterances, such as
preferring the killing of 200 Jews to the destruction of property, he had
hardly set himself up as champion of minority rights. Goering protested that
too much weight was being put on these temperamental utterances.
Furthermore, he made it clear that he was not defending or glorifying
Hitler.
Later in the conversation, Gilbert recorded Goering's observations that the
common people can always be manipulated into supporting and fighting wars by
their political leaders:

We got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his
attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for
leaders who bring them war and destruction.

Why, of course, the people don't want war, Goering shrugged. Why would
some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that
he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally,
the common people don't want 

Re: RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Gil Skillman


 Since you guys think
you are so hot, try this one:

Now I am prowling through the backyard and I am hiding under the car
and I've gotten out of everything I've gotten into so far and I eat when
I am hungry and I travel alone.


Hint, everybody:  notice how a lot of the phrase rhymes, sort of like song 
lyrics.

Virtuously,

Gil



Re: Re: RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread andie nachgeborenen
Virtue by Ani DiFranco




virtue is relative at best there's nothing worse than a sunset when you're driving due west and i'm afraid that my love is gonna come up short there is no there there i guess i'm scared cuz i want to have good news to !
report every time i come up for air now i'm cruising through a chromakey blue sky and i know that in an hour or three the sun is gonna be in my eyes and i know that sometimes all i can see is how i feel like the whole world is on the other side of a dirty windshield and i'm tryin to see through the gla!
re yes i'm struggling just to see what's there the one person who really knows me best says i'm like a cat yeah the kind of cat that you just can't pick up and throw into your lap no, the kind that doesn't mind being held only wh!
en its her idea yeah, the kind that feels what she decides to feel when she is good and ready to feel it and now i am prowling through the backyard and i am hiding under the car i have gotten out of everything i've gotten into so far i eat when I am hungry and i travel alone and just outside the glow of the house is where i feel most at home but in the window you sometimes appear and your music is faint in my ears 
Gil Skillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Since you guys thinkyou are so hot, try this one:"Now I am prowling through the backyard and I am hiding under the carand I've gotten out of everything I've gotten into so far and I eat whenI am hungry and I travel alone."Hint, everybody: notice how a lot of the phrase rhymes, sort of like song lyrics.Virtuously,GilDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day

Re: RE: Today's quiz

2003-02-12 Thread Chris Burford
At 12/02/03 10:41 -0600, Matthew wrote:

Jim wanted the source. Apparently it was from the Nuremburg trials,
although a very similar statement is in In War.  Since you guys think
you are so hot, try this one:

Now I am prowling through the backyard and I am hiding under the car
and I've gotten out of everything I've gotten into so far and I eat when
I am hungry and I travel alone.



You need to disable Google first for it to be any test of brilliance.

Chris Burford