Re: [PHP] Bug in DOMDocument schemaValidate() function?
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Voß, Marko marko.v...@fiz-karlsruhe.de wrote:
Hello,
I am validating user DOM against schema files using the following piece of
code:
$valid = @$doc-schemaValidate($xsdFile);
where $doc is of type DOMDocument and $xsdFile is the file location of the
XSD file.
Everything worked fine until the following validation occured:
A validation of a XML against the SRW/U schema
(http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru1-1archive/xml-files/srw-types.xsd)
failed.
Here is the XML:
-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
srw:explainResponse xmlns:srw=http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/;
xmlns:zr=http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/;
srw:version1.1/srw:version
srw:record
srw:recordSchemahttp://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0//srw:recordSchema
srw:recordPackingXML/srw:recordPacking
srw:recordData
zr:explain
zr:serverInfo wsdl=http://myserver.com/db; protocol=SRU
version=1.1
hostmyserver.com/host
port80/port
databasesru/database
/zr:serverInfo
zr:databaseInfo
title lang=en primary=trueSRU Test Database/title
description lang=en primary=true My server SRU Test
Database/description
/zr:databaseInfo
zr:metaInfo
dateModified27-11-2003/dateModified
/zr:metaInfo
/zr:explain
/srw:recordData
/srw:record
/srw:explainResponse
-
This XML is valid. However, I keep getting the following libxml error:
object(LibXMLError)#192 (6) {
[level]=
int(2)
[code]=
int(1871)
[column]=
int(0)
[message]=
string(133) Element '{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}record': This element
is not expected. Expected is (
{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}version ).
[file]=
string(0)
[line]=
int(0)
}
I think, the validator is unable to handle the xsd:extension part of the
schema:
xsd:complexType name=explainResponseType
xsd:complexContent
xsd:extension base=responseType
xsd:sequencexsd:element ref=record/
xsd:element ref=echoedExplainRequest minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=diagnostics minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=extraResponseData minOccurs=0/
/xsd:sequence
/xsd:extension
/xsd:complexContent
/xsd:complexType
The version-element exists and is at the right place. If I add another
version-element after the first one, it complains
about expecting a record-element instead, which is correct. But it is not
correct to expect another version-element
after the already existing one.
Is this a bug? Or did I made a mistake somewhere and I am not able to see it
right now?
Thank you for any help!
Best regards,
Marko
If you're 100% sure this XML is valid, then this is a bug. You should
report it at bugs.php.net, but it is most likely this bug is in
libXML, and needs to be fixed there.
- Matijn
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in DOMDocument schemaValidate() function?
Hello,
I am sorry, but everything is ok here. I am performing an unmarshalling and
marshalling unit test for every resource and
the problem was, that after unmarshalling to the object, the marshalling of the
object did not create the version
element. I did not notice this in the first place.
So the validation error occured after the step of testing the marshalling and
not before testing the unmarshalling.
Thank you anyways!
Best regards,
Marko
Am 14.05.2012 16:43, schrieb Matijn Woudt:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Voß, Markomarko.v...@fiz-karlsruhe.de
wrote:
Hello,
I am validating user DOM against schema files using the following piece of
code:
$valid = @$doc-schemaValidate($xsdFile);
where $doc is of type DOMDocument and $xsdFile is the file location of the
XSD file.
Everything worked fine until the following validation occured:
A validation of a XML against the SRW/U schema
(http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru1-1archive/xml-files/srw-types.xsd)
failed.
Here is the XML:
-
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
srw:explainResponse xmlns:srw=http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/;
xmlns:zr=http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/;
srw:version1.1/srw:version
srw:record
srw:recordSchemahttp://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0//srw:recordSchema
srw:recordPackingXML/srw:recordPacking
srw:recordData
zr:explain
zr:serverInfo wsdl=http://myserver.com/db; protocol=SRU
version=1.1
hostmyserver.com/host
port80/port
databasesru/database
/zr:serverInfo
zr:databaseInfo
title lang=en primary=trueSRU Test Database/title
description lang=en primary=true My server SRU Test
Database/description
/zr:databaseInfo
zr:metaInfo
dateModified27-11-2003/dateModified
/zr:metaInfo
/zr:explain
/srw:recordData
/srw:record
/srw:explainResponse
-
This XML is valid. However, I keep getting the following libxml error:
object(LibXMLError)#192 (6) {
[level]=
int(2)
[code]=
int(1871)
[column]=
int(0)
[message]=
string(133) Element '{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}record': This
element is not expected. Expected is (
{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}version ).
[file]=
string(0)
[line]=
int(0)
}
I think, the validator is unable to handle the xsd:extension part of the
schema:
xsd:complexType name=explainResponseType
xsd:complexContent
xsd:extension base=responseType
xsd:sequencexsd:element ref=record/
xsd:element ref=echoedExplainRequest minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=diagnostics minOccurs=0/
xsd:element ref=extraResponseData minOccurs=0/
/xsd:sequence
/xsd:extension
/xsd:complexContent
/xsd:complexType
The version-element exists and is at the right place. If I add another
version-element after the first one, it complains
about expecting a record-element instead, which is correct. But it is not
correct to expect another version-element
after the already existing one.
Is this a bug? Or did I made a mistake somewhere and I am not able to see it
right now?
Thank you for any help!
Best regards,
Marko
If you're 100% sure this XML is valid, then this is a bug. You should
report it at bugs.php.net, but it is most likely this bug is in
libXML, and needs to be fixed there.
- Matijn
---
Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische
Information mbH.
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB
101892.
Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt.
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner.
Re: [PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5
Because php5.4 compression not normal work. So I have to enable IIS7.5 system compression. ok. now please check the www.ongod.org/test/phpinfo.php site. just now I have close IIS compression. PHP5.4 sure can't work with zlib.output_compression. windows php enable by default. Now I have study try building php5.4 x64 by myself. but I can't building php ext. only building success php 5.4.1 main code.Who will tell me how building full php5.4.x ? -- Original -- From: Simon Schicksimonsimc...@googlemail.com; Date: Wed, Mar 21, 2012 03:21 PM To: 小鱼虾i...@xiaoyu.org; Cc: php-generalphp-general@lists.php.net; Subject: Re: [PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5 2012/3/19 小鱼虾 i...@xiaoyu.org How I do fix it ? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61434 Hi, I got a rough overview of the conversation in the bug-tracker ... You were always talking about a tool you used to test the gzip-compression ... but why not test it natively? Using Firefox (with the extension Firebug) or Safari / Chrome for example you can easily view the respond-header from the server and get more info out of that. Just press F12, click on the network-tab, select your request and search in the response-header for Content-Encoding: ... I would write my own small php-test-script where you just output some text. Then you're sure that not other code is doing something strange. Another possible problem: Is the extension zlib enabled at all? The documentation says that it's disabled by default ... http://www.php.net/manual/en/zlib.installation.php Bye Simon
Re: [PHP] Bug zlib.output_compression not normal work in IIS7.5
2012/3/19 小鱼虾 i...@xiaoyu.org How I do fix it ? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61434 Hi, I got a rough overview of the conversation in the bug-tracker ... You were always talking about a tool you used to test the gzip-compression ... but why not test it natively? Using Firefox (with the extension Firebug) or Safari / Chrome for example you can easily view the respond-header from the server and get more info out of that. Just press F12, click on the network-tab, select your request and search in the response-header for Content-Encoding: ... I would write my own small php-test-script where you just output some text. Then you're sure that not other code is doing something strange. Another possible problem: Is the extension zlib enabled at all? The documentation says that it's disabled by default ... http://www.php.net/manual/en/zlib.installation.php Bye Simon -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug 51860
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello folks, any chance this one is ever fixed? https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=51860 I am a customer of 11. They told me they will not upgrade until this one is fixed. Imagine that there are thousands of customers running php 5.2.17 just because of this issue. Unfortunately I am not able to fix this on myself - my C-fu is not good enough. Because big hosters like 11 do not upgrade, we (the Apache log4php team) cannot make use of newer PHP versions too. We have decided to use the features once we see the old hosters move on. Same is true for other projects of mine. If we would upgrade we loose all the people on the big hosting companies. I think it is in the interest of the PHP-dev team to see people moving on. Otherwise at someday software like phpBB, wordpress et al will not work on many hosts at some day in future. Not sure if there has been any plans on this issue - i am very much interested in this and would like know if it is already on the schedule. Thanks, Christian This list is for users having problems with PHP scripts etc. If you want to contact the devs, you're on the wrong mailing list (there's a special one for it) Matijn -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug?
De: Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com Para: php-general@lists.php.net php-general@lists.php.net Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2011 7:07 Assunto: [PHP] Bug? Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different Regards, Igor Escobar *Software Engineer * + http://blog.igorescobar.com + http://www.igorescobar.com + @igorescobar http://www.twitter.com/igorescobar The person who posted this (andersonfraga) has set up four string comparison tests. It was commented by augustohp who said:- float_a.php Existe uma configuração no php.ini da precisão de números de ponto flutuante. Acima desse número, todos são arredondados. There is a configuration setting in php.ini that determines the precision of floating point numbers. A number greater than that setting causes rounding. float_b.php Com a bcmath você não está comparando tipos especializados de dados, mas sim dados binários. É mais demorado, mas é extremamente preciso, sempre. With bcmath you are doing a binary comparison. It is slower but precise, always. string_a.php Quando você usa == você não compara os tipos, e não força o interpretador a respeitar o tipo de dado fornecido. O que acontece então!? O PHP converte o tipo para o tipo de dado mais apropriado em uma condição: boolean, inteiro, etc ... Se você converter para inteiro, vai ver que os números são iguais. When you use the == operator you don't compare data types and don't force the interpreter to respect the data type supplied. What happens then? PHP converts the type to the most appropriate data type and returns a boolean. (I assume he means casting. I always thought that you had to cast the variables implicitly in order to use ==.) I think he is saying in the next sentence that if you cast them to integers, you'll see that the numbers are equal. Doesn't make any sense to me, but then, I'm no expert. string_b.php Aqui sim você compara strings, garante que elas não sofram cast para outro tipo de dado. Você pode atingir isso usando === também, sem essa função de comparação de strings. Here you compare strings, and guarantee that they don't suffer casting to another data type. You can achieve the same thing by using the === operator also, without (using) this string comparison function. Hope this helps. Cheers, Robert
Re: [PHP] Bug?
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 17:07, Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different About this part are you confused? -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug?
I'm confused about the output of the code... very disturbed. But @*augustohphttps://gist.github.com/augustohp * already respond the question on the gist thread (in portuguese) and explained why those results. Regards, Igor Escobar *Software Engineer * + http://blog.igorescobar.com + http://www.igorescobar.com + @igorescobar http://www.twitter.com/igorescobar On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 17:07, Igor Escobar titiolin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone can explain this? https://gist.github.com/1220404 Part of the code are in portuguese so... iguais = equal diferentes = different About this part are you confused? -- /Daniel P. Brown Network Infrastructure Manager http://www.php.net/
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Hi, I have opend Bug #51739 in 2010. It was closed as bogus before my last question was answered. It would be fine to know what you think about that bug. In short: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) This is because 8315 is treated as base and e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d is treated as an exponent. My hint that e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d is not a valid exponent was not answered. What do you think about? cheers Daniel The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. This is what drives me crazy. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. cheers Daniel The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. --- Simon Welsh Admin of http://simon.geek.nz/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
Simon J Welsh writes: On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. Ok, then let's discuss the documented behavior ;-) Do you (not the document) really like this behavior? I mean if I am the only one wondering about that behavior it is ok for me. I just want to help PHP. cheers Daniel -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
Le 01/09/2011 10:43, magic-...@damage.devloop.de a écrit : Simon J Welsh writes: On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. Ok, then let's discuss the documented behavior ;-) Do you (not the document) really like this behavior? I mean if I am the only one wondering about that behavior it is ok for me. I just want to help PHP. cheers Daniel No professional programmer would like this kind of behavior. But PHP want to be accessible for newbies so we have to deal with that. Hope this will be fixed in the next generation... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug #51739 tricky string to float conversion
On 1/09/2011, at 8:43 PM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Simon J Welsh writes: On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie: On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote: var_dump((float)8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d); results in float(INF) The cast to float is truncating the invalid characters and since your string contains a float that is INF (8315e839) before the truncation at the d, then it returns INF. Makes perfect sense. If I use a string in PHP I don't want PHP to cut this string. Either it uses this string as it is or it gives me an error/warning/false (what ever...). But silently(!!!) using a small piece of a string is not understandable. The manual clearly states this is how a string is converted into a number: http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.conversion The value is given by the initial portion of the string. If the string starts with valid numeric data, this will be the value used. Otherwise, the value will be 0 (zero). Valid numeric data is an optional sign, followed by one or more digits (optionally containing a decimal point), followed by an optional exponent. The exponent is an 'e' or 'E' followed by one or more digits. If you don't want the string turned into a number using the documented method, don't use it as one. Ok, then let's discuss the documented behavior ;-) Do you (not the document) really like this behavior? I mean if I am the only one wondering about that behavior it is ok for me. I just want to help PHP. cheers Daniel Yes, I think the way it works is correct. It follows similar conversions when changing from a data type that allows more data to one that allows less. Similar things happen when converting from a floating point to integral value. It also directly correlates to the C functions for doing the same thing (atof, strtod, the like). --- Simon Welsh Admin of http://simon.geek.nz/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in mkdir?
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:32 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Using 5.2.9
I'm trying to create a directory but it is being created with incorrect
permissions. I'm following the online manual.
This is the command being used:
mkdir('/srv/www/domain/data/R1276190214358/thumbs', 0770, true);
This is what is created:
drwxr-x--- 2 apache apache 4096 2010-06-10 10:33 R1276190214358
Isn't that supposed to be 0770 instead of 0750? Either the manual is
wrong, the command is broken, or I'm screwing it up (most likely).
Thanks for any help,
Mike Wright
Did the R1276190214358 directory already exist? If so, it will retain
the permissions it had, and only the thumbs sub-directory within it will
have the new permissions.
Also, is this on a shared hosting server? It could be that a security
restriction in-place is not allowing the permissions to be configured as
the directory is written, and you may have to manually update them with
the chmod() function.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] bug in mkdir? [SOLVED]
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:32 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Using 5.2.9
I'm trying to create a directory but it is being created with incorrect
permissions. I'm following the online manual.
This is the command being used:
mkdir('/srv/www/domain/data/R1276190214358/thumbs', 0770, true);
This is what is created:
drwxr-x--- 2 apache apache 4096 2010-06-10 10:33 R1276190214358
Isn't that supposed to be 0770 instead of 0750? Either the manual is
wrong, the command is broken, or I'm screwing it up (most likely).
Thanks for any help,
Mike Wright
Hi, Ash. Thanks for the help.
Did the R1276190214358 directory already exist?
No.
If so, it will retain
the permissions it had, and only the thumbs sub-directory within it will
have the new permissions.
Also, is this on a shared hosting server? It could be that a security
restriction in-place is not allowing the permissions to be configured as
the directory is written, and you may have to manually update them with
the chmod() function.
It's under my control.
Solution: run umask(000) first. (of the 3 choices above it turned out
to be #3 ;(
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
There is something new based on Trac but written in PHP. mtrack (http://bitbucket.org/wez/mtrack/wiki/Home) It is written by one of the PHP Core Developers (Wez Furlong). May be you want to try it out. Best, Anshul On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote: shiplu wrote: I want to add with Andre. I am looking for a free hosted bug tracking solution. I can not afford to host it in my web server. So is there any free one?? It should not be public. Only me and my clients will be able to see it. Thanks yes, for all cases, commercial or not; self hosted or remote; indefero [1] is a fantastic quick to use solution: [1] http://www.indefero.net/ Many Regards, Nathan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
2010/3/29 Anshul Agrawal drinknder...@gmail.com There is something new based on Trac but written in PHP. mtrack (http://bitbucket.org/wez/mtrack/wiki/Home) It is written by one of the PHP Core Developers (Wez Furlong). May be you want to try it out. And there's something quite new that's aimed to be like trac : JotBug http://code.google.com/p/jotbug/ Regards
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Jan G.B. ro0ot.w...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/3/29 Anshul Agrawal drinknder...@gmail.com There is something new based on Trac but written in PHP. mtrack (http://bitbucket.org/wez/mtrack/wiki/Home) It is written by one of the PHP Core Developers (Wez Furlong). May be you want to try it out. And there's something quite new that's aimed to be like trac : JotBug http://code.google.com/p/jotbug/ Regards I kept wondering for long time why PHP community doesn't have something at least as cool as Trac. Times are changing :) -- Anshul
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 16:28 +0300, Andre Polykanine wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. -- With best regards from Ukraine, Andre Http://oire.org/ - The Fantasy blogs of Oire Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ jabber.org Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952 Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule I think your best option is Mantis. It's written in PHP, does all that you've asked, and it's pretty easy to use really. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On 03/28/2010 06:58 PM, Andre Polykanine wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. http://www.google.co.in/search?aq=0oq=php+bugsourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+bug+tracker -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Administrator www.itech7.com मेरा भारत महान ! मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
Ashley Sheridan wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 16:28 +0300, Andre Polykanine wrote: Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. I think your best option is Mantis. It's written in PHP, does all that you've asked, and it's pretty easy to use really. agreed, unless IDE integration and familiarity is the name of the game, in which case the usual suspects of trac, jira and bugzilla are worth considering. regards! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
Use drupal with the bug tracking system http://drupal.org/project/project_issue On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Andre Polykanine an...@oire.org wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. -- With best regards from Ukraine, Andre Http://oire.org/ - The Fantasy blogs of Oire Skype: Francophile; WlmMSN: arthaelon @ yandex.ru; Jabber: arthaelon @ jabber.org Yahoo! messenger: andre.polykanine; ICQ: 191749952 Twitter: http://twitter.com/m_elensule -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Bhaskar Tiwari GTSE Generalist Directory Services Microsoft All we have to decide is what to do with the time that has been given to us http://www.ebhakt.com/ http://fytclub.net/ http://ebhakt.info/
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
On 03/28/2010 07:25 PM, ebhakt wrote: Use drupal with the bug tracking system http://drupal.org/project/project_issue http://drupal.org/project/project_issue On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com mailto:li...@itech7.com wrote: On 03/28/2010 06:58 PM, Andre Polykanine wrote: Hello everyone, Can you recommend a bug tracking system to be installed on the site? Requirements: written in PHP (or maybe Perl); tickets system; e-mail notifications. http://www.google.co.in/search?aq=0oq=php+bugsourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+bug+tracker http://www.google.co.in/search?aq=0oq=php+bugsourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+bug+tracker -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Administrator www.itech7.com http://www.itech7.com मेरा भारत महान ! मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- Bhaskar Tiwari GTSE Generalist Directory Services Microsoft All we have to decide is what to do with the time that has been given to us http://www.ebhakt.com/ http://fytclub.net/ http://ebhakt.info/ Hey, I wasn't the one who put up the question. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Site Server Administrator www.itech7.com मेरा भारत महान ! मम भारत: महत्तम भवतु ! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
I want to add with Andre. I am looking for a free hosted bug tracking solution. I can not afford to host it in my web server. So is there any free one?? It should not be public. Only me and my clients will be able to see it. Thanks -- Shiplu Mokaddim My talks, http://talk.cmyweb.net Follow me, http://twitter.com/shiplu SUST Programmers, http://groups.google.com/group/p2psust Innovation distinguishes bet ... ... (ask Steve Jobs the rest) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug tracking system
shiplu wrote: I want to add with Andre. I am looking for a free hosted bug tracking solution. I can not afford to host it in my web server. So is there any free one?? It should not be public. Only me and my clients will be able to see it. Thanks yes, for all cases, commercial or not; self hosted or remote; indefero [1] is a fantastic quick to use solution: [1] http://www.indefero.net/ Many Regards, Nathan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello,
Besides the .htaccess which might be an apache configuration problem if
you use ini_set(mbstring.func_overload,2) in a script of this
directory does it work?
no, also the ini_set does not work for this Directive.
Sorry for the late reply.
The ini_set is meant to be used inside a php script not in an .htaccess
file.
So perhaps you could test this in a script specific manner.
In addition to this heck your apache configuration to see if you allow
.htaccess to be parsed.
apache and .htaccess are ok
i added a scond line which changes mbstring.encoding_translation from
off to on without problems:
Directive Local Value Master Value
mbstring.encoding_translation On Off
mbstring.func_overload 0 0
.htaccess:
php_value mbstring.func_overload 2
php_flag mbstring.encoding_translation On
IMHO this is not a good practice using .htaccess to alter php's behavior.
Perhaps you should consider ini_set after all.
Can you confirm or rebut this behavior?
Should we go to internals list?
Thanks,
Andre
Unfortunately I can confirm that.
This is a list with all the initial values you are allowed to change:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.list.php
This is a script that shows all the mbstring extension values in an array:
?php
print pre;
print_r(ini_get_all('mbstring'));
?
This array contains the default,local values and access level for each one.
Note that according to the manual:
http://www.php.net/ini_get_all
The access levels for every value are:|
Constant Value Meaning
PHP_INI_USER 1 Entry can be set in user scripts
PHP_INI_PERDIR2 Entry can be set in php.ini, .htaccess or
httpd.conf
PHP_INI_SYSTEM4 Entry can be set in php.ini or httpd.conf
PHP_INI_ALL 7 Entry can be set anywhere
|Although in the ini list the mbstring is supposed to have access level
2 I've noticed that I have access level 4 for mbstring.func_overload.
Perhaps *this is the problem*. You have access level 4 so that is why
you can't change the value using .htaccess.
I don't know if this is an expected behavior though. Can anyone else
confirm this??
--
Thodoris
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, Sorry for the late reply. no problem. The ini_set is meant to be used inside a php script not in an .htaccess file. So perhaps you could test this in a script specific manner. i know;) i do php/apache for some years... i found out the problem in meanwhile. http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47187edit=1 Its not allowed anymore, just not documented. formerly bug was fixed by deactivating ;) thats a pitty cause the patch for 3rd party patch for ~5.2.6 for mentioned bug worked really good. :( Thanks, Andre -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, Besides the .htaccess which might be an apache configuration problem if you use ini_set(mbstring.func_overload,2) in a script of this directory does it work? no, also the ini_set does not work for this Directive. In addition to this heck your apache configuration to see if you allow .htaccess to be parsed. apache and .htaccess are ok i added a scond line which changes mbstring.encoding_translation from off to on without problems: Directive Local Value Master Value mbstring.encoding_translation On Off mbstring.func_overload 0 0 .htaccess: php_value mbstring.func_overload 2 php_flag mbstring.encoding_translation On Can you confirm or rebut this behavior? Should we go to internals list? Thanks, Andre -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug or expected, mbstring.func_overload not changeable by .htaccess 5.2.8/5.2.9
Hello, following in my .htaccess works with php 5.2.6 (mod_php) php_value mbstring.func_overload 2 Seems that since (5.2.7?) 5.2.8/5.2.9 this value is not any more accepted by php in .htaccess. mbstring.func_overload should be changeable by PHP_INI_PERDIR which includes .htaccess Other values are changeable by .htaccess so it should not be a general problem on my side. Please someone could check this? Thanks, Andre Besides the .htaccess which might be an apache configuration problem if you use ini_set(mbstring.func_overload,2) in a script of this directory does it work? In addition to this heck your apache configuration to see if you allow .htaccess to be parsed. -- Thodoris -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: php bug from 2003 still alive?! - UTF8 BOM
Hello everybody, has anybody an idea on how to fix this? Is it really necessary to recomplile for utf-8 BOM support? Regards, Merlin Merlin Morgenstern wrote: Hello, I am experiencing problems with utf-8 and php. There seems to be a problem with BOM. Some postings say that I have to compile php with --enable-zend-multibyte. HOwever those postings are very old (2003!). http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22108 Is this still necessary with the newest php build? If yes, do you believe I will run into trouble on sites that are saved in ansi? Thank you for any hint. Merlin -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Korgan schreef:
Korgan napsal(a):
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned
on, you would see that you are using an undefined variable in your
method called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the resulting
value (which would always be zero) to $count.
Sorry i didnt see it :). In the script is $count = (int)$count;
no point in anyone trying to help you then, because you don't post the code
you use, you post something else instead ... this is not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
btw there is practically no chance of a bug being in array_key_exists() and
you being the first to spot it, as a function it's used way too much to be
able to fly under the bug radar. jmho.
After add a item value is ok look at first B vardump which is on the end
of the script.
No variable $count is mandatory so that is defined.
But its not main idea of my question...
Function add items correctly, but if go to next page, values in array
change. Values are changed passing from one page to another one, why
and where?
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next
page count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Korgan napsal(a):
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned on,
you would see that you are using an undefined variable in your method
called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the resulting value
(which would always be zero) to $count.
Sorry i didnt see it :). In the script is $count = (int)$count;
After add a item value is ok look at first B vardump which is on the end
of the script.
No variable $count is mandatory so that is defined.
But its not main idea of my question...
Function add items correctly, but if go to next page, values in array
change. Values are changed passing from one page to another one, why and
where?
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next
page count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned on, you would see that you are
using an undefined variable in your method called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the
resulting value (which would always be zero) to $count.
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next page
count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(4)
} } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]= int(4)
} }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in array_key_exist?
Jim Lucas napsal(a):
Korgan wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with array_key_exists in if statement.
I have a class with this function
class XXX {
private items = array();
...
...
...
public function addXXX($id, $count)
{
$count = (int)$cout;
Let me point at it
Check your spelling
If error_reporting was set to E_ALL AND display_errors were turned on,
you would see that you are using an undefined variable in your method
called $cout, casting is as an int and assigning the resulting value
(which would always be zero) to $count.
No variable $count is mandatory so that is defined.
But its not main idea of my question...
Function add items correctly, but if go to next page, values in array
change. Values are changed passing from one page to another one, why and
where?
if (!array_key_exists($id, $this-items))
$this-items[$id] = $count;
else
$this-items[$id] += $count;
}
...
...
}
And I want to send instance of this class with SESSION.
If I add a item to the array, count is ok, but if i go to the next
page count will change.
There is the code of index.php
/** its loading classes ***/
spl_autoload_register('loadClass');
session_start();
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** A **/
...
...
...
if ($_SESSION['XX'] instanceof XXX)
$x = $_SESSION['XX'];
else
new...
..
..
/** Do onzl this **/
if
$x-addXXX($id, $cnt);
...
...
$_SESSION['XX'] = X;
var_dump($_SESSION['XX']); /** B **/
There is a vardump if action addXXX exec:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(0) { } }
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(1) } }
And than i will go to some page and vardums are:
A:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } } 1 : 4
B:
object(Kosik)#1 (1) { [zbozi:private]= array(1) { [1]=
int(4) } }
I am thinking that do both codes in if statement,
but $this-items[$id] += $count; exec after send page.
I am using PHP Version 5.2.6 and Smarty v.2.6.19
Thanks for help :)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in SimpleXML?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Kyle Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was working on a project for XML Parsing. I came across instances where my elements were completely missing. After further Digging into the issue, I found out, that when placing tags inside of an element with text, SimpleXML (and dom Document) ignore the added tags, and the text within. thats a known limitation. i have written a workaround in some code for a personal project, but it cant be great for performance. anyway, another option is to use DOM. ---output- SimpleXMLElement Object ( [Article] = SimpleXMLElement Object ( [Title] = Is Your Face on Facebook? [Subtitle] = Employ simple strategies to market your ?profile? using online social networking. [Body] = Temp Testing Example of SimpleXML Bug. [Folio] = Trying to just show Examples ) ) are you using print_r() or var_dump() to generate this output? fyi, those are explicitly not supported by simplexml. -nathan
Re: [PHP] Bug in SimpleXML?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Kyle Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used both print_r and var_dump. Whats supported for ultimate nesting prints of values and keys?, or in objects words, properties and values. cc'ng the list again.. well var_dump() and print_r() just arent supported for simplexml, per the manual, http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.simplexml-element-attributes.php *Note*: SimpleXML has made a rule of adding iterative properties to most methods. They cannot be viewed using var_dump()http://php.oregonstate.edu/manual/en/function.var-dump.phpor anything else which can examine objects. basically, youre best bet w/ simplexml is asXML() ;) -nathan
Re: [PHP] Bug with passing objects by reference and assigning a defeault null?
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 12:19 -0400, Shu Chow wrote:
Has anyone tried to assign a default value of null for an object passed
by reference in PHP4?
Let's say I had this code:
$mObj = new testModel();
$mObj-msg = Bubba;
testFunc();
class testModel {
var $msg;
}
function testFunc($msg=null) {
echo $msg-msg;
}
Under PHP5, this works fine.
Under PHP4, the = will cause an error: Parse error: syntax error,
unexpected '=', expecting ')'. Removing the in the parameter
definition makes it work. I'm using 4.4.2 right now, but don't see
anything in the later change logs that say this was fixed. I also don't
find any mention of it in the bugs list. Is this a legit bug or am I
committing a big no-no?
Not a bug, it's a limitation of PHP4.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`'
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug? (_ENV in PHP v5.2.0)
Hi Eli,
Check variable_order in php.ini
(http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.variables-order) if the E is
missing you will not get any environment variables.
- Frank
Hi,
System:
Win32
PHP 5.2.0
Apache 2.0.54 (PHP in CGI mode)
CGI vars are not automatically loaded into $_ENV global array. Only when
calling getenv('var'), just then the variable appears in $_ENV.
Besides, it seems that the env vars are loaded automatically into
$_SERVER. And $HTTP_ENV_VARS is always NULL.
?php
echo before getenv...;
echo br\$_ENV: ; var_dump($_ENV);
echo br\$HTTP_ENV_VARS: ; var_dump($HTTP_ENV_VARS);
getenv('SERVER_PROTOCOL');
echo hrafter getenv...;
echo br\$_ENV: ; var_dump($_ENV);
echo br\$HTTP_ENV_VARS: ; var_dump($HTTP_ENV_VARS);
?
=== output:
before getenv...
$_ENV: array(0) { }
$HTTP_ENV_VARS: NULL
after getenv...
$_ENV: array(1) { [SERVER_PROTOCOL]= string(8) HTTP/1.1 }
$HTTP_ENV_VARS: NULL
Is it a bug? Or this is the way it should work?
-thanks, Eli
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug? (_ENV in PHP v5.2.0)
Frank M. Kromann wrote: Hi Eli, Check variable_order in php.ini (http://us2.php.net/manual/en/ini.core.php#ini.variables-order) if the E is missing you will not get any environment variables. - Frank Thanks, Frank.. That worked! :-) -thanks, Eli -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in php 5.1.4
There must be a special code in your script that causes it like this bug: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=37926 on Friday 30 June 2006 11:39, Alain Roger wrote: Hi, I' ve discovered a bug in PHP 5.1.4. This version of PHP create a new session everytime you refresh the same php page or that you switch from 1 page to another page. I downgraded it to PHP 5.1.2 and it works correctly. It could be interesting to fix this bug. if you want moredetail, contact me. Alain -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in php 5.1.4
Alain Roger wrote: Hi, I' ve discovered a bug in PHP 5.1.4. This version of PHP create a new session everytime you refresh the same php page or that you switch from 1 page to another page. I downgraded it to PHP 5.1.2 and it works correctly. It could be interesting to fix this bug. if it is a bug it sounds like it's rather critical! if you want moredetail, contact me. you might want to post a small repro script to internals to illustrate the problem... if you do you better off asking if it is a bug rather than declaring it to be so. chances are that you'll be asked to make a report at bugs.php.net if someone sees merit in your observation. Alain -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug madness
Have you tried? error_reporting(E_ALL^E_NOTICE); Jeremy Schreckhise, M.B.A. -Original Message- From: Dave Goodchild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:37 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] Bug madness Hi all, I have been mashing my head trying to debug a web app I have written, the deadline is tomorrow and after implementing some changes a subtle and difficult-to-pin-down bug has emerged. I am not going to include code as there is too much of it, but here is the general issue: The app consists of three linked forms and three modules that process the data passed in from the forms. All was sweet and perfect before today. The forms are self-reloading, and after the data is checked, validated and entered into the database the form is supposed to display a thank you section. As part of the processing process (!), the scripts assemble and send multipart mails to the entrants. Now, when I submit the forms, I see a blank page - nothing, no html, no error messages. I have added debugging functions at each point to track the logic and they inform me that the processing functions get to the end (where the mails are sent) where they should return to the caller (ie the form). This does not happen. I have display_errors enabled and cannot seem to locate the source of this issue. Ambiguous I know, but it may be a recognisable issue to many of you, in which case any advice would be greatly appreciated. I am extremely calm. -- http://www.web-buddha.co.uk dynamic web programming from Reigate, Surrey UK (php, mysql, xhtml, css) look out for project karma, our new venture, coming soon! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug madness
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 10:48 -0500, Jeremy Schreckhise wrote: Have you tried? error_reporting(E_ALL^E_NOTICE); Surely you mean error_reporting(E_ALL);? If one of my team members ships code that does not pass through on E_ALL (or E_STRICT), they get a beating. Now, back to the problem at hand... Are you 100% certain that your sendmail binary is available and the correct path set? I presume you are using the native mail() function? Thats probably where you are having issues. Also your script may be timing out because sendmail can't resolve a FQDN or something? --Paul -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug Apache/PHP/Oracle on Debian
David BERCOT wrote: Hi, I have a server with Apache 2, PHP 5.1.1 and Oracle Instant Client 10.2.0.1. As I have a little bug [http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29779], I've tried the solution (in oci8.c) and recompiled ! But then, everything was broken. So, I get the source of PHP 5.1.2 and recompiled again. Everything seems ok, with Apache and PHP, but it was impossible to use oci !!! I thought about an environment problem (LD_LIBRARY_PATH), but after some manipulations, I can see this variable in phpinfo(), but nothing about oci8 !!! I've looked into logs but I couldn't find any problem. It was like Oracle was not installed !!! You might be better off asking the internals list. http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php They deal with this sort of stuff, we're more for general php help.. -- Postgresql php tutorials http://www.designmagick.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug??
for($i=1;$i13;$i++) {
echo $i . :: ;
echo date('F', mktime(0, 0, 0, $i)) . :: ;
echo mktime(0, 0, 0, $i) . \n;
}
1 :: January :: 1107061200
2 :: March :: 1109739600
3 :: March :: 1112158800
Today is the 30th (in some parts of the world, anyway). mktime fills
in the current time is no argument is provided. So for Feb, the
equivalent is
mktime(0, 0, 0, 2, 30, 2005, true);
And the 30th day of Feb, 2005 is March 2nd.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug or programmer-error?
Rob Ziere wrote: Dear PHP_friends, I have found a strange behaviour of the include function. Here it is . // 1. this works fine include (../../gps_info/fetch_fields.php); // 2. this works fine $doc_root=$_SERVER[DOCUMENT_ROOT]; include ($doc_root./pages/gps_info/fetch_fields.php); // 3. this open the doc fetch_fields.php allright, but variables that have been set outside fetchfields.php are not available within fetch_fields.php You could try calling a var with global first global $variable (reference: http://nl2.php.net/global ) $root= 'webserver-2'; include ($root./pages/gps_info/fetch_fields.php); Does anybody have a clou as to what's wrong here? Best regards/ Met vriendelijke groet, Rob Ziere Webmaster/beheerder GO-GPS.nl, alles over GPS en wandelen http://www.go-gps.nl -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing;downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
Hi,
There is not a big speed difference between the two.
The only thing is that it was frustrating to find out the limitations
on readfile.
I used it before with large files and it was ok; only to find out now
that on 5.0.4 it doesn't work as it used to.
As php manual states readfile should be the way to spit a file out
the wire.
btw:
$fp = fopen('somefile');
fpassthru($fp);
is also stopping at 2.000.000 bytes, which definetely drives me
to think there is a bug somewhere.
Catalin
Richard Lynch wrote:
On Thu, June 9, 2005 4:12 pm, Catalin Trifu said:
Tried it and it works indeed, but it's quite annoying to make such
tricks
and is not the best solution either; fopen and fread are expensive.
I can't say if it's a bug in PHP or some config option.
You may want to benchmark the difference between readfile and fopen/fread
for a 1.9M file.
If it ain't much, don't worry about it.
One posible work-around:
`cat filename`;
This MIGHT be cheaper than fopen/fread -- Or not, since it has to build a
shell of some kind, I think.
PS File a bug report, if you haven't already.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
Hi,
It can't be a memory limit problem. The server ha 2GB memory,
and in PHP each script can consume up to 64MB. On php4, apache 1.3 and
same configs readfile works without fread tricks.
C.
Rory Browne wrote:
It's probably something to do with maximum memory, or something like
that, but taking into account that your method is stretching the
resources, fopen/fread may be a better solution.
I'd be curious to see the benchmarked differences - but couldn't be
bothered at this minute doing the benchmarking atm.
On 6/10/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tried it and it works indeed, but it's quite annoying to make such tricks
and is not the best solution either; fopen and fread are expensive.
I can't say if it's a bug in PHP or some config option.
C.
Rory Browne wrote:
I've never came across that problem, but try this
function output_file($filename){
$fp = fopen($filename, r);
while(!feof($fp)){
echo fread($fp, 1024000);
}
}
On 6/9/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I installed php5 using the configue below. I tried with apache2 as well
and same things.
'./configure' '--prefix=/usr/local/php5'
'--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' '--disable-cgi'
'--with-config-file-path=/etc/php5' '--with-dom' '--with-gd'
'--enable-sockets' '--enable-exif'
'--with-freetype2' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/include/freetype2'
'--enable-gd-native-ttf'
'--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--with-curl' '--with-curlwrappers' '--enable-ftp'
'--with-mysql=/usr'
'--with-xsl' '--with-libxml-dir=/usr'
I have a script which generates a temporary catalog file, which is
generated correctly having
4.7MB on disk.
Then I push up the wire with readfile($filname):
header(Content-Type: text/csv);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=somfilename.csv);
header(Content-Length: . filesize($file));
readfile($file);
I also tried with fopen.
If I try to download the file directly from apache it works, all 4.7MB
are received.
As expected the browser starts the download and reports it is expecting a
file of 4.7MB.
However, the download stops at 2.000.000 bytes no matter what browser I
use (normally i use
Firefox on Linux), no matter if php runs on apache2 or apache1.3
Is there some php config option I missed ?
Could this be from curlwrappers ?
Where could this come from ?
Thanks,
Catalin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
Check out the readfile manual page. Someone made a user-contributed
comment about that.
As it happens they came up with pretty much the same solution as I did.
On 6/10/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It can't be a memory limit problem. The server ha 2GB memory,
and in PHP each script can consume up to 64MB. On php4, apache 1.3 and
same configs readfile works without fread tricks.
C.
Rory Browne wrote:
It's probably something to do with maximum memory, or something like
that, but taking into account that your method is stretching the
resources, fopen/fread may be a better solution.
I'd be curious to see the benchmarked differences - but couldn't be
bothered at this minute doing the benchmarking atm.
On 6/10/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tried it and it works indeed, but it's quite annoying to make such tricks
and is not the best solution either; fopen and fread are expensive.
I can't say if it's a bug in PHP or some config option.
C.
Rory Browne wrote:
I've never came across that problem, but try this
function output_file($filename){
$fp = fopen($filename, r);
while(!feof($fp)){
echo fread($fp, 1024000);
}
}
On 6/9/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I installed php5 using the configue below. I tried with apache2 as well
and same things.
'./configure' '--prefix=/usr/local/php5'
'--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' '--disable-cgi'
'--with-config-file-path=/etc/php5' '--with-dom' '--with-gd'
'--enable-sockets' '--enable-exif'
'--with-freetype2' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/include/freetype2'
'--enable-gd-native-ttf'
'--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--with-curl' '--with-curlwrappers' '--enable-ftp'
'--with-mysql=/usr'
'--with-xsl' '--with-libxml-dir=/usr'
I have a script which generates a temporary catalog file, which is
generated correctly having
4.7MB on disk.
Then I push up the wire with readfile($filname):
header(Content-Type: text/csv);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=somfilename.csv);
header(Content-Length: . filesize($file));
readfile($file);
I also tried with fopen.
If I try to download the file directly from apache it works, all 4.7MB
are received.
As expected the browser starts the download and reports it is expecting
a file of 4.7MB.
However, the download stops at 2.000.000 bytes no matter what browser I
use (normally i use
Firefox on Linux), no matter if php runs on apache2 or apache1.3
Is there some php config option I missed ?
Could this be from curlwrappers ?
Where could this come from ?
Thanks,
Catalin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
Didn't really follow this thread, but it sounds to me like you have upload_max_filesize = 2M which also happens to be the default uploaded filesize limit. -Rasmus Catalin Trifu wrote: Hi, It can't be a memory limit problem. The server ha 2GB memory, and in PHP each script can consume up to 64MB. On php4, apache 1.3 and same configs readfile works without fread tricks. C. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
Uh, never mind. I guess I should read the thread. You are downloading, not uploading. I can't think of anything that would put an exact limit on the download like that. -Rasmus Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: Didn't really follow this thread, but it sounds to me like you have upload_max_filesize = 2M which also happens to be the default uploaded filesize limit. -Rasmus Catalin Trifu wrote: Hi, It can't be a memory limit problem. The server ha 2GB memory, and in PHP each script can consume up to 64MB. On php4, apache 1.3 and same configs readfile works without fread tricks. C. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
On Thu, June 9, 2005 4:12 pm, Catalin Trifu said: Tried it and it works indeed, but it's quite annoying to make such tricks and is not the best solution either; fopen and fread are expensive. I can't say if it's a bug in PHP or some config option. You may want to benchmark the difference between readfile and fopen/fread for a 1.9M file. If it ain't much, don't worry about it. One posible work-around: `cat filename`; This MIGHT be cheaper than fopen/fread -- Or not, since it has to build a shell of some kind, I think. PS File a bug report, if you haven't already. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
I've never came across that problem, but try this
function output_file($filename){
$fp = fopen($filename, r);
while(!feof($fp)){
echo fread($fp, 1024000);
}
}
On 6/9/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I installed php5 using the configue below. I tried with apache2 as well
and same things.
'./configure' '--prefix=/usr/local/php5'
'--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' '--disable-cgi'
'--with-config-file-path=/etc/php5' '--with-dom' '--with-gd'
'--enable-sockets' '--enable-exif'
'--with-freetype2' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/include/freetype2'
'--enable-gd-native-ttf'
'--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--with-curl' '--with-curlwrappers' '--enable-ftp'
'--with-mysql=/usr'
'--with-xsl' '--with-libxml-dir=/usr'
I have a script which generates a temporary catalog file, which is
generated correctly having
4.7MB on disk.
Then I push up the wire with readfile($filname):
header(Content-Type: text/csv);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=somfilename.csv);
header(Content-Length: . filesize($file));
readfile($file);
I also tried with fopen.
If I try to download the file directly from apache it works, all 4.7MB are
received.
As expected the browser starts the download and reports it is expecting a
file of 4.7MB.
However, the download stops at 2.000.000 bytes no matter what browser I
use (normally i use
Firefox on Linux), no matter if php runs on apache2 or apache1.3
Is there some php config option I missed ?
Could this be from curlwrappers ?
Where could this come from ?
Thanks,
Catalin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
Hi,
Tried it and it works indeed, but it's quite annoying to make such tricks
and is not the best solution either; fopen and fread are expensive.
I can't say if it's a bug in PHP or some config option.
C.
Rory Browne wrote:
I've never came across that problem, but try this
function output_file($filename){
$fp = fopen($filename, r);
while(!feof($fp)){
echo fread($fp, 1024000);
}
}
On 6/9/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I installed php5 using the configue below. I tried with apache2 as well
and same things.
'./configure' '--prefix=/usr/local/php5'
'--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' '--disable-cgi'
'--with-config-file-path=/etc/php5' '--with-dom' '--with-gd'
'--enable-sockets' '--enable-exif'
'--with-freetype2' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/include/freetype2'
'--enable-gd-native-ttf'
'--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--with-curl' '--with-curlwrappers' '--enable-ftp'
'--with-mysql=/usr'
'--with-xsl' '--with-libxml-dir=/usr'
I have a script which generates a temporary catalog file, which is
generated correctly having
4.7MB on disk.
Then I push up the wire with readfile($filname):
header(Content-Type: text/csv);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=somfilename.csv);
header(Content-Length: . filesize($file));
readfile($file);
I also tried with fopen.
If I try to download the file directly from apache it works, all 4.7MB are
received.
As expected the browser starts the download and reports it is expecting a
file of 4.7MB.
However, the download stops at 2.000.000 bytes no matter what browser I
use (normally i use
Firefox on Linux), no matter if php runs on apache2 or apache1.3
Is there some php config option I missed ?
Could this be from curlwrappers ?
Where could this come from ?
Thanks,
Catalin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [? BUG ?] weird thing; downloading from a php script stops at exactly 2.000.000 bytes
It's probably something to do with maximum memory, or something like
that, but taking into account that your method is stretching the
resources, fopen/fread may be a better solution.
I'd be curious to see the benchmarked differences - but couldn't be
bothered at this minute doing the benchmarking atm.
On 6/10/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tried it and it works indeed, but it's quite annoying to make such tricks
and is not the best solution either; fopen and fread are expensive.
I can't say if it's a bug in PHP or some config option.
C.
Rory Browne wrote:
I've never came across that problem, but try this
function output_file($filename){
$fp = fopen($filename, r);
while(!feof($fp)){
echo fread($fp, 1024000);
}
}
On 6/9/05, Catalin Trifu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I installed php5 using the configue below. I tried with apache2 as well
and same things.
'./configure' '--prefix=/usr/local/php5'
'--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' '--disable-cgi'
'--with-config-file-path=/etc/php5' '--with-dom' '--with-gd'
'--enable-sockets' '--enable-exif'
'--with-freetype2' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/include/freetype2'
'--enable-gd-native-ttf'
'--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--with-curl' '--with-curlwrappers' '--enable-ftp'
'--with-mysql=/usr'
'--with-xsl' '--with-libxml-dir=/usr'
I have a script which generates a temporary catalog file, which is
generated correctly having
4.7MB on disk.
Then I push up the wire with readfile($filname):
header(Content-Type: text/csv);
header(Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=somfilename.csv);
header(Content-Length: . filesize($file));
readfile($file);
I also tried with fopen.
If I try to download the file directly from apache it works, all 4.7MB
are received.
As expected the browser starts the download and reports it is expecting
a file of 4.7MB.
However, the download stops at 2.000.000 bytes no matter what browser I
use (normally i use
Firefox on Linux), no matter if php runs on apache2 or apache1.3
Is there some php config option I missed ?
Could this be from curlwrappers ?
Where could this come from ?
Thanks,
Catalin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP bug within multi. dimensional arrays?
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
I am outputting an multidim. array. That works fine, except one thing. The first
letter of the value inside dimension 1 always gets printed.
For example:
I fill the arrays:
while ($row = mysql_fetch_object($result)){
$cat[$row-main_id][name]= $row-main_name;
$cat[$row-main_id][$row-sub_id][name] = $row-sub_name;
}
First off, if you're creating associative arrays, you should quote the
keys:
$cat[$row-main_id]['name'] = $row-main_name;
If you don't do so, PHP assumes you're using a constant value for the
key name.
Then I output them:
foreach ($cat AS $maincat){
echo $maincat[name].':';
Quote your keys!
foreach($maincat AS $subcat){
You do realize that the above will also loop over the index 'name',
right?...
echo $subcat[name].$br;
and since it does, the first element in that array is 'name', which
isn't an array, but a string. Since the 'name' constant isn't defined,
it will interpret that as 'true', or 1, and so it takes the first
character of that string.
I think you'll find the 'name' constant evaluates to FALSE, which in turn
casts to zero, which will give you the first element of the given array,
but as you pointed out its a string not an array so you get the first
char (because php allows array-like access to the individual chars in
a string) ... if it had evaluated to TRUE you would be getting the second
char.
the rest of your explaination is spot on.
}
echo $br;
}
Which does result in:
Europe:E
Germany
UK
North America:N
US
CA
As you can see I get the extra letters N and E. Is this an php error or did I do
something wrong?
So, what you should probably do is create an additional layer in your
multi-dimensional array for the subcategories, and have it of the form
sub_id = sub_name:
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id] = $row-sub_name;
Then loop over that:
foreach ($cat as $main_cat) {
echo $maincat['name'] . :\n;
foreach ($maincat['subs'] as $sub_id = $sub_name) {
echo $sub_name$br; // could also use $sub_id here if
// desired
}
}
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP bug within multi. dimensional arrays?
* Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
I am outputting an multidim. array. That works fine, except one thing. The
first
letter of the value inside dimension 1 always gets printed.
For example:
I fill the arrays:
while ($row = mysql_fetch_object($result)){
$cat[$row-main_id][name] = $row-main_name;
$cat[$row-main_id][$row-sub_id][name] = $row-sub_name;
}
First off, if you're creating associative arrays, you should quote the
keys:
$cat[$row-main_id]['name'] = $row-main_name;
If you don't do so, PHP assumes you're using a constant value for the
key name.
Then I output them:
foreach ($cat AS $maincat){
echo $maincat[name].':';
Quote your keys!
foreach($maincat AS $subcat){
You do realize that the above will also loop over the index 'name',
right?...
echo $subcat[name].$br;
and since it does, the first element in that array is 'name', which
isn't an array, but a string. Since the 'name' constant isn't defined,
it will interpret that as 'true', or 1, and so it takes the first
character of that string.
}
echo $br;
}
Which does result in:
Europe:E
Germany
UK
North America:N
US
CA
As you can see I get the extra letters N and E. Is this an php error or did I
do
something wrong?
So, what you should probably do is create an additional layer in your
multi-dimensional array for the subcategories, and have it of the form
sub_id = sub_name:
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id] = $row-sub_name;
Then loop over that:
foreach ($cat as $main_cat) {
echo $maincat['name'] . :\n;
foreach ($maincat['subs'] as $sub_id = $sub_name) {
echo $sub_name$br; // could also use $sub_id here if
// desired
}
}
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney | WEBSITES:
Webmaster and IT Specialist | http://www.garden.org
National Gardening Association| http://www.kidsgardening.com
802-863-5251 x156 | http://nationalgardenmonth.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://vermontbotanical.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP bug within multi. dimensional arrays?
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
I am outputting an multidim. array. That works fine, except one thing. The first
letter of the value inside dimension 1 always gets printed.
For example:
I fill the arrays:
while ($row = mysql_fetch_object($result)){
$cat[$row-main_id][name]= $row-main_name;
$cat[$row-main_id][$row-sub_id][name] = $row-sub_name;
}
First off, if you're creating associative arrays, you should quote the
keys:
$cat[$row-main_id]['name'] = $row-main_name;
If you don't do so, PHP assumes you're using a constant value for the
key name.
Then I output them:
foreach ($cat AS $maincat){
echo $maincat[name].':';
Quote your keys!
foreach($maincat AS $subcat){
You do realize that the above will also loop over the index 'name',
right?...
echo $subcat[name].$br;
and since it does, the first element in that array is 'name', which
isn't an array, but a string. Since the 'name' constant isn't defined,
it will interpret that as 'true', or 1, and so it takes the first
character of that string.
}
echo $br;
}
Which does result in:
Europe:E
Germany
UK
North America:N
US
CA
As you can see I get the extra letters N and E. Is this an php error or did I do
something wrong?
So, what you should probably do is create an additional layer in your
multi-dimensional array for the subcategories, and have it of the form
sub_id = sub_name:
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id] = $row-sub_name;
Then loop over that:
foreach ($cat as $main_cat) {
echo $maincat['name'] . :\n;
foreach ($maincat['subs'] as $sub_id = $sub_name) {
echo $sub_name$br; // could also use $sub_id here if
// desired
}
}
This is very helpful and does work. However I did not understand it completley.
What if I want to add another value, for example name2 or name3.
It looks like this example is limited to id and name.
Could I just add:
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id] = $row-name2;
Guess not. Can you tell me how to add other fields to the array?
Thank you in advance, Merlin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP bug within multi. dimensional arrays?
* Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Merlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I am outputting an multidim. array. That works fine, except one thing.
The first
letter of the value inside dimension 1 always gets printed.
For example:
I fill the arrays:
while ($row = mysql_fetch_object($result)){
$cat[$row- main_id][name] = $row- main_name;
$cat[$row- main_id][$row- sub_id][name] = $row- sub_name;
}
First off, if you're creating associative arrays, you should quote the
keys:
$cat[$row- main_id]['name'] = $row- main_name;
If you don't do so, PHP assumes you're using a constant value for the
key name.
Then I output them:
foreach ($cat AS $maincat){
echo $maincat[name].':';
Quote your keys!
foreach($maincat AS $subcat){
You do realize that the above will also loop over the index 'name',
right?...
echo $subcat[name].$br;
and since it does, the first element in that array is 'name', which
isn't an array, but a string. Since the 'name' constant isn't defined,
it will interpret that as 'true', or 1, and so it takes the first
character of that string.
}
echo $br;
}
Which does result in:
Europe:E
Germany
UK
North America:N
US
CA
As you can see I get the extra letters N and E. Is this an php error or
did I do
something wrong?
So, what you should probably do is create an additional layer in your
multi-dimensional array for the subcategories, and have it of the form
sub_id = sub_name:
$cat[$row- main_id]['subs'][$row- sub_id] = $row- sub_name;
Then loop over that:
foreach ($cat as $main_cat) {
echo $maincat['name'] . :\n;
foreach ($maincat['subs'] as $sub_id = $sub_name) {
echo $sub_name$br; // could also use $sub_id here if
// desired
}
}
This is very helpful and does work. However I did not understand it
completley.
What if I want to add another value, for example name2 or name3.
It looks like this example is limited to id and name.
Could I just add:
$cat[$row- main_id]['subs'][$row- sub_id] = $row- name2;
Guess not. Can you tell me how to add other fields to the array?
You should probably do some studying up on multidimensional and/or
nested arrays so you can get a better handle on this stuff.
If you need to be able to add multiple names for a sub_id, do it as an
array:
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id][] = $row-name1;
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id][] = $row-name2;
$cat[$row-main_id]['subs'][$row-sub_id][] = $row-name3;
However, this will break your loop above -- you'll need another layer of
looping added in:
foreach ($cat as $main_cat) {
echo $maincat['name'] . :\n;
foreach ($maincat['subs'] as $sub_id = $names) {
foreach ($names as $name) {
echo $name$br; // could also use $sub_id here if
// desired
}
}
}
Hope that helps.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney | WEBSITES:
Webmaster and IT Specialist | http://www.garden.org
National Gardening Association| http://www.kidsgardening.com
802-863-5251 x156 | http://nationalgardenmonth.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://vermontbotanical.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug in look-behind assertions in PCRE patterns ?
Ian Thurlbeck wrote:
Dear All
Is this a bug ?
[...]
$line = '$res = $bar(ddd, dfdf);';
if (preg_match(/(?!\$)(bar)/, $line, $matches)) {
echo Should NOT match \$bar, but found: .$matches[1];
}
In the first preg_match() is correctly ignores the foobar
function name. However the second preg_match() does NOT
ignore the $bar as I expected.
This is a quoting issue. Above you are using double quotes, which interpolates
embedded PHP variables. Therefore if you want a literal $ inside a
double-quoted
string you have to escape it, as you have done. However, the $ character is
ALSO
a preg metacharacter (matches end of line). This means that you must also
escape it
for the preg parser as well, so you need to escape it twice, by putting another
literal backslash behind it:
if (preg_match(/(?!\\\$)(bar)/, $line, $matches)) {
Either that or you can use single quotes instead of double quotes:
if (preg_match('/(?!\$)(bar)/', $line, $matches)) {
Either one will work.
HTH
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in str_split function?
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:07:34 -0600, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $test2=str_split($test); Do echo 'pre'; print_r( $test2 ); right here and see if the $test2 array has the data you expect. -- Greg Donald Zend Certified Engineer http://destiney.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in str_split function?
No good.
I made the change to this (note the echo ping statements)
/// start
?PHP
$test='this is test';
echo $test;
echo 'brping 1br';
$test2=str_split($test);
echo 'ping 2br';
echo 'pre';
for($i=0;$icount($test2);$i++)
{
print_r($test2[$i]);
}
echo '/pre';
?
/// end
result is now
/
this is test
ping 1
/
Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:07:34 -0600, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$test2=str_split($test);
Do echo 'pre'; print_r( $test2 ); right here and see if the $test2
array has the data you expect.
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://destiney.com/
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.817 / Virus Database: 555 - Release Date: 12/15/2004
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in str_split function?
chris wrote:
No good.
this should work, I rewrote you little test and no probs (as expected):
php -r '
$test = this is test;
echo $test,\n;
$test2 = str_split($test);
foreach($test2 as $s) {
echo $s.\n;
}
'
I made the change to this (note the echo ping statements)
/// start
?PHP
$test='this is test';
echo $test;
echo 'brping 1br';
$test2=str_split($test);
long shot: try specifying the second param to str_split()
e.g.:
$test2=str_split($test,1);
if that doesn't do it you can probably consider you php install borked -
in which case reinstall!
echo 'ping 2br';
echo 'pre';
for($i=0;$icount($test2);$i++)
while we're at it - don't put the count statement inside the loop, they
way you have it now count() gets called on every iteration - thats
wasteful. also notice the foreach syntax I used above, it will save to
time in typing :-) (I believe its faster for simple array iteration as
well - anyone care to correct?)
{
print_r($test2[$i]);
}
echo '/pre';
?
/// end
result is now
/
this is test
ping 1
/
Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:07:34 -0600, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$test2=str_split($test);
Do echo 'pre'; print_r( $test2 ); right here and see if the $test2
array has the data you expect.
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://destiney.com/
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.817 / Virus Database: 555 - Release Date: 12/15/2004
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in str_split function?
Still no goodI get the first echo but nothing after it.
:^(
What bothers me about this whole thing is the original code was working
fine.
It was only today that this issue arose, when I was making documentation on
my code.
Now, all of a sudden, it no longer works. After stepping through my code I
was able to
isolate it to this function. I have not changed any of my settings, but then
again other
people do have to my computer. But I could not think of anything that would
just shutdown
a single function and not other too
If I can not get this resolve I will just make a work around
Chris
Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris wrote:
No good.
this should work, I rewrote you little test and no probs (as expected):
php -r '
$test = this is test;
echo $test,\n;
$test2 = str_split($test);
foreach($test2 as $s) {
echo $s.\n;
}
'
I made the change to this (note the echo ping statements)
/// start
?PHP
$test='this is test';
echo $test;
echo 'brping 1br';
$test2=str_split($test);
long shot: try specifying the second param to str_split()
e.g.:
$test2=str_split($test,1);
if that doesn't do it you can probably consider you php install borked -
in which case reinstall!
echo 'ping 2br';
echo 'pre';
for($i=0;$icount($test2);$i++)
while we're at it - don't put the count statement inside the loop, they
way you have it now count() gets called on every iteration - thats
wasteful. also notice the foreach syntax I used above, it will save to
time in typing :-) (I believe its faster for simple array iteration as
well - anyone care to correct?)
{
print_r($test2[$i]);
}
echo '/pre';
?
/// end
result is now
/
this is test
ping 1
/
Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:07:34 -0600, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$test2=str_split($test);
Do echo 'pre'; print_r( $test2 ); right here and see if the $test2
array has the data you expect.
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://destiney.com/
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.817 / Virus Database: 555 - Release Date: 12/15/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.817 / Virus Database: 555 - Release Date: 12/15/2004
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in str_split function?
chris wrote:
No good.
I made the change to this (note the echo ping statements)
/// start
?PHP
$test='this is test';
echo $test;
echo 'brping 1br';
$test2=str_split($test);
echo 'ping 2br';
echo 'pre';
for($i=0;$icount($test2);$i++)
{
print_r($test2[$i]);
}
echo '/pre';
?
/// end
result is now
/
this is test
ping 1
/
Most rational explanation:
Fact 1: str_split is only available in PHP 5, according to TFM.
Fact 2: It's *POSSIBLE* to set up error_reporting/error_log to not appear
in the browser.
Hypothesis: You have an error message going somewhere telling you that
str_split is not a defined function, because you are running PHP 4 (or PHP
3, or even PHP 2, in theory)...
Lab Test: Does ?php phpinfo();? say you are running PHP 5?
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in str_split function?
Thanks to Richard who pointed me in the right direction. I failed to notice
that the str_split function is only for use with php v5, I was run
4.3.10...DOH!
In case anyone what the solution here is a rewrite.
?PHP
$test='this is test';
$test2=Array();
echo $test;
echo 'brping 1br';
$strSize=strlen($test);
for($i=0;$i$strSize;$i++)
{
array_push($test2,$test[$i]);
}
echo 'ping 2br';
for($i=0;$i$strSize;$i++)
{
echo $test2[$i].'br';
}
?
This will correctly produce
this is test
ping 1
ping 2
t
h
i
s
i
s
t
e
s
t
Jochem, thanks for pointing out the count inside the loop issue. This is a
good point to remember...
Thank,
Chris
Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris wrote:
No good.
this should work, I rewrote you little test and no probs (as expected):
php -r '
$test = this is test;
echo $test,\n;
$test2 = str_split($test);
foreach($test2 as $s) {
echo $s.\n;
}
'
I made the change to this (note the echo ping statements)
/// start
?PHP
$test='this is test';
echo $test;
echo 'brping 1br';
$test2=str_split($test);
long shot: try specifying the second param to str_split()
e.g.:
$test2=str_split($test,1);
if that doesn't do it you can probably consider you php install borked -
in which case reinstall!
echo 'ping 2br';
echo 'pre';
for($i=0;$icount($test2);$i++)
while we're at it - don't put the count statement inside the loop, they
way you have it now count() gets called on every iteration - thats
wasteful. also notice the foreach syntax I used above, it will save to
time in typing :-) (I believe its faster for simple array iteration as
well - anyone care to correct?)
{
print_r($test2[$i]);
}
echo '/pre';
?
/// end
result is now
/
this is test
ping 1
/
Greg Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:07:34 -0600, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$test2=str_split($test);
Do echo 'pre'; print_r( $test2 ); right here and see if the $test2
array has the data you expect.
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://destiney.com/
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.817 / Virus Database: 555 - Release Date: 12/15/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.817 / Virus Database: 555 - Release Date: 12/15/2004
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug-Tracking-System in PHP ?
Dunno if this is ok: http://www.mantisbt.org/ -Original Message- From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 29 oktober 2004 5:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] Bug-Tracking-System in PHP ? Hello, Curently I create my website and I need for my development project a BTS like this one from bugs.debian.org. I have only around 20 Debian Packages, so I do not need a big one of BTS. Curently I use E-Mails from my Provider like: package[EMAIL PROTECTED] with procmail and some BASH scripts :-) Does anyone know a better solution in PHP4 ? Maybe Webinterface included ? The BASH scripts are working fine, but they are too heavy Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug? ... ? ? and commenting them out
From: Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] i've the dump feeling there's a bug in the parser (or in my mind =) since i tried to commenting out some code, containing ? ... ?. http://us4.php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.comments.php Quote:The one-line comment styles actually only comment to the end of the line or the current block of PHP code, whichever comes first. This means that HTML code after // ? WILL be printed: ? skips out of the PHP mode and returns to HTML mode, and // cannot influence that. If asp_tags configuration directive is enabled, it behaves the same with // %. Although maybe it should say even if ? is within a string to clear up any confusion? ---John Holmes... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug with mktime??
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 05:53, John Clegg wrote:
I have been using mktime() to determine the next 12 months for a
program, and i have discovered what seems a bug in the function.
The following code...
?php
for($i=0;$i 12;$i++){
$currentDate = date(d m Y,mktime(0, 0, 0,date(m)+$i , date(d),
Try using date('n'). Leading zeros are interpreted in octal.
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems Integrators
* Web Design Hosting * Internet Intranet Applications Development *
--
Search the list archives before you post
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general
--
/*
You don't have to be nice to people on the way up if you're not planning on
coming back down.
-- Oliver Warbucks, Annie
*/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug with mktime??
gives the following output:
$i : Month: Year
0 : 08 : 2004
1 : 10 : 2004
2 : 10 : 2004
3 : 12 : 2004
4 : 12 : 2004
5 : 01 : 2005
6 : 03 : 2005
7 : 03 : 2005
8 : 05 : 2005
9 : 05 : 2005
10 : 07 : 2005
11 : 07 : 2005
Your bug is being caused by short months. If you ask mktime() to give
you the 31st day of november, it will assume you mean the 1st of
december. You can see more clearly what's going on if you shorten your
code, like so:
for($i=0;$i 12;$i++) {
echo {$i}: ;
echo date(d m Y,mktime(0, 0, 0,date(m)+$i , date(d), date(Y)));
echo 'br';
}
It's a good thing you're trying this today; if you had tried it a few
days ago, you wouldn't have had any idea that your method wasn't
working.
--
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug with multipart/form-data ?
[snip] I have a form in a page 1, that POSTs a file and some hidden's to page 2. If the file size is bigger that the max in php.ini, in page 2, $_POST is empty. [/snip] Why, of course it is! The php.ini sets the max file size $_POST will be empty because it would not be allowed to load. You have two choices; A. increase the max file size in the php.ini 2. reduce the size of the file being uploaded. It is not a bug. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug with multipart/form-data ?
From: Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] I have a form in a page 1, that POSTs a file and some hidden's to page 2. If the file size is bigger that the max in php.ini, in page 2, $_POST is empty. [/snip] Why, of course it is! The php.ini sets the max file size $_POST will be empty because it would not be allowed to load. You have two choices; A. increase the max file size in the php.ini 2. reduce the size of the file being uploaded. It is not a bug. I understand what you're saying, and maybe the OP will agree with me here, but does that seem like the natural way for it to be handled? Shouldn't $_FILES be empty and $_POST still have the rest of the posted data? PHP decides to reject the file, but why does it reject the rest of the post data, also? Maybe off-topic for this list, but if that's what the OP was talking about, then I've got to kind of agree with him. ---John Holmes... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug with multipart/form-data ?
Maybe the post_max_size is also exceeded, and therefore it's handled with sense I think.. Otherwise I'm not sure I think this is handled the right way, if it's only upload_max_filesize that's exceeded. -- // DvDmanDT MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com John W. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev i meddelandet news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jay Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] I have a form in a page 1, that POSTs a file and some hidden's to page 2. If the file size is bigger that the max in php.ini, in page 2, $_POST is empty. [/snip] Why, of course it is! The php.ini sets the max file size $_POST will be empty because it would not be allowed to load. You have two choices; A. increase the max file size in the php.ini 2. reduce the size of the file being uploaded. It is not a bug. I understand what you're saying, and maybe the OP will agree with me here, but does that seem like the natural way for it to be handled? Shouldn't $_FILES be empty and $_POST still have the rest of the posted data? PHP decides to reject the file, but why does it reject the rest of the post data, also? Maybe off-topic for this list, but if that's what the OP was talking about, then I've got to kind of agree with him. ---John Holmes... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in PHP
--- Kyle Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have a line of code include 'new_album.php'; i keep getting a file not found error i KNOW the file is there i copy the code to a new file, and save it as 123.php and then change the line of code to include '123.php'; and voile! it works! it seems there is something wrong with using the name 'new_album.php' with include but i dunno why... When things make no sense, it is almost always because of an erroneous assumption. In this case, that assumption is probably that the name has anything to do with whether PHP can include something. Of course, if you use the wrong name (typo), that will cause a problem. In addition, if the permissions are such that Apache can't read the file, then that will also cause a problem. You have all that you need to debug this problem yourself. You have something that works and something that doesn't. As the Sesame Street song says, One of these things is not like the other... Hope that helps. Chris = Chris Shiflett - http://shiflett.org/ PHP Security - O'Reilly Coming mid-2004 HTTP Developer's Handbook - Sams http://httphandbook.org/ PHP Community Site http://phpcommunity.org/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] bug in PHP
Kyle Goetz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, February 26, 2004 3:06 PM said: hey so i've been struggling with an apparent bug in and older version of PHP but i wouldn't know where to look about this bug, as it concerns the include function and there is no mention of a bug that i can find... i'm not familiar with any bug like that (seems unlikely that there would be a bug like that) so i'm just going to start at square one. 1. what exactly does your code look like? 2. what exactly is the error you're getting? chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] BUG: fatal error uses html in cgi version (WAS: require_once() or die(); = fatal error)
Hmm.. It's not turning it off for me. Hence the reason I tried to handle it gracefully myself. ;-) I get exactly what you see there below for the fatal error. This is from an RPM package for RH8. perhaps it is fixed in a version since 4.2.2? -Original Message- From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 10:48 PM To: Daevid Vincent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error By default the CLI version turns off the html in the error messages. And no, really, there is no bug here. You are testing the return code of something that doesn't have one. It doesn't make sense. -Rasmus On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote: Hmm... Well Rasmus, I do see your point, however it still seems to me it 'should' at least compile and work as I expect it to. My way, the logic is that the file *is* 'required' (whereas I view 'include' files as optional), and I want to exit the program with a graceful message instead of the fatal error (which doesn't really doesn't tell me what the problem is -- Failed opening required '1' doesn't mean anything to me or the user) that is shown. My intent was to put a @require_once() so that I could do just that. Especially since I'm running my script on the command line, and your stock fatal error message uses HTML tags. Not a critical bug or a show stopper, but I do still feel it is a bug. -Original Message- From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:55 PM To: Daevid Vincent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error This code doesn't make much sense. By definition, if require cannot open a file it throws a fatal error, so you would never hit the or case anyway. Hence there is no return code from require and you can't write code like this. If you want to test the return code you need to use 'include' instead. -Rasmus On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote: Using PHP 4.2.2 on Linux RH8: In a PHP script run from command line, require_once(gibberator_data.php) or die(No Data file found\n); Causes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibberator]# ./gibberator.php br / bFatal error/b: Failed opening required '1' (include_path='.:/php/includes;/usr/share/phpwebtools') in b/home/gibberator/gibberator.php/b on line b13/bbr / However require_once(gibberator_data.php); Works just fine. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error
By default the CLI version turns off the html in the error messages. And no, really, there is no bug here. You are testing the return code of something that doesn't have one. It doesn't make sense. -Rasmus On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote: Hmm... Well Rasmus, I do see your point, however it still seems to me it 'should' at least compile and work as I expect it to. My way, the logic is that the file *is* 'required' (whereas I view 'include' files as optional), and I want to exit the program with a graceful message instead of the fatal error (which doesn't really doesn't tell me what the problem is -- Failed opening required '1' doesn't mean anything to me or the user) that is shown. My intent was to put a @require_once() so that I could do just that. Especially since I'm running my script on the command line, and your stock fatal error message uses HTML tags. Not a critical bug or a show stopper, but I do still feel it is a bug. -Original Message- From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:55 PM To: Daevid Vincent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error This code doesn't make much sense. By definition, if require cannot open a file it throws a fatal error, so you would never hit the or case anyway. Hence there is no return code from require and you can't write code like this. If you want to test the return code you need to use 'include' instead. -Rasmus On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote: Using PHP 4.2.2 on Linux RH8: In a PHP script run from command line, require_once(gibberator_data.php) or die(No Data file found\n); Causes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibberator]# ./gibberator.php br / bFatal error/b: Failed opening required '1' (include_path='.:/php/includes;/usr/share/phpwebtools') in b/home/gibberator/gibberator.php/b on line b13/bbr / However require_once(gibberator_data.php); Works just fine. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error
Hmm... Well Rasmus, I do see your point, however it still seems to me it 'should' at least compile and work as I expect it to. My way, the logic is that the file *is* 'required' (whereas I view 'include' files as optional), and I want to exit the program with a graceful message instead of the fatal error (which doesn't really doesn't tell me what the problem is -- Failed opening required '1' doesn't mean anything to me or the user) that is shown. My intent was to put a @require_once() so that I could do just that. Especially since I'm running my script on the command line, and your stock fatal error message uses HTML tags. Not a critical bug or a show stopper, but I do still feel it is a bug. -Original Message- From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:55 PM To: Daevid Vincent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error This code doesn't make much sense. By definition, if require cannot open a file it throws a fatal error, so you would never hit the or case anyway. Hence there is no return code from require and you can't write code like this. If you want to test the return code you need to use 'include' instead. -Rasmus On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote: Using PHP 4.2.2 on Linux RH8: In a PHP script run from command line, require_once(gibberator_data.php) or die(No Data file found\n); Causes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibberator]# ./gibberator.php br / bFatal error/b: Failed opening required '1' (include_path='.:/php/includes;/usr/share/phpwebtools') in b/home/gibberator/gibberator.php/b on line b13/bbr / However require_once(gibberator_data.php); Works just fine. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error
* Thus wrote Daevid Vincent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): My way, the logic is that the file *is* 'required' (whereas I view 'include' files as optional), and I want to exit the program with a graceful message instead of the fatal error (which doesn't really doesn't tell me what the problem is -- Failed opening required '1' doesn't mean anything to me or the user) that is shown. My intent was to put a @require_once() so that I could do just that. Especially since I'm running my script on the command line, and your stock fatal error message uses HTML tags. Remove your 'or die()' and the message required opening required '1' will show up properly. About the html errors: 1. Use the php parameter -dhtml_errors=off 2. create a php-cli.ini in the location were php reads current php.ini 3. Use the -c parameter to tell php to use a different ini file to read. Not a critical bug or a show stopper, but I do still feel it is a bug. If your car does'nt float in the water is it the manufacturer's fault? Curt -- My PHP key is worn out PHP List stats since 1997: http://zirzow.dyndns.org/html/mlists/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] BUG: require_once() or die(); = fatal error
This code doesn't make much sense. By definition, if require cannot open a file it throws a fatal error, so you would never hit the or case anyway. Hence there is no return code from require and you can't write code like this. If you want to test the return code you need to use 'include' instead. -Rasmus On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Daevid Vincent wrote: Using PHP 4.2.2 on Linux RH8: In a PHP script run from command line, require_once(gibberator_data.php) or die(No Data file found\n); Causes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gibberator]# ./gibberator.php br / bFatal error/b: Failed opening required '1' (include_path='.:/php/includes;/usr/share/phpwebtools') in b/home/gibberator/gibberator.php/b on line b13/bbr / However require_once(gibberator_data.php); Works just fine. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] BUG: sprintf(%u) and ip2long
* Thus wrote Daevid Vincent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Could be my not understanding of something, but I think there is a bug in using ip2long() and sprintf(%u) as indicated on this page: http://us4.php.net/manual/en/function.ip2long.php What version of php? It works find in 4.3.3. echo long2ip(3232304168); --- 192.169.12.40 Curt -- My PHP key is worn out PHP List stats since 1997: http://zirzow.dyndns.org/html/mlists/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] BUG: sprintf(%u) and ip2long
Good point... v4.1.2, Linux stripples.devel.redhat.com 2.4.18-11smp #1 SMP Thu Aug 15 06:41:59 EDT 2002 i686 unknown This program makes use of the Zend Scripting Language Engine: Zend Engine v1.1.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2001 Zend Technologies with Zend Optimizer v2.1.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2003, by Zend Technologies Apache/1.3.22 Also, if you notice, in my example, the problem was using the sprintf (%u) as per the example on the php website. Just doing like you did works for me too... -Original Message- From: Curt Zirzow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] BUG: sprintf(%u) and ip2long * Thus wrote Daevid Vincent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Could be my not understanding of something, but I think there is a bug in using ip2long() and sprintf(%u) as indicated on this page: http://us4.php.net/manual/en/function.ip2long.php What version of php? It works find in 4.3.3. echo long2ip(3232304168); --- 192.169.12.40 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] BUG: sprintf(%u) and ip2long
* Thus wrote Daevid Vincent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Good point... v4.1.2, Linux stripples.devel.redhat.com 2.4.18-11smp #1 SMP Thu Aug 15 06:41:59 EDT 2002 i686 unknown This program makes use of the Zend Scripting Language Engine: Zend Engine v1.1.1, Copyright (c) 1998-2001 Zend Technologies with Zend Optimizer v2.1.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2003, by Zend Technologies Apache/1.3.22 Also, if you notice, in my example, the problem was using the sprintf (%u) as per the example on the php website. Just doing like you did works for me too... still works using sprintf() with 4.3.3 http://zirzow.dyndns.org/html/php/tests/string/ip2long.php Curt -- My PHP key is worn out PHP List stats since 1997: http://zirzow.dyndns.org/html/mlists/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP Bug Problems
on 10/1/03 7:50 PM, Richard Baskett at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I saw a post on a forum talking about a certain bug that PHP has for Mac OS X.. so I thought.. Im on OS X, I should see if that bug is real since on bugs.php.net they say it's bogus which you can view here: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=25394 So I tried it out.. at first I created a loop that assigned $x = 1; a whole bunch of times, but that didn¹t crash anything.. I then read the authors post a little closer and I realized it was a number of lines problem.. so I crated a php file that had a whole bunch of $x = 1; commands in it.. 7996 to be exact.. add the opening and closing php tag.. that made 7998 lines.. the script still worked.. Now I added one more line so that there were 7999 lines and guess what? Yep you got it.. my script didn¹t work anymore. Which the author it looks like it took 8014 lines instead of my 7999 lines to break it. I thought this was strange and it looked like the author of the php bug report was indeed on the up-and-up and it wasn¹t a bogus bug as bugs.php.net had said it was. So I thought to myself.. well I should post to bugs.php.net and tell them that I to can reproduce the bug. So I did. Well to make an already long story short.. it looks like after a couple of hours bugs.php.net has removed my post. My question to you is.. is there any reason why they would remove my post? For me.. since I do not write that many lines of code for one run of a script it really didn¹t matter much to me, but since they removed my post.. it's beginning to make me wonder what's going on.. Hopefully someone can shed some light! Well Eugene.. it looks like your post was removed also. We are wondering if it is automatic when a bug is deemed bogus or if there is some other reason.. But then again it takes awhile for it to be removed.. so if it was a script that does it, Im not sure why it would take that long to run.. I really have no clue of what's going on.. and so far only one person on OS X, Mr. Blanchard himself, has not had this problem.. as far as I know. So I don't think they would be ignoring this.. I would be curious to hear what Rasmus had to say.. since I think he would know the innerworkings of php plus the bugs.php.net site.. Anyways hopefully something can be figured out! Rick Too much caution is bad for you. By avoiding things you fear, you may let yourself in for unhappy consequences. It is usually wiser to stand up to a scary-seeming experience and walk right into it, risking the bruises as hard knocks. You are likely to find it is not as tough as you had thought. Or you may find it plenty tough, but also discover you have what it takes to handle it. - Norman Vincent Peale -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug...
[snip] I run the script through a browser. The overall script takes about 36 minutes to run. I have changed the php.ini values to allow the script to run for longer than this. The script runs, but I always end up with a 500 error. [/snip] Have you also set your webserver software time accordingly? Apache, IIS, and others come with a default time for a response. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug...
And you get a 500 error? First off, it is probably not a bug. If the first two reports get generated there may be a problem in the code for the third report. -Original Message- From: Joe Privett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:28 AM To: Jay Blanchard Subject: RE: [PHP] Bug... In the httpd.conf file for Apache, I have changed the 'Timeout' to 7200 seconds. Joe -Original Message- From: Jay Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 August 2003 12:24 To: Joe Privett; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Bug... [snip] I run the script through a browser. The overall script takes about 36 minutes to run. I have changed the php.ini values to allow the script to run for longer than this. The script runs, but I always end up with a 500 error. [/snip] Have you also set your webserver software time accordingly? Apache, IIS, and others come with a default time for a response. __ This message has been scanned for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen. The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs. This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted attachments. If you are interested in finding out more about the service, please visit our website at http://www.btignite.com/internetservices/btnet/products_virusscreen.htm == DISCLAIMER: This email is private and confidential and is for the addressee only. If misdirected, please notify us and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and any hard copies destroyed. You are strictly prohibited from using, printing, distributing or disseminating it or any information contained in it to save to the intended recipient. __ This message has been checked for all viruses by BTnet VirusScreen. The service is delivered in partnership with MessageLabs. This service does not scan any password protected or encrypted attachments. If you are interested in finding out more about the service, please visit our website at http://www.btignite.com/internetservices/btnet/products_virusscreen.htm == -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
Just an addendum.. My parser has $colors=; right before the foreach
loop.
Kris Yates wrote:
Hi,
I have a form with checkboxes that POSTs to a PHP script.
What is posted [ from phpinfo() ]:
_POST[color-1] on
_POST[color-4] on
_POST[color-6] on
Parser:
foreach($_POST as $ThisVar=$ThisVal){
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1){
$newVarA=explode(-, $ThisVar);
$colors.=$newVarA[1]:;
}
}
Expected Output:
$colors=1:4:6:;
Real Output:
$colors=:1:4:6:;
I can work with the output I am getting, however, I am curious why I
am not getting the expected output. Can anyone shed light on this?
I am using PHP 4.3.2 compiled under a unix environment. Is this a bug
in ereg or am I just not seeing something obvious in my foreach?
Thanks,
Kris
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
What is posted [ from phpinfo() ]:
_POST[color-1] on
_POST[color-4] on
_POST[color-6] on
Parser:
foreach($_POST as $ThisVar=$ThisVal){
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1){
$newVarA=explode(-, $ThisVar);
$colors.=$newVarA[1]:;
}
}
Expected Output:
$colors=1:4:6:;
Real Output:
$colors=:1:4:6:;
Do you have anything else in _POST that's equal to 1? I didn't look up
order of operation, so I may be off here, but your if condition might not be
doing what you are expecting. Try using parentheses to group it like this
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND ($ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1)){ (I'm
guessing that's what you want). Why are you using ereg anyway? You're not
using a regular expression so strstr would work just as well and be slightly
faster.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
* Thus wrote Kris Yates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
I have a form with checkboxes that POSTs to a PHP script.
What is posted [ from phpinfo() ]:
_POST[color-1] on
_POST[color-4] on
_POST[color-6] on
There is more post data than this.
Parser:
foreach($_POST as $ThisVar=$ThisVal){
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1){
$newVarA=explode(-, $ThisVar);
$colors.=$newVarA[1]:;
}
}
Your logic, as jennifer pointed, isn't probably what your
expecting. You're POST data has a value of 1 somewhere.
Also, ereg is very expensive for doing exact string matches like
you are doing there, best to use the str* functions avaible to do
tasks like this. ie:
if ('color-' == substr($ThisVar, 0, 6))
And then no need to explode into an array and then extract the
value (more overhead).. since the format is known you can do
something like:
$colors .= substr($ThisVar, 6);
HTH,
Curt
--
I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
Kris Yates wrote:
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1){
this condition reads
if( (ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on) OR $ThisVal==1)
It is called operator precedence.
www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.html#language.operators.precedence
You have POST var with value of 1 somewhere before.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
Hope I can be of any help again .. what you are doing seems rather
complicated... what if you have your checkboxes like:
input type=checkbox name=checkbox[colors][1] value=on
input type=checkbox name=checkbox[colors][4] value=on
input type=checkbox name=checkbox[colors][6] value=on
and the recieving script just doing:
if (isset($_POST['colors']) is_array($_POST['colors'])) $colors =
join(':', $_POST['colors']);
PHP will only register indexes in the $_POST['colors'] array for the boxes
that are checked, all your colors are in one array, so one simple join would
do the trick .. won't it? The if in front of it is just to prevent any
undefined index notices .. might you have E_ALL set as error level.
.. wait .. getting a message .. yeah, there's a better way
$colors = (isset($_POST['colors']) is_array($_POST['colors'])) ? $colors
= join(':', $_POST['colors']) : '';
now your $colors variable will always be set with a string value.
Grtz,
Wouter
Ps. anybody knows when syntax highlighting is gonna be an option in MS
Outlook? Would be neat, wouldn't it?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Kris Yates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 15 augustus 2003 23:53
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
Hi,
I have a form with checkboxes that POSTs to a PHP script.
What is posted [ from phpinfo() ]:
_POST[color-1]on
_POST[color-4]on
_POST[color-6]on
Parser:
foreach($_POST as $ThisVar=$ThisVal){
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1){
$newVarA=explode(-, $ThisVar);
$colors.=$newVarA[1]:;
}
}
Expected Output:
$colors=1:4:6:;
Real Output:
$colors=:1:4:6:;
I can work with the output I am getting, however, I am curious why I am
not getting the expected output. Can anyone shed light on this? I am
using PHP 4.3.2 compiled under a unix environment. Is this a bug in
ereg or am I just not seeing something obvious in my foreach?
Thanks,
Kris
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
ow .. this script won't work ..
checkboxes like this:
input type=checkbox name=colors[1] value=on
or var calling like this:
$_POST['checkbox']['colors']
would do better ;) of course :D:D
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Wouter van Vliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zaterdag 16 augustus 2003 1:06
Aan: Kris Yates; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
Hope I can be of any help again .. what you are doing seems rather
complicated... what if you have your checkboxes like:
input type=checkbox name=checkbox[colors][1] value=on
input type=checkbox name=checkbox[colors][4] value=on
input type=checkbox name=checkbox[colors][6] value=on
and the recieving script just doing:
if (isset($_POST['colors']) is_array($_POST['colors'])) $colors =
join(':', $_POST['colors']);
PHP will only register indexes in the $_POST['colors'] array for the boxes
that are checked, all your colors are in one array, so one simple join would
do the trick .. won't it? The if in front of it is just to prevent any
undefined index notices .. might you have E_ALL set as error level.
.. wait .. getting a message .. yeah, there's a better way
$colors = (isset($_POST['colors']) is_array($_POST['colors'])) ? $colors
= join(':', $_POST['colors']) : '';
now your $colors variable will always be set with a string value.
Grtz,
Wouter
Ps. anybody knows when syntax highlighting is gonna be an option in MS
Outlook? Would be neat, wouldn't it?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Kris Yates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 15 augustus 2003 23:53
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [PHP] Bug in Ereg?
Hi,
I have a form with checkboxes that POSTs to a PHP script.
What is posted [ from phpinfo() ]:
_POST[color-1]on
_POST[color-4]on
_POST[color-6]on
Parser:
foreach($_POST as $ThisVar=$ThisVal){
if(ereg(color-, $ThisVar) AND $ThisVal==on OR $ThisVal==1){
$newVarA=explode(-, $ThisVar);
$colors.=$newVarA[1]:;
}
}
Expected Output:
$colors=1:4:6:;
Real Output:
$colors=:1:4:6:;
I can work with the output I am getting, however, I am curious why I am
not getting the expected output. Can anyone shed light on this? I am
using PHP 4.3.2 compiled under a unix environment. Is this a bug in
ereg or am I just not seeing something obvious in my foreach?
Thanks,
Kris
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
INPUT TYPE=checkbox NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] == 1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo
$search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
well for starters checkboxes dont have a size and maxlength
you may want to try that and see if it works...
- Original Message -
From: Amanda McComb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
Ok, after all of the discussion on posting, I'm afraid to post.
Unfortunately, no one I know is a programmer, and I am a beginner. I can
normally figure out what I've done wrong, but I'm missing something here.
Ok, here is my query and the bit of code I can't figure out:
$query = SELECT * from apt_user_t a, apt_company_t b ;
$query .= WHERE a.user_cd = b.user_cd ;
$query .= ORDER BY a.username;
$search_results = mysql_query($query) or die(Select
Failed!);
while ($search_result2 = mysql_fetch_array($search_results))
{
INPUT
TYPE=checkbox
NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
SIZE=20
MAXLENGTH=50
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] == 1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo
$search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
Nothing shows up with the echo or the value. I only included this
checkbox, but all of the other values show up fine. Can someone give me a
hint?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
Ok, here is my query and the bit of code I can't figure out:
$query = SELECT * from apt_user_t a, apt_company_t b ;
$query .= WHERE a.user_cd = b.user_cd ;
$query .= ORDER BY a.username;
$search_results = mysql_query($query) or die(Select
Failed!);
while ($search_result2 = mysql_fetch_array($search_results))
{
INPUT
TYPE=checkbox
NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
SIZE=20
MAXLENGTH=50
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] ==
1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
Nothing shows up with the echo or the value. I only included this
checkbox, but all of the other values show up fine. Can someone give me a
hint?
Mysql does not prefix returned columns with table_name., so there's probably
no a.retired_flag index in your array. A simple way to check this would
be to print_r($search_result2). If you have a column named retired_flag in
both table a and table b and you specifically want the one from table a in
your result set you are going to have to alias it to a different name in
your query, i.e. SELECT *, a.retired_flag as r_flag
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
AciD wrote: just a little point; u can replace ?echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag]? by ?=$search_result2[a.retired_flag]? which is better imho. and you're entitled to it, but it's not better. Shorter isn't always better. Your code will break if enable_short_open_tags is disabled in php.ini or an .htaccess file. Sure, it's on by default, but some people turn it off, especially when dealing with XML a lot. -- ---John Holmes... Amazon Wishlist: www.amazon.com/o/registry/3BEXC84AB3A5E/ PHP|Architect: A magazine for PHP Professionals www.phparch.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
just a little point; u can replace
?echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
by ?=$search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
which is better imho.
AciD
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:57:23 -0700, Jennifer Goodie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here is my query and the bit of code I can't figure out:
$query = SELECT * from apt_user_t a, apt_company_t b ;
$query .= WHERE a.user_cd = b.user_cd ;
$query .= ORDER BY a.username;
$search_results = mysql_query($query) or die(Select
Failed!);
while ($search_result2 = mysql_fetch_array($search_results))
{
INPUT
TYPE=checkbox
NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
SIZE=20
MAXLENGTH=50
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] ==
1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
Nothing shows up with the echo or the value. I only included this
checkbox, but all of the other values show up fine. Can someone give me
a
hint?
Mysql does not prefix returned columns with table_name., so there's
probably
no a.retired_flag index in your array. A simple way to check this
would
be to print_r($search_result2). If you have a column named retired_flag
in
both table a and table b and you specifically want the one from table a
in
your result set you are going to have to alias it to a different name in
your query, i.e. SELECT *, a.retired_flag as r_flag
--
www.cpm-fr.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
Is it realy so? I remember someone noting on this list it also work if short tags are off. I have never tested it and I'm not going to restart our server now, but I will try it at home. John W. Holmes wrote: AciD wrote: just a little point; u can replace ?echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag]? by ?=$search_result2[a.retired_flag]? which is better imho. and you're entitled to it, but it's not better. Shorter isn't always better. Your code will break if enable_short_open_tags is disabled in php.ini or an .htaccess file. Sure, it's on by default, but some people turn it off, especially when dealing with XML a lot. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
silly me
upon further looking
INPUT TYPE=checkbox NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
VALUE=? echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag];?
?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] == 1) echo CHECKED; ?
?echo $search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
- Original Message -
From: Amanda McComb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
Ok, after all of the discussion on posting, I'm afraid to post.
Unfortunately, no one I know is a programmer, and I am a beginner. I can
normally figure out what I've done wrong, but I'm missing something here.
Ok, here is my query and the bit of code I can't figure out:
$query = SELECT * from apt_user_t a, apt_company_t b ;
$query .= WHERE a.user_cd = b.user_cd ;
$query .= ORDER BY a.username;
$search_results = mysql_query($query) or die(Select
Failed!);
while ($search_result2 = mysql_fetch_array($search_results))
{
INPUT
TYPE=checkbox
NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
SIZE=20
MAXLENGTH=50
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] == 1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo
$search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
Nothing shows up with the echo or the value. I only included this
checkbox, but all of the other values show up fine. Can someone give me a
hint?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
Oh, yeah. Well, I just copied and pasted that from another form. Taken
out, it still doesn't work. Even the echo, which is on no way related to
the checkbox.
Thanks!
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Chris Sherwood wrote:
INPUT TYPE=checkbox NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] == 1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo
$search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
well for starters checkboxes dont have a size and maxlength
you may want to try that and see if it works...
- Original Message -
From: Amanda McComb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: [PHP] bug in code - can't find it!
Ok, after all of the discussion on posting, I'm afraid to post.
Unfortunately, no one I know is a programmer, and I am a beginner. I can
normally figure out what I've done wrong, but I'm missing something here.
Ok, here is my query and the bit of code I can't figure out:
$query = SELECT * from apt_user_t a, apt_company_t b ;
$query .= WHERE a.user_cd = b.user_cd ;
$query .= ORDER BY a.username;
$search_results = mysql_query($query) or die(Select
Failed!);
while ($search_result2 = mysql_fetch_array($search_results))
{
INPUT
TYPE=checkbox
NAME=? echo $search_result2['user_cd'];?
SIZE=20
MAXLENGTH=50
VALUE=?if ($search_result2[a.retired_flag] == 1){?CHECKED?}? ?echo
$search_result2[a.retired_flag]?
}
Nothing shows up with the echo or the value. I only included this
checkbox, but all of the other values show up fine. Can someone give me a
hint?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in addslashes command?
I recently upgraded from 4.1.2 all the way to 4.3.2 without a single bump -- your experience may vary :) Cheers, Rob. On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:11, Merlin wrote: there is definatelly a bug in 4.2.1 since this sentence: Argostoli is the 'capitol' of Kefalonia / Kefallinia. One of the Greek Ionian islands. will be escaped by - instead of \ other examples run fine. Does anybody know if there are any serious changes between the new php version and 4.2.1 Can I upgrade without feering loosing functionality? Thanx for your help, Merlin David Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, This is a reply to an e-mail that you wrote on Tue, 22 Jul 2003 at 20:51, lines prefixed by '' were originally written by you. Hello there, I am running php 4.2.1 on a linux machine. Not sure, but I think there might be a bug in there. While putting data into the db I do get an error in a verry rar case. All values are escaped by addslashes commands. This is the original string: the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia This is the string after addslashes: the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia Which leaves the last ' unescaped. On my PHP 4.3.2 installation, echo addslashes(the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia); displays: the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia which appears to be correct. David. -- phpmachine :: The quick and easy to use service providing you with professionally developed PHP scripts :: http://www.phpmachine.com/ Professional Web Development by David Nicholson http://www.djnicholson.com/ QuizSender.com - How well do your friends actually know you? http://www.quizsender.com/ (developed entirely in PHP) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- .-. | Worlds of Carnage - http://www.wocmud.org | :-: | Come visit a world of myth and legend where | | fantastical creatures come to life and the | | stuff of nightmares grasp for your soul.| `-' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] bug in addslashes command?
Hello, This is a reply to an e-mail that you wrote on Tue, 22 Jul 2003 at 20:51, lines prefixed by '' were originally written by you. Hello there, I am running php 4.2.1 on a linux machine. Not sure, but I think there might be a bug in there. While putting data into the db I do get an error in a verry rar case. All values are escaped by addslashes commands. This is the original string: the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia This is the string after addslashes: the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia Which leaves the last ' unescaped. On my PHP 4.3.2 installation, echo addslashes(the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia); displays: the 'capitol-' of Kefalonia which appears to be correct. David. -- phpmachine :: The quick and easy to use service providing you with professionally developed PHP scripts :: http://www.phpmachine.com/ Professional Web Development by David Nicholson http://www.djnicholson.com/ QuizSender.com - How well do your friends actually know you? http://www.quizsender.com/ (developed entirely in PHP) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
