Re: Adding relation
I apologize for the confusion, the issue was completely unrelated to the core functionality, it's all good. On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi Henrik, Hi, I'm trying to add a relation, at first I added (rel newRel (+String)) to the class, and then put newRel in the dbs. Right, though adding to 'dbs' makes only sense for indexes (i.e. as you did with the (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) below). That didn't work though, information refused to get saved so I changed the rel call to (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) but still the database refuses to store anything in newRel when using for instance put!. Strange. This should definitely work. There must be some other problem. Can you try to debug it more? Is there an error? For example, 'put!' will complain in the 'has' method if the relation is not known. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Adding relation
Hi, I'm trying to add a relation, at first I added (rel newRel (+String)) to the class, and then put newRel in the dbs. That didn't work though, information refused to get saved so I changed the rel call to (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) but still the database refuses to store anything in newRel when using for instance put!. What went wrong here and how can I fix it? AFAIK normally when I add relations like this it just works. -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Adding relation
Hi Henrik, Hi, I'm trying to add a relation, at first I added (rel newRel (+String)) to the class, and then put newRel in the dbs. Right, though adding to 'dbs' makes only sense for indexes (i.e. as you did with the (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) below). That didn't work though, information refused to get saved so I changed the rel call to (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) but still the database refuses to store anything in newRel when using for instance put!. Strange. This should definitely work. There must be some other problem. Can you try to debug it more? Is there an error? For example, 'put!' will complain in the 'has' method if the relation is not known. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe