Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Vincent Fourmond 
  Hello,

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
 Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby;
 would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths?

  Yep. The problem is that the calls to ruby with the package ruby
installed now install the 1.9.1 version, but you only pull development
files for ruby1.8. I've checked that it works changing from ruby to
ruby1.8. You probably should try to use ruby1.9.1-dev at a later date.

  Cheers,

  Vincent



___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Vincent Fourmond 
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
 On 04/06/12 21:14, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
 I've checked that it works changing from ruby to
 ruby1.8. You probably should try to use ruby1.9.1-dev at a later date.

 I'm not the maintainer, I was just asking.  Thanks a lot for the help!

 Not tested this myself yet;  I expect it to fix this on the buildds, but
 maybe it could still FTBFS on a system with ruby1.8 and ruby1.9.1
 installed together.  Then it might need an executable name or shebang
 line changing somewhere?

  As far as I can tell, the package doesn't contain ruby scripts, only
bindings. Dependencies will need to make sure ruby1.8 is used, though.
(but there isn't ;-)...). Users will have to take care.

  Cheers,

  Vincent



___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel