Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Concerns about infrastructure for Alioth replacement
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > CCing the Javascript Team. > > Original post on debian-devel, see: > Message-Id: <20171016001558.a9c2e92f9155e844f43ce...@paranoici.org> > > Or alternatively: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/10/msg00262.html > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:32:55PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 04:28:09 + Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > Francesco, great idea, go ahead. You would be most welcome to help with > > > > Debian Ruby Extra packaging. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I have basically zero knowledge about Rails, JavaScript > > > and Node.js: I could not be of much help in packaging GitLab. > > > > > > What I meant was that the time that will be spent in manually installing, > > > manually adapting, and manually upgrading the upstream version, would > > > perhaps be better spent in helping the maintainers to keep the Debian > > > package up-to-date and in using the Debian package in stead of the > > > upstream > > > version... > > Nope. I know how to setup gitlab, I don't - and I don't want to have > > knowledge (and I don't have time to do it) to maintain numerous ruby and > > nodejs modules. > > > > Alex > > > > On 16 October 2017 at 06:52, Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote: > > On 10/16/2017 03:45 AM, Francesco Poli wrote: > >> I would say that this issue with the Debian packages of GitLab should > >> be addressed by helping the Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers to improve > >> the Debian packages and to keep them more up-to-date. > > > > gitlab 9.x has switched to using node modules + webpack for front end. > > So any help in packaging the node dependencies welcome. > > > > See https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/gitlab for the > > current status. > > > > Btw all ruby dependencies for 9.5.x are packaged already. > > > > Dear Javascript Team, > > Would you please consider maintaining the "numerous [...] nodejs > modules" necessary for Debian's Alioth replacement to run on a > Debian-built GitLab package? We are facing a scenario that confirms > that Debian packaging is not good enough--even for Debian's own > infrastructure. > > I would join the team, but it would take me weeks/months to learn > about Javascript and Nodejs, and it seems this transition is imminent. > > In the worst-case scenario, if that work cannot be completed on time, > a deadline should be set for transitioning to official Debian-built > packages. Let's say well before DebConf18 so that it will be well > tested for DebCamp. > > Please reply to debian-devel and CC Francesco Poli <invernom...@paranoici.org> Please don't get me wrong, but even if gitlab packages are recent tomorrow (which I don't think) we won't migrate. The work is done and we have all the things in place to maintain them. So please do me a favour and don't mention alioth as the reason. Alex signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] jssip_0.6.34-5~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Package not in testing. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] rtcninjajs_0.6.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Package not in testing. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-typedarray-to-buffer_3.0.3-3~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
This version is not even in debian. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-is-typedarray_1.0.0-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Package not in testing. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-events_1.0.2-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Package not in testing === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] node-bowser_0.7.3-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Package not in testing === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-websocket_1.0.19-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 29/09/15 20:13, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 29/09/15 18:01, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >>> > >>> Package not in testing > >>> > >> > >> > >> The version in testing had to be updated to 1.0.22 to work with node-nan > >> 2.0.x. It is not clear if that dependency will be placed in > >> debian-packports > >> > >> node-websocket versions <= 1.0.21 work with the node-nan version > >> currently in jessie > >> > >> Please confirm I can upload this again and potentially upload 1.0.21 > >> even though testing will carry a newer version. > > no. we had this several times. Such packages will not be accepted within > > bpo. > > > > What about 1.0.19-1 that has been in testing for a while? Can I upload > a 1.0.19-1~bpo8+1 build to jessie-backports even though a newer version > is now in unstable? > > Jérémy, is there any problem with putting node-nan 2.0.x into > jessie-backports? Should I go ahead and upload it, should it be > avoided, or does it need some discussion? we (ftpmasters) expect you to update packages in bpo regulary during the whole lifetime of a suite, if you are not able to do that, the package is not suitable for bpo. Alex ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] jssip_0.6.34-5~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 29/09/15 18:01, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Package not in testing. > > These packages only had their VCS fields updated, otherwise they are the > same as the packages in testing Thats no reason for uploading them, the rules are clear. That was very, very annoying. Alex ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-websocket_1.0.19-2~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 29/09/15 18:01, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Package not in testing > > > > > The version in testing had to be updated to 1.0.22 to work with node-nan > 2.0.x. It is not clear if that dependency will be placed in > debian-packports > > node-websocket versions <= 1.0.21 work with the node-nan version > currently in jessie > > Please confirm I can upload this again and potentially upload 1.0.21 > even though testing will carry a newer version. no. we had this several times. Such packages will not be accepted within bpo. Alex ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] less.js_1.4.2-1~bpo7+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Wrong version schema === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
