On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote:

> 
> 
> On 29/09/15 20:13, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/09/15 18:01, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Package not in testing
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> The version in testing had to be updated to 1.0.22 to work with node-nan
> >> 2.0.x.  It is not clear if that dependency will be placed in
> >> debian-packports
> >>
> >> node-websocket versions <= 1.0.21 work with the node-nan version
> >> currently in jessie
> >>
> >> Please confirm I can upload this again and potentially upload 1.0.21
> >> even though testing will carry a newer version.
> > no. we had this several times. Such packages will not be accepted within 
> > bpo. 
> > 
> 
> What about 1.0.19-1 that has been in testing for a while?  Can I upload
> a 1.0.19-1~bpo8+1 build to jessie-backports even though a newer version
> is now in unstable?
> 
> Jérémy, is there any problem with putting node-nan 2.0.x into
> jessie-backports?  Should I go ahead and upload it, should it be
> avoided, or does it need some discussion?
we (ftpmasters) expect you to update packages in bpo regulary during the
whole lifetime of a suite, if you are not able to do that, the package is not
suitable for bpo.

Alex


_______________________________________________
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to