On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 29/09/15 20:13, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 29/09/15 18:01, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >>> > >>> Package not in testing > >>> > >> > >> > >> The version in testing had to be updated to 1.0.22 to work with node-nan > >> 2.0.x. It is not clear if that dependency will be placed in > >> debian-packports > >> > >> node-websocket versions <= 1.0.21 work with the node-nan version > >> currently in jessie > >> > >> Please confirm I can upload this again and potentially upload 1.0.21 > >> even though testing will carry a newer version. > > no. we had this several times. Such packages will not be accepted within > > bpo. > > > > What about 1.0.19-1 that has been in testing for a while? Can I upload > a 1.0.19-1~bpo8+1 build to jessie-backports even though a newer version > is now in unstable? > > Jérémy, is there any problem with putting node-nan 2.0.x into > jessie-backports? Should I go ahead and upload it, should it be > avoided, or does it need some discussion? we (ftpmasters) expect you to update packages in bpo regulary during the whole lifetime of a suite, if you are not able to do that, the package is not suitable for bpo.