Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h
On 2007-01-15 08:49+0100 Arjen Markus wrote: Well, to cut a long story short: we will use unique names - period. OK. I noticed you didn't make the commit so I did. I didn't test the change, but I think it should be okay. Alan __ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the Yorick front-end to PLplot (yplot.sf.net); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __ Linux-powered Science __ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h
Alan W. Irwin wrote: Hi Orion: Thanks for finding this. Note, the present version should work because the effect of common /zzplstr6/ string6 common /zzplstr6/ string7 common /zzplstr6/ string8 common /zzplstr6/ string9 is identical to common /zzplstr6/ string6, string7, string8, string9 However, I also suspect repeating the 6 is just a typo, and it is a little cleaner to keep the common blocks separate so your patch should probably be applied. Arjen, do you agree? Hi Alan, it must have been a typo indeed - it is at the very least much cleaner to use unique names. What is more, I am not even sure that the effect you describe on the code with the typo is indeed correct (I have not used COMMON blocks in years and there are a lot of obscure areas there ...) Well, to cut a long story short: we will use unique names - period. Regards, Arjen - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h
Orion Poplawski wrote: Interestingly enough, GNU f95 aborts with an illegal instruction on this code, otherwise I'm not sure it would have been caught. Hmm, even with the changes, I still get an illegal instruction with the latest Fedora Development f95. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h
On 2007-01-11 15:27-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: Interestingly enough, GNU f95 aborts with an illegal instruction on this code, otherwise I'm not sure it would have been caught. Hmm, even with the changes, I still get an illegal instruction with the latest Fedora Development f95. Hi Orion: Can you please give a lot more details? Below I pose a series of questions that come to mind, but don't hold back any extra information you think might be relevant beyond these questions. If that illegal instruction occurs during compilation, what file is being compiled when it occurs? If that illegal instruction occurs during excecution of compiled code, what executable are we talking about and how was it compiled? Is it just one of the standard examples, or does the problem occur for all standard examples. If it was an example, was it built in the build tree or install tree? What is the result of the f95 --version command? On my Ubuntu dapper system I have the following results: [EMAIL PROTECTED] f95 --version GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5)) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. You may redistribute copies of GNU Fortran under the terms of the GNU General Public License. For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING For that version of gfortran, there is no problem like what you are describing. Can you install gcc-4.0.x versions of the gcc compilers for Fedora to see if that makes a difference for you? Alan __ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the Yorick front-end to PLplot (yplot.sf.net); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __ Linux-powered Science __ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
Re: [Plplot-devel] Typo in bindings/f95/sfstubs.h and bindings/f77/sfstubs.h
Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2007-01-11 15:27-0700 Orion Poplawski wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: Interestingly enough, GNU f95 aborts with an illegal instruction on this code, otherwise I'm not sure it would have been caught. Hmm, even with the changes, I still get an illegal instruction with the latest Fedora Development f95. Hi Orion: Can you please give a lot more details? Below I pose a series of questions that come to mind, but don't hold back any extra information you think might be relevant beyond these questions. I think this is basically an issue with the Fedora Development compiler. The code compiles find on FC6 and with the latest gfortran snapshot. I wouldn't worry yourself about it - although it make my life as the Fedora packager of plplot hard. I haven't been able to compile plplot 5.7.1 on Fedora Development for a couple months now due to various issues. plplot is hard because it touches nearly every compiler/language/library. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
