Re: Copying IMAP messages instead of Forwarding?
Am 25.09.2017 um 16:37 schrieb LuKreme: > Is there a method to use IMAP to move messages to another account on another > server for which I have login credentials on delivery instead of simply > forwarding? Or would this be a question for the Dovecot list? > > I am trying to get around various spam checking and DKIM failures for a local > user who uses gmail but whose address is on my server. She wants all her mail > to end up in Gmail, but forwarding it fails too often. > > The other option that I am looking at is to enable POP3 so that gmail can > simply get the messages, but I haven’t allowed POP3 in ages and am reluctant > to do so now, though that is probably the simplest thing. > > The user isn’t really savvy enough to manage two IMAP accounts herself. > > > perhaps imaputils help https://github.com/mtsatsenko/imaputils some blog https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/01/12/imap-weiterleitungen-mit-pop3toimap-als-ersatz-fur-smtp-weiterleitungen/ Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
Re: Bombarded With Spam
On 9/25/2017 7:34 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: yes each domain must not be listed in both places, sinc postfix need to know how to deliver and route it to there destinations Okay, I set it back to mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost The other stuff was me trying to get local delivery working. dont fokus on sender access yet, fokus on recipient works before solve sender access [snip] smtpd_recipient_restrictions = [snip] with that config you are on your own, since i cant see logs, and thus not helping with the problem to be solved Well, I can but my log files are *huge* due to all the spam traffic being denied. if you like to get postfix stable dont use so many access hash files, it hides your real problem But is it okay to have all the "check" configuration lines in a single section?
Re: Copying IMAP messages instead of Forwarding?
This isn't an answer to your actual question, however: I've been using postsrsd (https://github.com/roehling/postsrsd) successfully to forward email in a similar situation - users with addresses on my box that they want to be forwarded to a Gmail account. It has obvious downsides, but it did solve the problem in my specific case, where google was rejecting ~20% because of SPF failures. -- Harald
Postfix 3.2.3 stable release available
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.2.3.html] This announcement concerns fixes for problems that were introduced with Postfix 3.2. Older releases are unaffected. Fixed in Postfix 3.2 and later: * Extension propagation was broken with "recipient_delimiter = .". This change reverts a change that was trying to be too clever. * The postqueue command would abort with a panic message after it experienced an output write error while listing the mail queue. This change restores a write error check that was lost with the Postfix 3.2 rewrite of the vbuf_print formatter. * Restored sanity checks for dynamically-specified width and precision in format strings (%*, %.*, and %*.*). These checks were lost with the Postfix 3.2 rewrite of the vbuf_print formatter. You can find the updated Postfix source code at the mirrors listed at http://www.postfix.org/. Wietse
Copying IMAP messages instead of Forwarding?
Is there a method to use IMAP to move messages to another account on another server for which I have login credentials on delivery instead of simply forwarding? Or would this be a question for the Dovecot list? I am trying to get around various spam checking and DKIM failures for a local user who uses gmail but whose address is on my server. She wants all her mail to end up in Gmail, but forwarding it fails too often. The other option that I am looking at is to enable POP3 so that gmail can simply get the messages, but I haven’t allowed POP3 in ages and am reluctant to do so now, though that is probably the simplest thing. The user isn’t really savvy enough to manage two IMAP accounts herself. -- This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Re: Bombarded With Spam
Kirk Bocek skrev den 2017-09-25 16:04: So I need to receive email from bocek.org and then relay it elsewhere. That's why I put that there. Is that wrong? yes each domain must not be listed in both places, sinc postfix need to know how to deliver and route it to there destinations dont fokus on sender access yet, fokus on recipient works before solve sender access [snip] smtpd_recipient_restrictions = [snip] with that config you are on your own, since i cant see logs, and thus not helping with the problem to be solved if you like to get postfix stable dont use so many access hash files, it hides your real problem by adding the sender_access lines. This seems to help. I realize I have two check_recipient_access lines. Is this an issue. sadly it helps you get more questions on faults aswell
Re: Postfix Mailrules from diffrend Source Systems
is there a posibility to map it through the source eMail address? -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
Re: Bombarded With Spam
On 9/25/2017 3:28 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: grep bocek.org main.cf | wc -l simple rule is that domain names is final destination for postfix, so if you have bocek.org in mydestination AND in virtual_domain it does not work as you want So I need to receive email from bocek.org and then relay it elsewhere. That's why I put that there. Is that wrong? keep mydestination as minimal as possible, and then all public domains as virtual you get more control of what happens, aswell for system accouns that basicly should be in mydestination (tip here is that domains in this lists cant be used in public) to make system accounts works in public use virtual alias mapping This part always confuses me in Postfix. how ? have you edit relay as suggested ?, if yes what error is there now ? So I modified my recipient restrictions: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access, check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access, check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access, permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_pipelining, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_unauth_destination, reject_unknown_helo_hostname check_policy_service unix:postgrey/socket, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, #reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net, reject_rbl_client dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net, reject_rbl_client dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net, reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, reject_unlisted_recipient, reject_unverified_recipient, permit by adding the sender_access lines. This seems to help. I realize I have two check_recipient_access lines. Is this an issue.
Re: Bombarded With Spam
Kirk Bocek skrev den 2017-09-25 00:21: Several complex things are happening. I need to accept mail from localhost for messages from an array controller. This host needs to relay mail from workstations on the LAN. This host is also accepting mail from several listed domains via the router. grep bocek.org main.cf | wc -l simple rule is that domain names is final destination for postfix, so if you have bocek.org in mydestination AND in virtual_domain it does not work as you want keep mydestination as minimal as possible, and then all public domains as virtual you get more control of what happens, aswell for system accouns that basicly should be in mydestination (tip here is that domains in this lists cant be used in public) to make system accounts works in public use virtual alias mapping This part always confuses me in Postfix. how ? have you edit relay as suggested ?, if yes what error is there now ?
Re: Postfix Mailrules from diffrend Source Systems
thx Victor -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
