Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
%install
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/lib sh postfix-install -package -non-interactive
install_root=%{buildroot} config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
Am 12.02.2015 um 11:20 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
has somebody an idea for the chicken egg problem that postfix-install
in the %installof a RPM-spec can't load the shared libraries which are
built but not installed at that moment?
+ sh postfix-install -non-interactive
install_root=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-1.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64
config_directory=/etc/postfix meta_directory=/usr/libexec/postfix
daemon_directory=/usr/libexec/postfix command_directory=/usr/sbin
queue_directory=/var/spool/postfix data_directory=/var/lib/postfix
sendmail_path=/usr/sbin/sendmail newaliases_path=/usr/bin/newaliases
mailq_path=/usr/bin/mailq mail_owner=postfix setgid_group=postdrop
manpage_directory=/usr/share/man
sample_directory=/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0/samples
readme_directory=/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0/README_FILES
bin/postconf: error while loading shared libraries:
libpostfix-global.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
bin/postconf: error while loading shared libraries:
libpostfix-global.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
_
%build
CCARGS=-fPIC -DNO_NIS -DNO_NISPLUS -DNO_EAI -DNO_LMDB -DNO_CDB
-DNO_LDAP -DNO_PGSQL -DNO_SQLITE -DHAS_PCRE -I%{_includedir}/pcre
-DHAS_MYSQL -I%{_includedir}/mysql -DUSE_TLS -DUSE_SASL_AUTH
-DUSE_CYRUS_SASL -I%{_includedir}/sasl
-DDEF_CONFIG_DIR=\\\%{postfix_config_dir}\\\
-DDEF_META_DIR=\\\%{postfix_daemon_dir}\\\
AUXLIBS=-lpcre -L%{_libdir}/mysql -lmysqlclient -lm -L%{_libdir}/sasl2
-lsasl2 -lssl -lcrypto -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,relro,-z,noexecstack
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} -f Makefile.init makefiles shared=yes
CCARGS=${CCARGS} AUXLIBS=${AUXLIBS} DEBUG= OPT=%{optflags}
-Wno-comment -fno-strict-aliasing
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} CCARGS=${CCARGS} AUXLIBS=${AUXLIBS}
DEBUG= OPT=%{optflags} -Wno-comment -fno-strict-aliasing
%install
sh postfix-install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
install -c auxiliary/rmail/rmail %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/rmail
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
On 02/12/2015 11:20 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
has somebody an idea for the chicken egg problem that postfix-install
in the %installof a RPM-spec can't load the shared libraries which are
built but not installed at that moment?
I changed it to make non-interactive-package and it works just fine
without the library issues:
make non-interactive-package \
install_root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} \
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} \
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir} \
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} \
data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir} \
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail.postfix \
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases.postfix \
mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq.postfix \
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} \
setgid_group=%{maildrop_group} \
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} \
sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir} \
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions
besides that SPEC is derived from Redhat ones years ago using make
install seems to change the whole semantic of what is happening in the
%install section
The Postfix installation procedure as documented installs Postfix
without the problems that you keep reporting.
The RELEASE_NOTES say at the top of the file, to avoid massive
frustration I will not repeat that text here, but summarize
it as YOU IGNORE INSTRUCTIONS, YOU GET NO SUPPORT.
Wietse
there is *nothing* but empty folders - so where does it install to?
also tried with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -non-interactive
___
looks like postfix-install is *not* called with all the makro-params
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
shlib_directory=${shlib_directory:-`LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
bin/postconf -dhx shlib_directory`} /bin/sh postfix-install
*these* are important for the package building process:
-package -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir}
___
[builduser@testserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ ls -R
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/:
total 12K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 etc
drwxr-xr-x 4 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 usr
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 var
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 pam.d
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc/pam.d:
total 4.0K
-rw-r--r-- 1 builduser builduser 76 2015-02-12 14:26 smtp.postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr:
total 8.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 lib64
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 share
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64/postfix:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 doc
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix-3.0.0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 examples
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0/examples:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 spool
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 15 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool/postfix:
total 52K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 active
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 bounce
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 corrupt
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 defer
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 deferred
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 flush
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 incoming
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 maildrop
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 pid
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions
besides that SPEC is derived from Redhat ones years ago using make
install seems to change the whole semantic of what is happening in the
%install section
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
i did that as you can see on bottom if the message you responded to
make install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net:
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
i did that as you can see on bottom if the message you responded to
make install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
I want you to execute the command without rpmbuild crap, and if
that command without rpmbuild crap does not work, then I will try
to find out why that command without rpmbuild crap does not work.
Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions
besides that SPEC is derived from Redhat ones years ago using make
install seems to change the whole semantic of what is happening in the
%install section
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
Wietse
The Postfix installation procedure as documented installs Postfix
without the problems that you keep reporting.
The RELEASE_NOTES say at the top of the file, to avoid massive
frustration I will not repeat that text here, but summarize
it as YOU IGNORE INSTRUCTIONS, YOU GET NO SUPPORT.
Wietse
there is *nothing* but empty folders - so where does it install to?
also tried with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -non-interactive
___
looks like postfix-install is *not* called with all the makro-params
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
shlib_directory=${shlib_directory:-`LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
bin/postconf -dhx shlib_directory`} /bin/sh postfix-install
*these* are important for the package building process:
-package -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir}
___
[builduser@testserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ ls -R
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/:
total 12K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 etc
drwxr-xr-x 4 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 usr
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 var
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 pam.d
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc/pam.d:
total 4.0K
-rw-r--r-- 1 builduser builduser 76 2015-02-12 14:26 smtp.postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr:
total 8.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 lib64
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 share
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64/postfix:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 doc
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix-3.0.0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 examples
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0/examples:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 spool
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 15 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool/postfix:
total 52K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 active
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 bounce
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 corrupt
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 defer
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 deferred
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 flush
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
This is the tricks for rpmbuild. postconf relies on
%{postfix_lib_dir}libpostfix-global.so for postfix-install.
- - postfix.spec --
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{postfix_lib_dir}
if [ ! -f %{postfix_lib_dir}/libpostfix-global.so ] ; then
mkdir -p %{postfix_lib_dir}
install lib/libpostfix-global.so %{postfix_lib_dir}
install lib/libpostfix-util.so %{postfix_lib_dir}
fi
sh postfix-install -non-interactive \
install_root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} \
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} \
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir} \
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} \
data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir} \
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail.postfix \
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases.postfix \
mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq.postfix \
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} \
setgid_group=%{maildrop_group} \
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} \
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} \
sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir} \
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} \
shlib_directory=%{postfix_lib_dir} \
|| exit 1
---end --
Have fun.
On 02/12/2015 09:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions
besides that SPEC is derived from Redhat ones years ago using make
install seems to change the whole semantic of what is happening in the
%install section
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
Wietse
The Postfix installation procedure as documented installs Postfix
without the problems that you keep reporting.
The RELEASE_NOTES say at the top of the file, to avoid massive
frustration I will not repeat that text here, but summarize
it as YOU IGNORE INSTRUCTIONS, YOU GET NO SUPPORT.
Wietse
there is *nothing* but empty folders - so where does it install to?
also tried with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -non-interactive
___
looks like postfix-install is *not* called with all the makro-params
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
shlib_directory=${shlib_directory:-`LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
bin/postconf -dhx shlib_directory`} /bin/sh postfix-install
*these* are important for the package building process:
-package -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir}
___
[builduser@testserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ ls -R
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/:
total 12K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 etc
drwxr-xr-x 4 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 usr
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 var
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 pam.d
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc/pam.d:
total 4.0K
-rw-r--r-- 1 builduser builduser 76 2015-02-12 14:26 smtp.postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr:
total 8.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 lib64
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 share
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64/postfix:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 doc
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix-3.0.0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick
shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own?
You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly.
You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions
besides that SPEC is derived from Redhat ones years ago using make
install seems to change the whole semantic of what is happening in the
%install section
there is *nothing* but empty folders - so where does it install to?
also tried with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -non-interactive
___
looks like postfix-install is *not* called with all the makro-params
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
shlib_directory=${shlib_directory:-`LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
bin/postconf -dhx shlib_directory`} /bin/sh postfix-install
*these* are important for the package building process:
-package -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir}
___
[builduser@testserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ ls -R
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/:
total 12K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 etc
drwxr-xr-x 4 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 usr
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 var
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 pam.d
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/etc/pam.d:
total 4.0K
-rw-r--r-- 1 builduser builduser 76 2015-02-12 14:26 smtp.postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr:
total 8.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 lib64
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 share
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/lib64/postfix:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 doc
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix-3.0.0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 examples
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/usr/share/doc/postfix-3.0.0/examples:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 3 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 spool
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool:
total 4.0K
drwxr-xr-x 15 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 postfix
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool/postfix:
total 52K
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 active
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 bounce
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 corrupt
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 defer
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 deferred
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 flush
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 incoming
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 maildrop
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 pid
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 private
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 public
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 saved
drwxr-xr-x 2 builduser builduser 4.0K 2015-02-12 14:26 trace
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool/postfix/active:
total 0
/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/postfix-3.0.0-4.fc21.20150212.rh.x86_64/var/spool/postfix/bounce:
total 0
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own? You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly. You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source could face them I provide the interfaces. It is your job to choose the right one. not when you say You MUST use THAT because if i try to mangle that because it just don't work you would repsond did i say this and that? Without a clear statement what you want (build installable package) I have to guess that you want to install Postfix. The supported interface is make whatever. People who grope under that interface are lucky if I provide any support at all. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:13 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:58:39PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
that below works like a charm:
make non-interactive-package install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
After this installs the bits Postfix always installs (that are
listed in the stock postfix-files):
* If you're building with dynamicmaps=yes and want to create
separate packages for the various database drivers, then
consider creating a per-driver .cf file in:
$meta_directory/dynamicmaps.cf.d/
listing just that table type and corresponding module path.
plus whatever logic you'll need to deliver the plugin module
and the corresponding dynamicmaps config snippet as a separate
package.
* If you want to install optional test bits:
posttls-finger, smtp-sink, smtp-source, ...
You'll have to copy those in yourself, and add them to postfix-files
or postfix-files.d/sub-package as appropriate
thanks for the hint, only everywhere used libraries are linked
the reason for shared=yes was more to get the single postfix binaries
smaller and using shared libraries for optimized memory usage
well, the manpages are already in a subpackage only installed on the
admin-machine instead everywhere
%files manpages
%{postfix_doc_dir}
%attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man1/*
%attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man5/*
%attr(0644, root, root) %{_mandir}/man8/*
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source could face them I provide the interfaces. It is your job to choose the right one. not when you say You MUST use THAT because if i try to mangle that because it just don't work you would repsond did i say this and that? Without a clear statement what you want (build installable package) I have to guess that you want to install Postfix. The supported interface is make whatever. People who grope under that interface are lucky if I provide any support at all. can we stop that discussion and both admit that we handeled the issue not really good? Without a clear statement what you want when the subject begins with rpmbuild? seriously? :-)
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install name=value
i did that as you can see on bottom if the message you responded to
make install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
interesting attitude in context of subject rpmbuild and shared=yes
I want you to execute the command without rpmbuild crap, and if
that command without rpmbuild crap does not work, then I will try
to find out why that command without rpmbuild crap does not work.
%{whatever} is replaced by the makros defined on top of the SPEC to
write paths just once and re-use them, they are simply replaced
frankly for any other package you use make install
DESTDIR=%{buildroot} which installs the already compiled binaries in
buildroot and that's it, the paths are defined by ./configure
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: No, I said: make install name=value without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support rcpmbuild crap. interesting attitude in context of subject rpmbuild and shared=yes Please stick to the supported interfaces: make makefiles name=value... make make install name=value... make upgrade name=value... etcetera Where is your make command without rpmbuild crap? I am willing to provide support at that level. I do not provide support at the level of RedHat, Debian, Solaris, *BSD, or Apple package managers. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which
*both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for
interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades
would make install just work non-interactive problem gone
# make install (interactive version, first time install)
# make upgrade (non-interactive version, for upgrades)
pretty sure the reason why Redhat is using postfix-install while for
all other packages make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} is in use
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:00 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Instead of sh postfix-install name=value use make install
name=value
i did that as you can see on bottom if the message you responded to
make install -non-interactive install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
interesting attitude in context of subject rpmbuild and shared=yes
I want you to execute the command without rpmbuild crap, and if
that command without rpmbuild crap does not work, then I will try
to find out why that command without rpmbuild crap does not work.
%{whatever} is replaced by the makros defined on top of the SPEC to
write paths just once and re-use them, they are simply replaced
frankly for any other package you use make install
DESTDIR=%{buildroot} which installs the already compiled binaries in
buildroot and that's it, the paths are defined by ./configure
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
interesting attitude in context of subject rpmbuild and shared=yes
Please stick to the supported interfaces:
make makefiles name=value...
make
make install name=value...
make upgrade name=value...
etcetera
Where is your make command without rpmbuild crap? I am willing
to provide support at that level. I do not provide support at the
level of RedHat, Debian, Solaris, *BSD, or Apple package managers
the *real problem* is that make install is *interactive* and the
non-interactive make upgrade can't work at all while make install
-non-interactive talks about nothing to do for update
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} is *notging else* than
config_directory=/etc/postfix and i replaced *long before* make
install will be called
the whole purpose of a rpmbuild is to install into an *always empty*
tree as ordinary user and after that pack that tree with all folders,
files and permissions into an archive
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Andrew Ho: sh postfix-install -non-interactive \ THIS IS NOT SUPPORTED. USE MAKE INSTALL. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which *both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades would make install just work non-interactive problem gone # make install (interactive version, first time install) # make upgrade (non-interactive version, for upgrades) The only difference between install and upgrade is that one is interactive and the other is not. That is, install is an upgrade from zero with all the answers pre-determined. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which
*both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for
interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades
would make install just work non-interactive problem gone
# make install (interactive version, first time install)
# make upgrade (non-interactive version, for upgrades)
The only difference between install and upgrade is that one is
interactive and the other is not. That is, install is an upgrade
from zero with all the answers pre-determined
make install -non-interactive simply ends in *nothing* installed into
the build-tree nor somewhere else
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/fsstone]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/smtpstone]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/sendmail]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/error]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/pickup]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/cleanup]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/smtpd]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/local]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/trivial-rewrite]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/qmgr]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/oqmgr]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/smtp]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/bounce]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/pipe]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/showq]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postalias]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postcat]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postconf]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postdrop]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postkick]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postlock]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postlog]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postmap]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postqueue]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postsuper]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/qmqpd]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/spawn]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/flush]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/verify]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/virtual]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/proxymap]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/anvil]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/scache]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/discard]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/tlsmgr]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postmulti]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/postscreen]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/dnsblog]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/tlsproxy]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
[src/posttls-finger]
make: Nothing to be done for 'update'.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
shlib_directory=${shlib_directory:-`LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/postfix-3.0.0/lib
bin/postconf -dhx shlib_directory`} /bin/sh \
postfix-install
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: [ Charset windows-1252 converted... ] Am 12.02.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: the most likely reason is make install versus make upgrade which *both* don't apply for a rpmbuild because there is no business for interactive and no business for non-interactive version, for upgrades would make install just work non-interactive problem gone # make install (interactive version, first time install) # make upgrade (non-interactive version, for upgrades) The only difference between install and upgrade is that one is interactive and the other is not. That is, install is an upgrade from zero with all the answers pre-determined make install -non-interactive simply ends in *nothing* installed into the build-tree nor somewhere else Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive? As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive install. Therefore: make upgrade name=value ... Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:29:37PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: The only difference between install and upgrade is that one is interactive and the other is not. That is, install is an upgrade from zero with all the answers pre-determined make install -non-interactive simply ends in *nothing* installed into the build-tree nor somewhere else The -non-interactive option is postfix-install command-line argument, it is NOT a make argument. The Postfix Makefile contains the following relevant targets: install: update $(SHLIB_ENV) shlib_directory=$(SHLIB_DIR_OVERRIDE) $(SHELL) \ postfix-install package: update $(SHLIB_ENV) shlib_directory=$(SHLIB_DIR_OVERRIDE) $(SHELL) \ postfix-install -package upgrade: update $(SHLIB_ENV) shlib_directory=$(SHLIB_DIR_OVERRIDE) $(SHELL) \ postfix-install -non-interactive non-interactive-package: update $(SHLIB_ENV) shlib_directory=$(SHLIB_DIR_OVERRIDE) $(SHELL) \ postfix-install -non-interactive -package For non-interactive building of packages use: http://www.postfix.org/PACKAGE_README.html If you want to fully automate this process, specify all the non-default installation parameters on the command line: % make non-interactive-package install_root=/some/where... With Postfix versions before 2.2 you must invoke the post-install script directly (% sh post-install -non-interactive install_root...). With Postfix 3.0 and later, the command make package name=value ... will replace the string MAIL_VERSION in a configuration parameter value with the Postfix release version. Do not try to specify something like $mail_version on this command line. This produces inconsistent results with different versions of the make(1) command. This was even updated for 3.0. -- Viktor.
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive? As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive install. I believe he does not want an install (directly to the final locations), he wants a package build, therefore as per my other email. -- Viktor.
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 16:43 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive?
As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive
install.
I believe he does not want an install (directly to the final
locations), he wants a package build, therefore as per my other
email
thank you!
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it
works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source
could face them
that below works like a charm:
make non-interactive-package install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}
meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
now it's also clear from where the postfix-install call is coming and
since it worked for many years and also 3.0 without shared, well..
With Postfix versions before 2.2 you must invoke the post-install script
directly (% sh post-install -non-interactive install_root...)
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Wietse Venema: Viktor Dukhovni: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive? As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive install. I believe he does not want an install (directly to the final locations), he wants a package build, therefore as per my other email. And this is supported as well. I can provide the necessary interfaces (lead the horse to the water) but I can't force people to use them (drink the water) that is all true - but you could give the correct answer or none when somebody posts the *working* solution he found out by himself instead a wrong one with a big fat You MUST use - your repsone below was wrong and leaded to all the other try around and ping pong frankly *i had the build running* and so answered my own question with the intention others with the same problems can find that information later and got corrected with non working instructions that is not helpful Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes Datum: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:12:44 -0500 (EST) Von: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org An: li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net Kopie (CC): postfix-users@postfix.org li...@rhsoft.net: well, set LD_LIBRARY_PATH does the trick shoudn't postfix-install do that on it's own? You MUST NOT invoke postfix-install directly. You MUST use make install as described in the INSTALL instructions.
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Viktor Dukhovni: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:40:47AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote: Where did I tell you to make install -non-interactive? As I explained above, use make upgrade you want a non-interactive install. I believe he does not want an install (directly to the final locations), he wants a package build, therefore as per my other email. And this is supported as well. I can provide the necessary interfaces (lead the horse to the water) but I can't force people to use them (drink the water). Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source could face them I provide the interfaces. It is your job to choose the right one. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source could face them I provide the interfaces. It is your job to choose the right one. not when you say You MUST use THAT because if i try to mangle that because it just don't work you would repsond did i say this and that?
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:58:39PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
that below works like a charm:
make non-interactive-package install_root=%{buildroot}
config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir} meta_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir}
daemon_directory=%{postfix_daemon_dir} shlib_directory=%{postfix_shlib_dir}
command_directory=%{postfix_command_dir}
queue_directory=%{postfix_queue_dir} data_directory=%{postfix_data_dir}
sendmail_path=%{postfix_command_dir}/sendmail
newaliases_path=%{_bindir}/newaliases mailq_path=%{_bindir}/mailq
mail_owner=%{postfix_user} setgid_group=%{maildrop_group}
manpage_directory=%{_mandir} sample_directory=%{postfix_sample_dir}
readme_directory=%{postfix_readme_dir} || exit 1
After this installs the bits Postfix always installs (that are
listed in the stock postfix-files):
* If you're building with dynamicmaps=yes and want to create
separate packages for the various database drivers, then
consider creating a per-driver .cf file in:
$meta_directory/dynamicmaps.cf.d/
listing just that table type and corresponding module path.
plus whatever logic you'll need to deliver the plugin module
and the corresponding dynamicmaps config snippet as a separate
package.
* If you want to install optional test bits:
posttls-finger, smtp-sink, smtp-source, ...
You'll have to copy those in yourself, and add them to postfix-files
or postfix-files.d/sub-package as appropriate.
--
Viktor.
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
li...@rhsoft.net: Am 12.02.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: li...@rhsoft.net: according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source could face them I provide the interfaces. It is your job to choose the right one. not when you say You MUST use THAT because if i try to mangle that because it just don't work you would repsond did i say this and that? Without a clear statement what you want (build installable package) I have to guess that you want to install Postfix. The supported interface is make whatever. People who grope under that interface are lucky if I provide any support at all. can we stop that discussion and both admit that we handeled the issue not really good? Without a clear statement what you want when the subject begins with rpmbuild? seriously? :-) You are like people who ask I use Sendmail or qmail or Exim feature X, how do I do that with Postfix?, without a clear statement of what X does. I am not interested in how rpmbuild works. Wietse
Re: rpmbuild and shared=yes
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:33 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 12.02.2015 um 17:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
according to the subject a You MUST use make non-interactive-package
would have saved a lot of noise including the completly unnecessary
flames about rpm crap without *by all respect* no clue about how it
works and that the macros are replaced before any bit of postfix source
could face them
I provide the interfaces. It is your job to choose the right one.
not when you say You MUST use THAT because if i try to mangle that
because it just don't work you would repsond did i say this and that?
Without a clear statement what you want (build installable package)
I have to guess that you want to install Postfix. The supported
interface is make whatever. People who grope under that interface
are lucky if I provide any support at all.
can we stop that discussion and both admit that we handeled the issue
not really good? Without a clear statement what you want when the
subject begins with rpmbuild? seriously? :-)
You are like people who ask I use Sendmail or qmail or Exim feature
X, how do I do that with Postfix?, without a clear statement of
what X does. I am not interested in how rpmbuild works.
well, you are not able to admit a mistake, so be it
Without a clear statement what you want (build installable package) is
ridiculous because rpmbuild is an as clear as possible statement that
the goal is build installable package as well you do not need to be
interested in how rpmbuild works
but than you should not insist in remove the crap of macros while the
person on the other side is knowing how it works and that there is no
technical differene between something=/path/ or something=%{path_macro}
besides you have to type that only once on top, reuse it in the rest of
the file and if you change a value it's consistent everywhere
