Re: migrating to IMAP

2010-11-22 Thread MiB


20 nov 2010 kl. 19.56 H.R. Riggs wrote:

Is there an easy way to migrate to IMAP? That is, to get all my  
messages

from my desktop machine (that I've collected over the years using POP)
onto the IMAP account (gmail), with all the many, many folders?

Thanks.

Ron




forward it.

/MB






Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread A Sanna
Is there a way to delete a message's attachments when deleting the
message itself?   My Downloads folder seems to get clogged with junk GIF's.

Tony
--
Anthony R. Sanna
SACO Foods, Inc.
1-800-373-7226
asa...@sacofoods.com




Re: sent messages with IMAP

2010-11-22 Thread MiB


21 nov 2010 kl. 08.11 skrev Beatrix Willius:

No, Sent messages should show up on every client. And really don't  
do Gmail with IMAP. Their IMAP implementation is weird.


It works really well with real IMAP clients. You actually find *that*  
weird or is it really PowerMail´s limited abilities?



Besides with Gmail there isn't a big difference between IMAP and POP.

On 21.11.2010, at 03:19, H.R. Riggs wrote:

I'm trying to figure out IMAP and it seems that the following is  
true.


Let's say I sent a message from PM using the IMAP account. The  
message

shows up in my Sent message folder on PM. It also shows up in my Sent
message folder in the IMAP account (in this case, Gmail). But it  
doesn't

look like the client sees that folder. So, e.g., if I go to another
machine and use an email client, whether it be PM, or Outlook or  
Mail, I

won't see that sent message. Is that correct?


Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards

Trixi Willius

http://www.mothsoftware.com
Mail Archiver X: archive, clean and search email
http://www.beatrixwillius.de
Fractals, 3d landscapes etc.




/MB






powermail-discuss Digest #2903 - 11/22/10

2010-11-22 Thread PowerMail discussions
powermail-discuss Digest #2903 - Monday, November 22, 2010

  Re: migrating to IMAP
  by H.R. Riggs ri...@hawaii.edu
  Earthlink/Powermail issues
  by Evan Evanson eevan...@sprintmail.com
  Re: Earthlink/Powermail issues
  by Evan Evanson eevan...@sprintmail.com
  Re: migrating to IMAP
  by MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com
  Deleting Attachments
  by A Sanna asa...@sacofoods.com
  Re: sent messages with IMAP
  by MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com
  Re: Deleting Attachments
  by Michael J. Hußmann mich...@michael-hussmann.de


--

Subject: Re: migrating to IMAP
From: H.R. Riggs ri...@hawaii.edu
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:07:44 -1000



Beatrix Willius wrote on 11/21/10 at 9:12 PM:

Hi H.R.,

haven't tried it for IMAP but in general the tool is good:

http://www.weirdkid.com/products/emailchemy/index.html

This doesn't seem to work with Powermail. At least, PM is not an option.



The problem will be the odd 2 GB limit of PM.

On 20.11.2010, at 19:56, H.R. Riggs wrote:

 Is there an easy way to migrate to IMAP? That is, to get all my messages
 from my desktop machine (that I've collected over the years using POP)
 onto the IMAP account (gmail), with all the many, many folders?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards

Trixi Willius

http://www.mothsoftware.com
Mail Archiver X: archive, clean and search email
http://www.beatrixwillius.de
Fractals, 3d landscapes etc.





--

Subject: Earthlink/Powermail issues
From: Evan Evanson eevan...@sprintmail.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:18:39 -0600

I'm wondering if anyone can help me with this - I'm in the process of
switching ISPs, from Earthlink to Charter, but was planning on keeping
my Earthlink email address for a while to smooth the transition.
Unfortunately, I don't seem to be able to connect to Earthlink's SMTP
server when I'm

a) using PowerMail, and
b) using Charter as my ISP.

I had noticed this before when travelling - I could receive email, but
not send it. The workaround was to use Earthlink's web mail client to
send emails, which was a pain, because I would forget the problem until
I encountered an issue, then had to cut-and-paste from PowerMail to the
browser.

The weird wrinkle is that this seems to be a PowerMail issue. Witness
this email, sent using Thunderbird, using Charter to connect to
Earthlink's SMTP server. I've check, double-check, and triple-checked
the SMTP settings in PowerMail, even cutting-and-pasting all settings
from Thunderbird to PowerMail, but PowerMail simply won't connect to
Earthlink's server. In fact, if I leave the password field blank in
PowerMail, it never prompts me for the password, it simply times out
attempting to send the message.

I called Earthlink customer support, and true to form they simply told
me that my only option when not using Earthlink as my ISP was to use the
web mail client, as they are blocking all wireless servers. Which is
patent nonsense in addition to being wrong, since as I stated before,
this email is being sent through my home wireless network, using Charter
as the ISP.

Hoping somebody's already found the solution,
Evan Evanson
PowerMail user since 2002

--

Subject: Re: Earthlink/Powermail issues
From: Evan Evanson eevan...@sprintmail.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:49:33 -0600

D'oh! Got it sorted out. Turns out there's a setting in Setup  Mail
Scheduling  Locations that will over-ride your outgoing mail settings
in every account, and that had erroneous authentication info.

Thank you for allowing me to waste everyone's time.

Evan Evanson

On 11/21/10 15:18 , Evan Evanson wrote:
 I'm wondering if anyone can help me with this - I'm in the process of
 switching ISPs, from Earthlink to Charter, but was planning on keeping
 my Earthlink email address for a while to smooth the transition.
 Unfortunately, I don't seem to be able to connect to Earthlink's SMTP
 server when I'm

 a) using PowerMail, and
 b) using Charter as my ISP.

 I had noticed this before when travelling - I could receive email, but
 not send it. The workaround was to use Earthlink's web mail client to
 send emails, which was a pain, because I would forget the problem
 until I encountered an issue, then had to cut-and-paste from PowerMail
 to the browser.

 The weird wrinkle is that this seems to be a PowerMail issue. Witness
 this email, sent using Thunderbird, using Charter to connect to
 Earthlink's SMTP server. I've check, double-check, and triple-checked
 the SMTP settings in PowerMail, even cutting-and-pasting all settings
 from Thunderbird to PowerMail, but PowerMail simply won't connect to
 Earthlink's server. In fact, if I leave the password field blank in
 PowerMail, it never prompts me for the password, it simply times out
 attempting to send the message.

 I called Earthlink 

Re: Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread Don Zahniser
On 11/22/10, A Sanna wrote:

Is there a way to delete a message's attachments when deleting the
message itself?   My Downloads folder seems to get clogged with junk GIF's.


If I understand correctly, PowerMail is supposed to delete attachments
when the message is deleted.  
What I think happens in practice, is that the attachment is deleted when
PowerMail's Mail Trash is emptied.

So, look in the Attachments folder, delete all Spam messages, empty
PowerMail's Mail Trash, and for good measure quit PowerMail, then check
the Attachments folder again.

 - Don




Re(2): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread George Henne
On 11/22/10, A Sanna wrote:

Is there a way to delete a message's attachments when deleting the
message itself?   My Downloads folder seems to get clogged with junk GIF's.

I have 13,795 items in my Attachments folders, going back to 2003. I'm
convinced that many of them are orphans. I wish there was a way to clean
them out.




Re(3): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread Peter Lovell
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, George Henne g...@nsbasic.com wrote:

I have 13,795 items in my Attachments folders, going back to 2003. I'm
convinced that many of them are orphans. I wish there was a way to clean
them out.

I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?

Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?

Cheers.Peter




Re: Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread A Sanna
If I understand correctly, PowerMail is supposed to delete attachments
when the message is deleted.

Not always true.  I have certain groups of files that come attached to
messages that are never deleted, although the message is never opened or
read.

Tony
--
Anthony R. Sanna
SACO Foods, Inc.
1-800-373-7226
asa...@sacofoods.com




Re(4): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread CTM info
Peter,

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31:49 -0500, Peter Lovell plov...@mac.com wrote:

I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?

Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?

The behavior is that message moved to PowerMail's mail trash should see
their attachments moved to the Finder trash upon emptying PowerMail's
trash. This was done so that there would be two layers of protection
against inadvertant destruction of attachments.

And no, there is no way to identify orphans since, precisely, they are
orphaned.

What I do use to keep the Mail Attachments folder under control is the
Find duplicates feature of FileBuddy, which will compare the dataforks
of attachments by content and let you select for instance only the
newest ones, then delete them in one go. This will at least get rid of
duplicates, with however the risk that one of the duplicate files may be
the file referenced by a message as its attachment.

Regards,

jean michel




Re: Re(4): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread Mirko Kranenburg
What about exporting as PowerMail Exchange including attachments, the deleting 
the whole lot and importing again?
It is a bit a roundabout way, and it will take a lot of time for a large 
archive, but it should work, or am I wrong?

Mirko

On 22 nov 2010, at 23:24, CTM info wrote:

 Peter,
 
 On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31:49 -0500, Peter Lovell plov...@mac.com wrote:
 
 I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?
 
 Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?
 
 The behavior is that message moved to PowerMail's mail trash should see
 their attachments moved to the Finder trash upon emptying PowerMail's
 trash. This was done so that there would be two layers of protection
 against inadvertant destruction of attachments.
 
 And no, there is no way to identify orphans since, precisely, they are
 orphaned.
 
 What I do use to keep the Mail Attachments folder under control is the
 Find duplicates feature of FileBuddy, which will compare the dataforks
 of attachments by content and let you select for instance only the
 newest ones, then delete them in one go. This will at least get rid of
 duplicates, with however the risk that one of the duplicate files may be
 the file referenced by a message as its attachment.
 
 Regards,
 
 jean michel
 
 




Re(6): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread CTM info
Mirko,

Funny that you should have thought of that and mentioned it here. I
started to type a similar suggestion in my previous message, only to
delete it before sending: figured that I'd get in a whole lot of trouble
if I were the one to suggest this and for some reason something didn't
work in the process.

But hey, since you were the one suggested it, then it surely  must be
worth a try ! ;-)

jean michel

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:30:21 +0100, Mirko Kranenburg
mirko.li...@gmail.com wrote:

What about exporting as PowerMail Exchange including attachments, the
deleting the whole lot and importing again?
It is a bit a roundabout way, and it will take a lot of time for a large
archive, but it should work, or am I wrong?

Mirko

On 22 nov 2010, at 23:24, CTM info wrote:

 Peter,

 On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31:49 -0500, Peter Lovell plov...@mac.com wrote:

 I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?

 Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?

 The behavior is that message moved to PowerMail's mail trash should see
 their attachments moved to the Finder trash upon emptying PowerMail's
 trash. This was done so that there would be two layers of protection
 against inadvertant destruction of attachments.

 And no, there is no way to identify orphans since, precisely, they are
 orphaned.

 What I do use to keep the Mail Attachments folder under control is the
 Find duplicates feature of FileBuddy, which will compare the dataforks
 of attachments by content and let you select for instance only the
 newest ones, then delete them in one go. This will at least get rid of
 duplicates, with however the risk that one of the duplicate files may be
 the file referenced by a message as its attachment.

 Regards,

 jean michel









Re(7): Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread George Henne
Sounds workable - but is Microsoft Exchange the most reliable to export/
import to?

Mirko,

Funny that you should have thought of that and mentioned it here. I
started to type a similar suggestion in my previous message, only to
delete it before sending: figured that I'd get in a whole lot of trouble
if I were the one to suggest this and for some reason something didn't
work in the process.

But hey, since you were the one suggested it, then it surely  must be
worth a try ! ;-)

jean michel

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:30:21 +0100, Mirko Kranenburg
mirko.li...@gmail.com wrote:

What about exporting as PowerMail Exchange including attachments, the
deleting the whole lot and importing again?
It is a bit a roundabout way, and it will take a lot of time for a large
archive, but it should work, or am I wrong?

Mirko

On 22 nov 2010, at 23:24, CTM info wrote:

 Peter,

 On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31:49 -0500, Peter Lovell plov...@mac.com wrote:

 I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?

 Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?

 The behavior is that message moved to PowerMail's mail trash should see
 their attachments moved to the Finder trash upon emptying PowerMail's
 trash. This was done so that there would be two layers of protection
 against inadvertant destruction of attachments.

 And no, there is no way to identify orphans since, precisely, they are
 orphaned.

 What I do use to keep the Mail Attachments folder under control is the
 Find duplicates feature of FileBuddy, which will compare the dataforks
 of attachments by content and let you select for instance only the
 newest ones, then delete them in one go. This will at least get rid of
 duplicates, with however the risk that one of the duplicate files may be
 the file referenced by a message as its attachment.

 Regards,

 jean michel












Re: Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread C. A. Niemiec
I have 13,795 items in my Attachments folders, going back to 2003. I'm
convinced that many of them are orphans. I wish there was a way to clean
them out.

I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?

Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?

Is there is any technical problem to putting all the attachments for
each message in its own folder? Name the folder with some combination of
message subject and date/timestamp received.

This would prevent the need to rename attachments. If you find what you
think is an orphaned attachment set, you have a clue to what the
original message is, and if it's junk you can be rid of it all by
deleting just one folder.

Can metadata be set in the Finder on that folder in such a way that
Spotlight will see that it is attached to a particular PowerMail
message? Could FoxTrot use this kind of logic (maybe it does)?

Here's another idea that perhaps could be done if attachments were
stored in folders: an AppleScript that goes through your messages and
finds the corresponding folder of its attachments and sets the Finder
label to what you choose. Then you know which folders are orphaned by
seeing which ones are not labeled.

If one actually uses Finder labels for some other purpose here, do not
change label if already labeled criterion, etc.

Hrm. 13.932 items in my Attachments folder. That's quite a spin of the
ol' beachball to see the list in the Finder. I can't imagine an
Attachments folder with fewer folders (than that number of files) would
be worse.

Chris
--





Re: Deleting Attachments

2010-11-22 Thread Tim Lapin
Interesting idea, Chris.  Metadata or folders could solve the issue.  Of the 
two, the metadata idea seems more efficient.  One of the big problems with 
attachments are all those image files that are included in HTML style mail: 
such as little emoticons, stuff in the headers and footers and even background 
images.

Perhaps a better idea would be to maintain a separate index file for the 
attachments.  Basically a simple database, each record would include sufficient 
info to recreate the links to a specific email message.  That way a simple 
search for subject or date would be all that is required to determine whether 
or not a given attachment is orphaned and to which e-mail it once belonged.

As far as the spinning beach ball goes, I don't think it would be too bad.  I 
just checked my attachments folder.  It has just under 3,000 items and it took 
less than 5 seconds to display.  I have the last of the white iMacs (circa 
2007) with the maximum amount of RAM (3 to 4 GB).  Assuming an equivalent Mac, 
it should take less than 30 seconds to display just under 14,000 items.



--
Tim Lapin
t...@sympatico.ca




On 2010-11-22, at 9:23 PM, C. A. Niemiec wrote:

 I have 13,795 items in my Attachments folders, going back to 2003. I'm
 convinced that many of them are orphans. I wish there was a way to clean
 them out.
 
 I wonder if there's a way to identify orphans?
 
 Anyone know of one? Perhaps CTM has a suggestion?
 
 Is there is any technical problem to putting all the attachments for
 each message in its own folder? Name the folder with some combination of
 message subject and date/timestamp received.
 
 This would prevent the need to rename attachments. If you find what you
 think is an orphaned attachment set, you have a clue to what the
 original message is, and if it's junk you can be rid of it all by
 deleting just one folder.
 
 Can metadata be set in the Finder on that folder in such a way that
 Spotlight will see that it is attached to a particular PowerMail
 message? Could FoxTrot use this kind of logic (maybe it does)?
 
 Here's another idea that perhaps could be done if attachments were
 stored in folders: an AppleScript that goes through your messages and
 finds the corresponding folder of its attachments and sets the Finder
 label to what you choose. Then you know which folders are orphaned by
 seeing which ones are not labeled.
 
 If one actually uses Finder labels for some other purpose here, do not
 change label if already labeled criterion, etc.
 
 Hrm. 13.932 items in my Attachments folder. That's quite a spin of the
 ol' beachball to see the list in the Finder. I can't imagine an
 Attachments folder with fewer folders (than that number of files) would
 be worse.
 
 Chris
 --