RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
At 12:47 2019-01-10, Frank Cazabon wrote: All columns have different validation rules. There is no input mask to force the text column to only accept numbers. You can put alphabetic characters in there too. Then it uses the rule specified earlier by Gene. You can download it and look at it and read Gene's specification in his last message here. My spec was never intended to be bullet-proof, just adequate for a very basic but non-trivial grid. "non-trivial" means that it shows working and workable implementation some things of importance to me. I intend that numeric values be entered for numeric columns. Really, this is a simple example. Yes, I would have input masks in app code. Yes, I would have many other things as well. This is not app code. Anyone thinking that this code would be of use in a real app is overthinking the situation. Run and scream after looking at the code if you want. Print out a copy of the code, and burn it. Whatever you want. Thanks for you time, Frank and anyone else who has contributed. [snip] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/463275b5d647e6f1edf0e73149185b5d@mtlp85 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
At 12:39 2019-01-10, Frank Cazabon wrote: What control? The text? This is a quick knock up for Gene to check out, all I've put in is what he specifically asked for so it's a bare minimum thing. ... and that is exactly what I want. I want something simple enough that I can fairly easily rip it to pieces figuring out how it works but not so simplistic that it does not scale to something useful. I will check it out. Maybe, I will have missed a couple things that will come up later and need a bit more help, but maybe, at that point, I will be able to handle them myself. I do not expect people to put in a lot of work on this. I just need help out of the pit. I would be pleased to find that I can get Grid working as I need. I do not believe it yet, but I have always been willing. Remember that ~15 years some have mentioned? This is the first time I have gotten some Grid code to chew on. Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/b1ed754e8aac86bb0df894138918765c@mtlp84 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
At 12:23 2019-01-10, Richard Kaye wrote: Control not constrained to digits only? thetext is a character string. It is not constrained at all except by the validation that it can not be "". evennr and weirdnr are integers so digits (and signs) only. [snipped previous] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bd0b46f6bdabe4ec67dbdb4e60afb514@mtlp83 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
At 08:10 2019-01-10, Koen Piller wrote:
Frank,
Downloading and installing the file Gene.zip was easy done succesfull.
The form: I am not able to enter a value in column #Weird if I have entered
8 in the column text. Is that how it is supposed to work?
I came up with some simple rules to test validation. They are
arbitrary, but they are also simple. (No sense having them be
complicated for a proof of concept.)
Regarding weirdnr:
1) weirdnr is supposed to be divisible by 3.
2) It is also supposed to have the same even-oddness as the first
character of thetext.
Example 1: With thetext of "An example", "A" has a value of 65 which
is odd, so weirdnr must be odd. Since it must also be divisible by
3, it must be one of {3, 9, 15, ...} or the negative of one of them.
Example 2: With thetext of "Brilliant or bad example", "B" has a
value of 66 which is even, so weirdnr must be even. Since it must
also be divisible by 3, it must be one of {0, 6, 12, 18, ...} or the
negative of one of them.
The above assumes Frank implemented correctly what I asked for,
and for that matter, that I wrote what I intended. I have just
gotten home from work -- I am working full-time outside of IT -- and
have not looked at his code yet.
I might not get to look at it in detail for a few days. But I
will. This is the first potential grid example that works for my
value of "works". If I have been overlooking something, I want to
know about it.
Mind you, I am going to try to break it, too. I want something
solid and to know that I have something solid.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/6672ca8cca1bbfc4a0a209cc6ae65401@mtlp86
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Ah. OK. I was just tossing out a possible reason why it works for you but not Koen and "bad" data entry is the first thing that came to mind. Actually reviewing the code would mean I would have to ignore the day job... -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank Cazabon Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:48 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar All columns have different validation rules. There is no input mask to force the text column to only accept numbers. You can put alphabetic characters in there too. Then it uses the rule specified earlier by Gene. You can download it and look at it and read Gene's specification in his last message here. On 10 January 2019 16:43:54 GMT-04:00, Richard Kaye wrote: >The column with the valid rule. Is it only allowing digits to be >entered? I would expect a data type mismatch if it was allowing >anything other than digits. Maybe Koen is trying to type alpha >characters? > >-- > >rk > >-Original Message- >From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank >Cazabon >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:40 PM >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >Subject: RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar > >What control? The text? > >This is a quick knock up for Gene to check out, all I've put in is what >he specifically asked for so it's a bare minimum thing. > >On 10 January 2019 16:23:50 GMT-04:00, Richard Kaye > wrote: >>Control not constrained to digits only? >> >>-- >> >>rk >> >>-Original Message- >>From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank >>Cazabon >>Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:19 PM >>To: profoxt...@leafe.com >>Subject: Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar >> >>Give me examples of what you are entering. I enter The Text as 5, Even > >># as 2 and Weird # as 3 successfully because 5 % 2 = 1 and 3 % 2 = 1. >> >>Frank. >> >>Frank Cazabon >> >>On 10/01/2019 04:03 PM, Koen Piller wrote: >>> Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird >>> Regards >>> Koen >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7d475e50-5ab6-4025-8ab5-d9a4255b0...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. Report [OT] Abuse: http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/7d475e50-5ab6-4025-8ab5-d9a4255b0...@gmail.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bn6pr10mb1458b245a909fd0af3a4a1bdd2...@bn6pr10mb1458.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
All columns have different validation rules. There is no input mask to force the text column to only accept numbers. You can put alphabetic characters in there too. Then it uses the rule specified earlier by Gene. You can download it and look at it and read Gene's specification in his last message here. On 10 January 2019 16:43:54 GMT-04:00, Richard Kaye wrote: >The column with the valid rule. Is it only allowing digits to be >entered? I would expect a data type mismatch if it was allowing >anything other than digits. Maybe Koen is trying to type alpha >characters? > >-- > >rk > >-Original Message- >From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank >Cazabon >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:40 PM >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >Subject: RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar > >What control? The text? > >This is a quick knock up for Gene to check out, all I've put in is what >he specifically asked for so it's a bare minimum thing. > >On 10 January 2019 16:23:50 GMT-04:00, Richard Kaye > wrote: >>Control not constrained to digits only? >> >>-- >> >>rk >> >>-Original Message- >>From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank >>Cazabon >>Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:19 PM >>To: profoxt...@leafe.com >>Subject: Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar >> >>Give me examples of what you are entering. I enter The Text as 5, Even > >># as 2 and Weird # as 3 successfully because 5 % 2 = 1 and 3 % 2 = 1. >> >>Frank. >> >>Frank Cazabon >> >>On 10/01/2019 04:03 PM, Koen Piller wrote: >>> Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird >>> Regards >>> Koen >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7d475e50-5ab6-4025-8ab5-d9a4255b0...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
The column with the valid rule. Is it only allowing digits to be entered? I would expect a data type mismatch if it was allowing anything other than digits. Maybe Koen is trying to type alpha characters? -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank Cazabon Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:40 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar What control? The text? This is a quick knock up for Gene to check out, all I've put in is what he specifically asked for so it's a bare minimum thing. On 10 January 2019 16:23:50 GMT-04:00, Richard Kaye wrote: >Control not constrained to digits only? > >-- > >rk > >-Original Message- >From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank >Cazabon >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:19 PM >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >Subject: Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar > >Give me examples of what you are entering. I enter The Text as 5, Even ># as 2 and Weird # as 3 successfully because 5 % 2 = 1 and 3 % 2 = 1. > >Frank. > >Frank Cazabon > >On 10/01/2019 04:03 PM, Koen Piller wrote: >> Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird >> Regards >> Koen > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bn6pr10mb14581085fc3964bd7a6dc3efd2...@bn6pr10mb1458.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
What control? The text? This is a quick knock up for Gene to check out, all I've put in is what he specifically asked for so it's a bare minimum thing. On 10 January 2019 16:23:50 GMT-04:00, Richard Kaye wrote: >Control not constrained to digits only? > >-- > >rk > >-Original Message- >From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank >Cazabon >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:19 PM >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >Subject: Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar > >Give me examples of what you are entering. I enter The Text as 5, Even ># as 2 and Weird # as 3 successfully because 5 % 2 = 1 and 3 % 2 = 1. > >Frank. > >Frank Cazabon > >On 10/01/2019 04:03 PM, Koen Piller wrote: >> Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird >> Regards >> Koen > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/24bdb414-2dd1-4850-a56d-a657165e1...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Control not constrained to digits only? -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Frank Cazabon Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 3:19 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar Give me examples of what you are entering. I enter The Text as 5, Even # as 2 and Weird # as 3 successfully because 5 % 2 = 1 and 3 % 2 = 1. Frank. Frank Cazabon On 10/01/2019 04:03 PM, Koen Piller wrote: > Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird > Regards > Koen ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/bn6pr10mb145849ef6f95b7d9c69eb4f0d2...@bn6pr10mb1458.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Give me examples of what you are entering. I enter The Text as 5, Even # as 2 and Weird # as 3 successfully because 5 % 2 = 1 and 3 % 2 = 1. Frank. Frank Cazabon On 10/01/2019 04:03 PM, Koen Piller wrote: Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird Regards Koen Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 17:59 schreef Frank Cazabon There is validation according to Gene's rule: On 10/01/2019 12:10 PM, Koen Piller wrote: the row-level validation is: asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 Frank, Downloading and installing the file Gene.zip was easy done succesfull. The form: I am not able to enter a value in column #Weird if I have entered 8 in the column text. Is that how it is supposed to work? Regards, Koen Is it that you are getting the message regarding that validation? Frank. Frank Cazabon [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/57c734e0-ef02-fc86-57b6-0680755c1...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Yes and still I cannot enter any value in weird Regards Koen Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 17:59 schreef Frank Cazabon > There is validation according to Gene's rule: > > On 10/01/2019 12:10 PM, Koen Piller wrote: > > the row-level validation is: > > asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 > > > Frank, > > Downloading and installing the file Gene.zip was easy done succesfull. > > The form: I am not able to enter a value in column #Weird if I have > entered > > 8 in the column text. Is that how it is supposed to work? > > Regards, > > Koen > > Is it that you are getting the message regarding that validation? > > Frank. > > Frank Cazabon > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACUu1Sv3LzR7wwv2oWg0bKtvFJknJ7zLFUD8Pxv5SEB1zvg=t...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
I didn't get this. What should I do?
;)
E
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:59 AM Charles Hart Enzer, M.D.
wrote:
> I see both mine and others
>
> Shai / שי
> Charles Hart Enzer, MD(Ohio, USA), FAACAP
> Aliyah: Cincinnati to Jerusalem's German Colony May, 2017
>
> Volunteer Associate Professor of Psychiatry
> University of Cincinnati Medical Center
> WebSite: http://EnzerMD.com
>
> If a problem has no solution,
> it may not be a problem,
> but a fact --
> not to be solved,
> but to be coped with over time
>
> -- Shimon Peres, Ninth President of Israel
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 16:29 Dave Crozier
> > Ed,
> > Thanks I'll investigate further!
> >
> > Dave Crozier
> > Software Development Manager
> > Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
> >
> > ﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
> >
> >
> >
> > Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
> > T 01706 222 792
> > E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
> > W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
> > Follow us:
> > Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire,
> > BB4 5HH
> >
> > This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> > person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are
> > confidential and may be protected in law. If you have received this
> e-mail
> > in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
> > it. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.
> > If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately
> by
> > telephone or email.
> >
> > Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise
> > the risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent
> > via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are
> > advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments
> received
> > as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability
> > whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
> >
> > It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have
> > adequate virus protection.
> >
> >
> >
> -
> >
> > Terms & Conditions:
> > Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the
> > property in the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller
> Flexipol
> > Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds
> > payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed to
> be
> > sold by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until such
> > time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall
> hold
> > the goods as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods
> > separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly stored
> > protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but shall
> be
> > entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its
> business.
> > Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the
> seller
> > shall be entitled at any time
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ProFox On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
> > Sent: 10 January 2019 14:24
> > To: ProFox Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
> >
> > On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Dave Crozier
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart
> > from my own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look
> please
> > as it seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all
> my
> > emails as davec at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them
> > under my domain name dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under
> the
> > old alias..
> >
> > Your account is set to receive your own posts, so I assume that it is
> > something in the email client of Office 365 that needs to be changed to
> > make your own posts show up. Some clients see the reply as a dupe (since
> > it’s in your Sent folder) and ignore it.
> >
> >
> > -- Ed Leafe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/caawxvums27hqauughxjah+1yri8zr66dvpusoa3-2o+laea...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
I see both mine and others
Shai / שי
Charles Hart Enzer, MD(Ohio, USA), FAACAP
Aliyah: Cincinnati to Jerusalem's German Colony May, 2017
Volunteer Associate Professor of Psychiatry
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
WebSite: http://EnzerMD.com
If a problem has no solution,
it may not be a problem,
but a fact --
not to be solved,
but to be coped with over time
-- Shimon Peres, Ninth President of Israel
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 16:29 Dave Crozier Ed,
> Thanks I'll investigate further!
>
> Dave Crozier
> Software Development Manager
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
>
> ﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
>
>
>
> Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
> T 01706 222 792
> E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
> W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
> Follow us:
> Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire,
> BB4 5HH
>
> This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are
> confidential and may be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail
> in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
> it. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise
> the risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent
> via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are
> advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received
> as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability
> whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have
> adequate virus protection.
>
>
> -
>
> Terms & Conditions:
> Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the
> property in the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol
> Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds
> payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be
> sold by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until such
> time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold
> the goods as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods
> separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly stored
> protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but shall be
> entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its business.
> Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller
> shall be entitled at any time
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: 10 January 2019 14:24
> To: ProFox Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
>
> On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> >
> > I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart
> from my own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please
> as it seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my
> emails as davec at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them
> under my domain name dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the
> old alias..
>
> Your account is set to receive your own posts, so I assume that it is
> something in the email client of Office 365 that needs to be changed to
> make your own posts show up. Some clients see the reply as a dupe (since
> it’s in your Sent folder) and ignore it.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAFSdja2pucmtkhGx6Zc_Uc1=yUCypUTTTJMe8GeT6Nhgmk8=j...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Hi Dave, I'd read you :-D
El jue., 10 ene. 2019 11:24, Dave Crozier
escribió:
> Ed,
> I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from
> my own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it
> seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails
> as davec at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them under
> my domain name dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the old
> alias..
>
> If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in
> confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave Crozier
> Software Development Manager
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
>
> ﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
>
>
>
> Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
> T 01706 222 792
> E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
> W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
> Follow us:
> Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire,
> BB4 5HH
>
> This communication and the information it contains is intended for the
> person or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are
> confidential and may be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail
> in error you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
> it. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or email.
>
> Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise
> the risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent
> via e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are
> advised to run your own virus check before opening any attachments received
> as Flexipol Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability
> whatsoever once an e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have
> adequate virus protection.
>
>
> -
>
> Terms & Conditions:
> Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the
> property in the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol
> Packaging Ltd. ("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds
> payment in full of the price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be
> sold by the seller to the buyer for which payment is then due. Until such
> time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold
> the goods as the seller's fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods
> separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly stored
> protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but shall be
> entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its business.
> Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller
> shall be entitled at any time
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Fernando D.
> Bozzo
> Sent: 09 January 2019 18:58
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
>
> Test PASSED! - Green light
>
> :D
>
>
> El mié., 9 ene. 2019 a las 19:52, Ed Leafe () escribió:
>
> > Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my
> > domain is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket
> > blocks on any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital
> Ocean).
> >
> > I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (https://www.mailgun.com/).
> > So far it seems to be running well, but if any of you on the receiving
> > end of things notices a problem, please let me know.
> >
> > One other issue is the cost: it’s free if the total # of emails sent
> > is under 100K, but gets expensive above that. Last year the highest
> > number of emails sent in a month was 280 in May, which is about
> > 133,000 total emails, and that would have cost $120 for that month
> > (ouch!). So I’m not sure if I will keep it, but it’s worth a trial at
> least.
> >
> >
> > -- Ed Leafe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cagq_jumwpk7qfrh3y5bbyrxfqtyfdwq0mxr_jjb9chpw4p8...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
There is validation according to Gene's rule: On 10/01/2019 12:10 PM, Koen Piller wrote: the row-level validation is: asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 Frank, Downloading and installing the file Gene.zip was easy done succesfull. The form: I am not able to enter a value in column #Weird if I have entered 8 in the column text. Is that how it is supposed to work? Regards, Koen Is it that you are getting the message regarding that validation? Frank. Frank Cazabon ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ed786b61-a953-490b-da73-b7a9ec201...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Frank, Downloading and installing the file Gene.zip was easy done succesfull. The form: I am not able to enter a value in column #Weird if I have entered 8 in the column text. Is that how it is supposed to work? Regards, Koen Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 16:36 schreef Frank Cazabon : > I was hoping that I would get Gene's response first as it really was a > quick and dirty thing to show him how it could be done, but if others > are interested I guess it won't hurt to have more eyes on it: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mR9CS02c3xr20-Y-sVr2B6cxAvsM8APh/view?usp=sharing > > Let me know if there is a problem downloading the file as I generally > don't share files this way, so may have made a silly mistake when trying > to share it. > > Frank. > > Frank Cazabon > > On 10/01/2019 11:25 AM, Koen Piller wrote: > > Frank > > Would you mind to e-mail me the link also? > > Regards > > Koen > > > > Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 15:06 schreef Frank Cazabon < > frank.caza...@gmail.com> > > > >> Gene, > >> > >> I've knocked up a quick demo which I hope meets your requirements and > >> emailed you the link to the download on google drive. > >> > >> Frank. > >> > >> Frank Cazabon > >> > >> On 09/01/2019 02:52 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > >>> At 05:28 2019-01-08, Frank Cazabon wrote: > Gene, back in April last year you were asking if anyone could write > code to your specification regarding the grid problems you were > having. I don't recall ever seeing your specification, maybe if you > posted it someone might be able to do the code for you. > >>> At that time, I was also having difficulties posting to the > >>> list. I thought I had come up with something, but maybe, it did not > >>> make it and I mistakenly deleted it. Let me specify something simple: > >>> > >>> Consider a cursor or table of: > >>>thetext c(20) > >>>evennr n(3) > >>>weirdnr n(3) > >>> > >>> The validations are: > >>>thetext>"" > >>>evennr%2=0 > >>>weirdnr%3=0 > >>> and the row-level validation is: > >>>asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 > >>> > >>> When a control-level validation error occurs, throw an > >>> appropriate message box and then set focus to the control with the > >>> erroneous value. > >>> > >>> For a row-level validation: > >>> > >>>1) All control-level validations should be done first. Start with > >>> the current control, then do all the others from left to right. The > >>> first that fails gets the message box, and checking stops. > >>> > >>> Then, do the row-level validation. If it fails, throw an > >>> aoppropriate message box and then set focus to the control in the > >>> first column from the left of the values that are checked. (In the > >>> example above, thetext is left of weirdnr, so set focus to thetext.) > >>> > >>> Part 2: > >>> > >>> The columns can now be rearranged in any order. Despite this: > >>> > >>> The coontrol-level validations should still set focus to the > >>> correct control. > >>> > >>> The column-level validations done at the start of the row-level > >>> validation should be done in the order current then left-to-right. > >>> NOTE THAT THIS COULD NOW BE A DIFFERENT ORDER. > >>> > >>> The row-level validation should still set focus to the leftmost > >>> involved control. NOTE THAT THIS MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT CONTROL. > >>> (Example: If weirdnr gets moved to the left of thetext, row-level > >>> validation failing should set focus to weirdnr.) > >>> > >>> > >>> This is basic functionality that I want/need. I have been unable > >>> to get this to work with VFP's Grid despite my efforts. > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>> Sincerely, > >>> > >>> Gene Wirchenko > >>> > >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACUu1Sv4k1pBTuo+xKhEsBxKuOpJy5JMW+OxhxCjiT0=0su...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
I was hoping that I would get Gene's response first as it really was a quick and dirty thing to show him how it could be done, but if others are interested I guess it won't hurt to have more eyes on it: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mR9CS02c3xr20-Y-sVr2B6cxAvsM8APh/view?usp=sharing Let me know if there is a problem downloading the file as I generally don't share files this way, so may have made a silly mistake when trying to share it. Frank. Frank Cazabon On 10/01/2019 11:25 AM, Koen Piller wrote: Frank Would you mind to e-mail me the link also? Regards Koen Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 15:06 schreef Frank Cazabon Gene, I've knocked up a quick demo which I hope meets your requirements and emailed you the link to the download on google drive. Frank. Frank Cazabon On 09/01/2019 02:52 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: At 05:28 2019-01-08, Frank Cazabon wrote: Gene, back in April last year you were asking if anyone could write code to your specification regarding the grid problems you were having. I don't recall ever seeing your specification, maybe if you posted it someone might be able to do the code for you. At that time, I was also having difficulties posting to the list. I thought I had come up with something, but maybe, it did not make it and I mistakenly deleted it. Let me specify something simple: Consider a cursor or table of: thetext c(20) evennr n(3) weirdnr n(3) The validations are: thetext>"" evennr%2=0 weirdnr%3=0 and the row-level validation is: asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 When a control-level validation error occurs, throw an appropriate message box and then set focus to the control with the erroneous value. For a row-level validation: 1) All control-level validations should be done first. Start with the current control, then do all the others from left to right. The first that fails gets the message box, and checking stops. Then, do the row-level validation. If it fails, throw an aoppropriate message box and then set focus to the control in the first column from the left of the values that are checked. (In the example above, thetext is left of weirdnr, so set focus to thetext.) Part 2: The columns can now be rearranged in any order. Despite this: The coontrol-level validations should still set focus to the correct control. The column-level validations done at the start of the row-level validation should be done in the order current then left-to-right. NOTE THAT THIS COULD NOW BE A DIFFERENT ORDER. The row-level validation should still set focus to the leftmost involved control. NOTE THAT THIS MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT CONTROL. (Example: If weirdnr gets moved to the left of thetext, row-level validation failing should set focus to weirdnr.) This is basic functionality that I want/need. I have been unable to get this to work with VFP's Grid despite my efforts. [snip] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1643ada0-3dc2-a65b-461c-3731ffada...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Frank Would you mind to e-mail me the link also? Regards Koen Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 15:06 schreef Frank Cazabon > Gene, > > I've knocked up a quick demo which I hope meets your requirements and > emailed you the link to the download on google drive. > > Frank. > > Frank Cazabon > > On 09/01/2019 02:52 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > > At 05:28 2019-01-08, Frank Cazabon wrote: > >> Gene, back in April last year you were asking if anyone could write > >> code to your specification regarding the grid problems you were > >> having. I don't recall ever seeing your specification, maybe if you > >> posted it someone might be able to do the code for you. > > > > At that time, I was also having difficulties posting to the > > list. I thought I had come up with something, but maybe, it did not > > make it and I mistakenly deleted it. Let me specify something simple: > > > > Consider a cursor or table of: > > thetext c(20) > > evennr n(3) > > weirdnr n(3) > > > > The validations are: > > thetext>"" > > evennr%2=0 > > weirdnr%3=0 > > and the row-level validation is: > > asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 > > > > When a control-level validation error occurs, throw an > > appropriate message box and then set focus to the control with the > > erroneous value. > > > > For a row-level validation: > > > > 1) All control-level validations should be done first. Start with > > the current control, then do all the others from left to right. The > > first that fails gets the message box, and checking stops. > > > > Then, do the row-level validation. If it fails, throw an > > aoppropriate message box and then set focus to the control in the > > first column from the left of the values that are checked. (In the > > example above, thetext is left of weirdnr, so set focus to thetext.) > > > > Part 2: > > > > The columns can now be rearranged in any order. Despite this: > > > > The coontrol-level validations should still set focus to the > > correct control. > > > > The column-level validations done at the start of the row-level > > validation should be done in the order current then left-to-right. > > NOTE THAT THIS COULD NOW BE A DIFFERENT ORDER. > > > > The row-level validation should still set focus to the leftmost > > involved control. NOTE THAT THIS MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT CONTROL. > > (Example: If weirdnr gets moved to the left of thetext, row-level > > validation failing should set focus to weirdnr.) > > > > > > This is basic functionality that I want/need. I have been unable > > to get this to work with VFP's Grid despite my efforts. > > > > [snip] > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Gene Wirchenko > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACUu1SsWgNzGgM=gvqP1gqSCzsKW7BypcaJ1-=kbcvetisc...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Ed,
Thanks I'll investigate further!
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential and may
be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use,
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to
run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Flexipol
Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an
e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate
virus protection.
-
Terms & Conditions:
Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds payment in full of the
price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold by the seller to the
buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as the property in the
goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods as the seller's
fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from those of the buyer
and third parties and properly stored protected and insured and identified as
the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the
ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods
passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time
-Original Message-
From: ProFox On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: 10 January 2019 14:24
To: ProFox Mailing List
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my
> own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it
> seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails
> as davec at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them under my
> domain name dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the old alias..
Your account is set to receive your own posts, so I assume that it is something
in the email client of Office 365 that needs to be changed to make your own
posts show up. Some clients see the reply as a dupe (since it’s in your Sent
folder) and ignore it.
-- Ed Leafe
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cwlp265mb0852024509ea3c034c6452e7fb...@cwlp265mb0852.gbrp265.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: > > I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my > own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it > seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails > as davec at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them under my > domain name dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the old alias.. Your account is set to receive your own posts, so I assume that it is something in the email client of Office 365 that needs to be changed to make your own posts show up. Some clients see the reply as a dupe (since it’s in your Sent folder) and ignore it. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/34157052-34b1-49a0-b25c-5a42ed614...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Work in San Diego???
On Jan 10, 2019, at 1:23 AM, Kurt @ Gmail wrote: > > Ed - thanks again for your input. I actually did reach Barb - and connected > via LinkedIn. Only to find that, sadly, she lost her job this past Nov. - and > is now struggling looking for work as I am! And, she did indeed remember you. Sorry to hear that you’re both looking for work. Good luck! -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/44129c0b-ca34-49ee-a1c4-b5b1de426...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: AW: Custom Scrollbar
Gene, I've knocked up a quick demo which I hope meets your requirements and emailed you the link to the download on google drive. Frank. Frank Cazabon On 09/01/2019 02:52 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: At 05:28 2019-01-08, Frank Cazabon wrote: Gene, back in April last year you were asking if anyone could write code to your specification regarding the grid problems you were having. I don't recall ever seeing your specification, maybe if you posted it someone might be able to do the code for you. At that time, I was also having difficulties posting to the list. I thought I had come up with something, but maybe, it did not make it and I mistakenly deleted it. Let me specify something simple: Consider a cursor or table of: thetext c(20) evennr n(3) weirdnr n(3) The validations are: thetext>"" evennr%2=0 weirdnr%3=0 and the row-level validation is: asc(thetext)%2=weirdnr%2 When a control-level validation error occurs, throw an appropriate message box and then set focus to the control with the erroneous value. For a row-level validation: 1) All control-level validations should be done first. Start with the current control, then do all the others from left to right. The first that fails gets the message box, and checking stops. Then, do the row-level validation. If it fails, throw an aoppropriate message box and then set focus to the control in the first column from the left of the values that are checked. (In the example above, thetext is left of weirdnr, so set focus to thetext.) Part 2: The columns can now be rearranged in any order. Despite this: The coontrol-level validations should still set focus to the correct control. The column-level validations done at the start of the row-level validation should be done in the order current then left-to-right. NOTE THAT THIS COULD NOW BE A DIFFERENT ORDER. The row-level validation should still set focus to the leftmost involved control. NOTE THAT THIS MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT CONTROL. (Example: If weirdnr gets moved to the left of thetext, row-level validation failing should set focus to weirdnr.) This is basic functionality that I want/need. I have been unable to get this to work with VFP's Grid despite my efforts. [snip] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/64f74617-dd0a-e973-b20a-f180906ee...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
+1
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential and may
be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use,
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to
run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Flexipol
Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an
e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate
virus protection.
-
Terms & Conditions:
Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds payment in full of the
price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold by the seller to the
buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as the property in the
goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods as the seller's
fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from those of the buyer
and third parties and properly stored protected and insured and identified as
the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the
ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods
passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time
-Original Message-
From: ProFox On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: 09 January 2019 21:07
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
On 2019-01-09 16:02, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Kurt @ Gmail wrote:
>>
>> Ed - I really do NOT think you should use this service - since its
>> Pricey - and there's NO Reason why you should pay for the service
>> when these forums don't even Net you ANY $$$!
>
> Most months were below the level that the service would be free -
> around 210 messages / month. And it would be nice to not have to hunt
> down why various people aren’t getting their messages, which usually
> ends up being “my ISP is blocking you”.
>
>> Also - you do this same similar forum for Python - don't you? Which,
>> if so, increases total # of emails, and thus the monthly cost. Or,
>> maybe the cost is Per forum type - not grouped together…
>
> I also host the ProLinux and ProPython lists, which were set up to not
> clog up ProFox with discussions of moving to Linux or programming in
> Python. While they were busy at first, in 2018 they had 17 and 15
> messages for the *entire year*, of which 13 were the monthly/yearly
> statistics postings. So those don’t really make much of an impact.
Well, if ever needed, do a GoFundMe (or better site) campaign and we'll all
chip in. I know I'd have no problem throwing a few bucks at this as a "thank
you" for such a great resource.
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cwlp265mb08527a27871ef486ffa21f7efb...@cwlp265mb0852.gbrp265.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Thanks John,
Can see your reply but not my original post and I guess not this reply either.
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
-Original Message-
From: ProFox On Behalf Of John Weller
Sent: 10 January 2019 10:33
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Hi Dave,
Message received. I am using Office 365 as a personal account and am seeing my
posts.
John
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 10 January 2019 10:24
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Ed,
I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my
own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it seems
to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails as davec
at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them under my domain name
dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the old alias..
If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in
confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly.
Thanks
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential and may
be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use,
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to
run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Flexipol
Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an
e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate
virus protection.
-
Terms & Conditions:
Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds payment in full of the
price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold by the seller to the
buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as the property in the
goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods as the seller's
fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from those of the buyer
and third parties and properly stored protected and insured and identified as
the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the
ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods
passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time -Original
Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo
Sent: 09 January 2019 18:58
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Test PASSED! - Green light
:D
El mié., 9 ene. 2019 a las 19:52, Ed Leafe () escribió:
> Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my
> domain is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket
> blocks on any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital Ocean).
>
> I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (https://www.mailgun.com/).
> So far it seems to be running well, but if any of you on the receiving
> end of things notices a problem, please let me know.
>
> One other issue is the cost: it’s free if the total # of emails sent
> is under 100K, but gets expensive above that. Last year the highest
> number of emails sent in a month was 280 in May, which is about
> 133,000 total emails, and that would have cost $120 for that month
> (ouch!). So I’m not sure if I will keep it, but it’s worth a trial at least.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Hi Dave,
Message received. I am using Office 365 as a personal account and am seeing my
posts.
John
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 10 January 2019 10:24
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Ed,
I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my
own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it seems
to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails as davec
at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them under my domain name
dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the old alias..
If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in
confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly.
Thanks
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential and may
be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use,
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to
run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Flexipol
Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an
e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate
virus protection.
-
Terms & Conditions:
Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds payment in full of the
price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold by the seller to the
buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as the property in the
goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods as the seller's
fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from those of the buyer
and third parties and properly stored protected and insured and identified as
the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the
ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods
passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time -Original
Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo
Sent: 09 January 2019 18:58
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Test PASSED! - Green light
:D
El mié., 9 ene. 2019 a las 19:52, Ed Leafe () escribió:
> Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my
> domain is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket
> blocks on any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital Ocean).
>
> I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (https://www.mailgun.com/).
> So far it seems to be running well, but if any of you on the receiving
> end of things notices a problem, please let me know.
>
> One other issue is the cost: it’s free if the total # of emails sent
> is under 100K, but gets expensive above that. Last year the highest
> number of emails sent in a month was 280 in May, which is about
> 133,000 total emails, and that would have cost $120 for that month
> (ouch!). So I’m not sure if I will keep it, but it’s worth a trial at least.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003101d4a8cf$e07fde40$a17f9ac0$@johnweller.co.uk
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are
RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Ed,
I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my
own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it seems
to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails as davec
at Flexipol.co.uk when we had exchange but now send them under my domain name
dcrozier at flesipol.co.uk but can receive under the old alias..
If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in
confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly.
Thanks
Dave Crozier
Software Development Manager
Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
﴾⚆ᨎ⚆﴿
Flexipol® Packaging Ltd
T 01706 222 792
E dcroz...@flexipol.co.uk
W https://www.flexipol.co.uk/
Follow us:
Unit 14 Bentwood Road, Carrs Industrial Estate, Haslingden, Lancashire, BB4 5HH
This communication and the information it contains is intended for the person
or organisation to whom it is addressed. Its contents are confidential and may
be protected in law. If you have received this e-mail in error you must not
copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Unauthorised use,
copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email.
Flexipol Packaging Ltd. has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise the
risk of virus transmission through email and therefore any files sent via
e-mail will have been checked for known viruses. However, you are advised to
run your own virus check before opening any attachments received as Flexipol
Packaging Ltd will not in any event accept any liability whatsoever once an
e-mail and/or any attachment is received.
It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they have adequate
virus protection.
-
Terms & Conditions:
Notwithstanding delivery and the passing of risk in the goods, the property in
the goods shall not pass to the buyer until the seller Flexipol Packaging Ltd.
("The Company") has received in cash or cleared funds payment in full of the
price of the goods and all other goods agreed to be sold by the seller to the
buyer for which payment is then due. Until such time as the property in the
goods passes to the buyer, the buyer shall hold the goods as the seller's
fiduciary agent and bailee and keep the goods separate from those of the buyer
and third parties and properly stored protected and insured and identified as
the seller's property but shall be entitled to resell or use the goods in the
ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods
passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo
Sent: 09 January 2019 18:58
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay
Test PASSED! - Green light
:D
El mié., 9 ene. 2019 a las 19:52, Ed Leafe () escribió:
> Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my
> domain is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket
> blocks on any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital Ocean).
>
> I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (https://www.mailgun.com/).
> So far it seems to be running well, but if any of you on the receiving
> end of things notices a problem, please let me know.
>
> One other issue is the cost: it’s free if the total # of emails sent
> is under 100K, but gets expensive above that. Last year the highest
> number of emails sent in a month was 280 in May, which is about
> 133,000 total emails, and that would have cost $120 for that month
> (ouch!). So I’m not sure if I will keep it, but it’s worth a trial at least.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cwlp265mb08526e54a64b64840ed6854efb...@cwlp265mb0852.gbrp265.prod.outlook.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
