Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
/Side by Side/ The important thing to remember is that VFPA *is* VFP9. It's not a different product at all. So everything is going to work pretty much the exact same except those places where he explicitly inserted code fixes. 99.9% is the same code. Eric On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:43 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > On 11/22/2019 1:18 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > > At 15:07 2019-11-21, "MB Software Solutions, LLC" > > >> On 11/21/2019 4:34 PM, Eric Selje wrote: > > > > > >> > The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but > >> they're a > different company now. Their take is basically "If you > >> want to modify the > copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." > > > >> Yeah, the ballmer days (thankfully) are long gone. That guy sucked. > > > > What did he suck? Donkey balls? > > https://donkeyballstore.com/ > > > > > > I'd be all for sending him a huge pile of dung: https://poopsenders.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAwxvU=Or3cN6Q32KF-mhwU1VUZiK3_3aSTX3Y=gkjgxwqz...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
On 11/22/2019 1:18 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: At 15:07 2019-11-21, "MB Software Solutions, LLC" On 11/21/2019 4:34 PM, Eric Selje wrote: > The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but they're a > different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify the > copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." Yeah, the ballmer days (thankfully) are long gone. That guy sucked. What did he suck? Donkey balls? https://donkeyballstore.com/ I'd be all for sending him a huge pile of dung: https://poopsenders.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/63c48211-330d-3f9c-faac-322d0e0ea...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
At 15:07 2019-11-21, "MB Software Solutions, LLC" On 11/21/2019 4:34 PM, Eric Selje wrote: > The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but they're a > different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify the > copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." Yeah, the ballmer days (thankfully) are long gone. That guy sucked. What did he suck? Donkey balls? https://donkeyballstore.com/ Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
Dang it! Paul H. Tarver -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 7:24 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command) Hi Paul, You missed Eric's SWFox presentation. You can have VFP 9 SP 2, VFP Advanced, and VFP Advanced 64bit running on the same machine. Eric didn't say you needed to change anything. Here did have both VFP 9 and Advanced running at the same time. Tracy On November 21, 2019 5:09:27 PM EST, "Paul H. Tarver" wrote: >This is going to seem like a stupid question I'm sure but is there a >way to >run VFPA (either 32 or 64 bit) in parallel with VFP9? > >I'd like to test, but I don't want to mess up my existing development >environment. Some of the readme files seem to indicate the answer is >no. > >Paul H. Tarver > > >-Original Message- >From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of >Eric >Selje >Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 3:35 PM >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >Subject: Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE >command) > >The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but >they're a >different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify >the >copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." > >VERSION() either returns 10, or not. Almost all of the changes he >implemented can be turned off with settings for maximum backwards >compatibility. > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:07 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < >mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > >> On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: >> > VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, >with >> some >> > binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a >64-bit >> > version. >> > >> > Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is >that >> > there's no reason every VFP developer should not. >> > >> > Eric >> >> >> I was surprised that M$ didn't send out a "cease and desist" or some >> such action for it. Morally and ethically, there's nothing wrong >with >> it from what I can tell, but you recall the HUGE STINK they put up >when >> Whil Hentzen was going to show VFP running on WINE. I can't see the >> harm in that either, for that matter. If that increases M$'s VFP >sales, >> GREAT! (Yes, that's laughable to say...cue the quote by BG about >every >> time VFP was sold, they lost $20,000 or something on SQL Server >sales.) >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/008101d5a15a$80f33a10$82d9ae30$@tpcqpc.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
Actually, I have a virtual machine I could do that on, I was just thinking it would be easier to do side-by-side comparisons. One thing is certain, doing the first install on a virtual machine is definitely probably the way to start as the instructions are a bit vague. :) Paul H. Tarver -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 5:05 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command) On 11/21/2019 5:09 PM, Paul H. Tarver wrote: > This is going to seem like a stupid question I'm sure but is there a way to > run VFPA (either 32 or 64 bit) in parallel with VFP9? > > I'd like to test, but I don't want to mess up my existing development > environment. Some of the readme files seem to indicate the answer is no. > > Paul H. Tarver Time for that 2nd laptop (Or Virtual Machine), Paul. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/008201d5a15a$810402f0$830c08d0$@tpcqpc.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
Yep, they don't mess with each other at all unless you have VFPA take over your file extensions for .app files, etc. On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:24 PM Tracy Pearson wrote: > Hi Paul, > > You missed Eric's SWFox presentation. > You can have VFP 9 SP 2, VFP Advanced, and VFP Advanced 64bit running on > the same machine. Eric didn't say you needed to change anything. Here did > have both VFP 9 and Advanced running at the same time. > > Tracy > > > On November 21, 2019 5:09:27 PM EST, "Paul H. Tarver" > wrote: > >This is going to seem like a stupid question I'm sure but is there a > >way to > >run VFPA (either 32 or 64 bit) in parallel with VFP9? > > > >I'd like to test, but I don't want to mess up my existing development > >environment. Some of the readme files seem to indicate the answer is > >no. > > > >Paul H. Tarver > > > > > >-Original Message- > >From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of > >Eric > >Selje > >Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 3:35 PM > >To: profoxt...@leafe.com > >Subject: Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE > >command) > > > >The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but > >they're a > >different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify > >the > >copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." > > > >VERSION() either returns 10, or not. Almost all of the changes he > >implemented can be turned off with settings for maximum backwards > >compatibility. > > > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:07 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < > >mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > > > >> On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: > >> > VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, > >with > >> some > >> > binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a > >64-bit > >> > version. > >> > > >> > Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is > >that > >> > there's no reason every VFP developer should not. > >> > > >> > Eric > >> > >> > >> I was surprised that M$ didn't send out a "cease and desist" or some > >> such action for it. Morally and ethically, there's nothing wrong > >with > >> it from what I can tell, but you recall the HUGE STINK they put up > >when > >> Whil Hentzen was going to show VFP running on WINE. I can't see the > >> harm in that either, for that matter. If that increases M$'s VFP > >sales, > >> GREAT! (Yes, that's laughable to say...cue the quote by BG about > >every > >> time VFP was sold, they lost $20,000 or something on SQL Server > >sales.) > >> > >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAwxvU=-fuc+xc9xw1t+tbebhpk9axhark88vt2zqeq_t7c...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
Hi Paul, You missed Eric's SWFox presentation. You can have VFP 9 SP 2, VFP Advanced, and VFP Advanced 64bit running on the same machine. Eric didn't say you needed to change anything. Here did have both VFP 9 and Advanced running at the same time. Tracy On November 21, 2019 5:09:27 PM EST, "Paul H. Tarver" wrote: >This is going to seem like a stupid question I'm sure but is there a >way to >run VFPA (either 32 or 64 bit) in parallel with VFP9? > >I'd like to test, but I don't want to mess up my existing development >environment. Some of the readme files seem to indicate the answer is >no. > >Paul H. Tarver > > >-Original Message- >From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of >Eric >Selje >Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 3:35 PM >To: profoxt...@leafe.com >Subject: Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE >command) > >The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but >they're a >different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify >the >copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." > >VERSION() either returns 10, or not. Almost all of the changes he >implemented can be turned off with settings for maximum backwards >compatibility. > >On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:07 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < >mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > >> On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: >> > VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, >with >> some >> > binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a >64-bit >> > version. >> > >> > Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is >that >> > there's no reason every VFP developer should not. >> > >> > Eric >> >> >> I was surprised that M$ didn't send out a "cease and desist" or some >> such action for it. Morally and ethically, there's nothing wrong >with >> it from what I can tell, but you recall the HUGE STINK they put up >when >> Whil Hentzen was going to show VFP running on WINE. I can't see the >> harm in that either, for that matter. If that increases M$'s VFP >sales, >> GREAT! (Yes, that's laughable to say...cue the quote by BG about >every >> time VFP was sold, they lost $20,000 or something on SQL Server >sales.) >> >> [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/520036ab-a1c5-4a42-839a-2a43a3ac2...@powerchurch.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
On 11/21/2019 4:34 PM, Eric Selje wrote: The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but they're a different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify the copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." Yeah, the ballmer days (thankfully) are long gone. That guy sucked. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/ae80d381-ab54-4489-f163-b04f90b13...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
On 11/21/2019 5:09 PM, Paul H. Tarver wrote: This is going to seem like a stupid question I'm sure but is there a way to run VFPA (either 32 or 64 bit) in parallel with VFP9? I'd like to test, but I don't want to mess up my existing development environment. Some of the readme files seem to indicate the answer is no. Paul H. Tarver Time for that 2nd laptop (Or Virtual Machine), Paul. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/6b191dae-cfcb-cd7e-861b-d09c32152...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
This is going to seem like a stupid question I'm sure but is there a way to run VFPA (either 32 or 64 bit) in parallel with VFP9? I'd like to test, but I don't want to mess up my existing development environment. Some of the readme files seem to indicate the answer is no. Paul H. Tarver -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Eric Selje Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 3:35 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command) The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but they're a different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify the copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." VERSION() either returns 10, or not. Almost all of the changes he implemented can be turned off with settings for maximum backwards compatibility. On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:07 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: > > VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, with > some > > binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a 64-bit > > version. > > > > Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is that > > there's no reason every VFP developer should not. > > > > Eric > > > I was surprised that M$ didn't send out a "cease and desist" or some > such action for it. Morally and ethically, there's nothing wrong with > it from what I can tell, but you recall the HUGE STINK they put up when > Whil Hentzen was going to show VFP running on WINE. I can't see the > harm in that either, for that matter. If that increases M$'s VFP sales, > GREAT! (Yes, that's laughable to say...cue the quote by BG about every > time VFP was sold, they lost $20,000 or something on SQL Server sales.) > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/012201d5a0b8$57a49c50$06edd4f0$@tpcqpc.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
The Microsoft of 20 years ago probably would have complained, but they're a different company now. Their take is basically "If you want to modify the copy of VFP that you paid for, go for it." VERSION() either returns 10, or not. Almost all of the changes he implemented can be turned off with settings for maximum backwards compatibility. On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:07 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: > > VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, with > some > > binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a 64-bit > > version. > > > > Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is that > > there's no reason every VFP developer should not. > > > > Eric > > > I was surprised that M$ didn't send out a "cease and desist" or some > such action for it. Morally and ethically, there's nothing wrong with > it from what I can tell, but you recall the HUGE STINK they put up when > Whil Hentzen was going to show VFP running on WINE. I can't see the > harm in that either, for that matter. If that increases M$'s VFP sales, > GREAT! (Yes, that's laughable to say...cue the quote by BG about every > time VFP was sold, they lost $20,000 or something on SQL Server sales.) > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAwxvUk-K=wl9oapgvt8foz5svtwawye79tzy+p-125+d47...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, with some binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a 64-bit version. Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is that there's no reason every VFP developer should not. Eric I was surprised that M$ didn't send out a "cease and desist" or some such action for it. Morally and ethically, there's nothing wrong with it from what I can tell, but you recall the HUGE STINK they put up when Whil Hentzen was going to show VFP running on WINE. I can't see the harm in that either, for that matter. If that increases M$'s VFP sales, GREAT! (Yes, that's laughable to say...cue the quote by BG about every time VFP was sold, they lost $20,000 or something on SQL Server sales.) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/bf276e54-5d5d-7b91-fa7d-add23a563...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
On 11/21/2019 2:54 PM, Eric Selje wrote: VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, with some binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a 64-bit version. Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is that there's no reason every VFP developer should not. Eric Cool. So it's basically a new set of runtimes and you just redistribute those with your apps? What's the VERSION() value returned? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/b05949d0-976c-3b0d-83df-5d11ae928...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
VFP 10 (or VFP Advanced) is a copy of your licensed copy of VFP9, with some binary patches to fix bugs and add features. There's *also* a 64-bit version. Yes, I use it every day, along with 1000's of others. My opinion is that there's no reason every VFP developer should not. Eric On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:43 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > On 11/21/2019 2:42 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > > Is Anybody using "VFP Advanced" here? IIRC, that's the Chinese VFP 10 > > version for 64-bit...correct? > > > > (Anybody other than Eric, I mean.) > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAAwxvUkAV1JvC-CjZoCrA7CBED3a=fn7wy4lga7v0nuzyym...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: VFP Advanced (was Fwd: RE: Fatal error issuing CALCULATE command)
On 11/21/2019 2:42 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Is Anybody using "VFP Advanced" here? IIRC, that's the Chinese VFP 10 version for 64-bit...correct? (Anybody other than Eric, I mean.) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/1639363f-806f-ce60-c166-4b41fa738...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
