Re: git migration complete
Few minor things I noticed: 1) the github.com/Apache/qpid-proton mirror has been deleted, but the git.apache.org mirror remains? Intentional? The GitHub mirror is still useful for tracking forks... 2) there doesn't appear to be any linkage between JIRAs and commits anymore? Does someone need to enable that to point at git? 3) no entry for the qpid-proton git repository on reviews.apache.org when you create a review request? Cheers Dom
Re: git migration complete
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 20:53 +, Dominic Evans wrote: Few minor things I noticed: 1) the github.com/Apache/qpid-proton mirror has been deleted, but the git.apache.org mirror remains? Intentional? The GitHub mirror is still useful for tracking forks... Ouch, what will happen to existing forks? 2) there doesn't appear to be any linkage between JIRAs and commits anymore? Does someone need to enable that to point at git? I think that the existing information will just have gone as it was a simple url to the svn repo put in the jira comments by a process listening to the checkin stream. To migrate it would be a significant effort for someone. I think this is a substantial loss of project functionality - I would have voted against the migration if this loss had been pointed out.
Re: git migration complete
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 16:00 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 20:53 +, Dominic Evans wrote: Few minor things I noticed: 1) the github.com/Apache/qpid-proton mirror has been deleted, but the git.apache.org mirror remains? Intentional? The GitHub mirror is still useful for tracking forks... Ouch, what will happen to existing forks? 2) there doesn't appear to be any linkage between JIRAs and commits anymore? Does someone need to enable that to point at git? I think that the existing information will just have gone as it was a simple url to the svn repo put in the jira comments by a process listening to the checkin stream. To migrate it would be a significant effort for someone. I think this is a substantial loss of project functionality - I would have voted against the migration if this loss had been pointed out. Justin pointed out that the existing links still point to the old svn repo (readonly now) so this isn't that bad, however we should get something similar set up for git ASAP. Andrew
Re: git migration complete
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 16:00 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 20:53 +, Dominic Evans wrote: Few minor things I noticed: 1) the github.com/Apache/qpid-proton mirror has been deleted, but the git.apache.org mirror remains? Intentional? The GitHub mirror is still useful for tracking forks... Ouch, what will happen to existing forks? 2) there doesn't appear to be any linkage between JIRAs and commits anymore? Does someone need to enable that to point at git? I think that the existing information will just have gone as it was a simple url to the svn repo put in the jira comments by a process listening to the checkin stream. To migrate it would be a significant effort for someone. I think this is a substantial loss of project functionality - I would have voted against the migration if this loss had been pointed out. Justin pointed out that the existing links still point to the old svn repo (readonly now) so this isn't that bad, however we should get something similar set up for git ASAP. The git to JIRA integration does exist and was supposed to have been set up with the initial migration. I believe it was simply overlooked. I posted a comment to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8580, and I believe the integration has been set up now, but I haven't tested it personally. The comment trail on the above mentioned JIRA also indicates that the github mirror will sync within 24 hours, so lets hope it will reappear. As for the reviews issue, I'm not sure what the procedure is to get that set up correctly. Does anyone else know? --Rafael
