[Proto-Scripty] Re: Using Ajax.Updater posts the contain form
Hi,
The code you included in your message isn't posting any forms; it must
be something else on the page.
Can you produce a minimalist, complete, stand-alone example of the
behavior? (There's a template here[1] if you like.) See Step 3 in
this troubleshooting tip[2] on the FAQ for details and rationale.
[1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/self-contained-test-page
[2] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/faq#xyzprob
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Aug 13, 9:18 am, dpGoose cpzare...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Axaj.Updater to retrieve a message from the server and it
does do this but it also posts the form the Updater script and
associated controls are contained in. I have followed the examples on
the prototype site with modifications for my web server. Why is this
happening? Here is the relevant code. This response is just a text
message.
script type=text/javascript
function loadit()
{
new Ajax.Updater( 'structureTree', 'Render?s=OrgConfigAjax',
{
method: 'get',
parameters:
{
cmd: 'test'
}
});
}
/script
button onclick=loadit();Click me/button
div id=structureTreeLoading...
/div
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Using Ajax.Updater posts the contain form
Can you explain it a bit better?
I dont quite understand what is going on
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: dpGoose cpzare...@googlemail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:18 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Using Ajax.Updater posts the contain form
Hi,
I am using Axaj.Updater to retrieve a message from the server and it
does do this but it also posts the form the Updater script and
associated controls are contained in. I have followed the examples on
the prototype site with modifications for my web server. Why is this
happening? Here is the relevant code. This response is just a text
message.
script type=text/javascript
function loadit()
{
new Ajax.Updater( 'structureTree', 'Render?s=OrgConfigAjax',
{
method: 'get',
parameters:
{
cmd: 'test'
}
});
}
/script
button onclick=loadit();Click me/button
div id=structureTreeLoading...
/div
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Responders
2009/8/12 Alex McAuley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com: Thanks TJ, I'll look into it and see if i can hack something together Alex Mcauley http://www.thevacancymarket.com - Original Message - From: T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:54 AM Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Responders Hi Alex, I don't think there's any official way. A quick look at the 1.6.0.3 release (line #1439) suggests that your responder can access the target container via the request parameter passed to your responder, specifically request.container.success (the container that will be updated on success) and request.container.failure (the one that will be updated on failure). As this is undocumented (AFAIK), it may change from release to release... HTH, -- T.J. Crowder tj / crowder software / com Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available On Aug 12, 9:37 am, Jeztah webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote: Morning Guys / Gals... I am sure this has been covered before but i'll post it anyway as i cant find it in a search!... I am speeding up a website at the moment by using Ajax to do some dirty work in heavy loading pages (pagination and so on)... I need to put a loading spinner or text in place of an element while the ajax is doing its thing I could code each function to do this but i am sure there is an easier way. My first thought is to use Ajax.Responders to do something, but.. Is there a way i can get the Element that is going to be updated by the Ajax.Updater via Ajax.Responders - then i can just code something Generic into the JS and dont have to worry about updating stuff all the time... Thanks in advance Alex My solution was to use responders. As part of the response object, I add a spinner property and a form property. In the responder, if these were present, then I processed them accordingly (onCreate : spinner on , form elements disabled and onComplete/onException/onError the settings are reversed). It works for me, but does require 2 optional additional properties to the AJAX request. -- - Richard Quadling Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants! EE : http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_248814.html Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498r=213474731 ZOPA : http://uk.zopa.com/member/RQuadling --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Using Ajax.Updater posts the contain form
dpGoose wrote:
Hi,
I am using Axaj.Updater to retrieve a message from the server and it
does do this but it also posts the form the Updater script and
associated controls are contained in. I have followed the examples on
the prototype site with modifications for my web server. Why is this
happening? Here is the relevant code. This response is just a text
message.
script type=text/javascript
function loadit()
{
new Ajax.Updater( 'structureTree', 'Render?s=OrgConfigAjax',
{
method: 'get',
parameters:
{
cmd: 'test'
}
});
}
/script
button onclick=loadit();Click me/button
div id=structureTreeLoading...
/div
Hi,
you might want to try putting the attribute setting
type=button
in your button-tag.
I assume the snippet you posted is contained in a form, right?
Button-tags are type=submit by default, so clicking the button will
trigger both 'click' and 'submit' events.
Does this help?
Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Using Ajax.Updater posts the contain form
I assume the snippet you posted is contained in a form, right?
Button-tags are type=submit by default...
Gah! I read right past that. Nice catch.
-- T.J.
On Aug 13, 1:21 pm, Daniel Rubin dru...@dimedis.de wrote:
dpGoose wrote:
Hi,
I am using Axaj.Updater to retrieve a message from the server and it
does do this but it also posts the form the Updater script and
associated controls are contained in. I have followed the examples on
the prototype site with modifications for my web server. Why is this
happening? Here is the relevant code. This response is just a text
message.
script type=text/javascript
function loadit()
{
new Ajax.Updater( 'structureTree', 'Render?s=OrgConfigAjax',
{
method: 'get',
parameters:
{
cmd: 'test'
}
});
}
/script
button onclick=loadit();Click me/button
div id=structureTreeLoading...
/div
Hi,
you might want to try putting the attribute setting
type=button
in your button-tag.
I assume the snippet you posted is contained in a form, right?
Button-tags are type=submit by default, so clicking the button will
trigger both 'click' and 'submit' events.
Does this help?
Daniel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Observing a checkbox
What is the correct Cross browser way to observe a checkbox being
checked or not
I am using
$('hidenonlive').observe('change',function() {
if($('hidenonlive').checked!==true) {
alert('Showing');
} else {
$$('.dead-vacancy').invoke('hide');
}
});
But it doesnt seem to want to work in IE8 and it doesnt throw an
error SHoudl i just use click instead?
Thanks in advance
ALex
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Observing a checkbox
checked === true is wrong you should check for ('checked' ==
$(input).checked || true == $(input).checked)
ps: untested
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jeztahwebmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote:
What is the correct Cross browser way to observe a checkbox being
checked or not
I am using
$('hidenonlive').observe('change',function() {
if($('hidenonlive').checked!==true) {
alert('Showing');
} else {
$$('.dead-vacancy').invoke('hide');
}
});
But it doesnt seem to want to work in IE8 and it doesnt throw an
error SHoudl i just use click instead?
Thanks in advance
ALex
--
Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no
matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and
your own common sense.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Casting a json object into an instance of a class
You could just have the server return code that instantiates the
object to begin with. You aren't limited to JSON its just convienent
because the structure is simple and there are plenty of processors
that understand it. But you can evaluate any JS code just as is.
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Aug 12, 8:36 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
At least, I now know what is the state of the art way of getting a
class instance through Ajax ;o)
Well, I don't know if it's state of the art, but provided you're in
control of both ends (so, for instance, the raw data object doesn't
get fields that end up overwriting your methods), it seems fine.
Thanks again!
Happy to help,
-- T.J.
On Aug 12, 12:06 pm, Eric lefauv...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply T.J.!
I did used Class instead of class. This was a typo when I posted :o)
You're right, it should have work the way I did it... and it actually
did work this way...
...except that due to a mistake in my events handling, my new thing
value was overridden by some obsolete part of code just after being
converted into a class instance :o(
And since it was overridden by the raw JSON object value, I stupidly
assumed that the casting didn't work.
At least, I now know what is the state of the art way of getting a
class instance through Ajax ;o)
Thanks again!
Eric
On Aug 12, 10:49 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
That should work. I notice that you have class.Create rather than
Class.create; I assume that's just an error in the note and that the
actual code uses Class.create? Because if not, that's your problem.
if(myInstance.isB())...
= isB is undefined
That indicates there's a different problem. isB should be defined
regardless, you defined it in your class definition. If the
Object.extend thing weren't working, it should *return* undefined, but
not *be* undefined.
FWIW, this works:
* * * * (also athttp://pastie.org/581050)
// Defining
var Thing = Class.create({
initialize: function(src)
{
if (src) {
Object.extend(this, src);
}
},
isB: function()
{
return this.b;
}
});
// Using:
var t;
t = new Thing({b: true});
alert(t.isB() ? + t.isB());
* * * *
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[Proto-Scripty] Re: image flickering with Effect.Morph
I am trying to code an OS X-style menu bar with prototype
Are you talking about the dock?
http://positionabsolute.net/blog/2007/08/prototype-fisheye.php
On Jul 13, 4:05 pm, Mario Colombo mario.colo...@yetnet.ch wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am trying to code an OS X-style menu bar with prototype and
scriptaculous 1.8.2. I have two problems which I hope to solve with
your feedback. I myself am stuck after failing with all the ideas I
had.
Please find the example
here:http://aldebaran.mine.nu/menu/menu.htmlhttp://aldebaran.mine.nu/menu/menu.jshttp://aldebaran.mine.nu/menu/menu.css
1st problem: image flickering: changing mouseover over the different
divs produces a flash or flickering. Reading this group and other
sources suggest that it is a problem with different Effects active at
the same time. I tried to solve this over Effect.Queues and cancel the
whole queue with my scope: 'menu' but unfortunately cancelling queues
results in no effects at all:
---[code]--
// menuelement is the current menu div from $$('.level_one').each
(function(menuelement) {
elDimensions = menuelement.getDimensions(); // to set style manually
to where the effect was cancelled
var queue = Effect.Queues.get('menu'); // cancelling the whole scope:
'menu' queue
queue.each(function(effect) { effect.cancel(); });
menuelement.setStyle('height:'+ elDimensions.height + 'px; ' +
'width:' + elDimensions.width + 'px;') // set dimensions to where
effect stops
var myEffect = new Effect.Morph(menuelement, {style: {width:'100px',
height:'100px'}, queue: {position: 'end', scope: 'menu'}}); //new
effect takes place
---[/code]--
I also tried to save all effects to the same variable myEffect,
trying to have them overwrite themselves, which brought a partial
improvement.
2nd problem: On 'mouseout' I would like the menu to return to its
original state 'width:100px; height:100px;' I tried the following
code:
---[code]--
Event.observe($('menu'), 'mouseout', function(event) { //
'menu' is the id of the containing div
$$('.level_one').each(function(menuelement) {
var myEffect = new Effect.Morph(menuelement, {style:
{width:'100px', height:'100px'}});
});});
---[/code]--
This resulted in erratic behaviour.
Help would be greatly appreciated. Help for better OO programming is
always welcome. Thank you in advance.
Mario
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
