[Proto-Scripty] Re: Updating Google's AJAX API repository to Prototype 1.7RC2

2010-09-16 Thread T.J. Crowder
Hi,

I don't think the core team generally push betas to Google (and that's
what an RC is, a beta -- a late-stage beta to be sure, but a beta).
Only GAs go there as far as I know.

No idea how far 1.7 is from being released. The Lighthouse project[1]
is showing 28% complete, with 47 of 170 tickets resolved, but I expect
some (many?) of those remaining tickets will be moved to a 1.7.1
milestone or some such.

[1] https://prototype.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8886/home
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com

On Sep 16, 11:21 am, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi.

 I'm trying to demonstrate a problem I'm having. Embedding my own
 Prototype seems daft. I'd like to be able to use the Google's AJAX API
 repository, but they don't have 1.7RC2 there.

 Who is responsible for getting these up to date?
 Will an RC get to the repository?

 On a side note, does anyone have any idea how far 1.7 is away from
 being ready for release?

 As always, my sincere thanks to all of you for your generosity in
 providing such a world class library.

 (Hmmm, laying it on a bit thick, maybe?! But meant!)

 Regards,

 Richard.

 --
 Richard Quadling
 Twitter : EE : Zend
 @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Chrome 5 refused to get unsafe header xjson

2010-09-16 Thread Richard Quadling
On 16 September 2010 11:21, nigeke...@googlemail.com
nigeke...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Content-Type: application/json;

That's the important bit.

So, now your JSON data will be in ...

transport.responseJSON

You don't need to evalJS() as JSON is JS.



-- 
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Nested Ajax.Updater

2010-09-16 Thread Ed Fullman
Javascript can be executed on the server in Ajax. The un-nested version I
documented in my last email runs fine.

If I run the Ajax.updater without nesting two calls, the first call executes
fine on the server loading Javascript and executing. When the response comes
back however, it is loaded with iframes and Javascript so if I have a
firewall up the response hits the firewall and dies.


On 9/16/10 3:51 AM, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:

 
 
 On Sep 15, 1:54 am, Ed Fullman edfull...@gmail.com wrote:
 The file fbsidebar.html is a standard Facebook plugin as follows.
 I need fbsidebar.html to run on the server, and return only the rendered
 code. In this (current) configuration, the Ajax.updater in Index.html will
 return a bunch of iframes and javascript that make subsequent calls in the
 browser to Facebook domains encountering corporate firewalls.
 
 AFAICS fbsidebar.html is HTML with Javascript embedded.
 
 I don't think you can run Javascript on the server without a SSJS
 system on the server: I've never heard of running it server-side in an
 HTML page like a PHP program.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



[Proto-Scripty] Just open a web page in a lightbox?

2010-09-16 Thread JWWright
I searched: Your search - open web page lightbox - did not match any
documents.

I cannot find any info on how to use this to simply open a web page,
within a lightbox using this script.

I have a link, when it is clicked, I want a web page with a table of
links top open, lightbox style.

Thats all.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



[Proto-Scripty] Re: Chrome 5 refused to get unsafe header xjson

2010-09-16 Thread nigeke...@googlemail.com
Still not working in Chrome. Still getting the same error.

I tried with transport.responseJSON and transport.headerJSON.

The only positive difference is that the rails webrick server now
shows the request going to the correct controller and it executes the
query. It was not doing this before.

This is very annoying,

I appreciate your help Richard.



On Sep 16, 1:46 pm, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 16 September 2010 11:21, nigeke...@googlemail.com

 nigeke...@googlemail.com wrote:
  Content-Type: application/json;

 That's the important bit.

 So, now your JSON data will be in ...

 transport.responseJSON

 You don't need to evalJS() as JSON is JS.

 --
 Richard Quadling
 Twitter : EE : Zend
 @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Nested Ajax.Updater

2010-09-16 Thread Phil Petree
I've been thinking about this... kinda nagging at me in the back of my
mind...

Why not use AJAX to make a SOAP call?  The SOAP call would make the call to
the fbapi completely transparent.

One article here:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsajax/

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:51 AM, ColinFine colin.f...@pace.com wrote:



 On Sep 15, 1:54 am, Ed Fullman edfull...@gmail.com wrote:
  The file fbsidebar.html is a standard Facebook plugin as follows.
  I need fbsidebar.html to run on the server, and return only the rendered
  code. In this (current) configuration, the Ajax.updater in Index.html
 will
  return a bunch of iframes and javascript that make subsequent calls in
 the
  browser to Facebook domains encountering corporate firewalls.

 AFAICS fbsidebar.html is HTML with Javascript embedded.

 I don't think you can run Javascript on the server without a SSJS
 system on the server: I've never heard of running it server-side in an
 HTML page like a PHP program.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comprototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



[Proto-Scripty] chain findall each

2010-09-16 Thread kstubs
How do you chain together findAll and each?  I have a Json object
which I would like to filter, and was thinking to findAll, followed by
an each on the findAll results.  What is the best approach?

Thanks,
Karl..

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.