[widgets] PC ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote: On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com (mailto:w...@chaals.com) wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: Chaals, Marcos, Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we have consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the spec that satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is we start a new CfC. Works for me. Marcos, should I just send you a snippet for references? Yep. Would appreciate that. To move this forward more quickly, I ended up adding them myself. Please check the doc over and let me know if it's all good to go. I think I've addressed everything.
Re: [widgets] PC ready for pub - Re: CfC: publish Widgets PC as a Proposed Edited Recommendation; deadline August 8
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:46:00 +0200, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote: On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 13:36, Marcos Caceres wrote: On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:10, Chaals McCathieNevile w...@chaals.com On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:52:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com (mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com) wrote: Based on this discussion, I concluded this CfC has failed to show we have consensus. As such, after you two have agreed on a version of the spec that satisfies all of Chaals' concerns, my recommendation is we start a new CfC. Works for me. Marcos, should I just send you a snippet for references? Yep. Would appreciate that. To move this forward more quickly, I ended up adding them myself. Please check the doc over and let me know if it's all good to go. I think I've addressed everything. Looks good to me. cheers Chaals -- Chaals - standards declaimer
