Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-04 Thread Mister IT Guru

On 2 Apr 2012, at 10:12, Craig Dunn wrote:

 
 Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people can 
 post dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links
 
 [snip]
 
 Without wanting to pigeon hole or stereotype anyone, my experience from the 
 IRC channel in particular is that dumb questions that get asked often show 
 that the poster has not read through the online documentation and has jumped 
 straight into the community support channels instead. No-one minds helping a 
 struggling beginner, but the old him who helps himself saying applies and I 
 think for most people, if they genuinely read the excellent language guide 
 properly they would answer the majority of beginner questions on their own.  
 Some people take offense when told on IRC to RTFM, or given an anchor link to 
 the docs in response to a question, but it simply is the best source of 
 information to their issues.
 
 Providing a beginners mailing list IMO would only encourage people to bypass 
 the docs even more.
 
 2p/w :)
 
 Craig
 
 -- 
 Craig Dunn | http://www.craigdunn.org
 Yahoo/Skype: craigrdunn | Twitter: @crayfishX

Good Evening Craig, and thanks for your reply! I appreciate your comments, but 
having reflected more on the point
 Providing a beginners mailing list IMO would only encourage people to bypass 
the docs even more

While this may be true, the number of people searching, finding links via 
twitter, or  having a casual intrest, is only going to go up. And the docs are 
written from the perspective of a technical manual. Docs are great and I 
applaud the effort that goes into it. But it's still just documentation. When 
your in school, college, university, insert place of education here, a 
massive text book is not dropped in your lap on day one, and then your sent off 
into the world.

Every FOSS project pretty much comes with documentation these days - yet we 
have support forums. The same for a lot of technical products that are sold in 
our shops, but everyone has support lines. If documentation worked, most of us 
will be out of work.

I think the community aspect is the key.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-04 Thread Mister IT Guru
+1 For Dens idea. I use the stack exchange and a few related linked sites, and 
it's awesome! Google it, sign up, find some puppet questions that have been 
posted there. You guys might be able to help :)


On 3 Apr 2012, at 06:53, Denmat wrote:

 How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of the 
 issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard to 
 search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.
 
 -1 for separate lists.
 
 Den
 
 On 03/04/2012, at 14:30, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
 
 Hey, we've been having some mailing list discussion on and off inside
 of Puppet Labs too. Obviously we have a large community that we are
 trying to appeal to, and we keep doing our best to create the
 experience for the user-base.
 
 Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.
 
 Pros:
 * Less code fragments in emails
 * Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions
 
 Cons:
 * Fragmentation of the user-base
 * Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
 * New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
 more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list
 
 What I really think we need, is a way to provide knowledge to new
 users in an efficient (and non fragmented) way.  In the past we had a
 horrible problem with documentation all over the place, wiki issues,
 blogs from everybody and their brother, etc.  Today, we have narrowed
 those problems with the Learning Puppet series.
 (http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/), and lots of other
 documentation improvements on docs.puppetlabs.com.
 
 The points about FAQ make complete sense.  We'd like to address this
 with proper documentation and some other online presence that will be
 rolled out in the in the next quarter or so.
 
 As an interrum, could we have a wiki page where we place questions
 that get asked frequently and have no (or incomplete) associated
 documentation?
 http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequent_Questions_Without_Answers
 
 
 We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
 see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
 because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
 the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
 helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
 but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
 everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.
 
 I hope I've attempted to answer some of the concerns.  I am totally
 willing to revisit this in 90 days or so if the community thinks we
 should be handling this differently.
 
 This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please
 weigh in if you have opinions.
 
 Michael Stahnke
 Community Manager
 
 
 
 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
 Good Evening Guys,
 
 Let me start by saying that I really admire how far puppet has come in the 
 last year or so, with the launch of the Enterprise version, Puppet Forge 
 and the other innovations from within Puppet Labs, and in particular the 
 community participation. I love the mailing list, even though I've been 
 lurking for over a year. It's this inner shame that compels me to raise 
 this issue. I apologise if this is not the place to mention this, but hey, 
 you've already got this far, so keep reading!
 
 I get stage fright looking at some of the code fragments that people post 
 to the list and then say This is how far I've got and I'm trying to do X 
 where X is something pretty complex/unique doesn't quite seem like best 
 practice or something that you'll find on a general use linux box. While I 
 have no problem or even issue with this, the problem I find is that when I 
 tell my admin geek friends about puppet, they go to google and switch off 
 when they see what they view as buckets of work to just get started.
 
 We have a lot of Puppet users on Mac, BSD, and now Windows too, so
 it's not just Linux.
 
 
 In a nutshell the perception and feedback I get and I feel this myself, is 
 that the competency level of those whose regularly participate in this 
 list, and in other internet forums may just be a bit too good. I feel as if 
 puppet is lacking a sort of nursery area. After all, everyone here is 
 already a 'professional' or so we like to think!
 
 Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people can 
 post dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links to 
 blog entries, you tube videos (something which I noticed is lacking for 
 puppet, again making it hard for me to evangelise about it, to even get 
 clients to look at it), and get up to speed with you guys.
 
 I would like a Puppet Nursery - Or failing that, can we get a puppet 
 advance list? :)
 
 I'm just saying - It worked for a different project, that's part of how 
 ubuntu started 

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-04 Thread Mister IT Guru
Thanks for the replies from all the puppet lab guys, and the members of this 
list. It really brighten my day to read all the responses. I've learnt that 
maybe I'm not so stupid after all! Ah yes, and that a second list is a no no!! 
(It wasn't my best suggestion, but the community helped me see the light)

I am really looking forward to Integrated Platform Team Puppet are currently 
working on.

It goes without saying that the more content that gets gobbled up by google and 
indexed, the more lonely newbies that will be rescued by that search bar.

I do have a more confidence puppet. I hope I didn't panic any of Team Puppet, 
you guys are doing a great job, honestly, I've had my butt pulled out the fire 
a good few times because of my basic of the most basic puppet setup, so I'm a 
fan

On 3 Apr 2012, at 21:13, Nigel Kersten wrote:

 
 We do want to be running this, primarily because we want to provide an 
 integrated platform that includes a bit more than just the QA site itself. 
 We'd like to be able to integrate profiles across the Forge, a QA site and 
 even the bug tracker.
 
 It would be great if you were on a QA site, asking questions about 
 developing modules, and to be able to see that the person answering your 
 question has published several awesome Puppet modules that are really 
 popular. Vice versa, it would be great to be able to look at a module and see 
 that the author is a highly engaged member of the community.
 
 So all in all, we do want to provide this as a service by us, and it's 
 difficult to get that level of integration with StackExchange. 
 
 I would like to point out that we've got a growing ServerFault community 
 under the 'puppet' tag, and there are some great people answering Puppet 
 questions there.
 
 This is clearly an even more pressing need than we'd been thinking, so we're 
 going to try and accelerate this.
 
 
 -- 
 Nigel Kersten
 Product Manager, Puppet Labs

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-04 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
 Thanks for the replies from all the puppet lab guys, and the members of this 
 list. It really brighten my day to read all the responses. I've learnt that 
 maybe I'm not so stupid after all! Ah yes, and that a second list is a no 
 no!! (It wasn't my best suggestion, but the community helped me see the light)

 I am really looking forward to Integrated Platform Team Puppet are currently 
 working on.

 It goes without saying that the more content that gets gobbled up by google 
 and indexed, the more lonely newbies that will be rescued by that search bar.

 I do have a more confidence puppet. I hope I didn't panic any of Team Puppet, 
 you guys are doing a great job, honestly, I've had my butt pulled out the 
 fire a good few times because of my basic of the most basic puppet setup, so 
 I'm a fan

No apologies necessary at all, and certainly no panic :)

We also love hearing stories about Puppet pulling butts out of fires :)


 On 3 Apr 2012, at 21:13, Nigel Kersten wrote:


 We do want to be running this, primarily because we want to provide an 
 integrated platform that includes a bit more than just the QA site itself. 
 We'd like to be able to integrate profiles across the Forge, a QA site and 
 even the bug tracker.

 It would be great if you were on a QA site, asking questions about 
 developing modules, and to be able to see that the person answering your 
 question has published several awesome Puppet modules that are really 
 popular. Vice versa, it would be great to be able to look at a module and 
 see that the author is a highly engaged member of the community.

 So all in all, we do want to provide this as a service by us, and it's 
 difficult to get that level of integration with StackExchange.

 I would like to point out that we've got a growing ServerFault community 
 under the 'puppet' tag, and there are some great people answering Puppet 
 questions there.

 This is clearly an even more pressing need than we'd been thinking, so we're 
 going to try and accelerate this.


 --
 Nigel Kersten
 Product Manager, Puppet Labs

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.




-- 
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Pablo Fernandez
I am personally completely against splitting the list. It will basically 
force everyone to be in the two lists, and even worse, those with a 
question that does not get an answer, will try with the second list.


Besides, when you have a question, how do you know if it's a difficult 
one? Sometimes you just hit a bug when you are newby, and sometimes you 
are missing a comma when you are expert.


Then, for people like me that are learning, it is very useful to see all 
those questions getting answer, you learn really a lot from other's 
questions.


I would really focus on the documentation. Maybe going through it, 
checking which paragraphs are more confusing or hide not-so-easy 
concepts or common misconceptions, and back up with better real-life 
examples, together with a FAQ, would probably remove 30% of the 
questions there are here.


Thanks for this list!
Pablo

On 04/03/2012 07:56 AM, Brian Gupta wrote:

Michael,

Would you guys consider standing up a shapado instance? 
http://shapado.com/ (It's basically an FLOSS clone of stackoverflow, 
and is great for QA type stuff.) You could stand it up as 
ask.puppetlabs.com http://ask.puppetlabs.com, and point new users 
there for questions. One of the big issues of puppet-users, is simple 
the volume of emails that are blasted into ones inbox. (Ignoring the 
diverse nature of the various discussions.) In addition, I have a 
sense that IRC and mailing lists are a bit old-school, and can be 
intimidating to new users.


Personally, I don't love mailing lists, in that I don't want to have 
to subscribe to EVERYTHING, to get the answer to a single question.


I'd also like to address Scott's critique of FAQs. I think that no 
matter how good and complete the documentation, there will be 
frequently asked questions. It's just the nature of the beast.


Thanks,
Brian

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Michael Stahnke 
stah...@puppetlabs.com mailto:stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:


Hey, we've been having some mailing list discussion on and off inside
of Puppet Labs too. Obviously we have a large community that we are
trying to appeal to, and we keep doing our best to create the
experience for the user-base.

Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.

Pros:
* Less code fragments in emails
* Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions

Cons:
* Fragmentation of the user-base
* Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
* New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list

What I really think we need, is a way to provide knowledge to new
users in an efficient (and non fragmented) way.  In the past we had a
horrible problem with documentation all over the place, wiki issues,
blogs from everybody and their brother, etc.  Today, we have narrowed
those problems with the Learning Puppet series.
(http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/), and lots of other
documentation improvements on docs.puppetlabs.com
http://docs.puppetlabs.com.

The points about FAQ make complete sense.  We'd like to address this
with proper documentation and some other online presence that will be
rolled out in the in the next quarter or so.

As an interrum, could we have a wiki page where we place questions
that get asked frequently and have no (or incomplete) associated
documentation?

http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequent_Questions_Without_Answers


We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.

I hope I've attempted to answer some of the concerns.  I am totally
willing to revisit this in 90 days or so if the community thinks we
should be handling this differently.

This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please
weigh in if you have opinions.

Michael Stahnke
Community Manager



On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru
misteritg...@gmx.com mailto:misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
 Good Evening Guys,

 Let me start by saying that I really admire how far puppet has
come in the last year or so, with the launch of the Enterprise
version, Puppet Forge and the other innovations from within Puppet
Labs, and in particular the community participation. I love the
mailing list, even though I've been lurking for over a year. It's
this inner shame that compels me to raise this issue. I
apologise if this is not the place to mention 

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Dan White
For searching older info, try 
http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/

But I concur

-1 for separation

“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in 
the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Bill Waterson (Calvin  Hobbes)

- Denmat tu2bg...@gmail.com wrote:
 How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of the 
 issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard to 
 search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.
 
 -1 for separate lists.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Scott Merrill
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
 Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.

 Pros:
 * Less code fragments in emails
 * Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions

 Cons:
 * Fragmentation of the user-base
 * Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
 * New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
 more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list

I'm -1 on separating the list. While there's a lot of discussion that
isn't relevant or interesting to me on the list, there's been a
non-trivial number of posts that have directly addressed issues I was
researching, or have helped me work through stumbling blocks. Some of
it is simple serendipity, but I'd have lost out on those things if I
was only subscribed to the -newbie list.

 We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
 see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
 because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
 the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
 helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
 but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
 everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.

For what it's worth, my experiences in the IRC channel have been
nothing but positive. Yes, my questions have been sometimes answered
with a simple link to existing documentation, but in most cases thus
far those links have been exactly what I needed. And it's worth
pointing out that the links were not provided with aggression or
derision, but a matter-of-fact here's what you need.


Because there are multiple ways to use Puppet to resolve the problems
of configuration management, there seems to me to be a gulf between
what's documented and what people are using in production. Stated
another way, there's a gap between the how and the why.

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Brian Gupta brian.gu...@brandorr.comwrote:

 Michael,

 Would you guys consider standing up a shapado instance?
 http://shapado.com/ (It's basically an FLOSS clone of stackoverflow, and
 is great for QA type stuff.) You could stand it up as ask.puppetlabs.com,
 and point new users there for questions. One of the big issues of
 puppet-users, is simple the volume of emails that are blasted into ones
 inbox. (Ignoring the diverse nature of the various discussions.) In
 addition, I have a sense that IRC and mailing lists are a bit old-school,
 and can be intimidating to new users.


We've had similar thoughts about accessibility and a QA site, and have
been thinking seriously about a FLOSS clone of stackoverflow.

Last time we had a look around OSQA http://www.osqa.net/ seemed to be the
best candidate, thanks for the Shapado link Brian.





 Personally, I don't love mailing lists, in that I don't want to have to
 subscribe to EVERYTHING, to get the answer to a single question.

 I'd also like to address Scott's critique of FAQs. I think that no matter
 how good and complete the documentation, there will be frequently asked
 questions. It's just the nature of the beast.

 Thanks,
 Brian

 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Michael Stahnke 
 stah...@puppetlabs.comwrote:

 Hey, we've been having some mailing list discussion on and off inside
 of Puppet Labs too. Obviously we have a large community that we are
 trying to appeal to, and we keep doing our best to create the
 experience for the user-base.

 Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.

 Pros:
 * Less code fragments in emails
 * Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions

 Cons:
 * Fragmentation of the user-base
 * Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
 * New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
 more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list

 What I really think we need, is a way to provide knowledge to new
 users in an efficient (and non fragmented) way.  In the past we had a
 horrible problem with documentation all over the place, wiki issues,
 blogs from everybody and their brother, etc.  Today, we have narrowed
 those problems with the Learning Puppet series.
 (http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/), and lots of other
 documentation improvements on docs.puppetlabs.com.

 The points about FAQ make complete sense.  We'd like to address this
 with proper documentation and some other online presence that will be
 rolled out in the in the next quarter or so.

 As an interrum, could we have a wiki page where we place questions
 that get asked frequently and have no (or incomplete) associated
 documentation?

 http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequent_Questions_Without_Answers


 We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
 see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
 because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
 the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
 helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
 but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
 everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.

 I hope I've attempted to answer some of the concerns.  I am totally
 willing to revisit this in 90 days or so if the community thinks we
 should be handling this differently.

 This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please
 weigh in if you have opinions.

 Michael Stahnke
 Community Manager



 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com
 wrote:
  Good Evening Guys,
 
  Let me start by saying that I really admire how far puppet has come in
 the last year or so, with the launch of the Enterprise version, Puppet
 Forge and the other innovations from within Puppet Labs, and in particular
 the community participation. I love the mailing list, even though I've been
 lurking for over a year. It's this inner shame that compels me to raise
 this issue. I apologise if this is not the place to mention this, but hey,
 you've already got this far, so keep reading!
 
  I get stage fright looking at some of the code fragments that people
 post to the list and then say This is how far I've got and I'm trying to
 do X where X is something pretty complex/unique doesn't quite seem like
 best practice or something that you'll find on a general use linux box.
 While I have no problem or even issue with this, the problem I find is that
 when I tell my admin geek friends about puppet, they go to google and
 switch off when they see what they view as buckets of work to just get
 started.

 We have a lot of Puppet users on Mac, BSD, and now Windows too, so
 it's not just Linux.

 
  In a nutshell the perception and feedback I get and I feel this myself,
 is that the competency level of those whose regularly participate in this
 list, and in other internet 

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 22:53, Denmat tu2bg...@gmail.com wrote:
 How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of the 
 issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard to 
 search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.

I would absolutely support getting a new StackExchange site for
configuration management or something going.  What it really needs is
someone to drive that forward - you can't just ask for one, it needs a
community.

-- 
Daniel Pittman
⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com
♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Brian Gupta
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@puppetlabs.comwrote:

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 22:53, Denmat tu2bg...@gmail.com wrote:
  How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of
 the issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard
 to search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.

 I would absolutely support getting a new StackExchange site for
 configuration management or something going.  What it really needs is
 someone to drive that forward - you can't just ask for one, it needs a
 community.


Daniel, mmm.. do we want a general purpose configuration management site or
a puppet specific one? I'd be willing to help host and setup a puppet
specific one, however, I'd have thought that would be something that
puppetlabs would want to own/run. Feel free to discuss internally, and let
me know which way you guys want to go.

Thanks,
Brian


 --
 Daniel Pittman
 ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com
 ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Puppet Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.




-- 
http://aws.amazon.com/solutions/solution-providers/brandorr/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Brian Gupta brian.gu...@brandorr.comwrote:

 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@puppetlabs.comwrote:

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 22:53, Denmat tu2bg...@gmail.com wrote:
  How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of
 the issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard
 to search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.

 I would absolutely support getting a new StackExchange site for
 configuration management or something going.  What it really needs is
 someone to drive that forward - you can't just ask for one, it needs a
 community.


 Daniel, mmm.. do we want a general purpose configuration management site
 or a puppet specific one? I'd be willing to help host and setup a puppet
 specific one, however, I'd have thought that would be something that
 puppetlabs would want to own/run. Feel free to discuss internally, and let
 me know which way you guys want to go.


Hey Brian, thanks for the offer, it's much appreciated.

We do want to be running this, primarily because we want to provide an
integrated platform that includes a bit more than just the QA site itself.
We'd like to be able to integrate profiles across the Forge, a QA site and
even the bug tracker.

It would be great if you were on a QA site, asking questions about
developing modules, and to be able to see that the person answering your
question has published several awesome Puppet modules that are really
popular. Vice versa, it would be great to be able to look at a module and
see that the author is a highly engaged member of the community.

So all in all, we do want to provide this as a service by us, and it's
difficult to get that level of integration with StackExchange.

I would like to point out that we've got a growing ServerFault community
under the 'puppet' tag, and there are some great people answering Puppet
questions there.

This is clearly an even more pressing need than we'd been thinking, so
we're going to try and accelerate this.


-- 
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-03 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:


 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Brian Gupta brian.gu...@brandorr.com
 wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@puppetlabs.com
 wrote:

 On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 22:53, Denmat tu2bg...@gmail.com wrote:
  How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of
  the issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard
  to search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.

 I would absolutely support getting a new StackExchange site for
 configuration management or something going.  What it really needs is
 someone to drive that forward - you can't just ask for one, it needs a
 community.


 Daniel, mmm.. do we want a general purpose configuration management site
 or a puppet specific one? I'd be willing to help host and setup a puppet
 specific one, however, I'd have thought that would be something that
 puppetlabs would want to own/run. Feel free to discuss internally, and let
 me know which way you guys want to go.


 Hey Brian, thanks for the offer, it's much appreciated.

 We do want to be running this, primarily because we want to provide an
 integrated platform that includes a bit more than just the QA site itself.
 We'd like to be able to integrate profiles across the Forge, a QA site and
 even the bug tracker.

 It would be great if you were on a QA site, asking questions about
 developing modules, and to be able to see that the person answering your
 question has published several awesome Puppet modules that are really
 popular. Vice versa, it would be great to be able to look at a module and
 see that the author is a highly engaged member of the community.

 So all in all, we do want to provide this as a service by us, and it's
 difficult to get that level of integration with StackExchange.

 I would like to point out that we've got a growing ServerFault community
 under the 'puppet' tag, and there are some great people answering Puppet
 questions there.

 This is clearly an even more pressing need than we'd been thinking, so we're
 going to try and accelerate this.

And to post the actual ServerFault link:

http://serverfault.com/questions/tagged/puppet





-- 
Nigel Kersten
Product Manager, Puppet Labs

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-02 Thread Craig Dunn



Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people can post 
dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links


[snip]

Without wanting to pigeon hole or stereotype anyone, my experience from 
the IRC channel in particular is that dumb questions that get asked 
often show that the poster has not read through the online documentation 
and has jumped straight into the community support channels instead. 
No-one minds helping a struggling beginner, but the old him who helps 
himself saying applies and I think for most people, if they genuinely 
read the excellent language guide properly they would answer the 
majority of beginner questions on their own.  Some people take offense 
when told on IRC to RTFM, or given an anchor link to the docs in 
response to a question, but it simply is the best source of information 
to their issues.


Providing a beginners mailing list IMO would only encourage people to 
bypass the docs even more.


2p/w :)

Craig

--
Craig Dunn | http://www.craigdunn.org
Yahoo/Skype: craigrdunn | Twitter: @crayfishX

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet 
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-02 Thread Chad Huneycutt
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Craig Dunn cr...@craigdunn.org wrote:

 Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people can
 post dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links


 [snip]

 Without wanting to pigeon hole or stereotype anyone, my experience from the
 IRC channel in particular is that dumb questions that get asked often show
 that the poster has not read through the online documentation and has jumped
 straight into the community support channels instead. No-one minds helping a
 struggling beginner, but the old him who helps himself saying applies and
 I think for most people, if they genuinely read the excellent language guide
 properly they would answer the majority of beginner questions on their own.
  Some people take offense when told on IRC to RTFM, or given an anchor link
 to the docs in response to a question, but it simply is the best source of
 information to their issues.

 Providing a beginners mailing list IMO would only encourage people to bypass
 the docs even more.

I do not agree with this sentiment.  The docs are a great reference,
but they can certainly be overwhelming to a beginner.  We all should
definitely make folks feel comfortable asking whatever questions they
have.  If the fear is that the IRC channel and mailing list would get
bogged down with folks asking the same beginner questions over and
over, I offer a couple thoughts:
   * we can aways go with the OP's suggestions and start new avenues
for such questions
   * answering easy questions scales: that is, the easier a question
is, the more people that can answer it.
   * The corollary to the previous point is that if you find answering
easy questions tedious, you do not have to; someone else can most
likely pick it up
   * Opening the floodgates to the easy questions makes it very
obvious what needs to go in the FAQ :-)

I have been helped out so much by the fine folks on IRC that I love it
when I get a chance to help someone out with any problem. ;-)


-- 
Chad M. Huneycutt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-02 Thread Scott Merrill
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Chad Huneycutt chad.huneyc...@gmail.com wrote:
   * Opening the floodgates to the easy questions makes it very
 obvious what needs to go in the FAQ :-)

As a slight aside, I think that a list of frequently asked questions
is a statement that the documentation is incomplete. If those
questions are so frequently asked, why isn't the documentation updated
to account for them in the first place?

See also Rich Bowen's Write a better FM book:
   http://betterfm.org/

Cheers,
Scott

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.



Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-02 Thread Michael Stahnke
Hey, we've been having some mailing list discussion on and off inside
of Puppet Labs too. Obviously we have a large community that we are
trying to appeal to, and we keep doing our best to create the
experience for the user-base.

Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.

Pros:
* Less code fragments in emails
* Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions

Cons:
* Fragmentation of the user-base
* Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
* New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list

What I really think we need, is a way to provide knowledge to new
users in an efficient (and non fragmented) way.  In the past we had a
horrible problem with documentation all over the place, wiki issues,
blogs from everybody and their brother, etc.  Today, we have narrowed
those problems with the Learning Puppet series.
(http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/), and lots of other
documentation improvements on docs.puppetlabs.com.

The points about FAQ make complete sense.  We'd like to address this
with proper documentation and some other online presence that will be
rolled out in the in the next quarter or so.

As an interrum, could we have a wiki page where we place questions
that get asked frequently and have no (or incomplete) associated
documentation?
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequent_Questions_Without_Answers


We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.

I hope I've attempted to answer some of the concerns.  I am totally
willing to revisit this in 90 days or so if the community thinks we
should be handling this differently.

This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please
weigh in if you have opinions.

Michael Stahnke
Community Manager



On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
 Good Evening Guys,

 Let me start by saying that I really admire how far puppet has come in the 
 last year or so, with the launch of the Enterprise version, Puppet Forge and 
 the other innovations from within Puppet Labs, and in particular the 
 community participation. I love the mailing list, even though I've been 
 lurking for over a year. It's this inner shame that compels me to raise 
 this issue. I apologise if this is not the place to mention this, but hey, 
 you've already got this far, so keep reading!

 I get stage fright looking at some of the code fragments that people post 
 to the list and then say This is how far I've got and I'm trying to do X 
 where X is something pretty complex/unique doesn't quite seem like best 
 practice or something that you'll find on a general use linux box. While I 
 have no problem or even issue with this, the problem I find is that when I 
 tell my admin geek friends about puppet, they go to google and switch off 
 when they see what they view as buckets of work to just get started.

We have a lot of Puppet users on Mac, BSD, and now Windows too, so
it's not just Linux.


 In a nutshell the perception and feedback I get and I feel this myself, is 
 that the competency level of those whose regularly participate in this list, 
 and in other internet forums may just be a bit too good. I feel as if puppet 
 is lacking a sort of nursery area. After all, everyone here is already a 
 'professional' or so we like to think!

 Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people can 
 post dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links to blog 
 entries, you tube videos (something which I noticed is lacking for puppet, 
 again making it hard for me to evangelise about it, to even get clients to 
 look at it), and get up to speed with you guys.

 I would like a Puppet Nursery - Or failing that, can we get a puppet advance 
 list? :)

 I'm just saying - It worked for a different project, that's part of how 
 ubuntu started to take over the world, it just became accessible to the 
 casual user. Well, there are a bucket load of causal professional linux 
 admins, who I fear may dismiss taking up puppet because they just can't get 
 the time together to learn or keep up with those who puppet 24/7

 It's just an observation, with a request thrown in - If I annoyed you, upset 
 you, hurt your ego or made you feel bad in any way, I'm sorry. If you wish to 
 take it up with me personally, no problem, have your people call my people, 
 and we'll set up the meet - I'm a big guy so bring backup! (just kidding, 
 love peace and all that!) - I'm hoping to stimulate some 

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-02 Thread Denmat
How about a 'serverfault' or 'stackoverflow' or the like site? One of the 
issues I find is that previous answers are lost in mail lists and hard to 
search for. IRC isn't much help for searching previous answers either.

-1 for separate lists.

Den

On 03/04/2012, at 14:30, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:

 Hey, we've been having some mailing list discussion on and off inside
 of Puppet Labs too. Obviously we have a large community that we are
 trying to appeal to, and we keep doing our best to create the
 experience for the user-base.
 
 Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.
 
 Pros:
 * Less code fragments in emails
 * Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions
 
 Cons:
 * Fragmentation of the user-base
 * Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
 * New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
 more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list
 
 What I really think we need, is a way to provide knowledge to new
 users in an efficient (and non fragmented) way.  In the past we had a
 horrible problem with documentation all over the place, wiki issues,
 blogs from everybody and their brother, etc.  Today, we have narrowed
 those problems with the Learning Puppet series.
 (http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/), and lots of other
 documentation improvements on docs.puppetlabs.com.
 
 The points about FAQ make complete sense.  We'd like to address this
 with proper documentation and some other online presence that will be
 rolled out in the in the next quarter or so.
 
 As an interrum, could we have a wiki page where we place questions
 that get asked frequently and have no (or incomplete) associated
 documentation?
 http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequent_Questions_Without_Answers
 
 
 We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
 see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
 because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
 the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
 helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
 but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
 everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.
 
 I hope I've attempted to answer some of the concerns.  I am totally
 willing to revisit this in 90 days or so if the community thinks we
 should be handling this differently.
 
 This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please
 weigh in if you have opinions.
 
 Michael Stahnke
 Community Manager
 
 
 
 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote:
 Good Evening Guys,
 
 Let me start by saying that I really admire how far puppet has come in the 
 last year or so, with the launch of the Enterprise version, Puppet Forge and 
 the other innovations from within Puppet Labs, and in particular the 
 community participation. I love the mailing list, even though I've been 
 lurking for over a year. It's this inner shame that compels me to raise 
 this issue. I apologise if this is not the place to mention this, but hey, 
 you've already got this far, so keep reading!
 
 I get stage fright looking at some of the code fragments that people post 
 to the list and then say This is how far I've got and I'm trying to do X 
 where X is something pretty complex/unique doesn't quite seem like best 
 practice or something that you'll find on a general use linux box. While I 
 have no problem or even issue with this, the problem I find is that when I 
 tell my admin geek friends about puppet, they go to google and switch off 
 when they see what they view as buckets of work to just get started.
 
 We have a lot of Puppet users on Mac, BSD, and now Windows too, so
 it's not just Linux.
 
 
 In a nutshell the perception and feedback I get and I feel this myself, is 
 that the competency level of those whose regularly participate in this list, 
 and in other internet forums may just be a bit too good. I feel as if puppet 
 is lacking a sort of nursery area. After all, everyone here is already a 
 'professional' or so we like to think!
 
 Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people can 
 post dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links to 
 blog entries, you tube videos (something which I noticed is lacking for 
 puppet, again making it hard for me to evangelise about it, to even get 
 clients to look at it), and get up to speed with you guys.
 
 I would like a Puppet Nursery - Or failing that, can we get a puppet advance 
 list? :)
 
 I'm just saying - It worked for a different project, that's part of how 
 ubuntu started to take over the world, it just became accessible to the 
 casual user. Well, there are a bucket load of causal professional linux 
 admins, who I fear may dismiss taking up puppet because they just can't get 
 the time together to learn or keep up with 

Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Beginners: New list suggestion?

2012-04-02 Thread Brian Gupta
Michael,

Would you guys consider standing up a shapado instance?
http://shapado.com/(It's basically an FLOSS clone of stackoverflow,
and is great for QA type
stuff.) You could stand it up as ask.puppetlabs.com, and point new users
there for questions. One of the big issues of puppet-users, is simple the
volume of emails that are blasted into ones inbox. (Ignoring the diverse
nature of the various discussions.) In addition, I have a sense that IRC
and mailing lists are a bit old-school, and can be intimidating to new
users.

Personally, I don't love mailing lists, in that I don't want to have to
subscribe to EVERYTHING, to get the answer to a single question.

I'd also like to address Scott's critique of FAQs. I think that no matter
how good and complete the documentation, there will be frequently asked
questions. It's just the nature of the beast.

Thanks,
Brian

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.comwrote:

 Hey, we've been having some mailing list discussion on and off inside
 of Puppet Labs too. Obviously we have a large community that we are
 trying to appeal to, and we keep doing our best to create the
 experience for the user-base.

 Breaking the users list into two lists has its pros and cons.

 Pros:
 * Less code fragments in emails
 * Advanced users not bogged down with new user questions

 Cons:
 * Fragmentation of the user-base
 * Who will monitor/answer questions on a new user list?
 * New people may not learn from more experienced people, because the
 more experienced users may not subscribe to the new-users list

 What I really think we need, is a way to provide knowledge to new
 users in an efficient (and non fragmented) way.  In the past we had a
 horrible problem with documentation all over the place, wiki issues,
 blogs from everybody and their brother, etc.  Today, we have narrowed
 those problems with the Learning Puppet series.
 (http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/), and lots of other
 documentation improvements on docs.puppetlabs.com.

 The points about FAQ make complete sense.  We'd like to address this
 with proper documentation and some other online presence that will be
 rolled out in the in the next quarter or so.

 As an interrum, could we have a wiki page where we place questions
 that get asked frequently and have no (or incomplete) associated
 documentation?

 http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Frequent_Questions_Without_Answers


 We also hope that IRC is helpful and remains helpful.  I don't often
 see RTFM comments coming out in #puppet.  When I do, it's quite often
 because their exact question was already answered, with citations, and
 the user still didn't read it.  Also in this thread somebody mentioned
 helping those willing to help themselves.  That's a fair statement,
 but we really want to make this an accepting community to make
 everybody better at their workloads with Puppet.

 I hope I've attempted to answer some of the concerns.  I am totally
 willing to revisit this in 90 days or so if the community thinks we
 should be handling this differently.

 This is also by no means designed to close this discussion, so please
 weigh in if you have opinions.

 Michael Stahnke
 Community Manager



 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com
 wrote:
  Good Evening Guys,
 
  Let me start by saying that I really admire how far puppet has come in
 the last year or so, with the launch of the Enterprise version, Puppet
 Forge and the other innovations from within Puppet Labs, and in particular
 the community participation. I love the mailing list, even though I've been
 lurking for over a year. It's this inner shame that compels me to raise
 this issue. I apologise if this is not the place to mention this, but hey,
 you've already got this far, so keep reading!
 
  I get stage fright looking at some of the code fragments that people
 post to the list and then say This is how far I've got and I'm trying to
 do X where X is something pretty complex/unique doesn't quite seem like
 best practice or something that you'll find on a general use linux box.
 While I have no problem or even issue with this, the problem I find is that
 when I tell my admin geek friends about puppet, they go to google and
 switch off when they see what they view as buckets of work to just get
 started.

 We have a lot of Puppet users on Mac, BSD, and now Windows too, so
 it's not just Linux.

 
  In a nutshell the perception and feedback I get and I feel this myself,
 is that the competency level of those whose regularly participate in this
 list, and in other internet forums may just be a bit too good. I feel as if
 puppet is lacking a sort of nursery area. After all, everyone here is
 already a 'professional' or so we like to think!
 
  Would it be a good idea to have a puppet beginners list, where people
 can post dumb questions, and maybe have some patient people posting links
 to blog entries, you tube videos (something