Re: [Qgis-developer] Good news from Qt - more modules available to opensource
Great news ! This example would make nviz useless for me : https://doc.qt.io/QtDataVisualization/qtdatavisualization-volumetric-example.html Le 13/01/2016 22:54, Nyall Dawson a écrit : Here's some good news coming from the Qt camp - http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/ What this means is that we'll now be able to take advantage of modules which were previously only available to commercial Qt customers. For me, having access to Qt Charts is a big one. We could finally have a decent, good-looking, fully integrated charting library usable by composer, etc. See eg http://doc.qt.io/QtCharts/qtcharts-barchart-example.html, http://doc.qt.io/QtCharts/qtcharts-areachart-example.html, http://doc.qt.io/QtCharts/qtcharts-percentbarchart-example.html, http://doc.qt.io/QtCharts/qtcharts-polarchart-example.html, http://doc.qt.io/QtCharts/qtcharts-scatterchart-example.html and http://doc.qt.io/QtCharts/qtcharts-temperaturerecords-example.html Qt Data Visualisation also looks useful, eg http://doc.qt.io/QtDataVisualization/qtdatavisualization-bars-example.html, http://doc.qt.io/QtDataVisualization/qtdatavisualization-qmlsurface-example.html Great stuff! (When we finally move to Qt5 only that is ;) ) Nyall ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Stress about release plans
Le 21/07/2014 17:35, Lene Fischer a écrit : ·A long term stable version for ex. 12 months with bugfix only Those sponsoring a feature may feel that a year of wait until they find it in a public is quite long. ·A developer version for 4 months with new features and bugfixes = Stable version with short bugfix-period = New developer…….. Most of the users of this dev version will be common users, before the release of 2.0 I often saw 1.9 versions installed and people on support forums suggesting the use of qgis-dev I do know it will give the developers more work – I do know it will cost more money – But I´m sure a lot of administrators will recommend, use and support if we get a more stable environment. How many administrator are currently pushing to sponsor msi packages for their deployment ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] What's up with the 2.0.2 designation?
Le 26/09/2013 22:17, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit : Hi Anita, On Thu, 26. Sep 2013 at 21:42:34 +0200, Anita Graser wrote: I realize developers and packagers are stretched thin but I think we should get the release right. Not fixing errors in the packaging is not what I would think of when it was decided to not have bug fixing releases. IMHO fixing packaging issues doesn't require a new release. Jürgen Hi, It does or otherwise most users will never notice that a newer and different package is available ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] September 1 branch for release
No, it was just a wrong commit. The situation is solved but it shows that a transifex option would be a good addition. Le 02/09/2013 13:26, Tim Sutton a écrit : Hi Jean Roc is that not maybe a side effect of the Sextante - Processing rename? Regards Tim On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, MORREALE Jean Roc jr.morre...@enoreth.net mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote: Hi, I got back yesterday from my only week of vacation of this year, I have no problem with people contributing directly to this while I'm not here but it seems that a few hundred translations I did in my previous commit (http://goo.gl/VsCYhL, all the processing/sextante were done) are now empty. The count was 8978 done, it is now 8717. Is there a way to solve this without redoing them one by one ? Which given the time before release and my availability will not be possible. Le 31/08/2013 15:59, Werner Macho a écrit : Hi Regis! I took your file and committed it directly - Hope JR will be ok with it .. thanks for the update kind regards Werner ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] September 1 branch for release
Hi, I got back yesterday from my only week of vacation of this year, I have no problem with people contributing directly to this while I'm not here but it seems that a few hundred translations I did in my previous commit (http://goo.gl/VsCYhL, all the processing/sextante were done) are now empty. The count was 8978 done, it is now 8717. Is there a way to solve this without redoing them one by one ? Which given the time before release and my availability will not be possible. Le 31/08/2013 15:59, Werner Macho a écrit : Hi Regis! I took your file and committed it directly - Hope JR will be ok with it .. thanks for the update kind regards Werner ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Renaming SEXTANTE
+1 here for dropping the SEXTANTE name for the same reason we now have a Vector menu instead of fTools. I would vote for a processing menu as sextante goes beyond analysis ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Can we remove old labeling from the UI
What is the status ? Are we going to keep a deprecated label tab for the next 3 years ? Le 26/05/2013 14:37, Nathan Woodrow a écrit : Can we finally remove the old label UI from the layer properties dialog? Could we remove it by default and just enable it for old project that have old labels defined. - Nathan ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Download stats : 558909 ?
558909 Hi, I'm using these two pages to get an actual download count of qgis 1.8 and by cumuling all the page views on the *.exe, the number is 558909. Am I doing a mistake (counting twice) or is it the real number ? regards, jean-roc http://www.qgis.org/cgi-bin/awstats.pl?urlfilter=/downloads/QGIS-OSGeo4W-1.8.0-.*-Setup.exeurlfilterex=output=urldetailconfig=qgisframename=mainrightmonth=allyear=2012 http://www.qgis.org/cgi-bin/awstats.pl?urlfilter=/downloads/QGIS-OSGeo4W-1.8.0-.*-Setup.exeurlfilterex=output=urldetailconfig=qgisframename=mainrightmonth=allyear=2013 ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Download stats : 558909 ?
I know about these details but I've seen the qgis' moon releases rise and fall into oblivion and I'm still amazed by the amount of progress of this software. So 558909 ? Just Awesome. :) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Download stats : 558909 ?
Yeah I know the difference, if everybody was doing like me you ahve to multiply by x50 ^^ Is there a possibility to have a map of these downloads ? Le 07/06/2013 20:06, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 07/06/2013 19:47, Alex Mandel ha scritto: It's a real number, not necessarily real people (some may be bots). Also not necessarily unique. I've read that awstats tends to overestimate up to 10%. Its also On the other hand, many organizations download just one copy, and distribute it within their network. I think a guesstimate of around one million users is not too far from reality. Of course, trends are probably mor informative than actual numbers. All the best. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Lidar in sextante
Paolo, You're mistaking liblas with laslib laslib/lastools : - https://cs.unc.edu/~isenburg/lastools/ - only dev is Martin Isenburg - the part for conversion, export, etc. are under LGPD, the rest is proprietary liblas : - www.liblas.org - main dev is Howard Butler - everything is BSD Please read http://www.liblas.org/lastools.html PLAS is based on the second and dev by Howard Le 23/05/2013 11:31, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. What about including http://www.pointcloud.org/ in sextante? Apparently its development is going faster than liblas, which unfortunately is mostly proprietary. All the best. - -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlGd4eUACgkQ/NedwLUzIr4SSQCeMG0IIFaOHOX7/AJkT+YbfhTm Gs4AoJO8kF2gXR8Fn+Hqa0+osOAdpyOI =eVMN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Git help needed
Hi, Could a git expert tell me how to clean my repo ? The situation : my fork origin/master is synced with upstream/master but if I do a pull request, some old commits are taken into account even if they aren't relevant. The desired solution : wipe all my local history and get a pure copy of upstream as if I just forked, without deleting my actual github fork. Regards, Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Git help needed
Hi Werner, Thank for the answer, I already tried git reset but got stuck on that : $ git reset --hard upstream/master fatal: ambiguous argument 'upstream/master': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this: 'git command [revision...] -- [file...]' But applying the command 'git remote update' before it did the trick ! I didn't knew this command, should it be used instead of fetch/pull upstream ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Git help needed
thx for these tips nathan ! Le 02/05/2013 11:30, Nathan Woodrow a écrit : Generally you should work and push branches to github and issue pull requests on those. It will make it easier to keep your pending commits and changes out of your master branch so you can update it like normal git checkout -b mywork do you stuff.. git commit -m My changes git push origin mywork Pull request on mywork branch. You can then keep master in line by doing: git checkout master git pull --rebase upstream/master upstream == QGIS github repo, might be different for you. - Nathan On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:03 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc jr.morre...@enoreth.net mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote: Hi Werner, Thank for the answer, I already tried git reset but got stuck on that : $ git reset --hard upstream/master fatal: ambiguous argument 'upstream/master': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this: 'git command [revision...] -- [file...]' But applying the command 'git remote update' before it did the trick ! I didn't knew this command, should it be used instead of fetch/pull upstream ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Logo Update
Not #338 because the curved tail, the grided globe + the hands are not usable for small icons (taskbar, favicon, etc.). I'm rooting for #50/#308. Maybe should we ask for a 16x16 version ? Le 01/05/2013 06:29, Mathieu Pellerin a écrit : New logos withdrawn. My 2 cents: I feel like design #50 is overly generic. Simply logos are good, but wondering whether this one went on the road of simplification to the extreme, leaving a logo with a *slight* gap in meaningfulness. There could be ways to remedy to that while keeping overall design intact. Maybe by having some sort of faux-3d on the green triangle using gradients to make it more like an arrow. #338 has much more identify, both hinting at GIS and cooperativeness of open source project. The color palette could be improved (maybe dark gray or black for text, and a tango color scheme based colors for hands?), as well as making GIS a bit smaller, moving up, and allow space for 'desktop, android, etc.'. Math On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com mailto:madman...@gmail.com wrote: New logos have been submitted from Larry. Feedback? - Nathan On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:33 AM, skampus stefano.cam...@regione.piemonte.it mailto:stefano.cam...@regione.piemonte.it wrote: if i can say my opinion, my preference go to #338 s. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Logo-Update-tp5050419p5050555.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] [Qgis-psc] Logo
Andyzendy (#50) for me : simple, easily downscalable to 16x16 (great for taskbar/favicon), can be converted to greyscale (good for print) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] What will be in QGIS 2.0
Le 11/07/2012 17:37, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il 11/07/2012 16:59, Germán Carrillo ha scritto: Since there could be too many new functionalities, what about publishing a survey in qgis.org http://qgis.org for prioritizing and, perhaps, postponing them for minor 2.x releases? once the list of possible features and tasks will be settled, I agree that a poll might be useful, if we have the resources to implement what comes out. All the best. I wonder if a poll is of any use, the people voting will be a small minority of the userbase and most of them will have no idea of how much work a feature needs. The filtering should be based on a simple question : is there a dev able to deliver this feature in time ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Releasing 1.8
Hi Etienne, A review of the french file is always appreciated, please use my fork https://github.com/Jean-Roc/Quantum-GIS Le 01/06/2012 20:39, Etienne Tourigny a écrit : Speaking of which... does anybody need help in the french and portuguese (Brazilian, 3rd language...) translations? Etienne On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Werner Machowerner.ma...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! It's just the translators would need a bit more time to finish the translations .. There were already some translations but I think we should at least give them a week to work on .. So please let's wait a few days more .. kind regards Werner -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/JCR0ACgkQDAH1YiCxBgnXTwCaAgygDsfH0aNErD2SQbPEJHh4 tbsAn0EagGmwZSMP6Rh23+3SkDoXGNEX =ReZn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] --configpath unactive on QGIS master
Hi, A ticket is open (#5544), this problem can be reproduced on Windows XP, Windows 7 and Fedora 17 with qgis-dev from OSGeo4W and git master. As it is making difficult to package qgis or use it on a USB device, should I set the affected version to 1.8 and/or raise its priority status ? regards, jean-roc http://hub.qgis.org/issues/5544 Le 23/04/2012 14:18, jr.morre...@enoreth.net a écrit : Hi, I would like to know if anybody here is using the configpath option on Windows 7 with qgis-master (rv991c7ba for me) to confirm the following behaviour so I can open a ticket. We package QGIS with many default parameters to ease the deploying, one of the modifications is the location of ~/.qgis : C:\OSGeo4W\bin\qgis-dev.bat --configpath D:\SIG\qgis\ If I install a new plugin, it gets correctly downloaded in to D:\SIG\qgis\python\plugins but when QGIS tries to load it it doesn't find it as it is looking everywhere for ./python except the configpath. Can't load plugin 'sextante' from ['C:/OSGeo4W/apps/qgis-dev/./python', 'C:\Users\morreale jean roc/.qgis/python', 'C:\Users\morreale jean roc/.qgis/python/plugins', 'C:/OSGeo4W/apps/qgis-dev/./python/plugins', 'C:\OSGeo4W\bin\python27.zip', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27\DLLs', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27\lib', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27\lib\plat-win', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27\lib\lib-tk', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\qgis-dev\bin', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27\lib\site-packages', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\Python27\lib\site-packages\PIL', 'C:\OSGeo4W\apps\qgis-dev\python\plugins\fTools\tools'] Traceback (most recent call last): File C:/OSGeo4W/apps/qgis-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py, line 143, in loadPlugin __import__(packageName) File C:/OSGeo4W/apps/qgis-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py, line 309, in _import mod = _builtin_import(name, globals, locals, fromlist, level) ImportError: No module named sextante regards, jean-roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Add a simpler default setting for a fresh installation
Hi, Would it be possible to change the default parameters of QGIS ? For now a new user gets all the tool bars on the first launch and most of the tools are not visible. Some such as advanced digitizing, grass, overview should be off by default. The others should be spread out, for example the navigation bar could be set on one side of the application. Somme other changes could be : - to activate the north icon and the scale bar for the canevas - to add a default 10 pixel radius for snapping tolerance and vertex edit - activate show makers only for selected features - switch to zoom to mouse cursor to have the same behavior than most of the web-mapping tools These changes would make the software less frightening, less cluttered for newcomers. Regards, MORREALE Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Add a simpler default setting for a fresh installation
In my experience, new users are quite fond of having them : - the north, so then they realize that their data isn't projected correctly - the graphic scale, because they can't figure a number but can relate to a line (and use their thumb to compare (not a joke)) Le 16/04/2012 11:11, Andreas Neumann a écrit : Hi, I agree with all of your ideas, except for adding the north icon and the scalebar by default. The map always points north in QGIS, so why the arrow? Also, the map scale is already in the status bar, so why the double information? All other suggestions make sense to me. I would also add the following default settings: Tab Map Tools: - mode: Top down, stop at first hit - checkbox enabled for open object form if only a single result ... Andreas On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:05:01 +0200, MORREALE Jean Roc wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to change the default parameters of QGIS ? For now a new user gets all the tool bars on the first launch and most of the tools are not visible. Some such as advanced digitizing, grass, overview should be off by default. The others should be spread out, for example the navigation bar could be set on one side of the application. Somme other changes could be : - to activate the north icon and the scale bar for the canevas - to add a default 10 pixel radius for snapping tolerance and vertex edit - activate show makers only for selected features - switch to zoom to mouse cursor to have the same behavior than most of the web-mapping tools These changes would make the software less frightening, less cluttered for newcomers. Regards, MORREALE Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] [hackfest] documentation tasks
Le 30/03/2012 14:46, Yves Jacolin a écrit : Hello, For the hackfest, any plans to work on the documentation? We don't need to translate so I am wondering if there are other tasks that we (francophone community) could work on. Jean-Roc, Otto, Vincent, others: any idea? I would like to think a little bit about this before the hackfest as I have several question about this. Thanks, Y. I saw Paolo Corti talking about rst on the list last week, I've Salvatore Larosa's work on rst for the dev-cookbook, etc. Is there a possibility of finally making a step, even if it's one I don't like, adn start converting latex to rst ? If not I'll work on the ui, the help file, etc. as I've not been able to work on these last month. For the french contributors, a taskforce called no plugin left untranslated could be created :) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] RE: ECW!!!
GDAL can use ecw's sdk 3.3 or 4, the standalone qgis version is built against 3.3 which is an outdated piece of junk but is under a licence that allows some kind of redistribution. On the other side you've the free 4.x sdk which works better but is a really pain to get and joined by an even more painful license. Or you can buy it. And then you also have to take in account that if you use their binaries then you are not even garanted that your Windows desktops will accept them without throwing up because of some dll/mvc++ mismatch. My advice would be to ask the IGN to provide you the TIFF and then adapt them to your taste, that's what we are doing here. Le 22/03/2012 20:55, Fred ETHEVE a écrit : Hi all, Big, big problem in France with ECW! A lot of my students work with QGIS, and French IGN give rasters in ECW formats Exists a solution to use ECW? Compiling gdal??? Regards, Fred ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012
Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit : Hi On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi giovanni.man...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release? Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different? if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;) I thought you might say that! Are their any heavily trademarked products called Lisbon out there in the GIS space? Maybe better would be to use the local neighbourhood of the university? Regards Tim There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related - http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/ And there is some nice historical map which would be great (moons are gone, old maps are the new trend) - http://historic-cities.huji.ac.il/portugal/lisbon/maps/braun_hogenberg_I_1_1_b.jpg ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Lyon Hackfest : Register !
Hi, I would to remind everyone that it is possible to register for the QGIS Hackfest in Lyon (April 12th-16th 2012) - http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/7_QGIS_Developer_Meeting_in_Lyon_2012 Doing so will help the organizers. Regards, Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Add QScintilla2 PyQt module to QGIS Distributions?
Le 10/02/2012 20:34, Tim Sutton a écrit : - ship with a ready to roll sphinx project Not a *.ts ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Slow raster loading
Le 09/02/2012 10:38, Nathan Woodrow a écrit : I had a person email me today (a council trying to me to QGIS) about trying to load a 2gb ecw and it just locks up the UI with no idea of how much is left to be done or what is going on. I have experienced the same thing but managed to get around it by making a fake stats file, QGIS then just opens thinking the stats are fine. Oh I'm often getting a similar kind of report : the user opens the properties, clicks on the wrong tab - too bad the file is a huge pct raster, kill your project. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Criticism of lack of symbols in QGIS
Hi, at the moment I don't think it woulb be wise to include that much symbols without changing the way they are presented to user. They have to be sorted in categories and never loaded all at once. Le 05/02/2012 00:07, Mayeul Kauffmann a écrit : Hi, This discussion came up already, but just in case this was forgotten: I generated a set of about 1000 svg color icons for QGIS, based on OSM icons. Available here as public domain: http://www.mediafire.com/?jiooxkbmyzgr0 Sample use visible in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBBYtH2svw0t=3m26s (Customizing OSM map with osm2postgresql QGIS ) Hope this helps, Mayeul Le vendredi 03 février 2012 à 23:46 -0800, Alex Mandel a écrit : On 02/03/2012 09:39 PM, Tyler Mitchell wrote: FYI, I +others converted over 100 icons from pdf/font to svg in a 2 hour sprint a few months back. We should add something to pull them into QGIS source for inclusion. Only hold up was that I couldn't get the svg fill stuff worked out. Very cool - are these icons the ones that you can access already via the style manager SVG options? No these icons are converted from public domain US government sets, as of Oct 2011. They have not been incorporated into QGIS yet, but will be shortly. After talking with Nathan and Gary I think we can find a way to pull a copy from the osgeo svn every once in a while, say when building a new release, so maybe they'll be in QGIS 1.7.4 Alternately maybe a plugin should be made to pull them in as an optional thing. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] HackFest in Lyon
Hi everyone, We are (osgeo-fr) working on getting a place for a maximum of fifty persons. What we know so far - Month : April Days : 3 to 5, will include Friday, Saturday and Sunday Poll : http://www.doodle.com/cw5ggzfv645fbept Regards, Jean-Roc Le 20/01/2012 14:49, Werner Macho a écrit : Hi! About 30min ago I asked Horst the same on IRC ... +1 to start early to have enough time to catch cheap flights .. regards Werner On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 14:21 +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote: Hi all. Should we start planning for the next HF? Any blocker? What are the preferred dates? And, any news from our local organizers? All the best. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] HackFest in Lyon
Le 20/01/2012 18:28, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il 20/01/2012 15:20, Yves Jacolin ha scritto: We create a wiki page (in French) for organization: see http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Hackfest_qgis_2012 For consistency, please use this page: http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/7_QGIS_Developer_Meeting_in_Lyon_2012 Merci. Done. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] What is the C++ Plugin writing Workflow?
Le 28/12/2011 12:07, arunthe...@gmail.com a écrit : Hello Devs, In connection with the previous announcement that, I am planning to build the Heatmap plugin and people suggesting that I use C++ for it so that it gets native support, I have a few doubts regarding this. Firstly what exactly is the workflow? My rudimentary understanding is that, C++ plugins are shipped with the software. So I need to create a folder for my plugin inside the Quantum-GIS/src/plugins/ folder and write my code inside that folder, and compile the entire Quantum-GIS for errors. I think I am wrong, because, one cannot compile the entire codebase just to verify errors in 5 or 6 files. So how exactly is it done? I have been hunting around the web and the hub.qgis for this info, for about 2 days. Most docs talk about the Qgis 0.8 era development only. http://linfiniti.com/2011/02/speeding-up-qgis-compilation-times-with-ccache/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Where to put plugins and documents ?
Le 15/12/2011 17:20, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il 15/12/2011 16:28, Alexander Bruy ha scritto: Is there a recommendation to share the sources (such as http://hub.qgis.org/projects/plugin-builder)? To share plugin sources you can use any SCM service such as GitHub, BitBucket, Google Code etc, or even setup own repo. AFAIK there are no strict recomendations on this. IMHO it would be prefab to have a default location (git instance) for all plugins, otherwise we'll end up quickly with a mess, especially considering the number of plugins and plugin developers is quickly increasing, and many of them will be possibly broken during the move to 2.0 APIs. All the best. Good evening everyone, As this code includes french comments and a french-only UI, I'm proposing to host the code on my github repo to translate it. Once it is done any person interested could fork it and take the maintainership. The two plugins are : - a MapInfo's .wor importation tool, quite advanced - a fork of the Select plugin which is core since a few release, this one brings feature like revert selection Thanks Alain for sharing these tools ! Jean-Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] RE: New QGIS logo
Le 27/11/2011 08:12, Tyler Mitchell a écrit : On 2011-11-26, at 10:32 PM, Micha Silver wrote: On 27/11/2011 04:55, Alister Hood wrote: I always thought it was one of the best icons and logos I'd ever seen. Glad I'm not the only one who likes it ;) +1 (three so far?) I assumed it was all debated somewhere else, so didn't want to speak up. :) I was surprised to see it discussed and wonder who makes the decision that it should be changed in the first place. I'm not opposed to variations but any major shift would be worth discussing with broader community (forgive me if it has been!). I hate changing major brand look/feel of applications very often... so that's just me ;-) My 2 cents only, Tyler No one decided and no a single person will, I made a proposal 3 months ago, talks have been going on, several persons want to set up an art contest where users can vote. You can hardly make a more democratic move. And about the frequency of changes, I can't recall the last time QGIS changed its logo. Change isn't bad or else osgeo.org would not be changing its website. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] New QGIS logo
The actual logo is very difficult to read at small size (32x32 and 16x16) because of the font used and all the details (gradient, shadow, arrow). The SVG source file is a mess (non-blending parts, incoherent shadow) and not scalable. And I would add that integrating the logo into a modern-looking publication makes people die somewhere, I'm pretty sure that's a fact. Le 26/11/2011 21:32, Mars Sjoden a écrit : I am just wondering what is wrong with the current QGIS icon/symbol? Are there some complaints about it's design? It currently seems simple, scalable, representative, and recognizable amongst those who currently are using QGIS. signed, Devil's Advocate ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QIGS GPL - LGPL - Tigers, Lions and Bears Oh My!
Le 17/11/2011 23:19, Alister Hood a écrit : Sorry, Just to clarify, when I said dual licensing I obviously meant with a commercial license, not with LGPL. The use of commercial is not appropriate as the GPL also qualifies for it. Let's call it what it really is : closed. -Original Message- From: Alister Hood Sent: Friday, 18 November 2011 11:17 a.m. To: 'qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org' Cc: 'jr.morre...@enoreth.net' Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] QIGS GPL - LGPL - Tigers, Lions and Bears Oh My! The idea of dual licensing is that they would pay up front to use QGIS under a commercial license. So it _would_ bring a positive return to the project (a new source of revenue). No need to hope to be repaid someday. Who will then sell the license ? The osgeo ? A new QGIS foundation ? Is that their roles ? I still can't see how selling closed software or helping a company get an advantage over one who will not take its client as hostages is promoting the open source gis idea. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Help translating Qgis documentation into french
Hi Fred, thanks for the proposal but the work on the 1.7 manual is over, I'm just waiting for the new git repo to be set up. However if the release plan works out, a new translation's campaign will begin by the end of december. Le 16/11/2011 19:24, Fred ETHEVE a écrit : Hi, Jean-Roc, May i help you for translating Qgis documentation into french? Regards Fred -Message d'origine- De : qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] De la part de MORREALE Jean Roc Envoyé : dimanche 13 novembre 2011 16:12 À : qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Objet : Re: [Qgis-developer] Help translating Qgis documentation into french Regarding RST, has any decision been made at the hackfest ? Le 13/11/2011 15:24, yjaco...@free.fr a écrit : Hello Kimaidou, I am curently finishing one of the last file. See http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Doc_qgis_fr for a list of files. I need to check the foreword chapter as Christophe tell me on Francophone ML that he didn't finish it. You can check it will help surely. After the next release (1.8) of the documentation there will be a big work to migrate documentation to RST. Help will be welcome. Y. - Mail original - De: kimaidoukimai...@gmail.com À: qgis-developerqgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Envoyé: Dimanche 13 Novembre 2011 14:38:55 Objet: [Qgis-developer] Help translating Qgis documentation into french Hi devs, I would like to contribute to Qgis documentation in French. I invite people already involved in the french translation to answer this email if there is some space for another volunteer... Regards Kimaidou ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Help translating Qgis documentation into french
Regarding RST, has any decision been made at the hackfest ? Le 13/11/2011 15:24, yjaco...@free.fr a écrit : Hello Kimaidou, I am curently finishing one of the last file. See http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Doc_qgis_fr for a list of files. I need to check the foreword chapter as Christophe tell me on Francophone ML that he didn't finish it. You can check it will help surely. After the next release (1.8) of the documentation there will be a big work to migrate documentation to RST. Help will be welcome. Y. - Mail original - De: kimaidoukimai...@gmail.com À: qgis-developerqgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org Envoyé: Dimanche 13 Novembre 2011 14:38:55 Objet: [Qgis-developer] Help translating Qgis documentation into french Hi devs, I would like to contribute to Qgis documentation in French. I invite people already involved in the french translation to answer this email if there is some space for another volunteer... Regards Kimaidou ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] 1.7.1 Branch created
Hi Tim, Could you backport the following fix to ? https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/commit/d5594b09e050412d92ae6916e2141975a993a262 Le 19/09/2011 00:28, Tim Sutton a écrit : Hi Just to update those waiting for 1.7.1, I was hoping to put it out this weekend but got delayed with bug hunting on the backported raster stuff. I'll hopefully get it out during the course of this week. Keep applying non destabilising backports fixes in the mean time if you have them. Regards Tim On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Tim Suttonli...@linfiniti.com wrote: Hi On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Ivan Mincikivan.min...@gista.sk wrote: It would be great if folks would test it compiles on their platform and generally behaves ok. I have configured our Pbuilder for daily builds for Debian Squeeze. Until now it builds fine. Great to hear! Thanks Ivan! Regards Tim ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] map canvas does not update according to layers switched on
Le 19/09/2011 19:24, Giovanni Manghi a écrit : With current trunk, I am finding that the canvas is not updated at the first switching on/off of a layer on the legend: anyone confirms? Not here, I'm on Ubuntu/trunk. Confirmed on Windows with qgis-dev from osgeo4w ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] 1.7.1 Branch created
Le 11/09/2011 21:19, Tim Sutton a écrit : Hi On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote: Le 08/09/2011 00:14, Tim Sutton a écrit : Hi Folks I have created a branch for 1.7.1. git branch --track release-1_7_1 origin/release-1_7_1 Origin being the main git repo. It would be great if folks would test it compiles on their platform and generally behaves ok. I have a few more things to change before we tag it for the 1.7.1 release. Please consider the old 1_7_0 branch permanently frozen and apply any backports to the 1.7.1 branch. After the release, I will immediately branch 1.7.2 so that it is a bit more obvious which branch should be on the receiving end of your backports. Best regards Hi Tim, Could you tell me how to correctly add this branch to my local repo ? I've been trying checkout/fetch/pull release-1_7_1 from origin or upstream but it always gets ugly when merging. git branch --track release-1_7_1 origin/release-1_7_1 Above should do it for you then after that: git checkout release-1_7_1 git pull origin release-1_7_1 The changes I would like to make are already in master but as I didn't use properly the BACKPORT tag they're not in this branch, one could be directly merged from master (doc/TRANSLATORS). If you can identify the commit id of your original commit, you can simply use cherry-pick to apply it (while inside the release branch): git cherry-pickhash Then push it up to the release branch: git push origin release-1_7_1 Hope that helps! Regards Tim it worked, thanks :) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] 1.7.1 Branch created
Le 08/09/2011 00:14, Tim Sutton a écrit : Hi Folks I have created a branch for 1.7.1. git branch --track release-1_7_1 origin/release-1_7_1 Origin being the main git repo. It would be great if folks would test it compiles on their platform and generally behaves ok. I have a few more things to change before we tag it for the 1.7.1 release. Please consider the old 1_7_0 branch permanently frozen and apply any backports to the 1.7.1 branch. After the release, I will immediately branch 1.7.2 so that it is a bit more obvious which branch should be on the receiving end of your backports. Best regards Hi Tim, Could you tell me how to correctly add this branch to my local repo ? I've been trying checkout/fetch/pull release-1_7_1 from origin or upstream but it always gets ugly when merging. The changes I would like to make are already in master but as I didn't use properly the BACKPORT tag they're not in this branch, one could be directly merged from master (doc/TRANSLATORS). Regards, Jean Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] New QGIS logo
As it seems to be the choice of the majority, let's do it the right way : so Simon, please set up this contest by the beginning of the next week so this matter is settled before the next hackfest (nobody wants a shirt with a deprecated logo). Le 01/09/2011 14:27, Simon O'Keefe a écrit : As Nathan has mentioned, Groundtruth is offering to sponsor a logo competition for QGIS. We're willing to chip in a couple of hundred bucks. If others are willing to chip in too, we'll likely get better quality submissions. We've had success with running a competition to come up with a logo for a product of ours: http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/logo-required-geospatial-software-application-38125 We'd love to see QGIS branded with a professional logo that does justice to the massive effort that's been poured into this project, and one that my company can be confident to present to our clients as a compelling alternative to their proprietary GIS software. Sure, looks aren't everything, and the QGIS developer community has been busy working on other more important issues. But now that we find QGIS well and truly on the main stage, let's dress it up a bit. Groundtruth is happy to take a back seat in this and let others decide the specs and voting. Cheers -- Simon O'Keefe Groundtruth Melbourne, Australia ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-psc] QGIS forum
So if the decision is the status-quo : - let's make easy to join it I've suscribed to the forum today and it was painfull as the registration code is extremely difficult to read (I took me 10 attempt and the anti bot question hard to reply when you don't have an english mindset (I replied 3 instead of third...it tooks me while to figure it out) - let's make it clear that for the dev part, the dev-ML is better suited so we don't let potential contributors without reply for months On the fr version of the website, I'll add two external links pointing to active french-speaking boards. Le 17/07/2011 03:08, Gary Sherman a écrit : I am back from 11 days off the grid. I have always viewed the forum as a viable support mechanism. My comment about addressing the issue was not agreement or disagreement with any proposed solutions, but related solely to the need to decommission the current server. I think shutting down the forum will be a potential shock to many users and will no doubt have negative impacts. Forums are a pain because of bots and spam, however we have a large number of users that rely on the QGIS forum for support and information. Maybe gis.stackexchange.org can replace the forum---or maybe not. Either way there are two things that are certain: 1 - the current server will be offline prior to August 10, 2011 2 - there will by many unhappy users if the forum goes away The community and psc need to decide if we are willing to accept #2... ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Cleaning the commercail support's list
Hi, The compagny Figure8 Information Studio is listed on the commercial support's page of the website, however when you follow the link you get to Social-IT-e Media with no informations related to QGIS (or GIS in general). If there is no complains, I'll delete it in the next days. Other websites waiting for the axe to fall : http://www.webmapper.nl/ - it's a reserved parking lot, not a website http://www.hugis.net/ - does it still have a use Marco ? Regards, Jean Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Cleaning the commercail support's list
Le 15/07/2011 16:18, Marco Hugentobler a écrit : Hi Jean Roc http://www.hugis.net/ - does it still have a use Marco ? It is already removed from the english and german pages. Please remove it from the french one too. correction done ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS mobile GSoC 2011 weekly report #6
Le 11/07/2011 00:07, Tim Sutton a écrit : Just another comment - I wasnt objecting the vertical scrollbars per se (we added them to most dialogs in Wroclaw) and I think it is good to make the layer props consistent with the rest. Hi, I'll just react to this point : the previous vertical scrolling for the properties or the general options was screwed (no enough space for text leading to an i18n mess) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] forum.qgis.org
Le 27/06/2011 19:16, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il 27/06/2011 19:03, Nick Hopton ha scritto: There might be unwanted consequences if this were to happen. The forum has evolved into a friendly first port of call for newcomers with problems and I think that some new users might find the mailing-list intimidating (I'm taking here about, say, a lad who might have installed QGIS yesterday and now finds that his GPS tracks won't fit properly on his map). At present we have the forum, which I think does a good job for newcomers; the mailing-list, which is pitched more towards those with greater experience; and we have the developer list, which is where the world-class experts live. I had reports of people disappointed from not having a response through the forum (I understand few devs and power users hang out there). If true, this would not be a positive thing for qgis. What are from your point of view the differences between a ML and a forum? All the best. +9000 For example, a person willing to work on SVG but with no return from a dev : http://forum.qgis.org/viewtopic.php?f=5t=8773 It would be more honest to redirect to the list rather than keeping an unloved forum. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] forum.qgis.org
In the french-speaking community there is two big forums where users come to get support for qgis, they are better referenced than our forum on google so it is often their first stop. I'm sure that there must be an equivalent place for english speakers, if so it would better to redirect non-ML people to these forums rather than keeping our own with a lower reply rate. Le 27/06/2011 21:16, Carson J Q Farmer a écrit : I think we have to be careful here, there are a lot of users out there who don't use mailing lists as a general rule. Mailing lists tend to be a bit more of a 'commitment' than forums, and I think we'd be alienating a lot of users if we drop the forums completely... Is there anyway to set it up so that forum questions are routed to the mailing list, while still appearing to be within the forums for those that prefer this? A new forum structure would probably be fine/nice, but mailing lists tend to be quite 'developer-centric'... I prefer mailing lists myself... But many of my students are 'afraid' or weary of them... On the other hand, the mailing list format works well for the R project... Just some thoughts to throw around before we completely abandon the forums... And possibly some users... Carson -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth www.carsonfarmer.com On 27 Jun 2011, at 05:36 p.m., Anita Graseranitagra...@gmx.at wrote: +1 from your forum mod ;) Anything that reduces complexity in our web infrastructure is a plus. The forums attract a lot of spam (= work cleaning up) and I feel like there's a much bigger audience following the mailing list anyway. Best wishes, Anita On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Pirmin Kalbererpi...@sourcepole.com wrote: Hi all, Some time ago it was mentioned that forum.qgis.org should be replaced. Why not simply redirect to http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/qgis-user-f2036571.html ? Regards Pirmin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] MeteoIO
Hi, Following a news on qgis 1.7.0, Mathias Bavay asked if we would be interested by a C++/LGPL lib they're are working on : https://slfsmm.indefero.net/p/meteoio/ The MeteoIO library aims at making data access easy and safe for numerical simulations in environmental sciences requiring general meteorological data. I've asked him to join the list as it would be a nice addition to the growing geoprocessing framework :) Regards, Jean Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing the release of QGIS 1.7 'Wrocław'
Le 19/06/2011 11:20, Tim Sutton a écrit : We are very pleased to announce the release of QGIS 1.7.0, the next in our development release series. Hurray ! Congratulations to all ! Tim I'll update the banner and the screenshots page ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Announcing the release of QGIS 1.7 'Wrocław'
Is there you have any updated download numbers available for qgis 1.6 ? I'm writing a french article about qgis 1.7 and it is always good to boast a little about our gigormous userbase :) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS Mobile [GSoC 2011]
Le 25/05/2011 17:22, Marco Bernasocchi a écrit : Hi All, I'm Marco Bernasocchi from Switzerland, I'll be porting QuantumGIS to Android over the next 12 weeks, in these first days (beside preparing the final presentation of my Master thesis) I started looking into which libraries need to be ported and in getting all the android QT environment up and running. I created a Wiki page [0] and a github repository [1] for the project, furthermore I'll blog about my findings on [2]. Good dev to all Ciao Marco [0] http://www.qgis.org/wiki/QGIS_Mobile_GSoC_2011 [1] https://github.com/mbernasocchi/qgis-mobile [2] http://www.bernawebdesign.ch/byteblog/category/programming/gsoc2011/ http://www.opengis.ch Do you intend to use actual *.ui files or switch to QML ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5
Forget about an improved svg output with the actual QtSvg - QtSvg Overall module state: Deprecated New maintainer required Reasoning: SVG Full (as opposed to SVG Tiny) functionality available in QtWebKit, which should be used instead; we welcome research for a replacement for the SVG-generating code. ref. http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/05/12/qt-modules-maturity-level-the-list/ Le 09/05/2011 19:33, Martin Dobias a écrit : Hi all for those interested in the future of Qt framework, there's a post on Qt Labs blog with thoughts about the next major release: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/05/09/thoughts-about-qt-5/ Very interesting reading. It is time to learn QML and some more JavaScript :-) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qt5
Le 12/05/2011 19:12, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.08 +0200, MORREALE Jean Roc ha scritto: Forget about an improved svg output with the actual QtSvg - So better drop it altogether? All the best. He points to QtWebkit which have a full SVG implementation instead of the QtSvg's SVG Tiny ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Git repo available for testing
Le 07/05/2011 18:31, William Kyngesburye a écrit : Is this git thing on? Questions and confusion. Is there a git guide for dummies? I found http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Using_Git but it seems overly complex. I just want to do like I've done with svn - check out/update, make changes, and commit the changes. 3 steps. Git checkout itself looks complex, let alone committing a change. ...Sorry if I seem a bit resistant. Have a look at the help - http://help.github.com/ Here is a nice cheatsheet - http://ktown.kde.org/~zrusin/git/git-cheat-sheet-medium.png Are users migrated to git? Or do I need to register with github and ask for commit access? You need to register to github but you don't need to ask for commit access : the best way of enjoying git is to make your own fork the trunk, work on it and then push the changes back. It is still possible to have one repo with everybody writing directly to it but, Tim will correct me, that's not the choice made at the hackfest. How long until 1.7 release? I would like to do the workaround for http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3497 before release, and check over the Mac install/build instructions. On May 2, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Tim Sutton wrote: If you are interested in the git migration, you can test and play around with it here: http://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS You can go ahead and fork it and see if everything works ok for you. If we encounter any major issues, we may need to trash and repopulate it so please don't consider it production ready yet. I made detailed notes on the migration for anyone interested here: http://linfiniti.com/2011/05/some-notes-on-the-great-migration-qgis-svn-to-git/ If any git experts notice anything untoward with my procedures please feel free to suggest better working practices. I'll give it a couple of days and if nobody has any major issues, we can start to use that as our canonical repository. Next we will start to work on the trac - redmine migration (and svn commitlog - git commitlog in redmine). If anyone has particular expertise in these (especially the latter), please feel free to volunteer your services. The other directories (code examples etc under svn trunk) I will migrate after the release has gone out. Regards Tim -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) == Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming and support services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer - William Kyngesburyekyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com http://www.kyngchaos.com/ The beast is actively interested only in now, and, as it is always now and always shall be, there is an eternity of time for the accomplishment of objects. - the wisdom of Tarzan ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] GPL in the Tips (warning: license's bigotry inside)
Hi, I'm translating the Tips, this sentence caught my eye : The GPL places a restriction that any modifications you make must be made available to the Quantum GIS project This is misleading, you only have to share your modification if you distribute the binaries to somebody else. And even then you only have to give access to the source code to the receivers, you don't have to send your changes directly to the project. For example if an geographic institute called *** made a client based on QGIS supporting its in-house DRM access protocol, it would only have to make the code available when distributing this version outside of the institute. Regards, Jean Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] SpatiaLite very slow with QGIS 1.7
Le 17/03/2011 17:04, Alessandro Furieri a écrit : Hi Noli, hi Royce, I've just spent several hours attempting to build the current QGIS-Trunk SVN snapshot on my cheap and old second hand MacMini (incredibly slow hardware, really an extenuating time consuming process ...). Anyway, these are my personal findings: - Mac Os X 10.5 Intel - not using frameworks at all (only the Qt one) - using MacPorts libraries instead - and using INTERNAL SpatiaLite (2.4.0-RC4) + QGIS on Mac Os X runs exactly as it run on Windows + I was completely unable to observe any issue about the Identify tool + opening an 80+ layers DB takes an absolutely reasonable time + closing the same DB is a quite immediate process So, I'm completely unable to tell you why the 'standard' QGIS distribution for Mac Os X shows so many problems related to SpatiaLite 2.4.0-RC4 as you've reported. At this point I strongly suspect that something is broken or misconfigured in the most recent SpatiaLite Mac Os X framework, because simply avoiding to use this one and building so to use the INTERNAL spatialite instead fixes any issue. bye Sandro Ticket #3002 may be linked, it is reproducible on windows/linux. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] SpatiaLite very slow with QGIS 1.7
Le 17/03/2011 19:47, a.furi...@lqt.it a écrit : On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:48:51 +0100, MORREALE Jean Roc wrote Ticket #3002 may be linked, it is reproducible on windows/linux. Hi Jean Roc, ticket #3002 isn't related at all to SpatiaLite and/or to the QGIS own SpatiaLite data provider. I've just attempted to save a (quite small sized) Shapefile as a SQLite DB following the procedure reported on ticket #3002. Yes, I can confirm, you are perfectly right: the export process is incredibly slow ( 10 minutes) and strongly inefficient (spatialite_gui performs the same identical task just in few seconds). Anyway, at the end of the process a basic SQLite DB was generated. Please note well: this is *not* at all a SpatiaLite own DB; this one is an OGR/FDO own DB (a completely different thing, using an independent code base). Sorry for the mistake, I didn't knew there was a difference in the ouput. So for sure this issue is entirely caused by OGR, and has absolutely nothing to do with SpatiaLite. Just as a working hypothesis: during this painful export I noticed a very low CPU activity, and an impressively huge disk traffic. This is exactly what I'm expecting from a badly implemented process attempting to perform lots and lots of SQL INSERTs without declaring a corresponding BEGIN and COMMIT ... and such a condition notoriously is a real performance killer for any transactional DBMS. my 2 cents :-) Can you confirm that it is due to OGR ? ogr2ogr with SPATIALITE=yes is faster than QGIS 'save as' ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: New Symbology : merge borders on nodes for lines
Le 17/02/2011 13:11, Robert Szczepanek a écrit : Hi Kimaidou, In style new symbology hit 'Symbol levels'. Enable it. That is it. regards, Robert Thanks for the information ! I've using symbol levels to change the display level of the categories of a layer but never thought that it was also meant to merge line decorations. Definitely worth of being added in the next manual :) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS and Google Summer of Code - ideas page on the wiki
Martin, I saw you cleaned the gsoc's page and changed the 3D proposal. While a globe visualization tool is great, the proposal I submitted was quite a different beast as it isn't limited to WGS84 surfaces but allows geological volumes, volumetric dynamic flow, 3d object boundaries, etc. Would it be possible to keep this proposal ? ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Grouping toolbar buttons
Le 27/01/2011 18:27, Alexander Bruy a écrit : Hi all I want to discuss one question about QGIS GUI. There are several toolbars with buttons in QGIS, some buttons have similar appointment. For example there are five buttons for adding layers and all this buttons needs space on toolbar. What do you think about replacing this buttons (and similar) with one button with dropdown menu [1] as we already see in Select, Measure and Annotation tools? This will save some extra space on toolbar. I think this can be done for add layer buttons in QGIS and export map buttons in Composer. Also may be for zoom buttons in QGIS [1] http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/4302/layermenubutton.png Thanks Only 4 icons should ideally be needed : - vector - raster - database - network I think it would more efficient to merge the different ui than hiding the complexity in a submenu which downgrade the discoverability of frequently used features. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Set default TIFF options for QGIS
Le 17/01/2011 07:48, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Would you like to open a ticket (or more) on this? Ticket opened : http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/3436 I think this really is one of these small features that would have a great impact on user experience of the software. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Full consistent SVG Icon Set
Le 13/10/2010 19:55, Robert Szczepanek a écrit : W dniu 13.10.2010 17:54, Alex Mandel pisze: On 10/13/2010 08:42 AM, Vincent Picavet wrote: Hi, (...) On a more general viewpoint, what users stated was that it would be really great to have some kind of a centralized icon and style repository, with automatic search and retrieval from inside QGis, a bit like what KDE does with KDE Hot New Stuff ( http://newstuff.kde.org/repos.php ). Are there any current plans on implementing this kind of feature ? Vincent There is a movement within the OSGeo community to centralize all the freely available icons. It's been a little slow to get started but see the Graphics mailing list http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/graphics These things tend to not take a ton of space so it's fairly likely that they would just be included in QGIS, no need to retrieve them from the web. That said I agree that some way to catalog (keyword) and search for icons could be quite useful, the big problem is where to stick that metadata within the svg files. Thanks, Alex Hi Vincent and Alex, You are absolutely right. It's already time to prepare map icons for QGIS and other applications. Upcoming hackfest in Wroclaw will be god time to discuss (complete? ;)) this task. Please send your proposals and ideas to this ML or OSGeo graphics ML. Just use word 'icon' in mail theme. regards, Robert Hi Robert, A few months ago, I started dispatching your icon set into individual svg files to get it like the default qgis set and to ease the work on it as separate packages means the possibility to follow the evolution of one icon in a svn repo. Unfortunatly I've not been able to achieve this port due to lack of time and some difficulty to browse the source file. I can upload what I've done somewhere if interested. I planned to do some work on your icon set to bring more contrast (it is difficult for some to distinguish between active and unactive). About the map icon sets, having them is one thing but for now it would be too painful to browse in the composer item tab without a filtering tool (the folder search doesn't fill this gap). Regards, Jean Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] documentation improvements
Hi, Please have a look to these pages - http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Working_with_Subversion_and_Latex http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Manual_Writing Le 04/10/2010 20:40, Henri De Feraudy a écrit : Hi, I'm going to have a bit of spare time to improve the English documentation QGis 1.5. I've noticed grammar mistakes, like for example The Delete Ring tool allows to delete ring polygons inside an existing area. This is not correct English as it should say who is allowed. So it should be The Delete Ring tool allows you to delete ring polygons inside an existing area. The document is written with a certain number of typographical conventions. If I want me to suggest improvements or a rewrite, what do you suggest I use as a file format, and as a writing tool? yours truly Henri ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] QGIS - French Ministry of Environment
Hi Andreas, I'm following trunk (svn junkie) so during this meeting I've shown up the label properties panel and it was appreciated but this is not the excepted functionnality. These annotations are text objects and do not derivate from an attribute, the user can manualy modify their font size, their oritentation, etc. It is a feature available in MapInfo (ArcGIS too) and users are expecting it. This isn't the best way to label a map but even with the huge improvements brough by PAL/labelv2 (even if it isn't ready to replace the old yet), manual editing is often required to get a correct output. The development done by the MEEDDM was a way for some technical persons to get their hands into the PyQGIS API and a mean to know how easy it would be to make these changes. They want a deskop GIS that can evolve and can be modified, both things MapInfo isn't. Further works will be coordinated with the community as there is a real will to mutualize the work. If everything goes well, you will soon see new names on this list. For notice, at first they estimated the time needed for first OpenWOR version to 30 days, it turned out that 7 days were enough... Regards, Jean Roc Le 26/09/2010 22:15, Andreas Neumann a écrit : Hi Jean, Thank you for this interesting information. I understand that the decision is still pending but that there is a positive attitude towards QGIS. As far as labeling/annotation features, there had been recent improvements in the trunk. And there will be more. This work is funded from the cities of Uster and Thun in Switzerland. The recent improvements are around data-defined text properties (font-family, size, color, rotation, offsets (vertical and horizontal), etc) - basically porting the old data-defined settings to the new label engine. Marco will also soon start work on manual label placement with the option of having different anchor points (aligned with the Swiss Interlis text placement). This would potentially also be useful for MEEDDM. Are you aware that annotations also exist in newer QGIS versions? This was funded by the Kanton of Solothurn. I don't know if the current annotations satisfy your needs, but it is worth exploring. The annotations as they are implemented currently are stored in the project file, not in a separate layer. You probably want the annotation layer type - but I think that this will be covered by the work mentioned in the paragraph above. Please let us know your requirements regarding labeling/annotation - Marco is currently working on them, and maybe your requirements could be taken care of at the same time. The Swiss QGIS users are coordinating QGIS development and sharing the funding efforts as well. We collaborate with the companies Sourcepole (Marco Hugentobler, Pirmin Kalberer) and Norbit (Jürgen Fischer). If you are interested, we can also do more international collaboration/coordination. Of course a lot of issues could be discussed on the mailinglists, but there could be meetings as well, maybe also at an upcoming Hackfest, or separate. In my opinion, new features can be included quite fast into QGIS, if funding/financing can be organized. Often faster than with commercial software. Some coordination should be done to avoid double or triple efforts (same feature developed several times by different parties) and to maximize the benefits from the financial contributions. Please keep us informed about the upcoming decision/plans of MEEDDM. Andreas On 9/26/10 2:27 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc wrote: Hi, here is a very short resume of a QGIS party that was organized a few days ago by the French Ministry of Environment (MEEDDM [1]) to exchange informations on Quantum GIS, in order to determine the possibility of its use as one of their GIS desktop tools. Most of the participants were technical members of the ministry and its local branches, and Vincent Picavet (OSGEO-fr treasurer) and I (OSGEO-fr/QGIS). QGIS is being used internally for months by some of their agents or departments in parallel with the actual official tool, which is MapInfo. The ministry is ongoing a rationalization of their actual software base, leading to the adoption of web gis and the study of alternative desktop tools, namely QGIS. This ministry has already switched to OpenOffice and changed their Access databases to PostGIS. No decision has been taken yet but the general opinion on QGIS was positive, the ministry's technical teams have already produced documentation set for their internal formations and are conducting use tests with several services. The main point was to determine if QGIS was able to fulfill 100% of MapInfo's uses and the answer was mixed : no on some aspects (no font/annotation layer type, different proportional symbols aka #960, etc.) and far more on others (labelv2, symbology, sql, etc.). Several tests were also done to determine the effort needed to customize QGIS, and two tools were developed : - SelectPlusFr, a plugin based on Barry
[Qgis-developer] QGIS - French Ministry of Environment
Hi, here is a very short resume of a QGIS party that was organized a few days ago by the French Ministry of Environment (MEEDDM [1]) to exchange informations on Quantum GIS, in order to determine the possibility of its use as one of their GIS desktop tools. Most of the participants were technical members of the ministry and its local branches, and Vincent Picavet (OSGEO-fr treasurer) and I (OSGEO-fr/QGIS). QGIS is being used internally for months by some of their agents or departments in parallel with the actual official tool, which is MapInfo. The ministry is ongoing a rationalization of their actual software base, leading to the adoption of web gis and the study of alternative desktop tools, namely QGIS. This ministry has already switched to OpenOffice and changed their Access databases to PostGIS. No decision has been taken yet but the general opinion on QGIS was positive, the ministry's technical teams have already produced documentation set for their internal formations and are conducting use tests with several services. The main point was to determine if QGIS was able to fulfill 100% of MapInfo's uses and the answer was mixed : no on some aspects (no font/annotation layer type, different proportional symbols aka #960, etc.) and far more on others (labelv2, symbology, sql, etc.). Several tests were also done to determine the effort needed to customize QGIS, and two tools were developed : - SelectPlusFr, a plugin based on Barry ROWLINGSON's SelectPlus extending the selection tools - OpenWOR, a plugin which allows to partly open .wor file in QGIS (I'll post more on that later) A decision on migrating part of the software base is still to be discussed, but the technical team of the ministry already intends to contribute code (aforementioned plugins at least) and would like to provide financial support to QGIS in some way. Regards, MORREALE Jean Roc [1] http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/ ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] Disable qgis mapserver at compilation
Hi, Is there a way to compile the actual svn trunk without 'qgis mapserver' ? I don't want to make a build depending on fcgi but I've not found if there is a cmake's flag for it. I don't feel confident enought to editing CMakeList.txt :p Regards, MORREALE Jean Roc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Disable qgis mapserver at compilation
Le 12/09/2010 17:15, Anne Ghisla a écrit : On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 17:11 +0200, MORREALE Jean Roc wrote: Hi, Is there a way to compile the actual svn trunk without 'qgis mapserver' ? I don't want to make a build depending on fcgi but I've not found if there is a cmake's flag for it. I don't feel confident enought to editing CMakeList.txt :p Hi Jean-Roc, sure! you can set WITH_MAPSERVER=FALSE Thank Anne ! ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] new GRASS 6.4 modules
Le 11/09/2010 07:46, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il 10/09/2010 20:02, MORREALE Jean Roc ha scritto: Paolo, if it is not of a too high level, could it be possible to write a wiki page explaining how to wrote and update the grass modules in qgis ? I would like to help on this point but I don't know how. Simple: http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Adding_New_Tools_to_the_GRASS_Toolbox See also: http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Adding_New_Tools_to_the_GRASS_Toolbox#Modules_which_can_be_added and following. (and yes, Markus, this replies to your other suggestion too; see and below). All the best. Thanks, it's just a xml file so I think I'll be able to give a try :) ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] porting QGIS to Android?
Le 01/09/2010 19:32, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Hi all. Android, although not really free, is a very interesting platform for mobile. A range on cheap and reasonably powerful tablets has been announced by various HW vendors, eg http://www.archos.com Is anybody interested in porting QGIS to Android? Does anybody have an idea on how difficult this could be? What are the major issues, apart from resizing the dialogs? Qt porting is underway: http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/ but of course a number of dependencies will have to be solved. Any opinion? All the best. It depends on the aim (gps tracker, field editing, etc.) but a mobile gis is far from being a simple scale-down of the software, I would say that it would requires a complete GUI overhaul to fit with the reduced space screen and the limited user input. If you have the opportunity, give a try to Trimble TerraSync, this tool is an ergonomic masterpiece for small screens. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] HTML manual
Please don't hijack thread as it make harder to follow the discussion. Le 29/08/2010 16:56, Noli Sicad a écrit : I hope QGIS has html user manual aside from pdf manual. It offers quick and easy access to what you need rather than downloading the whole pdf which is quite big (e.g. 2 Mb) because of the screenshots and figures. If you are user in the developing countries or with a slow internet connection you don't want to download this pdf manuals if it is bigger than 1 Mb. An html version of the latex manual is on my ToDo-list but it isn't as simple as I expected. A latex version without any figures can be compiled easily if needed. Html / website user manual promotes / offers visibility of the project as well for example uDig has friendly manuals. Aside from it, it is harder to read pdf manual when the manual has more than 10 pages. The embedded pdf bookmarks are a killer feature, that and being able to drop a pdf on a usb key with the certitude that my technicians will be able to open it. Probably we should consider Wiki Book /Wiki for QGIS, so users can contribute as well. The QGIS plugins need documentation. I'm all for it, the easiness of the contribution would be a definite and mediawiki (at least the one used by osgeo.org) allows to print a pdf. But I'll not be the one doing the port :p ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Integration of QGIS mapserver to svn?
Le 23/08/2010 21:08, Andreas Neumann a écrit : +0 for QGIS Server and +1 for QGIS Mobile. While I like QGIS Server as a name, there may be different QGIS Servers in the future? Maybe a QGIS WFS server? Or a QGIS WPS or geoprocessing server? Or a QGIS printserver? I would see QGIS Server as a family of upcoming potential servers and QGIS WMS server for the great work that Marco just did. I also still like QGIS Mapserver or QGIS Webmap Server which actually describes what it is - serving styled maps for web-connected devices and applications. Any other opinions? Andreas mapserver is a word to avoid as it will be very difficult to search for it in google withouth getting all the results concerning th UMN MapServer, the MapServer extension in QGIS, etc. ps : sorry for the doublon andreas, wrong button ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] The new QGIS plugin repo
Le 15/08/2010 10:01, Paolo Cavallini a écrit : Il 05/07/2010 08:49, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto: At the same time, a system for: - counting the number of downloads - giving a rank - sharing comments - sorting by popularity, number of downloads, date - tagging and searching is something useful, and everybody is expect such a system (see eg the FireFox addons: https://addons.mozilla.org/it/firefox/). http://ghns.freedesktop.org/ http://www.kstuff.org/projects/hotstuff it used in kde to collect applets, scripts, themes, etc. and does all that you list ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
