Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-31 Thread Alexander Bruy
Hi,

I'm agree with Nathan: merging such large code when we are too close
for release may cause some problems and bugs.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
 Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous.  If
 it had been in master for a couple of months then I would say cool, but if
 it's in its own branch there wouldn't have been very wide user testing.

-- 
Alexander Bruy
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-31 Thread Marco Hugentobler

Hi

The public repo has
not seen any change in the last two months

There is a raster_resampler branch in the public repo (with no change in 
the last two months) and the raster_resampler branch in the mhugent 
clone. In the second repo, I continously redesigned the raster layer 
class. At the moment, I'm splitting the writeXML / readXML code of the 
raster layer class to the renderer subclasses. My plan was to have the 
code mergeable until the developer meeting in Lyon and discussing 
pending issues there (e.g. gui design).


It would be possible for me to put some effort into it tomorrow to make 
the code mergeable. But then, it is very likely it introduces new issues 
because it changes large parts of QgsRasterLayer / 
QgsRasterLayerProperties (but it also resolves a few existing issues). 
So it probably is too risky for 1.8 (even if it does not break the API).


Regards,
Marco

On 30.03.2012 22:10, Tim Sutton wrote:

Hi

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net  wrote:

Hi,

Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo has
not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more
backup.


Marco - are you ready to merge?

Regards

Tim


regards,
jean-roc

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer






--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux  Open Source Solutions
Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-31 Thread Nathan Woodrow
My major concern with the 1.8 release is getting all the non api breaking
features from master into the 1.8 branch and keeping track of which ones
are in there.  master is so fast moving that it's hard to keep
track, especially when the order of commits (and some of the ids) are
different to the master line.

I tried to do a: git log master..release-1_8 which tells you which commits
are differing between the two branches.  I counted 589 commits using wc -l

IMHO what would be better would be to branch 1.8 from master now and revert
the commits that we know break API using: git revert {commit id}.  Dealing
with conflicts as we go.  I think the number of reverts would be less then
the number of commits that need to be cherry-picked and conflicts resolved.
 I'm not sure how many parts of QGIS are relying on the the breaking API
parts but I suspect it wouldn't be many.

Unless someone knows a better way to handle this.

- Nathan

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Marco Hugentobler 
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote:

 Hi


 The public repo has
 not seen any change in the last two months

 There is a raster_resampler branch in the public repo (with no change in
 the last two months) and the raster_resampler branch in the mhugent clone.
 In the second repo, I continously redesigned the raster layer class. At the
 moment, I'm splitting the writeXML / readXML code of the raster layer class
 to the renderer subclasses. My plan was to have the code mergeable until
 the developer meeting in Lyon and discussing pending issues there (e.g. gui
 design).

 It would be possible for me to put some effort into it tomorrow to make
 the code mergeable. But then, it is very likely it introduces new issues
 because it changes large parts of QgsRasterLayer / QgsRasterLayerProperties
 (but it also resolves a few existing issues). So it probably is too risky
 for 1.8 (even if it does not break the API).

 Regards,
 Marco


 On 30.03.2012 22:10, Tim Sutton wrote:

 Hi

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
 jr.morre...@enoreth.net  wrote:

 Hi,

 Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo
 has
 not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
 keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more
 backup.

  Marco - are you ready to merge?

 Regards

 Tim

  regards,
 jean-roc

 __**_
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developerhttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer





 --
 Dr. Marco Hugentobler
 Sourcepole -  Linux  Open Source Solutions
 Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland
 marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.**ch marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch
 http://www.sourcepole.ch
 Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee


 __**_
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developerhttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-31 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
 My major concern with the 1.8 release is getting all the non api breaking
 features from master into the 1.8 branch and keeping track of which ones are
 in there.  master is so fast moving that it's hard to keep track, especially
 when the order of commits (and some of the ids) are different to the master
 line.

 I tried to do a: git log master..release-1_8 which tells you which commits
 are differing between the two branches.  I counted 589 commits using wc -l

 IMHO what would be better would be to branch 1.8 from master now and revert
 the commits that we know break API using: git revert {commit id}.  Dealing
 with conflicts as we go.  I think the number of reverts would be less then
 the number of commits that need to be cherry-picked and conflicts resolved.
  I'm not sure how many parts of QGIS are relying on the the breaking API
 parts but I suspect it wouldn't be many.


I am happy to do this if we can get a handle on which specific commits
break api (or just add thin wrappers around api breakages if possible)
- though I dont know how simple it will be to do that

Regards

Tim

 Unless someone knows a better way to handle this.

 - Nathan


 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Marco Hugentobler
 marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote:

 Hi


 The public repo has
 not seen any change in the last two months

 There is a raster_resampler branch in the public repo (with no change in
 the last two months) and the raster_resampler branch in the mhugent clone.
 In the second repo, I continously redesigned the raster layer class. At the
 moment, I'm splitting the writeXML / readXML code of the raster layer class
 to the renderer subclasses. My plan was to have the code mergeable until the
 developer meeting in Lyon and discussing pending issues there (e.g. gui
 design).

 It would be possible for me to put some effort into it tomorrow to make
 the code mergeable. But then, it is very likely it introduces new issues
 because it changes large parts of QgsRasterLayer / QgsRasterLayerProperties
 (but it also resolves a few existing issues). So it probably is too risky
 for 1.8 (even if it does not break the API).

 Regards,
 Marco


 On 30.03.2012 22:10, Tim Sutton wrote:

 Hi

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
 jr.morre...@enoreth.net  wrote:

 Hi,

 Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo
 has
 not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
 keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more
 backup.

 Marco - are you ready to merge?

 Regards

 Tim

 regards,
 jean-roc

 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer





 --
 Dr. Marco Hugentobler
 Sourcepole -  Linux  Open Source Solutions
 Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland
 marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
 Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee


 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer




-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-31 Thread Werner Macho

I am happy to do this if we can get a handle on which specific commits
break api (or just add thin wrappers around api breakages if possible)
- though I dont know how simple it will be to do that

Regards

Tim

Sounds like work for a special task force at the hackfest .. :)
It seems I should write some preparation mails to the translators anyway 
that they are aware that something big is coming soon :)


regards
Werner
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-30 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:
 Hi,

 Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo has
 not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
 keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more
 backup.


Marco - are you ready to merge?

Regards

Tim

 regards,
 jean-roc

 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-30 Thread Nathan Woodrow
Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous.  If
it had been in master for a couple of months then I would say cool, but if
it's in its own branch there wouldn't have been very wide user testing.

What is the performance like with large files?  If I remembered correctly
it struggled with my large ecws.

- Nathan

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:

 Hi

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
 jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo
 has
  not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
  keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more
  backup.
 

 Marco - are you ready to merge?

 Regards

 Tim

  regards,
  jean-roc
 
  ___
  Qgis-developer mailing list
  Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



 --
 Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
 ==
 Please do not email me off-list with technical
 support questions. Using the lists will gain
 more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
 surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

 Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
  * QGIS programming and support services
  * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
  * FOSS Consulting Services
 Skype: timlinux
 Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
 ==
 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-30 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
 Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous.  If
 it had been in master for a couple of months then I would say cool, but if
 it's in its own branch there wouldn't have been very wide user testing.

 What is the performance like with large files?  If I remembered correctly
 it struggled with my large ecws.

 - Nathan


I had similar issues Marco was working on that - I cant recall if it
maintains API compatibility either.  I'd also prefer to wait on it.

Regards

Tim


 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com wrote:

 Hi

 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
 jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo
  has
  not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
  keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the crow to get more
  backup.
 

 Marco - are you ready to merge?

 Regards

 Tim

  regards,
  jean-roc
 
  ___
  Qgis-developer mailing list
  Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



 --
 Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
 ==
 Please do not email me off-list with technical
 support questions. Using the lists will gain
 more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
 surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

 Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
  * QGIS programming and support services
  * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
  * FOSS Consulting Services
 Skype: timlinux
 Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
 ==
 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer





-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-29 Thread Etienne Tourigny
Hi devs,

I have made a few pull requests over on github for nice additions and
fixes to legend and browser dock, gdal and ogr providers as well as
ftools.

Most of it is pretty straightforward (except for the .zip file support
in #109) and it would be great to see in 1.8.

Can this be looked at before the imminent feature freeze?

Regards,
Etienne

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi!


 I like the name but prefer Jean Rocs pic (actually I already made his
 pic into a nice splash).

 Regards

 Tim
 Good Choice
 +1 from me as I would have choosen the same ..

 Yeah 1.8 is slowly coming ;)

 regards
 Werner
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk9rIG4ACgkQDAH1YiCxBglrNwCfXH5AwdKf0qwNHVvJ8HyF0gSI
 ivcAnAj+GyFpFyPU29WtEygL7VucF8CK
 =brFg
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-29 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Etienne Tourigny
etourigny@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi devs,

 I have made a few pull requests over on github for nice additions and
 fixes to legend and browser dock, gdal and ogr providers as well as
 ftools.

 Most of it is pretty straightforward (except for the .zip file support
 in #109) and it would be great to see in 1.8.

 Can this be looked at before the imminent feature freeze?


Yes I have seen your pull requests - I or others will go through all
pending requests before announcing the freeze.


Regards

Tim




 Regards,
 Etienne

 On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi!


 I like the name but prefer Jean Rocs pic (actually I already made his
 pic into a nice splash).

 Regards

 Tim
 Good Choice
 +1 from me as I would have choosen the same ..

 Yeah 1.8 is slowly coming ;)

 regards
 Werner
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk9rIG4ACgkQDAH1YiCxBglrNwCfXH5AwdKf0qwNHVvJ8HyF0gSI
 ivcAnAj+GyFpFyPU29WtEygL7VucF8CK
 =brFg
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 21/03/2012 20:18, Tim Sutton ha scritto:

 others I guess) but it is time to wrap up 1.8. Some people have asked
 that we do release candidates etc and generally take things a little
 slower before labelling 1.8 as 'stable'. To that end, I will aim to do
 one or more release candidates before the final 1.8 release. I would
 like to do the first RC release during the Lyon hackfest so we need to

Great thing, thanks.
May I suggest to release the first RC *before* the HF? This way, some of the HF 
(and
much of the participation of users during that weekend) could be devoted to 
heavy
testing and bug squashing.
All the best.
-- 
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:11 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:

8---snip---


 There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related -

 http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/


Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da Universitaria?

 And there is some nice historical map which would be great (moons are gone,
 old maps are the new trend) -

 http://historic-cities.huji.ac.il/portugal/lisbon/maps/braun_hogenberg_I_1_1_b.jpg

Yes I love the old maps themes+1 from me. The map you referenced
has a bug copyright on it at the bottom. Can you find one that is ok
for use to use (or get confirmation to use that one)?

Regards

Tim

 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
 Il 21/03/2012 20:18, Tim Sutton ha scritto:

 others I guess) but it is time to wrap up 1.8. Some people have asked
 that we do release candidates etc and generally take things a little
 slower before labelling 1.8 as 'stable'. To that end, I will aim to do
 one or more release candidates before the final 1.8 release. I would
 like to do the first RC release during the Lyon hackfest so we need to

 Great thing, thanks.
 May I suggest to release the first RC *before* the HF? This way, some of the 
 HF (and
 much of the participation of users during that weekend) could be devoted to 
 heavy
 testing and bug squashing.
 All the best.


Ok then I will adjust the timeline to:

* if you have any outstanding features or api extensions (no breakages
please) that are not yet patched / backported into the 1.8 branch
pleased do so as before 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012 to make sure your
features make it into the release.
* string freeze will take effect from 7 April 23h59 GMT2012 after
which point only bug fixes
will be accepted in the 1.8 branch.
* I will put out the RC 8 April 23h59 GMT2012p, and we will allow
translation contributions and bug fixes to continue until the point
where we decide we are going to put out 1.8 final

Ill send out a new notice so the above information does not get lost
in this thread.

Regards

Tim

 --
 Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
 www.faunalia.eu
 Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread jr . morreale
Non-commercial use is authorized, the copyright has to be included 
(IPTC's field is enough)


On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:39:27 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:

Hi

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:11 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:

8---snip---



There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related 
-


http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/



Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da 
Universitaria?


And there is some nice historical map which would be great (moons 
are gone,

old maps are the new trend) -


http://historic-cities.huji.ac.il/portugal/lisbon/maps/braun_hogenberg_I_1_1_b.jpg


Yes I love the old maps themes+1 from me. The map you referenced
has a bug copyright on it at the bottom. Can you find one that is ok
for use to use (or get confirmation to use that one)?

Regards

Tim


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

 Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da Universitaria?

Forget that idea - I realised that probably means 'avenue'...

Tim

-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread jr . morreale

This could be seen as a reference to a deprecated coding language :)

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:17:50 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:

Hi

Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da 
Universitaria?



Forget that idea - I realised that probably means 'avenue'...

Tim


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


RE: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Duarte Carreira
Call it Lisboa.

Here's a good Picture: 
http://images.wikia.com/artepedia/pt/images/7/7b/Rosa-dos-Ventos-do-Padrao-dos-Descobrimentos.jpg

I am not aware of any trademark with the name of the capital...I think it's not 
possible to register(??)

Duarte

-Mensagem original-
De: MORREALE Jean Roc [mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net] 
Enviada: quarta-feira, 21 de Março de 2012 20:12
Para: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Assunto: Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit :
 Hi

 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi 
 giovanni.man...@gmail.com  wrote:

 Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
 Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?

 if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)


 I thought you might say that! Are their any heavily trademarked 
 products called Lisbon out there in the GIS space? Maybe better would 
 be to use the local neighbourhood of the university?

 Regards

 Tim

There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related -

http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/

And there is some nice historical map which would be great (moons are gone, old 
maps are the new trend) -

http://historic-cities.huji.ac.il/portugal/lisbon/maps/braun_hogenberg_I_1_1_b.jpg


___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Duarte Carreira dcarre...@edia.pt wrote:
 Call it Lisboa.

 Here's a good Picture: 
 http://images.wikia.com/artepedia/pt/images/7/7b/Rosa-dos-Ventos-do-Padrao-dos-Descobrimentos.jpg

 I am not aware of any trademark with the name of the capital...I think it's 
 not possible to register(??)


I like the name but prefer Jean Rocs pic (actually I already made his
pic into a nice splash).

Regards

Tim

 Duarte

 -Mensagem original-
 De: MORREALE Jean Roc [mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net]
 Enviada: quarta-feira, 21 de Março de 2012 20:12
 Para: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 Assunto: Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

 Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit :
 Hi

 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi
 giovanni.man...@gmail.com  wrote:

 Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
 Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?

 if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)


 I thought you might say that! Are their any heavily trademarked
 products called Lisbon out there in the GIS space? Maybe better would
 be to use the local neighbourhood of the university?

 Regards

 Tim

 There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related -

 http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/

 And there is some nice historical map which would be great (moons are gone, 
 old maps are the new trend) -

 http://historic-cities.huji.ac.il/portugal/lisbon/maps/braun_hogenberg_I_1_1_b.jpg


 ___
 Qgis-developer mailing list
 Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
 http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-22 Thread Werner Macho

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi!


 I like the name but prefer Jean Rocs pic (actually I already made his
 pic into a nice splash).

 Regards

 Tim
Good Choice
+1 from me as I would have choosen the same ..

Yeah 1.8 is slowly coming ;)

regards
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9rIG4ACgkQDAH1YiCxBglrNwCfXH5AwdKf0qwNHVvJ8HyF0gSI
ivcAnAj+GyFpFyPU29WtEygL7VucF8CK
=brFg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-21 Thread Giovanni Manghi

 Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
 Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?

if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)

cheers!

-- Giovanni --

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-21 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@gmail.com wrote:

 Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
 Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?

 if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)


I thought you might say that! Are their any heavily trademarked
products called Lisbon out there in the GIS space? Maybe better would
be to use the local neighbourhood of the university?

Regards

Tim


 cheers!

 -- Giovanni --




-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012

2012-03-21 Thread MORREALE Jean Roc

Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit :

Hi

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@gmail.com  wrote:



Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?


if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)



I thought you might say that! Are their any heavily trademarked
products called Lisbon out there in the GIS space? Maybe better would
be to use the local neighbourhood of the university?

Regards

Tim


There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related -

http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/

And there is some nice historical map which would be great (moons are 
gone, old maps are the new trend) -


http://historic-cities.huji.ac.il/portugal/lisbon/maps/braun_hogenberg_I_1_1_b.jpg
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer