Re: [ql-users] QPC Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread ian . pizer
YES, Marcel, that is exactly what I have! What next?

Ian

-- Message original --
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:24:32 +0100
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC Keyboard
Cc: 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
 azerty (french)
 qwerty (english)
 azertz (german)?

The last one should be qwertz, surely.

Asked another way, is it perhaps this layout:
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/keyboards/kbdsf.htm
(probably only properly viewable with internet explorer, go with the
mouse over shift to see the shiftet state)

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QPC Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread ian . pizer
Jon, you are right, it is a Swiss keyboard. I would be glad to use your work
when finished. But if you can do it maybe I can too. How do you do it, is
it frantically difficult?

Ian 

-- Message original --
From: Dent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QPC Keyboard
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:11:09 +0100
Cc: 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
 If you have a french keyboard:
 Forget Cueshell. exec QPC with the shift button held down to get the
config
 window.
 Set code du pays to 33.

 Then hit the sauver button!

 Now do OK.

 AND CHECK your boot file for a line such as kbd_table xx. If this is
 present, replace xx by 33.


I think Ian said he was using a Swiss French keyboard which is hardly like
the French keyboard at all. In fact it is much more like the
Swiss German (sg) keyboard with the é/ö key set to default to é
with shift é being ö etc.

If this sounds familiar to you Ian I would gladly supply you my nearly
finished sg keyboard table.

You would then have to use (something like)  :

i=RESPR(1024):LBYTES win1_SYSTEM_sg_kbd,i:KBD_TABLE i

in you boot file to load it.

You could then use Wolfgang's very excellent keyboard configurator (clavier)
to swap round the ö/é  shifted and nonshifted key configurations.

If you want to give it a go Ian, let me know and I will supply you with
the
necessary files, as I was so kindly supplied them by members of [ql-users]
not so many months ago.

Jon.

P.S. nearly finished means I haven't dealt with the Alt Gr keys properly
yet
and have set them up as HOT_KEY's in my boot at the moment.



___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Quanta 2005

2005-01-16 Thread Rich Mellor
Just a quick comment - one of the reasons that the Quanta committee seemed  
to want the QL 2005 meeting down south was because they thought that  
Manchester was not capable of holding such a prestigious event.

Well its now apparently good enough for the Labour Party Conference as  
they are moving there...
So why not the QL??

--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
26 Oak Road, Shelfield, Walsall, West Midlands WS4 1RQ
http://www.rwapservices.co.uk/
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread ian . pizer
Thanks to everybody who have been responding. Jon Dent has sent me his solution
and with one line in my boot the problem is solved. Almost every key (shift
or not, AltGr or not) is correct for my Swiss French kbd.

Regards, Ian

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL filename length revisited

2005-01-16 Thread P Witte
George writes:

 Caution! Caution! I was asked by someone to allow any file type to be set
 by GWASS (other than 255 which is special). This implies that someone
 somewhere is perhaps setting up file types of 3 to 254 in assembled
 programs. Suddenly using one of these for another purpose might scare
 the living daylights of this someone.

And so it should. He played with them at his own risk.

Per

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL filename length revisited

2005-01-16 Thread P Witte
Isnt the thing to do here to emulate the Windoze solution? Ie, each
directory entry has a short filename [SFN] wchich complies in every respect
with the old directory specs. The LFN is stored within the directory file in
specially marked records, or in a separate file. Eventually, the old system
could be removed altogether from hard disks, but would always exist for
floppy drives.

To develop this idea a bit further: Keep the old directory structure, but
use it in a different way. Instead of a combined pathame/filename, each
record stores a filename of say max 20 or 22 char long, which may be seen by
old programs that read the raw directory structure. Each directory record
also stores a unique file number (and possibly additional housekeeping
information) and that file number is a unique file identifyer.

A separate utility, a Thing, maintains the real, or user,
directory structure. It can create or delete sub directories on the old
system as it sees fit, to maintain efficient access to its data. It also
provides all the directory services, which could eventually include some
advanced database functionality. All OPEN calls for the relevant devices go
through the Dir Thing. You can supply the full path and filename, or the
short name, or the unique file number to locate the file. It would be easy
to implement Undelete and shortcuts to such a system.

Keeping the old structure allows some degree of backward compatibility, but
more importantly it allows one to deal with the files on the file level
rather than having to deal with them on the block level - a much bigger and
more complicted task. A problem is that many programs that do no more than
simply parse a filename, might fall over, but steps could be taken to
alleviate a lot of that.

The system neednt be mandatory. Only those wanting to read or use long
filenames would have to deploy it.

Per

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I wonder if Jon's solution could be made available to others? I'll put
it on my website when it's finished if you want to. How many users of
Swiss keyboard variants are there?
I guess  that the solution to one such keyboard variation on the more 
widely used ones could be useful to others to help create different 
national keyboard layouts too.

--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:  QL-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Keyboard


Thanks to everybody who have been responding. Jon Dent has sent me
his solution
and with one line in my boot the problem is solved. Almost every key
(shift
or not, AltGr or not) is correct for my Swiss French kbd.
Regards, Ian
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date:
16/01/2005


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] I'm home, dear.

2005-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
ONE PROBLEM.
PROG_USE and DATA_USE are system wide settings and cannot vary 
between  programs.  If you launch one program it could read the 
current PROG_USE  and DATA_USE settings at the time that it is 
started, but again, you have  to presume that the user is going to 
alter these every time that a program  is started.  This is not 
exactly user friendly.
It would be nice if PROG_USE and DATA_USE settings could be local to 
each job.

If anyone ever attempts ot add this, perhaps the neatest way would be 
for them to start off with a copy of the default global settings, but 
for any DATA_USE and PROG_USE commands issued by a job to have a way 
of setting its own local values. You would then need a way of setting 
the global ones separately, so perhaps an extra parameter to DATA_USE 
etc?

--
Dilwyn Jones

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QPC Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody noticed that the various combinations with CAPS such as
CAPS/SHIFT/ALT etc do not work with recent versions of SMSQE on 
QPC2
and on Q40/Q60? The combination DOES work with SuperGold Card +
Super Hermes because Super Hermes has its own keyboard routine I
suppose.
Not sure what you're reffering to. Do you mean that with CAPS-LOCK
some keys do not work like when SHIFT is pressed? In that case this 
is
by design. There is a difference between a CAPS-LOCK and a 
SHIFT-LOCK,
the first one only altering the capitalisation of characters, and 
most
keyboard layouts use CAPS-LOCK.

Marcel
I think what he refers to is that according to the Character Set page 
in the Concepts section of the QL User Guide, different character 
codes can be returned for CTRL CAPS LOCK, ALT CAPS LOCK, etc on a 
traditional QL keyboard.

In QPC2, these codes are not returned if you use something like PRINT 
CODE(INKEY$(-1)) and so programs like Perfection from Digital 
Precision have problems because they actually use these keycodes 224 
to 231.

I wonder if these keypresses are filtered out at keyboard level on a 
PC, stopping QPC2 from getting at them? In that case, there is 
probably no way it can be emulated.

AFAIK Perfection was the only program ever to use these keycodes 
generated by CAPS LOCK and the combinations of SHIFT, ALT and CTRL 
keys, it might not be worthwhile trying to emulate these keypresses.

224 Caps lock
225 alt caps lock
226 ctrl caps lock
227 alt ctrl caps lock
228 shift caps lock
229 shift alt caps lock
230 shift ctrl caps lock
231 shift ctrl alt caps lock
--
Dilwyn Jones

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QLib maintained

2005-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I have drawn a blank with a similar quest in trying to contact 
David
Batty of Sector Software for the Perfection software.
Sector Software
Attn: Mr D Batty
39 Wray Crescent
Ulnes Walton
PRESTON
Lancs
PR26 8HN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01772 454328
Thanks,  Yet that is the postal address which has drawn a blank.
It is definitely his current address. If you've had no reply, he's 
ignored or forgotten your letter.

There also appears to be several email addresses, for sector 
software. I have tried :

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although it is not unusual for a person to change the latter.
There's also another enquiry email address on the Typing Tutor page of 
his website.

I included that one in the list of email addresses I used to try to 
contact him too.

--
Dilwyn Jones

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] I'm home, dear.

2005-01-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
 I mean things like .. and \ (root directory) of DOS.
 Yes!!
Ok, so at least one likes my idea :-)
Two, I hope?
Three now, I like the idea of having '..' etc too!
 Shouldn't we just decide on a suggested value now instead of 
 making
 it dynamic (things like configuration options can't be dynamic
 anyway)? Windows has a max path length of 260 characters for 
 example
 (UNC names can actually be longer, but hardly anybody uses them 
 for
 local files).
 As long as it is a reasonable limit.

Sure. What's reasonable for you?
How about using the same as the enhanced ISO9660 standard (Joliet)? 
That
might be one complication less.
Then one day should we ever have CD writing it'll be in place and 
ready!

--
Dilwyn Jones

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 16/01/2005
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QPC Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread Tony Firshman
On  Sun, 16 Jan 2005 at 17:02:39, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 snip
In QPC2, these codes are not returned if you use something like PRINT 
CODE(INKEY$(-1)) and so programs like Perfection from Digital Precision 
have problems because they actually use these keycodes 224 to 231.

I wonder if these keypresses are filtered out at keyboard level on a 
PC, stopping QPC2 from getting at them? In that case, there is probably 
no way it can be emulated.
I think we get all these on superHermes, so if they don;t get through it 
is not the keyboard, but later on.
AFAIK Perfection was the only program ever to use these keycodes 
generated by CAPS LOCK and the combinations of SHIFT, ALT and CTRL 
keys, it might not be worthwhile trying to emulate these keypresses.

224 Caps lock
225 alt caps lock
226 ctrl caps lock
227 alt ctrl caps lock
228 shift caps lock
229 shift alt caps lock
230 shift ctrl caps lock
231 shift ctrl alt caps lock
snip

--
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
 tony@surname.co.uk  http://firshman.co.uk
   Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quanta 2005

2005-01-16 Thread John Gilpin

- Original Message - 
From: Rich Mellor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta 2005


 Just a quick comment - one of the reasons that the Quanta committee seemed
 to want the QL 2005 meeting down south was because they thought that
 Manchester was not capable of holding such a prestigious event.

 Well its now apparently good enough for the Labour Party Conference as
 they are moving there...
 So why not the QL??

 -- 
 Rich Mellor
 RWAP Services
 26 Oak Road, Shelfield, Walsall, West Midlands WS4 1RQ
JG

Everyone seems to think that Manchester is built out of Scout Huts (or
Headquarters as we prefer to call them!)

We are already looking for a more prestigious venue for AGM 2006.

Rest assured, We'll find one!

Regards,

John Gilpin
Nemqlug Sub-Group.

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

I wonder if Jon's solution could be made available to others? I'll put
it on my website when it's finished if you want to. How many users of
Swiss keyboard variants are there?
I guess  that the solution to one such keyboard variation on the more 
widely used ones could be useful to others to help create different 
national keyboard layouts too.
Good idea to have Jon's solution available to others.  Presumably it can 
be modified to suit other variations that are a problem.

Ian did email me privately with the keyboard problem that he was having.
My suggestion was to check the language setting in Windows.  I had 
forgotten about the setting check in QPC.

However, all of these did not solve the problem until Jon's solution.
In addition, I suggested putting the problem to this list/
Once again, it shows what knowledge there is from the subscribers to the 
list.

- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:  QL-Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Keyboard

Thanks to everybody who have been responding. Jon Dent has sent me
his solution
and with one line in my boot the problem is solved. Almost every key
(shift
or not, AltGr or not) is correct for my Swiss French kbd.
Regards, Ian
--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quanta 2005

2005-01-16 Thread David Tubbs
At 18:07 16/01/2005 +, you wrote:
Everyone seems to think that Manchester is built out of Scout Huts (or
Headquarters as we prefer to call them!)
We are already looking for a more prestigious venue for AGM 2006.
So the 2005 on the very edge of the country, almost as far away from as 
many members as possible.

Should make for a quiet AGM and for the swapping of hats.
You could start from the other end, where do members/users live ?
Select a location to suit them, the possible visitors rather than a clique.
But from a general point of convenience it would surely be Brum or London.
For whom is the prestige being sought ?  Is it the 300 or so members, or 
the handful that responded to the survey, what potential or likely 
attendance ?

Perhaps a Scout hut after all.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quanta 2005

2005-01-16 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - 
From: Rich Mellor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: [ql-users] Quanta 2005


Just a quick comment - one of the reasons that the Quanta committee seemed 
to want the QL 2005 meeting down south was because they thought that 
Manchester was not capable of holding such a prestigious event.

Well its now apparently good enough for the Labour Party Conference as 
they are moving there...
So why not the QL??

Because as an organisation Quanta is not worried by massive Liberal Democrat 
gains in the Manchester area.

Whilst I would agree there is a general prejudice against Manchester, or 
anything north of the Thames, in the QL community, that was not relevant to 
Quanta's decision. It had much more to do with the cock-up theory. Or our 
old friends, the keywords PISS_UP and BREWERY.

Quanta's current aim is to make the AGM the number one UK show each year. In 
May 2004 the committee decided to hold a two day show (QL2005) to include 
the AGM somewhere in the south as it was the south's turn. For reasons that 
are still unclear to me by the end of October 2004 nothing had been done to 
organise this. By that time it was too late for the deadlines of both the 
Quanta Magazine and QL-Today to ensure adequate publicity beforehand or to 
arrange a show programme. The event was postponed until October and for some 
reason the decision to remain in the south stuck.

John Gilpin would like to have a major event (+AGM) in Manchester at the end 
of April 2006. Let's be positive and make something good of that,

Best Wishes,
Geoff (personal) 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quanta 2005

2005-01-16 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - 
From: David Tubbs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Quanta 2005

You could start from the other end, where do members/users live ?
Select a location to suit them, the possible visitors rather than a 
clique.

If you are a member of Quanta, you should already know the answer to this 
question. See my article in the Quanta Magazine Vol 21 issue 5/6 page 14.

If you are not a member of Quanta, I am not interested in your opinions 
about where we hold our AGM,

Best Wishes,
Geoff (personal) 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm