[qmailtoaster] Move spam to Spam Folder

[Firdaus Tjahyadi]

Dear All


My bos want me to configure our webmail like gmail/yahoo webmail
that have Inbox, Sent, Trash & Spam Folder
and Report spam, not spam button.
to move spam to Spam folder and ham to Inbox folder

i had configure spam detection in qmailadmin and work fine to detect and
move spam to Spam Folder

but the problem is how to move spam in Inbox to Spam Folder
and ham in Spam Folder to Inbox Folder ?

i had use spam_button squirrelmail plugin but that plugins did'nt have move
feature that i need


any experince to set this ?

thanks


regards

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Gabriel Lai]

ok, am doing yum update now 
thx

- Original Message 
From: Vince Callaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:55:33 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:40 -0800, Gabriel Lai wrote:
> I was doing dependecy check with QT FC script.

I'm curious as to if you did a "yum update" after doing the OS install.
It's been my experience that it is required before installing toaster.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








 

Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Vince Callaway]

On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:40 -0800, Gabriel Lai wrote:
> I was doing dependecy check with QT FC script.

I'm curious as to if you did a "yum update" after doing the OS install.
It's been my experience that it is required before installing toaster.



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Gabriel Lai]

how can I get it installed? pls assist.

- Original Message 
From: Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:49:34 PM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

Sounds like you may be missing either a repo or the fedora project
goofed on a package release.

Erik

On 2/12/07, Gabriel Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was doing dependecy check with QT FC script.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep selinux
> selinux-policy-2.3.18-10
> libselinux-devel-1.30.29-2
> selinux-policy-targeted-2.3.18-10
> libselinux-1.30.29-2
> libselinux-python-1.30.29-2
>
> Cheers
>
>
> - Original Message 
> From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:55:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error
>
> Gabriel Lai wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please help... infact, libselinux is already installed.
> >
> > --> Running transaction check
> > --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> > libselinux-python
> > --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> > libselinux-devel
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> > libselinux-python
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> > libselinux-devel
> >
>
> A bit more information would be helpful.
>
> What were you doing (trying to install) when you get this error?
>
> # rpm -qa | grep selinux
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








 

TV dinner still cooling? 
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Sounds like you may be missing either a repo or the fedora project
goofed on a package release.

Erik

On 2/12/07, Gabriel Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I was doing dependecy check with QT FC script.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep selinux
selinux-policy-2.3.18-10
libselinux-devel-1.30.29-2
selinux-policy-targeted-2.3.18-10
libselinux-1.30.29-2
libselinux-python-1.30.29-2

Cheers


- Original Message 
From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:55:52 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

Gabriel Lai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please help... infact, libselinux is already installed.
>
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> libselinux-python
> --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> libselinux-devel
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> libselinux-python
> Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> libselinux-devel
>

A bit more information would be helpful.

What were you doing (trying to install) when you get this error?

# rpm -qa | grep selinux

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Gabriel Lai]

I was doing dependecy check with QT FC script.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep selinux
selinux-policy-2.3.18-10
libselinux-devel-1.30.29-2
selinux-policy-targeted-2.3.18-10
libselinux-1.30.29-2
libselinux-python-1.30.29-2

Cheers

- Original Message 
From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:55:52 AM
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

Gabriel Lai wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> Please help... infact, libselinux is already installed.
>  
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> libselinux-python
> --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> libselinux-devel
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> libselinux-python
> Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> libselinux-devel
> 

A bit more information would be helpful.

What were you doing (trying to install) when you get this error?

# rpm -qa | grep selinux

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








 

8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news

[qmailtoaster] ***SPAM*** Centos 4.0 server set at 509 concurrency remote not really sending that many

[alpha]

Hello,

I've been trying to get my mail server to do more than 1 million emails
per day. I've set remoteconcurrency to 509 and would like to make
it 2045 if at all possible.

Server is dual pentium 4's 2 gigs of ram with 2 gigs for swap and
80gig sataII drive Running Qmail toaster.
I was told I have enough bandwidth for this so that's not an issue.

I've written a custom perl script to send the mail. And I'm not sure
if I should use perl sendmail commands or qmail-inject.

But here is my problem. When I load up the queue, it just dies. I have
to do a qmailctl doqueue to keep the queue running. And then qmailctl 
doqueue a few more times to get the concurrency up to 509.


I really don't think the concurrency is working. I've checked netstat
and when I run qmhandle -s to see stats, I only see maybe 8-10 messages 
leaving the server at 1 time. Shouldn't it be sending 509 messages from the 
queue at each instance?


Well thanks for anyones insight on this issue. I really need to find a 
receipe for a bulk mailer machine. 



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

24x7server wrote:
> hi
> 
> we have two different type of installations of qmail toaster on two different 
> machines
> 
> m/c 1
> redhat enterprise 3
> qmailtoaster without using db for vpopmail
> 
> m/c 2
> fedora 4
> qmailtoaster using mysql mysql 5 db for vpopmail
> 
> both m/c are enabled in the same way with smtp authentication and checks for 
> virus / spam before sending emails by domains hosted on the servers
> 
> we find that in m/c 2 
> while using outlook express there are three stages
> 1) connecting
> 2) authorizing
> 3) sending message -- slow
> 
> the speed of smtp sessions for the first two stages are similar in both 
> machines but in the third stage the m/c 2 takes around 7 seconds where as the 
> m/c 1 sends the message instantly.
> 
> this delay gets troublesome for clients who use mail exchangers for a large 
> no of email ids.
> 
> any idea what the reason could be ?
> 
> rajesh mahadevan
> 

RBLs?
Is either machine using submission (587) port?
Is /var/qmail/control/blacklists the same on both?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] SLOW SMTP SESSION

[24x7server]

hi

we have two different type of installations of qmail toaster on two different 
machines

m/c 1
redhat enterprise 3
qmailtoaster without using db for vpopmail

m/c 2
fedora 4
qmailtoaster using mysql mysql 5 db for vpopmail

both m/c are enabled in the same way with smtp authentication and checks for 
virus / spam before sending emails by domains hosted on the servers

we find that in m/c 2 
while using outlook express there are three stages
1) connecting
2) authorizing
3) sending message -- slow

the speed of smtp sessions for the first two stages are similar in both 
machines but in the third stage the m/c 2 takes around 7 seconds where as the 
m/c 1 sends the message instantly.

this delay gets troublesome for clients who use mail exchangers for a large no 
of email ids.

any idea what the reason could be ?

rajesh mahadevan

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] [Fwd: [CentOS-announce] New mailing lists: CentOS is going international!]

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

I thought many of our members might find this useful.
Kudos to CentOS!


 Original Message 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] New mailing lists: CentOS is going international!
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:57:37 +0100
From: Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: centos-announce@centos.org

Guten Tag, bonjour, saudações, hola, ahoj, welkom and of course hello.

Ladies and gentlemen, the CentOS mailing lists are going international!
Yes, now you can talk about your favourite linux distribution in your
favourite language. If - and that is a big if - you are able to talk in

 - german
 - french
 - czech
 - dutch
 - the brasilian variant of portuguese
 - spanish

Which should be about, ermm, many people - and maybe *you* are one of them.

Let me introduce your hosts for the rest of your lifes:

There is Rodrigo Barbosa, who is running the CentOS-pt-br mailing list,
because he is one of the people who are speaking this language. If that
doesn't make him a good moderator, what else will?

Then there is Tru Huynh of CentOS fame who still has time on his hands
to run CentOS-fr.

Daniel DeKok, resident spell checker (I haven't found an error on the
wiki he didn't spot first) is running CentOS-nl.

David Hrbáč has offered to run CentOS-cz, hoping that he'll still have
some free time after you storm the list.

Roger Peña Escobio and Ernesto Pérez Estévez wanted to do us a big
favour with running the CentOS-es list, answering the multitude of
requests for a spanish CentOS support venue.

And Christoph Maser and me are going to run CentOS-de, just so there is
a german mailing list also.

So give them all a big hand for offering their help!

You can find out about and subscribe to the lists at:

.
.
.
.
.
.

And now go and discuss! Ask questions if you have one! Answer questions
if you know the answer!

Hope to see you here and there,

Ralph

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] About DomainKey again and giving spammers a lesson

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

Done.
Thanks!

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:
> Hey ES,
> 
> Can you put the DKVERIFY options you recommend in the bug tracker as a
> feature request for a new default?
> 
> I want to ensure that this is tracked and becomes the new default, so
> as to keep people from losing important mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Erik
> 
> On 2/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > I've heard about this new feature for quite sometimes, but I haven't
>> > implemented it just yet. Until for the last few days I have been
>> testing
>> > DomainKeys implementation in a lab, and it seems very capable of
>> rejecting
>> > unsolicited mails.
>> >
>> > Thank you everyone for these resources:
>> > http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
>> > http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
>> > http://www.bind9.net/manual/bind/9.3.2/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2564557
>> >
>> > However I still have some things to clear up:
>> > 1. How many mailserver out there that have implement this DK signature?
>>
>> That's hard to tell. I'm using it, but not with the default DKVERIFY.
>>
>> > 2. Will it safe to use the QT option of DKVERIFY="DEfGhIJK"?
>> Wouldn't it
>> > reject many "legitimate" mails who haven't implemented DK signature?
>>
>> If the message isn't signed, qmail-dk simply passes it along.
>>
>> > 3. So, if I decide to temporarily turn off DK verification, is the
>> option
>> > would be: "EfGhIJK"?
>>
>> No, to turn it off for incoming you can use DKVERIFY="". That should let
>> everything pass through.
>>
>> Notes:
>> .) qmail-dk has erroneously flagged a signature from gmail as bad (B)
>> .) qmail-dk does not check (honor) the t=? testing flag in DNS records
>> .) some list servers (googlegroups in particular) pass signed messages
>> on in
>> a manner that causes qmail-dk to return a "G" status.
>>
>> At the present time, I use DKVERIFY="DEfhIJK". I recommend others do the
>> same, until the time when Alexey has a chance to fix things up. He's
>> already
>> done some excellent work fixing up qmail-dk, and has plans to do more.
>>
>> > 4. What options can we use to "give a lesson" to spammer regarding
>> DK? I'm
>> > thinking of giving the "soft reject" so that their mailservers will be
>> > overwhelmed with mails queue.
>>
>> I don't think there's anything more we can do at this point.
>>
>> > Thank you very much for any help. QT is getting awesome everyday :)
>>
>> I agree, and I'm hopful there's more in store! ;)
>>
>> > Fajar
>> >
>>
>> -- 
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] About DomainKey again and giving spammers a lesson

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Hey ES,

Can you put the DKVERIFY options you recommend in the bug tracker as a
feature request for a new default?

I want to ensure that this is tracked and becomes the new default, so
as to keep people from losing important mail.

Thanks,
Erik

On 2/12/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I've heard about this new feature for quite sometimes, but I haven't
> implemented it just yet. Until for the last few days I have been testing
> DomainKeys implementation in a lab, and it seems very capable of rejecting
> unsolicited mails.
>
> Thank you everyone for these resources:
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
> http://www.bind9.net/manual/bind/9.3.2/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2564557
>
> However I still have some things to clear up:
> 1. How many mailserver out there that have implement this DK signature?

That's hard to tell. I'm using it, but not with the default DKVERIFY.

> 2. Will it safe to use the QT option of DKVERIFY="DEfGhIJK"? Wouldn't it
> reject many "legitimate" mails who haven't implemented DK signature?

If the message isn't signed, qmail-dk simply passes it along.

> 3. So, if I decide to temporarily turn off DK verification, is the option
> would be: "EfGhIJK"?

No, to turn it off for incoming you can use DKVERIFY="". That should let
everything pass through.

Notes:
.) qmail-dk has erroneously flagged a signature from gmail as bad (B)
.) qmail-dk does not check (honor) the t=? testing flag in DNS records
.) some list servers (googlegroups in particular) pass signed messages on in
a manner that causes qmail-dk to return a "G" status.

At the present time, I use DKVERIFY="DEfhIJK". I recommend others do the
same, until the time when Alexey has a chance to fix things up. He's already
done some excellent work fixing up qmail-dk, and has plans to do more.

> 4. What options can we use to "give a lesson" to spammer regarding DK? I'm
> thinking of giving the "soft reject" so that their mailservers will be
> overwhelmed with mails queue.

I don't think there's anything more we can do at this point.

> Thank you very much for any help. QT is getting awesome everyday :)

I agree, and I'm hopful there's more in store! ;)

> Fajar
>

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] ping

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Good enough for me.

On 2/12/07, South Computers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yup.

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:

> Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
> people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.
>
> Erik
>
> -
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] About DomainKey again and giving spammers a lesson

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I've heard about this new feature for quite sometimes, but I haven't
> implemented it just yet. Until for the last few days I have been testing
> DomainKeys implementation in a lab, and it seems very capable of rejecting
> unsolicited mails.
> 
> Thank you everyone for these resources:
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
> http://www.bind9.net/manual/bind/9.3.2/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2564557
> 
> However I still have some things to clear up:
> 1. How many mailserver out there that have implement this DK signature?

That's hard to tell. I'm using it, but not with the default DKVERIFY.

> 2. Will it safe to use the QT option of DKVERIFY="DEfGhIJK"? Wouldn't it
> reject many "legitimate" mails who haven't implemented DK signature?

If the message isn't signed, qmail-dk simply passes it along.

> 3. So, if I decide to temporarily turn off DK verification, is the option
> would be: "EfGhIJK"?

No, to turn it off for incoming you can use DKVERIFY="". That should let
everything pass through.

Notes:
.) qmail-dk has erroneously flagged a signature from gmail as bad (B)
.) qmail-dk does not check (honor) the t=? testing flag in DNS records
.) some list servers (googlegroups in particular) pass signed messages on in
a manner that causes qmail-dk to return a "G" status.

At the present time, I use DKVERIFY="DEfhIJK". I recommend others do the
same, until the time when Alexey has a chance to fix things up. He's already
done some excellent work fixing up qmail-dk, and has plans to do more.

> 4. What options can we use to "give a lesson" to spammer regarding DK? I'm
> thinking of giving the "soft reject" so that their mailservers will be
> overwhelmed with mails queue.

I don't think there's anything more we can do at this point.

> Thank you very much for any help. QT is getting awesome everyday :)

I agree, and I'm hopful there's more in store! ;)

> Fajar
> 

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] ping

[South Computers]

Yup.

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:


Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.

Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] About DomainKey again and giving spammers a lesson

[fajarpri]

Hello,
I've heard about this new feature for quite sometimes, but I haven't
implemented it just yet. Until for the last few days I have been testing
DomainKeys implementation in a lab, and it seems very capable of rejecting
unsolicited mails.

Thank you everyone for these resources:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SPF
http://www.bind9.net/manual/bind/9.3.2/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2564557

However I still have some things to clear up:
1. How many mailserver out there that have implement this DK signature?
2. Will it safe to use the QT option of DKVERIFY="DEfGhIJK"? Wouldn't it
reject many "legitimate" mails who haven't implemented DK signature?
3. So, if I decide to temporarily turn off DK verification, is the option
would be: "EfGhIJK"?
4. What options can we use to "give a lesson" to spammer regarding DK? I'm
thinking of giving the "soft reject" so that their mailservers will be
overwhelmed with mails queue.

Thank you very much for any help. QT is getting awesome everyday :)
Fajar

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] ping

[Jake Vickers]

Erik A. Espinoza wrote:

Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.


Ping back.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] ping

[Bill Kwok]

Hi Erik,

I receive the qt list well :)

Just have a off-topic question: I want to setup a service in my qt server,
so that when my users send documents to a specific account, it will reply
with a pdf version of the document.  Can it be done by just using my
existing qt server?

Best regards,
Bill

On 2/13/07, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.

Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] ping

[Erik A. Espinoza]

Testing. Noticed no qmailtoaster e-mail at all and wondering if either
people aren't having issues or if the list is having issues.

Erik

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

Gabriel Lai wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> Please help... infact, libselinux is already installed.
>  
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> libselinux-python
> --> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package:
> libselinux-devel
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> libselinux-python
> Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package
> libselinux-devel
> 

A bit more information would be helpful.

What were you doing (trying to install) when you get this error?

# rpm -qa | grep selinux

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] DKIM Status failed

[Eric \"Shubes\"]

I thought Vince did a pretty good job of explaining this, but it apparently
hasn't sunk in. I'll try once more to explain it.

There's no point (purpose) in changing the name of your key. Just because
its *name* is 'private' doesn't mean that it *is* a private key. Quite the
opposite, in fact. The contents of the DNS TXT record that s= points to
should contain the *public* key, regardless of the s= value.

The s= parameter is the Selector value. This is simply a name (identifier)
given to the key pair so that the receiving server can tell which DNS record
contains the appropriate *public* key for your domain. You can call it
whatever you like, such as 'selid' or 'maildk' or 'orange' or 'narf' or
'poit'. It really doesn't matter from a functional standpoint.

The name you give it is specified when you generate the key pair. See
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys#DomainKey_Generation
The only reason that 'private' is used as a selector id in the example is
that this is the default value used by qmail-dk.

This is admittedly confusing, and a poor choice of names by the qmail-dk
author. The default should probably be changed in the stock toaster (and the
wiki) at some point so that it is more easily understood. Alexey, can we
change the qmail-dk default file name to something a little more
appropriate, such as 'selector' or 'keyname'?

David J. wrote:
> Vince,
> 
> Thank You for giving clues in my problem. How to set My DNS to cahanget
> the vlaue of s=private, into public one ...?? to verify the public key
> status.
> 
> Thank's
> 
> 
> David J.
> 
> - Original Message - From: "Vince Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 10:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] DKIM Status failed
> 
> 
>> On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 20:20 +0700, David J. wrote:
>>> Well if it has to be on private than it's fine, but how to make my
>>> DKIM status recognized ..??
>>
>> I checked your dns and everything looks correct.
>>
>> I suggest visiting this site: http://senderid.espcoalition.org/  To
>> test.  It provides an address to test your mail.
>>
>> The use of the word private in domainkeys has caused some confusion.
>> You are NOT publishing your private key.  You are publishing a public
>> key named private.
>>
>> Your mail signature contains a value of s=private.  That tells the
>> receiver to do a dns lookup for private._domainkey.m2-vision.net to get
>> the public key to verify the signature.
>>


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Fedora Core 6 error

[Gabriel Lai]

Hi all,

Please help... infact, libselinux is already installed. 

--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package: libselinux-python
--> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 for package: libselinux-devel
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package 
libselinux-python
Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 1.30.29-2 is needed by package 
libselinux-devel


 

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html