Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

2007-11-19 Thread Natalio Gatti 
A M:
Thanks! You're right, with authentication enabled everything works fine. I
have to give a shot to the compile option, becouse I have 200 clients
configured without smtp-auth (they are users inside a company).
I'll post the results of the recompilation.

Natalio.

On Nov 19, 2007 12:53 PM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Natalio I've replied in the empf list... dindn't see this one.
>
> check it
>
> As for information:
>
> The policy patch by default enforces auth in every smtp, so only
> authenticated users can send email.
>
> This can be change in the conf file for the policies prior to compile but
> IS NOT recomended has it may invalidate the policy check routine.
>
> AM


>
> 2007/11/18, Natalio Gatti < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm sending this mail to this list becouse it seems that a couple of
> > qToaster's have implemented the empf patch successfully.
> > Yesterday I test an installation of the empf patch provided by A M. I
> > could patch, build and install the new qmail-toaster rpm correctly.
> > I created a file named policy in /var/qmail/control
> > If the file is empty, everything is OK. I can send & receive mail
> > correctla, and for evry mail I can see a log that says:
> >
> > 2007-11-17 05:47:15.505799500 policy_check: local [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> local
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
> > 2007-11-17 05:47:15.505804500 policy_check: policy allows transmission
> >
> > Whenever I put something in that file, all mail is denied. I try the
> > most simple policy (allow-all):
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /var/qmail/control/policy
> > test.com:LREI,
> >
> > And all mail is rejected with the following log:
> > 2007-11-18 06:00:35.245414500 policy_check: local [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> local
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
> > 2007-11-18 06:00:35.245688500 policy_check: sender not authenticated
> >
> > A M, or any of the others who have implemented the empf patch: Am I
> > doing something wrong? Is the policy incorrect?
> >
> > Natalio.
>
>
>
>
> --
> AM
> agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rech aza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread Guillermo Villasana 
Richard, aca en México también la mayoría está boletinada, pero el 
cambio de puerto solo se debe realizar una sola vez, cuando se configura 
el cliente de correo, y funciona tanto para estar en casa como en 
oficina o en otro lugar (claro asumiendo que está usando una laptop).


Saludos

Richard Ramírez wrote:
Bueno yo desactivé esa RBL por que al parecer acá en Perú casi todas 
las IP del los ISP están bloqueadas, practicamente nadie se podía 
conectar a mi servidor desde afuera, y al usuario le parecía molesto 
estar cambiando de puerto cuando viene a la empresa y cuando va a su 
casa o está de visita en otra empresa(en especial a esos usuarios que 
son los que te pagan el sueldo :P) hasta ahora no tengo problemas, 
pero si me es necesario lo vuelvo a activar.


 

 


Saludos,

 


Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas*

soporte mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@gammacargo.com 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Guillermo Villasana escribió:
No debes quitar esto, recuerda que esta el puerto 587 para envío, 
precisamente por este detalle (no usar el puerto 25 en la 
configuración de tus clientes de correo). La razón por la cual en 
ocasiones te funciona el puerto 25 es  porque esa IP no está boletinada.



ArcosCom Linux User wrote:

Yo tengo en ese fichero esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r 
cbl.abuseat.org

-r dnsbl.tqmcube.com -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

lo que tengo que quitar en ese caso es esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org

y dejarlo así:

-r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r 
dnsbl.tqmcube.com

-r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

¿Verdad?

Salu2

El Lun, 19 de Noviembre de 2007, 15:12, Richard Ramírez escribió:
 

Yo tenía el mismo problema, lo que hice fue desactivar esa opción en
*/var/qmail/control/blacklists *ya que mis usuarios se conectaban 
desde
su casa y al parecer el rango de ip's del proveedor estaba en lista 
negra.






Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Ariel escribió:
   
Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las 
listas

negras.
Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.



El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

 

Mirando en:

http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez 
del

25
funciona bien ahora.

¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene 
alguna

explicación al respecto?

Salu2

El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:

   
De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le 
gusta que

envíe e-mails.

Me está soltando cosas así:

451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo 
por el

estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.

Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor 
y no

noté
nada al respecto.

Salu2


- 


 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
- 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  
- 


 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
- 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2667 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com




  




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2669 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com






-
Qm

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rech aza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread Richard Ramírez 
Bueno yo desactivé esa RBL por que al parecer acá en Perú casi todas las 
IP del los ISP están bloqueadas, practicamente nadie se podía conectar a 
mi servidor desde afuera, y al usuario le parecía molesto estar 
cambiando de puerto cuando viene a la empresa y cuando va a su casa o 
está de visita en otra empresa(en especial a esos usuarios que son los 
que te pagan el sueldo :P) hasta ahora no tengo problemas, pero si me es 
necesario lo vuelvo a activar.






Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas*

soporte mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@gammacargo.com 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Guillermo Villasana escribió:
No debes quitar esto, recuerda que esta el puerto 587 para envío, 
precisamente por este detalle (no usar el puerto 25 en la 
configuración de tus clientes de correo). La razón por la cual en 
ocasiones te funciona el puerto 25 es  porque esa IP no está boletinada.



ArcosCom Linux User wrote:

Yo tengo en ese fichero esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r 
cbl.abuseat.org

-r dnsbl.tqmcube.com -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

lo que tengo que quitar en ese caso es esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org

y dejarlo así:

-r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r 
dnsbl.tqmcube.com

-r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

¿Verdad?

Salu2

El Lun, 19 de Noviembre de 2007, 15:12, Richard Ramírez escribió:
 

Yo tenía el mismo problema, lo que hice fue desactivar esa opción en
*/var/qmail/control/blacklists *ya que mis usuarios se conectaban desde
su casa y al parecer el rango de ip's del proveedor estaba en lista 
negra.






Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Ariel escribió:
   

Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las listas
negras.
Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.



El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

 

Mirando en:

http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez del
25
funciona bien ahora.

¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene alguna
explicación al respecto?

Salu2

El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:

   
De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le 
gusta que

envíe e-mails.

Me está soltando cosas así:

451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo por el
estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.

Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor y no
noté
nada al respecto.

Salu2


- 


 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
- 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2667 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com




  




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2669 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rech aza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread Richard Ramírez 

Tú lo has dicho ^^.





Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas*

soporte mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@gammacargo.com 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




ArcosCom Linux User escribió:

Yo tengo en ese fichero esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
-r dnsbl.tqmcube.com -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

lo que tengo que quitar en ese caso es esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org

y dejarlo así:

-r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl.tqmcube.com
-r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

¿Verdad?

Salu2

El Lun, 19 de Noviembre de 2007, 15:12, Richard Ramírez escribió:
  

Yo tenía el mismo problema, lo que hice fue desactivar esa opción en
*/var/qmail/control/blacklists *ya que mis usuarios se conectaban desde
su casa y al parecer el rango de ip's del proveedor estaba en lista negra.





Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Ariel escribió:


Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las listas
negras.
Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.



El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

  

Mirando en:

http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez del
25
funciona bien ahora.

¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene alguna
explicación al respecto?

Salu2

El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:



De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le gusta que
envíe e-mails.

Me está soltando cosas así:

451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo por el
estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.

Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor y no
noté
nada al respecto.

Salu2


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2667 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com




  




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2669 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com



  


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rech aza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread Guillermo Villasana 
No debes quitar esto, recuerda que esta el puerto 587 para envío, 
precisamente por este detalle (no usar el puerto 25 en la configuración 
de tus clientes de correo). La razón por la cual en ocasiones te 
funciona el puerto 25 es  porque esa IP no está boletinada.



ArcosCom Linux User wrote:

Yo tengo en ese fichero esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
-r dnsbl.tqmcube.com -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

lo que tengo que quitar en ese caso es esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org

y dejarlo así:

-r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl.tqmcube.com
-r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

¿Verdad?

Salu2

El Lun, 19 de Noviembre de 2007, 15:12, Richard Ramírez escribió:
  

Yo tenía el mismo problema, lo que hice fue desactivar esa opción en
*/var/qmail/control/blacklists *ya que mis usuarios se conectaban desde
su casa y al parecer el rango de ip's del proveedor estaba en lista negra.





Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Ariel escribió:


Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las listas
negras.
Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.



El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

  

Mirando en:

http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez del
25
funciona bien ahora.

¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene alguna
explicación al respecto?

Salu2

El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:



De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le gusta que
envíe e-mails.

Me está soltando cosas así:

451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo por el
estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.

Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor y no
noté
nada al respecto.

Salu2


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



  

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2667 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com




  




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rechaza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread ArcosCom Linux User 
Yo tengo en ese fichero esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
-r dnsbl.tqmcube.com -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

lo que tengo que quitar en ese caso es esto:

-r zen.spamhaus.org

y dejarlo así:

-r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org -r dnsbl.tqmcube.com
-r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk

¿Verdad?

Salu2

El Lun, 19 de Noviembre de 2007, 15:12, Richard Ramírez escribió:
> Yo tenía el mismo problema, lo que hice fue desactivar esa opción en
> */var/qmail/control/blacklists *ya que mis usuarios se conectaban desde
> su casa y al parecer el rango de ip's del proveedor estaba en lista negra.
>
>
>
>
>
> Saludos,
>
>
>
> Richard Ramírez Ortiz
>
> *Área de Sistemas* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> Ariel escribió:
>> Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las listas
>> negras.
>> Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.
>>
>>
>>
>> El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>
>>> Mirando en:
>>>
>>> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233
>>>
>>> Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez del
>>> 25
>>> funciona bien ahora.
>>>
>>> ¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene alguna
>>> explicación al respecto?
>>>
>>> Salu2
>>>
>>> El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:
>>>
>>>> De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le gusta que
>>>> envíe e-mails.
>>>>
>>>> Me está soltando cosas así:
>>>>
>>>> 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233
>>>>
>>>> ¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo por el
>>>> estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.
>>>>
>>>> Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor y no
>>>> noté
>>>> nada al respecto.
>>>>
>>>> Salu2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -
>>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> __ Información de NOD32, revisión 2667 (20071119) __
>>
>> Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
>> http://www.nod32.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster on Fedora 8

2007-11-19 Thread Erik A. Espinoza 
As I said before, the 1.4 branch will have source rpm's, of course. As
mentioned in the earlier e-mail

"2) The source distribution will be simpler in the rpm style, and
should compile more easily on any distribution

The bad side of #2 is that you will have to handle dependencies and
updates on your own. I will work with anyone to provide such things to
the community, but will not be doing the master list (IE wiki support
only)."

When I say source distribution here, I mean src.rpm.

Thanks,
Erik

On Nov 19, 2007 5:44 AM, L. A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm.
>
> I am not understant fully, in case of 1.4 brach, is it possible to have src 
> rpm, like now in case of 1.3 brach?
>
>
>
> (i'am asking because of i'am using sometimes mandriva and customize qt for my 
> purposes, so i suppose i will have possibility to customize 1.4 also for 
> myself :) (i know about qmailrocks, but i like your version of toaster).)
>
>
>
>
>
> 16.11.07, 02:25, Erik A. Espinoza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Bryan,
>
> > Yes and no.
>
> > The future of QmailToaster lies in a binary path with automatic
>
> > updates. I have been takig my time as I am merging and testing. In
>
> > order to do this, two things will happen.
>
> > 1) The supported OS's are CentOS 3, 4 & 5 x86_64 and 32 bit only
>
> > 2) The source distribution will be simpler in the rpm style, and
>
> > should compile more easily on any distribution
>
> > The bad side of #2 is that you will have to handle dependencies and
>
> > updates on your own. I will work with anyone to provide such things to
>
> > the community, but will not be doing the master list (IE wiki support
>
> > only).
>
> > Long story short, things will get better for most people, but some
>
> > will be negatively affected. It's all about getting the most bang for
>
> > the limited development time. I have no problems with third party
>
> > distro maintainers if someone wants to take on that role once we're
>
> > ready.
>
> > For now, the 1.3 branch stays locked down. No major changes are coming
>
> > on this branch. It will only have updates for the packages currenty
>
> > available.
>
> > I am still taking suggestions for 1.4. For example if someone has info
>
> > on Dovecot integration, I may include that. And I am pretty sure
>
> > SpamDyke makes the cut for 1.4.
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Erik
>
> > On Nov 15, 2007 2:35 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Is there a path to Mandriva 2007?
>
> > > Cheers
>
> > > Bryan
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > > My recommendation would be, don't. Upgrade to CentOS 5. It has a
>
> > > > longer life and will remain supported.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > The QmailToaster is primarily developed and tested on that.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > On Nov 15, 2007 11:51 AM, Diego Pivetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> Olá list,
>
> > > >> I have plans to make upgrade of my server being modified of fedora 4 to
>
> > > >> fedora 8.
>
> > > >> I would like to know if somebody already obtained success on to
>
> > > >> qmailtoaster
>
> > > >> in fedora 8 and if somebody has some tip from as I can proceed to 
> > > >> obtain
>
> > > >> to
>
> > > >> install correctly.
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> Forgive me for my ugly English I from Brazil.
>
> > > >> ;)
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> Atenciosamente,
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >> Diego Pivetta
>
> > > >> Sysmo Informática Ltda.
>
> > > >> www.sysmo.com.br
>
> > > >>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > -
>
> > > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>
> > > > -
>
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > -
>
> > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>
> > > -
>
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > -
>
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>
> > -
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
--

Re: [qmailtoaster] Anyone install squirreloutlook?

2007-11-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Hi,

Yes, I missed with it for a few hours and the problems kept on cropping up. I
could clearly see the path issues but every fix I tried didn't work. For
example, at times, it wanted to see the images in /var/www/html/images, so I
even copied all of the images to that directory and still, same error. This
went on and on.

It's a nice looking interface, I'd like to use it. I should mention as I think
about it that it was *only* the left window which would never display. The
main window was always fine. Perhaps I could get a copy of someone else's
config, maybe I can decipher from that.

Mike


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:21:37 +, A M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed squirreloutlook a couple a months ago fo a client and I'do
> recall some hardcoded settings that I had to change by hand... check the
> files wich have errors and the conf file for squirrel. I think I found a
> couple of path and IP's that I had to change...
>
> 2007/11/19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:>  No, I don't need
> it to look like outlook at all, it's just the only clean look
>> I've come across while searching. That's why I asked the list if there are
>> suggestions. I'd prefer keeping squirrelmail, seems to be liked by all.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:36:49 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >
>>>
 I've tried things like that also. When the path seemed to be
 /var/www/html for example, I would just copy the entire directory
 there.
 But, I have to admit that I forgot to change ownership to the web
 server.
 I'll give it one more try.

>>> I don't have an answer for you then.  If making it look like Outlook is
>>> so
>>> important, why not just use OWA on an Exchange machine?
> I've installed the nutmail.com  themes on some of my machines and
> didn't
> have too many problems. Might be worth looking into. Sure, they're
> $35
 I've emailed him but have not seen a reply. The price is fine, the
 problem is that it's for 6 months of updates. Again, not a problem but
 it's not clear if that means another full payment in 6 months if I
 needed
 an update because squirrlemail made some changes for example. That
 would
 bring the price up to some $60.00/year per server. It's just not clear
 what he wants or how often squirrelmail changes so that I would need
 updates.

>>> For your $35, if Squirrelmail releases a new version in 3 months, you
>>> get
>>> it.  Next year when they release a new version, you'd need to pay $35 to
>>> get an updated copy of his skin (and receive 6 months of updates again).
>>> You don't HAVE to, unless you're one of those people that has to install
>>> every patch that comes out.  The changes that Squirrelmail makes will
>>> not
>>> automatically appear on your machine and break your webmail. Only you
>>> can
>>> do that.
>>> $60 or $70 a year is not a deterrent in my opinion.  If you're running
>>> your
>>> entire business and paying all of your bills off of the efforts of the
>>> people that support open source, why not give a little back? They all
>>> have
>>> bills to pay as well. AND they help out at a "digital feeding kitchen".
>>> Always feeding, but never getting much in return except for complaints
>>> (there are the occasional thank-yous in there).  You could always hire
>>> someone to code a nice interface for you, or purchase Exchange as well.
>>
>>
>> -
>> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Anyone install squirreloutlook?

2007-11-19 Thread A M 
Hi,

I installed squirreloutlook a couple a months ago fo a client and I'do
recall some hardcoded settings that I had to change by hand... check the
files wich have errors and the conf file for squirrel. I think I found a
couple of path and IP's that I had to change...

2007/11/19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> No, I don't need it to look like outlook at all, it's just the only clean
> look
> I've come across while searching. That's why I asked the list if there are
> suggestions. I'd prefer keeping squirrelmail, seems to be liked by all.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:36:49 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >
> >
> >> I've tried things like that also. When the path seemed to be
> >> /var/www/html for example, I would just copy the entire directory
> there.
> >> But, I have to admit that I forgot to change ownership to the web
> server.
> >> I'll give it one more try.
> >>
> > I don't have an answer for you then.  If making it look like Outlook is
> so
> > important, why not just use OWA on an Exchange machine?
> >>> I've installed the nutmail.com themes on some of my machines and
> didn't
> >>> have too many problems. Might be worth looking into. Sure, they're $35
> >> I've emailed him but have not seen a reply. The price is fine, the
> >> problem is that it's for 6 months of updates. Again, not a problem but
> >> it's not clear if that means another full payment in 6 months if I
> needed
> >> an update because squirrlemail made some changes for example. That
> would
> >> bring the price up to some $60.00/year per server. It's just not clear
> >> what he wants or how often squirrelmail changes so that I would need
> >> updates.
> >>
> > For your $35, if Squirrelmail releases a new version in 3 months, you
> get
> > it.  Next year when they release a new version, you'd need to pay $35 to
> > get an updated copy of his skin (and receive 6 months of updates again).
> > You don't HAVE to, unless you're one of those people that has to install
> > every patch that comes out.  The changes that Squirrelmail makes will
> not
> > automatically appear on your machine and break your webmail. Only you
> can
> > do that.
> > $60 or $70 a year is not a deterrent in my opinion.  If you're running
> your
> > entire business and paying all of your bills off of the efforts of the
> > people that support open source, why not give a little back? They all
> have
> > bills to pay as well. AND they help out at a "digital feeding kitchen".
> > Always feeding, but never getting much in return except for complaints
> > (there are the occasional thank-yous in there).  You could always hire
> > someone to code a nice interface for you, or purchase Exchange as well.
>
>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

2007-11-19 Thread A M 
Hi,

Natalio I've replied in the empf list... dindn't see this one.

check it

As for information:

The policy patch by default enforces auth in every smtp, so only
authenticated users can send email.

This can be change in the conf file for the policies prior to compile but IS
NOT recomended has it may invalidate the policy check routine.

AM

2007/11/18, Natalio Gatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm sending this mail to this list becouse it seems that a couple of
> qToaster's have implemented the empf patch successfully.
> Yesterday I test an installation of the empf patch provided by A M. I
> could patch, build and install the new qmail-toaster rpm correctly.
> I created a file named policy in /var/qmail/control
> If the file is empty, everything is OK. I can send & receive mail
> correctla, and for evry mail I can see a log that says:
>
> 2007-11-17 05:47:15.505799500 policy_check: local [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> local
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
> 2007-11-17 05:47:15.505804500 policy_check: policy allows transmission
>
> Whenever I put something in that file, all mail is denied. I try the most
> simple policy (allow-all):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /var/qmail/control/policy
> test.com:LREI,
>
> And all mail is rejected with the following log:
> 2007-11-18 06:00:35.245414500 policy_check: local [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> local
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER)
> 2007-11-18 06:00:35.245688500 policy_check: sender not authenticated
>
> A M, or any of the others who have implemented the empf patch: Am I doing
> something wrong? Is the policy incorrect?
>
> Natalio.




-- 
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Anyone install squirreloutlook?

2007-11-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
No, I don't need it to look like outlook at all, it's just the only clean look
I've come across while searching. That's why I asked the list if there are
suggestions. I'd prefer keeping squirrelmail, seems to be liked by all.

Mike


On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:36:49 -0500, Jake Vickers wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >
>
>> I've tried things like that also. When the path seemed to be
>> /var/www/html for example, I would just copy the entire directory there.
>> But, I have to admit that I forgot to change ownership to the web server.
>> I'll give it one more try.
>>
> I don't have an answer for you then.  If making it look like Outlook is so
> important, why not just use OWA on an Exchange machine?
>>> I've installed the nutmail.com themes on some of my machines and didn't
>>> have too many problems. Might be worth looking into. Sure, they're $35
>> I've emailed him but have not seen a reply. The price is fine, the
>> problem is that it's for 6 months of updates. Again, not a problem but
>> it's not clear if that means another full payment in 6 months if I needed
>> an update because squirrlemail made some changes for example. That would
>> bring the price up to some $60.00/year per server. It's just not clear
>> what he wants or how often squirrelmail changes so that I would need
>> updates.
>>
> For your $35, if Squirrelmail releases a new version in 3 months, you get
> it.  Next year when they release a new version, you'd need to pay $35 to
> get an updated copy of his skin (and receive 6 months of updates again). 
> You don't HAVE to, unless you're one of those people that has to install
> every patch that comes out.  The changes that Squirrelmail makes will not
> automatically appear on your machine and break your webmail. Only you can
> do that.
> $60 or $70 a year is not a deterrent in my opinion.  If you're running your
> entire business and paying all of your bills off of the efforts of the
> people that support open source, why not give a little back? They all have
> bills to pay as well. AND they help out at a "digital feeding kitchen".
> Always feeding, but never getting much in return except for complaints
> (there are the occasional thank-yous in there).  You could always hire
> someone to code a nice interface for you, or purchase Exchange as well.




-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] vqadmin did'nt work disable email relay

2007-11-19 Thread A M 
Hi,

Greatt it helped...

hope to ear good news ;)

AM

2007/11/17, Natalio Gatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> On Jun 22, 2007 11:05 AM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > follows eMPF patch against 1.3.15
> >
> >
> > --
> > AM
> > agmsoft(at)gmail.com
> > -
> > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> Hey A M. I'm installing your empf patch right now. I Just wanted to thank
> you for your work, it made it really easy. I will report the results later
> to the list.
>
> Natalio.
>



-- 
AM
agmsoft(at)gmail.com

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rech aza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread Richard Ramírez 
Yo tenía el mismo problema, lo que hice fue desactivar esa opción en 
*/var/qmail/control/blacklists *ya que mis usuarios se conectaban desde 
su casa y al parecer el rango de ip's del proveedor estaba en lista negra.






Saludos,



Richard Ramírez Ortiz

*Área de Sistemas* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Ariel escribió:

Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las listas negras.
Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.



El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
  

Mirando en:

http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez del 25
funciona bien ahora.

¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene alguna
explicación al respecto?

Salu2

El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:


De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le gusta que
envíe e-mails.

Me está soltando cosas así:

451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233

¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo por el
estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.

Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor y no noté
nada al respecto.

Salu2


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



__ Información de NOD32, revisión 2667 (20071119) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com



  


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmailtoaster on Fedora 8

2007-11-19 Thread L. A. 
hmm.

I am not understant fully, in case of 1.4 brach, is it possible to have src 
rpm, like now in case of 1.3 brach?



(i'am asking because of i'am using sometimes mandriva and customize qt for my 
purposes, so i suppose i will have possibility to customize 1.4 also for myself 
:) (i know about qmailrocks, but i like your version of toaster).)





16.11.07, 02:25, Erik A. Espinoza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):



> Hi Bryan,

> Yes and no.

> The future of QmailToaster lies in a binary path with automatic

> updates. I have been takig my time as I am merging and testing. In

> order to do this, two things will happen.

> 1) The supported OS's are CentOS 3, 4 & 5 x86_64 and 32 bit only

> 2) The source distribution will be simpler in the rpm style, and

> should compile more easily on any distribution

> The bad side of #2 is that you will have to handle dependencies and

> updates on your own. I will work with anyone to provide such things to

> the community, but will not be doing the master list (IE wiki support

> only).

> Long story short, things will get better for most people, but some

> will be negatively affected. It's all about getting the most bang for

> the limited development time. I have no problems with third party

> distro maintainers if someone wants to take on that role once we're

> ready.

> For now, the 1.3 branch stays locked down. No major changes are coming

> on this branch. It will only have updates for the packages currenty

> available.

> I am still taking suggestions for 1.4. For example if someone has info

> on Dovecot integration, I may include that. And I am pretty sure

> SpamDyke makes the cut for 1.4.

> Thanks,

> Erik

> On Nov 15, 2007 2:35 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Hi,

> > Is there a path to Mandriva 2007?

> > Cheers

> > Bryan

> >

> >

> > > My recommendation would be, don't. Upgrade to CentOS 5. It has a

> > > longer life and will remain supported.

> > >

> > > The QmailToaster is primarily developed and tested on that.

> > >

> > > On Nov 15, 2007 11:51 AM, Diego Pivetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Olá list,

> > >> I have plans to make upgrade of my server being modified of fedora 4 to

> > >> fedora 8.

> > >> I would like to know if somebody already obtained success on to

> > >> qmailtoaster

> > >> in fedora 8 and if somebody has some tip from as I can proceed to obtain

> > >> to

> > >> install correctly.

> > >>

> > >> Forgive me for my ugly English I from Brazil.

> > >> ;)

> > >>

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Atenciosamente,

> > >>

> > >> Diego Pivetta

> > >> Sysmo Informática Ltda.

> > >> www.sysmo.com.br

> > >>

> > >

> > > -

> > >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 

> > > -

> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 

> > -

> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> >

> >

> -

>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 

> -

> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] Balasan: Re: [qmailtoaster] send-mail-toaster

2007-11-19 Thread roy mangapul 
Dear Jake 

unfortunately my php program only use dump emails to
php's mail, because it's just a simple php script that
use send mail just like this :
 

is there anyone who ever make same script like this by
changing sendmail with qmailtoaster..

anyway thanks for your explanation jack

Best Regards,


Roy Mangapul

--- Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> roy mangapul wrote:
> > hi guys...
> >
> > I have install qmailtoaster ,but I also use my
> server
> > as portal server but after I install qmailtoaster,
> my
> > send-mail program from PHP couldn't work anymore.
> > I got suspicious that after I remove send mail and
> and
> > install qmailtoaster it makes my send-mail program
> > from   
> > PHP couldn't work anymore
> >
> > but I've seen send-emails-toaster in my
> >
>
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x-86/noarch/send-emails-toaster..is
> > it ok to install considering I already install
> > qmailtoaster,or is it the same application like
> > send-mail in linux
> >
> > anyway thanks to all of you guys
> >   
> send-emails-toaster is an old (and broken) package
> that allowed you to 
> send a message to everyone on your server at once.
> Qmail is just another 
> mailer like sendmail,  Matter of fact it has a
> program called sendmail 
> that allows programs that only use sendmail to still
> send emails (that's 
> a simplified answer).
> Without seeing any errors or having any other
> information we can't 
> answer much more than that. Does your PHP program
> use SMTP-AUTH, or is 
> it just trying to dump emails to php's mail?
> 



   
Bergabunglah dengan orang-orang yang berwawasan, di di bidang Anda! Kunjungi 
Yahoo! Answers saat ini juga di http://id.answers.yahoo.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamd is killing my server

2007-11-19 Thread Jake Vickers 

Ariel wrote:

List, this is normal?
Spamd is killing my server




Cpu(s): 43.7% us,  7.9% sy,  0.0% ni, 30.1% id, 18.2% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   2075128k total,  1813664k used,   261464k free,   198980k buffers
Swap:   522104k total,  164k used,   521940k free,  1046028k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
19948 vpopmail  16   0 38812  33m 2704 S 11.3  1.7   0:57.46 spamd
20118 vpopmail  16   0 41720  36m 2716 S  9.2  1.8   1:01.58 spamd
19946 vpopmail  17   0 39932  34m 2364 S  8.9  1.7   1:04.07 spamd
29595 named 21   0 93492  56m 2020 S  3.9  2.8  10:54.12 named
  458 vpopmail  18   0  6292 3632 1992 S  1.5  0.2   0:00.05 pyzor
  459 vpopmail  18   0  7348 3632 1992 S  1.5  0.2   0:00.05 pyzor
  464 vpopmail  19   0  7692 3636 1992 S  1.5  0.2   0:00.05 pyzor
20119 vpopmail  16   0 40452  34m 2360 S  0.9  1.7   1:00.70 spamd
  


Depending on what rules you're loading, yes.  If you have added all 
kinds of extra rules, or are using the sa-learn functions and not 
cleaning up after it then this is normal. 
You have to remember that for every message that comes in, a spamd 
process has to be created to process it.  And each spamd process will 
load all of the rules into memory.  That's why it's better to block the 
messages at the SMTP level - so you're not creating spamd processes and 
hogging resources every time a message comes in.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] send-mail-toaster

2007-11-19 Thread Jake Vickers 

roy mangapul wrote:

hi guys...

I have install qmailtoaster ,but I also use my server
as portal server but after I install qmailtoaster, my
send-mail program from PHP couldn't work anymore.
I got suspicious that after I remove send mail and and
install qmailtoaster it makes my send-mail program
from   
PHP couldn't work anymore


but I've seen send-emails-toaster in my
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x-86/noarch/send-emails-toaster..is
it ok to install considering I already install
qmailtoaster,or is it the same application like
send-mail in linux

anyway thanks to all of you guys
  
send-emails-toaster is an old (and broken) package that allowed you to 
send a message to everyone on your server at once. Qmail is just another 
mailer like sendmail,  Matter of fact it has a program called sendmail 
that allows programs that only use sendmail to still send emails (that's 
a simplified answer).
Without seeing any errors or having any other information we can't 
answer much more than that. Does your PHP program use SMTP-AUTH, or is 
it just trying to dump emails to php's mail?


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] Anyone install squirreloutlook?

2007-11-19 Thread Jake Vickers 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I've tried things like that also. When the path seemed to be /var/www/html for 
example, I would just copy the entire directory there. But, I have to admit 
that I forgot to change ownership to the web server. I'll give it one more 
try.


  


I don't have an answer for you then.  If making it look like Outlook is 
so important, why not just use OWA on an Exchange machine?

I've installed the nutmail.com themes on some of my machines and didn't
have too many problems. Might be worth looking into.  Sure, they're $35



I've emailed him but have not seen a reply. The price is fine, the problem is 
that it's for 6 months of updates. Again, not a problem but it's not clear if 
that means another full payment in 6 months if I needed an update because 
squirrlemail made some changes for example. That would bring the price up to 
some $60.00/year per server. It's just not clear what he wants or how often 
squirrelmail changes so that I would need updates.


  


For your $35, if Squirrelmail releases a new version in 3 months, you 
get it.  Next year when they release a new version, you'd need to pay 
$35 to get an updated copy of his skin (and receive 6 months of updates 
again).  You don't HAVE to, unless you're one of those people that has 
to install every patch that comes out.  The changes that Squirrelmail 
makes will not automatically appear on your machine and break your 
webmail. Only you can do that.
$60 or $70 a year is not a deterrent in my opinion.  If you're running 
your entire business and paying all of your bills off of the efforts of 
the people that support open source, why not give a little back? They 
all have bills to pay as well. AND they help out at a "digital feeding 
kitchen".  Always feeding, but never getting much in return except for 
complaints (there are the occasional thank-yous in there).  You could 
always hire someone to code a nice interface for you, or purchase 
Exchange as well.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[qmailtoaster] Spamd is killing my server

2007-11-19 Thread Ariel 
List, this is normal?
Spamd is killing my server


qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.12-1.3.15
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6
ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3
libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4
squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.11-1.3.8
ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2
maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.2-1.3.3
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4
libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3
qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3
simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3
maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5
isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3
autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.3
spamassassin-toaster-3.2.3-1.3.12
clamav-toaster-0.91.2-1.3.15
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4
ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3



Cpu(s): 43.7% us,  7.9% sy,  0.0% ni, 30.1% id, 18.2% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   2075128k total,  1813664k used,   261464k free,   198980k buffers
Swap:   522104k total,  164k used,   521940k free,  1046028k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
19948 vpopmail  16   0 38812  33m 2704 S 11.3  1.7   0:57.46 spamd
20118 vpopmail  16   0 41720  36m 2716 S  9.2  1.8   1:01.58 spamd
19946 vpopmail  17   0 39932  34m 2364 S  8.9  1.7   1:04.07 spamd
29595 named 21   0 93492  56m 2020 S  3.9  2.8  10:54.12 named
  458 vpopmail  18   0  6292 3632 1992 S  1.5  0.2   0:00.05 pyzor
  459 vpopmail  18   0  7348 3632 1992 S  1.5  0.2   0:00.05 pyzor
  464 vpopmail  19   0  7692 3636 1992 S  1.5  0.2   0:00.05 pyzor
20119 vpopmail  16   0 40452  34m 2360 S  0.9  1.7   1:00.70 spamd

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] exttodo patch/qmail-todo

2007-11-19 Thread Daniel Dekok 
Anyone got this working under a qmailtoaster setup?

I've got the patch compiling cleaning, and edited the spec file so its
created in the rpm and installs as it should, and once the I restart qmail
the qmail-todo programs running, but i'm unable to get any decent logging,
and i'm not sure if its actually processing the incoming queue.  It also
seems  to complain about being unable to unlink files in the local directory
of the queue.

Probably shouldn't be testing this out on a production system, but thats all
i've got.

If people are interested, I can probably get a copy of my amended exttodo
patch (its mostly just line changes so it patches cleanly after the other
rpm patches are applied) and spec file online.

If people arn't sure what the patch is about, its supposedly to fix the
silly qmail syndrome, as expained here:
http://qmail.jms1.net/silly-qmail.shtml

Re: [qmailtoaster] Mi servidor rechaza mis envíos

2007-11-19 Thread Ariel 
Ese error te lo esta dando la RBL , o sea el chequeo contra las listas negras.
Esa ip que intentas  enviarle esta en lista negra.



El 17/11/07, ArcosCom Linux User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Mirando en:
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233
>
> Veo que configurando mi cliente para que use el puerto 587 en vez del 25
> funciona bien ahora.
>
> ¿A qué se debe este cambio de un día para otro? ¿Alguien tiene alguna
> explicación al respecto?
>
> Salu2
>
> El Dom, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, 0:31, ArcosCom Linux User escribió:
> > De buenas a primeras mi servidor toaster parece que ya no le gusta que
> > envíe e-mails.
> >
> > Me está soltando cosas así:
> >
> > 451 http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=84.123.238.233
> >
> > ¿Alguien puede ayudarme? Es la primera vez que me suelta algo por el
> > estilo y me tiene sin poder enviar e-mails.
> >
> > Hace unos días actualicé los paquetes de toaster en el servidor y no noté
> > nada al respecto.
> >
> > Salu2
> >
> >
> > -
> >  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[qmailtoaster] send-mail-toaster

2007-11-19 Thread roy mangapul 
hi guys...

I have install qmailtoaster ,but I also use my server
as portal server but after I install qmailtoaster, my
send-mail program from PHP couldn't work anymore.
I got suspicious that after I remove send mail and and
install qmailtoaster it makes my send-mail program
from   
PHP couldn't work anymore

but I've seen send-emails-toaster in my
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x-86/noarch/send-emails-toaster..is
it ok to install considering I already install
qmailtoaster,or is it the same application like
send-mail in linux

anyway thanks to all of you guys


best regards,


Roy Mangapul


 


   
Bergabunglah dengan orang-orang yang berwawasan, di di bidang Anda! Kunjungi 
Yahoo! Answers saat ini juga di http://id.answers.yahoo.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]