[racket-users] Re: Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

[George Neuner]

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:20:24 -0500, George Neuner
 wrote:

>You can send directly to racket-users@googlegroups.com


Ok, that was interesting.  I wrote:

   racket-users at googlegroups dot com

and it appears that Gmane changed the address to its own relay.


Stranger still, the copy that showed up in my email says googlegroups
just as I sent it from the news reader.

???
George

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[racket-users] Re: Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

[George Neuner]

Hi Tim,

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:23:00 -0800 (PST), Tim Johnson
 wrote:

>On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:02:20 PM UTC-9, Tim Johnson wrote:
>> I am sending this from my browser, pointed at 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!newtopic/racket-users as a test.
>> 
>> Although I have been receiving emails sent to the Racket Users email list 
>> (racket-users@googlegroups.com) as a subscriber, emails sent by me to the 
>> same list via my desktop email client do not appear to be received or 
>> distributed. 
>> 
>> This is a test.
>> thanks
>
>Clearly, the original post has been received by this list. It was also 
>received by my desktop fetchmail utility. When I replied from my desktop, the 
>reply (as any other email set from my desktop to this list) was shown as 
>"status=sent" from my mail.log, but it is not showing as being received.
>
>My conclusion is that this group is not accepting emails from my desktop. That 
>might mean that something in my IP address or domain/Reverse DNS is causing 
>such a rejection. I currently receive and send to at least two dozen email 
>lists, including ones that I maintain myself, including other google groups 
>and more "traditional" mailman-based setups.
>
>It would be so much more convenient if I could send email to this group from 
>my desktop. I'd appreciate some help or commentary on this matter.
>
>Note - my ISP is as follows:
>mtaonline.net
>
>Thanks
>Tim


You can send directly to racket-users@googlegroups.com

Gmane is searching for a new home and has had problems recently.  If
your posts didn't bounce, they likely are stuck in process and may
show up in a few days.  If you were blocked, you would not be able to
read the group either.

Posted through Gmane.
George

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [racket-users] dynamic-require of a string

[Dan Liebgold]

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 4:46:38 PM UTC-8, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> You'll need to use `eval` to evaluate the module.
> 

Interesting...  If I want to add more context (for errors and such), is there a 
good way to use read-syntax and eval-syntax?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [racket-users] dynamic-require of a string

[Sam Tobin-Hochstadt]

You'll need to use `eval` to evaluate the module.

Something like this: http://pasterack.org/pastes/17703

Sam

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Dan Liebgold
 wrote:
> I have an odd use case, but is there any way to supply a string of the 
> contents of a module to something like require or dynamic-require?
>
> An example of my desired usage: http://pasterack.org/pastes/38798
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[racket-users] dynamic-require of a string

[Dan Liebgold]

I have an odd use case, but is there any way to supply a string of the contents 
of a module to something like require or dynamic-require?

An example of my desired usage: http://pasterack.org/pastes/38798

Thanks,
Dan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [racket-users] syntax-class that is just a set of literals

[Dan Liebgold]

Urg... google groups behaved oddly for me... I posted this original thread but 
it never showed up for me, so I posted a 2nd thread (the one you linked to).

I'm not sure what actually happened, but at least the other thread has lots of 
good info.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [racket-users] syntax-class that is just a set of literals

[Ben Greenman]

Typo: I meant "the `define-literal-syntax-class` macro", from here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/9e_oNlLODeY/MUqGM_r6BwAJ

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Ben Greenman 
wrote:

>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Dan Liebgold  > wrote:
>
>> First, I'm trying to define a syntax-class that is just a set of
>> literals, and I'm wondering if there is a slightly better way that this:
>>
>>  * http://pasterack.org/pastes/86722
>>
>> I'd just prefer to not repeat all the literal definitions.
>>
>
> Here's an idea, inspired by the `define-literal-set` macro Vincent posted
> in the other thread.
> http://pasterack.org/pastes/22325
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [racket-users] syntax-class that is just a set of literals

[Ben Greenman]

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Dan Liebgold 
wrote:

> First, I'm trying to define a syntax-class that is just a set of literals,
> and I'm wondering if there is a slightly better way that this:
>
>  * http://pasterack.org/pastes/86722
>
> I'd just prefer to not repeat all the literal definitions.
>

Here's an idea, inspired by the `define-literal-set` macro Vincent posted
in the other thread.
http://pasterack.org/pastes/22325

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[racket-users] Re: Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

[Tim Johnson]

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:02:20 PM UTC-9, Tim Johnson wrote:
> I am sending this from my browser, pointed at 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!newtopic/racket-users as a test.
> 
> Although I have been receiving emails sent to the Racket Users email list 
> (racket-users@googlegroups.com) as a subscriber, emails sent by me to the 
> same list via my desktop email client do not appear to be received or 
> distributed. 
> 
> This is a test.
> thanks

Clearly, the original post has been received by this list. It was also received 
by my desktop fetchmail utility. When I replied from my desktop, the reply (as 
any other email set from my desktop to this list) was shown as "status=sent" 
from my mail.log, but it is not showing as being received.

My conclusion is that this group is not accepting emails from my desktop. That 
might mean that something in my IP address or domain/Reverse DNS is causing 
such a rejection. I currently receive and send to at least two dozen email 
lists, including ones that I maintain myself, including other google groups and 
more "traditional" mailman-based setups.

It would be so much more convenient if I could send email to this group from my 
desktop. I'd appreciate some help or commentary on this matter.

Note - my ISP is as follows:
mtaonline.net

Thanks
Tim

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[racket-users] Testing - mails sent from desktop mail client not received

[Tim Johnson]

I am sending this from my browser, pointed at 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!newtopic/racket-users as a test.

Although I have been receiving emails sent to the Racket Users email list 
(racket-users@googlegroups.com) as a subscriber, emails sent by me to the same 
list via my desktop email client do not appear to be received or distributed. 

This is a test.
thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[racket-users] syntax-class that is just a set of literals

[Dan Liebgold]

Hi, 

A couple questions regarding literals in syntax-parse:

First, I'm trying to define a syntax-class that is just a set of literals, and 
I'm wondering if there is a slightly better way that this: 

 * http://pasterack.org/pastes/86722

I'd just prefer to not repeat all the literal definitions.


Second, I'm wondering if it'd be possible to implement a #:datum-literal-set 
option for syntax-classes, as I'd like to also share a list of literals (that 
are not bound ids) among multiple classes.

Thanks,
Dan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.