[Radiant] Radiant Mailer Extension - Clarification on what needs to go into the SMTP settings

2012-12-26 Thread prism
Sorry this is really daft but I am confused as to what goes into the bolded 
fields:

 * :address = mail.domain.com,
  :domain = domain.com,*
  :port = 25,
*  :user_name = xx,
  :password = xx,*
  :authentication = :plain

I've tried various things for the address (mail.domain.com VS. 
smtp.domain.com), user_name, and pass and nothing happens when I hit send 
on the actual form.  Would the username and password be what I use to log 
into my webhosting account?  

Also for the config, I took off the # for the config.frameworks -= [].  Is 
that correct? or should the line read #config.frameworks -= []?

For this example from another thread:
ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings = {
  :address = mail.x.com,
  :domain = allanmacgregor.com,
  :port = 25,
  :user_name = x,
  :password = x,
  :authentication = :plain
}

Why is the mail.x.com blocked out? Wouldn't it be 
mail.allanmacgregor.com?

Thank you for anyone to can provide some assistance.   I'm sorry if this 
seems ridiculously simple to set up but I honestly don't understand where I 
am going wrong because nothing is happening when I click send. 



[Radiant] Having trouble getting to the login page after a successful install - also trying to use Radiant locally on WAMP

2012-09-27 Thread prism
I'm stuck on the Documentation page after creating the new site 
example_application.   Tried logging in using http://localhost:3000/ but 
there is no connection.  I did not edit the gemfile to change the database 
so I think everything is setup as default from the Documentation.  However, 
I am almost at the end of another documentation for setting Ruby on Rails 
on WAMP but last part of that setup isn't working so I don't know if that's 
why I have no connection on port 3000.

Troubleshooting so far... there's no public/.htaccess file created in 
C:/wamp/www/projects/RUBY/test after running a rails test so I can't 
continue with the rest of the documentation found here -- 
http://www.alexbernard.fr/fichiers/blog/Installer-Ruby-On-Rails-sur-un-Wamp-Server.pdf.
 
  Not sure how to proceed from this point with the rest of the Install 
Rails on WAMP documentation.  I was thinking the next step would have been 
to configure the gemfile to use Apache instead of Thin?  Sorry if the 
WAMP-Apache problem is off-topic as I know this is a Radiant CMS group.

Can someone please point me in the right direction or advise on what I 
could be doing better or more correct with this install (I use strictly 
WAMP)  why I can't access the login page?  Another concern I have is how 
different the installation process will be when setting up Radiant at the 
hosting service.   Are there any pitfalls with doing this locally that I 
should be aware of?  

Thank you.



[Radiant] having trouble with accessing the login page @ http://localhost:3000/ - finished with the install on Windows XP

2012-09-27 Thread prism
I am installing Radiant on Windows XP,   the database is the default 
sqlite3, and Ruby/Rails files are installed onto WAMP.
The new site from the documentation 'example_application' is installed in 
c/wamp/www/ and the folder seems to be populated with all the necessary 
folders/files.
 

I'm assuming Rails is correctly installed because when I access 
http://localhost:3000/, I at least get the Welcome to Rails message.  
However, that means it's not loading the site page (should be the blank 
template?) when accessing localhost:3000.   

I am going by these directions:
script/server -e production  - I ran this as the last step in the install

I go to:
http://localhost:3000 - getting the Welcome to Rails Page
http://localhost:3000/admin - getting the below Error message
Routing Error 

No route matches [GET] /admin

 Try running rake routes for more information on available routes. 

-- I also tried binding Webrick to 127.0.0.1 -- didn't work (maybe this is 
a possible fix?)

Also, I know that Rails is not meant for a Windows environment so please 
bear with me.  I apologize if there is already a logical fix 
somewhere/thread available in this group.  I was previously looking for 
solutions at StackOverflow and found a few threads but no fix.  

Thanks if anyone can advise.