[RDA-L] Revised JSC documents posted
The following documents have been posted on the JSC website ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/ALA/23/rev [Revision proposal for RDA instructions on treaties] -- 6JSC/RDA/Editor's guide/rev/2 and two appendices Regards, Judy Kuhagen Secretary, JSC To unsubscribe from RDA-L send an e-mail to the following address from the address you are subscribed under to: lists...@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca In the body of the message: SIGNOFF RDA-L
[RDA-L] 2014-2015 JSC Chair: Gordon Dunsire
Gordon Dunsire is the 2014-2015 Chair of the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. See the announcement ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/jscnewchairdunsire.html) on the JSC website. Regards, Judy Kuhagen Secretary, JSC
[RDA-L] Additional documents from JSC meeting
The follow-up documents listed below, based on discussions at the November 2013 JSC meeting, are available on the public website ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/3/JSC response 6JSC/BL/13/LC follow-up Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Deadlines reminder
Dear JSC, Because there are so many deadlines floating around in emails, Gordon agreed that I should send a listing of current deadlines. I'll update the list via email as deadlines are added. The list below includes dates from the 2013 meeting actions table plus dates assigned after the meeting via emails. It doesn't include any of my tasks related to editing for the February release. Let me know if I've omitted any deadlines or given incorrect information. FYI: Five of the more complicated proposals requiring additional work now have Jan. 10-13 deadlines. With only a few days between those deadlines and my Jan. 15 deadline to send you the Sec final drafts, the Sec final drafts for those five proposals may not be ready by that Jan. 15 deadline. Regards, Judy = = = = = ?? -- remaining draft JSC responses to EURIG documents: Alan Nov. 29 -- example for 9.19.1.2: Examples Group Nov. 30 -- protocol for synchronization between JSC and ISBD RG: Gordon Nov. 30 -- comments on latest draft of Policy/1: JSC reps Nov. 30 -- revised draft of Editor's Guide to JSC: Judy Nov. 30 -- report to JSC on comparison of scope statements in ch. 25-28 with glossary definitions: Judy Nov. 30 -- listing to JSC of glossary terms with parenthetical qualifiers: Judy Nov. 30 -- information to JSC about unresolved vocabulary terms/definitions: Judy Dec. 1 -- report to JSC on comparison of wording in D.1.2: Judy Dec. 1 -- contact with ALA TF on places about being involved in JSC WG on places: Kathy Dec. 3 -- comments on Fast Track entries: JSC reps Dec. 3 -- comments on draft of initial Outcomes announcement: JSC reps Dec. 6 -- comments on terms of reference for ROF Working Group: JSC reps Dec. 6 -- comments on general terms of reference document: JSC reps Dec. 7 -- comments on draft JSC response to the ISBD RG response involving ISBD/Discussion 1 and 2: JSC reps Dec. 8 -- comments on draft annual report: JSC reps Dec. 15 -- examples for variant access points (ALA/24): Examples Group Dec. 15 -- information to Gordon about problems with definition of projected as a Media type: JSC reps Dec. 15 -- preparation of ALA/23/rev: Kathy Dec. 20 -- comments on terms of reference for places working group: JSC reps Dec. 31 -- nominations for working group on places: JSC reps Dec. 31 -- report to JSC on number vs. numeral in RDA: Judy Jan. 1 -- draft to JSC of final Outcomes announcement: Judy [JAK needs to discuss this deadline with Gordon because precedes deadline for comments on four follow-up documents and revision of ALA/23] Jan. 10 -- comments on CCC/11/follow-up: JSC reps Jan. 10 -- comments on final Outcomes document: JSC reps Jan. 13 -- comments on Music/3/follow-up: JSC reps Jan. 13 -- comments on BL/13/LC follow-up: JSC reps Jan. 13 -- probable deadline (not yet announced) for comments on ALA/23/rev: JSC reps Jan. 13 -- posting of new Fast Track entries for April Update in Fast Track log: JSC reps Jan. 15 -- distribution of Sec final document drafts for JSC review: Judy Jan. 15 -- revised draft of element analysis table: Judy Jan. 31 -- comments on Sec final document drafts: JSC reps Jan. 31 -- comments on revised draft of element analysis table: JSC reps
[RDA-L] Apologies: deadline reminder
Dear RDA-L subscribers, I apologize to you for sending an internal JSC document to the RDA-L list. Please ignore this message. Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC Examples Group document
This discussion paper for the November 2013 JSC meeting is available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/Examples/Discussion/1 (Contextual examples in RDA) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Revision of RDA music proposal posted
This revised proposal for the November 2013 JSC meeting is available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/Music/2/rev/2 Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC response documents
The responses listed below for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/LC response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/Appendix D/LC response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] 2013 meeting of the JSC
A second revision of the agenda has been posted on the JSC website (( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): to move 6JSC/Chair/9 to topic #22 on Nov. 8. Deadline for indicating you'd like to be an observer at the public sessions of the JSC meeting in Washington, D.C. = October 28. please contact both the JSC Chair, *Barbara Tillett,* jscch...@rdatoolkit.org and the JSCSecretary, *Judy Kuhagen* jscsecret...@rdatoolkit.org, if you want to attend any of the sessions. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Discussion paper for JSC meeting
The discussion paper listed below for the November 2013 JSC meeting is available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html); written responses are not required. 6JSC/Chair/9 [Element Set Discussion (Notes on, Details of, Source Consulted, etc.)] Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC November 2013 meeting agenda
The *agenda for the November 2013 meeting*http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-A-3.pdfof the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) is now available. The JSC will meet November 4-8, 2013 in Washington, D.C., USA, at the American Library Association Washington Office building (1615 New Hampshire Avenue NW). Observers may attend the public sessions of the meeting. Because there is limited room for observers, please contact both the JSC Chair, *Barbara Tillett* jscch...@rdatoolkit.org and the JSC Secretary, *Judy Kuhagen*jscsecret...@rdatoolkit.org, if you want to attend any of the sessions. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] ISBD discussion paper for JSC meeting
The following ISBD discussion paper (2 files) for the November 2013 JSC meeting is available on the public website ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/3 [ISBD Profile in RDA: Constructing Functionally Interoperable Core Records] 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/3/Profile Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Additional JSC responses and a revised JSC document
The following responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/BL response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/CILIP response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/Appendix/D/BL response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/DNB response The following revised JSC document (in 6 files due to changes in paper size) is also available on the public website; responses are not required before the discussion of the document at the November 2013 JSC meeting. 6JSC/ALA rep/1/rev (Revisions to *Categorization of Content and Carrier*) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] CCC and DNB responses to JSC documents
The following CCC and DNB responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ACOC/7/DNB response 6JSC/ACOC/8/DNB response 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/23/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/25/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3/DNB response 6JSC/BL/10/CCC response 6JSC/BL/10/DNB response 6JSC/BL/11/CCC response 6JSC/BL/12/rev/CCC response 6JSC/BL/12/rev/DNB response 6JSC/BL/13/CCC response 6JSC/BL/14/rev/CCC response 6JSC/BL/14/rev/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/11/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/12/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/14/DNB response 6JSC/Chair/8/DNB response 6JSC/DNB/1/CCC response 6JSC/DNB/2/CCC response 6JSC/DNB/3/CCC response 6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5/DNB response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/CCC response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/Appendix/D/CCC response 6JSC/LC/23/CCC response 6JSC/LC/23/DNB response 6JSC/LC/24/CCC response 6JSC/LC/24/DNB response 6JSC/LC/25/rev/CCC response 6JSC/LC/25/rev/DNB response 6JSC/LC/26/CCC response 6JSC/LC/26/DNB response 6JSC/LC rep/4/CCC response 6JSC/Music/3/DNB response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] ACOC, ALA, BL, and CCC responses to JSC documents
The following ACOC, ALA, BL, and CCC responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ACOC/7/BL response 6JSC/ACOC/7/CCC response 6JSC/ACOC/8/BL response 6JSC/ACOC/8/CCC response 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev/BL response 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/22/BL response 6JSC/ALA/22/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/23/BL response 6JSC/ALA/23/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/24/BL response 6JSC/ALA/24/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/25/BL response 6JSC/ALA/25/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/26/BL response 6JSC/ALA/26/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1//BL response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2/BL response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3/BL response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/BL response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/CCC response 6JSC/CCC/11/BL response 6JSC/CCC/12/BL response 6JSC/CCC/13/BL response 6JSC/CCC/14/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/14/BL response 6JSC/Chair/8/BL response 6JSC/Chair/8/CCC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/BL response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/CCC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/5/CCC response 6JSC/DNB/1/BL response 6JSC/DNB/2/BL response 6JSC/DNB/3/ALA response 6JSC/DNB/3/BL response 6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1/BL response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/BL response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/BL response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/BL response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5/BL response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/ALA response 6JSC/LC/23/BL response 6JSC/LC/24/BL response 6JSC/LC/25/rev/BL response 6JSC/LC/26/BL response 6JSC/LC rep/4/BL response 6JSC/Music/1/BL response 6JSC/Music/1/CCC response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/BL response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/CCC response 6JSC/Music/3/ALA response 6JSC/Music/3/BL response 6JSC/Music/3/CCC response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] ACOC and CILIP responses to JSC proposals
The following ACOC and CILIP responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html ): 6JSC/ACOC/8/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/22/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/24/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/25/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/26/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/11/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/14/CILIP response 6JSC/Chair/8/CILIP response 6JSC/DNB/1/CILIP response 6JSC/DNB/2/CILIP response 6JSC/Discussion/1/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/DIscussion/5/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/23/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/24/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/25/rev/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/26/CILIP response 6JSC/LC rep/4/CILIP response 6JSC/Music/1/CILIP response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/CILIP response 6JSC/Music/3/CILIP response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] ALA responses to JSC proposals
The following ALA responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/Chair/8/ALA response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/ALA response 6JSC/DNB/2/ALA response 6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5/ALA response 6JSC/LC rep/4/ALA response 6JSC/Music/1/ALA response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] ACOC and DNB responses to JSC proposals
The following ACOC and DNB responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ALA/22/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/24/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/24/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/25/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/26/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/26/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/DNB response 6JSC/BL/11/DNB response 6JSC/BL/13/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/13/DNB response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/DNB response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/ACOC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/1/ACOC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/2/ACOC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/3/ACOC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/4/ACOC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/5/ACOC response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/DNB response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/ACOC response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/Appendix D/ACOC response 6JSC/ISSN/2/JSC response/ISSN response/DNB response 6JSC/LC rep/4/ACOC response 6JSC/LC rep/4/DNB response 6JSC/Music/1/DNB response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC website: Additional ALA and LC responses to proposals
The following ALA and LC responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ACOC/8/LC response 6JSC/ALA/22/LC response 6JSC/ALA/23/LC response 6JSC/ALA/25/LC response 6JSC/ALA/26/LC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1/LC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2/LC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3/LC response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/LC response 6JSC/BL/10/ALA response 6JSC/BL/10/LC response 6JSC/BL/13/LC response 6JSC/BL/14/rev/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/11/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/11/LC response 6JSC/CCC/12/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/14/LC response 6JSC/Chair/8/LC response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/LC response 6JSC/DNB/1/ALA response 6JSC/DNB/1/LC response 6JSC/DNB/2/LC response 6JSC/DNB/DIscussion/1/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5/LC response 6JSC/Music/1/LC response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/ALA response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/LC response 6JSC/Music/3/LC response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC website: more ALA responses
The following ALA responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ACOC/8/ALA response 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev/ALA response 6JSC/ALA rep/6/ALA response 6JSC/BL/12/rev/ALA response 6JSC/LC/24/ALA response 6JSC/LC/26/ALA response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC website: more ACOC responses
The following ACOC responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ALA/22/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/23/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2/ACOC response 6JSC/Chair/8/ACOC response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC website: ACOC responses
The following ACOC responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/DNB/2/ACOC response 6JSC/DNB/3/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/24/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/25/rev/ACOC response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC website: CILIP and LC responses
The following responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ACOC/7/CILIP response 6JSC/ACOC/7/LC response 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/23/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/24/LC response 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/10/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/11/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/11/LC response 6JSC/BL/12/rev/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/12/rev/LC response 6JSC/BL/13/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/14/rev/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/12/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/13/CILIP response 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/CILIP response 6JSC/DNB/3/CILIP response Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC website documents: ALA responses
The following ALA responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/ACOC/7/ALA response 6JSC/BL/11/ALA response 6JSC/BL/13/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/13/ALA response 6JSC/LC/23/ALA response 6JSC/LC/25/rev/ALA response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] More JSC responses on website
The following responses for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/BL/14/rev/ACOC response 6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/23/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/26/ACOC response 6JSC/Music/1/ACOC response 6JSC/Music/2/rev/ACOC response 6JSC/Music/3/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/14/rev/LC response 6JSC/CCC/13/LC response 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev/LC response [posted earlier but omitted in announcement] Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] More JSC documents on website
The following documents for the November 2013 JSC meeting are available on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/CCC/12/LC response 6JSC/DNB/3/LC response 6JSC/LC/25/rev Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Unknown date
Gary, If supplying a date per 1.9.2 is not possible, then you can apply the 2nd paragraph of 2.8.6.6: If an approximate date of publication for a single-part resource cannot reasonably be determined, record *date of publication not identified*. Indicate that the information was taken from a source outside the resource itself (see 2.2.4). Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote: Gary, The rules which you need can be found in 1.9.2 (Supplied date). Under 1.9.2.4 (Probable range of years) there are examples like this: [between 1800 and 1899?] [between 1400 and 1600?] In 2.8.6.6, there is a reference to 1.9.2. Heidrun On 13.08.2013 21:19, Gary Oliver wrote: I have searched the Toolkit and can not locate instructions for a situation like this one. If a manifestation has no date of any kind, how is that recorded? There are no dates associated with the author, so I do not have either an earliest or latest possible year. I would say that based on the condition of the piece, I am able to assume a century. Thank you, Gary Oliver Abilene Christian University -- - Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A. Stuttgart Media University Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
[RDA-L] Announcement of RDA proposals, etc.; posting of updated proposal
This announcement has been posted on the JSC website: The proposals, discussion papers, etc., related to revision and development of RDA from the JSC constituencies and others have been submitted for discussion at the November 4-8, 2013 JSC meeting in Washington, D.C., USA. A *table of the documents*http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/2013-JSC-meeting-documents-table.pdfis available for your use. The documents are posted in the *constituency proposals section*http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html#constituencyof this web site. JSC responses to the documents will be posted by early October. Constituency responses to the new proposals are due October 5, 2013. To see the documents and responses, go to the beginning of each constituency's listing in the constituency proposals section and click on the document links. = = = = = Also posted on the website is 6JSC/ACOC/9/rev, updated to correct an example. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: additional proposals
I've just posted the following proposals for the November 2013 JSC meeting on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/ACOC/7 (Compilers and editors of compilations – Amendments to RDA 20.2.1) -- 6JSC/ACOC/8 (Addition of the Copyright holder relationship - Amendments to RDA 21.6.1.1 and Appendix I) -- 6JSC/ACOC/9 (Qualifications after an identifier - Amendments to RDA 2.15.1.7) -- 6JSC/BL/14/rev (Revision of RDA 11.13.1.8.20) [replaces 6JSC/BL/14 withdrawn earlier by BL] Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Difference between Introduction and Preface
You can choose the higher-level designator writer of supplementary textual content if you don't want to or cannot identify a more specific relationship. Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Mary Mastraccio ma...@marcive.com wrote: ** Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote: Sometimes I think RDA makes too many distinctions. It would be far more sensible to have only one relationship designator covering writers of things like prefaces, introductions, forewords and afterwords. Then we wouldn't have to wreck our brains about the differences. Writer of added text would do the trick, if it wasn't restricted to primarily non-textual work. I agree!! Mary L. Mastraccio Cataloging Authorities Manager MARCIVE, Inc. San Antonio, TX 78265 1-800-531-7678
[RDA-L] JSC website: new and replacement document
I've just posted the following document for the November 2013 JSC meeting on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/ALA rep/6 (Note on manifestation and item) I've replaced the pdf for 6JSC/Music/3 with a different file; the number of pages is different although the content is the same. The vertical marks for alternatives, exceptions, etc., are in the correct positions in the replacement file. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: new proposal; change in listing of documents
The following document for the November 2013 JSC meeting has been posted on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/Music/3 (Proposed revisions for medium of performance (RDA 6.15.1, 6.28.1.9, 6.28.1.10, and Appendix E.1.1)) On the web site listing of documents by constituency ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html), the documents for each constituency are now divided into two groups: first Documents for 2013 JSC meeting and then Earlier documents. Clicking on the link there will take you to the page where each document is posted and where responses to the document are or will be posted. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: additional discussion papers
I've posted the following discussion papers for the November 2013 JSC meeting on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/2 (Illustrative content and other augmentations: Discussion Paper -- 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/3 (Compilations of Works: Discussion paper) -- 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/4 (Representing date of works and expressions in RDA: Discussion Paper) -- 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/5 (Representing language of expressions in RDA: Discussion Paper) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Additional documents for JSC meeting
The following documents for the November 2013 JSC meeting have been posted on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/ALA/25 (RDA Appendix K Revision and Expansion) -- 6JSC/ALA/26 (Colour Content (RDA 7.17)) -- 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/3 (Instructions for Recording Relationships: Discussion Paper) -- 6JSC/CCC/11 (Revision of RDA 2.3.1.7 (Titles of Parts, Sections, and Supplements) and RDA 2.3.2.6 (Collective Title and Titles of Individual Contents)) -- 6JSC/CCC/12 (Revision of Appendix D regarding capitalization practice) -- 6JSC/CCC/13 (Revision of RDA 1.7.3 (Punctuation)) -- 6JSC/CCC/14 (Revision of RDA 3.5.3 (Dimensions of still images)) -- 6JSC/LC rep/4 (Treatment of Choreographic Works in RDA) Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] August 1 additions to JSC web site
I've posted the following additional proposals for the November 2013 JSC meeting on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/LC/24 (Revisions to instructions for production, publication, distribution and manufacture statements (2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10)) -- 6JSC/LC/25 (Recording dates in more than one calendar (RDA 2.6.7.1, 2.6.9.1, 2.7.6.3, 2.8.6.3, 2.9.6.3, 2.10.6.3)) Also posted is the document listed below (I omitted it in error earlier): -- 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response/Appendix D [ISBD Review Group response to JSC Response to the two Discussion Papers from the ISBD Review Group - Appendix D] Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: additional documents posted
I've posted the following additional documents for the November 2013 JSC meeting on the public web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/BL/11 (Revision of RDA 11.4 and 11.13 and Glossary) 6JSC/LC/23 (Language of the Family (10.8)) 6JSC/LC/26 (Changes to instructions on liturgical works (6.30.1.5)) 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 2/JSC response/ISBDRG response (ISBD Review Group response to JSC Response to the two Discussion Papers from the ISBD Review Group) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: update on 2013 proposals
These revised proposals have been posted ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/BL/12/rev (Revision of RDA 11.7 and 11.13) -- to add information -- 6JSC/Music/2/rev (Proposed revision to instruction 6.14.2.5, Preferred Title Consisting Solely of the Name of One Type of Composition) -- to correct an RDA instruction number The British Library has withdrawn 6JSC/BL/14. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site additions: DNB proposals and discussion paper
DNB documents have been posted on the JSC site ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): Proposals: -- 6JSC/DNB/1 [Parts of the Bible: Books (RDA 6.23.2.9.2)] -- 6JSC/DNB/2 [Larger place – Revision of RDA 16.2.2.4 (Recording the Preferred Name); 16.2.2; 16.2.2.9.1; 16.2.2.9.2; 16.2.2.10; 16.2.2.10.1; 16.2.2.11; 16.2.2.11.1; 16.2.2.12; 16.2.2.13; 16.2.2.14] -- 6JSC/DNB/3 [Attributes of manifestations: Instructions for more than one instance of an element] Discussion paper: -- 6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1 [[Discussion paper: First issue v. latest (current) issue] Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] July 9 Update.
I'm checking with ALA Publishing about the disappearance of the revision history icons. Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Bill Walker wal...@amigos.org wrote: Colleagues, Right after the July 9 update there were blue boxes with 2013/7 next to changed instructions in the RDA Toolkit. I am now looking at Chapter 11 in both the current and archived views. The archived view has a lengthy paragraph listing the changes done to the chapter, but the current view has no blue boxes with 2013/7. Can anyone please tell me why they have disappeared? Thanks in advance, Bill Walker Imaging Field Services Officer Amigos Library Services 14400 Midway Road, Dallas, TX 75007-3509 800-843-8482 x2853 972-340-2853 (direct) 972-991-6061 (fax) www.amigos.org Email: wal...@amigos.org
[RDA-L] JSC web site: additional proposals, etc., for November meeting
More documents have been posted on the JSC site ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): Proposals: -- 6JSC/ALA/23 [Revision proposal for RDA instructions for treaties] -- 6JSC/ALA/24 [Variant title as access point (RDA 6.27.4.1, 6.28.4.1, 6.29.3.1, 6.30.5.1, 6.31.3.1)] -- 6JSC/BL/10 [Revision of 9.8.1.3, 9.9.1.3, 9.10.1.3, 9.11.1.3, 10.5.1.3, 11.3.1.3, 11.13.1.3, 16.2.2.4, 16.2.2.9.2, B.1, B.11 to eliminate use of abbreviations for places] -- 6JSC/BL/12 [Revision of RDA 11.7 and 11.13] -- 6JSC/BL/13 [Revision of RDA 9.6] -- 6JSC/BL/14 [Revision of RDA 11.13.1.8] http://www.rda-jsc.org/working2.html#ccc -- 6JSC/Chair/8 [Proposals for Subject Relationships] Discussion papers: -- 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/1 [Machine-Actionable Data Elements in RDA: Discussion Paper (2013)] -- 6JSC/ALA/Discussion/2 [Treatment of Subjects in RDA] Update: -- 6JSC/ISSN/2/JSC response/ISSN response Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Additional proposals for JSC 2013 meeting
The proposals listed below have been posted on the JSC web site ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): 6JSC/CILIP rep/3 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/1 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/2 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/3 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/4 6JSC/CILIP rep/3/Appendix/5 6JSC/Music/1 6JSC/Music/2 Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] New member of JSC: Kathy Glennan
Kathy Glennan joined the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) on July 1, 2013. She replaced John Attig as the representative of the American Library Association. See the announcement (http://www.rda-jsc.org/news.html) for more information. Judy Kuhagen, JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: new documents
Two documents have been posted on the JSC web site ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/ALA/22 (the first proposal for the November 2013 JSC meeting; proposal deadline is August 5); -- 6JSC/Sec/9 (Fast Track minor changes and corrections appearing in the July 9 Update of the RDA Toolkit). Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] 2.20.13.3.3
Dana, RDA 2.20.13.3.3 applies only if the condition at 2.20.13 applies: In some cases, the identification of a multipart monograph or a serial is not based on the first released issue or part (see 2.1.2.3). When this occurs, make a note identifying the issue or part used as the basis for the identification. Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Dana Van Meter vanme...@ias.edu wrote: ** I have a question about Rule 2.20.13.3.3 for multipart monographs, which states: “*Make a note identifying the part of a multipart monograph on which the identification of the resource is based and/or its number or publication date, as appropriate. If more than one part has been consulted, make a separate note identifying the latest part consulted in making the description*.” I’ve only come across RDA cataloging copy for one multipart monograph thus far, and there is no such note present in the record. The multipart monograph I found the RDA multipart record for had only one volume, the first, published thus far. As this is the case, I’m wondering if this note isn’t necessary when you are cataloging a multipart monograph with the first volume in hand, and only one volume has been published thus far. I wish this rule was more specific than “as appropriate”. I’m just wondering how people are, or will be, interpreting this rule. Will you add a Description based on note when cataloging a multipart with the first volume in hand, and when only one volume has been published? (And I’m assuming we’ll be using the 588 note for this?). Likewise, will you add a Latest volume consulted note each time you add a new volume to the contents of the multipart? Thanks for your feedback. Dana Van Meter Cataloging Librarian Historical Studies-Social Science Library Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 vanme...@ias.edu
Re: [RDA-L] 2.20.13.3.3
The instruction only calls for an additional note for the latest issue consulted, not for every issue consulted. So, if you follow the instruction as written, you'd update the note each time you added a volume and either confirmed that no elements in the description have changed or you've added information about new, deleted, or changed elements. Applying this aspect would also be a matter either of cataloging policy or cataloger judgment; that note is not core in RDA. There is an LC-PCC policy statement for that instruction. Judy On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Dana Van Meter vanme...@ias.edu wrote: Ugh, should have scrolled up. Rookie mistake! Thanks Judy. Would you add a Latest issue consulted note each time you add a new volume, and if so, would this include when you add the last volume and close out the record? ** ** Thanks for your patience! ** ** -Dana ** ** *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *JSC Secretary *Sent:* Thursday, June 27, 2013 3:40 PM *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] 2.20.13.3.3 ** ** Dana, RDA 2.20.13.3.3 applies only if the condition at 2.20.13 applies: In some cases, the identification of a multipart monograph or a serial is not based on the first released issue or part (see 2.1.2.3). When this occurs, make a note identifying the issue or part used as the basis for the identification. Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Dana Van Meter vanme...@ias.edu wrote:* *** I have a question about Rule 2.20.13.3.3 for multipart monographs, which states: “*Make a note identifying the part of a multipart monograph on which the identification of the resource is based and/or its number or publication date, as appropriate. If more than one part has been consulted, make a separate note identifying the latest part consulted in making the description*.” I’ve only come across RDA cataloging copy for one multipart monograph thus far, and there is no such note present in the record. The multipart monograph I found the RDA multipart record for had only one volume, the first, published thus far. As this is the case, I’m wondering if this note isn’t necessary when you are cataloging a multipart monograph with the first volume in hand, and only one volume has been published thus far. I wish this rule was more specific than “as appropriate”. I’m just wondering how people are, or will be, interpreting this rule. Will you add a Description based on note when cataloging a multipart with the first volume in hand, and when only one volume has been published? (And I’m assuming we’ll be using the 588 note for this?). Likewise, will you add a Latest volume consulted note each time you add a new volume to the contents of the multipart? Thanks for your feedback. Dana Van Meter Cataloging Librarian Historical Studies-Social Science Library Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 vanme...@ias.edu ** **
[RDA-L] JSC web site: two new documents
Dear colleagues, Two documents were posted on the JSC web site ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/RDA element analysis table/rev -- updated to match changes to appear in the July 2013 Update of the RDA Toolkit: change from Transmission speed to Encoded bitrate; change from Place of residence to Place of residence, etc.; deletion of element sub-types Layout of cartographic images, Layout of tactile musical notation, and Layout of tactile text -- 6JSC/Chair/7 [Information for new JSC representatives] Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Revised documents on JSC web site
The revised documents listed below have been posted on the JSC web site; additional instructions or additional references affected by these approved proposals were discovered during the editing process for the July 2013 Update of the RDA Toolkit. 6JSC/ACOC/6/Sec final/rev 6JSC/ALA/7/Sec final/rev 6JSC/ALA/18/Sec final/rev 6JSC/LC/10/Sec final/rev/2 6JSC/LC/20/Sec final/rev 6JSC/LC/21/Sec final/rev/2 Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid fas track relahave a good example of a DVD + Book RDA
On May 24, 2013 6:45 PM, Dana Van Meter vanme...@ias.edu wrote: This answer prompts some questions for me. 1. Are we allowed to use, then, the more specific terms indented underneath the relationship designator performer (which is in bold), or are we to use performer only, to cover all those types of situations represented by the more specific indented not in bold terms? If we can use the more specific indented terms, how were we supposed to know that? I wasn't sure if we are allowed to use these indented terms, or if they're just further (and more specific) examples of what is meant by the bold faced code. If we can use these more specific indented terms, I think it might be helpful if RDA specifically said that following the definition of a bold faced term (or you can use these more specific terms, or something to that effect). Using the example of the term author, I see that there are MARC relator codes for the more specific terms librettist[lbt] and lyricist [lyr], but there isn't a MARC code for screenwriter, so I would not automatically assume that I could use those more specific indented terms as relator terms in a |e. There also seem to be MARC relator codes for terms which are not named in RDA, such as Music copyist [mcp]. Are we able to use relationship designators or terms such as music copyist in a |e if they have a MARC 3-letter code, even if the term does not appear in RDA? 2. I have a print series which contains lectures, can |e performer be used for lecturers/speakers when the lecture is in print form? Thank you for your help. Dana Van Meter Catalog Librarian Historical Studies-Social Science Library Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 vanme...@ias.edu -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2013 12:10 AM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record? From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Browning, Sommer [sommer.brown...@ucdenver.edu] Sent: April-05-13 5:21 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] Can Lecturer be used as a valid relator term and do you have a good example of a DVD + Book RDA record? I've searched the list and couldn't find if these questions had been asked before so here goes. 1. We are cataloging a Great Courses DVD and course guide. We have the lecturer and course guide author in the 100 field. What should his relator term be? Is $e creator sufficient? Though he isn't the creator of the DVD.? He is a kind of performer and author.? Using $e lecturer seems silly. The presence in the 100 field also would mean that the name would form part of the authorized access point for the work, but this is not appropriate for moving image works (Great Courses DVDs are cataloged primarily as moving image DVD videos, with the course guide being accompanying material). For moving images works, only the preferred title for the DVD is used alone for the authorized access point for the work (RDA 6.27.1.3), so the lecturer would not be found in the 100 field. As a lecturer, the person would be contributing to the expression, essentially as a 'performer'. In the list of designators under 'performer' are 'speaker' or 'teacher'. The designator ' speaker' is the best fit, as RDA refers specifically to the delivery of a lecture (as opposed to a 'teacher' who is providing instructions or a demonstration). The lecturer is also the writer of the course guide, so that is a clear work relationship. Instead of a contributor to the expression, the lecturer is the Creator of a work, specifically an 'author.' Adding these two designators to the lecturer in 700 field would be the best fit for the two roles: $e speaker $e author 2. Related note: Can the relationship designator just be left off entirely? Yes, but the person would not be found in the 100 field because the description is primarily for a moving image work. A name in a 700 field can have designators supporting relationships to works or expressions in the resource, but the 100 field is reserved for allowable names that can form part of the authorized access point for the work. Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library
Re: [RDA-L] RDA Update History
There are two categories of changes in the RDA content of the RDA Toolkit: -- updates: major changes resulting from approved proposals to the JSC; -- releases: minor changes resulting from corrections and Fast Track entries handled by the JSC. So far, there has been only one update of the RDA content in April 2012 for proposals from the November 2011 meeting of the JSC. The next update will be in July 2013 for proposals from the November 2012 meeting of the JSC. The revision history in the Toolkit applies only* to updates. The final versions of the approved proposals are posted on the JSC web site as Sec final documents in the proposal series (see the specific proposals on the JSC web site). Documentation of minor changes issued as releases and minor changes in the updates are in the Sec document series. I post and then announce on RDA-L the Sec document for each release; the document listing the minor changes for the May 2013 release is 6JSC/Sec/8 ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-Sec-8.pdf). Earlier minor changes are documented in Sec/2, Sec/3, Sec/4, Sec/5, and Sec/7. No instructions have been renumbered since the April 2012 Update; some will be renumbered in the July 2013 Update. Judy K. * Including minor changes such as correction of punctuation, change from bold to italic, correction of typo in one word, etc., in the revision history would definitely add to the complexity of that record. Minor changes such as clarifying wording, adding an example, adding a glossary term, etc., are included for your reference in the Sec document series. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Dana Van Meter vanme...@ias.edu wrote: I also happened to notice that yesterday Kevin, and I'm glad you bring it up. The latest update was to be May 14th, and I even received an e-mail from the Toolkit on May 13th announcing the May 14th update, but my Toolkit also shows the latest update as April 2012. However I do notice that when you're in RDA itself, if you scroll all the way down to the bottom of a page it says: Document Date: 5/14/2013, so it would appear as if the text of RDA has been updated, I'm not sure why the Toolkit hasn't updated the Update History. But then again the Toolkit does a lot of things I don't understand, like not providing the Index to AACR2, and not having the LC-PCC PS icon print out if you print out an RDA rule. Dana Van Meter HS-SS Library Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 vanme...@ias.edu -Original Message- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:45 PM To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: [RDA-L] RDA Update History The RDA Update History seems not to be complete. Haven't there been several updates to the content since it was published in June 2010? There is only one update in the Update History, and that is dated April 2012. It is *very* helpful to have a complete history of the updates, to help catalogers determine if there was an actual change in a particular instruction, or when instruction numbers have changed, etc. Will this section of the RDA Toolkit be augmented with all of the histories for updates that have occurred to date? Thanks. Kevin M. Randall Principal Serials Cataloger Northwestern University Library k...@northwestern.edu (847) 491-2939 Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!
Re: [RDA-L] More than one mode of issuance?
Other possibilities:
-- a description for a monograph that is updated by an annual volume
without its own separate title;
-- a serial having one issue each year that is an updating loose-leaf
Judy Kuhagen
JSC Secretary
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Adam Schiff asch...@u.washington.eduwrote:
LC-PCC PS for 0.0:
Supplementary Materials
LC practice: Create separate records for a main work and a supplementary
work if the supplementary work is not issued at the same time as the main
work, or if it shows important differences in titles or statements of
responsibility from those appearing in the main work.
Also, catalog separately all supplements, etc., to serials except for:
1. Indexes, and
2. Supplements, etc., that have titles that are more like descriptions
than true titles, or because the supplement, etc., is usable only in
conjunction with the main work.
Relate separately cataloged supplements, etc., to the main work following
the guidelines in Chapter 25 (Related works).
Serial Supplements to Other Serials
LC practice/PCC practice: Create a separate bibliographic record for a
serial supplement to another serial if the supplement does not update that
related serial and carries its own designation system that is distinct and
independent from that used by the related serial. Give a MARC 772 field for
the related serial. In addition, provide an authorized access point for the
related serial unless the supplement has a common title that is identical
to the title proper of the related serial. On the bibliographic record for
the related serial, give a MARC 770 field for the supplement.
Other serial supplements should be noted on the bibliographic records for
the related serials. Provide access points for the supplement whenever the
titles are distinctive.
Indexes to Serials
LC practice/PCC practice: Generally indicate the presence of an index to a
serial on the bibliographic record for the serial being indexed. If,
however, the index is published separately and is not issued by the entity
responsible for the serial being indexed, create a separate bibliographic
record (monograph or serial as appropriate) for the index. Create a
separate bibliographic record also whenever the index covers two or more
different serials. (A serial represented by one or more descriptions (see
RDA 1.6.2) is regarded as one serial.)
-Original Message- From: J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 1:28 PM
To: asch...@u.washington.edu
Cc: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] More than one mode of issuance?
Sdam said regarding multiple modes:
Perhaps a single unit with supplementary volumes?
enember dash entries?
Don't we now do separate records? Has that changed with
RDA?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \_**_
Re: [RDA-L] Abridging statement of responsibility
Jim, The element being discussed is the Statement of responsibility relating to title proper (RDA 2.4.2). So, before you get to this element, you have already selected the title proper. Then, you follow 2.4.2.4: If a statement of responsibility relating to title proper appears on the source of information in more than one language or script, record the statement in the language or script of the title proper. If this criterion does not apply, record the statement that appears first. Also, I agree that if it takes too much time to decide which is first, I'd go beyond the core requirement (the first) and give all. My personal opinion is that giving all statements in different languages/scripts is important because the cataloger cannot know which will most serve which user. Judy On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:15 AM, James Agenbroad jjagenbr...@aol.comwrote: Dear Judy, Since retiring in 2003 I have not been closely following discussions of RDA. It seems to me that in some cases first statement of responsibility will be difficult or impossible to ascertain. I do not think it is far-fetched it imagine: 1. A bilingual text with one right-to-left language (e.g. Hebrew, Arabic, Persian or Yiddish (sometimes called HAPI though several languages such as Urdu and Pushtu also use Arabic script)) and one left-to-right language (e.g. English, French, Russian, Greek, etc. 2. There is a title page at each end of the book. 3. Each contains a statement of responsibility, the author's name, in each language *on the same line.* How can one determine which is the first statement of responsibility? One might try to determine if one language is a translation of the other but some authors can write in several languages or it may not say. In such cases it might be best to say something along the lines of record the first statement of responsibility when it can be easily determined but give several when priority can not be easily determined. To me, recording the extra text would seem preferable to making catalogers search for a way to decide which is first. Regards, Jim Agenbroad ( jjagenb...@aol.com ) On May 10, 2013, at 11:21 AM, JSC Secretary wrote: Tom, One of the changes in the May 14 release of the RDA Toolkit will be a revision of the core statement at 2.4 to add information there that is now at 2.4.2: Statement of responsibility relating to title proper is a core element (if more than one, only the first recorded is required). Other statements of responsibility are optional. The core statement at 2.4.2 for the element Statement of responsibility relating to title proper says: If more than one statement of responsibility relating to title proper appears on the source of information, only the first recorded is required. The last paragraph of 2.4.2.3 says: If not all statements of responsibility appearing on the source or sources of information are being recorded, give preference to those identifying creators of the intellectual or artistic content. In case of doubt, record the first statement. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Meehan, Thomas t.mee...@ucl.ac.ukwrote: Dear all, This is a fairly novice question but one where I would welcome some clarification, especially as far as the RDA text goes. Apologies if this has been raised before (I’m sure it must have been). I am looking at a couple of contentious aspects of the statement of responsibility relating to the title proper where I think there are three areas that require some decision on policy: **1. **Which (or how many) statements of responsibility are to be regarded as core. **2. **Statements of responsibility naming more than three persons (2.4.1.5). **3. **Abridging statements of responsibility (2.4.1.4). ** ** It is the third one which confuses me most. The rule states “Transcribe a statement of responsibility in the form in which it appears on the source of information.” The examples that follow contain no titles (Mr, Dr, Earl) except those that would have been retained under AACR2 and no affiliations (…professor of History at the University of Biggleswade) at all. ** ** However, the Optional Omission beneath which says “Abridge a statement of responsibility only if it can be abridged without loss of essential information” has examples with all of this information in, e.g. “by Harry Smith // Source of information reads: by Dr. Harry Smith”. The option seems curiously vague about what can/should be omitted if the option is followed, and why. ** ** Is this basically a case of the examples of the main rule not catching up and so being illustrative of AACR2 rules rather than RDA? I notice, looking at the really helpful LC training materials and BL workflow, that the point is made more explicitly there so I think I am happy with what is intended, but I am uncomfortable having
Re: [RDA-L] Abridging statement of responsibility
Tom, One of the changes in the May 14 release of the RDA Toolkit will be a revision of the core statement at 2.4 to add information there that is now at 2.4.2: Statement of responsibility relating to title proper is a core element (if more than one, only the first recorded is required). Other statements of responsibility are optional. The core statement at 2.4.2 for the element Statement of responsibility relating to title proper says: If more than one statement of responsibility relating to title proper appears on the source of information, only the first recorded is required. The last paragraph of 2.4.2.3 says: If not all statements of responsibility appearing on the source or sources of information are being recorded, give preference to those identifying creators of the intellectual or artistic content. In case of doubt, record the first statement. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Meehan, Thomas t.mee...@ucl.ac.uk wrote: Dear all, This is a fairly novice question but one where I would welcome some clarification, especially as far as the RDA text goes. Apologies if this has been raised before (I’m sure it must have been). I am looking at a couple of contentious aspects of the statement of responsibility relating to the title proper where I think there are three areas that require some decision on policy: **1. **Which (or how many) statements of responsibility are to be regarded as core. **2. **Statements of responsibility naming more than three persons (2.4.1.5). **3. **Abridging statements of responsibility (2.4.1.4). ** ** It is the third one which confuses me most. The rule states “Transcribe a statement of responsibility in the form in which it appears on the source of information.” The examples that follow contain no titles (Mr, Dr, Earl) except those that would have been retained under AACR2 and no affiliations (…professor of History at the University of Biggleswade) at all. ** ** However, the Optional Omission beneath which says “Abridge a statement of responsibility only if it can be abridged without loss of essential information” has examples with all of this information in, e.g. “by Harry Smith // Source of information reads: by Dr. Harry Smith”. The option seems curiously vague about what can/should be omitted if the option is followed, and why. ** ** Is this basically a case of the examples of the main rule not catching up and so being illustrative of AACR2 rules rather than RDA? I notice, looking at the really helpful LC training materials and BL workflow, that the point is made more explicitly there so I think I am happy with what is intended, but I am uncomfortable having to interpret the meaning of a rule based on third party training and policy documentation, if that makes sense. ** ** Many thanks, ** ** Tom ** ** --- ** ** Thomas Meehan Head of Current Cataloguing Library Services University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT ** ** t.mee...@ucl.ac.uk ** **
[RDA-L] Annoucement of 2013 JSC meeting; revised documents posted
Dear colleagues, (1) JSC 2013 meeting: The 2013 meeting of the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) will be the week of November 4-9, 2013, in Washington, D.C., USA. The deadline for proposals for this November 2013 meeting is August 5, 2013. Proposals for revision of RDA instructions emanating from within the author countries of RDA should be submitted through their respective constituent bodies of JSC. Proposals for revision of RDA instructions emanating from outside the author countries of RDA should be submitted to *Barbara Tillett, Chair of the JSC*. jscch...@rdatoolkit.org Completed proposals are posted in the *constituency proposals section*http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html#constituencyof this web site as they are received. Constituency responses to the new proposals are due October 5, 2013. (2) Documents recently posted on the JSC web site to correct mis-numbering of sub-instructions in RDA 9.19: 6JSC/BL/3/Rev/Sec final/rev/2http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-BL-3-rev-Sec-final-rev-2.pdf 6JSC/BL/4/Sec final/revhttp://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-BL-4-Sec-final-rev.pdf 6JSC/LC/12/rev/Sec final/revhttp://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-LC-12-rev-Sec-final-rev.pdf Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: recent postings
(1) Recent documents posted to the JSC web site ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): -- 6JSC/BL/3/Rev/Sec final/rev -- 6JSC/LC/11/Sec final/rev -- 6JSC/Policy/3 [Duty statement for the JSC Secretary] The revisions to the Sec final documents for 6JSC/BL/3/Rev and for 6JSC/LC/11 adds information for 8.3 omitted in the original proposal by LC. (2) The announcement on the RDA Toolkit blog about the revised RDA Toolkit schedule was re-posted on the JSC web site (http://www.rda-jsc.org/news.html ). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Most appropriate language (RDA 1.4)
Note that RDA 0.11.2 has general information about language and script. Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote: Paul, RDA is actually quite clear on this matter. In this case (unlike the one I was talking about), it's not a complete element which is supplied, but only a part of it. The basic rule for this can also be found in 1.4 (Language and script): When adding data within an element listed above, record the added data in the language and script of the other data in the element unless the instructions for a specific element indicate otherwise. So, ordinarily it should be the same language as the rest of the element, but note the exception in the last part of the sentence. There is indeed a specific instruction for your case in 2.4.1.5 (Statement naming more than one person, etc.): Optional Omission: If a single statement of responsibility names more than three persons, families, or corporate bodies performing the same function, or with the same degree of responsibility, omit all but the first of each group of such persons, families, or bodies. Indicate the omission by summarizing what has been omitted in the language and script preferred by the agency preparing the description. Indicate that the summary was taken from a source outside the resource itself as instructed under 2.2.4. So, if the library in question has decided to use English as its preferred language, than the [and twelve others] or such also has to be in English. My personal explanation for this is that the [and twelve others] is seen rather as something like a note (which traditionally is recorded in the language of the agency), and not as a different way of transcribing the statement of responsibility. I'm not really happy with this language mixture myself. And it doesn't really fit in with a rule like 1.7.5 (Symbols): Replace symbols and other characters, etc., that cannot be reproduced by the facilities available with a description of the symbol enclosed in square brackets. Here, there is no specific instruction, so according to the rules you must describe the symbol in the language of the resource, although this will certainly often be difficult for catalogers. Maybe there should at least be an option in 2.4.1.5 to use the language of the resource instead of the language of the agency. Heidrun On 25.03.2013 13:30, Paul Davey wrote: I'm not quite sure if I'm talking about exactly the same issue, but this is something that is worrying me: (Also, I do apologise to be mentioning a MARC subfield, which I don't think purists like, but it's useful shorthand; also not to give the RDA rule number, but I don't have access to the Toolkit, but I'm sure readers will know what I mean) Assume I am cataloguing a record for a non-English language resource (in this case Finnish, but assume any language) but I am working for a library that wants records with English as language of cataloguing, ie value 040$b eng If I am creating a 245$c and I want to make use of the option that allows abbreviation to and twelve others what is the appropriate way of expressing that? [and twelve others] ? [ja kaksitoista muuta] ? The first must stick out like a sore thumb, and I wouldn't countenance it in the case of value 040$b fin, but I just don't know how to reconcile it with RDA 1.4. Paul Davey daveyp...@tiscali.co.uk In RDA 1.4, we read: When recording an element listed above as a supplied element, record the supplied element in the most appropriate language and script. (The elements listed are those that are normally transcribed more or less exactly in the bibliographic description.) Now I was wondering what might be a good policy for the most appropriate language. The LC-PCC PS for 1.4 doesn't comment on this point, although I think there can easily be different opinions as to what is most appropriate. For instance, according to AACR2 (1.4C6.), the probable place of publication, distribution etc. is to be given in the English form of name if there is one, whereas the German RAK rules (§ 144,3) call for giving such a place if possible, in its original language form. So, you'd have to use Florence according to AACR2, but Firenze according to RAK. The example given in AACR2 1.4C6. is [Munich?], and this example is still there in RDA 2.8.2.6.2. But taking into account that RDA examples are not prescriptive, but illustrative only, I think that RDA 1.4 would also make it possible to write [München?], if one believes the original language form to be the most appropriate. Heidrun -- - Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A. Stuttgart Media University Faculty of Information and Communication Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germanywww.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
[RDA-L] JSC public web site: recent postings
Two announcements have been posted on the JSC public web site: -- RDA Training Materials from JSC Constituencies (information from Australia, Canada, and the United States; information from Germany and the United Kingdom to be added later) -- New JSC members (Christine Frodl, Kevin Marsh, and Dave Reser) Several revised versions of Sec final documents for approved proposals have been posted (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html); the revisions have corrections of typographical errors and corrections to examples. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] National Library of Australia RDA training documentation
Posting the follow message on behalf of ACOC (the Australian Committee on Cataloguing) and Kevin Marsh, the ACOC representative to the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA: The training documentation used by the National Library of Australia for the RDA train-the-trainer courses held in late 2012 is now published on the ACOC Websitehttp://www.nla.gov.au/acoc/training-materials-for-resource-description-and-access . These training materials are freely available to be used by individuals or institutions for information, background or for use in training. * *These documents are available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia license. * *Use of these materials should be attributed as follows: “From (or adapted from) Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented by the National Library of Australia in 2012 and made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License.” = = = = = Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Question re: Reporting errors in the toolkit
Hi Ben, Yes, you can report errors by using that form. Select Content related. You can also send an email to me (jscsecret...@rdatoolkit.org). Judy Kuhagen On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse babra...@mit.eduwrote: I just want to double check that this is the appopriate place to report any errors we find in the RDA toolkit: ** ** http://www.rdatoolkit.org/support/open.php? ** ** The dropdown box Help topic does not seem to have an option for Report error or something similar. ** ** --Ben ** ** Benjamin Abrahamse Cataloging Coordinator Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems MIT Libraries 617-253-7137 ** **
[RDA-L] Recent postings on JSC web site
Documents posted recently on the public JSC web site are the following: (1) revisions of five Sec final documents to correct minor errors in examples: -- 6JSC/ALA/6/Sec final/rev -- 6JSC/ALA/11/Sec final/rev -- 6JSC/ALA/15/Sec final/rev -- 6JSC/LC/10/Sec final/rev -- 6JSC/LC/21/Sec final/rev (2) JSC responses to discussion papers: -- a response addressing both 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 and 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/2 -- 6JSC/ISSN/2/JSC response -- 6JSC/ISBD/3/JSC response (3) JSC response to 6JSC/IAML/1. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] 2012 approved RDA proposals: changes posted
The final versions of the proposals approved by the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA during and after its November 2012 meeting have been posted on the JSC web site. See the Sec final documents listed in the *table of new working documents*http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.htmlor consult a specific proposal in the *constituency proposals section*http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html#constituency. If you're interested in which instructions are affected by the approved proposals, a *table* http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/2012RDAchanges.pdf is available for your use. It lists the new, revised, or deleted instructions and indicates where changes were made (in the instruction, in the examples, or both); it also includes the JSC document number if you want to read the background and justification for the changes. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Statement of responsibility naming more than three persons etc.
Dear RDA-L people, After an email conversation with Barbara, I'm writing with some additional information, making the distinction between transcribing information in a statement of responsibility and giving authorized access points for responsible entities. [Barbara is traveling and typing long messages on her phone is not easy.) RDA doesn't say you can choose what you give in the statement of responsibility for the title proper. The basic instruction is to transcribe the complete statement. The optional omission at 2.4.1.5 is the AACR2 rule: if more than three, record the first and then a summarizing phrase. However, you can choose which entities to include in 7XX authorized access points in a MARC bibliographic record; those access points do not need to be justified in a transcribed element or by a note. Also, as Barbara wrote, a change to RDA can be proposed to the JSC. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Barbara Tillett babstill...@me.com wrote: You are right the rules do not specifically say you can do it, but it is definitely in the spirit of RDA and perhaps you'd like to work with Christine Frodl to propose an adjustment to the way RDA states this? - Barbara Barbara B. Tillett On Feb 6, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de wrote: Barbara, I can??? Now this is a pleasant surprise. Only I'm not sure where it says so in the rules. The optional omission in 2.4.1.5 explicitly states omit all but the first of each group. I've noted that the optional omission in 2.4.1.4 says Always record the first name appearing in a statement. This sounds as if it were possible to leave out e.g. all names after the fifth. But on the other hand there is an explicit reference to 2.4.1.5: When omitting names from a statement of responsibility naming more than three persons, etc., apply the instructions given under 2.4.1.5. Heidrun Am 06.02.2013 22:06, schrieb JSC Chair: You can do exactly what you suggested with RDA. - Barbara Tillett On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Heidrun Wiesenmüller wrote: After all this talk about German cataloging, I suppose it's time to get back to RDA ;-) The other day we discussed the optional omission for statements of responsibility naming more than three persons, etc. (RDA 2.4.1.5). The general feeling was that although everybody ought to try and follow the standard rule (i.e. transcribe all names), it should be possible to use the optional omission for very long lists, if transcribung all names simply cannot be accomplished. I assume that a very similar idea is expressed in the LC-PCC-PS for 2.4.1.5 in the word generally (Generally do not omit names in a statement of responsibility). But I'm not happy that the only alternatives are either all names (standard rule) or only the first name (option). Why shouldn't it be equally possible to transcribe, say, the first three, five or ten names and then put [and x others]? This might be a more satisfactory way of dealing with longish lists than reducing them to only one name. Of course I'm aware of the fact that the only first name rule corresponds to AACR2. But still, I can see no reason why there shouldn't be more flexibility here. Am I the only one who feels like this? Heidrun -- - Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A. Stuttgart Media University Faculty of Information and Communication Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germanywww.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi -- Dr. Barbara B. Tillett, Ph.D. Chair, Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA -- - Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A. Stuttgart Media University Faculty of Information and Communication Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germanywww.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
[RDA-L] New document on JSC web site
A *table with a summary of the actions*http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/2012-documents-summary.pdftaken by the JSC after discussion of proposals and discussion papers at the November 2012 meeting has been posted on the JSC web site. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] 2012 JSC Meeting Outcomes
Outcomes of the November 2012 meeting of the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA have been posted on the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/2012JSCmeetingoutcomes.html Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] RDA Toolkit Outcomes from the 2012 JSC Meeting; two documents posted
In early November, the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) and the Committee of Principals had discussions with the Co-Publishers of RDA. *A blog entry on the RDA Toolkit web site*http://www.rdatoolkit.org/blog/488summarizes decisions and outcomes related to four projects led by the Co-Publishers: the 2013 release schedule of the RDA Toolkit, the print version of RDA, the rewording of RDA chapters, and *Essential RDA*. Two documents were posted recently on the JSC web site: -- 6JSC/Chair/6 (RDA Music Joint Working Group: Terms of Reference) -- 6JSC/Sec/7 (Fast Track entries included in the December 2012 release of RDA Toolkit) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
Re: [RDA-L] Additional work required by RDA
Ben, Re: Finally--I certainly agree with you about DVD's, and I don't really think RDA content/media/carrier vocabularies improve upon that situation. If anything they go backwards--under AACR2 it was common to code the 300 $a as 1 CD-ROM or 1 DVD-ROM, but under RDA we're supposed to record the extent of the resource by giving the number of units and an appropriate term for the type of carrier which leads us to record 1 computer disc. The only way I've figured out to indicate DVD vs Blu-Ray or CD-ROM vs DVD-ROM is with a note. You can say 1 CD-ROM or 1 DVD-ROM. See RDA 3.4.1.5, condition c). Judy Kuhagen On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse babra...@mit.eduwrote: Certainly, more form/genre term would be helpful; but if interactive material (or whatever it was called) was a content type, we could use form/genre headings to record and provide access to specific genres of games and interactive documents (of which there are many). I appreciate what you are saying about the difficulty of creating a generalized vocabulary. It has always been my understanding (or my hope) that these lists were not meant to be canonical for all time--that we should expect new terms to come into the vocabulary as people find new uses for it. I think that if content type is meant to categorize the fundamental form of communication in which the content is expressed and the human sense through which it is intended to be perceived then none of the existing content type express the fact that ludic material is meant to be perceived through interaction. Text implies static content (and anyways not all game are textual in nature--have you ever played Set? If not, I recommend it for any cataloger--in fact, I use it my cataloging class to demonstrate what facets are.) It also occurs to me that RDA 6.9.1.3 states, Record as many [content type] terms as are applicable to the resource being described so a computer game, for example, could be described: 336 $a computer $b c $2 rdacontent 336 $a interactive $b i $2 rdacontent Finally--I certainly agree with you about DVD's, and I don't really think RDA content/media/carrier vocabularies improve upon that situation. If anything they go backwards--under AACR2 it was common to code the 300 $a as 1 CD-ROM or 1 DVD-ROM, but under RDA we're supposed to record the extent of the resource by giving the number of units and an appropriate term for the type of carrier which leads us to record 1 computer disc. The only way I've figured out to indicate DVD vs Blu-Ray or CD-ROM vs DVD-ROM is with a note. In any case this is an interesting discussion, so thank you. ==Ben Benjamin Abrahamse Cataloging Coordinator Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems MIT Libraries 617-253-7137 -Original Message- From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 1:31 PM To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access Cc: Benjamin A Abrahamse Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Additional work required by RDA On 10/25/2012 1:20 PM, Benjamin A Abrahamse wrote: If a library holds software, mightn't a user want to see a list of all the software the library holds, whether games or word processors or what have you I suppose. But that seems to me like a less direct, or usual user task than, Show me what games your library has. (Which currently cannot be answered, for computer games or otherwise, by the RDA content/media/carrier vocabulary.) I'm not sure it seems to me like less direct or less usual, probably depends on the environment (maybe in a public library it's a usual question?). But at any rate. You can't do that with AACR2/MARC GMDs/SMDs either, can you? Perhaps the right place to record something to answer this question is actually in a 6xx/LCSH $v form/genre heading? I know LC is doing work on revising the LCSH form/genre heading thesaurus too -- like I said, this is a difficult thing to make a generalizable taxonomy for. Perhaps that's the right place for there to be a 'games' heading (entered in a 655), as 'game' is really more of a 'genre' having to do with the content and the author's intentions for it's use, than it is a form/format/carrier having to do with the physical properties of the item, that the RDA vocabularies we're talking about focus on. This stuff is really tricky to encompass with standardized shareable general and universal vocabularies, it's probably not possible to do so completely (and nothing libraries have tried yet comes close either. For instance, trying to display or limit by whether an item is a DVD (let alone blue-ray vs standard dvd!), which seems to me to be a VERY common user need in contemporary libraries accross communities and types (public as well as academic) -- is a somewhat herculean task with our legacy metadata).
Re: [RDA-L] Content type (RDA 6.9) clarification
Dear May, You're correct; the content type should be in subfield $h and not enclosed in parentheses. The mistake in that slide is my error. I'll post a corrected version on the JSC web site. Thanks, Judy Kuhagen On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Chan, May (Library) may.ch...@bpl.bc.cawrote: Hi there, ** ** I’m hoping someone well versed in RDA can help me with this. ** ** The following slide comes from Module 3 from the Georgia Public Library Cataloguing Summit: ** ** ** ** The slide indicates that the access point for content type is to coded in subfield $h (which I’m presuming is X00$h or X30$h) ** ** If this is the case, why is “spoken word” given in parentheses as a qualifying element? I would expect something more like: ** ** X30 $a ___ .$h Spoken word OR X00 $a ___ .$t. $h Spoken word ** ** ** ** Also, why is the MARC21 label for this subfield called “medium”? Wouldn’t it be more consistent to call it “content type”? ** ** May ** ** -- May Chan Cataloguing Manager BCCATS Continuing Education Representative Burnaby Public Library Tel: (604) 436-5424 Fax: (604) 436-2961 The contents of this message may not necessarily reflect the position of the Burnaby Public Library. If you have any concerns about this message, please email b...@bpl.bc.ca. *P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.* ** ** ** ** ** ** inline: image002.png
[RDA-L] New representatives appointed to the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC)
Two new members have been appointed by their constituencies to the JSC: Gordon Dunsire and Bill Leonard. Gordon represents CILIP (Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals); the CILIP position in the JSC had been vacant this past year. Bill represents the Canadian Committee on Cataloguing; he is the successor to Marg Stewart, a long-time member of the JSC and former JSC Secretary, who recently retired from Library and Archives Canada. More information about the two new members is given below. Contact information for them is available at the *JSC members listing*http://www.rda-jsc.org/members.html . = = = = = Gordon is an independent consultant and former Head of the Centre for Digital Library Research at the University of Strathclyde. He has been a member of the CILIP-BL Committee on RDA since 2003, and of the RDA Outreach Group since 2005. He has contributed to several important meetings for the development of RDA, including the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, 1997, the RDA/ONIX workshop, London, 2005, and the Data Model meeting on RDA and Semantic Web communities, London, 2007. Users of the RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization will know Gordon as the facilitator for its development. He is particularly well-known in Scotland as a member of the committee of the Cataloguing and Indexing Group in Scotland, and as E-Services Officer of the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals in Scotland. Recently he has been involved in the development of the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) and Functional Requirements (FR) family of models maintained by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), as well as the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. He was also a co-author of the final report of the W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group. Currently Gordon is contributing to the revision of alignments between ISBD and RDA, and researching and developing Semantic Web mappings between major bibliographic schemas and vocabularies, including RDA, ISBD, the FR models, MARC 21, UNIMARC, and Dublin Core. He continues to give presentations to international conferences and contribute papers to professional journals on topics associated with cataloguing standards, universal bibliographic control, and linked data. = = = = = Bill Leonard graduated from the University of Western Ontario in 1990. His first position was as a government documents cataloguer at the National Library of Canada (now Library and Archives Canada). Bill left NLC to pursue an archivist position in his hometown of Calgary after which he returned to Ottawa to work at the Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information as a cataloguer, system librarian, and team leader. Bill rejoined Library and Archives Canada (LAC ) in 2002 as an Information Standards Specialist which marked the beginning of his significant involvement with national and international standards development. Bill has contributed to the development and maintenance of ISO TC46 standards and is the Chair of the Canadian mirror committee for ISO TC46. In addition, Bill is LAC's representative to the MARC Advisory Committee as well as to the Canadian Committee on MARC. As a member of the RDA/MARC Working Group, Bill participated in the activity to revise MARC 21 to accommodate RDA and he will continue to act as the liaison to the MARC community on RDA-related issues. Bill is very well-known within the Canadian cataloguing community and was welcomed by the Canadian Committee on Cataloguing as its representative to the JSC. = = = = = Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct.10 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal or paper). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/16/EURIG response 6JSC/ALA/17/EURIG response 6JSC/ALA/18/EURIG response 6JSC/ALA/19/EURIG response
[RDA-L] Agenda for the November 2012 JSC meeting
The *agenda for the November 2012 meeting*http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-A-2.pdfof the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) is now available. The JSC will meet November 5-9, 2012 in Chicago, Illinois, USA, at the American Library Association Headquarters building (50 East Huron Street). Observers may attend the public sessions of the meeting. Because there is limited room for observers, please contact the JSC Chair, *Barbara Tillett*jscch...@rdatoolkit.org, if you want to attend any of the sessions. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct. 8 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal or paper). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ACOC/5/ALA response 6JSC/ACOC/6/ALA response 6JSC/ALA/19/LC response 6JSC/ALA/21/LC response 6JSC/BL/2/ALA response 6JSC/BL/3/ALA response 6JSC/BL/4/ALA response 6JSC/BL/5/ALA response 6JSC/BL/6/ALA response 6JSC/BL/7/ALA response 6JSC/BL/8/ALA response 6JSC/BL/9/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/6/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/7/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/8/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/9/ALA response 6JSC/CCC/10/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/1/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/2/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/3/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/4/ALA response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1/ALA response 6JSC/IAML/1/ALA response 6JSC/ISSN/1/ALA response 6JSC/ISSN/2/ALA response 6JSC/ISSN/3/ALA response 6JSC/LC/9/ALA response 6JSC/LC/10/ALA response 6JSC/LC/11/ALA response 6JSC/LC/12/ALA response 6JSC/LC/13/ALA response 6JSC/LC/14/ALA response 6JSC/LC/15/ALA response 6JSC/LC/16/ALA response 6JSC/LC/17/ALA response 6JSC/LC/18/ALA response 6JSC/LC/19/ALA response 6JSC/LC/20/ALA response 6JSC/LC/21/ALA response 6JSC/LC/22/ALA response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct. 6 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal or paper). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ACOC/5/CILIP response 6JSC/ACOC/5/LC response 6JSC/ACOC/6/LC response 6JSC/ALA/5/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/9/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/10/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/11/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/12/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/14/LC response 6JSC/ALA/15/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/16/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/17/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/17/LC response 6JSC/ALA/20/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/20/LC response 6JSC/ALA/21/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/2/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/2/LC response 6JSC/BL/3/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/4/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/4/LC response 6JSC/BL/5/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/6/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/7/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/8/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/9/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/1/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/2/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/3/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/4/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/4/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1/LC response 6JSC/IAML/1/CILIP response 6JSC/IAML/1/LC response 6JSC/ISSN/3/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/10/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/15/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/16/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/21/CCC response/rev
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct. 5 additions
The discussion papers and responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal or paper). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA rep/4 6JSC/ALA rep/5 6JSC/CILIP rep/1 6JSC/CILIP rep/2 6JSC/ALA/6/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/18/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/18/Addendum/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/19/DNB response 6JSC/BL/2/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/1/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/2/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/3/DNB response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1/DNB response 6JSC/IAML/1/DNB response 6JSC/LC/11/DNB response 6JSC/LC/13/DNB response 6JSC/LC/17/DNB response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct. 3 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/16/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/19/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/9/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1/ACOC response 6JSC/IAML/1/ACOC response 6JSC/ISSN/1/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/19/CCC response 6JSC/LC/20/CCC response 6JSC/LC/21/CCC response 6JSC/LC/22/CCC response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct. 2 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/5/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/7/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/8/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/9/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/10/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/11/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/12/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/13/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/14/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/15/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/16/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/17/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/20/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/21DNB response 6JSC/BL/3/DNB response 6JSC/BL/4/DNB response 6JSC/BL/5/DNB response 6JSC/BL/6/DNB response 6JSC/BL/7/DNB response 6JSC/BL/8/DNB response 6JSC/BL/9/DNB response 6JSC/LC/9/DNB response 6JSC/LC/10/DNB response 6JSC/LC/12/DNB response 6JSC/LC/14/DNB response 6JSC/LC/15/DNB response 6JSC/LC/16/DNB response 6JSC/LC/18/DNB response 6JSC/LC/19/DNB response 6JSC/LC/20/DNB response 6JSC/LC/21/DNB response 6JSC/LC/22/DNB response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Oct. 1 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ACOC/5/DNB response 6JSC/ACOC/6/DNB response 6JSC/ALA/13/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/14/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/15/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/16/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/17/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/18/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/18/Addendum/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/19/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/20/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/21/CCC response 6JSC/CCC/6/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/7/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/8/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/9/DNB response 6JSC/CCC/10/DNB response 6JSC/IAML/1/CCC response 6JSC/ISSN/1/CCC response 6JSC/ISSN/1/DNB response 6JSC/ISSN/2/CCC response 6JSC/ISSN/2/DNB response 6JSC/ISSN/3/CCC response 6JSC/ISSN/3/DNB response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Sept. 30 additions
The responses and a document listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ACOC/5/CCC response 6JSC/ACOC/6/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/5/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/6/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/7/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/8/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/9/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/10/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/11/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/12/CCC response 6JSC/ALA/13/LC response/rev [to correct the subject line] 6JSC/BL/2/CCC response 6JSC/BL/3/CCC response 6JSC/BL/4/CCC response 6JSC/BL/5/CCC response 6JSC/BL/6/CCC response 6JSC/BL/7/CCC response 6JSC/BL/8/CCC response 6JSC/BL/9/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/1/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/2/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/3/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/4/CCC response 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1/CCC response 6JSC/LC/9/CCC response 6JSC/LC/10/CCC response 6JSC/LC/11/CCC response 6JSC/LC/12/CCC response 6JSC/LC/13/CCC response 6JSC/LC/14/CCC response 6JSC/LC/15/CCC response 6JSC/LC/16/CCC response 6JSC/LC/17/CCC response 6JSC/LC/18/CCC response 6JSC/Sec/5
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Sept. 26 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/12/LC response 6JSC/ALA/13/LC response 6JSC/CCC/7/LC response 6JSC/CCC/8/LC response 6JSC/CCC/9/LC response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Sept. 25 additions
The responses and documents listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen, JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/12/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/14/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/15/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/20/ACOC response 6JSC/CCC/7/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/2/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/4/ACOC response 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1/Alignment 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/2 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/2/Mapping
Re: [RDA-L] RDA Music Joint Working Group
Dear Jean and other colleagues, When RDA was being developed, there was not consensus in the music cataloging communities within the author countries about how to revise the AACR2 special rules on music to make them be more principle-based, to reflect the FRBR Group 1 entities, to reflect appropriate relationships, etc. As a consequence, most of those special rules were just moved from AACR2 to RDA. The JSC knew that more work was needed in this area. Since the release of RDA, there have been a few revisions to RDA music instructions. The goal of this new working group is to identify and propose more far-ranging revisions to RDA music instructions; they will make joint proposals for music cataloging communities both within and outside the author countries to consider for the ongoing development of RDA for these resources. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jean Weihs jean.we...@rogers.com wrote: Hi Sheila, We probably won't be writing about music materials, so this probably doesn't affect us, but it does show that RDA is far from finished. Jean On 17/09/2012 9:27 PM, JSC Secretary wrote: A joint working group has been appointed to submit music-related proposals to the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). The members of the group represent three organizations: the Canadian Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres; the Library of Congress (U.S.A.); and, the Music Library Association (U.S.A.). At this time, the JSC constituencies outside North America have decided not to nominate members to the working group. Members of the working group are the following: Steven Yusko, Chair (Library of Congress, U.S.A.) Rachel Gagnon (CAML, Library and Archives Canada) Cheryl Martin (CAML; Western University, Canada) Daniel Paradis (CAML; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, Canada) Caitlin Hunter (LC, U.S.A.) Geraldine Ostrove (LC, U.S.A.) Janet Bradford (MLA; Brigham Young University, U.S.A.) Robert Freeborn (MLA; Pennsylvania State University, U.S.A.) Tracey Snyder (MLA; Cornell University, U.S.A.) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Sept. 18 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/17/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/18/ACOC response 6JSC/CCC/8/ACOC response 6JSC/CCC/9/ACOC response 6JSC/ISSN/2/ACOC response
[RDA-L] RDA Music Joint Working Group
A joint working group has been appointed to submit music-related proposals to the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC). The members of the group represent three organizations: the Canadian Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres; the Library of Congress (U.S.A.); and, the Music Library Association (U.S.A.). At this time, the JSC constituencies outside North America have decided not to nominate members to the working group. Members of the working group are the following: Steven Yusko, Chair (Library of Congress, U.S.A.) Rachel Gagnon (CAML, Library and Archives Canada) Cheryl Martin (CAML; Western University, Canada) Daniel Paradis (CAML; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, Canada) Caitlin Hunter (LC, U.S.A.) Geraldine Ostrove (LC, U.S.A.) Janet Bradford (MLA; Brigham Young University, U.S.A.) Robert Freeborn (MLA; Pennsylvania State University, U.S.A.) Tracey Snyder (MLA; Cornell University, U.S.A.) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site: Sept. 14 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/11/LC response 6JSC/ALA/16/LC response 6JSC/ALA/21/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/7/LC response 6JSC/CCC/6/ACOC response 6JSC/CCC/10/ACOC response 6JSC/CCC/10/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/1/ACOC response 6JSC/EURIG/3/ACOC response 6JSC/ISSN/1/LC response 6JSC/ISSN/2/LC response 6JSC/ISSN/3/ACOC response 6JSC/ISSN/3/LC response
[RDA-L] JSC website: Sept. 7 additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen, JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ACOC/6/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/6/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/7/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/8/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/13/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/14/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/18/CILIP response 6JSC/ALA/18/LC response 6JSC/ALA/19/CILIP response 6JSC/BL/3/LC response 6JSC/BL/5/LC response 6JSC/BL/6/LC response 6JSC/BL/8/LC response 6JSC/CCC/6/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/7/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/8/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/9/CILIP response 6JSC/CCC/10/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/1/CILIP response 6JSC/EURIG/2/LC response 6JSC/EURIG/3/LC response 6JSC/ISSN/1/CILIP response 6JSC/ISSN/2/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/9/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/11/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/12/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/13/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/14/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/17/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/18/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/19/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/20/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/21/CILIP response 6JSC/LC/22/CILIP response
[RDA-L] JSC web site: recent additions
The responses listed below have been added to the JSC web site: http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html or http://www.rda-jsc.org/working1.html (click on proposal). Regards, Judy Kuhagen, JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ALA/5/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/6/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/7/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/8/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/9/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/10/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/11/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/13/ACOC response 6JSC/ALA/15/LC response 6JSC/BL/2/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/3/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/4/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/5/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/6/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/7/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/8/ACOC response 6JSC/BL/9/LC response 6JSC/CCC/6/LC response 6JSC/LC/9/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/10/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/11/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/12/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/13/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/14/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/15/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/16/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/17/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/18/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/19/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/20/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/21/ACOC response 6JSC/LC/22/ACOC response
[RDA-L] Addition to the JSC web site: August 17, 2012
This discussion paper has been added to the JSC web site: [http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html] 6JSC/ISSN/3Discussion paper: Serials and changes in mode of issuance – is a new description always needed? Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC, ISBD, and ISSN: harmonization discussions
An announcement about the 2011 JSC, ISBD, and ISSN harmonization discussions has been posted on the JSC web site with an indication that some topics will be addressed at the November 2012 JSC meeting. http://www.rda-jsc.org/2011jscisbdissnoutcomes.html Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Recent additions to the JSC website
The proposals and discussion papers listed below have been posted on the JSC website (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html). Also see the new announcement (http://www.rda-jsc.org/2012proposals.html) on the website: 2012 RDA Proposals and Discussion Papers; it has information about all the proposals and discussion papers for the November 2012 meeting of the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary = = = = = 6JSC/ACOC/5 Compilations in RDA chapter 6, Discussion paper 6JSC/ACOC/6 Revision of RDA 3.19.7.3, Recording transmission speed 6JSC/ALA/18 Proposed Revision of RDA Instructions for Government and Non-Government Corporate Bodies 6JSC/ALA/18/Addendum Proposed Revision of RDA Instructions for Government and Non-Government Corporate Bodies: Examples 6JSC/ALA/20 Proposed revision of RDA 2.1.2.2 and 2.1.2.3, Basis for Identification of the Resource 6JSC/ALA/21 Proposed Revisions of RDA instructions on Sources of Information (RDA 2.2.2.1–2.2.2.4) 6JSC/CCC/6 Instruction for choosing the preferred title for choreographic works (RDA 6.2.2.4) 6JSC/CCC/7 Proposed revision to instructions 6.14.2.7.2, “Two or More Parts,” 6.14.2.8, “Compilations of Musical Works,” and 6.28.2.3, “Two or More Parts” 6JSC/CCC/8 Proposed revision to instruction 6.28.1.11, “Additions to Access Points Representing Compilations of Musical Works” 6JSC/CCC/9 Proposed revision to instruction 6.16.1.3, “Recording Numeric Designations of Musical Works” 6JSC/CCC/10 Proposed revision to Appendix B.1 General Guideline to explicitly include the usage of units of measure expressed as symbols 6JSC/IAML/1 Revision of RDA 2.5.2.1, 2.5.2.2 Designation of Edition, addition in Chapter 2 of a core element for Format of Notated Music Statement … 6JSC/ISSN/1Revision of RDA 1.6.2.2, and RDA 3.1.6.1 regarding change in media type of serials 6JSC/ISSN/2 Major title changes for serials in Chinese, Japanese and Korean (RDA 2.3.2.13.1, ISBD A.2.6.1 and ISSN 2.3.1), discussion paper about the “first five words” rule
[RDA-L] August 14, 2012 release of the RDA Toolkit
The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) has prepared another set of minor changes to the content of *RDA: Resource Description and Access*. The August 14, 2012 release of the RDA Toolkit will contain Fast Track changes from the JSC, as well as corrections and new Glossary terms for element vocabularies. For more information, see the listing of *approved FastTrack and other changes* http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-Sec-4.pdf. For more information about other current changes in the RDA Toolkit (e.g., ), see the *announcement* http://www.rdatoolkit.org/content/427 on the RDA Toolkit development site. Minor changes in RDA were also included in the June 12, 2012 release of the RDA Toolkit; for more information on those changes, see the listing of *approved FastTrack and other changes*http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-Sec-3-rev-2.pdfin the June release. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Additions to the JSC web site: August 1, 2012
These proposals have been added to the JSC web site: [http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html] 6JSC/ALA/15 Hearings in RDA 19.2.1.1.1 6JSC/ALA/19 Proposed Revision of RDA 16.2.2 (Preferred Name for the Place) 6JSC/EURIG/1 Addition of examples in RDA 6.12.1.3 and 6.27.3 6JSC/EURIG/2 Date of expression - Revision of RDA 6.10.1.1 and 6.10.1.3 6JSC/EURIG/3 Language of expression - Revision of RDA 6.11, 6.11.1.3, 6.11.1.4, 7.12.1.3, 26.1.1.3 6JSC/EURIG/4 Musical arrangements - Revision of RDA 6.18.1.4 and 6.28.3.2.1 6JSC/EURIG/Discussion/1 Musical arrangements: discussion paper Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Additions to the JSC web site: July 28, 2012
These proposals have been added to the JSC web site: [http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html] 6JSC/BL/2 3.11.4 Layout of tactile text and 3.13 Font Size 6JSC/BL/7 Change to Definition of 9.16.1.1 Profession or Occupation 6JSC/BL/8 Change to 19.3 and Appendix I. Recording relationships to persons, families, and corporate bodies associated with works of unknown or uncertain origin. 6JSC/BL/9 Change to 2.2.4 to remove parallel title proper 6JSC/ALA/11 Revision of RDA 2.11.1.3 (Recording Copyright Dates) 6JSC/ALA/12 Revision of RDA 6.15.1.3 (Recording Medium of Performance) 6JSC/ALA/13 Revision of RDA instructions relating to librettos and lyrics for musical works (RDA 6.2.2.10.2, 6.27.4.2, Appendix I.2.1, and Glossary) 6JSC/ALA/14 Revision of RDA instructions for arrangements and adaptations of musical works (RDA 6.28.1.5.2 and 6.28.3.2.2) Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] Additions to the JSC web site
The following proposals have been added to the JSC web site: [http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html] -- 6JSC/LC/20Revisions to RDA Chapter 6 to treat Selections as a work attribute -- 6JSC/LC/21Clarification of leaves and pages (3.4.5.2 and Glossary) -- 6JSC/LC/22Revisions to Date Associated with the Person (9.3) when recording more than a year alone Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site updated
Now that the JSC web site problems have been fixed, I've updated the following sections: 1. Members (http://www.rda-jsc.org/members.html): to add information about Gordon Dunsire, the new representative from CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. 2. News Announcements: 2012 Possible RDA Proposals ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/2012possibleproposals.html): to add additional entries from the American Library Association, the British Library, EURIG (European RDA Interest Group), the ISSN community, and the Library of Congress; to add links for submitted proposals. 3. New JSC documents (http://www.rda-jsc.org/workingnew.html): to add the documents listed below. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary 6JSC/ACOC/4 – MARC to RDA gap analysis [not posted to the web site in 2011; submitted for information, not requiring JSC responses or JSC discussion] 6JSC/ALA/10/LC response – Response to “Revision of RDA 2.5.1.4, Recording Edition Statements” 6JSC/ALA/10 -- Revision of RDA 2.5.1.4, Recording Edition Statements 6JSC/BL/6 -- Other place associated with the person: Revision of RDA 9.11 6JSC/BL/5 -- Fuller forms of name: Revision of RDA 9.19.1.4 Optional addition 6JSC/BL/4 -- Other designation associated with the person: Revision of RDA 9.0, 9.6.1 and 9.19.l 6JSC/BL/3 -- Terms of rank, honour or office: Revision of RDA 9.4.1 and 9.19.1 6JSC/ALA/9/LC response – Response to “Initial Articles in Place Names (RDA 16.2.2.3)” 6JSC/ALA/8/LC response – Response to “Revision of RDA 6.28.1.9, Additions to access points representing musical works with titles that are not distinctive” 6JSC/ALA/7/LC response – Response to “Revision of RDA 2.12.8 and 2.12.16, regarding recording ISSNs” 6JSC/ALA/6/LC response – Response to “Revision of RDA 11.5.1.3 (Recording Associated Institutions) and 9.13.1.3 (Recording Affiliations)” 6JSC/ALA/5/LC response – Response to “Revision of RDA 6.21 (Other distinguishing characteristics of a legal work) and 6.29.1.33 (Additions to access points representing treaties, etc.)” 6JSC/LC/19 -- Additional instructions for preferred sources and preferred titles in different languages or scripts (RDA 2.2.3.1 and 6.2.2.4) 6JSC/LC/18 -- Revisions to Change of Name of Jurisdiction or Locality (RDA 11.3.3.4) 6JSC/LC/17 -- Reorganization of instructions for recording extent (3.4.1.3, 3.4.1.5) 6JSC/LC/16 -- Additional exception in 9.19.1.2 (Title or Other Designation Associated with the Person) for titles of religious rank 6JSC/LC/15 -- Reorganization of instruction on saints in 9.2.2.18 6JSC/LC/14 -- Revision to RDA 9.3.1.3 (Recording Dates Associated with Persons), H.1 (B.C. and A.D. Dates), and associated examples to clarify recording date spans 6JSC/LC/13 -- Adjustment to exception for recording acronym/initialism titles in favor of base instruction (2.3.2.5, exception) 6JSC/LC/12 -- Priority order of additions to authorized access points representing a person (9.19.1.1, 9.19.1.5, 9.19.1.6) 6JSC/LC/11 -- Revisions to Date associated with the corporate body (RDA 11.4, 11.4.3, 11.4.4, 0.6.4) 6JSC/LC/10 -- Revision to RDA 11.13.1.8 (Number, date, location, of a conference, etc.) 6JSC/LC/9 -- Revisions to Date Associated with the Person (RDA 9.3, 9.3.2, 9.3.3)
[RDA-L] JSC web site available now
The web site of the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA ( http://www.rda-jsc.org/) is now available. Recently-submitted proposals and other documents will be added later today. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] JSC web site not available
The website of the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (JSC) has not been available since mid-June. Below is a portion of a message from the information technology people at the American Library Association; I'm including it in this message with the permission of staff at ALA Publishing. When the JSC website is available, I'll send another announcement to this list. On Sunday June 17st during a hardware upgrade, our web site host provider dreamhost experienced a massive hardware failure on the server hosting the JSC website. In addition there are also issues with the backup server as well further delaying the restore from a backup file. At this time, they are migrating all data to a new server. The server has a massive amount of data, so this process will take some time. So far we do not have an estimated timeline form the hosting company when this server will be back online. Regards, Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
[RDA-L] New postings on JSC site
A news announcement (http://www.rda-jsc.org/2012possibleproposals.html) lists possible and submitted proposals for revision of RDA. The list will be updated when information about other possible proposals is available. The following proposals submitted by the American Library Association have been posted: - *6JSC/ALA/6* http://www.rda-jsc.org/working2.html#6ala6 [Revision of RDA 11.5.1.3 (Recording Associated Institutions) and 9.13.1.3 (Recording Affiliations)] - *6JSC/ALA/7* http://www.rda-jsc.org/working2.html#6ala7 [Revision of RDA 2.12.8 and 2.12.16, regarding recording ISSNs] - *6JSC/ALA/8* http://www.rda-jsc.org/working2.html#6ala8 [Revision of RDA 6.28.1.9, Additions to access points representing musical works with titles that are not distinctive] - *6JSC/ALA/9* http://www.rda-jsc.org/working2.html#6ala9 [Initial Articles in Place Names (RDA 16.2.2.3)] Judy Kuhagen JSC Secretary
