[Repeater-Builder] KENWOOD TK 320 HAND HELDS

2005-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I KNOW THIS IS NOT MOTOROLA BUT I NEED SOME HELP FROM THE PROS

IS THERE SOMEONE OUT THERE THAT REMEMBERS HOW TO PROGRAM THE KENWOOD TK320 UHF 
HANDHELDS, THEREE WAS A WAY TO DO IT BY SHORTING SOMETHING WHEN THE RADIO WAS 
POWERED UP

THANK YOU .BOB 

___
Speed up your surfing with Juno SpeedBand.
Now includes pop-up blocker!
Only $14.95/month -visit http://www.juno.com/surf to sign up today!





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS

2005-02-18 Thread Jeff Otterson

Hello Jay,

   The NHRC-4/M2 should work fine in your radio, as long as the proper 
modifications are made to the systems board.  The CAS line is buffered with 
a transistor in the controller already.

   You might want to check that there are no other jumpers or modifications 
made to the systems board on the radio that could be causing you this grief.

   We have sold hundreds of those controllers; the problem you are 
experiencing is not typical.  Something else is wrong.

   Regards,

   Jeff Otterson, N1KDO
   NHRC LLC


At 11:32 PM 2/17/2005, you wrote:

Hi Coy,
I have a lot of different info now on trying to get a cos signal to
my nhrc4/m2 controller.  Can you give me the schematic for using the 2n
transistor to buffer the cas line.  Any and all suggestions will be used.
Incidentally, the A- lines were not tied together, I had the TX on a 20amp
power supply and the receiver on a deep cycle battery .so no A- were
tied together.

I will try all ideas and want to thank everyone on this list for
their suggestions.  I will report back on what works for me.  Thanks again.
Jay
- Original Message -
From: Coy Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:04 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS


 
 
  If the A- are tied togeather then that's not the problem. I use the
  NHRC2 controller. The CAS doesn't like to source current. I always
  use a 2N or a NPN transistor and a 10k resistor connected to the
  CAS line to buffer it and it doesn't load down the CAS line.
  I hope this helps.
  AC0Y
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Why didnt I think of thatknowing the ground is isolated...I
  have been
   tying the chassis together instead of the A-..  what was I
  thinking..Hmmm !
   I will give it a try Bob... I am @ work @ firehouse right now but
  am anxious
   to get home and check that out.  Even if that doesnt cure the
  problem , it
   makes things the way they should be, ground wise that is. Tnx
  againJay
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Bob Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:00 PM
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] M2 CAS
  
  
   
At 2/17/2005 11:55 AM, you wrote:
   
Thanks for the info Bob,

  I may try the high side inject...sure couldnt
  hurt, it
would be much nicer to have one compact package than 2... as
  far as using
the RUS... that didnt work either... not even enough voltage to
  fire up
   the
controller... I may well have a controller problem with the
  NHRC /M2.
   
Seems like the ground between the external Mastr II  NHRC
  controller
   isn't
good.  Make sure the A- lines of both Mastr IIs are tied
  together (not
   just
the chassis, which is DC isolated) before giving up on the
  separate Mastr
II RX.
   
Bob NO6B
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






Yahoo! Groups Links









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Source for Moto T1504 duplexer locking nuts?

2005-02-18 Thread Paul Kelley

There are at least two types of BpBr cavity as well.  I have 
a homebrew T1504 duplexer using four Moto BpBr cavities.  
Two have the slotted 1/2 inch threads and lock nut.  The 
other two have 1/2 inch mounting threads and no slots; the 
threads also do not extend far enough forward from the 
mounting nut to get anything else on there.  However the 
1/2 inch diameter piece is tapered in front of the mounting 
nut, as though perhaps some sort of nut is supposed to 
screw onto the tuning rod itself to jam against this 
tapered section?  Some of these cavities may not have come 
from T1503/4 duplexers, but they are identical except for 
this lock nut situation.

Paul


On Friday 18 February 2005 01:09 am, Steve Rodgers wrote:
 Whoops that previous message was a little fast and loose;
 there are 2 types of Moto cavity. The cavity I just
 looked at was a bandpass only unit and it has the slots
 in the 1/2 inch threads as mentioned. The cavities from a
 BP/BR unit do not have the 1/2 inch slotted threads;
 instead only has non-slotted threads (at a larger
 diameter) for the mounting nut.

 It looks like there are two different locking solutions.
 The jam nuts work on the banpass only cans, but there
 must be something different for the BP/BR cans.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] What PA temp is too much?

2005-02-18 Thread Mike Pugh

Got a link? Mike

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Henry Radio uses 125 degree thermo-switches on their commercial amps. If 
 you check out their web page they sell the switches for $9.50  The 
 switches are used to activate 12-V cooling fans on their amps.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 * To visit your group on the web, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

 * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
   Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. 
 
 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Doug Zastrow






Hello All,

I'm selecting replacement jumpersfor a two-meter 
repeater system. Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer 
antenna port to antenna Heliax jumpers.

Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers. 
Should I steer clear of the Valueflex?

Thanks

Doug, WB0UPJ













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Mike Perryman






Doug,
Youve 
got me stumped... I can find no references to "Valueflex" on 
the Andrew site, or in catalog 38. I did see a reference to "sureflex" 
factory made jumpers...
I hate 
to hazard a guess... other than to say I personally would stick with the 
standard FSJ4-50B (also known as superflex), or LDF4-50A(low-loss cable). 
For short jumper type runs, the standard FSJ4-50B cable should be more than 
sufficient.
Sorry 
I can't be more helpful...

mike

  -Original Message-From: Doug Zastrow 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:18 
  AMTo: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
  [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible 
  Jumpers
  Hello All,
  
  I'm selecting replacement jumpersfor a two-meter 
  repeater system. Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer 
  antenna port to antenna Heliax jumpers.
  
  Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers. 
  Should I steer clear of the Valueflex?
  
  Thanks
  
  Doug, WB0UPJ













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] tle 1713 amp circuits wanted

2005-02-18 Thread Toby Hoover






IT ME AGAIN.
LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THE TLE 1713 
AMPIF BAD
.
TOOK IT APART AND A COUPLE OF THE 10 OHM 
RESISTOR IS BURN INTO
 WORK LIKE TO HAVE A PRINT OF THE CIRCUITS 
AND ORTHER INFO. ON IT.
EMAIL OR A PLACE WHERE I CAN DOWNLOAD 
IT.

N9FDF TOBY














Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] Re: Neulink / Neutec and Repco

2005-02-18 Thread skipp025


Let me scare you even more Mathew... Neutec 
made a base and mobile repeater using the 
duplex version of radios you mentioned. I have 
two of the full blown rack mount repeaters on 
the shelf here and the much coveted manual 
in my files.  

The radios are Eprom programed after you 
do the manual instructed binary math for 
picking your frequency. Kind of takes me 
back to the Bearcat 101 scanner days...

They even make/made 800 ltr trunking radios. 

Like any radio of the era, they worked fine 
until you beat them up and tried to find 
parts and tech support from a local Dealer. 

The Neulink boards are all over the place, 
like Paul mentions... I first used them 
at 900 Mhz for a paging application. 

Along a theme are the Repco boards on 
surplus market. For a time, you could pick 
up a really nice 463 receiver strip off 
Ebay for about $10. The front ends are 
good enough to use them for basic tasks 
at semi busy locations. 

More fun small tx/rx boards are the small 
data units made by EF Johnson. 

cheers,
skipp 

 Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How would you rate them as far as being 
 good or bad units?
 Mathew
 
 From: Paul Finch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Mathew,
 Nope, I have about three different receivers 
 and transmitters.
 Paul WB5IDM
 
 From: Mathew Quaife [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Wow and I thought I was the only one that had 
 some Neulink stuff, as I never heard of it.  
 I have a 2 meter receiver and transmitter radios.  
 If you ever need the manuals, let me know, can 
 take a copy of them.
 Mathew







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Doug Zastrow






Hi Mike,

You are right, ValueFlex is NOT in Andrew Catalog 38 nor 
anywhere to be readilyfound.

I was shopping the A/F CommSupply Catalogand 
found the ValueFlex jumpers on page 53. (Caution if downloading the 
catalog; it is 7 MB.)

I think your advice to stick with SuperFlex is the best course 
to follow.

Thanks...

Doug



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mike Perryman 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:38 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew 
  Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers
  
  Doug,
  
  Youve got me stumped... I can find no references to "Valueflex" on the Andrew site, or in catalog 38. I did see 
  a reference to "sureflex" factory made 
  jumpers...
  
  I 
  hate to hazard a guess... other than to say I personally would stick 
  with the standard FSJ4-50B (also known as superflex), or LDF4-50A(low-loss 
  cable). For short jumper type runs, the standard FSJ4-50B cable should 
  be more than sufficient.
  
  Sorry I can't be more helpful...
  
  mike
  
-Original Message-From: Doug Zastrow 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:18 
AMTo: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
[Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible 
Jumpers
Hello All,

I'm selecting replacement jumpersfor a two-meter 
repeater system. Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer 
antenna port to antenna Heliax jumpers.

Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers. 
Should I steer clear of the Valueflex?

Thanks

Doug, 
WB0UPJ













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] Re: Signal Reports from DH Voter. HOW

2005-02-18 Thread skipp025


Depends on the controller you run. If your 
controller supports an input (a/d converter), 
which equates to a meter S value, you can 
interface to the vote reference bus. The 
bus value should indicate the relative best 
and selected received signal. 

If you want to select specific receivers,
you'd have to switch and interface the 
controller a/d (s-meter) input to each 
receivers level bus/line. 

The receiver logic lines will tell you the 
status of each active signal and voted signal. 

The analog and reference bus lines can supply 
a relative value, which can be interfaced to 
a controller a/d input for selected s-meter 
values. 

Also depends on which model/version of the 
voter you have. 

cheers, 
skipp 

 Kevin  Natalia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 HI All,
 
 I am setting up a Doug Hall Voter, with one main site, and 3
remotes.
 Then I was thinking, how can one make it, so that when a signal
report is requested, it will give a reading from that remote.
 Looked through the manual, and could not find anything.
 So my question, is it possible to get some form of signal reading
from the Voter as to the signal strength from that remote (Active RX).
 I can work out from the I-O lines how to program the controller to
say Main, Remote 1 etc, but at this stage can only get a signal
reading from the main RX, which is at the site.
 
 Thanks
 
 Kev.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer

2005-02-18 Thread Reuben Meeks



Hello Eric, It is presently set up for 147.590 mhz. To be a repeater 
here in the local area. 73',s Reuben, W8GUC.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Reuben,
 
 To what frequencies is this duplexer currently tuned?
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 Reuben Meeks wrote:
  
  I have a Decibel Products, DB4048, Duplexer in mint condition for
  sale. The frequency range is 146 to 174 MHz., in a weather proof
  cabinet.  I was going to build a 2-meter repeater some years 
back but
  never got around to it.  It is designed to handle 400 watts, and
  handle frequencies 0.5 MHz or greater of separation.  It is a 6-
  cavity duplexer in a Hoffman Model A-30-24-16LP weather proof
  cabinet. I have the like new set of cables that were made for the
  duplexer.
  I am asking $575.00, plus shipping costs, or you may pick it up.
  
  You may contact me at work, (937)904-6783, or at home, (937) 454-
  0968. I am located in Vandalia, near Dayton, Ohio.
  Thanks,
  Reuben Meeks, W8GUC
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer

2005-02-18 Thread Reuben Meeks



Hello Eric, It is presently tuned to 147.590/147.390 Mhz. With all 
the matched cables. Tuned by the DB Factory people.
73's, Reuben Meeks, W8GUC.

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Reuben,
 
 To what frequencies is this duplexer currently tuned?
 
 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 
 Reuben Meeks wrote:
  
  I have a Decibel Products, DB4048, Duplexer in mint condition for
  sale. The frequency range is 146 to 174 MHz., in a weather proof
  cabinet.  I was going to build a 2-meter repeater some years 
back but
  never got around to it.  It is designed to handle 400 watts, and
  handle frequencies 0.5 MHz or greater of separation.  It is a 6-
  cavity duplexer in a Hoffman Model A-30-24-16LP weather proof
  cabinet. I have the like new set of cables that were made for the
  duplexer.
  I am asking $575.00, plus shipping costs, or you may pick it up.
  
  You may contact me at work, (937)904-6783, or at home, (937) 454-
  0968. I am located in Vandalia, near Dayton, Ohio.
  Thanks,
  Reuben Meeks, W8GUC
  
  
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: db 4001 to 220

2005-02-18 Thread skipp025


Not knowing how much you shortened the 
tuning adjustment makes it hard to give an 
answer. But yes, you will probably have to 
shorten the cavity outer can/tube. 

Since you've gone this far... assemble the 
cavity leaving the bottom (cold end) snug fit 
in place and measure what you have. Remove small 
amounts of tube length from the bottom end of 
the cavity until you like the resultant range. 

You can rivet, solder or screw the tube end 
back on. Since it's the cold end of the 
cavity, you can get away with a bit of murder. 

cheers, 
skipp 

ps: make sure you have min critical length 
220 loops installed. Extra length loops are 
better than undersized loops. 

 Thomas Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Needed a bandpass cavity for 220 not having one 
 I modified one by shortening the inner plunger 
 and the outer conductor. My question is do I need 
 to shorten the outer cavity?  I don't think it 
 makes any difference what do ya think? I would 
 like to know before I rivet it back together.
 tom n8ies







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Help ID a Celwave item?

2005-02-18 Thread Kevin Bednar
Title: Help ID a Celwave item?









Can anyone ID a Celwave HFD8461A? It looks like some type of notch filter. Has 2 female N connectors, 4 cavity, and says 144-160 Mhz on it. I cant find any reference to it on the web. TIA to all.

Kevin

K2KMB
















Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Signal Reports from DH Voter. HOW

2005-02-18 Thread Jim B.

Here we go again-Yaphooey put me in bounce status for no reason.
They said msg #11290 in radios-4-sale bounced. The last msg in the group 
is 11153! dumb [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Kevin  Natalia wrote:

 HI All,
 
 I am setting up a Doug Hall Voter, with one main site, and 3 remotes.
 Then I was thinking, how can one make it, so that when a signal report is 
 requested, it will give a reading from that remote.
 Looked through the manual, and could not find anything.
 So my question, is it possible to get some form of signal reading from the 
 Voter as to the signal strength from that remote (Active RX).
 I can work out from the I-O lines how to program the controller to say Main, 
 Remote 1 etc, but at this stage can only get a signal reading from the main 
 RX, which is at the site.
 
 Thanks
 
 Kev.
 
Weeelll, ACC had a op-amp circuit that sampled the quieting on the
incoming signal and delivered a 0-5V analog output that could be
measured with one of the A/D inputs on the RC850. You might find that
circuit on the Link-Comm web site.
That's the only way to do it.
-- 
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] KENWOOD TK 320 HAND HELDS

2005-02-18 Thread Jim B.

Here we go again-Yaphooey put me in bounce status for no reason.
They said msg #11290 in radios-4-sale bounced. The last msg in the group 
is 11153! dumb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I KNOW THIS IS NOT MOTOROLA BUT I NEED SOME HELP FROM THE PROS

This isn't a Motorola list, so it doesn't matter.

 
 IS THERE SOMEONE OUT THERE THAT REMEMBERS HOW TO PROGRAM THE KENWOOD
 TK320 UHF HANDHELDS, THEREE WAS A WAY TO DO IT BY SHORTING SOMETHING
 WHEN THE RADIO WAS POWERED UP
 
 THANK YOU .BOB

You could do us a favor-turn off your caps lock! Most folks don't like
to be shouted at!
Thanks!
-- 
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer

2005-02-18 Thread Jim B.

Reuben Meeks wrote:

 
 
 Hello Eric, It is presently tuned to 147.590/147.390 Mhz. With all 
 the matched cables. Tuned by the DB Factory people.
 73's, Reuben Meeks, W8GUC.

You mean 147.99/147.39.
-- 
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Mike Perryman






Doug,
I just 
looked at the page you mentioned... looks like maybe A/F commSupply is 
assembling then in-house or something. They claim to be using Anrew 
cable.. who knows, if they are local it could work to your 
advantage. The only issue might be that they are for "indoor" 
installations. Maybe they lack the shrink tube? Your call on which 
you use... I did notice FSJ4 was not in their line, only 1 and 2 (1/4" and 
5/16" if I recall correctly) minor losses for that jumper 
length. But sturdiness may be an issue if the rack gets moved around a 
lot.

mike

-Original Message-From: 
Doug Zastrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 18, 
2005 12:36 PMTo: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
[Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible 
Jumpers

  Hi Mike,
  
  You are right, ValueFlex is NOT in Andrew Catalog 38 nor 
  anywhere to be readilyfound.
  
  I was shopping the A/F CommSupply Catalogand 
  found the ValueFlex jumpers on page 53. (Caution if downloading the 
  catalog; it is 7 MB.)
  
  I think your advice to stick with SuperFlex is the best 
  course to follow.
  
  Thanks...
  
  Doug
  
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Mike Perryman 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:38 
AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew 
Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

Doug,

Youve got me stumped... I can find no references to "Valueflex" on the Andrew site, or in catalog 38. I did 
see a reference to "sureflex" factory made 
jumpers...

I 
hate to hazard a guess... other than to say I personally would stick 
with the standard FSJ4-50B (also known as superflex), or LDF4-50A(low-loss 
cable). For short jumper type runs, the standard FSJ4-50B cable should 
be more than sufficient.

Sorry I can't be more helpful...

mike

  -Original Message-From: Doug Zastrow 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 
  10:18 AMTo: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.comSubject: 
  [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible 
  Jumpers
  Hello All,
  
  I'm selecting replacement jumpersfor a two-meter 
  repeater system. Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer 
  antenna port to antenna Heliax jumpers.
  
  Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers. 
  Should I steer clear of the Valueflex?
  
  Thanks
  
  Doug, 
  WB0UPJ













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










[Repeater-Builder] db224 modifications

2005-02-18 Thread Jeff Corkren






Can someone direct me to the article 
regarding the conversion of a Decibel model DB224 commercial antenna (150-160 
Mhz) to the amateur band ? Thanks in advance for your reply.

Jeff Corkren/W5PPB
Raymond, 
Mississippi













Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220

2005-02-18 Thread Bob Dengler

At 2/17/2005 10:01 PM, you wrote:


Needed a bandpass cavity for 220 not having one I modified one by 
shortening the inner plunger and the outer conductor. My question is do I 
need to shorten the outer cavity?

No.  I had this done to a similar 2 meter pass cavity  it worked fine, 
though it does end up being much longer physically than it needs to be.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220

2005-02-18 Thread Brent

With the answer being   NO
you dont have to shorten the outer cavity,  How does this affect the
inseration loss ?





- Original Message -
From: Bob Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220



 At 2/17/2005 10:01 PM, you wrote:

 
 Needed a bandpass cavity for 220 not having one I modified one by
 shortening the inner plunger and the outer conductor. My question is do I
 need to shorten the outer cavity?

 No.  I had this done to a similar 2 meter pass cavity  it worked fine,
 though it does end up being much longer physically than it needs to be.

 Bob NO6B







 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/2005






-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/2005

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220

2005-02-18 Thread Paul Finch

I have a question, how would the longer cavity housing affect the Q of the
cavity itself, man I miss Wacom!

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:36 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220



With the answer being   NO
you dont have to shorten the outer cavity,  How does this affect the
inseration loss ?





- Original Message -
From: Bob Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220



 At 2/17/2005 10:01 PM, you wrote:

 
 Needed a bandpass cavity for 220 not having one I modified one by
 shortening the inner plunger and the outer conductor. My question is do I
 need to shorten the outer cavity?

 No.  I had this done to a similar 2 meter pass cavity  it worked fine,
 though it does end up being much longer physically than it needs to be.

 Bob NO6B







 Yahoo! Groups Links







 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]




 --
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
 Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/2005






--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 2/14/2005

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at TNWEB LLC]






Yahoo! Groups Links














 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Standard repeater

2005-02-18 Thread wa0vus



Hi Everyone
I have a Standard RPT-10 repeater and I need a manual. I would be 
happy to pay for a copy or original if one is around.  Thanks in 
advance.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larry Kemper
Muscatine, Iowa










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: tle 1713 amp circuits wanted

2005-02-18 Thread wa0vus



--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Toby Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 IT ME AGAIN.
  LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE THE  TLE 1713 AMP  IF BAD 
 .
  TOOK IT APART AND A COUPLE OF THE  10 OHM RESISTOR IS BURN INTO
   WORK LIKE TO HAVE A PRINT OF THE CIRCUITS AND ORTHER INFO. ON IT.
  EMAIL OR A PLACE WHERE I CAN DOWNLOAD IT.
 
 N9FDF TOBY
Toby
I am sure I have the manual on this as I have 3 of them in use.  I 
will look it up scan it and let you know where it is over the week 
end.
Larry
WA0VUS










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Jeff DePolo


Valuflex is the nickname for the slightly-lower-cost line of pre-made 
Superflex jumpers from Andrew.  Valuflex jumpers use a machine-installed 
connector (most are crimped on), not the usual screw-together connectors 
that you would buy normally.  I've used them a few times, but don't 
regularly buy them.  I prefer to make my own jumpers; I've had problems with 
factory-made jumpers from both Andrew and Cablewave in the past.


  --- Jeff


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:36:01 -0600, Doug Zastrow wrote
 Hi Mike,
 
 You are right, ValueFlex is NOT in Andrew Catalog 38 nor anywhere to 
 be readily found.
 
 I was shopping the A/F CommSupply Catalog and found the ValueFlex 
 jumpers on page 53.  (Caution if downloading the catalog; it is 7 MB.)
 
 I think your advice to stick with SuperFlex is the best course to follow.
 
 Thanks...
 
 Doug
 
   - Original Message - 
   From: Mike Perryman 
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:38 AM
   Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible 
 Jumpers
 
   Doug,
 
   Youve got me stumped...  I can find no references to Valueflex 
  on the Andrew site, or in catalog 38.  I did see a reference to 
 sureflex factory made jumpers...
 
   I hate to hazard a guess...  other than to say I personally would 
 stick with the standard FSJ4-50B (also known as superflex), or LDF4-
 50A(low-loss cable).  For short jumper type runs, the standard FSJ4-
 50B cable should be more than sufficient.
 
   Sorry I can't be more helpful...
 
   mike
 -Original Message-
 From: Doug Zastrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:18 AM
 To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers
 
 Hello All,
 
 I'm selecting replacement jumpers for a two-meter repeater 
 system.  Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer antenna 
 port to antenna Heliax jumpers.
 
 Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers.  Should I 
 steer clear of the Valueflex?
 
 Thanks
 
 Doug, WB0UPJ








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: What PA temp is too much?

2005-02-18 Thread hwingate


Digikey also sells a complete line of them. Click here:
http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1132.pdf



--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Henry Radio uses 125 degree thermo-switches on their commercial
amps. If you 
 check out their web page they sell the switches for $9.50  The
switches are 
 used to activate 12-V cooling fans on their amps.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220

2005-02-18 Thread Jeff DePolo

Probably not.  You would run into problems if you were extending the center 
conductor; as you get closer and closer to the bottom of the cavity you 
get more and more capacitance off the end of the center conductor as its 
lengthened.  But obviously that's not the case here.

If you haven't modified the loops yet, you may find that you need to.  

--- Jeff



On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:01:22 -0500, Thomas Oliver wrote
 Needed a bandpass cavity for 220 not having one I modified one by 
 shortening the inner plunger and the outer conductor. My question is 
 do I need to shorten the outer cavity?  I don't think it makes any 
 difference what do ya think? I would like to know before I rivet it 
 back together.
 
 tom n8ies








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] db 4001 to 220

2005-02-18 Thread Burt Lang

As a general rule, the outer can has to be at least a can radius longer 
than the center resonator  ie a 6 in can must be at least 3 inches 
longer than the resonator.  There is no maximum length requirement on 
the outer can.

Burt  VE2BMQ

Jeff DePolo wrote:

 Probably not.  You would run into problems if you were extending the center 
 conductor; as you get closer and closer to the bottom of the cavity you 
 get more and more capacitance off the end of the center conductor as its 
 lengthened.  But obviously that's not the case here.
 
 If you haven't modified the loops yet, you may find that you need to.  
 
 --- Jeff
 
 
 
 On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:01:22 -0500, Thomas Oliver wrote
 
Needed a bandpass cavity for 220 not having one I modified one by 
shortening the inner plunger and the outer conductor. My question is 
do I need to shorten the outer cavity?  I don't think it makes any 
difference what do ya think? I would like to know before I rivet it 
back together.

tom n8ies
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] M2 Cas

2005-02-18 Thread



 To all who responded to my plea for help, THANK YOU.

 My CAS problem is resolved.  It was merely no connection to A- between drawer 
units.  I forgot about the isolated chassis and had both drawer units grounded 
to each other via the frame work.  After scratching, kicking and biting myself 
for 2-3 hrs I finally broke down and ask for help from the repeater builders 
and GE group.  As usual, you guys came through.  It was indeed a large over 
site 
and I feel extremely happy that its resolved.

   Thanks again Guys for all the help.

signed Jay  AA9YP





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Mike Perryman

Jeff,

I too, have had issues in the past with Cablewave products.  Specifiaclly
when buried, or run up a tower exposed to the elements.  I build AM
directional facilities.  No matter what lengths you go to to keep a buried
line dry (mine are usually buried in a piece of sched. 40 PVC pipe)  water
entered through the outer conductor. On a tower a rigger sometimes nicks a
jacket while working  water then gets between the jacket and outer
conductor.  With Cablewave it always caused problems.

Seems the Cablewave method of edge welding the outer conductor was never
100% water-tight.  Any nick in the outer jacket usually resulted in water
getting into the foam.  It has gotten better of the years.  But my money is
on the Andrew product, no water yet...  and I always install my own
connectors.

Also our local ham assoc. bought some pre-fabbed jumpers from a guy in PA
(to remain nameless).  He used crimped connectors.  After moving the rack
around a few times the ends loosened and caused mucho problems.  I put the
old superflex jumpers we had made back in the circuit, and the problems went
away.

An old engineer once told me if you need it done correctly the first time,
you better do it yourself.  Then you only have yourself to blame if there
are problems.

Just my 2 cents...

mike

-Original Message-
From: Jeff DePolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible
Jumpers




Valuflex is the nickname for the slightly-lower-cost line of pre-made
Superflex jumpers from Andrew.  Valuflex jumpers use a machine-installed
connector (most are crimped on), not the usual screw-together connectors
that you would buy normally.  I've used them a few times, but don't
regularly buy them.  I prefer to make my own jumpers; I've had problems with
factory-made jumpers from both Andrew and Cablewave in the past.


  --- Jeff


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:36:01 -0600, Doug Zastrow wrote
 Hi Mike,

 You are right, ValueFlex is NOT in Andrew Catalog 38 nor anywhere to
 be readily found.

 I was shopping the A/F CommSupply Catalog and found the ValueFlex
 jumpers on page 53.  (Caution if downloading the catalog; it is 7 MB.)

 I think your advice to stick with SuperFlex is the best course to follow.

 Thanks...

 Doug

   - Original Message -
   From: Mike Perryman
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:38 AM
   Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible
 Jumpers

   Doug,

   Youve got me stumped...  I can find no references to Valueflex
  on the Andrew site, or in catalog 38.  I did see a reference to
 sureflex factory made jumpers...

   I hate to hazard a guess...  other than to say I personally would
 stick with the standard FSJ4-50B (also known as superflex), or LDF4-
 50A(low-loss cable).  For short jumper type runs, the standard FSJ4-
 50B cable should be more than sufficient.

   Sorry I can't be more helpful...

   mike
 -Original Message-
 From: Doug Zastrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:18 AM
 To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

 Hello All,

 I'm selecting replacement jumpers for a two-meter repeater
 system.  Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer antenna
 port to antenna Heliax jumpers.

 Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers.  Should I
 steer clear of the Valueflex?

 Thanks

 Doug, WB0UPJ









Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Mike Perryman

Sorry about the fat-fingered spelling g!

mike

At 05:08 PM 02/18/2005 -0500, you wrote:

Jeff,

I too, have had issues in the past with Cablewave products.  Specifiaclly
when buried, or run up a tower exposed to the elements.  I build AM
directional facilities.  No matter what lengths you go to to keep a buried
line dry (mine are usually buried in a piece of sched. 40 PVC pipe)  water
entered through the outer conductor. On a tower a rigger sometimes nicks a
jacket while working  water then gets between the jacket and outer
conductor.  With Cablewave it always caused problems.

Seems the Cablewave method of edge welding the outer conductor was never
100% water-tight.  Any nick in the outer jacket usually resulted in water
getting into the foam.  It has gotten better of the years.  But my money is
on the Andrew product, no water yet...  and I always install my own
connectors.

Also our local ham assoc. bought some pre-fabbed jumpers from a guy in PA
(to remain nameless).  He used crimped connectors.  After moving the rack
around a few times the ends loosened and caused mucho problems.  I put the
old superflex jumpers we had made back in the circuit, and the problems went
away.

An old engineer once told me if you need it done correctly the first time,
you better do it yourself.  Then you only have yourself to blame if there
are problems.

Just my 2 cents...

mike

-Original Message-
From: Jeff DePolo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible
Jumpers




Valuflex is the nickname for the slightly-lower-cost line of pre-made
Superflex jumpers from Andrew.  Valuflex jumpers use a machine-installed
connector (most are crimped on), not the usual screw-together connectors
that you would buy normally.  I've used them a few times, but don't
regularly buy them.  I prefer to make my own jumpers; I've had problems with
factory-made jumpers from both Andrew and Cablewave in the past.


   --- Jeff


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:36:01 -0600, Doug Zastrow wrote
  Hi Mike,
 
  You are right, ValueFlex is NOT in Andrew Catalog 38 nor anywhere to
  be readily found.
 
  I was shopping the A/F CommSupply Catalog and found the ValueFlex
  jumpers on page 53.  (Caution if downloading the catalog; it is 7 MB.)
 
  I think your advice to stick with SuperFlex is the best course to follow.
 
  Thanks...
 
  Doug
 
- Original Message -
From: Mike Perryman
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:38 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible
  Jumpers
 
Doug,
 
Youve got me stumped...  I can find no references to Valueflex
   on the Andrew site, or in catalog 38.  I did see a reference to
  sureflex factory made jumpers...
 
I hate to hazard a guess...  other than to say I personally would
  stick with the standard FSJ4-50B (also known as superflex), or LDF4-
  50A(low-loss cable).  For short jumper type runs, the standard FSJ4-
  50B cable should be more than sufficient.
 
Sorry I can't be more helpful...
 
mike
  -Original Message-
  From: Doug Zastrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:18 AM
  To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers
 
  Hello All,
 
  I'm selecting replacement jumpers for a two-meter repeater
  system.  Specifically the repeater to duplexer and duplexer antenna
  port to antenna Heliax jumpers.
 
  Andrew offers Valueflex and Superflexible jumpers.  Should I
  steer clear of the Valueflex?
 
  Thanks
 
  Doug, WB0UPJ









Yahoo! Groups Links












Yahoo! Groups Links





-
   Mike PerrymanCavell, Mertz  Davis, Inc.
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Consulting Engineers
   http://www.cmdconsulting.com 7839 Ashton Avenue
   K5JMPManassas, VA 20109   USA
   (703) 392-9090; (703) 392-9559 fax;  DC Line (202) 332-0110
- 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread Jeff DePolo

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:08:59 -0500, Mike Perryman wrote
 Jeff,
 
 I too, have had issues in the past with Cablewave products.  Specifiaclly
 when buried, or run up a tower exposed to the elements.  I build AM
 directional facilities.  No matter what lengths you go to to keep a buried
 line dry (mine are usually buried in a piece of sched. 40 PVC pipe)
   water entered through the outer conductor. On a tower a rigger 
 sometimes nicks a jacket while working  water then gets between 
 the jacket and outer conductor.  With Cablewave it always caused problems.

I can't say I've had many problems with Cablewave foam-dielectric cables in 
the situations you describe (either on a tower or buried).  I've had 
problems with factory-made jumpers, and in all cases, the problem turned out 
to be that there was a cold solder joint on the center pin or, in the case 
of the solder-less types, that the residual adhesive/film on the center 
conductor was not adequately removed (i.e. poor contact).

I have first-hand experience with failure of Cablewave air-dielectric 
cables.  The most recent was a run of 3 1/8.  The internal spacers 
collapsed along a segment of cable where it made a gentle bend (several 
times greater than Cablewave's minimum bend radius), resulting in the center 
conductor migrating toward the shield and arcing over at 29 kW TPO.

If it's my money, I always buy Andrew.

 Seems the Cablewave method of edge welding the outer conductor was never
 100% water-tight.  Any nick in the outer jacket usually resulted in water
 getting into the foam.  It has gotten better of the years.  But my 
 money is on the Andrew product, no water yet...  and I always 
 install my own connectors.

Eventually it seems water always finds some way of getting into the jacket 
of Heliax.  The real issue is where the water goes after that.  Water 
trapped between the jacket and outer conductor is harmless.  Water that is 
trapped between the jacket and outer conductor that has gravity forcing it 
into the connector at the bottom end is another story.
 
 An old engineer once told me if you need it done correctly the first 
 time, you better do it yourself.  Then you only have yourself to 
 blame if there are problems.

If you're the engineer and it fails, somehow it ends up being your fault 
whether it's your mistake or the factory's...


  --- Jeff






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Andrew Valueflex vs. Superflexible Jumpers

2005-02-18 Thread CookTowersInc






Hey Mike and the group,
If water is the problem
look into Com scope you
will never get water in.
I was at a Comm scope
class one time and at the
be gaining of the class they
put a 1' peace of Andrews
7/8's and the same of Com scope
in a five gallon buck. They had
the class about 90 minutes or
so. After the break they slit
both hard-line (type coax) and
water poured out of the Andrews
not one drop out of the Comm Scope.
Real neat! The down fall is that Comm
Scope is very hard to work with.
If it is cold it comes off the real
and stays that way. Any one who has
worked with it can say it will not
lay flat. But water will not get into
it. Com Scope claims it is there tight
foam that they use.
Dean Westbrook, EE, PE.















Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.










Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS

2005-02-18 Thread Henry Clark, KC4KZT









Add me to the list who couldnot get a 443/448 pair to duplex in the same chassis.

Nothing I tried would ever work. Way too much desense. That wasabout 5 years
ago, and I remember someone saying then that 443/448 was a mission, and for some
unknown reason would not duplex efficiently in the Mastr II chassis.

I went the route of 2separate chassis. Works FB now...

But...I see the posters dilemna...If one has to use a separate for the RX and TX,
sort of makes the NHRC-4/M2's custom and easy application a moot point.

Maybe something you want to look at, Jeff. If I recall correctly, there are SEVERAL
that could not duplex a 443/448 pair in the same chassis without VERY noticeable
desense. Regardless of brand of controller.

Henry, KC4KZT


---Original Message---


From: Jeff Otterson
Date: 02/18/05 06:34:57
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS

Hello Jay,

 The NHRC-4/M2 should work fine in your radio, as long as the proper
modifications are made to the systems board.The CAS line is buffered with
a transistor in the controller already.

 You might want to check that there are no other jumpers or modifications
made to the systems board on the radio that could be causing you this grief.

 We have sold hundreds of those controllers; the problem you are
experiencing is not typical.Something else is wrong.

 Regards,

 Jeff Otterson, N1KDO
 NHRC LLC
























Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.









[Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer

2005-02-18 Thread Reuben Meeks


Hello Jim,
Yes, I stand corrected. It is tuned from the factory for 
147.990/147.390 mhz.
73's,
Reuben Meeks, W8GUC

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Reuben Meeks wrote:
 
  
  
  Hello Eric, It is presently tuned to 147.590/147.390 Mhz. With 
all 
  the matched cables. Tuned by the DB Factory people.
  73's, Reuben Meeks, W8GUC.
 
 You mean 147.99/147.39.
 -- 
 Jim Barbour
 WD8CHL







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] FS: CAT RLS-1000 RB switch

2005-02-18 Thread Pete D

Our club has a New and never used CAT RLS-1000 Remote base port
switch for sale.. Our linking plans changed and this is surplus to us now..
$100 shipped or Best offer..  Please contact me direct..

-73, Pete N2MCI (n2mci (at) arrl net)
 






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS

2005-02-18 Thread Coy Hilton


Okay Jay, try the circuit that I emailed you and let me know. The 
transistor is a 2N NPN. These things can be had at radio shack 
cheep. or try robbing a NPN from a junk board, most any NPN will 
work.
73 and good luck
AC0Y

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Coy,
I have a lot of different info now on trying to get a cos 
signal to
 my nhrc4/m2 controller.  Can you give me the schematic for using 
the 2n
 transistor to buffer the cas line.  Any and all suggestions will 
be used.
 Incidentally, the A- lines were not tied together, I had the TX on 
a 20amp
 power supply and the receiver on a deep cycle battery .so no A-
 were
 tied together.
 
I will try all ideas and want to thank everyone on this 
list for
 their suggestions.  I will report back on what works for me.  
Thanks again.
 Jay
 - Original Message -
 From: Coy Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:04 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: M2 CAS
 
 
 
 
  If the A- are tied togeather then that's not the problem. I use 
the
  NHRC2 controller. The CAS doesn't like to source current. I 
always
  use a 2N or a NPN transistor and a 10k resistor connected to 
the
  CAS line to buffer it and it doesn't load down the CAS line.
  I hope this helps.
  AC0Y
 
  --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   Why didnt I think of thatknowing the ground is isolated...I
  have been
   tying the chassis together instead of the A-..  what was I
  thinking..Hmmm !
   I will give it a try Bob... I am @ work @ firehouse right now 
but
  am anxious
   to get home and check that out.  Even if that doesnt cure the
  problem , it
   makes things the way they should be, ground wise that is. Tnx
  againJay
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Bob Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:00 PM
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] M2 CAS
  
  
   
At 2/17/2005 11:55 AM, you wrote:
   
Thanks for the info Bob,

  I may try the high side inject...sure 
couldnt
  hurt, it
would be much nicer to have one compact package than 2... as
  far as using
the RUS... that didnt work either... not even enough 
voltage to
  fire up
   the
controller... I may well have a controller problem with the
  NHRC /M2.
   
Seems like the ground between the external Mastr II  NHRC
  controller
   isn't
good.  Make sure the A- lines of both Mastr IIs are tied
  together (not
   just
the chassis, which is DC isolated) before giving up on the
  separate Mastr
II RX.
   
Bob NO6B
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater

2005-02-18 Thread jhoonbee


Hello all,
 I am looking for a complete ready to use repeater for 220Mhz.
Anyone have one for sale?

Danny







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] Help ID a Celwave item?

2005-02-18 Thread Eric Lemmon

Kevin,

The Motorola HFD8461A Preselector is identical to the RFS/Celwave
PD911-PB4-1-2 except for the N connectors.  This is an optional
accessory for the GR1225, RKR1225, and similar low-tier packaged
repeaters.  It is specified for a 2 MHz bandwidth and 2.25 dB insertion
loss.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 Kevin Bednar wrote:
 
Can anyone ID a Celwave HFD8461A? It looks like some type of notch
filter. Has 2 female N connectors, 4 cavity, and says 144-160 MHz on it.
I can't find any reference to it on the web. TIA to all.





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [Repeater-Builder] Source for Moto T1504 duplexer locking nuts?

2005-02-18 Thread Kenneth Cook

3/8 in. It is too far to the site for me to check the TPI. Wonder if they
are 24 TPI?

Kenneth P. Cook Jr., W8DZN
President, Bucyrus Amateur Radio Club
Assistant Emergency Coordinator for Crawford  Marion Co., Ohio
Winlink 2000 Representative for District 6
ARRL VE, ARRL Registered, Certified Instructor/Examiner
for ECOMM Levels I, II and III.

-Original Message-
From: Steve Rodgers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:22 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Source for Moto T1504 duplexer locking nuts?


Hi,

I received these today, and they are way too big! They just slide right over

the threads. The diameter of the threaded rod is smaller than 1/2. I 
measured with my dial calipers and the diameter is more like 0.370.


Steve 
WA6ZFT



On Wednesday 16 February 2005 07:50, Jack Davis wrote:
 94830A550
   Cadmium-Plated Stl Hex Thin Flex-Top Locknut 1/2-20
 Screw Size, 3/4 Width, 21/64 Height
   In stock at $10.91 per Pack
   This item is only sold in Packs of 10

Packs of 10



   http://www.mcmaster.com/


   Here you go!

   Jack
   K6YC

 - Original Message -
 From: mch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:17 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Source for Moto T1504 duplexer locking
 nuts?

  Well, this will give you the specs on it. It subs to another number, and
  that other part is NLA, but the description is still there.
  ___
  Item number. 0210397A06* The item 0210397A06 has been replaced
  with 0210348A05. Selecting this
  item will add 0210348A05 to your cart.
  0210348A05: Item has been cancelled
 
  NUTLCK 1/2-20X5/16 HEX STL CAD
  Unit of Measure: 3  PK
  ___
 
  Joe M.
 
  Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
  At 12:59 PM 2/15/05, you wrote:
  I have a Motorola T1504 duplexer in need of 4 locking nuts. The
locking
  nut part number is 2-10397A06, but a call to Motorola parts indicates
  the
  part number isn't on file. Does anyone have any recommendations for a
  substitute part, and do they know what the nut size and thread pitch
   are for the locking nut?
  
  Steve
  WA6ZFT
 
  As I understand from a friend they've been NLA for a few years.
 
  I need 6 or so and am almost ready to call in a
  favor and have a friend make some on a lathe,
  starting with hex stock.
 
  Mike
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
 
  Yahoo! Groups Links

 Yahoo! Groups Links







 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater

2005-02-18 Thread Ed Folta

  Danny
  Contact me during the week 800-298-2850
  re 220 FM Repeater

  Ed Folta
  Com/Rad Inc

  - Original Message - 
  From: jhoonbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:57 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater


  
  
   Hello all,
   I am looking for a complete ready to use repeater for 220Mhz.
   Anyone have one for sale?
  
   Danny
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  










 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/